Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 130 views

    Pareto Analysis of Aircraft Defects

    Uploaded by

    nishat529
    The document analyzes defects reported for 55 aircraft using a Pareto chart. It shows that the top 3 most frequent defects were powerplant/engine problems at 17 instances (30.91% of total), flight data monitoring system malfunctions at 9 instances (16.36% of total), and instrumental/indication errors also at 9 instances (16.36% of total). These 3 defects accounted for over 63% of all reported defects. The Pareto chart also visually depicts that a small number of defect types accounted for the vast majority of issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Pareto Analysis of Aircraft Defects

    Uploaded by

    nishat529
    130 views4 pages
    The document analyzes defects reported for 55 aircraft using a Pareto chart. It shows that the top 3 most frequent defects were powerplant/engine problems at 17 instances (30.91% of total), flight data monitoring system malfunctions at 9 instances (16.36% of total), and instrumental/indication errors also at 9 instances (16.36% of total). These 3 defects accounted for over 63% of all reported defects. The Pareto chart also visually depicts that a small number of defect types accounted for the vast majority of issues.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document analyzes defects reported for 55 aircraft using a Pareto chart. It shows that the top 3 most frequent defects were powerplant/engine problems at 17 instances (30.91% of total), flight data monitoring system malfunctions at 9 instances (16.36% of total), and instrumental/indication errors also at 9 instances (16.36% of total). These 3 defects accounted for over 63% of all reported defects. The Pareto chart also visually depicts that a small number of defect types accounted for the vast majority of issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    130 views4 pages

    Pareto Analysis of Aircraft Defects

    Uploaded by

    nishat529
    The document analyzes defects reported for 55 aircraft using a Pareto chart. It shows that the top 3 most frequent defects were powerplant/engine problems at 17 instances (30.91% of total), flight data monitoring system malfunctions at 9 instances (16.36% of total), and instrumental/indication errors also at 9 instances (16.36% of total). These 3 defects accounted for over 63% of all reported defects. The Pareto chart also visually depicts that a small number of defect types accounted for the vast majority of issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    Pareto Analysis of Aircraft Defects

    Aircraft Defects Frequency Cumulative Defect Percentage


    Powerplant/Engine problem 17 17 30.91
    Flight Data Monitoring System Malfunction 9 26 16.36
    Instrumental/ Indication error 9 35 16.36
    Electrical System 6 41 10.91
    Air Conditioning System Malfunction 3 44 5.45
    Pitot Static System Defect 2 46 3.64
    Pneumatic System Defect 1 47 1.82
    AFCS Malfunction 1 48 1.82
    Aircraft Structural Problem 1 49 1.82
    Hydraulic System Defect 1 50 1.82
    Landing Gear related problem 1 51 1.82
    Fuel System 1 52 1.82
    Control system problem 1 53 1.82
    Pressurization System Malfunction 1 54 1.82
    Navigation System Problem 1 55 1.82
    Total Defects 55

    Pareto Analysis of Aircraft Defects


    18
    98.2 100 100
    92.74 94.56 96.38
    90.92 90
    16 87.28 89.1
    83.64 85.46
    14
    80 80
    74.54
    70
    12
    63.63
    60
    10
    50
    47.27
    8
    40
    6
    30.91 30

    4
    20

    2 10

    0 0

    Frequency Cumulative Defect Percentage


    Frequency Cumulative Defect Percentage
    efects
    Cumulative Defect Percentage
    30.91
    47.27
    63.63
    74.54
    80
    83.64
    85.46
    87.28
    89.1
    90.92
    92.74
    94.56
    96.38
    98.2
    100

    100 100
    96.38 98.2
    92.74 94.56
    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy