CHAPTER 2 (Arts. 1163-1178)
CHAPTER 2 (Arts. 1163-1178)
CHAPTER 2 (Arts. 1163-1178)
CHAPTER 2
NATURE AND EFFECT OF OBLIGATIONS
(Arts. 1163-1178)
STUDY GUIDE :
« Distinguish: Specific/Determinate vs. Generic/Indeterminate Thing
The delivery must be personal (made by the debtor himself), exclusive (made to
the creditor only) and timely (without delay).
4
CHAPTER 2 – Nature & Effect of Obligations (Articles 1163-1178)
Remedies of the creditor in case of the debtor’s failure to perform his obligation :
(a) specific performance (if compliance is still possible) + damages; OR
(b) damages only (where it is the only possible remedy).
5
CHAPTER 2 – Nature & Effect of Obligations (Articles 1163-1178)
1. The forbidden act shall be undone at the debtor’s expense. (Art. 1168)
2. REMEMBER : Non-fulfillment may take place BUT specific performance is NOT a
remedy for the debtor fulfils by not doing what has been forbidden him. Hence,
also, there can be NO delay in a negative personal obligation.
¤ E. DELAY ¤
1. Distinguish:
(a) Ordinary Delay
(b) Legal Delay → requires extrajudicial/judicial demand (Art. 1169, par. 1)
3. Kinds of Default :
(a) Mora Solvendi (Art. 1169, par. 1) → delay on the part of the debtor
(b) Mora Accipiendi → delay on the part of the creditor
(c) Compensatio Morae (Art. 1169, par. 3) → delay of obligors in reciprocal
obligations
6
CHAPTER 2 – Nature & Effect of Obligations (Articles 1163-1178)
2. NEGLIGENCE (culpa)
(a) Defined (Art. 1173, par. 1)
(b) Distinguish: fraud vs. negligence
(c) Validity of waiver of action for future negligence :
(c.1.) simple negligence – valid
(c.2.) gross negligence (amounting to fraud) - VOID
(d) Kinds of negligence
(d.1.) contractual (culpa contractual)
7
CHAPTER 2 – Nature & Effect of Obligations (Articles 1163-1178)
1. Defined.
(a) General rule: A person is NOT responsible for loss or damage caused to
another resulting from fortuitous events. In such a case, his obligation is
extinguished. (Art. 1174)
(b) Exceptions (positive liability even with a fortuitous event) : (Art. 1174)
8
CHAPTER 2 – Nature & Effect of Obligations (Articles 1163-1178)
(b.3.) When the nature of the obligation requires the assumption of risk.
(b.4.) When the thing to be delivered is generic
(“genus never perishes” - Art. 1263)
¤ H. ARTICLE 1175 ¤
1. Usury is now legally non-existent. The parties are now free to stipulate any amount
of interest.
2. Art. 1956, however, of the Civil Code states: “No interest shall be due unless it has
been expressly stipulated in writing.”
¤ I. ARTICLE 1176 ¤
¤ K. TRANSMISSIBILITY OF RIGHTS
ARTICLE 1178 ¤
9
CHAPTER 2 – Nature & Effect of Obligations (Articles 1163-1178)
2. Exceptions :
(2.1.) when prohibited by law
(2.2.) when prohibited by stipulation
(2.3.) in purely personal obligations
ART. 2179. When the plaintiff’s own negligence was the immediate and
proximate cause of his injury, he cannot recover damages. But if his negligence was
only contributory, the immediate and proximate cause of the injury being the defendant’s
lack of due care, the plaintiff may recover damages, but the courts shall mitigate the
damages to be awarded.
ART. 2201. In contracts and quasi-contracts, the damages for which the
obligor who acted in good faith is liable shall be those that are the natural and probable
consequences of the breach of the obligation, and which the parties have foreseen or
could have reasonably foreseen at the time the obligation was constituted.
In case of fraud, bad faith, malice or wanton attitude, the obligor shall be
responsible for all damages which may be reasonably attributed to the non-performance
of the obligation.
ART. 2209. If the obligation consists in the payment of a sum of money, and
the debtor incurs in delay, the indemnity for damages, there being no stipulation to the
contrary, shall be the payment of the interest agreed upon, and in the absence of
stipulation, the legal interest, which is six per cent per annum.
APPLICATION/PROBLEMS :
1. Liza is the owner of a 200 square-meter lot sited in Makati. On January 15,
2013, Lito and Liza entered into a lease contract covering the said lot. The term of the
lease was 2 years, or until January 14, 2015, and the monthly rental agreed upon by the
parties was P50,000. On June 15, 2013, Liza sold her Makati lot to Rene and promised
to deliver the lot to Rene on November 15, 2013. On November 15, 2013, however, Liza
failed to deliver the lot and instead made delivery only on December 15, 2013. As the
new owner, Rene now claims from Liza Lito’s rental payments starting June 15, 2013. Is
Rene’s demand well-founded?
à Clue question: When does the obligation to deliver arise? (Art. 1164)
10
CHAPTER 2 – Nature & Effect of Obligations (Articles 1163-1178)
3. On March 15, 2013, Engr. Fabi entered into a building contract with Mr. Oni. It
was agreed that in six months, Engr. Fabi will finish the construction of a one-kilometer
dam in Bacolor, Pampanga to protect the property of Mr. Oni from damage caused by the
lahar mud flow consequent of the Mount Pinatubo eruption. It was also stipulated that
the height of the dam from the basement shall be four meters, and crushed stone
measuring two inches in diameter shall be used. Later, Mr. Oni found out that Engr. Fabi
used 1/2-inch diameter of crushed stone for the dam. What are the remedies of Mr. Oni?
à Clue: Creditor’s right in a positive personal obligation (Art. 1167)
4. Budoy and Intoy are the owners of two adjoining pieces of land in Allen,
Samar. On April 10, 2012, Budoy and Intoy entered into an agreement. In the
agreement, Intoy obliged himself not to construct any structure, whether temporary or
permanent, on his (Intoy’s) land for five years because Budoy will use it as his garage for
five years. As consideration for the promise, Budoy paid Intoy the amount of P200,000.
On March 20, 2013, however, Intoy constructed a semi- structure to accommodate five
live-in employees from his carinderia. What is the liability of Intoy?
à Clue: Creditor’s right in a negative personal obligation (Art. 1168)
5. On October 2, 2012, Hiss agreed to sell his original set of Harry Potter DVD’s
to Moo, and promised to deliver the same to Moo’s house on October 3, 2012. On
October 8, Moo demanded from Hiss delivery of the DVD’s. Hiss, however, informed
Moo that on the night of October 6, 2012 a burglar entered their house and robbed them
of personal effects amounting to P200,000 which were never recovered. Hiss’ original
set of Harry Potter DVD’s were among the things stolen.
(a) What is the liability of Hiss?
(b) If, on October 3, 2012, Moo had asked his brother-lawyer to write a demand letter
addressed to Hiss insisting on the delivery of the DVD set, would your answer to the
preceding question be the same?
à Clue: Correlate Art. 1165, par. 3 with Art. 1169, par. 1.
11
CHAPTER 2 – Nature & Effect of Obligations (Articles 1163-1178)
6. John and Bea were engaged to be married on June 6, 2013. For the wedding
cake, they contracted Goldi-Cooks to bake a five-layered chocolate cake with walnut,
which was Bea’s favourite. On the day of the wedding, and up to the time when the
newly weds were about to share their first slice of cake as husband and wife, no cake
arrived. So, they had to make do with the leche flan the caterer had prepared for the
wedding. When John and Bea arrived from their honeymoon, they filed an action for
damages against Goldi-Cooks who now denies liability on the ground that the spouses
never made any demand on Goldi-Cooks for the delivery of the wedding cake. Decide.
à Clue: Art. 1169, par. 2.
7. On January 31, 2007, Brad advanced P100,000 from Angie and promised to
pay the amount on January 31, 2008 at 10% per annum interest. In case of default, Brad
also obliged himself to pay to Angie additional interest (as penalty for the delay)
computed at 5% per month. On January 31, 2008, Brad failed to pay Angie his loan. For
the next six months, Angie did not hear anything from Brad. On June 30, 2008, Angie
filed a case in court to recover the amount of the loan. Assuming that you were the
lawyer hired by Angie, when will you start computing the penalty interest of 5%/month on
the matured loan of Brad? Explain. à Clue: Art. 1169, par. 1.
8. Dean is a businessman engaged in the buy and sell of second hand cars. He
owns a 500 square-meter lot in Manila valued at P5M and a Mercedez Benz car worth
P1.5M. On January 1, 2011, Dean’s best friend Techie bought a 2002 Nissan Patrol car
from Dean for P1M. Dean agreed to extend payment of the car to December 15, 2011.
In the early part of 2012, due to financial reverses, Dean was able to borrow money from
a wealthy friend, James, who loaned him the amount of P10M without interest and
payable on October 31, 2012. As of November 10, 2012, however, Dean, despite
repeated demands from James since the obligation became due, has not been able to
settle his obligation. Worst, James came to know from another business associate that,
as of October 5, 2012, Dean had already sold his P5M Manila property which was under
renovation under the supervision of its new owner Gaby. What, under the factual
circumstances of this case, are the successive rights of James? à Clue: Art. 1177.
9. On July 31, 2012, Procopio sold to Cordapio his Nikon D700 camera for
P100,000. Upon delivery of the camera on the same day, Cordapio paid P20,000 as
downpayment. Procopio agreed to accept payment on the balance in instalments, as
follows :
September 30, 2012 - P10,000
November 30, 2012 - P15,000
January 31, 2013 - P15,000
March 31, 2013 - P20,000
May 30, 2013 - P20,000
12
CHAPTER 2 – Nature & Effect of Obligations (Articles 1163-1178)
It was also agreed by the parties that if any instalment was not paid by
Cordapio on time, the remainder of the unpaid instalments would automatically become
due and demandable. On January 31, 2013, Cordapio did not remit the instalment thus
due to Procopio. Until the end of March, 2013, Procopio did not hear from Cordapio. So,
on April 15, 2013, Procopio filed an action for collection against Cordapio demanding
payment of the entire balance due from January 31, 2013 in the amount of P55,000.
From what time should interest for damages start to be computed?
Clue: Art. 1169, par. 1. (See Note No. 6 on DELAY)
10. At around 10:00 in the evening, you are driving along Roxas Boulevard within
the area of Buendia. Your family is in the car with you. The highway is normally free
from pedestrians who are required by local ordinances to cross the boulevard using the
designated overpass. Suddenly, from out of nowhere, a man in his mid-30’s crosses the
road. The man was wearing a black shirt which made him even more invisible to moving
vehicles. Before you realize it, he was already right in front of the car a few feet away,
and it became impossible to steer clear of the man after a rapid full step on the brakes.
As a result, the man suffered serious injuries. What is your liability? Can the man
recover damages?
à Clue: Art. 2179. (See Note 2[e], Grounds for Damages)
13