Abstract of Plan of Thesis: Title
Abstract of Plan of Thesis: Title
Abstract of Plan of Thesis: Title
A synopsis
Submitted for partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree
of
of
Baba Farid University Of Health Sciences,
Faridkot, Punjab
2020
Deeksha
A synopsis
Submitted for the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of
Of
Baba Farid University of Health Sciences,
Faridkot, Punjab
2020
Deeksha
Supervisor Co-Supervisor
Research setting 8
Target population 8
8
Sample and sampling technique
8
Variables
9
Development and description of tool
9
Criteria for sample selection
9
Content validity of tool
9
Pilot study
10
Reliability of tool
10
Description of intervention 10
Data collection procedure 10
Ethical consideration 10
Plan for data analysis 10
IV. LIST OF REFERENCES 11-12
CHAPTER I
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Introduction
“Every child has a different learning style and pace. Each child is unique, not only
capable of learning but also capable of succeeding”
Indian former President, Dr. Abdul Kalam is always talking about 'school drop outs' and is
campaigning for developing their skills. Lack of awareness about 'learning disorder' or
'dyslexia' is one of the reasons for not identifying great talent and potential in school children.
It is generally reported that approximately 5-20 percent of the children across the world suffer
from learning disorder2
Research in the area of learning disorders in India began only recently. Students have
experienced academic problems associated with learning disorders for a long time, but those
problems were ignored in the crowded classrooms. The study of learning disorders is
gradually gaining momentum as more and more students are experiencing problems in
academic and non-academic areas. Current literature in 7july, 2014 indicates that 10-14% of
the 416 million children in India have learning disorders making it the most widespread
disorder. It is estimated that India has five students with learning disorders in every average-
sized class.3
1
commercially and critically acclaimed, and it bought a general awareness amongst parents
and teachers as to why some children can’t perform up to the mark. Students with learning
disorders may become so frustrated with their performance in school that by adolescent they
may feel like failure want to drop out of school or may develop behavioral problems so
learning disorders should be identified as early as possible during school years.4
Learning disability (LD) is a general term that describes specific kinds of learning problems.
A learning disability can cause a person to have trouble learning and using certain skills. The
skills most often affected are reading, writing, listening, speaking, reasoning, and doing math.
Learning disabilities vary from person to person. One person with LD may not have the same
kind of learning problems as another person with LD. One person may have trouble with
reading and writing. Another person with LD may have problems understanding math. Still
another person may have trouble in each of these areas, as well as with understanding what
people are saying (National Dissemination Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities
[NICHCY].5
LD is a group of disorders that affects people’s ability to either interpret what they see and
hear or to link information from different parts of the brain. These limitations can show up in
many ways: as specific difficulties with spoken and written language, coordination, self-
control, or attention. Such difficulties extend to schoolwork and can impede learning to read,
write, or do math.6
In India around 13-14% of all school children suffer from learning disorders. These
children are labeled as failures by the society we live in but in reality it’s not that these
children who have failed but it is the education system that has failed, failed in recognizing
and helping them. As teachers are the link between the children and education system,
2
it’s their level of understanding and awareness that sets the path for these children’s
future.8
understanding and awareness that sets the path for these children’s future.
According to World Health Report, 15% of children have serious learning disabilities.
Epidemiological study of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders conducted by ICMR
indicated the overall prevalence of mental and learning disorders in Indian children to be
12.5%. Mental disorders account for 5 of the top 10 leading causes of disability in the world
for children above 5 years of age. Besides the increase in number of children seeking help for
emotional problems, over the years, the type of problems has also undergone a tremendous
change.9
Indian journal and medical science stated that children with learning disabilities and co-
occuring ADHD need to identified at an early age to prevent poor school performance and
behavioral problems.10
Learning disability is a term that refers to a group of disorders in listening, speaking, reading,
writing and mathematics. Learning disabilities were thought to be rare but statistics in India
shows that 13%-14% of children are affected by this handicap. The world over 10 out every
100 school children are said to suffer from learning disabilities. Nearly 3 million students
receive special education services every year and of those halves are diagnosed with learning
disabilities, which is 15% of US population 3. Today, almost 3 million school age students
receive special education services because of learning disabilities. Unfortunately, most
schools fail to lend a sympathetic ear to their problems. As a result these children are branded
as failures11.
Current legislation for learning disability in India a SLD certificate with a LD assessment
and IQ assessment report from a psychiatrist who held a rank above of Assistant Surgeon
Current Legislations for Learning Disabilities in India and Future Prospects 91 in any
Government Hospital was valid in Kerala. The report needed to specify the deficit
(dysgraphia/dyscalculia/dyslexia) and be countersigned by the DEO. The request for an
assessment and later submission for provisions must be made by the school principal. Due to
some discrepancies, this system is being reviewed this year.12
Nurses play a pivotal role in prevention and in this context also the ability of the nurse to
assess the school teachers level of knowledge regarding learning disability ensures prevention
of complications related to learning disability. Thus the researcher’s aims to assess the
3
knowledge of teachers in primary schools in order to develop an information regarding
learning disabilities which can be further used as a reference by teachers in future.
Problem Statement
Operational Definitions
Hypothesis
H0 There will be no statistical significant difference in the post test score of
knowledge among teachers between experimental and control group as measured by
self structured questionnaire at P<0.05 level of significant.
CHAPTER II
Review of Literature
The studies reviewed for the present study is organized under the following headings
5
A. Review of literature related to behavioural problems associated with learning
disabilities.
B. Review of literature related to Knowledge of school teachers regarding learning
disabilities.
A study was conducted to investigate teacher perceptions about learning disabilities in the
public schools of slum areas of Chandigarh, India. A purposive sampling technique was
adopted to obtain a sample of 80 teachers from 103 schools there. A cross-sectional
questionnaire was used to measure the teachers’ perceptions regarding learning disabilities. It
was found that 56.3% of them were aware of learning disabilities and approximately 68% of
respondents believed that they did encounter such children in school.13
A study was conducted on 957 school children aged 9-11 years from an urban area of
Ludhiana, India to assess the prevalence of learning disabilities. The study was conducted in
two stages. In the first stage, a screening method ‘response to intervention’ was used to detect
common 14
learning difficulties in children. Based on the screening method results and parents'
interviews, 45.6% of the children were estimated to have learning disabilities, of which
36.5% had significant problems. Conduct disorders (5.4%), Hyperkinetic syndrome (12.9%),
scholastic under achievement (17%), and enuresis (20.3%) were detected to be the main pre-
6
disposing factors in children. Close co-operation between school teachers, parents, and health
care providers is suggested to ensure healthy development of children.15.
B. Review of literature related to knowledge of school teachers regarding learning
disabilities
A study found that 67% of teachers had no understanding about learning disabilities among
primary school children, 20% of them had a very low level of understanding and only 12%
knew about specific learning disabilities in the Haridwar region. A study conducted to
investigated a sample of 38 school teachers to explore a teacher training program’s
effectiveness for their understanding and knowledge about specific learning disabilities. By
using convenient sampling technique and a quasi-experimental study, they found such teacher
training programs played a significant role in increasing the level of knowledge about
learning disabilities among primary school teachers in Bhainyawala, Dehradun.17
A study conducted to assess the knowledge of primary school teachers about learning
disabilities and their prevention among children in Bangalore. A self-administered structured
questionnaire was prepared and administered to 50 primary school teachers between the First
to Seventh standard based on a purposive sampling technique. The outcome was that teachers
did acquire adequate knowledge regarding learning disabilities. According to Karande,
Sholapurwala and Kulkarni (2011), 15% of school children were affected by learning
disabilities in India. Although the government has carried out various awareness campaigns
over the last decade, much is needed to be done to achieve an ideal scenario. For this,
teachers will play a vital role, so proper training is required for screening for learning
disability in primary school. School management should offer structured teaching programs
and employ special instructors to ensure that children receive regular remedial education.18
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
7
Research Design- A Quasi experimental non- equivalent control group design will be used.
E 01 X O2
C 01 O2
E - Experimental group
C - Control group
O1- Pre-test
X - Educational programme
O2- Post-test
Research Setting
The study will be conducted in selected schools (Government and private) in Hoshiarpur,
Punjab.
Target Population
The target population will be primary school teachers fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion
criteria from selected schools of district Hoshiarpur, Punjab.
Sample and sampling technique
80 teachers will be selected by using convenient sampling technique.
Variables
Independent variable - Educational programme
Dependent variable - Knowledge
Demographic variables - Age, experience, qualification, type of schools,
source of information.
8
Criteria for sample selection
Inclusion criteria
1. Both govt. and private primary school teachers will be included.
2. Both male and female teachers will be included.
Exclusion criteria
1. Teachers who are on deputation.
2. Teachers who are not willing to participate.
Content Validity of tool
Content validation of tool will be established by obtaining the valuable opinions and
suggestions from the field of Psychiatric (Mental Health) Nursing and experts of various
fields.
Pilot Study – Pilot study will be conducted to ensure reliability of tool and feasibility of
study on 1/10th i.e. 8 samples after the development of the tools in month of Feb, 2021.
Reliability of the tool
It will be measured by Karl Pearson’s coefficient correlation formula.
Description of interventions
Step-I: Pre Preparation
In the pre, preparation the permission will be taken from selected schools and
Sinformed consent from the participants will be obtained. The pre-test will be taken
from selected subjects.
Step-II: Plan of action
The teachers will receive educational programme regarding learning disability.
Step-III: After procedure
After 15 days of educational programme, post-test will be taken.
Data collection procedure
Data collection will be done in the month of March 2021.Written permission will be
obtained from selected schools for conduction of study. The purpose of the study will be
explained and informed consent will be taken from the study participants.
Ethical consideration
Approval will be taken from the ethical and research committee of institution.
Permission will be taken from the principles of selected schools.
Written informed consent will be taken from individual subject.
9
Confidentiality of the information will be maintained.
LIST OF REFERENCES
1. Ramaa.S. Two decades of research on learning disabilities in India. International journal
of science and research Dyslexia.2007 (6) 268-283.vol 3 issue.
10
2. Karande S. Kulkarni M. Poor school performance. Indian Journal Pediatric. International
journal of science and research 2005 Nov; 72(11):961-62.
3. Karande S. Sawant S. Kulkarni M. Galvankar P. Sholapurwala R.Comparison of
cognition abilities between groups of children with specific learning disability. Indian
Journal of Medical Sciences.2005 (3):95-103
4. Jose J. Learning disability – a growing concern for parents. International journal of
science and research. Health Action 2009 Jun; 7-8. Volume 3 Issue 7, July 2014
www.ijsr.net Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY.
5. National Association of special education Teachers. National Dissemination center for
children and youth with disabilities. Introduction to learning disability. (2014) naset.org
http://www.naset.org/.
6. National Association of special education Teachers. National Dissemination center for
children and youth with disabilities. (2014) naset.org http://www.naset.org/.
7. Julie M. David. Kannan Balakrishnan. A New Decision Tree Algorithm for Prediction of
Learning Disabilities. Journal of Engg., Taylor's University, Malaysia. (Accepted for
publication, 8(3). June 2013).
https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/7980/9/09_chapter%201.pdf.
8. Campbell J. Gilmore L. & Cuskelly M. (2003). Changing student teachers' attitudes
towards disability and inclusion. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability,
28(4), 369-379. https://www.researchgate.net/publication.
9. S.Srinath, SC Girimaji, Indian Journal Of Medical Research. http://medind.nic.in.
10. Sunil Karande, Nitin Satam. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences. Indian J Med Sci. Vol.
61, No. 12, December 2007www.indianjmedsi.org.
11. Sakhuja S. Education for all and learning disabilities in India. [Online]. 2004. (Cited
2010); Available from: URL: http://sspeonline.org/article.
12. Sandhu.P. Legislation and current provisions for specific learning Disabilities in India.
Journal of Disability studies. Vol.1,no.2.pp85-88.
13. Moothedath and Vranda (2015). Learning disabilities concept and identification: Primary
teachers' perspectives in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Social Science and
Humanity.Vol. 9, No. 1; 2019 http://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v9n1p9
14. Woo. B. S, et. al., (2007). A study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching
Programme on Knowledge Regarding Learning Disabilities Among School Teachers at
Selected Schools, Kerala. http//learning%20disability%20study%20kerla%20study.pdf.
11
15. Indira Gupta et. Al (2001). Prevalence of behavioral disorder in school children. Indian
Journal of pediatrics, 68(4), 323-326.
16. Bincymol S. Effectiveness of self instructional module on learning disabilities of school
children for school teachers in selected schools at Mangalore. PG dissertation. Rajeev
Gandhi University . 2007 (unpublished)
17. Shukla and Agarwal (2014) Williams et al. (2013). Assessing Primary School Teachers’s
Knowledge of Specific Learning Disabilities. Journal of Educational and Developmental
Psychology; Vol. 9, No. 1; 2019.Available at http://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v9n1p9.
18. Natekar (2012). Karande, Sholapurwala, and Kulkarni (2011). Assessing Primary School
Teachers’s Knowledge of Specific Learning Disabilities. Journal of Educational and
Developmental Psychology; Vol. 9, No. 1; 2019.Available at
http://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v9n1p9.
12