Improving Safety at Sea Through The Compliance With The International Maritime Safety Codes

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Jelena Nikcevic Grdinic, Ph.

D
E-mail: jelenag@ac.me
University of Montenegro
Maritime Faculty Kotor
Dobrota 36, 85330 Kotor, Montenegro

Improving Safety at Sea Through the Compliance with the International


Maritime Safety Codes

Abstract: There is a number of international instruments that contribute to the improvement and
advancement of safety at sea. All international instruments have primarily the task to make sea
navigation less dangerous and to reduce, as much as possible, the risks in relation to maritime
navigation, and hence the occurrence of maritime accidents and pollution of the sea. In addition to
international conventions which are the basic international instruments, the codes adopted by
various international organizations are of particular importance in improving the safety of
navigation. Certainly in that area, a special place is occupied by IMO as the basic organization
which is responsible for improving the maritime safety. Since its inception, the IMO has convened
many international conferences and developed many regulations, recommendations and codes of
practice concerning the carriage of dangerous cargoes by sea. Thirty conventions and protocols and
numerous codes and recommendations concerning maritime safety, the prevention of marine
pollution and other related matters have been adopted by the IMO. In this paper we have tried to
point out the most important international codes whose observance is necessary in order to improve
safety at sea. A special emphasis is given to the role of a number of international organizations in
the safety of navigation with a special emphasis on the IMO.

Key words: safety of navigation, safety, international instruments, codes.

1. The Necessity of Acceptance of International Instruments on Maritime Safety


The entire maritime law is more or less codified by a number of international conventions, which
the states must accept and incorporate them in their national legal systems. Pursuant to Article 26
("Pacta sunt servanda") of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties iz 1969. "… every treaty
in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith." This would
mean that the obligations of contracting States to incorporate convention provisions into their
national legal system and to ensure that standards are observed adequately and in harmony with the
actions of the other States. In fact, international conventions are integrated into domestic law or as
professor Grabovac points out "nationalization of international regulations" is carried out.1
International norms integrated in the legal systems of national states form a specific legal system of
regulations, which differs from the Continental and Anglo-Saxon legal system, one might say, is the
third legal system in the world.2 Why ther is a need for nationalization of the international
regulations in maritime law, in relation to other branches of the law? The answer to this we can find
by reference to three facts. First, it is clear that navigation takes place in almost the same way in all
countries and the existence of international regulations causes to avoid the existence of different
legal regulations, which would lead to dangerous and unsafe shipping. The, international
regulations prevent the international shipping industry to meet contradictory national safety
1
Grabovac I. (2009) International contracts as a base for harmonizing maritime law – in relation to the Law on
Amendments to the Maritime Code, 2008, Collection of Works of the Faculty of Law in Split, Vol. 46 (2), pp. 261 -
269.
2
Bolanča, D. (2002) Maritime Law In the Era of Globalisation-Universal Law or A Mixed Legal System? Zbornik
radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 67(3-4), pp. 333-338.

1
regulations for the construction and operation of vessels. And last but not least, international
conventions set up minimum standards for regulation of competition between States.
Regulations on maritime safety, by their nature, in all countries have identical way regulate the
maritime navigation. So that the whole matter is regulated by international instruments that must be
respected strictly and consistently applied by each country. There are many international
instruments issued in this sense. For example, international conventions, resolutions, codes,
guidelines, guides and regulations. In accordance with the provisions of Article 94 of the UNCLOS
Convention of 1982 which contain general obligations of the flag state3 regarding the safety of
navigation, in paragraph 3 clearly states "… every State shall take such measures for ships flying its
flag as are necessary to ensure safety at sea with regard, inter alia, to: (a) the construction,
equipment and seaworthiness of ships; (b) the manning of ships, labour conditions and the training
of crews, taking into account the applicable international instruments; (c) the use of signals, the
maintenance of communications and the prevention of collisions." Then, paragraph 4 contains that
"…such measures shall include those necessary to ensure: (a) that each ship, before registration
and thereafter at appropriate intervals, is surveyed by a qualified surveyor of ships, and has on
board such charts, nautical publications and navigational equipment and instruments as are
appropriate for the safe navigation of the ship; (b) that each ship is in the charge of a master and
officers who possess appropriate qualifications, in particular in seamanship, navigation,
communications and marine engineering, and that the crew is appropriate in qualification and
numbers for the type, size, machinery and equipment of the ship; (c) that the master, officers and, to
the extent appropriate, the crew are fully conversant with and required to observe the applicable
international regulations concerning the safety of life at sea, the prevention of collisions, the
prevention, reduction and control of marine pollution, and the maintenance of communications by
radio…" In the same Article, paragraph 5, it is pointed out that on the occasion of taking over the
stated measures "… each State is required to conform to generally accepted international
regulations, procedures and practices and to take any steps which may be necessary to secure their
observance."
It follows that no state can independently determine these issues. In fact a general rule is that
states accept international regulations in this field. However, this does not mean that the states
cannot make their national legislation that must strictly follow international regulations.4

2. The Role of International Organizations in the Safety of Navigation

There is a number of international organizations whose actions, through the preparation of


international conventions, adopt the regulations on maritime safety. But the most important of them
is IMO (International Maritime Organization). Certainly the important roles have the ILO
(International Labour Organization), UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and
Development), and of regional organizations, in particular place belongs to the EMSA (European
Maritime Safety Agency). There are other non-governmental organizations, institutions and
associations whose members perform navigational activities and various other activities that are
directly or indirectly related to maritime safety.5
3
The flag state is the state whose flag the ship is flying, or the state in whose register the ship is registered. The flag of
the vessel is the element of individualization of the vessel which indicates his nationality. Each state independently
determines the conditions that must be met in order the vessel may receive its nationality or the right that vessel flies its
flag. The prescribed conditions should identify the genuine link between ship and flag. The flag state has legislative and
executive authority over the vessel flying its flag. However, when the vessel arrives in the coastal belt, which is under
the sovereignty of another state, it comes under the jurisdiction of that coastal state.
4
Each country has its own national regulations (laws and bylaws), in the field of safety of navigation which must be
fully in line with international regulations. In Montenegro, the main legislation governing the subject matter is the Law
on Safety of Maritime Navigation of 2013 (″Official Gazette of Montenegro″, No. 62/2013).
5
These are different organizations: Ship-owners Associations – ICS (International Chamber of Shipping International
Chamber of Shipping), INTERTANKO (International Association of Independent Tanker Owners), INTERCARGO
(International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners), BIMCO (Baltic and International Maritime Council), ISMA
(International Security Management Association); Seafarers Associations – ITF (International Transport Workers'

2
ILO is a specialized agency of the UN, which was founded in 1919. In the area of the maritime
sector, it adopted a large number of conventions and recommendations, inter alia, relating to the
working and living conditions for sailors. Especially important is the Maritime Labour Convention,
MLC from 2006 laying down standards with regard to minimum requirements for work on board,
conditions of employment, wages, hours of work and rest, medical care.
UNCTAD is a permanent body of the General Assembly of the UN in the field of trade and
development. It was founded in 1964 with its headquarters in Geneva. The primary objective of
UNCTAD is to define the rules that apply to all aspects of development, including transportation.
UNCTAD Committee on Shipping, which specifically takes into account the commercial and
economic aspects of maritime affairs. The publication, entitled Review of Maritime Transport has a
major contribution to maritime safety. This magazine has been published every year from 1968.
The publication analyzes the changes that are happening in the maritime trade and port sector,
which are displayed through the appropriate statistical information.
EMSA based in Lisbon, was established in 2002, after a major maritime accident of the tanker
Erica in order to contribute to the safety of maritime navigation in the European Union, by taking a
number of measures and actions aimed at reducing the risk of maritime accidents, prevention of
pollution caused by ships, taking care of human lives at sea. EMSA has an important role in
assisting the candidate countries for EU membership (in the implementation of regulations in their
national legislation) in the field of maritime safety and preventing pollution of the sea.

2.1. IMO and Safety of Navigation

The role of IMO has been defined in the Article 2 of the Convention on the International
Maritime Organization (IMO Convention) which was adopted on 6 March 1948 in Geneva,
Switzerland, and was entered into force on 17 March 1958 6. Article 1 of the IMO Convention sets
out the purposes of the Organization, establishes the global scope of IMO’s safety and antipollution
activities. It also refers to other tasks such as the promotion of efficiency of navigation and the
availability of shipping services based upon the freedom of shipping of all flags to take part in
international trade without discrimination. Article 2 says that IMO shall: "… a) consider and make
recommendations upon matters” (within its attributions), "… b) provide for the drafting of
conventions …, and recommend these to governments…and convene such conferences as may be
necessary"…"c) provide machinery for consultation among Members and the exchange of
information among Governments…"
Almost 50 international conventions and hundreds of guidelines and codes have been adopted
under the auspices of the IMO. These instruments are constantly refined and updated, and constitute
the regulatory framework of international shipping.
The vast majority of IMO international conventions are in force, and several of them have a large,
almost universal acceptance. Additionally, they cover almost all the world fleet tonnage to which
they apply. Today it is virtually impossible for a ship to sail, unless its flag State is party to the
principal IMO conventions.

Federation), IFSMA (International Federation of Shipmasters' Associations), IMPA (International Maritime Pilots’
Association); Shippers and Cargo Owners Associations – OCIMF (Oil Companies International Marine Forum), CEFIC
(European Chemical Industry Council); Insurers Associations – IUMI (International Union of Marine Insurance), IG
P&I Clubs (International Group of P&I); Regulatory Organizations and Classification Societies – IACS (International
Association of Classification Societies), ISO (International Organization for Standardization), IEC (International
Electrotechnical Commission); Ports,Terminals and Port Services Associations - IAPH (International Association of
Ports and Harbors), SIGTTO (Society of International Gas Tanker & Terminal Operators) and Navigational Services
Associations different organizations that provide navigation services – IALA (International Association of Marine Aids
to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities).
6
Article 74 of the IMO Convention reads as follow: "... The present Convention shall enter into force on the date when
21 States, of which seven shall each have total tonnage of not less than 1,000,000 gross tons of shipping, have become
parties to the Convention in accordance with Article 71…"

3
The IMO governing bodies are Assembly, which meets every two years and is open to
participation by all Member States, and the Council, which meets every six months. The Council is
the only elected body and has 40 Members.7
The technical and legal work of the Organization is carried out in committees and sub-
committees, which are open to participation by all Members. Intergovernmental and non-
governmental organizations, with specific competence and know-how, take active part in the work
of the Organization. Committees meet at regular intervals, on average every six months. ‘The main
committees are the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC), the Marine Environment Protection
Committee (MEPC), the Legal Committee (LC), the Facilitation Committee (FC) and the Technical
Co-operation Committee (TCC). In order to be implemented, the international conventions adopted
by the IMO must be accepted by States and incorporated by them into their national legislation.
From a legal perspective, it is then for the national administrations to make sure that ships flying
their flags comply with the requirements contained in the IMO treaties and non-treaty instruments.
Nonetheless, the IMO, by means of various techniques, actively encourages flag States to take the
necessary implementing action.
The IMO international conventions can be broadly divided into three main groups: those
concerning safety of navigation, those dealing with preventing and combating marine pollution, and
those regulating liability and compensation issues and other legal matters. In more recent years,
security has also been the focus of IMO treaties.

3. Safety Conventions8

Among the most important conventions adopted at IMO on safety and security of navigation are
the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, SOLAS 1974, which has been accepted
by 163 States with a combined merchant fleet represent 99.14 per cent of the world tonnage (the
International Ship and Port Facilities Security Code, ISPS was adopted in 2002 as an integral part
of SOLAS); the Load Lines Convention, LL 1966, which has been accepted by 161 countries,
whose fleets represent 99.13% of the world tonnage; the International Regulations for the
Prevention of Collisions at Sea, COLREG 1972, accepted by 157 States with 99.13% of the world
tonnage; the Convention on Standards of Training Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers,
STCW 1978, with 162 States Party and 99.18% of the world tonnage; and the Convention on
Maritime Search and Rescue SAR 1979, which has been accepted by 111 countries with 80.176 %
of the world tonnage.9
Other important legal treaties in the field of liability and compensation for damage at sea are the
Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, 1976, LLMC and the Athens
Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, 1974, PAL. IMO legal
treaties also include the International Convention on Salvage, 1989 (Salvage), the Convention for
the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 1988, SUA and the
Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the
Continental Shelf 1988, SUA PROT 1988. Both SUA and the Protocol were substantially amended
by IMO’s Legal Committee following the events of 11 September 2001. The amendments were
considered and adopted by an international legal conference convened by IMO from 10 to 14
7
The following States are Members of the Council for the 2014-2015 biennium. Category a): 10 States with the largest
interest in providing international shipping services: China, Greece, Italy, Japan, Norway, Panama, Republic of Korea,
Russian Federation, United Kingdom, United States. Category b): 10 other States with the largest interest in
international seaborne trade: Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, India, Netherlands, Spain,
Sweden. Category c): 20 States not elected under (a) or (b) above which have special interests in maritime transport or
navigation, and whose election to the Council will ensure the representation of all major geographic areas of the world:
Australia, Bahamas, Belgium, Chile, Cyprus, Denmark, Indonesia, Jamaica, Kenya, Liberia, Malaysia, Malta, Mexico,
Morocco, Peru, Philippines, Singapore, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey.
8
Nikčević Grdinić, J., (2015) Legal regulations in the function of ensuring ship safety, Pomorstvo: Scientific Journal of
Maritime Research, Vol.29 No.1 pp. 34-38.
9
As per data as of 5 June 2017.

4
October 2005.

4. Safety Codes

In addition to international conventions special importance to maritime safety have other legal
instruments adopted by IMO. Different terminology is adopted for their identification. These are
various resolutions, codes, standards, protocols, etc., which discuss about various issues such as:
design, construction and equipment of ships, issues related to the stability of the ship, fire
protection, radio communication, and transportation of cargo (including dangerous goods), security
management and maritime safety. These legal instruments are different from international
conventions (that contain principles, norms, standards, or other statements of expected behaviour)
and fall within the domain of soft law.10
There is a large number of codes on maritime safety which was adopted under the auspices of
IMO. Particularly important are the codes for the safe transport of cargo which regulate in detail
issues concerning the safe transport of cargo. In this respect particularly interesting are the general
codes, such as: CSS Code (Code of Safe Practice for Cargo Stowage and Securing) and IMSBC
Code (International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes Code). In contrast to the above codes, the codes
relating to the safe carriage of certain types of cargo by sea are also important. These are primarily:
carriage of grain, timber, as well as carriage of dangerous goods. These are the codes issued in this
sense: International Grain Code (International Code for the Safe Carriage of Grain in Bulk) and
Code of Safe Practice for Ships Carrying Timber Deck Cargoes. In relation to the carriage of
dangerous goods by sea, the most important ones are: IMDG code (International Maritime
Dangerous Goods, IBC code (International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships
carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk), IGC Code (International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk), INF Code (The International Code for the
Safe Carriage of Packaged Irradiated Nuclear Fuel, Plutonium and High Level Radioactive Wastes
on Board Ships). Also, we should not avoid ISM code (International Management Code for the
Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention) adopted by IMO in order to impact more
efficiently on human factor, and to provide higher maritime safety and to avoid maritime accidents.
11

4.1. Code of Safe Practice for Cargo Stowage and Securing, CSS Code

CSS Code was adopted by IMO Assembly on 6 November 1991. 74 CSS Code was adopted by
the Resolution A.714 (17). The use of CSS Rules is required since 1997. Almost all IMO
recommendations on cargo stowage were consolidated there. CSS Code consists of 7 chapters and
14 annexes. It applies to ...″cargoes carried on board ships (other than solid and liquid bulk
cargoes and timber stored on deck) and, in particular, to those cargoes whose stowage and
securing have proved in practice to create difficulties.″ 12
Considering the specific matter that was dealt with in the Code, it was relatively early amended.
The first significant amendment to the CSS code was made in 199413 which introduced a new
Annex 13 on Methods to assess the efficiency of securing arrangements for non standardized

10
The notion of soft law means not legally binding rules, as opposed to hard law relating to legally binding acts. But we
cannot apply this rule strictly in terms of codes that adopted by IMO, because many international conventions in their
particular provisions point to the mandatory application of the codes.
11
Experience shows that the human factor, that is, human error is one of the main causes of the accidents at sea. When
it comes to accidents and incidents at the sea, except in rare cases of force majeure, human activity is almost always
included. The omissions in the management of the ship were the main causes of accidents. It is believed that human
factor (error of the crew) is involved in 75% to 96% of maritime accidents. Rothblum, A., Human Error and Maritime
Safety, Maritime Human Factors Conference, Linthicum, MD, March 13-14., 2000.
12
Chapter 1 Article 1.1. of CSS Coda.
13
MSC/Circ.691

5
cargo.14 Amendments to Annex 12, on safe stowage and securing of unit loads, were made by
MSC/Circ.740, in June 1996. The next amendments of CSS Code were made by MSC in 2010.
MSC.1/Circ.1352. These amendments include the ne Annex 14 Guidance on Providing Safe
Working Conditions for Securing of Containers on Deck. The objective of the new Annex 14 is that
persons who are responsible for the performance of providing and taking security measures on the
containers transported on the deck of the ship, have safe working conditions, and in particular,
access to safe and appropriate equipment.

4.2. International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes Code, IMSBC code

IMSBC code is the basic code that regulates the transport of bulk solids. The Code does not apply
to grain. IMBC Code was first published in 1965 and since then it has been published for several
times. The original name of IMSBC Code was Code of Safe Practice for Solid Bulk Cargoes BC
Code).15 However, on 4 December 2008, IMO16 adopted new code for carriage of solid bulk cargoes
- IMSBC Code. The primary objective of IMSBC Code is to enable safe stowage and shipment of
solid bulk cargoes, providing information about the dangers certain shipments are exposed to and
instructions on procedures when sending such shipments. All ships are required to adhere to
IMSBC Code, regardless of the date of laying the keel and its gross register tonnage. IMSBC Code
became mandatory on 1 January 2011. The period between 1 January 2009 and 1 January 2011 was
left as a period to comply with the BC Code, and during this period the IMSBC Code was applied
on a voluntary basis.17 IMSBC Code, as well as BC Code categorizes the cargoes into three groups
A, B, and C. The more detailed requirements for each type of cargo are given in some parts of this
paper. In June 2013, IMO, namely MSC, adopted Resolution 354 (92) laying down amendments of
IMSBC Code. The Contracting Parties of the SOLAS Convention are able to apply amendments in
whole or in part from 1 January 2014 on a voluntary basis, while their mandatory application started
from 1 January 2015.

4.3. International Code for the Safe Carriage of Grain in Bulk, International Grain Code

International Grain Code is applied to grain. International Grain Code was adopted in May 1991
and contains detailed regulations on the carriage of grain in bulk. Its application is mandatory. Each
cargo ship carrying grain shall comply with the requirements of the International Grain Code and
must have the necessary documentation (approval) for such carriage. The ship without such a
document shall not be loaded with grain, until the commander does not receive such approval from
the authorities or until the government of the country in whose port the loading is done, confirms
that the ship meets the requirements of the International Grain Code. International Grain Code
replaced the Chapter VI SOLAS 1974, which regulated grain carriage in more detail.

4.4. Code of Safe Practice for Ships Carrying Timber Deck Cargoes, TDC code

14
In May 2002 important amendments were made in Annex 13, MSC/Circ 1026. Circular 1026 also includes an
extension on the scope of application recommending all lashing assemblies to be fixed to strong or fixed points, a new
table on friction coefficients and new texts on an advanced calculation method and an alternative method on balance of
forces.
15
BC Code provides guidelines to maritime administration, shipowners, shippers and other parties in relation to
standards applied to safe stowage and carriage of solid bulk cargoes, excluding grains which are subject to specific
rules. The primary purpose of the BC Code is to improve boarding and lodging of bulk cargoes in a way: to point out
the dangers which arise when loading, providing guidelines on the procedures to be applied, when it is intended to
embark bulk cargo, citing a list of cargo, which is regularly carried in bulk, description of the testing procedures, to
determine the properties of the cargoes carried in bulk.
16
Resolution MSC.268 (85)
17
However, shipping companies are aware that the Port State Control and port authorities of many states require the
proof of compliance with IMSBC Code, which should be available on board.

6
TDC Code was adopted by the IMO in 1972 and amended in 1978. The introduction of new
techniques and technologies in the maritime industry, the emergence of sophisticated ships imposed
the need to revise this Code. New code was adopted during the IMO seventeenth session in
November 1991, by Resolution A.715(17), in response to continuous victims that occurred when
moving wood and frequent losses of wood which are transported as cargo. The new Code revised
TDC Code from 1972. During its adoption special attention was paid to the construction of larger
and more sophisticated ships, as well as the introduction of new techniques for handling cargo. The
Code contains four chapters. Chapter 1 contains general provisions, Chapter 2 contains data on the
stability, Chapter 3 contains provisions on stowage and the last Chapter 4 contains provisions
concerning securing of timber deck cargoes. Although TDC Code was directed primarily at
providing recommendations for the safe transport of wood on the deck, it also contains an appendix
that consists of recommendations related to the stowage of wood under the deck. The Code was
amended by IMO Resolution A.1048-a (27), which was adopted on 30 November 2011.

4.5. International Maritime Dangerous Goods, IMDG code

At the SOLAS conference held in 1960, it was decided to regulate the carriage of dangerous
goods by the new international regulations that have been adopted by the IMO. In 1965 IMO for the
first time published the IMDG Code, which has become mandatory for all Member States of the
SOLAS Convention, from 1 January 2004. IMDG Code is an international act for the carriage of
dangerous goods by sea, which regulates their packaging, transport in containers and stowage, with
particular reference to the segregation of incompatible substances. This is a unique international
Code, which comes in addition to the rules of the SOLAS Convention. Although it was adopted
primarily for maritime carriage, it has a significant impact in other branches of carriage as well.
This Code is the basis for the adoption of the law and recommendations for the carriage of
dangerous goods. The goal of adoption of the IMDG Code is to improve safe carriage of dangerous
goods, to protect the marine environment, improve the free unlimited flow of dangerous goods with
the appropriate supporting documentation.18
IMDG Code is constantly updated, which means its constant evolving and amending. However,
its basic structure remains unchanged.
At its amending it was taken into account to include new dangerous goods, as well as new
technologies and methods of operation or handling of dangerous goods. Cargoes listed in the IMDG
regulations are dangerous goods. However, although some cargo is not listed in it, it does not mean
that it is not dangerous cargo. It is possible that states in their national legislation extend the list of
dangerous cargoes by other cargoes and thus include them in the regime of dangerous goods. In
addition, national legislation may provide for extra requirements to be met by ships carrying
dangerous goods when entering the port of the respective states. In any case, the existing national
regulations must be based on the IMDG Code. Given the fact that certain states prohibit the carriage
of certain dangerous goods through its territory or allow such a carriage, but in limited quantities, it
is very important for every shipping company to be familiar with the regulations of the countries
their ships sail to or pass through their sea. 19
In May 2000 MSC made amendments to the IMDG Code, which significantly changed its form.
The changes came into force on 1 January 2001. Pursuant to the amendments, IMDG Code now
consists of seven parts, two appendices and index. The parts IMDG regulations are: Part 1 - General
principles, definitions and training; Part 2 - Classification; Part 3 - Dangerous Goods List - DGL
exceptions to the limited amounts. DGL is the core of the IMDG Code and presents information on
the transport requirements in the coded form; Part 4 - Packing and tank provisions; Part 5 - The

18
Nikčević Grdinić, J., (2012) Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Sea, Import Part of the Maritime Transport,
Proc.of the 5th International Conference on Maritime Transport, 27th-29th June, Barcelona, Spain, pp.1038-1056.
19
For example, the Port of Singapore is known for its sensitivity to the passage of ships with dangerous cargo and
therefore has the strict rules contained in its port acts (Port of Singapore Authority Act Code).

7
consignment procedures; Part 6 - Construction and testing of packaging, medium sized bulk
containers, large packaging, portable tanks and road cisterns; Part 7 - Requirements relating to
transport operations. Appendices to IMDG Code are: Appendix A - contains the list of generic
goods and commodities that are not specified in other way and proper shipping names; Appendix B
- contains a brief glossary of terms.
According to IMDG Code dangerous goods are divided in nine classes: Class 1- Explosives
substances and articles; Class 2- Gases, compressed, liquefied or dissolved under pressure; Class 3-
Flammable liquids; Class 4- Flammable solids, liable to spontaneous combustion, or which, in
contact with water, emit flammable gases. Class 5- Oxidizing substances (which provoke
combustion) and organic peroxides which are subject to violent or explosive decomposition; Class
6- Toxic and infectious substances; Class 7- Radioactive materials; Class 8- Corrosive materials;
Class 9- Miscellaneous dangerous substances and articles such as aerosols, some ammonium nitrate
fertilizers, asbestos, safety matches and substances designed as marine pollutants. The purpose of
the classification given in the IMDG Code is the distinction between cargo that may be considered
dangerous for transporting and those which is not; detection of the risks that are described in the
transport of dangerous goods; provision of taking the necessary measures to effect the safe transport
of dangerous goods, without risk to people and property (during transport, as well as during the stay
in port and on board).
In May 2002 amendments to Chapter VII of the SOLAS Convention were adopted, according to
which from 1 January 2004, the IMDG Code was binding for all Member States of the SOLAS
Convention. In fact, from a legal standpoint, the IMDG Code is mandatory for all Member States of
the SOLAS Convention, but the fact is that some of its provisions are in the form of
recommendations. Specifically, the Code very often uses the word “should” instead of the word
“must”.

4.6. International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships carrying Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk, IBC code

IBC Code provides for the international standards for the safe carriage by sea of dangerous and
harmful liquid chemicals in bulk. In order to reduce the risks for ships, the crew and the marine
environment IBC Code prescribes the international requirements that must be met when it comes to
the design and construction of ships, as well as equipment which must be provided. IBC Code is
applied to all tankers carrying chemicals regardless of their size. Risks of chemicals are provided
therein, such as: fire danger, threat to human health, the risk of pollution of the sea, air and marine
environment, the risk of reactions with other chemicals and water. IBC Code provides that, after
examining the ship, she will be issued the international certificate for the carriage of dangerous
chemicals in bulk. The international certificate contains the information on the type of ship
according to the Code, cargoes that can be carried, additional requirements, exemptions, etc. All
dangerous liquids are classified into four categories: Category A - chemical substances that can
cause considerable danger to marine resources and human health; Category B - substances that can
cause certain dangers; Category C - substances that might cause less risk; Category D - substances
that can cause barely noticeable danger.
Ships built after 1986, carrying dangerous chemicals established by IBC Code, must comply with
its requirements in terms of design, construction and operation of ships.

4.7. International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied
Gases in Bulk, IGC code

IGC code was adopted by IMO Resolution MSC.5(48) on 17 June 1983. IGC code applies to gas
carriers constructed on or after 1 July 1986. Gas carriers constructed before that date should comply
with the requirements of the Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied

8
Gases in Bulk or the Code for Existing Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk. 20 The purposes of
these codes is to provide an international standard for the safe transport by sea in bulk of liquefied
gases and certain other substances, by prescribing the design and construction standards of ships
involved in such transport and the equipment they should carry so as to minimize the risk to the
ship, its crew and to the environment, having regard to the nature of the products involved.
The basic philosophy is one of ship types related to the hazards of the products covered by these
codes, each of which may have one or more hazard properties. A further possible hazard may arise
owing to the products being transported under cryogenic (refrigerated) or pressure conditions.
Severe collisions or strandings could lead to cargo tank damage and uncontrolled release of the
product. Such release could result in evaporation and dispersion of the product and, in some cases,
could cause brittle fracture of the ship's hull. The requirements in the codes are intended to
minimize these risks as far as is practicable, based upon present knowledge and technology.
According to section C of the Chapter VII of the SOLAS Convention, provisions of the IGC
Code are mandatory for all members of the SOLAS Convention. Taking into consideration the
development of techniques and technologies its amendments are taken into account as well. Its
amendments were adopted by the Resolution MSC.30 (61) on 11 December 1992. The IGC Code
published in 1993 has included the said amendments.

4.8. International Code for the Safe Carriage of Packaged Irradiated Nuclear Fuel, Plutonium
and High Level Radioactive Wastes on Board Ships, INF code

Ships carrying packaged irradiated nuclear fuel, plutonium and high-level radioactive waste such
products must be made in accordance with the requirements of the INF code. INF code determines
loads covered, also performs specification of ships carrying such cargo.21 The Code was adopted by
the Resolution MSC.88 (71) on 27 may 1999. Its application became mandatory from 1 January
2001 based on amendments adapted to the Chapter VII SOLAS entitled Carriage of dangerous
goods.
The INF code applies to all ships regardless of the date of construction and size, including cargo
ships of less than 500 gross tonnage, engaged in the carriage of INF cargo. The INF Code does not
apply to warships, naval auxiliary or other ships used only on government non-commercial service,
although Administrations are expected to ensure such ships are in compliance with the Code.
Special provisions of the Code relate to issues, including: damage stability, fire protection,
temperature control of cargo spaces, structural consideration, cargo securing arrangements,
electrical supplies, radiological protection equipment and management, training and shipboard
emergency plans.
Ships carrying INF cargo are classified into one of three classes, depending on the level of
radioactive cargoes carried. According INF Code there are ships classified as Class INF 1, INF 2
and INF 3.22 Before the start of the journey those ships must undergo a basic examination, which

20
Gas carriers constructed before that date should comply with the requirements of the Code for the
Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk or the Code for Existing Ships
Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk.
21
According to the Code, INF cargoes are packaged irradiated nuclear fuel, plutonium, high-level radioactive wastes in
accordance with the class 7 of the IMDG Code. Irradiated nuclear fuel - material containing uranium, thorium and/or
plutonium isotopes which has been used to maintain a self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction. Plutonium - the resultant
mixture of isotopes of that material extracted from irradiated nuclear fuel from reprocessing. High-level radioactive
wastes - liquid wastes resulting from the operation of the first stage extraction system or the concentrated wastes from
subsequent extraction stages, in a facility for reprocessing irradiated fuel, or solids into which such liquid wastes have
been converted.
22
Class INF 1 ship - Ships which are certified to carry INF cargo with an aggregate activity less than 4,000 TBq
(TeraBecquerel=measurement of radioactivity), Class INF 2 ship - Ships which are certified to carry irradiated nuclear
fuel or high-level radioactive wastes with an aggregate activity less than 2 x 106 TBq and ships which are certified to
carry plutonium with an aggregate activity less than 2 x 105 TBq and Class INF 3 ship - Ships which are certified to
carry irradiated nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive wastes and ships which are certified to carry plutonium with no
restriction of the maximum aggregate activity of the materials.

9
includes a detailed examination of its structure, equipment, appliances and built-in materials. Once
the authorized body announces the satisfactory results of the conducted inspection, it will issue to
the ship International Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of INF Cargo.
INF Code regulates the issue of ship's stability under the load. It, also, prescribes the duty of
every INF ship to have the Shipboard Emergency Plan. The plan must have: worked out procedure
for reporting an accident involving a ship carrying INF cargo, and the master or the officer on duty
must comply with it; the list of authorized persons to be informed of the accident; a detailed
description of the activities to be taken urgently by the person on board, in order to prevent, reduce
or control the release of hazardous substances; method of contacting the ship to facilitate
coordination of work between the ship and the local authorities.

4.9. International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution
Prevention, ISM code

In October 1989 IMO adopted by Resolution A.647(16), Guidelines on Management for the Safe
Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention. The purpose of the Guidelines is to provide
security, protect people from harm or loss of life and to avoid possible damage as much as possible.
The guidelines are based on general principles, with the aim to support the development and
management practices within the industry as a whole. The Guidelines have recognized the
importance of the existence of international instruments for safe operation of ships, as one of the
most important factors in preventing maritime accidents and pollution of the sea.
After a short experience in the application of the Guidelines, in 1993 IMO adopted by the
Resolution A741 (18) the ISM Code. After several years of practical experience, its importance was
recognized and it was considered that it should be mandatory. It was decided that the best way to
ensure it shall be through the amendments to the SOLAS Convention. Thus, on May 24, 1994 it was
added a new chapter IX of SOLAS Convention entitled Management for the Safe Operation of the
Ship, which consists of six rules. The Chapter IX does not include ISM Code is not included, but it
also states the obligation of its application.23 ISM Code entered into force in 1998 and it became
mandatory for ships. In order to ensure uniformity in the application of the ISM Code, in 1995 IMO
adopted by the Resolution A. 788 (19) the Guidelines on the Implementation of the International
Safety Management (ISM) Code by Administrations. These are the guidelines for implementing the
requirements of Chapter IX of SOLAS and ISM Code. The guidelines were revised first in
November 2001 by the Resolution A.913 (22), and then again in December 2009 by the Resolution
A.1022 (26).24
The ISM Code provides that its requirements can be applied to all ships.25 However, Rule 2 of the
Chapter IX of the SOLAS Convention states that the ISM Code applies to the following ships:
cruise ships, including high speed cruise ships, which were built before 1 July 1998; tankers,
chemical tankers, gas carriers, bulk cargo carriers and high speed carriers of 500 gross tonnage or
more, which were built before 1 July 1998; other cargo ships and mobile offshore drilling units
(MODUs) of 500 gross tonnage or more, which were built before 1 July 2002.
The ISM Code has introduced a system for the safe operation (conduct) of ships (Safety
Management System), so called SMS system. This system needs to be established by a shipping
company, and it means to take all actions aimed at planning, organizing and carrying out of the
tasks of the shipping company and ship on the mainland and at sea. SMS system, for the first time
covered the ship and the company in accordance with the ISM Code.
The ISM Code clearly states that the SMS system should ensure the observance and compliance
23
The Rule 3.1. of the Chapter IX of the SOLAS Convention.
24
In order to better understand and implement the ISM Code, certain guidelines have been adopted, such as: Guidelines
for the operational implementation of the International Safety Management Code by Companies, MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.5;
Guidance on the qualifications, training and experience necessary for undertaking the role of the designated person
under the provisions of the International Safety Management Code, MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.6; Guidance on near-miss
reporting, MSC-MEPC.7/Circ.7. ISM Code and Guidelines on implementation of ISM Code, IMO, 2010.
25
The Rule 1.3. of the ISM Code.

10
with the rules, regulations, the guidelines; the applicability of many regulations (the Codes); taking
into account the recommended standards of various organizations, administrations, classification
societies and the entire maritime industry.
The ISM Code includes the functional requirements for the SMS system. It is pointed out that
every company should develop, implement and enforce the SMS system, which includes the
following requirements: a policy of safety of navigation and protection of the environment;
guidelines and procedures for the ship's safe navigation and protection of the environment;
determining the level of authority and means of communication between the coast and the crew on
board; procedures for reporting accidents and non-conformities of the established system with the
ISM Code; procedures for emergency situations; procedures for internal control and inspections of
the functioning of the established ISM Code; registration system for passenger data.26
To ensure the safe operation of each ship and to provide a link between the company and the
persons on board each ship company, if necessary, should determine the specific person or persons
ashore having direct access to the highest levels of management (Designated Persons Ashore-Dpa).
This person is responsible for monitoring the safety and protection of the environment of each ship,
and the establishment of appropriate supporting resources from the mainland.
The ISM Code provides for the company to be responsible for the implementation of its
requirements. In this case the term ″Company″ means the owner of the ship or any other
organization or person such as the Manager, or the Bareboat Charterer, who has assumed the
responsibility for operation of the ship from the Ship-owner and who on assuming such
responsibility has agreed to take over all the duties and responsibility imposed by the Code. 27 In this
sense it is pointed out that:

The Company should ensure:


- That the shipmaster is properly qualified for commanding and fully aware of the SMS system of
the company. Also, the company must give adequate support, to the shipmaster in order he can
perform safely his duties:
- That each ship is managed by a qualified, authorized and medically fit crew, according to the
national and international requirements;
- Procedures to provide new staff and staff who are transferred to the new duties are familiar with
the subject of security and protection of the environment. Basic guidelines to be established and
implemented prior to departure and the appropriate documentation should be issued in relation to
the same;
- That the personnel involved in the Company's SMS fully understands the rules, regulations,
policies and guidelines;
- Implementing the procedures, identifying the additional training in order to improve the SMS
system, as well as ensuring the implementation of appropriate training and involvement of all staff
in them;
- The procedures by which the ship staff will receive the necessary information regarding the
SMS system in the working language or a language they understand;
26
In Montenegro, provisions on the safety management system for ships are provided in Article 50 of the Law on
Safety of Maritime Navigation. The Article clearly states that ship owner, i.e. company shall be obliged to apply and
maintain safety management system, in accordance with the SOLAS Convention (Chapter IX) and ISM Code, which
contains the following: policy of safety of navigation and protection of the environment; instructions and procedures for
the safe navigation of the ship and protection of the environment; define the level of authorization and method of
communication between the coast and the crew on board; procedures for reporting incidents and inconsistencies of the
established system with the ISM Code; procedures for emergency situations; procedures for internal control and
inspections of functioning of established ISM Code; system for registration of passengers’. In the same Article,
paragraph.2 it is emphasized that, in order to ensure safe navigation of their vessels and establish a connection with the
company and the persons on board, the ship owner i.e. the company shall be obliged to appoint the person on the coast
responsible for the control of the safe navigation of ships and protection of the environment.
27
the Law on Safety of Maritime Navigation of Montenegro, in Article 6 item.14 gives a definition of the „company“.
Accordingly, a company means owner of the ship or other natural person or legal entity (manager, or charterer) who
undertakes the responsibility for ship navigation in accordance with the International Safety Management Code.

11
- The staff of the ship to be capable and efficient in carrying out their duties, which relate to the
SMS system.
The ISM Code set forth the obligations of the flag State of the ship. Namely, when it is
determined that the shipping company or the ship, met the requirements of the ISM Code, i.e. the
SMS system in accordance with the ISM Code, the competent administration of the flag State or
other recognized authority (it is possible to delegate authority or organization, more commonly it is
a classification society), issues to the ship: DOC (Document of Compliance), which a shipping
company receives as evidence that the SMS complies with the ISM Code; Certificate of safe
operation of the ship, SMC (Safe Management Certificate) which confirms that the ship carries out
all operations in accordance SMS system.
The amendments to the ISM regulations were carried out in December 2000 by the Resolution
MSC.104 (73). The amendments came into force on 1 July 2002. In December 2004 by the
Resolution MSC. 179 (79). The amendments came into force on 1 July 2006. In May 2005 by the
Resolution MSC. 195 (80). The amendments came into force on 1 January 2009. ISM Code was
amended in December 2008 by the Resolution MSC. 273 (85). The resolution was adopted on
January 1, 2010 and the amendments entered into force on 1 July 2010.

5. Conclusion

From the perspective of law, the safety is a condition without which it is not permitted to
perform the navigation. The IMO, as a leader in providing safe navigation, from its inception until
today, seeks, by taking numerous actions and measures to provide the minimum conditions
necessary for safe navigation and safe stay in the sea. The adoption of international instruments,
conventions, i.e. codes, or more precisely, their implementation into national laws is essential for
the promotion of safe navigation. Numerous are the international codes which the IMO has issued
and which, we could say, represent a supplement to international conventions. General regulations
related to safe cargo transport CSS code and IMSBC Code are of particular importance, followed
by special regulations related to safe transport of certain types of cargo, International Grain Code
and TDC Code as well as regulations relating to the transport of dangerous goods by sea - IMDG
Code, IBC Code, IGC Code and INF Code. Flag states, i.e. shipping companies, are obliged to
strictly adhere to the requirements of international instruments, i.e. codes, which actually represent
the basis of their legislation. To this end it is necessary that states, through their national legislation,
separately regulate a number of issues relating to safe transport of certain types of cargo, and not to
refer to application of international codes in principle. It is therefore important to particularly pay
attention to the adoption of manuals that would regulate procedures in detail when it comes to safe
handling different types of cargo and then organize training and certificate issuance for handling
and transport of various types of cargo, as well as prediction of restrictive measures in national law.

12
References

Arroyo, D.W. (1991), International maritime conventions, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers,
Deventer (Netherlands).
Boisson, P. (1999) Safety at Sea: Policies, Regulations & International Law, Bureau Veritas,
Paris.
Bolanča, D. (2002) Maritime Law In the Era of Globalisation-Universal Law or A Mixed Legal
System? Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 67(3-4), pp. 333-338.
Bolanča, D. (1999) Pomorsko pravo (odabrane teme), Split.
Brodie, P. (2013) Dictionary of Shipping Terms, 6th Edition, Informa Law from
Routledge.
Chorley & Giles (1977) Shipping Law, 8 ed., London.
Christodoulou Varotsi, I. (2009) Maritime Safety Law and Policies of the European Union
and the United States of America: Antagonism or Synergy? Springer.
Goran Belamaric, G. (2012) ISM KODEKS & SMS STANDARD, Pomorski fakultet, Split.
Grabovac, I. (2002) Doprinos nekih međunarodnih konvencija sigurnosti plovidbe. Pomorski
zbornik, Rijeka 40(1), pp. 429-444.
Grabovac, I. (1995) Pomorsko pravo i medjunarodne konvencije, Split.
Grabovac, I. (2001) Pomorsko upravno i javno pravo, Split.
Grabovac I. (2009) International contracts as a base for harmonizing maritime law – in relation to
the Law on Amendments to the Maritime Code, 2008, Collection of Works of the Faculty of Law
in Split, Vol. 46 (2), pp. 261 - 269.
Ivošević, B. (2008) Saobraćajno pravo, Pravni fakultet Univerzitet UNION, Beograd.
Kristiansen, S. (2013) Maritime transportation: safety management and risk analysis. Routledge.
Kiperaš, Ž. (1996) ISM kodeks – Primjena od strane države zastave, Uporedno pomorsko pravo,
br.1-4, Jadranski Zavod, Hrvatske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti, Zagreb.
Kopacz, Z., Morgas, W., & Urbanski, J. (2001). The maritime safety system, its main components
and elements. The Journal of Navigation, 54(02), pp.199-211.
Nikčević Grdinić, J., (2015) Legal regulations in the function of ensuring ship safety, Pomorstvo:
Scientific Journal of Maritime Research, Vol.29 No.1 pp. 34-38.
Nikčević Grdinić, J., (2012) Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Sea, Import Part of the
Maritime Transport, Proc.of the 5th International Conference on Maritime Transport, 27th-29th
June, Barcelona, Spain, pp.1038-1056.
Nikčević Grdinić J., (2016) Pravni aspekti pomorske sigurnosti, Institut za pomorsko pravo,
Beograd.
Li, K. X., Ng, Jim Mi (2002) International Maritime Conventions: Seafarers' Safety and Human
Rights, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 33(3) pp. 381-395
Luttenberger, A. (2005) Postupak donošenja i oživotvorenja konvencija iz pomorske sigurnosti
Medjunarodne pomorske organizacije, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, God. 42 .
(79.), Split.
Milošević Pujo, B. (2006) Pomorsko pravo (Odabrane temo po STCW konvenciji), Sveučilište u
Dubrovniku.
Pavić, D. (2001) Pravni učinci primjene ISM kodeksa na ograničenje odgovornosti brodara,
Uporedno pomorsko pravo, 40 (155), pp. 57-70.
Ringbom, H., (2008) European Union Maritime Safety Policy and International Law. Vol. 64.
BRILL.
Rothblum, A., (2000) Human Error and Maritime Safety, Maritime Human Factors Conference,
Linthicum, MD, March 13-14.
Yang, Z. L., Wang, J., & Li, K. X. (2013). Maritime safety analysis in retrospect. Maritime Policy
& Management, 40(3), 261-277.
Zec, D. (2001) Sigurnost na moru, Pomorski fakultet u Rijeci, Rijeka.

13
Weintrit, A. (2009) Marine navigation and safety of sea transportation, CRC Press.

14

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy