Construction of New Terminal Building at VARANASI Airport
Construction of New Terminal Building at VARANASI Airport
Construction of New Terminal Building at VARANASI Airport
AIRPORT
CONDITIONS OF CONVENANTS
Settlement of Disputes
It is agreed by both of the parties that all the difference or
disputes arising out of the Agreement of touching the subject
matter of the Agreement shall be decided by process of
settlement by Dispute Resolution Mechanism and Arbitration, as
specified in CLAUSE 57 of the General Condition of the Contract at
page GCC-43 & 44 and the provision of the India Arbitration
Act.1996 shall apply and Delhi Court alone shall have exclusive
jurisdiction over the same.
Scheduled “E”
Sl Description Applicable to this
No Contract
.
1. Name of Work “Construction of New
Terminal Building at
Varanasi Airport”
2. Estimated Cost Rs. 6498.00 lacs
3. Time allowed for execution of work 15 Months
4. Accepting Authority Chairman of AAI
5. Last Date of application 27-04-2007
6. Cost of tender documents 10000/-
7. Period of sale pf tender documents 29-05-07 to 31-05-07
8. Last date & time of receipt of tender 21-06-07 up to 15:00
documents hrs
9. Date and time of opening of tenders 21-06-07 at 15:30 hrs
10 Earnest Money Total Rs. 89,98,000/-
. only in the form of
DD/BG from any
Scheduled Banks but
not from any co
operative and Gramin
Bank in favour of
Airports Authority of
India.
11 Security deposit Shall be
. deducte@10% from
RA bills till it reaches
5% of accepted
contact value of work.
Security deposit shall
be acceptable in the
form of BG issued by
Schedule Banks only if
the security deposit is
more than 5 lacs.
12 Market rate percentage addition to 10.00 percent
. cover overheads and profit.
CPWD,DSR:
LIST OF MEMBER BANKS
• The concession agreements for the projects have been signed with the National Highways
Authority Ltd. The total project cost is estimated at Rs 1300 crores and involves six laning of
16 km stretch and four laning of the remaining stretches. The concession periods are 20 and
25 years for the two projects respectively, including 30 months of construction period. The
contracts have been awarded through a competitive bidding process.s
• Lanco has also won a Rs 1,000 crore contract for constructing a portion of the Aligarh to
Kanpur section of the National Highway in Uttar Pradesh. Lanco had emerged as successful
bidder for two-laning of Aligarh to Kanpur section of NH 91 from 140 km to 418.16 km on toll
basis of National Highway Authorities of India (NHAI). The project involves two-laning with
paved shoulders of existing road, repair, widening and reconstruction of 3 major and 29 minor
bridges, construction of 5 new rail over-bridges, 4 toll plazas and other wayside amenities.
The concession period for the project is 12 years including a construction period of 18 months.
• 1015 MW Imported Coal –based Power Project of Udipi Power Corporation Ltd at Udupi
in Karnataka.
• 2 x 300 MW Coal-based Power Project of LANCO Amarkantak Power Ltd at Pathadi near
Korba in Chhattisgarh.
• 4 X 125 MW Teesta VI Hydro Electric Project of LANCO Energy Pvt Ltd in Sikkim
• 2 X 600 MW Thermal Power Project of LANCO Anpara Power Ltd in Uttar Pradesh.
• Lanco is executing the construction of New Terminal for Varanasi Airport for the Airports
Authority of India.
Orders Executed
• Rs 293 crore Veeranam water supply transmission pipeline work in Tamil Nadu, India in a
record time using 1.7 m to 1.8 m dia pipes covering a distance of 114 km. This project was
executed with Punchak as a Joint Venture Partner.
• Four Laning of the National Highway 31 from Kishangunj to Islampur in West Bengal.
• Construction of 1st phase of 100 bed hospital, college and hostel complex etc at National
Institute of Unani Medicine Bangalore
Lanco's property development is all set to change the skyline of major metros with some of
the finest mixed property townships and realty projects incorporating state of the art features
and amenities.
.
.
.
Awards
National Award for Excellence in Water Management 2005 by Cll - GBC Green Business
Centre.
Silver Award in Gas Power Sector for Outstanding Achievement in Environment Management
for 2003-04 from Greentech Foundation.
2007
PRSI National Award for House Journal (English) - First Prize
PRSI National Award for Corporate Film in English - First Prize
PRSI National Award for Corporate Brochure - First Prize
2006
PRSI National Award for In- House Magazine (Content and Layout)–Second Prize
PRSI National Award for Corporate Campaign - Second Prize
PRSI National Award for Corporate Brochure - Second Prize
2005
PRSI National Award for In-House Magazine (Content and Layout)-Third Prize
PRSI State (Andhra Pradesh) Award for In- House Magazine (Content and Layout) - Second
Prize.
CSR
Objectives
The endeavor of LANCO Foundation in all its activities is to achieve tangible outcomes in every
sphere of Corporate Social Responsibility. The foundation has taken enlightened development
paradigms into consideration and is aligned with Millennium Development Goals and the UN Global
Compact Charter.
Lanco Foundation focuses its activities in seven sectors, including Education – Health – Livelihoods
– Environment - Neighbourhood Community Development - Relief & Rehabilitation, and - Sports &
Culture
Education Sector
In the Education sector - Lanco Foundation provides
scholarships on merit and means basis - to enrol and
complete the education at undergraduate and graduate levels.
These scholarships essentially intended to support merit
students in the neighbourhood communities of LANCO.
Health Sector:
In the Health sector, Lanco Foundation provides safe
drinking water - through tube wells - support urban health
initiatives - organise health awareness and screening camps -
including cancer awareness in rural areas in collaboration
with the Indo-American Cancer Institute & Research centre.
Livelihood Sector
In the livelihood sector, Lanco Foundation provides
employability training programmes in construction trades in
collaboration with the National Academy of Construction-
like rod fixing, shuttering carpentry, masonry for school
dropouts – and also conducts training programmes in other
areas like Information and Communication Technology -
bedside patient care - customer relations and sales –
hospitality - motor mechanics etc. in collaboration with Aide
et Action. An impressive number of over 1000
youth have so far been trained and gainfully employed. Lanco Foundation also provides
support to rural artisans - to improve their incomes through improvements in production –
marketing - and cooperative functioning.
Environment Sector
In the Environment sector, Lanco Foundation encourages
planting of trees - and organises awareness building activities
in both rural and urban areas.
Initially presented by Richards and Laughlin ( 1980); the cash conversion period is
now routinely discussed in most corporate finance textbooks. (See for example,
Brigham and Gapenski (1997), Moyer, McGuigan, and Kretlow (1998), and Gitman
(1998.) The cash conversion period measures the number of days between the
actual expenditure of the firm's cash for the purchase of productive resources and
the ultimate collection of cash from product sales. Incorporated within the cash
conversion period model are management issues involving the control of
inventories, the collection of receivables, and the timing of payments for productive
resources such as materials and labor. In the cash conversion model, increases in
the number of days a product remains in inventory, increases in the number of days
required to collect receivables following the point of sale, and decreases in the
number of days a firm takes to meet its trade credit obligations will increase the
firm's cash conversion period. The increased cash conversion period reflects
additional resources required in the form of working capital to maintain the firm's
operations.
A weakness of the cash conversion period model is its inability to clearly convert the
number of days in the conversion period to a dollar amount of needed working
capital. Additionally, the model does not reflect the distinction between cash sales
and credit sales. For instance, two firms may have the same receivables conversion
period but have different credit sales/total sales ratios.
In the standard cash conversion period model (all else the same) both firms would
have the.same cash conversion period. However, the firm with the lower credit
sales/total sales ratio would clearly be in a better position to meet obligations as
they come due since a larger portion of its sales are collected sooner and with
greater certainty.
Further, the cash conversion period model does not reflect the effect of profitability
on liquidity. As the model focuses on the length of time between the expenditure of
resources to produce operating revenue and the actual receipt of the revenue, it
fails to recognize that the revenue received will exceed the expenditure by the
amount of profit earned. Since the profit represents additional resources available
to meet obligations, profitability is clearly a contributing factor to overall corporate
liquidity. As shown later, the gross profit margin and the credit sales/total sales ratio
can be incorporated into the cash conversion period model. The modified cash
conversion period can then be easily converted to dollar amount of working capital
needed to sustain the firm's operating cycle. This amount of net working capital
required for operations (NWCROP) would then serve as input in an assessment of
overall corporate liquidity.
Shulman and Cox (1985) and Shulman and Dambolena (1986) developed a useful
tool for liquidity analysis known as Net Liquid Balance (NLB). Essentially, the NLB
model recognizes that the firm's ability to meet its obligations as they come due is
not reflected by the firm's total working capital, but by the amount of working
capital remaining once the requirements of the firm's operating cycle are met.
Alternatively, the NLB is the difference between the firm's immediately available
cash resources and its non-operating, or negotiated, short-term debt. Empirical
tests conducted by Shulman and Dambolena indicate the NLB to be a superior
indicator of corporate liquidity when compared to more widely known indicators
such as the quick ratio. A problem with the NLB model is that the NLB is a residual
amount remaining after the working capital needed to sustain the firm's operating
cycle (NWCROP) is deducted from total working capital. Hence, a means of
estimating the amount of working capital needed to sustain the operating cycle is
needed to make liquidity analysis using NLB operational. As shown below, NWCROP
can be estimated using the modified cash conversion period model and then used
as an input to the NLB model thereby improving the effectiveness of the NLB model
in assessing corporate liquidity.
The traditional cash conversion period (CCP) and its components can be
presented as follows:
(1) CCP = ICP RCP - PDP
The modified cash conversion period (MCCP) is obtained by modifying the inventory
conversion period to incorporate the gross profit margin and the receivables
conversion period to incorporate the credit sales/total sales ratio.
Figure 2 shows the relationship between NWCROP and the credit sales/total sales
ratio (CS/S). As the CS/S ratio increases, additional working capital is required. This
is intuitively obvious since a higher CS/S ratio results in more receivables for a given
sales level. Working Capital Requirements and Profitability
Figure 3 shows the relationship between NWCROP and the firm's gross profit
margin. As the gross profit margin increases the need for working capital to support
operations decreases. Incorporating profitability helps to make the cash conversion
period a better indicator of liquidity. The traditional CCP failed to recognize that the
cash inflow at the conclusion on the operating cycle is greater than the cash outflow
at the beginning of the cash conversion period. The incremental amount of cash
flow between the start and end of the cash conversion cycle is directly related to
profitability. The modified CCP incorporates the effect of the additional cash
resources made available by the generation of earnings from the firm's operating
cycle. Clearly, the more profitable the enterprise, the more cash resources
generated from soperations.
The Net Liquid Balance approach to assessing corporate liquidity divides the firm's
total working capital into the portion required to sustain the firm's operations and
the firm's surplus cash resources or Net Liquid Balance (NLB). A positive value for
NLB indicates that the firm has sufficient cash resources to meet its short-term
obligations without reducing the resources allocated to the operating cycle. A
negative value for NLB indicates that the firm will have to acquire additional
working capital or reduce the resources committed to the operating cycle to meet
short-term obligations. If the components of the MCCP are considered to be at
optimal levels, reducing resources committed to the operating cycle may result in
lost sales, less operating efficiency, and/or a deterioration in relations with trade
creditors. All of these are symptoms of a firm with liquidity problems.
Financial managers and analysts can use the NLB as a measure of the firm's current
or expected future liquidity. The level of working capital necessary to support
operations (NWCROP) can be estimated for current or expected sales levels using
optimal values for the components of MCCP. The desired level of NWCROP can then
be compared to the firm's actual net working capital. If desired NWCROP exceeds
available working capital (NLB
Conclusion
The purpose of the paper is to integrate two tools of liquidity management; the cash
conversion period and the net liquid balance. The traditional cash conversion model
was modified to incorporate the effects of the firm's profitability and credit
sales/total sales ratio. The modified cash conversion period was then used to
estimate the working capital needed to support the firm's operating cycle
(NWCROP). The optimal level of NWCROP, when compared with available working
capital provides an indication of the surplus or deficit position of the firm with
respect to available resources not committed to the operating cycle. A surplus or
rising amount of available resources is an indicator of adequate or improving
liquidity for the firm.
• BIBLIOGRAPHY