Iron Oxide Data
Iron Oxide Data
Iron Oxide Data
Analyses of all samples were carried out by flame atomic After repeated injections for 10days, the
absorptionspectrometry accumulation of iron on organs studied is slight, indicating that
iron is eliminated fast at 100mg/kg given subcutaneously in mice.
In the single-dose toxicity study, the mice were were
given a single subcutaneous (SC) injection of SPIO at At histopathology, no iron-positive pigment was observed in
100mg/kg. All animals were examined for mortality and macrophages of multiple organs (mainly heart, liver, spleen, lung,
clinical signs once per 2 hours.All of the animals were kidney, brain).
sacrificed 24 hours after injection and received a
complete necropsy. The iron contained in heart, spleen,
liver, lung, kidney, brain was evaluated with AAS after
Pretreatment
4 In the present study the effect of iron oxide magnetic In animals given Fe3O4-PVP-POES-Doxo and treated with
nanoparticles (Fe3O4 nanoparticles with PVP coating) magnet, there was a visible reduction of tumor growth, during the
complexed with Doxorubicin (Doxo) in DLA cells and treatment period and there was no reappearance of tumour in this
murine solid tumour was evaluated. The antitumour effect group after the treatment duration, whereas animals treated with
of the complex with an externally applied magnetic field Doxo, Fe3O4-PVP-POES, Fe3O4-PVP-POES-Doxo without
to target the complex to the tumour site after oral magnet exposure showed a comparable reduction in tumour
administration was also studied. growth during the treatment period but later the tumor showed a
logarithmic growth.
Fe3O4-PVP nanoparticles were coated with poly oxy
ethylene 25 propylene glycol stearate (POES) and then Fe3 O4 - PVP POES- Doxorubicin complex showed more
complexed with doxorubicin to obtain Fe3O4-PVP-POES- cytotoxicity on DLA cells compared to Fe3 O4 - PVP or
Doxo nanoparticles. Doxorubicin alone. Treatment of DLA cells with the nanoparticle-
doxorubicin complex resulted in higher apoptotic index than that
Male Swiss albino mice bearing transplanted DLA solid of treatment with doxorubicin or nanoparticles alone.
tumor on hind legs were administered with the drug and
nanoparticle complex, orally and treated with a magnet on In the heart tissue of tumour bearing mice treated with Fe3 O4 -
the tumour for 15 min for 7 days. The hind leg PVP-POES- Doxorubicin without magnetic field application there
thicknesses were measured using a vernier caliper once in was decrease in levels of GSH and increase in the levels peroxides
three days and the tumor volume was calculated. of lipids ( monitored as TBARS) due to the oxidative stress
induced by the drug in heart tissue while in the animals subjected
to the applicatiotion of magnetic field following Fe3 O4 - PVP-
POES-Doxorubicin treatment the levels were similar to the control
animals suggesting alleviation of cardiotoxicity due to magnetic
targeting.
5 Two types of Iron Oxide, Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3, The internalization and uptake of IO nanoparticle more in the cell
were encapsulated with Chitosan by polymerizing IO incubated with magnetic field.
associated methacrylic acid monomer (MAA) in
the presence of CS at [NH2]/[COOH] molar ratios of 0.2. Viability of the cells more in the cells incubated with the Magnetic
field which doesn’t cause any morphological changes in the cells.
The internalization, iron uptake, and cytotoxicity were
investigated systematically in order to explore their The chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles can facilitate adhesion
potential bioapplications. Kusa O cells, mesenchymal to the membrane of Kusa O stem cells and the cellular uptake of
stem cell lines, was used for this study. IO-entrapped CS nanoparticles was enhanced under magnetization
Prior to the internalization experiment, the with no morphology change and no toxic effect.
nanoparticles were labeled with fluorescein
isothiocyanate (FITC). Then the cells were cultured and
treated with the nanoparticle(0.005mg) and cells then
incubated at 37 oC for 3 h in the presence and absence of
a magnetic field.The cellular entry of FITC-labeled
particles was monitored by confocal laser scanning
microscopy.
6 The aim of this study was to investigate and compare The results showed that there was a high variation among different
different nanoparticles and nanotubes regarding nanoparticles concerning their ability to cause toxic effects. CuO
cytotoxicity and ability to cause DNA damage and nanoparticles were most potent regarding cytotoxicity and DNA
oxidative stress. The study was focused on different metal damage. The toxicity was likely not explained by Cu ions released
oxide particles (CuO, TiO2, ZnO, CuZnFe2O4, Fe3O4, to the cell medium. These particles also caused oxidative lesions
Fe2O3), and the toxicity was compared to that of carbon and were the only particles that induced an almost significant
nanoparticles and multiwalled carbon nanotubes increase (p = 0.058) in intracellular ROS.
(MWCNT). The human lung epithelial cell line A549 was
exposed to the particles, and cytotoxicity was analyzed For iron oxide particles (Fe3O4, Fe2O3), no or low toxicity was
using trypan blue staining. DNA damage and oxidative observed,
lesions were determined using the comet assay, and
intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) ZnO showed effects on cell viability as well as DNA damage,
was measured using the oxidation-sensitive fluoroprobe whereas the TiO2 particles only caused DNA damage.
2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA).
The carbon nanotubes showed cytotoxic effects and caused DNA
damage in the lowest dose tested.
7
Reference :
Tapan K. Jain, Maram K. Reddy, Marco A. Morales, Diandra L. Leslie-Pelecky and Vinod Labhasetwar, Biodistribution, Clearance,
and Biocompatibility of Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles in Rats, Mol. Pharmaceutics, 2008, 5 (2), pp 316–327
2) Morteza Mahmoudia,, Abdolreza Simchia,b, Mohammad Imanic, Mohammad A. Shokrgozard,,Abbas S. Milanie, Urs
O. Häfelif, Pieter Stroeveg, A new approach for the in vitro identification of the cytotoxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide
nanoparticles, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 75 (2010) 300–309
3) Shiyuan Liu, Yu Han, Longping Yin, Ling Long and Rui Liu, Toxicology Studies of a Superparamagnetic iron oxide
nanoparticle in vivo, Advanced Materials Research Vols. 47-50 (2008) pp 1097-1100.
4) Cherupally Krishnan Nair and Dhanya Chandrasekharan, Targeted tumor therapy with doxorubicin bound to iron oxide
nanoparticles and alleviation of drug toxicity, cancer Prevention Research 1 (Meeting Abstract Supplement), B111, November
1, 2008
6) Hanna L. Karlsson, Pontus Cronholm, Johanna Gustafsson and Lennart M ller, Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Are Highly Toxic:
A Comparison between Metal Oxide Nanoparticles and Carbon Nanotubes, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2008, 21 (9), pp 1726–1732