Corporate Governance in Indian Banking Sector: An Analysis: February 2020
Corporate Governance in Indian Banking Sector: An Analysis: February 2020
Corporate Governance in Indian Banking Sector: An Analysis: February 2020
net/publication/339199874
CITATIONS READS
0 433
2 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Rohit Bansal on 15 March 2020.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
"Governance implies the procedure of basic leadership and execution, including
numerous exercises. Great administration is constantly capable and responsible,
impartial, successful and productive, straightforward; participatory that adheres to the
standard of law". According to our sentiment, administration is synonymous to teach
just as key in each circle of life so we as a whole required great administration in our
home, office, business and so forth. On the off chance that we look the general public
we live in, we would see that if there would be no standards and guidelines than the
conduct of society, giving the rights and confinements then society may separate and
it might move towards rebellion if there would be no principles and guidelines for
joining the general public. Because of these reasons, there is a requirement for
administration in the public arena everywhere which is done generally by the
legislature. So as to Governance of enterprises is known as corporate administration
that is a generally late idea (Cadbury 1992; OECD 1999, 2004). Over the previous
decade, the idea has developed to address the ascent of corporate social
responsibilities and the more dynamic interest of the two investors and partners in
corporate basic leadership. In India, the idea of “CSR is represented by statement 135
of the Companies Act, 2013 urges organizations to spend at any rate 2 percent of their
normal net benefit of three earlier years on CSR”. There are two classes of corporate
administration, first spotlights on personal conduct standards the real conduct of
enterprises, as estimated by execution, productivity, development, money related
structure, and treatment of investors and partners. The second worries about the
regularizing structure, the guidelines under which firms work, with the principles of
the administration framework, money related markets, and work markets. The
development of corporate administration can be related with the rise of the primary
universal organizations in the sixteenth and seventeenth century, for example, the East
India Company, the Levant Company or Hudson's Bay Company.
The East India Company was the primary organization set apart by the division
among possession and administration. The term 'executive' was commonly utilized
just because toward the finish of the seventeenth century in the Bank of England and
the Bank of Scotland. From the recorded point of view, the use of corporate
administration in its underlying phases of improvement is basically connected to
significant organizations, however in current business; it fundamentally alludes to all
types of business association. In any case, the investigation of verifiable improvement
rehearses, however it might be a long procedure and may need to set up crucial social
and institutional changes whenever required (Iskander et al., 1999; and Olayiwola,
2010).
I. World Scenario of Corporate Governance: The seeds of present day corporate
administration were most likely appeared by the Watergate embarrassment in the
USA during 1972 to 1974 after that examined by US administrative and enactment
mirrored the control disappointments that had enabled a few significant
partnerships to make illicit political commitments and pay off government
authorities. “While these improvements in the US invigorated discussion in the
UK, a progression of outrages and crumples in that nation in the late 1980s and mid
1990s drove investors” and banks to stress over their ventures such a large number
of organizations in the UK which saw unstable development in profit during the
1980s finished the decade in an importantly terrible way. The London Stock
Exchange has settled up an advisory group under the chairmanship of Sir Arian
Cadbury in the year 1991, to help increase the expectations of corporate
administration and the degree of trust in money related detailing and examining by
setting up a council that explored the responsibility of the governing body to
investors and to the general public. This panel had presented its report and the
"code of best practices" in the long stretch of December year 1992 this report
comprise the techniques for administration to keep up a legitimate harmony
between the forces of the top managerial staff and their responsibility.
Contemporary corporate administration had begun in the year 1992 with the
“Cadbury report in the UK”.
II. Indian Scenario of Corporate Governance: The corporate administration started
by the Confederation of Indian Industry. Toward the year's end 1995, CII set up a
team to plan an intentional code of corporate administration and last draft of this
code was broadly coursed in the year 1997 and one year from now April 1998, the
code was discharged as "Attractive Corporate Governance: A Code". Following the
CII's drive, the “Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)” set up a council
under KM Birla to structure a compulsory cum-recommendatory code for recorded
organizations. “KM Birla Committee presented its report in February 2000 and it
was affirmed by SEBI toward the year's end 2000”. Following the CII, SEBI and
the “Department of Company Affairs (DCA)” adjusted organizations through the
posting understanding and executed by the Companies Act 1956, to fuse explicit
c. Prompt Corrective Action: RBI has set trigger focuses based on "Capital to
Risk Asset Ratio", "Non Performing Assets" and "Return on Assets (ROA)".
Based on these trigger focuses; the banks need to pursue called 'Required
Action Plan'. Next to Mandatory Action Plan, RBI has optional activity
designs as well, a portion of the activities are fundamental to reestablish the
budgetary soundness of banks must be obligatorily taken by the bank while
different moves will be made at the prudence of RBI, relies upon the profile of
the bank.
V. Public Sector Banks & Corporate Governance: A significant part of Indian
Banking area is under the influence of open division banks in spite of the
Globalization, Liberalization and Privatization and passageway of private and
outside banks in the field. The current structure of open division banks isn't lined
up with standards of good corporate administration on the grounds that the
bureaucratic problems, red tapes and demotivated work culture add further fuel to
the fire. So far banks have been troubled with "Social Responsibility" and
constrained to tow the line of speculation directed by the ideological group in
control, the restraining infrastructure of PSB had shielded them from the
challenge. The Corporate Governance in PSBs is significant, not just in light of
the fact that PSBs happen to command the financial business, yet in addition they
are probably not going to exit from banking business however they may get
changed. To the degree there is open proprietorship in PSBs, the different
destinations of the Government as proprietor and the perplexing head specialist
connections can't be wished away so the PSBs can't be required to aimlessly as
private corporate banks in administration however broad standards are similarly
legitimate. To some things up, the issue of corporate administration in PSBs is
significant and furthermore complex in the financial business viewpoint; the
characteristics of corporate administration give rules to the chiefs and the top
administration for overseeing the matter of banks. Every one of the rules are
identified with the foundation of banks, corporate points and do their exercises
and minding the enthusiasm of partners and guarantee that the corporate exercises
are meeting with the open desires that banks will work in a moral and lawful way
subsequently securing the enthusiasm of its contributors. All these wide issues
identifying with administration apply to different organizations likewise; however
they expect more importance for banks since they manage open stores
straightforwardly.
VI. Private Sector Banks & Corporate Governance: On July 2nd, 2004, RBI gave
draft rules on possession and administration in private part banks in India, these
rules acquired the open space for more extensive discussion and criticism. The
RBI gave last strategy rules on February 28th, 2005 subsequent to taking thought
the open input. It has been viewed as important to set out a complete structure of
approach in a straightforward way identified with corporate administration for
Indian private area banks as under:
a. The extreme possession and control of private part banks are all around
expanded to limit the hazard and abuse of utilized assets.
b. The chiefs and CEO of the banks must be 'Fit and Proper' according to
roundabout June 25th, 2004 for watching sound corporate administration
standards.
c. Private Banks have ideal total assets for activity and precise security.
d. Every approach and process must be straightforward and reasonable.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Firoz M. (2010) has deduced in his investigation that the associations are constantly
expected to improve the extent of monetary revealing from the present detailing
framework as acknowledgment and estimation of natural budgetary advantages, costs,
resources and liabilities. Alao O. and Raimi, L. (2011) recognized in their
examination that the job of corporate administration practice in case of worldwide
monetary downturn that compelling corporate administration practice had the option
to guarantee the investors that in such downturn have a wave impact on economies,
the enthusiasm of investors would be secured in a successful way. Millon, David
(2011) has clarified in his examination that since a long time ago run thriving of
company relies upon the prosperity of its different partners and investors and
maintainability is likewise needful for current accessibility of common assets in
which the organization can endure and prosper. Gupta, P. (2012) has examined that
the better corporate administration prompts better execution of the organizations. He
additionally found in his examination that corporate administration soundly affects the
offer's costs and money related execution of the organizations. Marshall, D.W. (2014)
dissected a revelation score, measure the straightforwardness level and corporate
administration exposures made in yearly report of recorded open restricted
Selected Banks
Public Sector Banks Private Sector Banks
State Bank of India (SBI) HDFC Bank
Bank of Baroda (BOB) ICICI Bank
Punjab National Bank (PNB) Kotak Mahindra Bank
Central Bank (CB) AXIS Bank
a. Hypothesis: Following hypotheses have been formulated and described:
H01: Selected Public Sector Banks show compliance with Corporate
Governance Standard & Disclosure practices as Clause 49 of Listing
Agreement.
H02: Selected Private Sector Banks show compliance with Corporate
Governance Standard & Disclosure practices as Clause 49 of Listing
Agreement
b. Significance of the Study: The Corporate Governance assumes an essential job
in Banking Sector of the nation so uncommon spotlight on the Corporate
Governance in this area becomes vital on the grounds that banks are assuming a
significant job in the budgetary arrangement of the nation. As we probably am
aware, lessening the conceivable monetary weight of recapitalizing the PSBs,
consideration towards Corporate Governance in the financial area is required and
the strength of open proprietorship in the financial part so corporate practices
would likewise set the principles for Corporate Governance in the financial
segment.
c. Parameters of the Study: This study is based on seven parameters as per SEBI
Clause & RBI guidelines for corporate governance; each of them is analyzing the
status of Corporate Governance disclosures. These are the following:
1. Board Structure Strength & Size
2. Director’s Attendance in Board Meetings
3. Audit Committee
4. Grievances of Shareholders &Investors
5. Remuneration Committee
6. Mandatory Statutory Disclosures
7. Non-Mandatory Statutory Disclosures
DISCUSSIONS
1. Board Structure Strength & Size: As per the report of KM Birla Committee, the
leading group of the organization must have a reasonable and ideal blend of official
and non-official chiefs which would not be under 50 percent of the board involving
“non-official directors”. The quantity of free chiefs would rely upon the idea of the
board's Chairman. On the off chance that an organization has a non - official
Chairman, at any rate 33 percent of board ought to be contained “autonomous
chiefs” and if an organization has an “Executive Chairman”, in any event half of
the board ought to be free.
Table - 1: Board Structure Strength& Size of Public & Private Sector Banks
Annual Report 2018-19
Public Sector Banks Private Sector Banks
Category KOTAK
SBI BOB PNB CB HDFC ICICI AXIS
MAHINDRA
Total
I 12 9 11 12 11 12 11 13
Directors
Executive
4 3 4 3 3 5 4 2
A Directors
Promoters - - - - - - - -
Others - - - - - - - -
Non-Exect.
B 8 6 7 9 8 7 7 11
Directors
Promoters - - - - - - - -
Independent 3 3 3 2 5 6 5 8
Nominee 4 2 4 2 - 1 - 3
Others 1 1 - 5 3 - 2 -
II Directors (in Percentage)
Executive
33.33 33.33 36.36 25.00 27.27 41.67 36.36 15.38
Directors
Non-Exect.
66.67 66.67 63.64 75.00 72.73 58.33 63.64 84.62
Directors
Independent
25.00 33.33 27.27 16.67 45.45 50.00 45.45 61.54
Directors
Source: Data compiled from annual reports of Banks
It's investigated in above table that both chose banks have kept up “an ideal mix of
official and non-official chiefs with at the very least 50 percent” of the board
involving the non-official executives just as the state of free chiefs is additionally met
in both open and private segment chosen banks thus, the two speculations, H01 and
H02 have been demonstrated.
2. Executive's Attendance in Board Meetings: According to Birla Committee that
load up meeting ought to be held in any event multiple times in a year, a hole in
gatherings must not be over four months between any two gatherings and most
unveiled to the investors. (Wafa et al. 2001) reflected in their investigation that its
normal positive advantages and commitments to the organizations from a critical
review panel.
4. Complaints of Shareholders and Investors: This is prescribed according to
condition 49 that a board council under the “chairmanship of a Non-Executive
Director” must be framed for taking a gander at the objections of investors and
speculators and reviewing them. This advisory group will concentrate of investor's
complaints and sharpen the administration to change these protests.
Based on above table we can see that both chose banks have not gone into any really
huge related gathering exchange that may have potential clash with the enthusiasm of
the bank. Rebelliousness with respect to capital market issues during the last three
money related years. There was no punishment forced in open segment banks with the
exception of if there should be an occurrence of Central Bank. Investors data on the
arrangement of new executives, resigning chiefs, reappointment, quarterly outcome
and introduction, share move, chiefs duty proclamation every one of the issues have
been unveiled in the Annual report of banks.
7. Non-Mandatory Statutory Disclosures: As per clause 49 there are various
statutory disclosures which are Non-Mandatory.
REFERENCES
[1] Alao, O. & Raimi, L. (2011). Global economic meltdown and the role of financial institutions:
lessons from South Africa for Policymakers in Nigeria. Humanomics. Vol. 27 (3), pg. 201-211.
Retrieved from https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/
[2] Bhasin, M.L. (2010). Corporate Governance Disclosure Practices: The Portrait of a Developing
Country. International Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 5 (4) pg. 150-167. Retrieved
from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view
[3] Chilumuri, S. R. (2013). Corporate governance in Banking Sector: A Case Study of State Bank of
India. IOSR Journal of Business and Management. vol. 8 (1), pg. 15 – 10. Retrieved from
http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol8-issue1/C0811520.pdf
[4] Collier P.A. (1993). Audit Committee in Major UK Companies. Managerial Auditing Journal.
Vol. 8 (03), pg. 25-30.
[5] Corsetti G., Pesenti P. & Roubini N. (1998). What Caused the Asian Currency and Financial
Crisis? Unpublished Working Paper, New York University, New York.
[6] Firoz, M. (2010). Environmental Accounting and International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS). Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1715436
[7] Gayathri, S. (2015). A comparative study of the corporate governance practices of selected public
and private sector commercial banks in India. International Journal of Business and
Administration Research Review, Vol. 01(12), pg. 114-119.
[8] Gupta, P. (2012). A study of impact of corporate governance practices on firm Performance in
India, Japanese and South Korean companies. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract-2219848/
[9] Iskander M., Meyerman G., Gray D.F. & Hagan H. (1999). Corporate Restructuring & Governance
in East Asia. Finance & Development. Vol. 36 (04), pg. 42.
[10] Kaur, D. and Kaur, T. (2015).Corporate Governance Disclosure Practices of Public and Private
Sector Banks: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Business Management. Vol. 2 (1).
Retrieved from http://www.ijbm.co.in/downloads/vol2-issue1/60.pdf
[11] Kumar, R. (2016). Corporate Governance Practices in Public and Private Sector Banks.
International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field. Vol. 2 (11), pg. 338-
342.
[12] Kumar, S. S., & Kannappan, M. (2018). A Comparative Study on Corporate Governance in Public
Sector and Private Sector. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 119 (17)
pg. 933-943. Retrieved from http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/
[13] Maheshwari, M. & Meena, S. (2014). Corporate Governance Standards and Practices in State
Bank of India: An Empirical Study. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research.
Vol. 3 (11), pg. 21 – 26.
[14] Marshall, D.W. (2014). Corporate Governance disclosure practices: evidence from Barbados.
Social and economic studies. Vol. 3 (04), pg. 307-341.
[15] McCarthy D.J. & Puffer S.M. (2002). Corporate Governance in Russia: Towards a European, US
or Russian Model. European Management Journal. Vol. 20 (06), pg. 630-640.
[16] Millon, David (2011). Two Models of Corporate Social Responsibility. Wake Forest Law Review.
Vol. 46, pg. 523-35. Retrieved from https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlufac/137/
[17] Mitton T. (2002). A Cross-Firm Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Governance on the East
Asian Financial Crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 64 (02), pg. 215-241.
[18] Olayiwola W.K. (2010). Practice and Standard of Corporate Governance in the Nigerian Banking
Industry. International Journal of Economics and Finance. Vol. 2 (04), pg. 178-189.
[19] Razman R. & Iskandar M.T. (2002). The Effectiveness of Audit Committee in Monitoring the
Quality of Corporate Reporting. International Conference on Corporate Governance.
[20] Sanan N. & Yadav S. (2011). Corporate Governance Reforms and Financial Disclosure: A Case of
Indian Companies. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, Vol. 10 (02), pg. 62-81.
[21] Som L. (2016). Corporate Governance of Public Sector Banks in India. ICRA Bulletin: Money &
Finance. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313105401
[22] Wafa S.A., Aik O. F., Ahmad Z.K. & Mohidin R. (2001). Corporate Governance of Malaysian
Public Listed Companies. The 6th International Conference on Global Business and Economic
Development, Bratislava, Slovakia.