Remotely Piloted Aviation Systems (RPAS) - Frequently Asked Questions
Remotely Piloted Aviation Systems (RPAS) - Frequently Asked Questions
Remotely Piloted Aviation Systems (RPAS) - Frequently Asked Questions
MEMO
MEMO/14/259
What is the size of the drones market, who are the major players?
The technology for drones is maturing and the market for civil drones is evolving fast. On
some estimates in the next 10 years civil drones could be worth 10% of the aviation
market. That's 15 billion euro per year.
There are already more than 1,700 different types of drones produced by official
manufacturers, with about one third in Europe.
Drones manufacturing may create up to 150,000 European jobs by 2050, following some
industry estimates.
Currently, the US and Israel dominate the global RPAS manufacturing sector, particularly
in the field of military RPAS. Other non-European Union countries, such as Brazil, China,
India and Russia, also show potential to become strong competitors.
Europe is also very active. Some 500 manufacturers are producing drones worldwide, of
which about a third are in Europe. More than 1,000 operators have been granted an
operating licence in Europe. In France for example, the number of approved operators
increased from 86 in December 2012 to 431 in February 2014. Sweden and the UK also
issued more than 200 operators' licences each in recent years.
What are the current rules covering the use of civil drones?
The rules covering drones are currently set at UN level, by the International Civil Aviation
Organisation (ICAO), the UN body dealing with civil aviation. ICAO allows drones
operations (RPAS) provided a national authority gives a specific authorization, i.e.
authorising the use of drones in a non-segregated airspace (this means in the same
airspace also used by 'manned' air traffic). Such authorisations are typically restricted to
specific operations under specific conditions in order to avoid safety hazards.
Some EU member states, such as Sweden, France, Denmark, Italy, Germany, Czech
Republic, Lithuania and the UK have adopted legislation for simple operations by light
RPAS, to avoid this case-by-case authorization process. However, national authorizations
do not benefit from mutual recognition and do not allow for European wide activities,
either to produce or to operate drones. The authorisation procedures also do not provide a
coherent framework, with the necessary legal safeguards in relation to concerns about
safety, security, privacy, liability to be built in.
2
For all these reasons the European Council, in December 2013, asked the Commission to
develop a framework for the safe integration of RPAS into civil airspace as from 2016.
3
The identified security requirements will then need to be translated into legal obligations
for all relevant players, like the air navigation service provider, RPAS operator or telecom
service provider, under the oversight of the competent authorities at the national or
European levels.
IP/14/384
STATEMENT/14/110