Lipid Profile in Anemia
Lipid Profile in Anemia
Lipid Profile in Anemia
Dissertation Submitted To
BRANCH - I
APRIL - 2017
CERTIFICATE
Post Graduate Course from 2014 – 2017 . This is submitted as partial fulfillment for
in April 2017
Dr.C.Ganesan,M.D., Dr.S.Gopalakrishnan,M.D.,
Professor and Head of Department, Unit Chief,
Department of General Medicine, Department of General Medicine,
Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur Medical College,
Thanjavur. Thanjavur.
The Dean
Thanjavur Medical College,
Thanjavur.
CERTIFICATE BY THE GUIDE
supervision and guidance. All the observations and conclusions have been made
Medical College Hospital during Jan 2016 – June 2016 under the guidance and
Internal Medicine.
Professor and Head of the Department of Medicine, Prof. C. GANESAN. M.D., for
allotting me this topic and for his constant encouragement in this venture.
I am grateful to all the patients and volunteers who participated in this study. I
2,3-BPG 2,3-biphosphoglycerate
Apo Apolipoprotein
CoA Coenzyme A
DM Dimorphic anaemia
FH Familial hypercholesterolemia
Hb Haemoglobin
LP(a) Lipoprotein a
SD Standard deviation
T3 3,5,3’-Triiodothyronine
T4 Thyroxine
PAGE
NUMBER CHAPTER
NUMBER
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 OBJECTIVES 2
3 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 3
5 RESULTS 65
6 DISCUSSION 90
7 SUMMARY 96
8 CONCLUSION 97
9 BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANNEXURE
1.PROFORMA
10 2. CONSENT FORM
3. INFORMATION SHEET
4. MASTER CHART
INTRODUCTION
effect of serum lipids on heart disease and vascular disease. Elevated serum lipids
have a significant correlation with the risk of atherosclerosis which in turn causes
coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease & peripheral vascular disease, thus
There are studies reporting the beneficial effect of anaemia on lipid profile. Type
of anaemia does not influence the lowering of lipid levels. Decreased serum
family, instead it is observed that there occurs a proportionate decrease in all major
lipoprotein families. Its interesting that this fall in serum lipids in anaemic patients
may decrease the risk of coronary artery disease – a disease which kills number of
The mechanism by which anaemia causes a fall in serum lipid level is still a
cholesterol synthesis, increased levels GM – CSM & finally – in the bone marrow
profile is normalized.
1
OBJECTIVES
• To study Lipid profile of anaemic patients as compared with age & sex
matched controls.
subfractions.
2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Milestones in History
Lipaemia.
first reported by Neisser, Derlin & Jonel. Conclusively, Klemperer & Umber
showed phospholipids, cholesterol and other sterols are frequently elevated in those
major causes of high serum lipids which in turn causes increased risk of
Griguart put forward the theory of two types of Lipaemia : Masked and visible.
3
The technique of preparative ultracentrifugation for isolation of
Lipoproteins was introduced by Havel, Eder & Bragdon. With the exception of
improved the technique. The credit goes to Lees & Hatch for this contribution.
Later, in the year 1967, Ritkind & Gale first showed the association of
proportional fall in the level of all major Lipoprotein subfractions rather than
mg/dl in the cholesterol levels between women with Haemoglobin levels above and
4
Lipid – Biochemistry, Metabolism
combination with albumin in plasma. Lipids are major energy source, and lipids in
the forms of fat soluble vitamins have regulatory or coenzyme functions and as
prostaglandins & steroid hormones – they have control over body’s homeostasis.
Classification of Lipids
lipids.
Simple Lipids
These are esters of fatty acids with alcohol. Fatty acids are classified based
on the number and position of double bonds. Saturated fatty acids have no double
bonds. Monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids have one and more double
bonds respectively. Fatty acids are a major source of energy. Triglycerides are
esters of fatty acids with glycerol. Waxes are esters of fatty acids other than
glycerol.
Complex lipids
5
Derived Lipids
There are derived by hydrolysis of simple & complex lipids and they bear
the characteristic features of Lipids . Glycerol, fatty acids, fat soluble vitamins etc.,
Other Lipids
Functions of Lipids
Lipids are dutiful within limits. But when consumed in excess, they
source. Phospholipids and cholesterol make the cell membrane structure and
surrounding the vital organs-gives them protection, provide insulation to our body
6
CHOLESTEROL
distributed animal sterol. It was first isolated from bile. Cholesterol is synthesized
in the body which is the major source and it is also absorbed from the diet. Liver,
cover and helps in transmission of electrical impulses within the nervous system.
converts this into mevalonic acid which in turn, through a number of steps, is
which is controlled by the amount of cholesterol inside cells. Cholesterol does not
bile acids and secreted into the gut. Both free cholesterol and bile acids undergo
enterohepatic circulation.
Synthesis of Bile acids takes place in Liver. This enzyme is under the negative
7
LDL Receptor
regulates the uptake of cholesterol rich Lipoproteins from the circulation. LDL
receptor binds apolipoproteins B-100 and E. The cholesterol content inside cell
regulates the number of LDL receptors and thus keeps intracellular cholesterol
cholesterol that enters the cell. The enzyme cholesterol ester hydrolase generates
free cholesterol again by hydrolysis for efflux from the cells or to use as substrate
for biosynthesis.
Ebners glands on the dorsum of tongue secrete lingual lipase which is not
of much significance, thus beginning the digestion of lipids in the oral cavity itself.
into water soluble short chain and Medium chain fatty acids which enter the portal
vein.
The major part of digestion of dietary lipids takes place in the Intestine by
activated lipase and phospholipase A2. Bile salts helps in the digestion of lipids
8
Pancreatic lipase hydrolyses triacyl glycerols into mono-acyl glycerol,
diacyl glycerol and fatty acids. Bile salt activated lipase hydrolyses cholesterol
ABSORPTION OF LIPIDS
Hydrophilic products Such as Glycerol and SCFA formed after the digestion of
hydrophobic. Micelles are spherical with a hydrophobic core which contains the
Intestinal lumen to the cells in the brush border of intestine from where they are
Once inside the mucosal cells, fatty acids are again re-esterified into
9
Intestinal mucosa produces chyle loaded with chylomicrons which is
transported into thoracic duct via lacteals and finally into the systemic circulation.
chylomicrons & VLDL and releases free fatty acids. Insulin the main fat storage
hormone – converts free fatty acids into triglycerides for storage in the adipose
Hormone sensitive lipase causes lipolysis and release of free fatty acids into
the blood stream. There are number of hormones that activate lipoprotein lipase
Those that inhibit hormone-sensitive lipase and thereby lipolysis include Insulin,
FFA circulate in plasma as albumin bound forms and are either taken up by liver or
liver or kidney.
Except for long chain fatty acids which are oxidized in peroxisomes, all
other fatty acid oxidation and ketogenesis takes place in the mitochondria. Fatty
acids by oxidation are converted into CoA derivatives which is further converted
into Acetyl CoA, FADH and NADH by beta oxidation. FADH and NADH enter
the electron transport system and Acetyl CoA into the citric acid cycle.
10
In uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus and in prolonged starvation, the influx of
free fatty acids into liver in large quantities exceeds liver’s capacity to metabolize
and accumulation of Acetyl CoA, FADH and NADH inside Mitochondria finally
results in ketogenesis.
in the cellular cytoplasm. 8 Acetyl CoA molecules condenses and forms palmitic
acid. LCFA such as stearic acid and Oleic acid are synthesized by chain extension
Apolipoproteins
apolipoprotein composition.
Apolipoprotein B
There are two forms – ApoB48 and ApoB-100. Liver produce apo B100
and it’s a structural component of VLDL, LDL, IDL. Its a ligand for LDL Receptor.
Apolipoprotein E
HDL1 and also serves as a ligand for LDL receptor and apo E receptor. This is
11
involves chylomicron and VLDL transport and also gets involved in the
Apolipoprotein AI
molecules.
Apolipoprotein AII
Lp AI/AII particles and is synthesized mainly in liver. This may activate hepatic
These are synthesized primarily in the liver and are readily exchanged
which are then transferred to Triglyceride rich Lipo-proteins. Apo CI and CIII
modulates remnant binding to receptors. Apo CI activates LCAT and Apo CII acts
12
LIPOPROTEIN RECEPTORS
LDL Receptor
Cholesterol content inside the cell regulates the expression of LDL receptors on cell
surface.
This is an integral receptor of cell membrane. It has high affinity for apo E
enriched chylomicron remnants and VLDL remnants but does not bind with LDL.
VLDL Receptors
are found especially in muscle, brain and fat . It is not present in liver. It delivers to
Apolipoprotein E Receptor
Scavenger Receptors
with broad range of different kinds of ligands involved in various processes like
atherosclerosis, CNS disorders and host defense mechanisms. They are classified
13
VARIOUS ENZYMES AND TRANSFER PROTEINS
Hepatic Lipase
endothelium and HSPG in the space of Disse. From the liver, this enzyme is
and triglycerides. It also binds with Heparan sulfate and causes interaction between
into Hepatocytes. IDL is processed into LDL by hepatic Lipase. Triglycerides and
phospholipids are removed from HDL2 by hepatic lipase and thus HDL2 is
converted to HDL3.
Lipoprotein lipase
Lipase then interacts with chylomicrons and VLDL in the circulation and helps in
Triglyceride hydrolysis.
LCAT
cholesterol in its free form. Small HDL particle is the major substrate for this
14
CETP
PLASMA LIPOPROTEINS
Chylomicrons
chylomicron. They are abundant in plasma after food. They contain apo B48,
apoA1, apoAIV, apoC and apoE apolipoproteins. The specific Lipoprotein is apo
release of FFA from Triglycerides, which are cleared by liver from the circulation
15
VLDL
apolipoprotein is apo B100. They also have apo E & C apolipoproteins. They are
from HDL.
IDLS retain apoE and apo B-100. Again the above two enzymes convert IDL to
IDL
The specific apolipoproteins are apoE and apo B100. They are catabolic
products of VLDL metabolism and are the precursors of LDL. IDL is finally
LDL
composition of 75% Lipid and 25% protein. The specific protein is Apo B100 and
16
VLDL are finally processed into LDL by the process of Lipase hydrolysis.
The larger VLDL particles have a core rich in triglycerides which is removed and
then the excess surface constituents after remodeling are transferred to HDL
forming LDL rich in cholesterol and devoid of all Lipoproteins, the only exception
being apoB100.
LDL receptor and apoB100 mediates most of the uptake of LDL & almost
LDL is the source of cholesterol for many cells. Cholesterol is used for
into bile acids, for production of steroid hormone in gonads & adrenal glands.
HDL
HDL1, HDL2 and HDL3. HDL is composed of 50% Lipids and 50% protein.
The major aproproteins are apoA1, Apo AII and lesser amounts of C & E. HDL1
17
The HDL precursor particles are known to excellently uptake free
cholesterol. LCAT esterifies free cholesterol and moves inside from the surface
resulting in cholesterol ester rich core (HDL-2). As more and more cholesterol is
HDL1.
receive the cholesterol from cells and transport it to other cells including
hepatocytes that are in need of cholesterol. Apo E on HDL1 makes this a target to
cells expressing LDL receptor. CETP transfers cholesterol ester to VLDL, LDL,
IDL remnants from HDL2. Thus HDL2 particles are depleted of cholesterol esters
HDL2 is then acted upon by hepatic lipase and gets converted to HDL3. Thus
HDL2-HDL3 cycle goes on perpetuating. It is a well known fact that high levels of
HDL is associated with decreased incidence of CHD. How this occurs is HDL
18
LIPIDS AND ATHEROSCLEROSIS
oxygen and nutrients to the affected organs. When oxygen is insufficient, it results
claudication of lower limbs. CHD is more important because it ranks first as the
cholesterol is an important risk factor. The other significant risk factors include
male sex, Comorbidities like Diabetes, hypertension, obesity as well as life style
factors like lack of exercise, stress and smoking also contribute to atherosclerosis.
2. High fat diet with saturated fat and cholesterol results in elevated
plasma cholesterol
19
Evidence from Human Study
by several studies. This clearly implies that reduction in plasma cholesterol levels
Epidemiological evidence
evidenced from many epidemiological studies. The MRFIT trial showed that when
cholesterol levels are greater than 200 mg/dl, the risk increased several fold.
Similarly, the seven countries study showed association between increased plasma
diet tends to increase plasma cholesterol levels. Restriction of dietary fat may have
LP (a) has apo (A) which is atherogenic due to thrombosis related mechanisms.
LDL is of different densities. The large fluffy LDLs are safe while the small
20
The LDL paradox
The LDL receptor pathway is highly regulated that only less amount of
receptors expression and thus cells are protected from accumulation of LDL. As
only limited quantities are taken up by macrophages, the question arises why LDLs
are not related to LDL receptor. The chemical modification of LDL previously
21
ATHEROGENESIS
arteries are transformed to lesioned unhealthy arteries due to oxidation and other
injury is the cause for this. After adherence these monocytes migrate between the
cells of endothelium and finally enter into the subendothelial space and are
converted into macrophages. The trapped LDL in the vessel wall undergoes
IF, IL-1, TNE, TGF B. All these factors enhance smooth muscle proliferation.
Cytokines of atherogenesis include IL-1, TFN, TNF, IL2 & CSF. These cytokines
The first macroscopic lesion visible is Fatty streak due to foam cells. Based
on local stimuli in the arterial wall fatty streaks come and go.
22
Fatty streak matures to form fibrous plaque. This extends into vessel
lumen. The already accumulated lipid is cytotoxic causing necrosis of foam cells
plaque fissuring occur and blood dissects into the artery wall resulting in the
lipids.
23
HYPERLIPIDEMIA
mg/dl is desirable, 200-240 mg/dl is borderline, greater than 240 mg/dl is high.
PRIMARY DISORDERS
Familial Hypercholesterolemia
and total cholesterol levels. The clinical picture is presence of Tendon xanthomas
celluar receptors. The mainstay of treatment is a low fat diet along with drug
therapy.
24
Familial defective apolipoprotein B-100
LDL and total cholesterol levels. Lipid profile reveals isolated increase in LDL-C
and other clinical picture of FH. Treatment is low fat, low cholesterol diet with
drug therapy.
Here plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels are elevated with increased
members is important.
feature.
25
A careful search should be done to identity the cause of obesity and treat it. The
saturated fat and restricting calories to promote weight loss must be practiced. Only
when treatment of underlying co-morbid illnesses and dietary therapy do not yield
hypertriglyceridemia .
Dietary therapy with fat free diet is adviced till the triglyceride levels are
within safety limits. This fat restriction should be continued lifelong. Medium
26
Apolipoprotein C II deficiency
syndrome involving pancreatitis and recurrent abdominal pain. After 12 hours fast,
the serum is lipaemic. Heterozygotes have mildly elevated triglyceride levels, but
Familial Hypertriglyceridemia
defect, Insulin resistance and obesity is common. Dietary restriction of fat along
covalently bonded to apo-B is the feature of this disorder. There are no special
Polygenic Hypercholesterolemia
27
Sporadic Hypercholesterolemia
distinguishing this from familial syndromes. Dietary restriction of fat along with
METABOLISM
Apolipoprotein a mutation
CETP deficiency
Familial Hypobetalipoproteinemia
Abetalipoproteinemia
SECONDARY DISORDERS
Diabetes Mellitus
Hypothyroidism
Alcohol intake
Protease inhibitors
Nephritic syndrome
28
Other agents
29
ANAEMIA
Anemia is defined as a reduction below normal limits of total red cell mass. As
Recommendation.
Prevalence
women of 15 – 44 years of age. It again increases in the elderly. Mainly, the cause
60% children
Pathology
difference is reduced.
30
The compensatory mechanism include
causes the oxygen dissociation curve to the right, thus enhancing the tissue
7-8 g/dl, there will be increased stroke volume and cardiac output increases.
Clinical Manifestation
Collapse pallor
Hypotension palpitation
Claudication
Night cramps
Cardiac murmurs
31
Cardiomegaly
Features of CCF
Neuromuscular features
Muscle cramps
GI symptoms
Genitourinary
Loss of libido
Classification
Morphology
Underlying mechanism
1. Morphology
2. Normocytic – normochromic
arthritis
32
Renal failure
Hypothyroidism
Hypopituitarism
Aplastic anemia
Red-cell hypoplasia
Myelodysplasia
Chemotherapy
Folate deficiency
Hemolysis
Myelosclerosis
Leukemia
Metastatic carcinoma
33
2. Underlying Mechanism
Intrinsic
Elliptocytosis
b) Enzyme deficiencies
synthetase deficiency
c) Hb synthesis – disorders
Β – thalassemia
Haemoglobin D,
Unstable Haemoglobins
Acquired :
34
Extrinsic abnormalities
a) Antibody mediated :
Erythroblastosis fetalis
Drug – associated
SLE
Malignant neoplasm
mycoplasma infection
b) Mechanical Trauma
c) Infection : Malaria
Aplastic anemia
35
b) Disturbed proliferation and maturation of erythroblasts :
Folate deficiency
Unknown :
Sideroblastic anemia
36
PRINCIPLES IN ANEMIA MANAGEMENT
cases of Iron – deficiency anemia further more investigations for blood loss are
required. Iron therapy may be started if there is clear cut history about the cause
without further investigation and Haemoglobin levels monitored before and after
therapy. If the Haemoglobin level increases by 1 g/dl per week, then there is full
response to therapy.
to attain safe level and then Haemoglobin has to be increased with appropriate
should be transfused along with furosemide for fear of fluid overload. In patients
with more severe CCF, through one, arm packed cells are transfused and through
37
ANEMIA OF BLOOD LOSS
compensatory mechanism of shift of water from interstitial fluid to restore the lost
blood volume. This causes the hematocrit to fall, Erythropoietin levels are
can be reused but, if there is external bleeding, iron deficiency occurs in presence
If the rate of loss exceeds the regenerative capacity of RBC precursors, then
anemia is manifested. Iron deficiency anemia is the most common type in chronic
blood loss.
38
HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA
then RBCs get sequestered within the spleen. This causes extravascular hemolysis.
be decreased haptoglobins.
Due to high levels of bilirubin, pigment gallstones are formed. In chronic cases,
39
Hereditary spherocytosis
namely ankyrin, spectrin and protein 3. This causes loss of membrane stability
which results in decreased surface to volume ratio and a spherical shape due to
diagnosis is done on the basis of family history, hematological findings and raised
most patients.
Hereditary elliptocytosis
40
G-6-PD deficiency
G6PD plays a main role in HMP shunt, which is responsible for protecting
agents and favism due to a bean, severe hemolysis and anemia occur. Within 24
abdominal pain. Within 2-3 days, anemia, jaundice, hemoglobrinuria and acute
renal failure sets in. Anisocytosis, poikilocytosis, Heinz bodies are seen in
precipitating factors and blood transfusion helps in the management of this disorder
The other features include anemia, iron deficiency, thrombosis of hepatic, portal or
cerebral veins. The rare complications include aplastic anemia, AML and
41
Autoimmune Hemolytic anemia
SLE, CLL or lymphomas. Anemia occurs very rapidly, present with angina or
Mechanical trauma
Peripheral smear shows Burr cells, helmet cells, triangle cells. Due to continuous
Hypersplenism
42
HEMOGLOBINOPATHIES
pseudoanemias
to an amino acid substitution of valine for glutamine in 6th position on the β globin
chain. HbS forms polymers that damage the RBC membrane in the deoxygenated
form, causing jaundice, pigment gall stones, splenomegaly, poorly healing ulcers as
the clinical manifestation. When hemolytic or aplastic crisis occurs, life threatening
43
nucleated RBCs, Howell-Jolly bodies and target cells. Electrophoresis reveals the
condition.
Thalassemias
mutations. It causes relative increase in HbA2 and HbF due to reduced globin
synthesis. The excess α chains precipitate and damage RBC membranes which in
turn causes hemolysis. Normally, there are four α – globin gene. Usually there are
4 genes. when 3 - functioning α-globin genes are there, individuals are silent
carriers. α –thalassemia trait occurs when there is 2 α- globin gene. When only one
is present, then it is called Hb-H disease. They may require blood transfusion
during exacerbation caused by infection or other stresses. When all 4 globin genes
are deleted, the fetus is known as hydrops fetalis which is still born. Thalassemia
44
Transfusion therapy will cause hemosiderosis and jaundice with heart
the patient is homozygous for milder form of beta – thalassemia. They have
Severe form require blood transfusion, folate supplementation with iron chelation
thalassemia.
45
ANEMIAS OF IMPAIRED RBC PRODUCTION
Aplastic anemia
Causes
Acquired
b) Chemical agents
streptomycin
e) Miscellaneous
Onset is usually gradual, but can present at any age. Symptom occurs due
46
combined with cyclosporine, Allogenic bone marrow transplantation and
Any etiology which causes chronic renal failure may have associated
defect causes chronic hemolysis due to bleeding and uremia. Iron deficiency
administration.
Megaloblastic anemia
morphological changes in blood and bone marrow. The precursors are abnormally
47
stages of RBC development. Nuclear – cytoplasmic asynchrony with giant
erythropoiesis.
Causes
b) impaired absorption
Malabrosption states
cancer
48
d) Increased Requirement – pregnancy, infancy, disseminated cancer
Pernicious anemia
neurological changes. Diagnosis depends on the decreased serum folate levels and
49
IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA
Causes
Deficient diet
Decreased absorption
Hemoglobinuria
dysphagia (esophageal webs). The findings include glossitis, brittle nails, cheilosis.
Initially there is lower serum ferritin levels and elevated serum TIBC.
poikilocytosis. In severe forms, target cells, pencil cells, nucleated RBCs are seen.
with full return to baseline after 2 months indicate good response. Iron therapy
50
Sideroblastic anemia
myelodysplasia.
marked erythroid hyperplasia and ringed sideroblasts are seen. Iron store is
increased. Pyridoxine helps along with blood transfusion and iron chelation
therapy.
arthritis), Neoplasm and alcoholism. There will be low serum iron with reduced
TIBC and abundant stored iron in mononuclear – phagocytic cells showing a defect
51
HYPOCHOLESTEROLEMIA AND ANEMIA
related to anemia.
with proportional reduction in all the major lipoprotein families. This was
cholesterol.
In 1970, a study was conducted in 4,070 women in which 124 were found
to have Haemoglobin below 10.5 g/dl. In females with Haemoglobin level >
10.5g/dl, serum cholesterol were 241 plus or minus 2.5mg/dl and in females with
Haemoglobin < 5g/dl, serum cholesterol were 211 plus or minus 3.9 mg/dl.
Haemoglobin< 10.5 g/dl received 0, 30, 90 mg/day iron daily for 12 weeks. Rise
in serum cholesterol is observed. Dilution effect is the explanation for the observed
52
volume between the groups in the study was proportionally similar to difference in
hypocholesterolemia and various types of anemia. After B12 / folic acid therapy in
in sickle cell anemia there is increase in both hematocrit and serum cholesterol.
the study, anemias associated with hypocholestrolemia regardless of the type, low
hematocrit is the cause of low cholesterol levels. This association appears due to
conducted among 45 patients with sickle cell anemia and 45 age plus sex matched
Cholesterol level is lower in patients with sickle cell anemia than in control but
expansion.
53
In contrast to the above studies Seip & Skrede considered hemodilution
only as a part of explanation for decreased cholesterol levels. The study consisted
with congenital sideroblastic anemia, 2 with iron – deficiency anemia. All patients
have low levels of cholesterol irrespective of hemolytic anemia with very active
cholesterol, LDL, HDL were reduced and it is associated with maximal Bone
This same result was drawn by El-Hazmi et al, who investigated 400
normal individuals, 100 patients with sickle –cell disease, 220 sickle heterozygotes
(HbAS ) and 100 patients with G6PD deficiency. Sickle cell patients had
significantly lower cholesterol when compared with normal people. On the other
hand there is no significant difference between HbAS and G6PD deficient groups.
The results showed that utilization or production might account for the decreased
54
In 1986 au et al suggested that due to increased shunting of substrates to
In an animal model, a study conducted which showed that cholesterol levels were
with iron deficiency anemia were directly related to the level of iron. In patients
with Haemoglobin 8g/dl, the total cholesterol level is significantly lower (148+
16mg/dl vs 170 + 17 mg/dl). Triglyceride level was 2-fold lower than in patients
a study in which 70 children suffer from iron deficiency anemia and 20 healthy
children were taken and the results showed that there is higher serum total
triglyceride and total cholesterol , VLDL levels in iron deficiency patients than in
healthy controls.
patients serum cholesterol levels decreased by 27% - 53% from baseline except
one.
receptor activity of leukemic cells. 59 patients were taken into account. The study
showed that in patients with leukemia and other neoplastic disorders due to elevated
55
LDL receptor activity, uptake and degradation of LDL occurs, thus causing
hypocholesterolemia.
cholesterol in hairy cell leukemia, 66 patients were taken into study. They were
treated with cladribine for 7 days. After therapy HDL and LDL levels rise, but
polycythemia vera and 9 with angiogenic myeloid metaplasia were taken. There
was lower values of total plasma cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and HDL. But the
removal rate of LDL was significantly increased in MPD patients which was
attributed to both non-specific, low affinity processes such as fluid endocytosis and
hypercholesterolemia. There was lower total and LDL cholesterol levels in subjects
with FH plus β (o) thalassemia trait than those with FH only but there is no
56
Pathophysiology
decreased synthesis, increased excretion, shift of plasma into other tissues or some
factors.
Gilbert and Ginsberg study showed that LDL removal from plasma occurs
only due to fluid endocytosis. High receptor mediated uptake and degradation of
LDL by leukemic cells was the reason in MPD patients. On the other hand,
showed that long-term treatment with recombrinant human erythropoietin does not
57
It may also be due to the effect of plasma dilution but the rise in cholesterol
level after treatment is not of the same relative increase as the observed rise in
body cholesterol.
Other factors also contribute to change in cholesterol level like liver disease
that change hepatic cholesterol synthesis and absorption, because cholesterol levels
do not always return to normal in patients treated with transfusion. The theory
Conclusion
and Hematocrit.
Patients with anemia may have lower risk of developing ischemic heart
disease not only due to hypocholesterolemia but also due to the theory of iron
induced free radical damage . This may explain the difference in the occurrence of
ischemic heart disease between the sexes, premenopausal and post – menopausal
regarding the incidence of coronary heart disease is not shown in any study.
58
Few studies have been designed to understand the basis of this relationship.
Further studies are needed to find relationship between anemia of various etiologies
correlated with plasma cholesterol. So this was studied only by Ginsberg &
study has to be done to determine the true effect of anemia on cholesterol after
specific treatment.
59
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Source of Data
The data for this study was collected from patients who presented to
Sample Size
50 cases, 50 controls
Study duration
Inclusion Criteria
All proven cases of anaemia. Men: Hb < 13 gm%, Women: Hb < 12 gm%.
Exclusion Criteria
60
4. Known case of Diabetes Mellitus or RBS > 200mg/dl or FBS > 126 mg/dl
6. Alcoholics
7. Smokers
13. Blood Urea > 40 mg% or Serum Creatinine > 1.4 mg%
14. SGOT > 40 U/L or SGPT > 40 U/L or Serum Alkaline Phosphatase > 250 U/L
Clinical evaluation
A detailed history was obtained from the subjects of the study, with
special emphasis on age, sex and occupation; non specific symptoms of anaemia
suggestive of a specific cause for anaemia like pica, dysphagia, abdominal pain,
bony pain, fever, loss of appetite, weight loss, jaundice, bleeding, malaena,
61
including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular
accident, AIDS, recent blood loss and gall stones. Dietary habits and habits like
steroids and NSAIDs was obtained. Family history of anaemia, jaundice and
pigmentation and knuckle pigmentation. Pulse, blood pressure, weight, height and
to look for the presence of elevated JVP, venous hum, cardiomegaly, S3 and flow
murmur. The respiratory system was examined to look for evidence of pulmonary
nervous system was examined for confusion, muscular weakness, deep tendon
Investigations
random blood sugar, blood urea, serum creatinine, liver function tests, and thyroid
stimulating hormone levels. A urine sample was obtained for urine analysis,
including albumin, sugar and microscopy. Fasting venous blood sample (> 12
62
hours) was obtained for estimation of lipid profile. T3 and T4 levels, fasting and
post prandial (two hours after an oral dose of 75gms of glucose) blood sugar
levels, and bone marrow aspiration cytology was done in selected cases based on
clinical assessment.
and peripheral smear was done manually using Leishmann’s stain by a qualified
pathologist. Urine albumin and sugar was estimated by dipstick method. Urine
were done using the fully automated Technicon RA-XT system by Bayer. TSH, T4
Estimation of total cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides was done with the
Controls
Fifty non anemic age and sex matched subjects were selected and screened
for compliance with the exclusion criteria. Complete haemogram, lipid profile and
63
Statistical Methods80,81
Student t test has been used to test the homogeneity of age between
case and control. Chi-square test has been used to find the homogeneity of sex
between case and control. Student t test has been used to find the significance
of Lipid profiles between case and controls. Analysis of Variance has been used
to find the significance of mean lipid profiles when there are more than 2 groups.
Mann Whitney U test has been carried to find the significance between case and
control for TC/HDL and LDL/HDL ratio. Kruskal Wallis test has been used to find
significance of TC/HDL and LDL/HDL ratio when there are more than 2 groups.
Effect Size due to Cohen d has been computed to find the extent of effect of
Statistical software
The statistical software used for the analysis of the data was SPSS 11.0
and Systat8.0. Microsoft Word and Excel have been used to generate figures and
tables.
64
RESULTS
Study Design
was undertaken to study the clinical presentation of anaemic cases and also to
Age
The cases and controls were matched for age. Majority of the cases were
middle aged (30-60). The youngest case was 14 years old. The oldest was 75 years
old.
Table 1
Age distribution with Haemoglobin levels in cases and controls
Case
Age in
Haemoglobin levels (in gm/dl) n=80 Control
Years
<6 6-9 >9 Total (n=50)
(n=9) (n=19) (n=22) (n= 50)
≤20 1 1 2
4 4
(11.17) (5.3) (9.1)
21-30 2 5 3
10 10
(22.2) (26.3) (13.4)
31-40 2 5 4
11 11
(22.2) (26.3) (18.2)
41-50 1 3 2
6 6
(11.1) (15.7) (9.1)
51-60 1 2 7
10 10
(11.1) (10.5) (31.8)
61-70 1 2 3
6 6
(11.1) (10.5) (13.6)
>70 1 1 1
3 3
(11.1) (2.3) (4.5)
Inference :
Samples are age matched (p>0.05) Anaemic cases <50 years of are 2.42 times more to
have Hb levels < 6 gm/dl (p=0.107) and Anamic cases >50 years of age are 4.31 times
more likely to have > 9Hb gm/dl (p<0.01)
65
Figure 1
Age distribution in cases and controls
8
6 6 6 6
6
4 4
4 3 3
0
< 20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 >70
Case Control
Figure 2
Age distribution with Haemoglobin levels
10
4
3
8
7
6
2
5 5 3
4
3
2
3
2 2 2
1 1
2 2
1 1 1 1 1
0
<21 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 >70
Hb >9 gm/dl Hb 6-9 gm/dl Hb < 6gm/dl
66
Sex
The cases and controls were matched for sex. The cases consisted of 22
males and 28 females. Sex was not associated with haemoglobin levels
Table 2
Inference
Samples are sex matched (P>0.05) sex is not statistically associated with
haemoglobin levels (P>0.05)
Figure 3
Sex distribution between case and controls
Male, Male,
44% Female 44% Female
56% 56%
Case Control
67
Distribution of cases according to type and severity of Anaemia
and 5 cases had a normocytic normochromic blood picture (NN). Out of the 4
cases grouped together as ‘others’ for the purpose of analysis, 3 cases had
megaloblastic anaemia, 2 cases had pancytopenia, and one case each had chronic
haemoglobin less than 6 gm/dl, 19 cases had haemoglobin between 6 and 9 gm/dl,
Table -3
Hb
Type of Anaemia
(in gm/dl)
DM MH NH NN Others Total
<6 7 3 - - 2 12
6-9 10 7 1 - 2 20
>9 3 2 8 5 0 18
Total 20 12 9 5 4 50
68
Symptoms
The most common presenting symptom was easy fatiguability, which was
present in 25 cases. The next common symptoms were dyspnoea (15 cases),
palpitations (16 cases) and giddiness (12 cases). Other symptoms were loss of
appetite (4 cases), fever (2 cases), weight loss (2 cases), angina(2 cases), dysphagia,
jaundice and menorrhagia (3 cases each), bony pain and bleeding (1 case) each. Not
seen in the study group were pica, abdominal pain, malaena, haemoglobinuria and
pregnancy.
Figure 4
Symptoms
30 A: Fatigue
B: Dyspnoea
25 C: Giddiness
D:Palpitations
20 E:Angina
F:Dysphagia
15 G:Body pain
H:Fever
10 I:Loss of appetite
J: weight loss
5 K:Jaundice
L:Bleeding
0 M:Menorrhagia
A B C D E F G H I J K L M
Symptoms
69
Symptoms and severity of anaemia
Cases with more severe anaemia were found to be more likely to have
symptoms. All cases with haemoglobin less than 6 gm/dl had at least one
symptom, while out of 22 cases with haemoglobin more than 9 gm/dl, only 8 cases
(36.4%) had at least one symptom. Most symptoms were found more
cases with haemoglobin more than 9 gm/dl. Fever, bony pain and bleeding were
the only symptoms which were found more frequently in cases with less severe
anaemia. Cases with severe anaemia also had more number of symptoms. Cases
with haemoglobin less than 6 gm/dl had an average of 3.7 symptoms, compared to
cases with haemoglobin more than 9 gm/dl, who had only an average of 0.6
symptoms.
palpitations, fever, loss of appetite and loss of weight were equally frequent
cases with normocytic normochromic blood picture. This is possibly due to the
fact that these cases had less severe anaemia. Symptoms like angina, dysphagia
and menorrhagia were seen only in patients with dimorphic anaemia and
microcytic hypochromic anaemia. Bony pain and bleeding was seen only in one
70
Table -4
Symptoms and severity of Anaemia
71
Past history
ischaemic heart disease or AIDS. None of the cases had a past history of
Personal history
cases out of 22) of all cases with haemoglobin more than 9 gm/ dl.
the other types of anaemia (5.6% to 22.2%). None of the cases had a history of
Drug History
Family history
Four cases had a family history of anaemia, out of whom three had
72
General physical examination
which was present in 30 cases. Also seen were glossitis (10 cases), koilonychia
ankle ulcers.
73
General physical examination and severity of anaemia
Cases with more severe anaemia were found to be more likely to have
than 6 gm/dl had at least one sign, while out of 2 2 cases with
haemoglobin more than 9 gm/dl, only 6 cases (21.6%) had at least one
sign. All signs were found more frequently in cases with more severe
anaemia. 100 % of cases with haemoglobin less than 6 gm/dl had pallor
and 66.7% had glossitis, compared to just 21.1 % and 0% in cases with
haemoglobin more than 9 gm/dl. Cases with severe anaemia also had more
less than 6 gm/dl had an average of 2.8 signs, compared to cases with
haemoglobin more than 9 gm/dl, who had only an average of 0.2 signs.
blood picture. This is possibly due to the fact that these cases had less severe
74
TABLE 6
Haemolytis facies 0 0 0 -
Ankle ulcers 0 0 0 -
Peri oral 1
1 0 -
Pigmentation (11.1)
Knuckle 2
3 1 -
Pigmentation (22.2)
75
TABLE 7
76
Pulse Rate
The mean pulse rate was 85.4/ minute in cases and 83.7/ minute in
controls. The mean pulse rate was significantly increased (89.3/ minute) in
cases with haemoglobin less than 6 gm/dl. There was no difference in mean
pulse rate between the different types of anaemia except in the ‘others’ group,
Blood Pressure
The mean body mass index was 21.5 kg/m2 in cases and 21.6 kg/m2 in
77
TABLE -8
Inference
Increased mean pulse rate (p=0.082) as well an signigicantly decreased mean BMI
(P<0.01) m is seen in cases with HB < 6 gm/ml. Mean systolic and diastolic blood
pressure are not significantly different. (p>0.05)
Pulse rate
89.3
90
89
88
87 85.4
86 84.9
Mean (/ minute)
85 83.7 83.6
84
83
82
81
80
Controls Cases Hb<6 gm/dl Hb 6-9 Hb > 9
gm/dl gm/dl
Pulse rate
78
Blood Pressure
140
122.1 121.2 118.7 121.3 122.7
120
100
76.5 76.3 75.2 76.1 77.3
80
60
40
20
0
Controls Cases Hb < 6 gm/dl Hb 6-9 gm/dl Hb > 9 gm/dl
Systolic BP Diastolic BP
21.2 20.9
21
20.8
20.6
20.4
20.2
Controls Cases Hb<6 gm/dl Hb 6-9 Hb > 9
gm/dl gm/dl
Pulse rate
79
TABLE -9
Pulse rate, Blood pressure and BMI with type of Anaemia
Types of Anaemia
DM MH NH NN Others
(n=40) (n=25) (n=18) (n=10) (n=7)
Mean pulse rate 85.0 ± 8.5 82.3 ±12.0 87.0 ± 7.5 84.1 ± 5.2 96.3 ± 14.9
Mean systolic 120.1 ± 9.8 122.3 ± 8.9 118.9 ± 8.3 126 ± 11.7 122.9 ± 9.5
Mean diastolic 75.1 ± 6.7
75.6 ± 10.0 77.2 ± 8.3 79.0 ± 8.8 80.0 ± 8.2
blood pressure
Mean BMI 21.5 ± 1.7 21.4 ± 1.7 21.6 ± 1.8 21.4 ± 1.4 21.8 ± 1.9
Inference
Mean pulse rate significantly higher in the other group (P<0.05). Mean
systolic and diastolic blood pressures are not significantly different (P>0.05)
Mean BMI is not significantly different (P>0.05)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
DM MH NH NN Others
Pulse (per mt) SBP(mm Hg) DBP (mm Hg) BMI (kg/m2)
80
Systemic examination
Systemic Examination
4.5
4
A: JVP
4 4 B: Venous Hum
3.5 C: Cardiomegaly
3 D:Gallop Rhythm
3 E:Flow murmers
2.5
F:Basal cepitations
2 G:Hepatomegaly
2 2 2 2 H:Splenomegaly
1.5
I:Confusion
1 J: Motor Weakness
1 1
0.5 K:Abnormal DTRs
0 0 0 0 0 L:Vibration Sense
0
M:Joint Position Sense
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
N: Romber’s Sign
Systemic Examination
hum, cardiomegaly, flow murmurs and basal crepitations were found only in
cases with haemoglobin less than 6 gm/ dl, with the exception of one
case with haemoglobin between 6 and 9 gm/ dl, who had a flow murmur.
Impairment of vibration and joint position sense were also found only in cases
81
with severe anaemia. Hepatomegaly and splenomegaly were found in all
TABLE 10
1 1
Hepatomegaly 2 0
(11.1) (5.3)
2 1
Splennomegaly 3 0
(22.2) (5.3)
CNS
Confusion - - - -
Power - - - -
DTRs - - - -
2
Vibration - -
(22.2)
1
Position 2 - -
(11.1)
Romberg’s 1 - - -
82
Systemic examination and type of anaemia
and normocytic normochromic blood picture. This is possibly due to the fact
that these cases had less severe anaemia. Hepatomegaly and splenomegaly was
blood picture. Impairment of vibration and joint position sense was seen
Table 11
Types of Anaemia
Symptoms DM MH NH NN Others
(n=20) (n=10) (n=9) (n=5) (n=4)
CVS
2 0
JVP 2 - - -
(10.0) (28.6)
3 1 1
Venous hum 4 - -
(15.3) (8.3) (26.0)
1 0
Cardiomegaly 1 - - -
(5.0) (28.6)
2 1 1
Flow murmur 4 - -
(10.0) (8.3) (50.0)
2 2
RS- Basal crepts 2 - - -
(10.0) 28.6
P/A
1 1 1
Hepatomegaly 2 - 1
(5.0) (8.3) (5.6)
1 1
Splenomegaly 3 0 - 25.0
(5.0) (8.3)
CNS
2
Vibration 2 - - - -
(10.0)
1
Position 1 - - - -
(5.0)
83
Anaemia and Lipid profile
The mean serum VLDL levels were significantly lower (P<0.01) in cases
cases (109.1 mg/dl) as compared to controls (123.5 mg/dl). The effect of anaemia
The mean total cholesterol / HDL ratio was significantly lower (P<0.05) in
cases (4.34) as compared to controls (4.43). The effect of anaemia on TC/HDL ratio
was mild.
The mean LDL / HDL ratio was significantly lower (P<0.01) in cases
was mild.
84
Table -12
250
200
150
mg/dl
100
50
0
TC HDL LDL VLDL TG
Case Control
85
Severity of Anaemia and Lipid profile
The mean serum total cholesterol levels were significantly lower (P<0.01) in
The mean serum HDL levels were significantly lower (P<0.01) in cases with
The mean serum LDL levels were significantly lower (P<0.01) in cases with
The mean serum VLDL levels were significantly lower (P<0.01) in cases
with haemoglobin less than 6 gm/dl (18.0 mg/dl), as compared to cases with
The mean serum triglyceride levels were significantly lower (P<0.01) in cases
with haemoglobin less than 6 gm/dl (94.4 mg/dl), as compared to cases with
The mean serum total cholesterol/HDL ratio was significantly lower (P<0.05)
in cases with Hb less than 6 gm/dl (4.15), as compared to cases with Hb more than
9 gm/dl (4.35).
The mean serum LDL/HDL ratio was significantly lower (P<0.01) in cases
with Hb less than 6 gm/dl (2.45), as compared to cases with Hb more than 9 gm/dl
(2.72).
86
TABLE 13
200
180
160
140
120
Units in
100
80
60
40
20
0
TC HDL LDL VLDL TG
Hb < 6 gm/dl Hb 6-9 gm/dl Hb > 9 gm/dl
87
Type of Anaemia and Lipid Profile
Since the severity of anaemia was found to have a significant effect on the
lipid profile, analysis of the effect of type of anaemia on lipid profile was done by
further subdividing the types of anaemia on the basis of severity and comparing
the lipid profile in groups having varying types of anaemia with similar severity.
There was no significant difference in the mean total cholesterol / HDL ratio
(P>0.05) and mean LDL / HDL ratio (P>0.05) in different types of anaemia with
88
Table 14
>9 36.4 ± 4.2 32.8 ± 4.0 32.4 ± 4.9 36.4 ± 4.1 24. 0 ± 08 P > 0.05
LDL >6 65.7 ± 16.0 64.4 ± 22.5 - - 44.5 ±22.4 P > 0.05
(in
6-9 74.3 ± 17.7 78.4 ±27.2 58.0 ±14.1 - 75.5 ±12.0 P > 0.05
mg/dl)
>9 79.3 ± 18.7 40.6 ± 32.3 93.0 ±23.0 104.4± 12.4 60.0 ± 08 P > 0.05
VLDL <6 18.6 ± 7.3 17.6 ± 5.3 - - 25.0 ± 8.4 P > 0.05
(in
6-9 21.2 ± 5.5 23.1 ± 5.8 25.0 ± 4.2 - 21.0 ±0 P > 0.05
mg/dl)
>9 24.0 ± 5.0 20.2 ± 4.4 25.4 ±6.7 21.8 ±5.2 23.0 ± 08 P > 0.05
TG( in <6 81.6 ± 36.3 89.0 ± 27.3 - - 124.8 ±41.1` P > 0.05
mg/dl)
6-9 102.5 ± 27.8 115.7 ± 29.3 125.0 ± 21.2 - 103.5 ± 0.7 P > 0.05
>9 113.2 ± 26.4 101.4 ± 23.4 126.6 ±32.4 109.5 ±25.7 114.0 ± o8 P > 0.05
TC <6 5.0 ± 0.007 2.2± 1.0 - - 3.8 ± 0.4 P > 0.05K
/HDL
6-9 4.1 ±0.08 4.3 ± 0.9 - - 4.0 1.5 P > 0.05K
>9 4.4 ± 0.7 4.4 ± 1.1 3.8 ±0.06 4.5 ± 0.5 4.5 08 P > 0.05K
LDL <6 3.0 ± 0.6 2.8 ± 1.0 4.7 ± 0.8 - 1.8 ±0.6 P > 0.05K
HDL
6-9 2.5 ± 0.06 4.7 ± 0.7 0.5 - 2.6 ± 1.2 P > 0.05K
>9 2.1 ± 0.6 1.23 ± 1.1 2.9 ± 0.7 2.9 ± 0.5 2.5 ± 0# P > 0.05K
Inference:
There is no statistically significant difference in lipid fractions between
different types of anemia (P>0.05)
# - p value could not be computed as there was only one case. K –Kruskal Wallies Test
89
DISCUSSION
from Jan 2016 to June 2016 is discussed here and results have been
Age
All cases in this study were between 14 and 75 years. Majority of the cases
were middle aged (30-60 years). Anaemic cases younger than 50 years were
more likely to have more severe anaemia, as compared to cases older than 50 years,
who were more likely to have less severe anaemia. This is probably due to younger
individuals having a higher risk of worm infestations, and also the onset of
menopause with cessation of menstrual blood loss after the age of 50 years.
Sex
Dimorphic anaemia was the most commonly seen type of anaemia in this
study. Microcytic hypochromic anaemia was the second most common, followed by
picture. Only a few cases of megaloblastic anaemia and pancytopenia, and one case
90
of chronic myeloid leukemia were seen. This is consistent with standard
Symptoms
Cases with more severe anaemia were more likely to have symptoms and had
more number of symptoms. Patients with haemoglobin more than 10 gm/dl were
evaluation. This is consistent with standard textbooks of medicine which state that
fever, loss of appetite and loss of weight were equally frequent in the
91
This is possibly due to the fact that these cases had less severe anaemia.
Personal history
8 cases were vegetarians. Vegetarians were more likely to have more severe
anaemia and to have dimorphic anaemia. Vegetarians are likely to have more severe
Pallor was the most common finding on general physical examination. Cases
with more severe anaemia were found to be more likely to have findings on general
physical examination. Signs were usually not seen in cases with haemoglobin less
seen only in cases with dimorphic anaemia and microcytic hypochromic anaemia.
Knuckle pigmentation and perioral pigmentation was seen only in cases with
Pulse Rate
The mean pulse rate was higher in anaemic cases when compared to non
anaemic controls. The mean pulse rate was higher in cases with more severe
anaemia. The pulse rate has been described to be higher in case of anaemia,
92
Ickx, Rigolet and Linden33, in 2000, demonstrated that anaemia causes a
rise in pulse rate and stroke volume in patients whose haemoglobin was lowered
Blood Pressure
The mean blood pressure was comparable in cases and controls. It was
lower in cases with more severe anaemia. This is due to peripheral vasodilatation,
oxygenation.
The mean body mass index was comparable in cases and controls. It was lower
Systemic examination
The most common findings on systemic examination were venous hum and
congestive cardiac failure were only seen in cases with severe anaemia. Features
93
This was consistent with a study done by Graettinger, Parsons and
that the mean serum total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL and triglyceride levels are
decreased in anaemia.
The mean total cholesterol was found to be lower in anaemic cases when
compared to controls. The decrease in mean serum cholesterol was not due to a
caused by a reduction in all the major lipoprotein families, including mean HDL,
LDL, VLDL and triglycerides. There was a very large decrease in mean total
cholesterol and LDL levels, and a large decrease in mean HDL levels, resulting in a
mild fall in mean TC/HDL and LDL/HDL ratios. There was a mild decrease in
Rifkind and Gale4,5 in 1967 showed that anaemia was associated with
hypocholesterolemia and the decrease in serum cholesterol was not due to a specific
lowering of any of the serum lipoprotein families, and that hypocholesterolemia was
94
Severity of Anaemia and Lipid profile
Patients with more severe anaemia were found to have a larger fall in mean
total cholesterol and all the lipid sub fractions. This suggests that the severity of
with iron deficiency anaemia were directly related to the hemoglobin levels.
The type of anaemia did not have a significant effect on the mean lipid levels.
This suggests that it is anaemia per se, and not the type of anaemia that is
anaemia, and liver associated anaemia. The study showed that the plasma
levels. The authors concluded that low haematocrit, not the type of anaemia, is the
95
SUMMARY
This study was done on 50 anaemic cases and 50 non anaemic controls to
Younger individuals are more likely to have severe anaemia. Cases with
severe anaemia have more symptoms. They have higher mean pulse rate, lower
mean blood pressure and mean BMI. Vegetarians are more likely to have severe
anaemia. Cases with severe anaemia also have more signs on examination.
seen in anaemia.
Further studies are required to study the long term effect of anaemia on the
risk of developing atherosclerosis, and to study the long term effect of treatment of
96
CONCLUSION
Medicine, T M C H ,Thanjavur from Jan 2016 to June 2016 are presented here.
1) Majority of cases with anaemia were in the age group of 30-60 years.
5) The most common presenting symptom was fatigue. Patients with severe
7) Pallor was the most common finding on general physical examination. Cases
with more severe anaemia were more likely to have findings on general
physical examination.
8) The mean pulse rate was higher in cases. The mean pulse rate was higher in
cases with severe anaemia. The mean blood pressure and BMI were lower in
97
9) The most common findings on systemic examination were venous hum and
congestive cardiac failure were only seen in cases with severe anaemia.
10) The mean total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL and triglyceride levels, along
compared to controls.
11) There was a larger reduction in mean total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL
and triglyceride levels, along with TC/HDL and LDL/HDL ratios with
12) The type of anaemia did not have a significant effect on the mean lipid levels.
98
Bibliography
850.
haemoglobin level, serum cholesterol and blood pressure. Lancet. 1970 Mar
21;1:589-590.
8. Burtis CA, Ashwood ER. Tietz. Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. 3rd ed.
9. Nelson DL, Cox MM. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. 3rd ed. New York:
10. Guyton AC, Hall GE. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 10th ed. Philadelphia:
11. Ganong WF. Review of Medical Physiology. 21st ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill;
2003. p. 477-9.
12. Murray RK, Granner DK, Mayes PA, Rodwell VW. Harper’s Biochemistry. 24th
Nov;82(5):1574-1594.
14. Castelli WP, Garrison RJ, Wilson PWF, Abbot RD, Kalousdian S, Kannel WB.
15. The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. Mortality rates after
10.5 years for participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: findings
16. Keys A. Seven Countries. A Multivariate Analysis of Death and Coronary Heart
17. Gotto AM. Cholesterol intake and serum cholesterol level. N Engl J Med. 1991
Mar 28;324(13):912-913.
18. National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel. Executive summary of the
third report of the National Cholesterol Education program (NCEP) Expert Panel
20. Fuster V, Alexander RW, O’Rourke RA. Hurst’s The Heart. 11th ed. New York:
14;340(2):115-126.
17;344:793-795.
23. Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, Polonsky KS. Williams Textbook of
24. Allen JM, Thompson GR, Myant NB, Steiner R, Oakley CM. Cardiovascular
1980;44:361-368.
25. Greer JP, Foerster J, Lukens JN, Rodgers GM, Paraskevas F, Glader B.
26. Warrel Da, Cox TM, Firth JD, Benz Jr EJ. Oxford Textbook of Medicine. 4th ed.
27. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease.
29. Shah SN. API Textbook of Medicine. 7th ed. Mumbai: The Association of
30. Allen JB, Allen FB. The minimum acceptable level of hemoglobin. Int
32. Weiskopf RB, Feiner J, Hopf H, Viele MK, Watson JJ, Lieberman J, et al. Heart
Feb;43(2):235-240.
33. Ickx BE, Rigolet M, Van der Linden PJ. Cardiovascular and metabolic response
34. Varat MA, Adolph RJ, Fowler NO. Cardiovascular effects of anemia. Am Heart J.
1972 Mar;83(3):415-426.
35. Graettinger JS, Parsons RL, Campbell JA. A correlation of clinical and
hemodynamic studies in patients with mild and severe anemia with and without
36. Ioannou GN, Rockey DC, Bryson CL, Weiss NS. Iron deficiency and
Sep;113:276-280.
37. Zinner MJ, Schwartz SI, Ellis H. Maingot’s Abdominal Operations. 10th ed.
38. Bhatla N. Jeffcoate’s Principles of Gynaecology. 6th ed. London: Arnold; 2001. p.
560-80.
39. Handin RI, Lux SE, Stossel TP. Blood: Principles & Practice of Hematology.
40. Tse WT, Lux SE. Red blood cell membrane disorders. Br J Haematol.
1999;104:2-13.
41. Beutler E. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. N Engl J Med. 1991
Jan 17;324(3):169-174.
in Medical Practice. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989. p. 137-71.
43. Bunn HF. Pathogenesis and treatment of sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 1997
Sep 11;337(11):762-769.
44. Oliveri NF. The β-Thalassemias. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 8;341(2):99-109.
46. Brown KE, Tisdale J, Barrett J, Dunbar CE, Young NS. Hepatitis associated
47. Fisch P, Handgretinger R, Schaefer HE. Pure red cell aplasia. Br J Haematol.
2000;111:1010-1022.
48. Brenner BM. Brenner & Rector’s The Kidney. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders;
49. Hoffman R, Benz Jr EJ, Shattil SJ, Furie B, Cohen HJ, Silberstein LE et al.
50. Toh B, Van Driel IR, Gleeson PA. Pernicious anemia. N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov
13;337(20):1441-1448.
51. Andrews NC. Disorders of iron metabolism. N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec
23;341(26):1986-1995.
52. Cazzola M, Barosi G, Gobbi PG, Inverizzi R, Riccardi A, Ascari E. Natural
312.
53. Beutler E, Lichtman M, Coller BS, Kipps TJ, Seligsohn U. Williams Hematology.
55. El-Hazmi MAF, Jabbar FA, Warsu AS. Cholesterol and triglyceride levels in
patients with sickle cell anemia. Scan J Clin Lab Invest. 1987;47:351-354.
56. Seip M, Srede S. Serum Cholesterol and triglycerides in children with anemia.
deficient children during hemolytic anemia induced by fava bean ingestion. Int J
58. El-Hazmi MAF, Warsy AS, Al-Swailem A, Al-Swailem A, Bahakim H. Red cell
59. Akinyanju PA, Akinyanju CP. Plasma and red cell lipids in sickle cell disease.
60. Au YPT, Schilling RF. Relationship between anemia and cholesterol metabolism
61. Choi JW, Kim SK, Pai SH. Changes in serum lipid concentration during iron
depletion and after iron supplementation. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2001;31(2):151-156.
62. Tanzer F, Hizel S, Cetinkaya O, et al. Serum free carnitine and total triglyceride
levels in children with iron deficiency anemia. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2001;71:66-
69.
63. Nimer SD, Champlin RE, Golde DW. Serum cholesterol lowering activity of
3300.
cells: Evidence from studies in patients with leukemia. Lancet. 1985 Nov
23;2:1150-1153.
patients with hairy cell leukemia. Positive correlation with spleen size but not
with tumor cell burden or low density lipoprotein receptor activity. Cancer.
1995;76:423-428.
602.
69. Gilbert HS, Ginsberg H. Hypocholesterolemia as a manifestation of disease
71. Mat O, Stolear JC, Georges B. Blood lipid profiles in hemodialysis patients
2002 Jun;48(3):156-161.
74. Evans JG, Prior IAM. Hypolipidemia in anaemia. Lancet. 1967 Dec 23;2:1362-
1363.
75. Boga M, Szemere PA. Relation between serum cholesterol and haemoglobin
76. Bottiger LE, Carlson LA. Relation between serum cholesterol and triglyceride
77. Sullivan JL. Iron and the sex difference in heart disease risk. Lancet. 1981 Jun
13;1:1293-1294.
78. McCord JM. Is iron sufficiency a risk factor in ischemic heart disease?
Mar;83(3):1006-1014.
81. Reddy MV. Statistics for Mental Health Care Research. NIMHANS publication;
2002.
Annexures
Proforma
Occupation:
Fatigue Yes/ No
Dyspnoea Yes/ No
Giddiness Yes/ No
Palpitations Yes/ No
Angina Yes/ No
Pica Yes/ No
Dysphagia Yes/ No
Fever Yes/ No
Bleeding Yes/ No
Malaena Yes/ No
Haemoglobinuria Yes/ No
Menorrhagia Yes/ No
Pregnancy Yes/ No
Past History:
Hypertension Yes/ No
IHD Yes/ No
CVA Yes/ No
AIDS Yes/ No
Personal History:
Smoking Yes/ No
Alcohol Yes/ No
Drug History:
Diuretics Yes/ No
Steroids Yes/ No
NSAIDs Yes/ No
Family History
Anaemia Yes/ No
Jaundice Yes/ No
Gallstones Yes/ No
On Examination:
Pallor Yes/ No
Koilonychia Yes/ No
Icterus Yes/ No
Lymphadenopathy Yes/ No
Glossitis Yes/ No
Petechiae Yes/ No
BP: mm of Hg
Weight: kgs
Height: cms
Cardiovascular system
Cardiomegaly Yes/ No
S3 Yes/ No
Respiratory system
Abdomen
Hepatomegaly Yes/ No
Splenomegaly Yes/ No
Confusion Yes/ No
Power
DTRs
1. Complete Haemogram
Hb g/dl
PCV %,
TC * 103 /mm3
DC %P %L %E %M %B,
ESR mm/hr
MCV fL
MCH pg
MCHC g/dl
Peripheral Smear:
2. Lipid Profile
HDL mg/dl
LDL mg/dl
VLDL mg/dl,
Triglycerides mg/dl
Albumin
Sugar
Microscopy PC / HPF
EPC / HPF
RBC / HPF
SGOT U/L
SGPT U/L
SAP U/L
TSH μU/ml
T3 ng/dl
T4 μg/dl
9. FBS mg/dl
PPBS mg/dl
– 613004 and to use my personal clinical data and result of investigation for the purpose
of analysis and to study the nature of disease. I also give consent for further
investigations.
Place :
• At the time of announcing the results and suggestions, name and identity of the
• Taking part in this study is voluntary. You are free to decide whether to
participate in this study or to withdraw at any time; your decision will not result
• The results of the special study may be intimated to you at the end of the study
period or during the study if anything is found abnormal which may aid in the
management or treatment.
Date:
PATIENTS
*ANAEMIA
Sl.No Ip.No. Unit Patient's name A/S HB TC DC RBC PCV RBS UREA CR TC TGL HDL LDL VLDL
TYPES
1 36297 M4 Mr.Panchavarnam 70/M 3.8 5,200 59,30,11 1.5 12 94 28 0.8 101 175 28 38 35 DM
2 37308 M3 Mr.Veeramuthu 40/M 6.0 6,600 56,40,04 2 12 121 22 0.7 136 130 19 91 26 NH
3 34943 M5 Mr.Stalin 16/M 8.4 7,100 65,20,15 1.5 12 80 18 0.8 124 100 26 78 20 MH
4 34586 M3 Mr.Murugayyan 70/M 9.2 6,100 80,14,06 3 22 150 17 0.9 156 130 22 108 26 NH
5 33992 M5 Mr.Sutharathinam 76/M 6.8 6,300 78,20,02 2.4 16 84 16 0.6 112 95 24 69 19 DM
6 34009 M6 Mr.Kasinathan 52/M 5 7,300 68,30,02 2 14 90 16 1 72 110 28 22 22 DM
7 36978 M4 Mr.Natarajan 65/M 9.0 7,600 48,30,22 3.2 24 89 41 1.1 124 130 25 73 26 MH
8 36005 M3 Mr.marimuthu 62/M 8.6 6,100 78,20,02 2.9 22 86 18 0.9 88 130 19 43 26 DM
9 39564 M3 Mr.Gobinath 29/M 7.2 4,200 54,40,06 2.6 18 76 29 0.6 128 130 21 81 26 MH
10 37332 M3 Mr.Manickam 65/M 9.4 7,100 68,28,04 3.4 28 110 31 0.9 141 145 23 89 29 DM
11 39044 M4 Mr..Govindaraj 65/M 9.6 5,800 45,50,05 3.6 30 83 39 0.8 135 115 24 88 23 DM
12 34278 M1 Mr.Backiyaraj 37/M 8 3,600 64,34,02 2.8 20 109 21 0.6 99 160 30 37 32 OTHERS
13 39579 M3 Mr.Selvakumar 37/M 5.6 7,200 58,38,04 2 14 78 21 0.8 119 130 23 70 26 MH
14 36238 M4 Mr..Muruganandam 35/M 6.0 6,900 62,36,02 2.2 18 92 36 0.6 105 100 24 61 20 DM
15 36333 M4 Mr.Raman 60/M 9.4 8,100 68,30,02 3.3 26 93 42 1.2 142 145 21 92 29 DM
16 34588 M3 Mr.Kannan 38/M 9.6 6,300 60,28,12 3.5 28 124 20 0.8 94 85 16 61 17 NH
17 35537 M1 Mr.Rengasamy 40/M 10.2 7,100 78,18,04 3.6 26 112 26 1.2 120 125 21 74 25 NH
18 36131 M3 Mr.Ezhumalai 37/M 9.6 5,400 68,31,01 3.3 24 78 22 0.5 60 90 22 20 18 NH
19 35702 M1 Mr.Shanmugam 65/M 7.6 8,700 68,30,02 2.9 20 76 42 0.9 105 140 23 55 27 DM
20 38966 M4 Mr.Yesudass 45/M 9.6 8,000 64,28,08 3.2 24 95 42 1.2 144 130 26 92 26 MH
21 34854 M4 Mr.Kathayyan 80/M 10.8 7,000 82,16,02 3.6 26 130 28 0.9 160 140 31 101 28 MH
22 34814 M4 Mr.Sethu 38/M 11 11600 78,18,04 3.8 30 91 20 1 157 165 29 95 33 NH
PATIENTS
*ANAEMIA
Sl.No Ip.No. Unit Patient's name A/S HB TC DC RBC PCV RBS UREA CR TC TGL HDL LDL VLDL
TYPES
1 34956 M5 Ms.Nirmala 18/F 6.4 8,400 68,30,02 2.4 20 88 18 0.7 116 110 26 68 22 DM
2 33101 M2 Ms.Ranjitha 20/F 9.6 7,800 56,40,04 3.6 28 94 15 0.7 158 105 24 113 21 NN
3 35051 M6 Mrs.Samuthiravalli 29/F 9 6,100 38,60,02 3.2 24 89 22 0.9 140 110 31 87 22 MH
4 40575 M5 Mrs.Lillismary 45/F 3 4,200 54,40,06 1.1 10 184 16 0.9 133 85 25 91 17 OTHERS
5 39731 M1 Mrs.Mariyammal 40/F 9.2 7,800 68,22,10 1.2 10 99 31 0.8 104 140 16 60 28 DM
6 39780 M1 Mrs.Kanga 40/F 6.3 8,300 74,20,06 3.2 10 102 38 0.9 119 125 22 72 25 NH
7 38154 M8 Mrs.Sathiyavani 25/F 3.2 3,800 78,20,02 1.2 10 85 16 1 108 155 19 58 31 OTHERS
8 36326 M4 Ms.Akila 16/F 9.5 7,300 65,32,03 3.6 10 76 33 0.9 91 125 26 40 25 DM
9 40311 M4 Mrs.Annakili 28/F 8.4 4,600 40,56,04 3 10 111 29 1 121 135 24 70 27 DM
10 39776 M1 Mrs.Masilamani 30/F 4.3 4,900 54,36,10 1.2 10 96 27 0.6 102 90 18 65 19 DM
11 36417 M2 Mrs.Sumithira 35/F 7.4 7,000 44,50,06 2.8 20 78 19 1 132 120 25 83 24 MH
12 36172 M3 Mrs.Arockiyamary 40/F 4.6 4,400 70,28,02 1.3 10 99 35 0.6 110 100 24 66 20 DM
13 36222 M4 Ms.Pavithira 16/F 8.6 6,400 52,38,10 3 14 86 24 0.8 123 130 34 63 26 MH
14 39872 M2 Mrs.Arockiyamary 47/F 5.6 3,400 58,39,03 2.1 14 157 35 1.2 132 155 21 80 31 OTHERS
15 39605 M3 Mrs.Jayam 37/F 9.4 13,000 60,38,02 3.4 24 86 28 0.5 133 145 28 76 29 DM
16 39459 M6 Mrs.Banumathi 35/F 9.6 5,600 60,28,12 3.6 28 82 34 1.3 151 130 33 92 26 NN
17 229320 OP Mrs.Amaravathy 55/F 6.8 7,600 72,26,02 2.6 20 95 28 0.5 153 115 33 97 23 DM
18 223949 OP Ms.Sobana 13/F 10.8 8,000 60,34,06 3.8 30 100 14 1.2 169 120 39 106 24 NN
19 223966 OP Mrs.Nagalakshmi 37/F 7.8 6,400 60,32,08 3 20 89 27 0.7 148 140 34 86 28 DM
20 36486 M5 Mrs.Chinnaponnu 45/F 7.4 5,600 60,36,04 3 22 152 21 0.8 156 125 29 102 25 DM
21 224026 OP Mrs.Vetriselvi 45/F 9.8 9,800 56,40,04 3.4 26 89 33 0.6 155 130 29 100 26 MH
22 224147 OP Ms.Thaiyalnayaki 13/F 9.4 9,300 58,38,04 3.5 26 101 29 0.9 144 165 36 75 33 DM
23 224173 OP Mrs.manimekalai 45/F 8.6 7,200 56,40,04 3 24 202 21 1.1 164 200 37 87 40 MH
24 39605 M3 Mrs.Santhi 37/F 10.4 13,000 60,38,02 3.6 24 86 28 0.5 133 145 28 76 29 NN
25 39459 M6 Mrs.banumathi 35/F 9.8 5,600 60,28,12 3.2 28 82 34 1.3 151 130 33 92 26 DM
26 229622 OP Mrs.Vasantha 45/F 8.2 9,800 56,40,04 3.1 24 89 33 0.6 155 130 29 100 26 MH
27 229482 OP Mrs.Sangeetha 18/F 11.2 9,300 58,38,04 3.9 30 101 29 0.9 144 165 36 75 33 NN
28 229433 OP Ms.Chitra 20/f 8.6 7,200 56,40,04 3.2 24 202 21 1.1 164 200 37 87 40 NH
CONTROL
Sl.No OP.NO Unit Patient's name A/S HB TC DC RBC PCV RBS UREA CR TC TGL HDL LDL VLDL
1 201313 OP Mrs.Raji 59/f 11.8 7,300 68,20,12 3.9 30 88 18 0.8 160 135 30 103 27
2 201343 OP Mrs.Kangam 50/F 12 8,500 59,37,04 4 32 99 54 1.6 187 125 41 121 25
3 201089 OP Mrs.Gunavathi 35/F 12.2 6,300 72,26,02 4.1 34 95 28 0.5 153 115 33 97 23
4 201215 OP Mrs.Veerammal 51/F 11.8 8,100 64,32,04 3.8 30 157 18 0.7 128 115 22 83 23
5 201226 OP Mrs.Vasantha 50/F 12.2 6,200 49,44,07 4.2 36 146 27 0.6 113 145 22 62 29
6 119461 OP Ms.Priyanka 18/F 12.4 6,300 72,26,02 4.2 36 95 28 0.5 153 115 33 97 23
7 203355 OP Mrs.Vallinayaki 29/F 12 8,500 59,37,04 4 34 99 54 1.6 187 125 41 121 25
8 205493 OP Mrs.Anjukam 28/F 11.8 6,900 64,33,03 4 32 89 18 1 262 385 34 151 77
9 2055633 OP Mrs.Amusu 38/F 12.8 3,800 78,20,02 4.5 38 85 16 1 108 155 19 58 31
10 206175 OP Mrs.Gunapathi 25/F 12 8,000 64,28,08 4.4 38 95 42 1.2 144 130 26 92 26
11 206278 OP Mrs.Asha 29/F 11.6 4,800 59,40,01 4.1 34 122 25 0.9 98 130 18 54 26
12 128123 OP Ms.Ragini 20/F 12 3,800 78,20,02 4 32 85 16 1 108 155 19 58 31
13 186131 OP Mrs.Rani 45/F 12.4 8,000 64,28,08 4.2 36 95 42 1.2 144 130 26 92 26
14 206897 OP Mrs.megaraj 40/F 12.2 5,600 60,28,12 4.2 38 82 34 1.3 151 130 33 92 26
15 207082 OP Mrs.Saroja 55/F 12.2 6,400 69,23,08 4.3 34 99 46 1.5 122 155 26 65 31
16 207753 OP Mrs.Thangam 70/F 12.6 6,800 70,28,02 4.4 34 88 14 1 170 120 39 107 24
17 195717 OP Mrs.Shanthi 40/F 12.4 6,100 48,50,02 4.3 36 152 21 0.8 156 125 29 102 25
18 223090 OP Mrs.manimekalai 58/F 12 6,900 52,46,02 4.1 32 202 21 1.1 164 200 37 87 40
19 223144 OP Ms.Punitha 18/F 12 5,900 64,30,06 4 32 96 23 0.8 159 145 29 101 29
20 227529 OP Mrs.Suseela 70/F 11.8 8,200 44,48,08 3.9 30 95 18 0.9 118 130 20 72 26
21 227659 OP Mrs.maheswari 59/F 12.8 6,100 48,50,02 4.6 38 152 21 0.8 156 125 29 102 25
22 238851 OP Mrs.Chandra 48/F 12.2 6,500 64,33,03 4.2 34 194 33 1.2 143 155 24 88 31
23 245803 OP Mrs.Saroja 20/F 12.8 8,600 56,40,04 4.7 40 89 33 0.6 155 130 29 100 26
24 248497 OP Mrs,Sagarabanu 27/F 12.8 7,700 58,38,04 4.8 40 101 29 0.9 144 165 36 75 33
25 250186 OP Mrs.josepin 36/F 12.6 7,200 56,40,04 4.4 38 115 25 0.8 152 185 29 86 37
26 252750 OP Mrs.Saraswathy 50/F 12.6 8,400 65,30,05 4.4 38 202 21 1.1 164 200 37 87 40
27 252688 OP Ms.Shanmugapriya 23/F 12.6 7,200, 54,40,06 4.2 34 130 28 0.9 160 140 31 101 28
28 252474 OP Mrs.Sobiya 35/F 11.8 6,100 48,50,02 3.9 32 152 21 0.8 156 125 29 102 25
CONTROL
Sl.No OP.NO Unit Patient's name A/S HB TC DC RBC PCV RBS UREA CR TC TGL HDL LDL VLDL
1 192494 OP Mr.Rajeshkanna 14/m 13.6 6,100 48,50,02 4.6 40 152 21 0.8 156 125 29 102 25
2 192495 OP Mr.Subramanian 60/M 13.8 6,900 52,46,02 4.5 38 202 21 1.1 164 200 37 87 40
3 193437 OP Mr.Siraj 40/M 14.2 8,000 63,36,01 4.8 40 134 23 0.8 122 125 19 78 25
4 193580 OP Mr.Paulraj 40/M 13.8 4,800 59,40,01 4.6 40 122 25 0.9 98 130 18 54 26
5 195471 OP Mr.Selvaraj 40/M 13.8 5,800 45,50,05 4.5 38 83 39 0.8 135 115 24 88 23
6 198083 OP Mr.Pandian 46/M 13.2 4,200 54,40,06 4.4 38 76 29 0.6 128 130 21 81 26
7 199729 OP Mr.Regan 29/M 14 7,100 48,42,10 4.8 40 114 20 0.9 102 90 18 66 18
8 202420 OP Mr.Saminathan 60/M 13.6 8,400 56,45,09 4.4 38 96 24 0.7 160 110 27 111 22
9 202408 OP Mr.Raja 18/M 14 5,600 50,38,12 4.6 40 142 28 1.2 140 125 21 94 25
10 202396 OP Mr.David 43/M 14.2 9,600 58,41,01 4.6 38 119 28 0.8 140 165 29 78 33
11 205432 OP Mr.Vicky kumar 14/M 13.6 11,000 82,16,02 4.2 38 132 33 1 165 140 32 105 28
12 205487 OP Mr.Senthilkumar 28/M 14.2 8,300 68,30,02 4.9 42 199 38 1.5 147 135 27 93 27
13 205534 OP Mr.Vijayakumar 43/M 13 6,300 60,28,12 4.1 42 124 20 0.8 94 85 16 61 17
14 207114 OP Mr.Gobinath 15/M 13.8 6,100 80,14,06 4.5 40 150 17 0.9 156 130 22 108 26
15 209685 OP Mr.Dinesh 15/M 13.4 7,100 48,42,10 4.4 40 114 20 0.9 102 90 18 66 18
16 153223 OP Mr.Durairaj 50/M 13.8 8,400 56,45,09 4.5 40 96 24 0.7 160 110 27 111 22
17 245742 OP Mr.Shiyamprasad 15/M 13.6 9,800 56,40,04 4.5 38 89 33 0.6 155 130 29 100 26
18 181001 OP Mr.Vishnuvarthan 17/M 13.4 9,300 58,38,04 4.3 38 101 29 0.9 144 165 36 75 33
19 245740 OP Mr.Ramesh 22/M 14.6 7,200 56,40,04 4.9 44 202 21 1.1 164 200 37 87 40
20 245810 OP Mr.Moorthy 31/M 14.4 13,000 60,38,02 4.9 44 86 28 0.5 133 145 28 76 29
21 245801 OP Mr.naveen 30/M 13.6 7,200 56,40,04 4.4 40 202 21 1.1 164 200 37 87 40
22 249722 OP Mr.Karthikleyan 36/M 14.6 13,000 60,38,02 5 46 86 28 0.5 133 145 28 76 29