Sale of Goods Act 1930 Smart Notes PDF
Sale of Goods Act 1930 Smart Notes PDF
Sale of Goods Act 1930 Smart Notes PDF
SECTION 1:
COMMENCEMENT AND APPLICABLE
APPLICABILITY OF THE ACT
⇒ This act extends to whole of India, except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
⇒ The word Indian was omitted the title of the Act in 1963 (22 sept.)
⇒ This Act does not deal with the sale of immovable property.
⇒ The transaction relating to immovable properties, e.g., the sale, lease, gifts, etc.,
are governed by a separate Act known as ‘Transfer of Property Act, 1882’. This
Act is beyond the scope of this book.
DEFINITIONS (Sec. 2)
Section 2(4) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 recognizes the following as
documents of title to goods:
86
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
(viii) Any other document used in the ordinary course of business as document of
title (as described in the preceding paragraph).
A document of title enables a person named therein to transfer the property by mere
endorsement and delivery, whereas a document showing title does not confer any right to
transfer by way of endorsement and delivery.
For example, a share certificate shows that the person named therein is entitled to the
shares represented by it, but does not allow transfer of the shares by mere endorsement
and delivery of the certificate.
⇒ stock and shares, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of
land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale.
⇒ You may notice that ‘money’ and ‘actionable claims’ have been expressly
excluded from the term ‘goods’. ‘Money’ means the legal tender. ‘Money’ does
not include old coins and foreign currency. They can, therefore, be sold or
bought as goods. Sale and purchase of foreign currency is, however, also
regulated by the foreign Exchange Management Act,
⇒ ‘Actionable claims’, like debts, are things which a person cannot make use of, but
which can be claimed by him by means of a legal action. Actionable claims
cannot be sold or purchased like goods, they can only be assigned, as per the
provisions of Transfer of property Act.
⇒ Grass, growing crops, trees to be cut and their log wood to be delivered, malba of
a building to be demolished, etc. are goods. Similarly, things like goodwill,
copyright, trade mark, patents, water, gas electricity are all goods and may be the
subject matter of a contract of sale.
Agreement to sell
⇒ Where transfer of property in goods takes place at future date.
Sale
⇒ Where transfer of property in goods takes place at the time of contract.
87
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
• Partners are not regarded as separate persons for the purpose of sale of the
partnership property. They are the joint owners of the goods and as such they
cannot be both sellers and buyers [State of Gujarat v. Ramanlal S & W.
(1965)]. But, a partner may buy goods from the firm or sell goods to the firm.
⇒ There must be price involved. Price means money consideration for sale of
goods.
• Exchange of goods for goods is barter.
• If Exchange is for partly goods and partly for money it is sale.
Formation. The contract of sale may provide for any of the following methods.
• Immediate delivery of goods.
• Immediate payment of price but delivery at some future date.
• Immediate payment of price and immediate delivery of goods.
• Delivery or payment or both made in installments.
• Delivery or payment or both will be made at future date.
⇒ Property means general property in goods and not merely special property in goods. It
means ownership of goods. Special property in goods means possession of goods.
88
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
Applicable Act Sale of goods Act, 1930 Hire Purchase Act, 1972
Parties Buyer and seller Hirer and Hire vendor
How it made? Orally or in writing Only in writing – Valid
Transfer of ownership Immediately buyer becomes When hirer paid last installment
owner of goods
Risk of loss Ownership not transferred hire
Risk of loss passes to buyer
vendor is liable
Return of goods Buyer can’t return goods Anytime terminate agreement and
return
Legal effect of Buyer remain liable to pay Each installment paid is treated as
Installment unpaid installment only hire charges
Sale tax Payable immediately When all installment is paid
Sale Bailment
Transfer of property in goods for price Delivery of goods for specific purpose that it
will be returned to bailor or disposed of as per
his direction
Property is transferred It remains with bailor.
Consideration is in form of price, i.e., money Gratuitous bailment is possible
89
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
⇒ Some contract involves use of both service and goods. This type of contract is considered
as contract for work and skill.
⇒ This kind of contract involves exercise of skill and labour by one party on some goods or
materials supplied by other party or supplied by party who exercise skill and labour for
price. It is immaterial who supply material. Alternatively, it can be said that in this kind
of contract, main purpose is to exercise work and skill. Supply of own goods is only
subsidiary. Intension of parties is to transfer goods only after exercise of some skill and
labour.
⇒ As it is not falling within categories of contract for Sale no sales tax is payable.
Example:
(1) A dentist agreed to supply a set of artificial teeth to a patient. The material was
wholly found by the dentist. Held, it was a contract for the sale of goods.
(2) An artist was asked to paint a portrait. The material was supplied by the party and
not by the painter. It was held to be a contract for work and labour and not of
sale.
CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS
GOODS
Types of Goods
Existing goods
• Existing goods are the goods, which are owned and possessed by the seller at the time of
sale. Existing goods may be of three types;
• These goods are merely described by the parties at the time of contract of sale.
⇒ Future goods are those goods, which do not exist at the time of the contract of sale.
⇒ These goods are to be manufactured or acquired by the seller after the making of the
contract of sale.
⇒ Future goods cannot be sold, but there can only be an agreement to sell.
Example:
A, a manufacturer agrees to sell 5 tables and 50 chairs to B at Rs.10,000. B agrees to
purchase it. However, tables and chairs are yet to manufactured by A.
Contingent goods
Example:
A agrees to sell the goods loaded on the ship “Titanic”, which is coming from London to
Bombay. The ship may or may not arrive. So, these goods will be called as contingent
goods.
Basis Futures Goods Contingent Goods
1. Meaning Goods that are yet to be Goods, the acquisition of which by the
manufactured produced or acquired Seller depends upon a contingency,
by the Seller after making contract of which may or may not happen.
sale.
2. Element of Acquisition of Future Goods does The procurement of Contingent Goods
uncertainty not depend upon and uncertainty. is dependent upon an uncertain event.
3. Scope Future Goods do not include They are wider in scope, it includes
contingent Goods because of the future Goods.
element of certainty.
4. Effect of Where by a contract of Sale, the There may be a “Contract for Sale” of
Contract Seller purports to effect a present Goods, the acquisition of which by the
sale of future Goods, the contract Seller depends upon a contingency
operates as an “agreement to sell” which may or may not happen [Sec.6
the Goods[Sec.6(3)] (2)]
5. Example B agrees to buy the entire crop of A agrees to sell to B a certain painting
wheat that would yield in S’s farm, only if C, its present owner, sells it to
at the rate of Rs.1000 per quintal. him. The sale is contingent upon the
sale by C.
91
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
⇒ Price is specified under the contract. It is the most common method of determining the
price. Here, parties decide the price in advance.
⇒ Price may be determined in accordance to custom and usage of trade. This method is
applicable if parties regularly trade.
⇒ Where the price is not fixed as above, the buyer shall pay the seller a reasonable price.
‘What is a reasonable price is a question of fact and circumstances.
If third party fails to specify, contract is void but if goods are delivered to buyer and used by
him, he is required to pay reasonable price.
If the third party is prevented from fixing price, defaulting party is liable for the damages.
The consequences of destruction of specific goods can be discussed under the following three
heads:
⇒ If goods perish before making the contract
• Contract is void – ab – initio, due to mistake as to existence of subject matter.
• It is to be noted that if the seller has knowledge about the destruction of goods, even
then the enters into the contract of sale with buyer, then seller is bound to
compensate to the buyer.
Example:
A contracted to sell one wagon containing 700 bags of groundnut to B. Unknown to A,
109 bags had been stolen at the time of sale, Therefore, A made a delivery of 591 bags.
Held, the sale was void.
92
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
If goods perish after the “Agreement to sell; but before’ Sale [Sec. 8]
The contract is void if subsequently the goods have perished, and there is no fault on the
part of the buyer or seller in perishing the goods.
Example:
A horse was delivered upon trial for 8 days. However, the horse died within 8 days,
without the fault of buyer or seller. Held, the seller must bear the loss, as the contract
was void.
Therefore, if unascertained goods are destroyed either before or after making the
agreement, the contract shall not become void. Thus, in an agreement to sell
unascertained goods, even if the entire stock of goods is destroyed, the contract that not
become void and the seller will have to perform his promise.
Example
‘A’ agreed to sell to ‘B’ 100 bags of wheat from his stock of 1,000 bags in his go down.
The entire stock was destroyed by fire. ‘A’ is bound to deliver 100 bags of wheat or else
he will be liable for damages.
93
⇒ Generally, at the time of sale, the seller makes some representation, statements of
stipulations for the praise of his goods. Some of representations are in nature of opinion
others are in nature of facts. Representation as to fact which becomes a part of contract
of sale is called as stipulation.
⇒ Stipulation which is collateral to the main purpose of the contract is warranty. Breach
of warranty gives rise to the aggrieved party right to claim damages but contract cannot
be terminated.
⇒ Express conditions and warranties are those, which the parties agree expressly, i.e. orally
or in writing.
⇒ Implied conditions are those, which are implied by the law in the absence of any
agreement to the contrary.
IMPLIED CONDITIONS
The following are the implied conditions which are contained in the Sales of Goods Act:
⇒ If the title of seller out to be defective, the buyer must return the goods to the true owner
and recover the price from the seller.
⇒ Where the goods are sold by description, there is an implied condition that the goods
shall correspond to the description.
Example;
94
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
A machine was sold. The buyer has not been the machine, but the seller described it as a
new one. However, it was found to be a very old one. Held, the machine was not
according to the description.
⇒ Where the goods are sold by sample, the following are implied conditions.
• The bulk shall correspond to sample in quality.
• The buyer shall be given a reasonable opportunity to compare the goods with the
sample.
• The goods shall be free from any defect, rendering them un – merchantable. It is to
be noted that this implied condition applies only in the case of latent defects, i.e.
those defects which cannot be discovered by ordinary inspection. In fact, such
defects are discovered when the goods are put to use or by examination in
laboratories. The seller is not liable for apparent or visible defects which can be
discovered by examination.
⇒ If the sale is by sample as well as description, both conditions shall be satisfied. Goods
must correspond with sample as well as description.
Example :
A agreed to sell to C some oil described as “Foreign refined oil” and warranted only
equal to sample. The goods supplied were equal to sample, but contained a mixture to
hemp oil. Held, C could reject the goods.
⇒ Where the buyer, expressly or impliedly, tells the seller the particular purpose for which
he needs the goods and relies on the skill or judgment of the seller, there is an implied
condition that the goods shall be reasonably fit for such purpose.
⇒ When the article can be used only for one particular purpose, the buyer need not inform
the seller the purpose for which the goods are required.
Example:
A purchased a hot water bottle from a chemist. While the bottle was being used by A’s
wife, it burst and injured A’s wife. Held, the seller was liable for damages as the bottle
was not fit for the purpose for which it was meant – Priest vs Last.
⇒ The condition as to quality or fitness’ well not apply, if the buyer is suffering from an
abnormality, which renders the goods unsuitable for a particular purpose and the buyer
does not inform the seller about that abnormally.
Example
95
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
A purchased a coat. He had abnormally sensitive skin, By wearing the coat, he got skin
complaint. Held, there was no breach of condition, as he had not disclosed the
abnormally of his skin.
⇒ Where the goods can be used for a number of purposes, the buyer should inform the
particular purpose for which such goods were required. If the does not disclose, there is
no such conditions of quality or fitness.
Conditions as to merchantability
⇒ Where goods are bought by description from a seller, who deals in goods of that
description, there is an implied conditions that the goods shall be of merchantable
quality.
⇒ ‘Merchantability’ means that there is no defect in the goods, which renders them unfit for
sale. Thus, a watch that will not keep time and a pen that will not write cannot be
regarded as merchantable.
Example:
A radio set was sold to a layman. The set was defective. It did not work in spite of
repairs, Held, the buyer could return the set and claim refund.
Condition as to wholesomeness
⇒ In the case of eatable and food – stuff, there is an implied condition that the goods shall
be wholesomeness, i.e., free from any defect which renders them unfit for human
consumption.
Example:
A Purchased milk from B, a milk dealer. The milk contained typhoid germs. A’s wife on
taking the milk got infected and died. Held, A was entitled to get damages – Frost vs
Aylesbury Dairy Co. Ltd.
IMPLIED WARRANTIES
The following are the implied warranties which are contained in the Sales of Goods Act:
⇒ In the absence to any contract showing contrary intention, there is an implied warranty
that the buyer shall have and enjoy quiet possession of the goods. If the buyer is
disturbed in the enjoyment of the goods, he can claim damages from the seller.
⇒ Unless the circumstances of the case are such as to show a contrary intension, there is an
implied warranty that the goods shall be free from any charge or encumbrance in
96
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
favour of any party not declared to the buyer before or at the time contract is made.
However, there will not be any such warranty if charge is declared to buyer at the time of
sale.
⇒ In case of sale of dangerous goods, the seller is under an obligations to warn the buyer
about the probable danger. Failure to do so will make the seller liable to pay damages.
Example :
A sold a tin of disinfectant to B, knowing that it was likely to be dangerous to the tin,
whereupon disinfectant powder went into her eyes, causing her injury. Held, A was
liable in damages to B, as he failed to warn B of the probable danger.
⇒ It means that the buyer while purchasing goods must act with a “third eye and ear”,
i.e.,
• He should be careful to see that the goods purchased will serve his purpose well.
• If the buyer is not careful and he finds later on that the goods do not serve his
purpose, he cannot hold the seller liable for it.
• The seller is under no obligation to tell the defects of his articles.
97
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
• Implied conditions as to quality or fitness. It means when buyer has specified his
purpose and relied on skill of seller, the doctrine of caveat emptor is not applicable.
• When the consent of buyer is obtained by fraud, the provision of doctrine of caveat
emptor is not applicable.
98
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP
⇒ Ownership is transferred immediately at the time of making the contract if all the
following conditions are satisfied:
Example :
A sold to B, 100 bales of cotton lying in his godown. Before the bales could be identified
and separated, all bales were destroyed in fire. Here, seller is liable for damage because
ownership is not transferred.
Section 21
⇒ If the goods are not ready in deliverable state at the time of making contract of sale,
ownership of goods is transferred after formation of contract of sale when following
conditions are satisfied;
• Contract is for specific goods.
• Goods are put in deliverable state by seller.
• Fact that the goods are put into deliverable state has come to knowledge to the
buyer.
Example :
Certain quantity of oil was purchased by A. The oil was to be filled in tins. B filled up
some of the tins and informed A to take the delivery. In the meantime, a fire destroyed
99
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
the entire quantity of oil. Held, A will bear the loss of the oil which was filed in the tins
and the seller must bear the loss of the balances.
Section 22
⇒ If the goods are not weight or measured at the time of making contract of sale, ownership
of goods is transferred after the formation of contract of sale when the following
conditions are satisfied.
• Contract is for specific goods
• At the time of formation, price is not determined. It is determined later by weighed
or measurement.
• Goods are put in deliverable state by the seller.
• Fact that the goods have been weighed or measured in order to determine price has
come to knowledge of buyer.
Example
A sold 10 kg wheat. The wheat was to be weighed. Before the wheat was weighed,
it was carried away by the flood. Held, the ownership of the wheat left with the
seller and it did not pass to the buyer.
⇒ In the case of unascertained goods, when both parties come to know which particular
goods shall be delivered, ownership is transferred.
Appropriation :
For property to pass u/s 23, the following conditions must be satisfied –
(a) Goods of the description mentioned in the contract must be produced or obtained.
(b) The must be in a deliverable state, i.e. the Goods are in such state that the Buyer would,
under the contract, be bound to take delivery of them.
(d) The assent of the parties may be given expressly or impliedly and can be given either
before or after the appropriation.
(e) Example: A having a quantity of sugar in bulk, more than sufficient to fill 20 bags,
contracts to sell to B 20 bags of it. After the contract A fills 20 bags with the sugar, given
notice to B that the bags are ready and requires him to take them away. B says he will
100
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
take them as soon as he can. By this appropriation by A, and assent by B, property in the
sugar passes to B.
Example :
20 bags of sugar out of a bulk were agreed to be sold. 4 bags of sugar were filled up and
taken away by the buyer. Subsequently, the seller filled up 16 bags and informed the
buyer. The buyer replied that he will take delivery as soon as possible. However, before
the buyer could take their delivery. Goods were lost. Held, the buyer was responsible as
the ownership had passed to the buyer.
⇒ It means buyer has the option either to return goods. Here, property in goods doesn’t pass
from seller to buyer:
Example
Certain jewellery was delivered to a buyer on sale or return basis. The buyer pledged the
jewellery. Held, the buyer had adopted the transaction and as such property had passed and the
seller could not recover the jewellery from the Pawnee.
⇒ Where the railway receipt or the bill of landing is in the name of the buyer, but is sent
through the bank with the instructions that the same is to be delivered against the
acceptance of the bill or payment of the price, the property in the goods shall not pass.
By making the Goods deliverable to the order of the By Seller drawing a bill for the price
Seller or his agent. and making it acceptable by the
Buyer.
101
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
⇒ The general rule is that risk passes with ownership. We can say that risk and ownership
and ownership to together. However, express agreement between parties may provide
otherwise.
⇒ When delivery is delayed because of fault of any party, he is liable for risk.
⇒ Where the delivery of goods has been delayed due to the fault of buyer/seller, goods are
at the risk of the party in fault.
⇒ The general rule is expressed by maxim ‘Namodat quod non habet’ which means no one
can give what he does not himself posses. If seller’s title is defective, then buyer’s title will
be defective.
⇒ Alternatively, we can say that the seller can’t give a better title to the buyer than be himself
has.
Where the owner by his conduct or by his act leads the buyer to believe that the seller has
the authority to sell and induces the buyer to buy the goods, he shall be estopped from
denying the fact that seller had no right to sell the goods.
Example : (Refer Classroom Notes Hira Sweets)
Example
A entrusted his car to a mercantile agent to receive offers and not to sell. A also delivered
signed documents to the agent. On the basis of these documents, the agent pretended to the
buyer that he had authority to sell the car and thus, the car was sold. Held, the owner was
estopped from denying buyers title.
102
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
A mercantile agent means an agent having in the customary course of business as such
agent authority either to sell goods, or to consign goods for the purpose of sale, or to buy
goods, or to raise money on the security of goods [Section 2(9)].
Example
A and B Jointly purchased a car. The car was in the possession of A with the consent of B.
Later on A sold the car to an innocent purchaser. The purchaser will get a good title.
Example
A purchased a watch from B under fraud. A sold the watch to C, who bought it in good
faith. C gets goods title.
Example
A sells certain goods to B and promises to deliver the goods the next day. Before the
delivery, A sells and delivers the goods to C, who buys them in good faith and without
notice of the prior sale to B, C gets a good title to the goods, not with standing that the
property had, before he purchased, passed to B.
103
2. Duty of Seller Sec. 31: It is the duty of the Seller to deliver the goods and of the buyer to
accept and pay for them in accordance with the contract of Sale.
(a) doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery ; or
(b) which has the effect of putting the Goods in the possession of the Buyer or of any
person authorized to hold them on his behalf.
TYPES OF DELIVERY
It is a delivery where When goods are not Where the third party who
goods are handed physically delivered to the is in possession of goods,
over to the buyer or buyer but some symbol of acknowledge to hold
his authorized agent. the real possession or goods on behalf of the
It means goods are control over goods is buyer is known as
physically put in handed over to buyer. construction delivery.
possession of the
buyer. Example Example:
Delivery of key of the car. A sells 100 bags of
cement lying in B’s
godown. B agrees to hold
the 100 bags of cement on
behalf of A.
Forward Delivery
Where delivery is to be made in future, and not at the time contract is entered into.
⇒ General rule suggest that the delivery of goods and payment of price are concurrent
conditions. However, parties may provide otherwise.
104
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
o A delivery of part of goods with an intention of giving the delivery of the whole amounts
to the delivery of the whole for the purpose of transfer of ownership of goods but a
delivery of part of goods with an intention of separating it from the whole lot does not
amount to the delivery of the whole of the goods.
⇒ It is seller’s duty to be ready and willing to deliver the goods to the buyer. But he is not
bound to deliver goods unless the buyer makes a demand for delivery of the goods.
⇒ If the buyer fails to demand the delivery of goods, the seller is not liable for breach;
Buyer must demand delivery within a reasonable time. However, contract may provide
otherwise.
Place of delivery:
In case of sale
In case of agreement of sell
(i) In respect of existing goods At the place at which goods are at the time of
agreement of sell.
(ii) In respect of future goods At the place at which goods are manufacture,
produce or acquire
Time of Delivery
⇒ If the contract specified time of delivery, goods shall be delivered within such time.
⇒ If no time is specified in contract as to time of delivery of goods, it should be delivered
within reasonable time.
Unless and until such third person acknowledge to the buyer that the holds the goods on his
behalf
However this provision shall not affect the operation of the issue or transfer of any documents of
the title of the goods.
105
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
Demand or tender of delivery may be treat is reasonable unless made at reasonable hour. That is
reasonable hour is a question affects.
Expenses of delivery
⇒ If the seller has delivered excess quantity, the buyer has the following options:
• To accept the whole of the goods delivered to him.
• To reject the whole of the goods delivered of him.
• To accept contracted quantity and reject the excess.
⇒ Right to reject the goods in excess of the contract does not apply where the variation is
negligible.
⇒ Further, the right to reject the goods is not similar to the right to cancel the contract. If
the buyer rejects the goods (either because they are less than or in excess of the quantity
contracted for), the seller has a right to tender again the contract quantity and the buyer is
bound to accept the same.
⇒ Delivery by installment is not valid except when the contract provides so or buyer accepts
the delivery in installment.
106
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
Where the seller agrees to deliver the Goods at his own risk at a place other than at which they
are sold, the Buyer shall bear the risk of deterioration necessarily incident to the course of
transit, unless otherwise agreed.
⇒ Delivery doesn’t mean acceptance of goods, Buyer has deemed to have accepted the goods
under the following circumstances:
• When he intimates the seller about acceptance of goods.
• After receipt of goods, he does some act of affirmation.
• When he doesn’t inform seller about rejection of goods within a reasonable time.
He is required to intimate the seller about rejection. (Buyer’s not bound to return the rejected
goods)
⇒ If the buyer wrongfully refuses to take delivery of goods, he is liable for damages and
expenses like storage cost and transportation cost to the seller.
107
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
UNPAID SELLER
Section 45
A seller of goods is deemed to be unpaid in the following cases:
• The price must be due but not paid. (When the whole of the price has not been paid
or tendered)
• A negotiable instrument, like cheque, bill of exchange etc., was received, but the
same has been dishonored.
• Seller who has obtained a decree for the price of the goods will also be an unpaid
seller, if the decree has not been satisfied.
• When the seller has been paid the large amount but small portion of payment remains
to be paid.
Unpaid seller has the right against goods as well as against the buyer:
⇒ Rights of unpaid seller against the goods:
Right of Lien
⇒ It means the right to retain the possession of goods until full price is received.
⇒ Seller can exercise his right of lien on the following two conditions:
108
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
Part delivery of goods does not disentitle the unpaid seller from exist lien on the remainder
goods.
Conditions : unpaid Seller + possession of goods with carrier (independent) + insolvent buyer
109
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
⇒ If the goods are rejected by the buyer and the goods are in the possession of the carrier, the
transit is not at an end, even if the seller has refused to take them back.
The unpaid seller’s right of lien or stoppage in transit is not affected by any further sale or other
disposition of goods by the buyer.
Exception
o When seller has given his assent to such mortgage or other disposition of goods made by
the buyer.
o When a document of title has been transferred to the buyer and the buyer transfer the
document to a person who has brought the goods in good faith for value.
⇒ In case of perishable goods, unpaid seller can resale the goods if following conditions
satisfied.
• Buyer fails to pay the price within reasonable time.
• Seller is not required to give notice of re – sale.
⇒ In case of other goods (not perishable) unpaid, the seller can resale goods if the following
conditions are satisfied:
110
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
Rights of
buyer/Buyers
remedies
against seller
Delivery to Carrier
⇒ It means transporter or bailee to whom goods are delivered by the seller for
transportation to buyer.
⇒ When goods are delivered to a carrier, it is deemed delivery of goods to the buyer if
following conditions are satisfied:
• Seller delivers exactly same goods as per contract.
• The Buyer has informed carrier name, address and goods required to be delivered.
• The seller delivers goods for the purpose of delivery.
⇒ It means public sale. The seller invites the interested parties by advertisement to offer the
price. (i.e. bid)
112
https://t.me/LawCollegeNotes_Stuffs
⇒ Advertisement of auction sale is not offer but an invitation to make an offer and therefore
if an auction sale is not held on appointed day, bidder can’t sue auctioneer.
⇒ Every bid amounts as offer and acceptance is given by auctioneer by some usual mode of
acceptance e.g., fall of hammer, going – going gone or one – two – three.
⇒ Auction sale starts with placing of bids. Auctioneer accepts the highest bids but he may
accept lower bid without giving any reason. When bid accepted, valid contract is formed.
⇒ Bid once made can be withdrawn before fall of hammer even if expressly prohibit.
⇒ Seller can bid at auction sale if bidders are informed of fact. (pretended bidding)
⇒ If the seller makes use of pretended bidding to raise the price, the sale is voidable at the
option of the buyer. The bid is said to be pretended when it is made by the seller or some
one on his behalf.
⇒ Auctioneer may set reserve price or upset price. Bid lower that which is invalid.
⇒ ‘In the case of Knockout agreement, the buyers joint their hands to eliminate competition
among themselves at an raise the bid against each other and only one of them will bid at
the auction. When the profit. Prima facie, a knockout agreement is not illegal. However, if
the intention of the parties to the agreement is to defraud a third party, this will be illegal.
Sale in lots :
When the goods are put up for sale in lots, each lot is deemed, prima facie, to be the
subject – matter of a separate contract of sale.
⇒ FOB Contract
• It means free on board. Here, seller is required to put the goods on board of ship at
his expense.
• Buyer is liable for all the expenses and risk one goods are loaded on ship.
• The ownership of goods is transferred to the buyer as soon as goods are loaded to
ship.
⇒ Ex – Ship Contract
• It means contract in which the seller has to deliver the goods to the buyer at the port
of destination.
• All the freight charges and risk during voyage for goods remain with seller.
• Ownership of the goods is transferred to the buyer when goods are actually delivered
at the port of destination.
114