Presentation Meraj Electromagnetic Joining

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

ELECTROMAGNETIC JOINING

Meraj Ahmed

Industry Meet
At
NAL Bengaluru
18 Oct 2019

CSIR-Advanced Materials and Processes Research Institute


(AMPRI) Bhopal
Overview

Introduction
Process/Physics
Application
EMF/EMJ@AMPRI
 Futuristic product development @ AMPRI
Introduction: Pulsed Power

Pulsed power: Concentration of energy in very small space


and time and its sudden release

Best analogy: Reverse process of a


droplet of water falling on still liquid

Pic from; http://wordsofjoy75.blogspot.in/2013/06/breaking-silence.html, Nov 2015


High Velocity Forming
High Velocity Forming/HERF: Forming process at high strain rate of 102/s
(Velocity > 10 m/s) and above

Explosive Electromagnetic Electrohydraulic


Forming Forming (EMF) Forming (EHF)
Process

Pictures from BMAX (www.bmax.com)

Electromagnetic Joining/ Electromagnetic Forming Electrohydraulic Forming


Crimping
Capacitor is discharged
causing a time varying
current to flow through
a coil (EMF)/vaporizing wire (EHF).
Current in the coil produces a
transient magnetic field that
induces eddy currents in the workpiece (EMF). Eddy currents generate an opposing magnetic field-
causes the coil to repel the workpiece into the die.

 Current passed through an electrode pair placed in die cavity (filled with fluid) with or without
bridgewire. Shockwave generated and same is applied to the workpiece (EHF)
ADVANTAGES OF HERF PROCESSES
• High Productivity, Simple tooling (one-sided die and no punch), same tools
can be used for various thickness and materials
• Non contact method, high surface finish and less tool wear
• No lubrication, post cleaning rarely necessary
• Automation friendly and reduces springback and prevents wrinkles, Uniform
strain distribution
• Pressure transmitted through a fluid medium- advantages of hydroforming are
partially incorporated ( EHF)

Challenges in using HERF Process


• HERF processes are not suitable for large components and thick sheets
• Working with High Voltage – safety concern
• Higher capital investment for the equipment, Limited equipment suppliers
• Deformation behaviour and formability at very high strain rates is not well
understood in case of all the materials. Modelling of the processes is difficult.
Application of EMF/EMJ in Industries
• Medical (wheelchairs,
walkers, canes etc.)
• Research institute
• Nuclear • Aerospace (flight contro

• Home Appliances rods and torque tubes)


• Power • Air conditioning (valve
components)
• Automobile ( dissimilar
metal- torque tubes and
shock absorbers etc.)
Welding Crimping Forming Cutting Piercing

Source: www.magneform.com; www.pulsar.co.il, www.iap.com, https://www.pstproducts.com)


@AMPRI
Electromagnetic joining & Forming:
• Expertise on design of Coil and Field shaper (FS) for
joining of symmetric and non-symmetric geometry
• Electromagnetic Joining of Cu-SS, SS-Nb, SS-Ti, Al-Al,
Al-SS, Al-MS, Al-Cu, Cu-Cu, Al-Al

Rect. Profile
Study on design of Coil

• Effect of no. turns of coil, ID, OD, turn thickness on output


(Inductance- current.. )
• Effect of web width and material/slit geometry of FS on process
parameters
• Effect of coil configuration/design on force/deformation (using
FEA)
Effect of coil Design on the discharge current
Table- Different dimension of coil
Coil ID/OD (mm) N Turn Thickness Effect of t, ID, OD, N
C1 91/220 4.40 8

C2 91/220 4.33 8

C3 55/200 2.4 3 t, D, N L

C4 91/210 4.33 8

C5 101/210 4.33 8

256 kA
Change in  225 kA
Variation in Change in 
frequency Δf 
parameters current ΔI (kA)
(kHz)
Coil ID(91‐101) ‐9 ‐0.3
Coil OD(210‐220) 32 1.7 Effect of no. of turn
N (4.40‐ 4.33) ‐31 0.9
Design of Coil and FS

Rectangular FS Elliptical FS

Flat forming coil


Electromagnetic Joining
Sample Design:
Al-Al Joining joint design
Al-MS electromagnetic
joining
Weld
Zone
Part 1
D1 D2 Part 2 D3

Failure criteria between part


1 and weld
(i) D12-D22 > 10D3 :– Zone 1
(ii) D12 > D22 +10D2-30 :-
Zone 2
(iii) tf = [{√(D32 + 10D3)} -
D3] / 2

EDS 3 bank 1.5 SOD

Set 1

Set 2

Set 3
SS-Nb Joint SS-Ti Joint

Helium Leak proof test


Job description Leak Tightness
(mbar-l/s)
1. SS to Nb < 1E-10
2. SS to Nb < 1.2E-10
3. SS to Ti 1E-5
4. SS to Ti 1E-5

Cu-SS joining

Leak proof test carried out at RRCAT


DEVELOPMENT OF AL WAVEGUIDE AND SIMILAR PROFILE COMPONENTS
• Reduction of weight
• Better performance

Source: ISRO exhb. BVM


http://ec.europa.eu/research/transport/pdf/turin1010_0950_en.pdfwww.magnepress.com www.iap.com Courtesy: BARC, OSU, Pulsar
REFERENCES
References:
Ahmed, M., Panthi, S.K., Ramakrishnan, N., Jha, A.K., Yegneswaran, A.H., Dasgupta, R. and Ahmed, S., 2011, “Alternative flat coil design for
electromagnetic forming using FEM”, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 21(3), 618-625.
Altynova, M., Hu, X., and Daehn, G.S., 1996, “Increased ductility in high velocity electromagnetic ring expansion”, Metallurgical and Materials
Transactions A, 27A, 1837-1844.
ASTM- E8/E8M Standard, “Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials [Metric]”, ASTM International.
Ayres, R.A., Wenner, M.L., 1978, “Strain and strain-rate hardening effect on punch stretching of 5182-0 aluminium at elevated temperature”,
Sheet Metal Industries, 55,1208-1216.
Balanethiram, V.S. and Daehn, G.S., 1992, “Enhanced formability of interstitial free iron at high strain rate”, Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia ,
27(12),1783-1788.
Balanethiram, V.S., and Daehn, G.S., 1994a, “Hyperplasticity: Increased Forming Limits at High Workpiece Velocity”, Scripta Metallurgica et
Materialia , 30, 515-520.
Balanethiram, V.S., Hu, X., Altynova, M., 1994b, “Hyper plasticity: Enhance formability at High rates. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1994, 45, p
595-660.
Banabic, D., 2010, “Sheet metal forming process”, Springer.
Beerwald, C., Beerwald, M., Dirksen, U., et al., 2010, “Impulse hydroforming method for very thin sheets from metallic or hybrid Materials”, 4th
International Conference on High Speed Forming, Columbus Ohio, USA, 150-158.
Ben-Artzy, A., Stern, A., Frage, N., Shribman, V., Sadot, O., 2010, “Wave formation mechanism in magnetic pulse welding”, International Journal
of Impact Engineering, 37, 397-404.
Belyy, I.V., Fertik, S.M., and Khimenko, L.T., 1996, “Electromagnetic Metal Forming Handbook”, (A Translation of the Russian Book:
Sprvochnik Po Magnitno-impul’ Snoy Obrabotke Metallov, Kharíkov State University, Kharíkov, Russia), Translated by M. M. Altynova,
Material Science and Engineering Department, Ohio State University, Columbus.
Bruno, E.J., 1968, “High-velocity forming of metals” American Society of Tool and Manufacturing Engineers Publication.
Bonnen, J.J.F., Golovashchenko, S.F., Dawson, and Mamutov, A.V., 2013, “Electrode erosion observed in electrohydraulic dischages used in
pulsed sheet metal forming”, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 22 (12), 3946-3958.
Caggiano, A., Christiana, J., D’Aguano, P., Hoppe, F. Inmam, N., Pfanner, G., 1961-1962, Republican Aviation Corporation intern and final
progress report on “capacitor Discharge Metal Forming” Contact No. AF 33(600)42924, A.S.D. project 7-844.
Casadei, A., and Broda, R., 2007, “Impact of vehicle weight reduction on fuel economy for various vehicle architectures”, (Arlington, VA: The
Aluminum Association, Inc.), http://www.drivealuminum.org/research-resources/PDF /Research /2008/2008-Ricardo-Study.pdf, accessed on 2
June 2016).
Chace, W.G., Moore, H.K., 1959, “Exploding Wires”, Vol. 1. Plenum Press, New York, 9.
Chu, Y-Y and Lee, R S, 2010, “Effects of blank design on the electromagnetic flanging process”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical
Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 224, 75-86.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy