V Risk 10 English PDF

At admission ⁭
Violence risk screening -10 (V-RISK-10) At discharge ⁭

In policlinic ⁭
Patient’s name: Date of birth:
Female ⁭ Male ⁭ Patient number:
Date of admittance: Date of discharge: Registration number:
Signed in by: Date:
Scoring instruction:
The rater collects information about each of the ten risk factors on the V-RISK-10 checklist. Some
examples of important scoring information are described under each item. Put a check in the box to
indicate the degree of likelihood that the risk factor applies to the patient in question:
No: Does not apply to this patient
Maybe/moderate: Maybe applies/present to a moderately severe degree
Yes: Definitely applies to a severe degree
Do not know: Too little information to answer
1. Previous and/or current violence No Maybe/ Yes Do not

moderate know
Severe violence refers to physical attack (including with various
weapons) towards another individual with intent to inflict severe
physical harm. Yes: The individual in question must have committed
at least 3 moderately violent aggressive acts or 1 severe violent act.
Moderate or less severe aggressive acts such as kicks, blows and
shoving that does not cause severe harm to the victim is rated
Maybe/moderate.
2. Previous and /or current threats (verbal/physical) No Maybe/ Yes Do not

moderate know
Verbal: Statements, yelling and the like, that involve threat of
inflicting other individuals physical harm.
Physical: Movements and gestures that warn physical attack.
3. Previous and/or current substance abuse No Maybe/ Yes Do not

moderate know
The patient has a history of abusing alcohol, medication and/or other
substances (e.g. amphetamine, heroin, cannabis). Abuse of solvents
or glue should be included. To rate Yes, the patient must have and/or
have had extensive abuse/dependence, with reduced occupational or
educational functioning, reduced health and/or reduced participation
in leisure activities.
4. Previous and/or current major mental illness No Maybe/ Yes Do not

moderate know
NB: Whether the patient has or has had a psychotic disorder (e.g.
schizophrenia, delusional disorder, psychotic affective disorder).
See item 5 to rate personality disorders.
© Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo, Norway

2007 Hartvig, Østberg, Alfarnes, Moger, Skjønberg & Bjørkly Page 1 of 2
5. Personality disorder No Maybe/ Yes Do not
moderate know
Of interest here are eccentric (schizoid, paranoid) and impulsive,
uninhibited (emotionally unstable, antisocial) types.
6. Shows lack of insight into illness and/or behaviour No Maybe/ Yes Do not
moderate know
This refers to the degree to which the patient lacks insight in his/her
mental illness, with regard to for instance need of medication, social
consequences or behaviour related to illness or personality disorder.
7. Expresses suspicion No Maybe/ Yes Do not

moderate know
The patient expresses suspicion towards other individuals either
verbally or nonverbally. The person in question appears to be
“on guard” towards the environment.
8. Shows lack of empathy No Maybe/ Yes Do not

moderate know
The patient appears emotionally cold and without sensitivity towards
others’ thoughts or emotional situation.
9. Unrealistic planning No Maybe/ Yes Do not

moderate know
This assesses to which degree the patient him/herself has unrealistic
plans for the future (inside or outside the inpatient unit). Is for
instance the patient him/herself realistic with regard to what he/she
can expect of support from family and of professional and social
network? It is important to assess whether the patient is cooperative
and motivated with regard to following plans.
10. Future stress-situations No Maybe/ Yes Do not

moderate know
This evaluates the possibility that the patient may be exposed to stress
and stressful situations in the future and his/her ability to cope with
stress. For example (in and outside inpatient unit): reduced ability to
tolerate boundaries, physical proximity to possible victims of
violence, substance use, homelessness, spending time in violent
environment/association with violent environment, easy access to
weapons etc.
Overall clinical evaluation
· Based on clinical judgement, other available information and the checklist:
· How great do you think the violence risk is for this patient? (Put a check in one of the boxes)
LOW MODERATE HIGH
· Suggestion following overall clinical evaluation: (Put a check in one of the boxes)
NO MORE DETAILED VIOLENCE MORE DETAILED VIOLENCE RISK
RISK ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
IMPLEMENTATION OF PREVENTIVE MEASURES
Justifications/reasons/arguments should be detailed in patient record and/or discharge summary
© Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo, Norway

2007 Hartvig, Østberg, Alfarnes, Moger, Skjønberg & Bjørkly Page 2 of 2

V Risk 10 English PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

V Risk 10 English PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

V Risk 10 English PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

At admission ⁭

Violence risk screening -10 (V-RISK-10) At discharge ⁭

Patient’s name: Date of birth:

Female ⁭ Male ⁭ Patient number:

Date of admittance: Date of discharge: Registration number:

Signed in by: Date:

1. Previous and/or current violence No Maybe/ Yes Do not

2. Previous and /or current threats (verbal/physical) No Maybe/ Yes Do not

3. Previous and/or current substance abuse No Maybe/ Yes Do not

4. Previous and/or current major mental illness No Maybe/ Yes Do not

© Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo, Norway

7. Expresses suspicion No Maybe/ Yes Do not

8. Shows lack of empathy No Maybe/ Yes Do not

9. Unrealistic planning No Maybe/ Yes Do not

10. Future stress-situations No Maybe/ Yes Do not

IMPLEMENTATION OF PREVENTIVE MEASURES

Justifications/reasons/arguments should be detailed in patient record and/or discharge summary

© Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo, Norway

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.