Saso Ieee C57 2018 e PDF
Saso Ieee C57 2018 e PDF
Saso Ieee C57 2018 e PDF
IEEE C 57:2013
ICS 17.220
Saudi Standards, Metrology and Quality Org (SASO)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saudi Standards, Metrology and Quality Organization (SASO) has adopted the international
standard IEEE Std C 57:2013 “IEEE Standard Requirements for Instrument Transformers”
issued by (The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.) which has been
translated into Arabic. This standard has been approved as a Saudi Standard without any
technical modifications.
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Contents
1. Overview ............................................................................................................................. ......................3
1.1 Scope ............................................................................................................................. .....................3
1.2 Purpose ............................................................................................. ..................................................3
2. Normative references............................................................................................................................. ....3
3. Definitions ................................................................................................................................................. 4
4. General requirements...................................................................................................................... ...........4
4.1 Service conditions............................................................................................................................. ..4
4.2 Effect of air density on flashover voltage ...........................................................................................6
4.3 Frequency ............................................................................................................................. ..............6
4.4 Effect of altitude on temperature rise and effect of ambient temperature on permissible loading......6
4.5 Basic impulse insulation levels, dielectric tests, and outdoor instrument transformer creepage
distance and wet test .................................................................................................................................7
4.6 Temperature rise ............................................................................................................................. ....10
4.7 Capacitance and dissipation factor requirements................................................................................11
4.8 Classification of tests .......................................................................................................................... 12
4.9 Construction ............................................................................................................................. ..........14
5. Accuracy classes for metering .................................................................................... ...............................17
5.1 Basis for accuracy classes................................................................................................................... 17
5.2 Expression of transformer correction factor at 0.6 power factor (lagging) of metered load ...............17
5.3 Standard accuracy classes ................................................................................................................... 18
5.4 Limiting values of ratio correction factor and phase angle for standard accuracy classes..................18
6. Current transformers............................................................................................................................. .....20
6.1 Terms in which ratings shall be expressed .........................................................................................20
6.2 Standard burdens ............................................................................................................................. ...21
6.3 Accuracy ratings for metering ............................................................................................................ 21
6.4 Accuracy ratings for relaying .................................................................................................... .........23
6.5 Continuous thermal current rating factors based on 30 °C average ambient air temperature .............25
6.6 Short-time current ratings ........................................................................................................ ...........25
6.7 Secondary winding-induced voltages ................................................................................................. 25
6.8 Nameplates ........................................................................................ .................................................26
6.9 Terminals ............................................................................................................................. ...............26
6.10 Application data................................................................................................................................ 27
6.11 Routine accuracy tests ...................................................................................................................... 27
7. Voltage transformers ............................................................................................................................. ....29
7.1 Terms in which ratings shall be expressed .........................................................................................30
7.2 Standard burdens ............................................................................................................................. ...30
7.3 Accuracy ratings .................................................................................................................................35
7.4 Thermal burden ratings ....................................................................................................................... 36
7.5 Nameplates .................................................................................................................................... .....36
7.6 Terminals ............................................................................................................. ...............................36
7.7 Short-circuit capability ....................................................................................................................... 37
7.8 Application data..................................................................................................................................37
7.9 Induced voltage test ............................................................................................................................ 37
7.10 Routine accuracy tests ...................................................................................................................... 37
8. Test procedures applicable to instrument transformers .............................................................................37
8.1 Ratio and phase angle measurement and calculations ........................................................................38
8.2 Impedance, excitation, and composite error measurements................................................................38
8.3 Polarity ............................................................................................................................. ..................39
8.4 Resistance measurements ...................................................................................................................42
8.5 Dielectric tests ............................................................................................................................. .......43
8.6 Partial discharge measurement ........................................................................................................... 44
9. Test procedures applicable to current transformers ...................................................................................46
9.1 Ratio and phase angle measurement and calculations ........................................................................49
9.2 Demagnetization ......................................................................................................................... ........49
9.3 Impedance measurements ................................................................................................................... 52
9.4 Polarity ...............................................................................................................................................53
10. Test procedures applicable to voltage transformers.................................................................................54
10.1 Ratio and phase angle measurement and calculations ......................................................................54
1
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
2
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Instrument Transformers
IMPORTANT NOTICE: IEEE Standards documents are not intended to ensure safety, security, health,
or environmental protection, or ensure against interference with or from other devices or networks.
Implementers of IEEE Standards documents are responsible for determining and complying with all
appropriate safety, security, environmental, health, and interference protection practices and all
applicable laws and regulations.
This IEEE document is made available for use subject to important notices and legal disclaimers.
These notices and disclaimers appear in all publications containing this document and may
be found under the heading “Important Notice” or “Important Notices and Disclaimers
Concerning IEEE Documents.” They can also be obtained on request from IEEE or viewed at
http://standards.ieee.org/IPR/disclaimers.html.
1. Overview
1.1 Scope
This standard is intended for use as a basis for performance and interchangeability of equipment covered,
and to assist in the proper selection of such equipment. Safety precautions are also addressed.
This standard covers certain electrical, dimensional, and mechanical characteristics, and takes into
consideration certain safety features of current and inductively coupled voltage transformers of types
generally used in the measurement of electricity and the control.
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this standard is to provide the performance requirements for electrical system and test
interchangeability of current and inductively coupled voltage transformers. These transformers are for both
indoor and outdoor application.
This standard covers the requirements for Class 1 instrument transformers. For instrument transformers of a
nominal system voltage of 115 kV and above if Class 2 is required refer to IEEE Std C57.13.5™. 1
2. Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document (i.e., they must
be understood and used, so each referenced document is cited in text and its relationship to this document is
explained). For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of
the referenced document (including any amendments or corrigenda) applies.
1
Information on references can be found in Clause 2.
2
IEC publications are available from the International Electrotechnical Commission (http://www.iec.ch/). IEC publications are also available in
the United States from the American National Standards Institute (http://www.ansi.org/).
3
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
,
IEEE Std 4™, IEEE Standard for High-Voltage Testing Techniques. 3 4
IEEE Std 693™, IEEE Recommended Practice for Seismic Design of Substations.
IEEE Std C37.04™, IEEE Standard Rating Structure for AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers.
IEEE Std C37.09™, IEEE Standard Test Procedure for AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers Rated on a
Symmetrical Basis.
IEEE Std C57.12.00™, IEEE Standard General Requirements for Liquid-Immersed Distribution, Power,
and Regulating Transformers.
IEEE Std C57.12.90™, IEEE Standard Test Code for Liquid-Immersed Distribution, Power, and
Regulating Transformers.
IEEE Std C57.13.5™, IEEE Standard of Performance and Test Requirements for Instrument Transformers
of a Nominal System Voltage of 115 kV and Above.
IEEE Std C57.19.00™, IEEE Standard General Requirements and Test Procedure for Power Apparatus Bushings.
3. Definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply. The IEEE Standards Dictionary
Online should be consulted for terms not defined in this clause. 5
class 1 instrument transformer: An instrument transformer that is constructed and tested in accordance
with this standard.
class 2 instrument transformer: An instrument transformer that is constructed and tested in accordance
with IEEE Std C57.13.5™.
gapped core: A core where the magnetic core has an intentional gap filled with non-magnetic material.
indoor voltage transformer: One that, because of its construction, shall be protected from the weather.
prescribed extinction voltage: The minimum voltage at which the reference partial discharge intensity
shall be met when the voltage applied to the transformer is gradually decreased without interruption from
the power frequency withstand voltage or pre-stress voltage value during the partial discharge test.
partial discharge inception voltage: The lowest voltage at which partial discharges exceeding a specified
level are observed under specified conditions when the voltage applied to the test object is gradually
increased from a lower value.
4. General requirements
3
IEEE publications are available from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
(http://standards/ieee.org/).
4
The IEEE standards or products referred to in this clause are trademarks of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,
Inc.
5
IEEE Standards Dictionary Online subscription is available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/dictionary.jsp.
4
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Instrument transformers conforming to this standard shall be suitable for operation at their thermal ratings,
provided that the altitude does not exceed 1000 m.
The minimum ambient air temperature is –30 °C for outdoor applications and –5 °C for indoor
applications.
If the transformers are air cooled, the ambient temperature of the cooling air does not exceed 40 °C and the
average ambient temperature of the cooling air for any 24-hour period does not exceed 30 °C. 6
Instrument transformers may also be given ratings for operation in 55 °C average ambient temperature,
with maximum ambient air temperature not exceeding 65 °C.
Instrument transformers may be applied at higher altitudes or higher ambient temperatures than specified in
4.1.1, but the performance may be affected and special consideration should be given to these applications
(see 4.2 and 4.4).
7
NOTE—For applications involving bushing-type current transformers, see Annex B.
Where conditions other than those discussed in 4.1.1 or 4.1.2 exist, they should be brought to the attention
of those responsible for the design and application of instrument transformers. Examples of these
conditions are as follows:
a) Damaging fumes or vapors, excessive or abrasive dust, explosive mixtures of dust or gases, steam,
salt spray, excessive moisture or dripping water, etc.
f) Unusual duty, frequency of operation, difficulty of maintenance, poor wave form, unbalanced
voltage, special insulation requirements, etc.
6
It is recommended that the average temperature of the cooling air be calculated by averaging 24 consecutive hourly readings. When the outdoor air is the cooling
medium, the average of the maximum and minimum daily temperature may be used. The value that is obtained in this manner is usually higher than the true daily
average by not more than 1/2 °C.
7
Notes in text, tables, and figures of a standard are given for information only and do not contain requirements needed to implement this standard.
5
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
l) Seismic conditions: For seismic qualification methods refer to IEEE Std 693.
The effect of decreased air density is to decrease the flashover voltage for a given flashover distance. See
IEEE Std 4 for use of a correction factor.
The dielectric strength of air decreases as altitude increases. Dielectric strength that depends on air should
be multiplied by the proper altitude correction factor to obtain the dielectric strength at the required altitude
(see Table 1). For an altitude exceeding 3000 m, caution should be exercised.
Table 1 —Dielectric strength correction factors for altitudes greater than 1000 m
0.98 1200
0.95 1500
0.92 1800
0.89 2100
0.86 2400
0.83 2700
0.80 3000
0.75 3600
0.70 4200
0.67 4500a
a
An altitude of 4500 m is considered a maximum for instrument
transformers conforming to this standard.
4.3 Frequency
Instrument transformers shall be designed and rated for operation at a frequency of 60 Hz.
4.4.1 Loading of current transformers at less than rated current at high altitudes
Current transformers may be operated at altitudes greater than 1000 m without exceeding established
temperature limits provided the current is reduced below rated (or below rated times continuous thermal
current rating factor) by 0.3% for each 100 m that the altitude exceeds 1000 m.
Current transformers designed for 55 °C temperature rise above 30 °C average ambient air temperature
may be loaded in accordance with the curves shown in Figure 1 for any given average cooling air
6
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
temperature and continuous thermal current rating factor. The percent of rated primary current that can be
carried continuously without causing established temperature limits to be exceeded is given by the curves.
For example, a transformer with a continuous thermal current rating factor (RF) of 2.0 at 30 °C ambient
temperature can be used at approximately 150% of rated current at an ambient temperature of 55 °C.
Refer to Annex B for use of bushing-type current transformers in ambient temperatures of 90 °C in hot oil.
For safety reasons, voltage transformers can be operated at higher altitudes or higher ambient temperatures
only after consultation with the manufacturer, because a large percentage of the temperature rise may be
due to iron loss, which varies widely with design.
4.5 Basic impulse insulation levels, dielectric tests, and outdoor instrument
transformer creepage distance and wet test
An instrument transformer shall be assigned a basic impulse insulation level (BIL) to indicate the factory
dielectric tests that the transformer is capable of withstanding.
With the following exceptions, basic impulse insulation voltages, applied voltage test voltages for primary
winding insulation, and creepage distances and wet tests for outdoor instrument transformers are listed in
Table 2 and Table 3:
a) Applied voltage tests for primary winding insulation are not required on grounded-neutral-terminal-
type voltage transformers.
b) For insulated-neutral-terminal-type voltage transformers, the applied voltage test for primary
winding insulation shall be 19 kV on outdoor types with BILs greater than 110 kV. On indoor
types, and on outdoor types with BILs of 110 kV or less, the test voltage shall be 10 kV.
d) The applied voltage test for secondary winding insulation and between multiple secondary
windings shall be 2.5 kV.
e) The applied voltage test for autotransformers for use in the secondary circuits of instrument
transformers shall be 2.5 kV.
f) The applied voltage test for the primary insulation of auxiliary instrument transformers (for use in
the secondary circuits of instrument transformers) shall be 2.5 kV.
7
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
NOTE 1—Average ambient cooling air temperature for 24-hour period degrees Celsius (maximum
ambient air temperature does not exceed average by more than 10 ºC).
NOTE 2—These curves are based on the assumption that average winding temperature rise is proportional
to current squared.
Figure 1 —55 ºC rise current transformer basic loading characteristics (in air)
8
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
6
d 10 — 36 30 1.20 1.2
13
d 15 — 54 45 2.75 2.4
20
d 19 — 69 60 5.60 5.0
24 d 26 — 88 75 9.52 8.7
30d 34 — 110 95
34 d 34 — 130 110
15.5 15
36 d 40 — 145 125
50 50 — 175 150
25.5 25
70 70 — 230 200 36.5 34.5
95 95 — 290 250 48.3 46
140 140 — 400 350 72.5 69
185 185 — 520 450
230 230 — 630 550
123 115
275 275 — 750 650 145 138
315 325 — 865 750 170 161
350 395 — 1035 900
445 460 — 1210 1050
245 230
— 510 950 1350 1175
— 575 975 1500 1300
362 345
— 680 1175 1785 1550
— 830 1300 2070 1800
550 500
— 975 1550 2420 2100 800 765
a See 8.5.2 for User tests.
bThe selection of the lower BIL for a given nominal voltage, or for a marked ratio in Figure 14,
Table 15, Figure 16, Table 17, and Figure 18 also reduces other equirements as tabulated above. The
acceptability of these reduced requirements should be evaluated for a specific instrument
transformer design and application.
c For test procedures, see IEEE Std C57.19.00.
d These values are requirements for distribution transformer bushings that are in IEEE Std
C57.12.00.
e For current transformers with no primary insulation, such as bushing-type, there are no BIL,
chopped or applied voltage requirements.
f The minimum time to chopping shall be 3 s.
9
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
55 C ambient 30 C ambient
(C)
40 30 65 55c 55 C rise
10
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
55 40 80 65c 65 C rise
85 55 110 80 80 C rise dry-type
a Temperature rise of current transformers that are a part of high voltage power circuit breakers or
power transformers shall be in accord with IEEE Std C37.04 or IEEE Std C57.12.00, respectively (refer
also to Annex B for BCTs).
b Temperature rise of other metallic parts shall not exceed these values.
c Temperature rise at the top of the oil in sealed transformers shall not exceed these values.
Terminals for use in air shall be designed so that their maximum operating temperature
when tested with their ratings do not exceed the values provided in Table 5.
Maximum operating
temperature
115 105 90
Maximum operating
temperature for use
in metal enclosed
switchgear a
105 105 70
a
Refer to IEEE Std C37.20.1, IEEE Std C37.20.2 and IEEE Std C37.20.3.
The capacitance and dissipation factor of the transformer shall be measured at power
frequency at the following test voltages:
- 10 kV
11
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
The test shall be performed before and after the dielectric tests. The increase of
capacitance measured after compared with that measured before the dielectric tests shall
be less than the value produced by the breakdown of one capacitive element.
1) The dissipation factor shall be 0.5% maximum at a reference ambient temperature of 20°C.
2) The absolute increase of the dissipation factor value measured after compared
with the value measured before the dielectric tests shall be less than 0.1%.
2) The absolute increase of the dissipation factor value measured after compared
with the value measured before the dielectric tests shall be less than 0.03%.
c) For transformers with a rated voltage less than 10 kV, for dry type molded
transformers without capacitive graded insulation or for bushing current
transformers these capacitance and dissipation factor requirements do not apply.
These are the routine, type, and other tests that are necessary to assure that the design and
construction of the transformer are adequate to meet the specified requirements. The
method of making tests shall be as described in Clause 8 through Clause 13, or by
equivalent alternative methods. Many references are available as sources for the material
in the preceding clauses. Those references referred to specifically are listed by number in
Annex A. Other references, which may be of general utility to the user of these clauses, or
of the complete standard, are also included in Annex A. Routine and type tests are in Table
6.
Test requirements for current transformers and voltage transformers are summarized in Table 6.
Measurement or
test
Voltage transformers Current transformers
Test Test
classification classification
Reference subclause Reference subclause
12
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Capacitance and
dissipation factor
Rd 4.7 d
4.7
R
R/T 8.6 R and 11.4 T R/T 8.6 R and 11.4 T Partial discharge
— a 12.3 Inter-turn
overvoltage
T
R – Routine test
T – Type test (design test)
a May be used as routine test in lieu of induced test when secondary voltage exceeds 1200 V. b May be used as
routine test for verifying compliance to meet relaying class at rated current. c Required for relay class CTs. This is
not required for metering only CTs.
d Required for oil-filled and gas-filled instrument transformers.
13
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
These tests are to be performed subject to agreement between the producer and the user. Procedures
for the following tests can be found in IEEE Std C57.13.5:
Other tests are additional tests made for application information, for provision of specific data
requested by users, for verification of type capability, and so on. Examples of other tests are, but
not limited to the following:
d) Thermal-cycle tests
e) Seismic evaluations/tests
f) Mechanical loading
4.9 Construction
The relative instantaneous polarity of terminals or leads shall be clearly indicated by permanent
markings that cannot easily be obliterated.
When the polarity is indicated by letters, the letter “H” shall be used to distinguish the leads or
terminals connected to the primary winding and the letter “X” (also “Y” and “Z,” etc., if multiple
secondary windings are provided) shall be used to distinguish the leads or terminals connected to the
secondary winding. In addition, each lead shall be numbered, for example, H1, H2, X1, and X2. If
more than three secondary windings are provided, they shall be identified as X, Y, Z, and W for four
secondary windings; X, Y, Z, W, and V for five secondary windings; X, Y, Z, W, V, and U for six
secondary windings, and so on. H1 and X1 (also Y1 and Z1, etc., if provided) shall be of the same
polarity.
When multiple primary windings are provided, the leads or terminals shall be designated by the
letter “H” together with consecutive pairs of numbers (H1, H2, H3, H4, etc.). The odd-numbered
leads or terminals shall be of the same polarity.
When taps or leads are provided on the secondary winding(s), the leads or terminals shall be lettered
as required above and numbered X1, X2, X3, etc., or Y1, Y2, Y3, etc., with the lowest and highest
numbers indicating the full winding and the intermediate numbers indicating the taps in their
14
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
relative order. When X1 is not in use, the lower number of the two leads in use shall be the polarity
lead. In the case of dual primary ratios that are obtained by secondary taps, the X3 or Y3 terminal
shall be common to both taps.
For 72 kV class instrument transformers and above a ground shield shall be provided between the
primary and secondary windings.
4.9.3 Symbols
15
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Ampere ratings of separate primary windings on one Voltage ratings or ratios of separate &
core (When all primary current ratings are the same, the secondary windings on one core
transformer shall produce rated secondary current when (ampersand)
each primary winding carries rated current and the Example: Voltage transformer for
primary currents are in phase. When all primary currents connection line-to-ground, with one
are not the same, the transformer shall produce rated primary winding and two secondary
secondary current when the primary current is rated windings
current in only one primary winding.) 14 400:120 & 72 V
a) Transformer with two or more primary windings Ratio 120:1 & 200:1
designed to be used individually
Example: Current transformer with two primary
windings
Current ratio
100 & 600:5 A
b) Totalizing transformer with two or more primary
windings that can be used simultaneously and connected
in different circuits
Example: Totalizing current transformer with three
primary windings
Current ratio
5 & 5 & 5:5 A
c) Transformer for three-wire single-phase circuit with
two separate primary windings
Example: Current transformer for three-wire single-
phase
Current ratio
100 & 100:5 A
Different primary current ratings obtained by taps in Two or more primary or secondary /
the secondary winding voltage ratings obtained by taps in the
secondary winding. (single slant
Example: Current transformer with taps in the
line)
secondary winding for additional ratios Example: Voltage transformer with
Current ratio taps in the secondary winding for
300/400/600:5 A additional primary voltage ratings
8 400/12 000/14 400 V
Ratio 70/100/120:1
Example: Voltage transformer with a
tap in the secondary winding for
additional secondary voltage ratings
14 000 V Ratio
120/200:1
16
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Accuracy classes for revenue metering are based on the requirement that the transformer correction
factor (TCF) of the voltage transformer or of the current transformer shall be within the specified
limits when the power factor (lagging) of the metered load has any value from 0.6 to 1.0, under
specified conditions as follows:
a) For current transformers, at the specified standard burden (see 6.2 for standard burdens) at
10% or 5% (see Table 10), and at 100% of rated primary current [also at the current
corresponding to the rating factor (RF) if it is greater than 1.0]. The accuracy class at a lower
standard burden is not necessarily the same as at the specified standard burden.
b) For voltage transformers, for any burden in voltamperes from zero to the specified standard
burden, at the specified standard burden power factor (see 7.2 for standard burdens), and at
any voltage from 90% to 110% of the rated voltage. The accuracy class at a lower
standard burden of a different power factor is not necessarily the same as at the specified
standard burden.
5.2 Expression of transformer correction factor at 0.6 power factor (lagging) of metered load
It can be shown that a TCF at 0.6 power factor (lagging) of the metered load is as follows 8:
17
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
(1)
(2)
where
RCF is the ratio correction factor derived from 1 – (±Ratio Error/100). Note that for
transformers having negative ratio error the RCF will be greater than unity.
, ß is the phase angle, in minutes, for voltage transformers and current transformers, respectively.
The limits of transformer correction factor in standard accuracy classes shall be as shown in Table 8.
Table 8 —Standard accuracy class for metering service and corresponding limits of
transformer correction factor and ratio correction factor [0.6 to 1.0 power factor
(lagging) of metered load]c
Voltage transformers
Current transformers (at 90% to 110% rated
voltage) Metering
accuracy
At 5% rated current At 10% rated current At 100% rated currenta class
Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum
5.4 Limiting values of ratio correction factor and phase angle for standard
accuracy classes
The limiting values of RCF are the same as those for TCF (see 5.2). For any known value
of RCF for a given transformer the limiting values of the angles derived from the
9
expression in 5.2 are given as shown in Equation (3) and Equation (4).
9
- This is true of errors within the range of the standard metering accuracy classes.
18
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
or current transformers
in which TCF is taken as the maximum and minimum values, given in Table 8, for the specified
accuracy class.
These relations are shown graphically in Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4 for current
transformers, and Figure 5 for voltage transformers.
Figure 2 —Limits for accuracy classes for current transformers for metering
In Figure 2, the accuracy requirements for 100% rated current also apply at the continuous thermal current
rating of the transformer.
19
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Figure 3 —Limits for 0.15 accuracy class for current transformers for metering
In Figure 3, the transformer characteristics shall lie within the stated limits of the parallelogram at 5% and
100% of rated current. For current transformers, the 100% rated current limits also applies to the current
corresponding to the continuous thermal current rating factor, if it is greater than 1.0.
Figure 4 —Limits for 0.3S and 0.15S accuracy classes for current transformers for metering
In Figure 4, the transformer characteristics shall lie within the stated limits of the parallelogram from 5%
through 100% of rated current. For current transformers, the limit also applies to the current corresponding
to the continuous thermal current rating factor, if it is greater than 1.0.
20
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
6. Current transformers
a) Basic impulse insulation level in terms of full-wave test voltage (see Table 2).
b) Nominal system voltage or maximum system voltage (see Table 2).
d) Rated primary and secondary currents (see 6.3, as well as Table 9 and Table 2).
e) Accuracy classes at standard burdens (see 6.3, 6.4, as well as, Table 8, Table 10, and Table 13).
f) Continuous thermal current rating factor based on 30 °C average ambient air temperature, unless
otherwise stated (see 6.5).
g) Short-time mechanical current rating and short-time thermal current rating (see 6.6).
Table 9 —Example of ratings for current transformers with one or two ratios
Typical Current ratings (A)a
Double ratio with Double ratio with
taps in secondary series-parallel Single ratio
winding primary windings
25/50:5 25 × 50:5 1 500:5 150:5 5:5
50/100:5 50 × 100:5 1 600:5 200:5 10:5
100/200:5 100 × 200:5 2 000:5 250:5 15:5
200/400:5 200 × 400:5 2 500:5 300:5 20:5
300/600:5 400 × 800:5 3 000:5 400:5 25:5
400/800:5 500 × 1 000:5 4 000:5 500:5 30:5
500/1 000:5 600 × 1 200:5 5 000:5 600:5 40:5
600/1 200:5 1 000 × 2 000:5 6 000:5 750:5 50:5
1 000/2 000:5 2 000 × 4 000:5 8 000:5 800:5 60:5
1 500/3 000:5 10 000:5 1 000:5 75:5
2 000/4 000:5 12 000:5 1 200:5 100:5
a
Other ratings may be selected as agreed upon between manufacturer and end user.
Standard burdens for current transformers with 5 A rated secondary current shall have resistance and
inductance according to Table 10 for metering and Table 13 for relaying.
A current transformer for metering shall be given an accuracy rating for each standard burden for which it is
rated (see Clause 5). The accuracy class may be stated for the maximum burden for which it is rated and
will imply that all other lower burdens shall also be in that class; e.g., 0.3 B-1.8 would imply 0.3 B-0.1, B-
0.2, B-0.5, B-0.9, and B-1.8. If the accuracy class given is specific only to that burden it is assigned, e.g.,
21
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
0.3 @ B-0.5, or a range of burdens, e.g., 0.3 @ B0.5-B0.9, then the accuracy class is not guaranteed for
other burdens unless specifically stated.
Electronic meters and connecting circuits may present a lower burden, thus affecting a current transformers
ratio and phase angle. A current transformer that meets a given accuracy class at B-0.1 and less may not
meet the same accuracy class when the application calls for burden power factor between 0.9 and unity.
“E” burdens shall be stated separately.
The metering accuracy rating applies only to the full secondary winding, unless otherwise specified (seeTable 11).
22
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
3000:5 600:5
X3 X4 300:5 X2 X3 50:5
X4 X5 500:5 X1 X2 100:5
X3 X5 800:5 X1 X3 150:5
X1 X2 1000:5 X4 X5 200:5
X2 X3 1200:5 X3 X4 250:5
X2 X4 1500:5 X2 X4 300:5
X2 X5 2000:5 X1 X4 400:5
X1 X3 2200:5 X3 X5 450:5
X1 X4 2500:5 X2 X5 500:5
X1 X5 3000:5 X1 X5 600:5
4000:5 1200:5
X1 X2 500:5 X2 X3 100:5
X3 X4 1000:5 X1 X2 200:5
X2 X3 1500:5 X1 X3 300:5
X1 X3 2000:5 X4 X5 400:5
X2 X4 2500:5 X3 X4 500:5
X1 X4 3000:5 X2 X4 600:5
X2 X5 3500:5 X1 X4 800:5
X1 X5 4000:5 X3 X5 900:5
X2 X5 1000:5
X1 X5 1200:5
5000:5 2000:5
X2 X3 500:5 X3 X4 300:5
X4 X5 1000:5 X1 X2 400:5
X1 X2 1500:5 X4 X5 500:5
X3 X4 2000:5 X2 X3 800:5
X2 X4 2500:5 X2 X4 1100:5
X3 X5 3000:5 X1 X3 1200:5
X2 X5 3500:5 X1 X4 1500:5
X1 X4 4000:5 X2 X5 1600:5
X1 X5 5000:5 X1 X5 2000:5
A current transformer designed for relaying purposes shall be given an accuracy rating according to Table 12.
23
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
a
For window type CT with 50 secondary turns (250.5) or less, the ratio error at rated
current may exceed 3%.
Table 13 —Standard relaying burdens for current transformers with 5 A secondary windings
Impedance Resistance Burdens
Terminal Power Total Power Inductance Burden
()c ()
Voltage Factor (VA at 5 A) (mH) designationb
6.4.1.1 C classification
Covers current transformers in which the leakage flux in the core of the transformer does not have an
appreciable effect on the ratio(s) within the limits defined in 6.4 with standard burdens outlined in Table
13, so that the ratio can be calculated in accordance with 9.1.1, 9.1.2, and 9.1.3.
6.4.1.2 T classification
Covers current transformers in which the leakage flux does have an appreciable effect on the ratio(s) within
the limits defined in Table 13 with standard burdens outlined in Table 13, such that it is not practical to
calculate the ratio.
The relay classification for C and T class is given in terms of the secondary terminal voltage, which the
current transformer will deliver to a standard burden at 20 times rated current without exceeding the limits
outlined in 6.4. The secondary terminal voltage ratings are based on 5 A nominal secondary current (100 A
at 20 times) and standard burdens as per Table 13.
6.4.1.4 X classification
User defined for a specific condition in which the minimum secondary excitation requirements are given as
follows:
24
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Rct is the maximum allowable secondary winding direct current measured resistance corrected to 75 C
The ratio error at rated current shall be as defined in 6.4. If only Ek is given, then the manufacturer will
establish Ik and Rct based on the necessary design required to meet Ek.
For requirements for Class TPX, TPY, and TPZ current transformers, refer to IEC 61869-2.
The relay accuracy class applies only to the full winding, unless otherwise specified. If transformers have C
classification on the full winding, all tapped sections shall be arranged so that the ratio can be calculated in
accordance with 9.1.1, 9.1.2, and 9.1.3.
6.5 Continuous thermal current rating factors based on 30 °C average ambient air
temperature
The preferred continuous thermal current rating factors are 1.0, 1.33, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, or 4.0.
The short-time thermal current and short-time mechanical capabilities are not independent.
The short-time mechanical current rating is the maximum peak value of a fully displaced (asymmetrical)
primary current wave whose magnitude shall be 2.7 times the short-time thermal rating, that the
transformer is capable of withstanding with the secondary winding short-circuited. “Capable of
withstanding” shall be interpreted to mean that if subjected to this duty, the current transformer shall show
no damage and shall be capable of meeting the other applicable requirements of this standard.
The short-time thermal current rating of a current transformer is the rms symmetrical primary current that
can be carried for 1 s with the secondary winding short-circuited without exceeding in any winding the
limiting temperature. The temperature of a conductor in the windings of a current transformer shall be
determined from calculation using methods specified in 11.1.2.
The limiting temperature shall be 250 C for copper conductor or 200 C for electrical conductor (EC)
aluminum. A maximum temperature of 250 C shall be allowed for aluminum alloys that have resistance to
annealing properties at 250 C equivalent to EC aluminum at 200 C, or for applications of EC aluminum
where the characteristics of the fully annealed material satisfy the mechanical requirements.
If the 1 second rating is not dependent on core saturation (see 12.1), the short-time thermal current rating
for any time up to 5 s may be determined from the 1 s rating by dividing the current for 1 s by the square
root of the specified number of seconds. For example, the 3 second thermal current rating is equal to the 1
second current rating divided by the square root of 3, or 58% of the one-second rating. This calculation
includes the assumption that the primary current is symmetrical during the time interval.
Such current transformers, in which the primary conductor is not an integral part of the current
25
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
transformers, shall be rated in terms of primary current, even though the short-time mechanical and thermal
limitations and the continuous thermal limitations are those of the secondary winding only. Such ratings
specified for current transformers of this construction should not be considered to be applicable to the
conductor used for the primary winding of these transformers; as such, the conductor may be a component
of other apparatus or bus work having different limitations. For bushing-type current transformers, see
Annex B.
Current transformers should never be operated with the secondary circuit open because hazardous peak
voltages may result. Transformers conforming to this standard shall be capable of operating under
emergency conditions for 1 minute with rated primary current times the rating factor with the secondary
circuit open if the open-circuit voltage does not exceed 3500 V peak.
When the open circuit voltage exceeds 3500 V peak, the user should consider applying a voltage limiting
device (varistors or spark gaps) across the secondary terminals. The voltage limiting device should be able
to withstand an open-circuit situation for a period of 1 minute without damage to the secondary circuit. The
voltage limiting device may need to be replaced after such an abnormal condition.
For test frequencies of 120 Hz and below the 1 minute test voltage applied to the secondary terminals with
the primary winding open shall be twice the relay rated secondary terminal voltage given in 6.4.1.3 but not
less than 200 V. For test frequencies above 120 Hz, see 8.5.4 for test duration. Transformers with no relay
voltage classification shall be tested at 200 V.
For X classification the induced level shall be 2 × Ek or 2500 V rms (3.5 kV peak), whichever is less.
If a frequency higher than 60 Hz is necessary to avoid excessive exciting current, see 8.5.4 for reduced time
of application. If the voltage cannot be induced sinusoidally even at 400 Hz without core saturation, no test
is required.
This test is not required for window-type or bar-type 10 kV BIL current transformers that are rated below
600 A and that have no relay accuracy rating.
6.8 Nameplates
Current transformers shall be provided with nameplates that shall include, as a minimum, the following
information (see Table 7):
g) Nominal system voltage (NSV) and/or maximum system voltage (MSV) (none for bushing CTs)
26
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
k) Continuous thermal current rating factor (RF) (State ambient if other than 30 °C)
l) Accuracy rating
n) For oil-filled transformers the nameplate shall indicate that the transformer contains no detectable
levels of PCB at the time of manufacture.
NOTE 1—See IEEE Std C37.04 and NEMA SG 4 for nameplate requirements in high-voltage circuit breakers.
NOTE 2—Additional requirements for BCTs, refer to Annex B.
6.9 Terminals
The primary terminals of wound-type and bar-type current transformers shall be suitable for use with either
aluminum or copper conductors. The secondary terminals and voltage terminals, where provided, shall be
suitable for use with copper conductors.
The characteristic data in 6.10.1 and 6.10.2 suitable for portraying or calculating performance shall be
made available upon request.
a) Typical ratio correction factor and phase angle curves, for the standard burdens for which metering
accuracy ratings are assigned, plotted over the range of current per Table 8 from 0.1 or 0.05 times
rated current to the maximum continuous thermal current rating. These curves shall be plotted on
rectangular coordinate paper and need not be drawn where the errors exceed the limits of the 1.2
accuracy class.
b) Short-time mechanical and short-time thermal current ratings, as defined in 6.6.1 and 6.6.2,
respectively.
b) Short-time mechanical and short-time thermal current ratings, as defined in 6.6.1 and 6.6.2,
respectively.
c) Resistance of the secondary winding between the secondary terminals at a specified temperature
given in such a way that the value for each published ratio may be determined.
d) For C class transformers, typical excitation curves on log-log coordinate paper, with square
decades, plotted between excitation current and induced secondary voltage for each published ratio,
extending from 1% of the relay accuracy rating secondary terminal voltage to a voltage that will
cause an excitation current of five times rated secondary current.
27
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Curves shall also show the knee of the curve. For current transformers with nongapped cores, the
knee is defined as the point where the tangent is at 45° to the abscissa. For current transformers
conforming to this standard, it shall be possible to draw the above tangents to the excitation curves.
The maximum tolerance of excitation values above and below the knee shall be as shown (see
Figure 6).
NOTE—The 45° tangent was established from experience using conventional magnetic materials. The
significance of these tangent points will be dependent on the magnetic material in use.
e) For T class transformers, typical overcurrent ratio curves on rectangular coordinate paper plotted
between primary and secondary current over the range from 1 to 22 times rated primary current for
all the standard burdens )1 0( up to the standard burden, which causes a ratio correction of 50% (see
Figure 7).
Figure 6 —Typical excitation curves for multi ratio C class current transformers with nongapped cores
)10(
Except B-0.9 and B-1.8.
28
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Tests for current transformers with metering accuracy ratings shall be made on each transformer, and they
shall consist of the measurement of ratio error (ratio correction factor) and phase angle at rating factor,
100% and at 10% or 5% of rated current as per Table 8, when energized at rated frequency and rated
burden. Unless otherwise requested by the customer, non-compensated current transformers shall be tested
at only the maximum rated burden.
Routine accuracy tests for current transformers with a relay accuracy rating shall be made on each
transformer and shall consist of a turns ratio check, secondary excitation, and RCF measurements at 100%
rated current with standard rated burden. For ring-type cores of low reactance, the RCF measurement may
29
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
be the composite error performed by secondary excitation at the voltage equivalent to standard rated burden
at 100% as calculated in 9.1.1, 9.1.2, and 9.1.3.
The routine secondary excitation test shall consist of a knee point determination for C class transformers to
prove compliance with the published characteristic curve.
For X classification transformers, the routine secondary excitation test shall consist of measurements of
exciting voltage versus exciting current at Ek, and at two additional points (one point above Ek and one
point below Ek). The test points are arbitrary and selected for convenience to verify conformance, and shall
be at least 50% of Ek. If Rct was a given parameter, it shall be measured and corrected to 75 °C.
All excitation measurements shall be compared with the published curve, and shall comply with the limits
indicated in Figure 6 (except for X class where Ek and Ik are maximum limits). Additional points may be
required as deemed necessary to prove compliance.
7. Voltage transformers
a) Basic impulse insulation level in terms of full-wave test voltage (see Table 14 through Table 18, as
well as Figure 8 through Figure 15).
b) Rated primary voltage and ratio (see Table 14 through Table 18, as well as Figure 8 through Figure
15). Secondary voltage is 120 V up to 25 kV class inclusive and 115 volts above 25 kV.
c) Frequency (in Hz)
In Table 14 through Table 17, voltage transformers connected line-to-ground on an ungrounded system
cannot be considered grounding transformers and shall not be operated with the secondary windings in
closed delta because excessive currents may flow in the delta.
10 1:1 120/208Y
10 2:1 240/416Y
10 2.5:1 300/520Y
30 1:1 120/208Y
30 2:1 240/416Y
30 2.5:1 300/520Y
30 4:1 480/832Y
30 5:1 600/1 040Y
60 20:1 2 400/4 160Y
75 35:1 4 200/7 270Y
75 40:1 4 800/8 320Y
110 or 95 60:1 7 200/12 470Y
110 or 95 70:1 8 400/14 400Y
150 or 125 100:1 12 000/20 750Y
30
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
OR
10 1:1 120
10 2:1 240
10 2.5:1 300
10 4:1 480
10 5:1 600
45 20:1 2 400
60 40:1 4 800
75 60:1 7 200
110 or 95 100:1 12 000
110 or 95 120:1 14 400
150 or 125 200:1 24 000
200 or 150 300:1 34 500
31
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
OR
32
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
550 or 450 600/1 000 & 600/1 000:1 69 000/115 000 Grd Y
650 700/1 200 & 700/1 200:1 80 500/138 000 Grd Y
750 800/1 400 & 800/1 400:1 92 000/161 000 Grd Y
1050 or 900 1 200/2 000 & 1 200/2 000:1 138 000/230 000 Grd Y
1300 or 1175 1 800/3 000 & 1 800/3 000:1 207 000/345 000 Grd Y
1800 or 1675 2 500/4 500 & 2 500/4 500:1 287 500/500 000 Grd Y
2050 3 750/6 250 & 3 750/6 250:1 431 250/750 000 Grd Y
NOTE—The double voltage ratio is usually achieved by a tap in the secondary winding. In such cases, the
nonpolarity terminal of the winding shall be the common terminal.
a Group 3 voltage transformers are for line-to-ground connection only and have two secondary windings. They may be insulated-
neutral or grounded-neutral terminal type. Ratings through 92 000/161 000 Grd Y shall be capable of the square root of 3 times
rated voltage (this capability does not preclude the possibility of ferroresonance) for 1 minute without exceeding a 175 C
temperature rise for copper conductor or a 125 C rise for EC aluminum. Ratings 138 000/230 000 Grd Y and above shall be
capable of operation at 140% of rated voltage with the same limitation of time and temperature. (For typical connections, see
Figure 12.) Group 3 transformers shall be capable of continuous operation at 110% of rated voltages, provided the burden in volt-
amperes at this voltage does not exceed the thermal burden rating.
33
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
a Group 4 voltage transformers are for line-to-ground connection only. They may be insulated-neutral or grounded-neutral
terminal type. (For typical connections of Group 4A, see Figure 13. For typical connections of Group 4B, see Figure 14.)
Group 4 transformers shall be capable of continuous operation at 110% of rated voltages, provided the burden in volt-
amperes at this voltage does not exceed the thermal burden rating. Group 4A voltage transformers shall be capable of
operation at 125% of rated voltage on an emergency (8 h) basis (this capability does not preclude the possibility of
ferroresonance), provided the burden, in volt-amperes at rated voltage, does not exceed 64% of the thermal burden rating,
without exceeding the following average winding temperatures: 105 C for 55 C rise types, 115 C for 65 C rise types and
130 C for 80 C rise types (this will result in a reduction of normal life expectancy).
34
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Standard burdens for voltage transformers for rating purposes are shown in Table 19.
35
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
A voltage transformer shall be assigned an accuracy rating for each of the standard burdens for which it is
rated (see Clause 5). The accuracy class may be stated for the maximum burden for which it is rated and
will imply that all other lower burdens shall be in that class; e.g., 0.3Z would imply 0.3 class at 0, W, X, M,
Y, and Z. If the class is different at other burdens, it shall be stated as follows: 0.3Y, 0.6Z, and 1.2ZZ, or it
may be stated at a specific burden, such as 0.3 @ Y, where the accuracy class is not guaranteed for other
burdens unless specifically stated.
7.3.2 Accuracy classification for voltage transformers with two secondary windings or
tapped secondary windings
The burden on any two secondary terminals affects the accuracy on all other terminals. The burden stated
in the accuracy ratings is the total burden on the transformer. The accuracy class shall apply with the
burden divided between the secondary outputs in any manner.
The thermal burden rating of a voltage transformer shall be specified in terms of the maximum burden in
volt-amperes that the transformer can carry at rated secondary voltage without exceeding the temperature
rise given in Table 4.
If no thermal burden in volt-amperes rating is given, the thermal burden rating in volt-amperes shall be the
same as the maximum standard burden for which an accuracy rating is given.
Each winding, including the primary winding, of a multiple-secondary transformer shall be given a thermal
burden rating. If only one thermal burden rating is specified, it shall be equally divided among the
secondary windings unless otherwise specified.
7.5 Nameplates
Voltage transformers shall be provided with nameplates that shall include, as a minimum, the following
information (see Table 7):
j) Accuracy rating: the highest accuracy rating at the maximum standard burden (e.g., 0.3ZZ)
k) Applicable standard (IEEE Std C57.13 for Class 1 and IEEE Std C57.13.5 for Class 2)
l) For oil-filled transformers the nameplate shall indicate that the transformer contains no detectable
levels of PCB at the time of manufacture
36
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
7.6 Terminals
Primary terminals shall be electrically and mechanically suitable for use with either copper or aluminum
conductors. Secondary terminals shall be electrically and mechanically suitable for use with copper
conductors.
Voltage transformers shall be capable of withstanding for 1 second the mechanical and thermal stresses
resulting from a short circuit on the secondary terminals with full voltage maintained on the primary
terminals. “Capable of withstanding” shall be interpreted to mean that, if subjected to this duty, the voltage
transformer shall show no damage and it shall be capable of meeting the other applicable requirements of
this standard. The temperature of the conductors in the windings of voltage transformers under short-circuit
conditions shall be determined from calculations using the methods specified in 13.1. The limiting
temperature shall be 250 C for copper conductors or 200 C for EC aluminum conductors. A maximum
temperature of 250 C shall be allowed for aluminum alloys that have resistance to annealing properties at
250 C equivalent to EC aluminum at 200 C, or for applications of EC aluminum where the characteristics
of the fully annealed material satisfy the mechanical requirements.
a) Typical ratio correction factor and phase angle curves for rated primary voltage (and, when
specified, for rated primary voltage divided by the square root of 3), plotted for the standard
burdens from 0 VA to the volt-amperes of the burden, and also plotted for unity power factor
burden from 0 VA to the volt-amperes of the largest standard burden plotted. Ratio correction
factor and phase angle data for other burdens may be calculated by methods outlined in 8.1 and
10.1.
b) Accuracy ratings for all standard burdens up to and including the maximum standard burden rating
of the transformer.
CAUTION
Many of the tests called for in this subclause involve high voltage. Therefore, they should be performed
only by experienced personnel familiar with any dangers that may exist in the test setups and test
procedures. Although some dangers are specifically pointed out herein, it is impractical to list all possible
dangers and precautions.
See 8.5.4 for test frequency and duration. The test voltage shall be as follows:
a) For transformers with two fully insulated primary terminals, the test voltage shall be twice the rated
voltage of the windings.
b) For insulated-neutral or grounded-neutral terminal-type transformers, the test voltage shall be equal
to the power frequency withstand voltage specified in Table 2 for the BIL.
These tests shall be made on each transformer and shall consist of ratio and phase angle tests at 100% of
rated primary voltage at rated frequency with zero burden, and with the maximum standard burden for
which the transformer is rated at its best accuracy class.
37
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
CAUTION
Many of the tests called for in this clause involve high voltage. Therefore, they should be performed only
by experienced personnel familiar with any dangers that may exist in the test setups and test procedures.
Although some dangers are specifically pointed out herein, it is impractical to list all possible dangers and
precautions.
a) Revenue metering applications: to have proper traceability the uncertainty ratio of the accuracy
measuring systems shall be no less than 4:1, as specified in ANSI/NCSL Z540-3. For example: for
the 0.3 class transformers, the system’s errors shall not exceed ±0.075% for ratio and ±0.75 mrad
(2.6 min) for phase angle.
b) Other applications: ±1.2% for ratio and ±17.5 mrad (1°) for phase angle.
In selecting the measurement method to use from those listed in this subclause, the maximum uncertainty
should be considered. For example, item b) includes relaying, load control, and similar applications. For
these applications, acceptable uncertainty is usually obtainable with nonprecise methods not discussed
herein.
The equipment used for accuracy tests shall be traceable to a national or international standards bureau or
agency. Records of accuracy verification for the calibration systems by an independent laboratory shall be
regularly maintained.
The maximum interval shall be five years for non-electronic equipment and one year for electronic devices,
unless specified otherwise by the measuring equipment manufacturer.
8.1.2 General
Instrument transformers considered herein are designed either for metering or for relaying applications. The
ratio of a transformer can be described by Equation (5):
(5)
where
b is the phase angle between phasors (positive when the secondary phasor leads the primary phasor)
[in radians]
38
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
The expression in Cartesian form is close enough, and is as shown in Equation (6) as follows:
(6)
where
(1+a) is identified as the RCF
If the transformer is to be used for revenue metering, the method of calibration shall permit the
determination of both the ratio and the phase angle to the uncertainties prescribed in 8.1.1. If the
transformer is to be used only for relaying, only the ratio needs to be determined. This may be achieved
either experimentally or by computation.
The circuit shall be arranged to avoid or minimize spurious magnetic coupling and the consequent
generation of unknown electromotive forces. Thus, the measuring network should be as far removed as is
practical from conductors carrying large currents, and twisted bifilar or coaxial leads shall be used to
minimize effects from loops.
The proper location of grounds and the proper use of electrostatic shielding and guarding networks are
critical. These locations are governed by the type of circuit and cannot be uniquely prescribed. The
controlling criterion is arranged so that spurious capacitance current cannot enter or leave the measuring
circuit. The arrangement shall eliminate these leakage paths or otherwise control them so that the
capacitance effects are negligible or adequately calculable.
The error of an instrument transformer is a function of current (or voltage), burden, and frequency. For the
minimum uncertainty, the calibration shall be made under the conditions the transformer will encounter in
service. This requirement is appreciably more stringent for current transformers (CTs) than for voltage
transformers (VTs), since the excitation of the CT core varies over wide limits. The voltage normally
applied to the VT is nearly constant so that its excitation varies over a limited range. Also, the error of a
voltage transformer at a given voltage can be computed for any burden at any power factor if the errors are
known for zero burden and for another burden at known power factor.
The errors of a current transformer may be influenced by its location and orientation relative to nearby
high-current conductors. To achieve reproducible results, such conductors should be arranged to minimize
current transformer errors.
To ensure meaningful results, the current transformer shall be demagnetized prior to calibration. Even after
demagnetization, stray direct currents present in the test circuit, e.g., from a dc resistance measurement,
may remagnetize the transformer and introduce errors that will not permit reproducible results.
The errors of a voltage transformer that is not completely enclosed within a shielded structure, such as a
metal tank, can be influenced by the proximity of nearby objects. However, except for high-precision
laboratory measurements, this effect is usually negligible.
Heating effects are also of particular importance in accuracy testing of current transformers. Where
relatively high magnitudes of primary or secondary current, or both, are involved, the test equipment
should have sufficient thermal capacity to permit making the necessary measurements without significant
heating. In making overcurrent accuracy tests, such as for relaying application, care should be exercised to
ensure that (1) the short-time thermal current rating of the transformer under test is not exceeded and (2)
self-heating during the measurements does not materially alter the characteristics being measured.
39
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Impedance measurements discussed in 8.2.2 uses terminology typically used for power and distribution
transformers. Impedance measurements discussed in 9.3.1 and 10.2.1 use terminology typically used for
instrument transformers.
The voltage required to circulate the rated current of the transformer under short-circuit conditions is the
impedance voltage of the transformer as viewed from the terminals of the excited winding.
The impedance voltage is comprised of an equivalent resistance component and a reactive component. It is
not practical to measure these components separately, but after the loss and the impedance voltage are
measured, the components may be separated by calculation.
It is sufficient to measure and adjust the current in the excited winding only, because the current in the
short-circuited winding will be the correct value (except for a negligible excitation current) when the
current in the excited winding is correct. The introduction of current-measuring equipment in series with
the short-circuited winding may introduce large errors in the impedance measurements.
For two-winding transformers, one of the windings (either the high-turn or the low-turn) is short-circuited,
and voltage at rated frequency is applied to the other winding and adjusted to circulate rated current in the
winding.
For transformers having more than two windings, the impedance voltage is a function of the test
connections used. When making tests on multiple-winding transformers, the windings should be connected
in such a manner as to provide the correct impedance data for the purpose intended.
Resistive and reactive components of the impedance voltage are determined by the use of Equation (7) and
Equation (8).
(7)
(8)
Where:
Vr is the voltage, in-phase component
Vx is the voltage, quadrature component
Vz is the impedance voltage
Pz is the power in watts
I is the current in amperes in excited winding
The I2R losses of the two windings are calculated from the ohmic resistance measurements (corrected to the
temperature at which the impedance test is made) and the currents that are used in the impedance
measurement. These I2R losses subtracted from the impedance loss give the stray losses of the transformer.
The temperature of the windings shall be taken immediately before and after the impedance measurements
in a manner similar to that described in 8.4. The average shall be taken as the true temperature.
Loss measurements are not mandatory and only need to be performed if requested. The circuit connection
for the measurement of exciting current and loss is shown in Figure 16. A series of simultaneous readings
are taken on the ammeter, rms reading voltmeter, average reading voltmeter, calibrated in rms, and
wattmeter.
40
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
The following two excitation current curves can be drawn from the data obtained:
If these curves differ, the supply voltage is not a sine wave. In this case, curve 1 will be lower and curve 2
will be higher than the corresponding curve for sine wave voltage. If the two curves are within 2% of each
other, either curve can be used without correction. If they differ by 2% to 10%, the value of the average
reading voltmeter is used to determine the excitation current on a sine-wave basis. If they differ by more
than 10%, very serious waveform distortion is indicated and appropriate circuit changes shall be made. 11 ) 1(1
The excitation loss of a transformer includes the dielectric loss and core loss. It is measured by the
wattmeter in Figure 16.
The excitation loss determination is based on a sine wave voltage applied to the terminals of the
transformer. Peaked voltage waves (form factor greater than 1.11) resulting generally from the nonlinear
character of the excitation load of the transformer on the test source, give smaller excitation losses than a
sine wave voltage. Flat-topped voltage waves, rarely encountered in such tests, give larger losses.
Current transformer cores should be demagnetized just prior to excitation loss measurements, and all
measurements should be made on the low-current winding with other windings open-circuited
WARNING
This circuit may result in abnormally high voltages at the high-voltage terminals and abnormally low
currents in the excitation circuit of certain voltage transformers. Safety precautions should be taken
This method may be performed as shown in Figure 16 except without the wattmeter. The exciting current is
measured at an induction level equivalent to rated current with standard rated burden. The exciting current
may be considered the total error as defined in 9.1.2.3.
Measurements on voltage transformers and current transformers under overcurrent conditions are made
)11(
Very large waveform distortion can be detected more conveniently by oscilloscope or wave analyzer.
41
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
using the average-reading voltmeter. The average value of the test voltage applied shall be the same as the
average value of the desired sine wave of voltage at the proper frequency. Under this condition, the
hysteresis component of the loss will be correct.
It is recommended that the test be made on the low-voltage winding with all other windings open circuited.
When the low-voltage winding is excited, full voltage will appear across the high-voltage winding and
safety precautions shall be taken.
After the voltage is adjusted to the desired value as indicated by the average-reading voltmeter, the
simultaneous values of rms voltage, power, and current are recorded. Then the tare on the wattmeter,
representing the losses of the connected instruments, is read and subtracted from the earlier wattmeter
reading to obtain the excitation loss of the transformer.
Exciting current measurements are obtained at the same time that loss measurements are made. In order to
obtain the correct exciting current measurement, the tare on the ammeter, which represents the current
taken by the voltage elements of the wattmeter and voltmeters, shall be measured and subtracted vectorially
from the previous current measurements. If the readings of voltage as indicated on the rms voltmeter and
the average-reading voltmeter differ by more than 2%, the measurements shall also be corrected for
waveform (see IEEE Std 4).
8.3 Polarity
The lead polarity of a transformer is a designation of the relative instantaneous directions of currents in its
leads. Primary and secondary leads are said to have the same polarity when at a given instant the current
enters the primary lead in question and leaves the secondary lead in question in the same direction as
though the two leads formed a continuous circuit.
Two methods are in common use for determining the polarity of instrument transformers. They are as
follows:
a) Comparison with a transformer of known polarity (see 9.4.1 and 10.3.1)
b) The direct comparison of winding voltages
8.3.1 Direct comparison of winding voltages
To determine the polarity of instrument transformers using this method, do the following:
a) Connect the high-turn and low-turn windings as shown in Figure 17. In most cases, the high-turn
winding of a current transformer is X1X2 and that of a voltage transformer is H1H2.
b) Energize the circuit from a controlled voltage source at the terminals AB of the high-turn winding.
c) Read the value of the voltages across AB and BD.
d) If the voltage across BD is less than the voltage across AB, the polarity is as marked. If the voltage
across BD is greater than the voltage across AB, the polarity is reversed.
WARNING
The source voltage should always be impressed across the high turn winding; otherwise, dangerously high
voltages might be encountered.
NOTE—The suitability of this method for high-ratio transformers is limited by the sensitivity of the voltmeter used.
42
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
These measurements are made on instrument transformers for the following reasons:
a) To calculate relaying accuracy of type C current transformers
b) To establish the winding resistance at a known temperature for use in temperature rise tests
c) To calculate winding temperatures and temperature rises at the completion of temperature rise tests
d) To permit calculation of ratios under load conditions (for voltage transformers)
e) To confirm Rct for X class current transformers
WARNING
Windings other than the one whose resistance is being measured should be short circuited. This is important
both as a safety measure to prevent the induction of high voltages and to reduce the time required for the
direct current to stabilize.
If, however, a resistance network is made four-terminal, its resistance can be defined precisely and can be
measured by four-terminal techniques. One pair of terminals (current terminals) is located outside a second
pair (potential terminals) as shown in Figure 18.
43
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
The resistance is defined as the open-circuit voltage across the potential terminals divided by the current
entering and leaving the current terminals. Thus, for example, if the resistance of a winding between two
points ‘a’ and ‘b’ is needed, the potential leads are connected to terminals P1 and P2, and the current leads
are connected to terminals C1 and C2.
There is no precise rule that governs the selection of a four-terminal measurement over a two-terminal one.
The choice depends primarily on the magnitude of the resistance and on the accuracy to which it is to be
measured. However, either contact resistance or uncertainties in lead resistance may be as much as 0.01 Ω.
Both two-terminal and four-terminal resistance measurements may be made using voltmeter-ammeter
methods or bridge methods. The four-terminal measurement should be used for resistances of 1 Ω and
below. Resistance bridges suitable to measure the resistance down to the µohm range are commercially
available.
The Wheatstone bridge consists of a pair of ratio arms, an adjustable resistance arm for achieving balance,
and an arm containing the resistance to be measured. In the commercial versions, the ratio arms are
equipped so that any one of several ratios can be readily selected. Thus, resistances can be measured over a
wide range with maximum resolution available from the adjustable arm.
The double-ratio arm bridge is more complex in both its design and its operation. Textbooks in electrical
measurements contain excellent discussions of the bridge and should be consulted. Generally speaking, the
bridge measures a four-terminal resistance in such a way that its points of attachment to the measuring
circuit and its lead resistances do not enter into the measurement.
The lowest measurement uncertainty available from either type of bridge can be obtained if a substitution
technique is employed. The technique, however, requires a known standard whose nominal value is the
same as the resistance being measured. The bridge is first balanced with the standard in the unknown arm
and is then rebalanced with the standard replaced by the unknown resistor. In this way, only the small
difference between the two is measured, and since the other arms of the bridge remain unchanged, their
values need not be known.
The reference temperature of the winding shall be determined accurately when measuring the winding
resistance of the relaying accuracy current transformers and for use in temperature rise tests. The
temperature of the winding shall not be assumed to be the same as the surrounding air.
The resistance measurements shall be made on a transformer only when the winding temperature is stable.
The temperature is considered stable if the external surface temperature of dry-type transformers or top
liquid temperature of oil-filled transformers does not vary more than 1 ºC in a 1-hour period.
Dielectric tests should be made with the transformer at room temperature, and unless otherwise specified,
the voltage should be measured in accordance with IEEE Std 4.
When tests are required on bushings or insulators separately from the transformers, the tests shall be made
in accordance with IEEE Std C57.19.00.
44
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
The purpose of dielectric tests in the factory is to check the insulation and workmanship and to demonstrate
that the transformer has been designed to withstand the specified insulation tests.
It is recognized that the dielectric tests impose a severe stress on the insulation and, if applied frequently,
will hasten breakdown or may cause breakdown. The stress imposed, of course, is more severe the higher
the value of the applied voltage. Hence, periodic testing may not be advisable.
It is recommended that initial user tests of insulation should not be in excess of 75% of the factory test
voltage; that for old apparatus rebuilt in the field, tests should not be in excess of 75% of the factory test
voltage; and the periodic insulation tests by the user should not be in excess of 65% of the factory test
voltage. Tests made by the user for design approval may be made at 100% of the factory test voltage.
The terminal ends and taps brought out of the case from the winding under test shall all be joined together
and connected to the line terminal of the testing transformer. All other terminals and parts (including tank
and core, if accessible) should be connected to ground and to the other terminal of the testing transformer.
The ground connection between the apparatus being tested and the testing transformer shall be a substantial
metallic circuit.
Wire of sufficient size and suitable arrangement to prevent excessive partial discharge (corona) at the test
voltage should be used in connecting the respective taps, line terminals, and the test transformer together.
Care shall be taken to keep the wire on the high-voltage side well away from the ground. No appreciable
impedance should be placed between the testing transformer and the one under test.
It is recommended that a suitable current-sensitive failure detection device be provided. The reason for this
is that the voltage change across the test transformer at failure may not easily be detected by observation of
the input voltmeter.
As a safety precaution, a relief gap set at a voltage 10% to 20% in excess of the specified test voltage
should be connected during the applied voltage test. For instrument transformers to be tested at 50 kV or
less, it is permissible to omit the relief gap (see 8.5).
The applied test voltage should be started at one third or less of full value and increased gradually to full
value in not more than 15 s. After being held for 1 minute, it should be reduced gradually in not more than
15 s to one third of the maximum value or less and the circuit opened.
The applied voltage test requirements for insulated-neutral-terminal types of voltage transformers are
specified in 4.5.
These tests are made by applying voltage to one winding with all the other windings open. One end of each
winding shall be grounded during this test. Usually the voltage is applied to the low-voltage winding. When
the voltage across any winding will exceed 50 kV during this test, some means should be provided to verify
the voltage.
As this test (if made at rated frequency) overexcites the transformer under test, the frequency of the applied
voltage should be such as to prevent saturation of the core. Ordinarily this requirement necessitates the use
45
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
of a frequency of 120 Hz or more when exciting 60 Hz units. For those types that have large distributed
capacitance, the excitation current increases with the frequency of the applied voltage, making it necessary
to guard against an exciting current that will exceed 200% normal load current based on the thermal rating.
When frequencies higher than 120 Hz are used, the severity of the test is abnormally increased, and for this
reason, the duration of the test should be reduced in accordance with Table 20.
The voltage should be started at one-third or less of the full value and be increased gradually to full value in
not more than 15 s. After being held for the duration of time specified in Table 20, it should be reduced
gradually in not more than 15 s to one-third the maximum value, or less, and the circuit opened.
Voltage transformers in polyphase metering equipment may be tested with single-phase voltage. Usually
the specified test voltage is applied to one of the windings on each core with the neutral ends of the open
windings grounded.
Partial discharge (PD) tests are intended to determine the freedom of internal insulation from damaging
internal discharges.
The preferred arrangement for making the partial discharge test is to have the instrument transformer under
test to be fully assembled prior to conducting the test; however, during the partial discharge test, if external
fittings or hardware on the assembled transformer being tested results in interfering with the test, they may
be removed or provided with supplementary shielding.
Oil-filled, gas-filled, and dry-type instrument transformers 5 kV nominal system voltage and above shall be
given a partial discharge test as a routine test. No test shall be made on terminals that are intended to be
grounded.
At the discretion of the manufacturer, the induced or applied voltage and partial discharge tests may be
performed together.
If necessary, external electrodes may be used for the primary terminal and the ground of the transformer.
The test method shall be in accordance with IEC 60270. For typical test circuits see IEC 60270.
When using a 60 Hz pre-stress voltage it shall be maintained for a minimum of 60 s; where a higher
frequency is used the duration may be reduced as per Table 20. Subsequently the test voltage shall be
reduced to the level of the prescribed extinction voltage, which shall then be maintained for a minimum of
30 s. The partial discharge intensity shall be measured during this time. It is recommended that the
reduction from the pre-stress to test voltage be done over approximately 10 s.
The transformer shall be considered as having met the requirements if the partial discharge intensity
measured at the prescribed extinction voltage level is equal to or less than 10 pC for oil-filled or gas-filled
46
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
For current transformers the test voltage shall be applied to H1 and H2. All secondary terminals and the
base shall be grounded.
For line-to-line voltage transformers, the partial discharge shall be measured for each of the following
connections:
a) The test voltage shall be applied to H1. H2, one end of each secondary winding, and the base shall
be grounded.
b) The test voltage shall be applied to H2. H1, one end of each secondary winding, and the base shall
be grounded.
For line-to-ground voltage transformers the test voltage shall be applied to H1. H2, one end of each
secondary winding and the base shall be grounded.
For combination units containing both a voltage and current transformer the pre-stress and prescribed
extinction test voltages shall be based upon the guidelines established below for voltage transformers. The
connections for the combination units are to be made with the voltage applied to H1 and H2 with the
current transformer secondary terminals grounded one secondary of the voltage transformer grounded and
the base grounded.
A partial discharge test shall be made after all dielectric tests are completed; however, the partial discharge
test may be performed while decreasing the voltage after the induced or applied voltage test. If the
measured PD level exceeds the permitted limits, a separate test shall be performed and shall govern.
a
The values shown are for the reduced insulation levels in reference to Table 2.
b
The standard recognizes the difficulties of partial discharge measurement at these voltage levels under the industrial
environments with high noise level. The problem is aggravated if the test laboratories are undersized and world-class extra-high-
voltage laboratories are required. Therefore,
for the transformers of these voltage ratings, the prescribed extinction voltages are reduced to 1.5
times the rated voltages, which are considered still acceptable since the ground fault factor for a grounded or effectively grounded
system does not exceed 1.4.
)12(
It is recommended that the actual measured partial discharge extinction voltage be recorded.
47
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
8.6.1 Partial discharge measurement for voltage transformers for a nominal system
voltage of 72 kV and below
For Group 1 transformers with extended overvoltage ratings the 1.2 multiplier indicated above may be
changed by agreement between the customer and manufacturer.
8.6.2 Partial discharge measurement for current transformers for a nominal system voltage
of 72 kV and below
48
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
For current transformers having substantially continuous ring cores, uniformly distributed secondary
windings, and having either a centrally located primary conductor or a uniformly distributed primary
winding, the values of ratio, ratio error, and phase angle may be obtained by calculation (computation)
from the obtained secondary excitation characteristics at the rated frequency.
Although the following indirect test will lead to results which are close to the results obtained in the direct
test, the routine accuracy tests for the metering current transformers shall always be performed as a direct
test. On the other hand, the alternative method is suitable for on-site measurements, and for monitoring
purposes.
For current transformers with negligible leakage fluxes, the equivalent circuit shown in Figure 19 and the
vector diagram shown in Figure 20 are suitable for calculations. It shall be noted that the alternative
(indirect) method never considers the influence of stray fluxes entering the core from the adjacent
conductors.
49
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Assuming that electric and magnetic components of transformer and burden are linear, and primary current
is sinusoidal, then performance of this transformer can be illustrated by the following vector diagram.
In Figure 20, IS represents the secondary current. It flows through the total secondary impedance ZΣ of the
secondary winding and the burden which determines the magnitude and direction of the induced voltage EO
and of the flux Φ which is perpendicular to the voltage vector. This flux is maintained by the exciting
current Ie, having a magnetizing component Im parallel to the flux Φ, and a loss (or active) component Ia
parallel to the voltage. The vector sum of the secondary current IS and the exciting current Ie is the vector
I’P representing the primary current IP divided by the turns ratio (number of secondary turns to number of
primary turns).
For a current transformer with the turns ratio equal to the rated transformation ratio, the difference in the
lengths of the vectors IS and I’P, related to the length of I’P, is the current ratio error (RE), and the angular
difference β is a phase angle (PA).
50
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
)13(
characteristics and equivalent circuits
A substantially sinusoidal voltage ES is injected between secondary terminals X1 and X2 of the CT. The
voltage EP across the terminals H1and H2, and exciting current Ie are measured. The value of ES should be
selected to obtain measureable voltages on both windings but shall not exceed the knee point voltage EK.
Turns ratio may be determined from the relationship:
(9)
where
NS is turns on the secondary winding
NP is turns on the primary winding EO
is (ES – Ie×RS)
RS is the resistance of the secondary winding at 75 °C
In the case of window-type CTs an artificial primary winding has to be established. If they are installed on
equipment, consideration shall be taken as to what the artificial primary winding used in this test is
comprised of.
Determine the equivalent operational secondary voltage ET at the desired secondary current IS (i.e., 5 A, 0.5
A, or some other point of interest) and burden
ET = Is x ZƩ (10)
(11)
RB is the resistance component of the secondary burden
XB is the reactive component of the secondary burden
Inject the substantially sinusoidal voltage ET between secondary terminals X1 and X2 of the CT. The
secondary exciting current Ie is measured.
Employing fundamental formulas for current transformer (see Harris [B9]), the accuracy
performance yields:
(12)
(13)
where
Φ is the angle between impedance ZΣ and resistance RΣ=(Rs + RB)
θ is the angle between apparent power VA and active power W
9.1.2.3 Calculation of current transformer composite error
From Equation (10) determine the equivalent operational secondary voltage ET at some desired secondary
current IS (rated current, 20 times rated current, or some other point of interest) and burden. Inject the
)13(
Refer to 8.2.3 for additional information.
51
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
substantially sinusoidal voltage ET between secondary terminals X1 and X2 of the CT. The secondary
exciting current Ie is measured.
(14)
Since T-type current transformers have appreciable leakage flux entering the core, they cannot be
represented adequately by an equivalent circuit. This type of current transformer does not lend itself to
simple, accurate calculations. Therefore, these calculations are primarily applicable to types C, i.e.,
bushing-type current transformers for relaying service.
Since these transformers are generally multiratio, the most useful form in which the transformer secondary
excitation characteristics may be given is a family of curves similar to Figure 1 showing the excitation
voltage and currents on the secondary winding turns base for each ratio. These curves are usually
determined from test data taken on a typical unit of a given design by the method covered in 8.2.3.
9.2 Demagnetization
a) Method 1. Connect the current transformer in the test circuit as shown in Table 21. Apply enough
current to the high-turn winding (usually X1X2) to saturate the core of the transformer as
determined by the ammeter and voltmeter readings; then slowly reduce the current to zero. The
rated secondary current of the transformer shall not be exceeded.
b) Method 2. Connect the current transformer in the test circuit as shown in Figure 22. Pass rated
current through the low-turn winding (usually H1H2). Increase the resistance R in the high-turn
winding (usually X1X2) circuit until the transformer core is saturated and then slowly reduce the
resistance to zero and disconnect the current source. Saturation of the core is indicated by a
reduction of current in the high-turn winding circuit.
52
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
WARNING
A continuously variable resistance shall be used to avoid opening the high turn winding circuit when
resistance values are changed, since, as the resistance is increased, the voltage across the resistance will
approach the dangerous open-circuit value.
The measured short-circuit impedance of a current transformer is the sum of the primary and secondary
impedance. Since the secondary impedance cannot be determined from this information alone, the data
obtained is of little value in the calculation of ratio and phase angle characteristics. However, it is of value
in determining the burden imposed on main transformers by auxiliary transformers.
Except for current, the quantities measured in making impedance measurements on current transformers are
extremely small and great care shall be exercised in order to obtain accurate results.
For the purpose of impedance measurements, current transformers can be divided into the following three
types, according to their physical details:
a) Type 1: Bushing-type, window-type, or bar-type, with turns well distributed about the core. In
current transformers of this type, the leakage reactance is extremely small and the impedance may
be considered to be the resistance of the whole winding or that part to be used if it is well
distributed. The manufacturer should be consulted if the winding distribution is not known.
b) Type 2: Wound type in which the high-current (primary) terminals are at opposite ends of the
transformer. Transformers of this type should be excited from the high-current winding with the
low-current winding short circuited, because a short circuit on the high-current winding will
introduce appreciable error in the measurement due to the added impedance of the short-circuiting
connections.
It is recommended that the three-voltmeter method, as described in 10.2.1, be used for impedance
53
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
c) Type 3: Wound type in which the high-current (primary) leads are brought out parallel to each
other through a single bushing. Current transformers of this type may be excited from either the
high-current or the low-current winding with the other winding short circuited.
Either the three-voltmeter method or the wattmeter, voltmeter, ammeter method can be used for
impedance measurements on transformers of this type, depending on which winding is excited.
9.4 Polarity
To determine the polarity of current transformers using this method, do the following:
b) Energize the circuit from a controlled current source so that the test current flows in the H1H2
windings as shown in Figure 23.
c) If the ammeter reads the sum of the currents in the high-turn windings, the polarity of the unknown
transformer is reversed. If the ammeter reads the difference of currents in the high-turn windings,
the polarity of the unknown transformer is as marked.
Several methods are available for calculating the accuracy of voltage transformers at
different burdens. These methods, utilizing winding impedances and core excitation
characteristics, are subject to some limitations and give results having less precision than
those methods that employ a combination of test and calculation.
The latter methods, using measured values of true ratio and phase angle at zero burden and one other
burden within the maximum standard burden rating of the transformer, yield results having a high degree of
precision. This is possible because both the ratio and the phase angle of a voltage transformer give
practically straight lines when plotted against secondary current at a given voltage, power factor, and
frequency.
54
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
10.1.2 Calculation of voltage transformer ratio and phase angle from known zero and rated
burden data
In this method, the true ratio and phase angle of a voltage transformer are known at both zero burden and
one other burden, either a rated standard burden or, more conveniently, a pure resistive or capacitive
burden, for a given voltage and frequency. At the same voltage and frequency, the accuracy for any other
) 1(4
burden and power factor may be calculated from the following equations:
Bo is the zero burden for which RCF and are known
Bt is the burden for which RCF and are known
Bc is the burden for which RCF and are to be calculated
θ t is the power factor angle of burden Bt (in radians)
θ C is the power factor angle of burden Bc (in radians)
RCFo is the transformer correction factor for burden Bo RCFt is the transformer correction factor for burden Bt RCFc
is the transformer correction factor for burden Bc
o is the transformer phase angle for burden Bo [in radians]
t is the transformer phase angle for burden Bt [in radians]
c is the transformer phase angle for burden Bc [in radians]
NOTE 2— is considered positive when the secondary voltage leads the primary voltage.
RCFd = RCFt – RCFo (15)
which equals difference between the transformer ratio correction factors for burdens Bt and Bo
c = t - o (16)
which equals the difference between the transformer phase angles burdens Bt and Bo ,in radians
NOTE 3—Multiply radians by 1000 to obtain milliradians (mrad). If minutes are desired, multiply by 3438.
NOTE 4—These equations provide an analytical determination of voltage transformer accuracy. Although they are
long, a simple computer or programmable calculator program can be written to perform the necessary calculations
quickly and accurately. Also, it has been shown that graphical solutions of these equations by means of special scaled
polar coordinate paper and a protractor are sufficiently accurate for most revenue-metering applications.
The equations for RCFc and γc above reduce to the following simpler form in the case where the burden for RCF and γ
are known to be at unity power factor.
where
)14(
These equations are approximations. Although they yield accurate results for many cases, the user should be aware that for large burdens
(e.g., Z or ZZ), intolerable errors may be introduced unless the volt-amperes of the known burden are equal to or greater than those of the unknown
burden, and the values for the known and the zero burdens are measured accurately. This problem is minimized for all cases if the magnitude of the
known burden is made nominally equal to the magnitude of the rated burden of the transformer under test.
55
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
For burdens not exceeding the burden for which RCF and are known, the foregoing calculations will
produce the same accuracy as would be obtained from the actual tests at the unknown burden. When the
calculations are used for determining performance at greater burdens, a lower accuracy will be obtained.
Consideration should be given to the effects of the increased heating due to the heavier burdens.
Voltage transformers operate at high magnetic flux densities in normal service. Although short-circuit
impedance measurements are necessarily made at low magnetic flux densities, the components of
impedance thus obtained are of value for the computation of transformer ratio and phase angle. The short-
circuit characteristics are also of value in selection of fuses.
The short-circuit impedance can be measured by the wattmeter, voltmeter, ammeter method.
The wattmeter, voltmeter, ammeter method is shown in Figure 24. The measured values shall be corrected
for instrument burden, if the analog wattmeter and voltmeter with low input impedance are used.
NOTE—It is recommended that the low-voltage winding be excited and the high-voltage winding be short-circuited
10.3 Polarity
To determine the polarity of voltage transformers using this method, do the following:
a) Connect the high-turn windings of the two transformers in parallel, as shown in Figure 25, by
connecting H1 of the known transformer to H1 of the unknown transformer and H2 of the known
transformer to H2 of the unknown transformer.
b) Connect the low-turn windings through a voltmeter, as shown in Figure 25 by connecting X1 of the
known transformer to X1 of the unknown transformer and X2 of the known transformer to one
voltmeter terminal and X2 of the unknown transformer to the other voltmeter terminal.
56
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
d) If the voltmeter reads zero, the polarity of the unknown transformer is as marked. If the voltmeter
reads the sum of the voltages of the low-turn windings, the polarity of the unknown transformer is
reversed.
WARNING
The test to demonstrate the short-time mechanical current rating of a current transformer shall be made by
subjecting the current transformer, with the secondary winding short-circuited; to a fully asymmetrical
short-circuit current of the duration of at least six cycles. The magnitude of the first asymmetrical peak
current shall be 2.7 times the thermal short-time current rating with the other peaks decreasing in
magnitude. This test may be combined with the thermal short-time test as long as the first peak satisfies the
mechanical rating and the remaining peak values are not less than the thermal rating for the duration of the
test.
The test to demonstrate the mechanical short-circuit capability of a voltage transformer shall be made with
rated voltage maintained on the primary for 1 s with the secondary terminals short-circuited. The test shall
be performed with the secondary windings paralleled if multiple secondary windings are present and by
short-circuiting the taps that result in the highest current. As an alternative, the test could be performed by
short-circuiting the primary winding and applying the rated secondary voltage for 1 s. The test shall be
performed with the secondary windings paralleled and by applying the voltage between the taps that result
in the highest current.
The calculation of temperature rise of a winding under short-time conditions is based on the assumption
57
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
that heating is adiabatic, i.e., that all of the energy developed in the winding during the period of the short
circuit (5 s or less) is stored as heat in the winding.
It is also assumed that the starting temperature of the winding when the short circuit occurs is the maximum
hottest-spot temperature of the winding at 30 °C ambient temperature under continuous loading at (1) the
continuous thermal current rating for a current transformer or (2) the maximum rated standard burden and
110% of rated voltage for a voltage transformer. Where this hottest-spot winding temperature is not
established by test, the limits of hottest-spot temperature rise (specified in Table 4) for 30 °C ambient shall
be used.
The calculated maximum temperature attained by the winding during the short circuit shall not exceed the
limits specified in 6.6.2 for a current transformer or in Clause 7 for a voltage transformer.
The general equation of winding temperature under short-circuit conditions is most conveniently expressed
and used as the current density that will produce the maximum permissible temperature in the winding
under the conditions specified above. Thus,
where
I is the short-circuit current, in amperes
A is the conductor cross section in centimeters squared
C is the average thermal capacitance per unit volume, in wattseconds/(degrees Celsius ×centimeters
cubed)
ρ20 is the specific resistance at 20 °C in ohm-cm
t is the duration of short circuit, in seconds
T equals 234.5 °C for copper
equals 225 °C for EC aluminum
θs is the starting temperature, in degrees Celsius
θm is the maximum temperature, in degrees Celsius
K is the ratio of all stray conductor loss to the dc I2R loss of the winding at the starting temperature, θs
ln is the natural logarithm.
This general equation may be simplified for most practical applications, since short-time thermal ratings are
based on a short-circuit duration of 1 s, and except for large current transformer primary bars, K is usually
negligible.
For copper (100% IACS):
ρ20 = 1.725 x 10-6 Ω-cm
C = 3.575 Ws/C° x cm 3)
T = 234.5 °C
and, for the above conditions,
58
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
If θm is taken as 250 °C for copper and as 200 °C for EC aluminum (see 6.6.2), and if θs is taken as 95 °C
for 55 °C rise types, 110 °C for 65 °C rise types, and 140 °C for 80 °C rise types (see Table 4), then:
For copper:
I/A = 14 260 A/ cm2 for 55° C rise types
I/A = 13 420 A/cm2 for 65 °C rise types
I/A = 11 660 A/ cm2 for 80 °C rise types.
For aluminum:
I/A = 8110 A/ cm2 for 55 °C rise types
I/A = 7430 A/ cm2 for 65 °C rise types
I/A = 5940 A/ cm2 for 80 °C rise types
11.2 Temperature rise tests
11.2.1 General
All temperature rise tests shall be made under the normal conditions of the means, or method, of cooling.
All temperature rise tests shall be made with the transformer under test in the orientation and under the
conditions for which it is designed to operate. If the transformer is designed for use in any one of several
orientations, or under several possible conditions, the test shall be made in the orientation and condition
that is expected to result in the greatest temperature rise.
The transformer shall be mounted in a normal manner. Mounted in a normal manner shall be interpreted to
mean that the heat dissipation due to conduction and radiation shall not be substantially influenced by
abnormal heat transfer to, or from, surrounding objects. Transformers shall be completely assembled with
normal finish, and if oil-filled, they shall be filled to the recommended level.
Temperature rise tests shall be made in an area as with a wind speed of 0.5 m/s or less.
The design shall be considered as having met the requirements of 4.6 if the temperature rise is in
accordance with Table 4 and terminal temperature rise is in accordance with Table 5.
The ambient temperature shall be the temperature of the air surrounding the transformer under test.
The ambient temperature shall be not less than 10 °C nor more than 40 °C during a temperature rise test.
The preferred method of measuring the ambient temperature is by using an ideal identical transformer, or
one having similar thermal-time characteristics, and measuring the temperature by the resistance method.
The idle transformer shall be located so as to respond to ambient temperature changes in the same manner
as the transformer under test (see 8.4.3).
When an identical transformer is not available, the temperature of the cooling air shall be determined from
the average of the readings of several thermometers or thermocouples (one may be used for small
transformers) placed around and approximately at the same level as the center of the maximum vertical
heat-dissipating surface of the transformer, at a horizontal distance adequate to prevent the transformer
under test from influencing the readings (1 m to 2 m is usually sufficient).
To reduce to a minimum the errors due to time lag between the temperature of the transformers and the
variations in the ambient temperature, the thermocouples, or thermometers, shall be placed in suitable
containers and shall have such proportions as will require not less than 2 h for the indicated temperature
within the container to change 6.3 °C if suddenly placed in air that has a temperature 10 °C higher, or
lower, than the previous steady-state indicated temperature within the container.
59
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
When the ambient temperature, based on the average readings of the thermometers or thermocouples
during one observation period, is not 30 °C, the winding losses will not be the same as the values that
would have been obtained at 30 °C ambient conditions. If the temperature rise values obtained are close to
the limiting values for the insulation used in the transformer, a correction shall be applied to that part of the
temperature rise due to the winding losses.
The corrected temperature rise for current transformers shall be obtained by multiplying the total measured
temperature rise by the applicable factor [as shown in Equation (24) and Equation (25)].
where
θa is the ambient temperature at the termination of the temperature rise test
The temperature rise of voltage transformers depends on both the winding losses and the core losses. Only
that part of the temperature rise due to the winding losses is affected by the ambient temperature, as the
core losses are not appreciably changed over the temperature range in which instrument transformers
normally operate.
The part of the temperature rise due to the winding losses shall be corrected by using the applicable factor
covered above. To obtain the part of the temperature rise due to winding losses, a temperature rise test shall
be made with the voltage transformer secondary winding open-circuited and the values obtained subtracted
from the temperature rise values that were obtained under the corresponding condition specified by 13.2.
Provision shall be made to measure the surface temperature of all metal parts surrounding, or adjacent to,
the outlet leads or terminals carrying large currents.
When possible, the top liquid temperature of oil-filled transformers shall be measured by a thermocouple or
spirit thermometer immersed to approximately 5 cm below the top liquid surface.
The bulbs of the spirit thermometer or other temperature-reading means used for taking temperatures of the
transformer surfaces in air shall be covered by small felt pads, or the equivalent, cemented to the
transformer. If thermocouples are used, the leads shall be so arranged that excessive heat is not conducted
to or from the junction.
The ultimate average temperature rise of the windings shall be determined by the resistance method
whenever practical.
To avoid errors due to the time required for the bridge current to become constant, the time required shall
be determined during the measurement of the winding resistance reference temperature. An equal or
slightly longer time shall be allowed when making ultimate and cooling rate temperature measurements.
Measurements of temperature rise by the resistance method shall not include contact resistances. This may
be accomplished by using a four wire method.
The temperature rise shall be considered constant when all temperatures that can be measured without
shutdown at intervals of not less than 30 min show three consecutive readings within 1 °C. Temperature
rise tests shall not be made by any method that requires shutting off the power for more than 2 min in any 2
hours to establish that a constant temperature has been reached.
A correction shall be made for the cooling that occurs from the time that the power is shut off to the time
that the hot resistance is measured.
The recommended method of determining the temperature of the winding at the time of shutdown shall be
by measuring the resistance of the windings, as the transformer cools, immediately after shutdown and
extrapolating to the time of shutdown. At least four measurements shall be made at intervals of not more
than 3 min but no less than the time required for the measuring current to stabilize. If the current does not
exceed 15% of the rated current of the winding, it may be maintained during the entire period.
(26)
(27
where
T is for copper equal to 234.5
T is for EC aluminum equal to 225
θt is the temperature in degrees Celsius corresponding to the resistance of the winding at time of
shutdown
θo is the temperature in degrees Celsius corresponding to the reference resistance of the winding
Rt is the resistance of the winding at time of shutdown
Ro is the reference resistance of the winding
The dc resistance measuring equipment shall have a minimum resolution of three significant digits
following the first significant digit.
The temperature rise is the corrected total temperature minus the ambient temperature at the time the
observations were made.
When tests are made at an altitude not exceeding 1000 m above sea level, no altitude correction shall be
applied to the temperature rise.
When tests are made at an altitude that is more than 1000 m above sea level, the temperature rise shall be corrected to 30
°C conditions by the following method:
(28)
where
θr is the temperature rise with standard conditions
θm is the measured temperature rise corrected to 30 °C conditions
h is the altitude in meters above sea level
11.3 Impulse tests
These tests consist of applying in the following order one reduced full wave, one full wave, two chopped
waves, and two full waves.
61
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
The wave to be used shall consist of a nominal 1.2 × 50 µs wave. Either, but not both, positive or negative
waves may be used. Waves of negative polarity for oil-filled apparatus, and of positive polarity for dry-type
or compound-filled apparatus, are recommended and shall be used unless otherwise specified.
The voltage shall be measured and the waveform traces scaled as specified in IEEE Std 4.
For this test, the voltage wave shall have a peak value of between 50% and 70% of the full-wave peak
given in Table 2.
For this test, the applied voltage wave shall be chopped by a suitable air gap. It shall have a peak value and
time to flashover in accordance with Table 2.
To avoid recovery of insulation strength if failure has occurred during a previous impulse, the time interval
between the application of the last chopped wave and the final full wave should be minimized and
preferably should not exceed 10 min.
For this test, the voltage wave shall have a peak value in accordance with Table 2, and no flashover of the
transformer under test or test gap shall occur.
The time interval between application of the last chopped wave and the final full wave shall be minimized
to avoid recovery of insulation strength if a failure has occurred prior to the final full wave.
All impulses applied to a transformer shall be recorded if their peak values exceed 40% of the peak of the
full-wave value given in Table 2.
When reports require waveform traces, those of the first reduced full wave, the first full wave, the last two
chopped waves, and the last full wave of voltage shall represent a record of the successful applications of
the impulse test to the transformer.
The impulse voltage shall be applied to all primary leads simultaneously with the secondary windings
short-circuited and grounded.
The specified test voltage shall be applied to each primary terminal. In testing transformers equipped with
fuses, the fuses should be short-circuited. Test voltages shall be applied to the polarity terminal of the
high-voltage winding with the opposite lead grounded and to the nonpolarity terminal with the polarity lead
grounded.
One terminal of the winding under test shall be grounded directly or through a small resistance if current
measurements are to be made. One terminal of each of the other windings may be grounded directly or
through a resistor. It is desirable that the voltage on ungrounded terminals of a winding not under test
should not exceed 80% of the full-wave voltage for its BIL rating.
In some cases the inductance of the winding is so low that the desired voltage magnitude and duration of
the 50% point on the tail of the wave cannot be obtained with available equipment. Low-inductance
windings may be tested by inserting a resistor of not more than 500 in the grounded end of the winding.
In all such cases, shorter waves may be used (for additional information, see 10.3.1.1 of IEEE
62
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Std C57.12.90).
Any unexplained differences between the first 100% full wave and the final full wave detected by
superimposing the two voltage waveform traces, or any such differences observed by comparing the
chopped waves to each other and to the full wave up to the time of flashover, are indications of failure.
Deviations may be caused by conditions in the test circuit external to the transformer or by protective
devices and should be fully investigated.
Smoke bubbles rising through the liquid in the transformer are definite evidence of failure. Clear bubbles
may or may not be evidence of trouble; they may be due to entrapped air. They should be investigated by
repeating the test, or by reprocessing the transformer and repeating the test to determine whether a failure
has occurred.
In making the chopped-wave test, failure of the chopping gap, or any external part, to flashover, although
the voltage waveform traces show a chopped wave, is a definite indication of a flashover either within the
transformer or in the test circuit.
Unusual noise within the transformer at the instant of applying the impulse is an indication of trouble.
For instrument transformers with capacitive graded insulation, current waveform traces comparison is
mandatory. When the ground current method of detection is used, impulse current in the grounded end of
the winding tested is measured. Any unexplained differences detected by superimposing the two current
waveform traces of the first 100% full wave and last full wave tests may be an indication of failure.
Deviations in the current wave shapes may also be caused by conditions in the test circuit external to the
transformers, or by built-in protective devices, and should be investigated fully. It is difficult to shield the
measuring circuit completely from the influence of the high voltage of the impulse generator, and some
stray voltages are frequently picked up that may produce an erratic record for the first 1 µs or 2 µs. Such
influences, if they occur at the start of the current wave, should be disregarded. The ground current method
of detection is not applicable for use with chopped-wave tests.
The pre-stress and prescribed extinction voltages shall be in accordance with Table 21 or 8.6.2 depending
on voltage rating.
Before the test, the setup shall be calibrated for the partial discharge measurement of 10 pC for oil-filled or
gas-filled, and 50 pC for dry-type instrument transformers. The measuring method shall be in accordance
with IEC 60270.
If necessary, external electrodes may be used for the primary terminals and the ground of the transformer. As
the test voltage is increased, the voltage at which the partial discharge intensity of 10 pC for oil-filled or
gas-filled, and 50 pC for dry-type instrument transformers is detected shall be recorded (i.e., the partial
discharge inception voltage). The test voltage shall then be increased until it reaches the prestress voltage
level which shall be maintained for the duration in accordance with Table 20. Subsequently the test voltage
) 15
(
shall be reduced to the prescribed extinction voltage level and then maintained for a duration of 30 s
within which the partial discharge intensity shall be measured. The actual partial discharge extinction
voltage shall be recorded during the reduction from prestress voltage to the prescribed extinction voltage.
If the partial discharge intensity exceeds the limit of 10 pC for oil-filled or gas-filled, and 50 pC for dry-
type instrument transformers, the test may be extended, at the manufacturer’s discretion, by up to 10 min at
)15(
The partial discharge intensity may be measured as the test voltage is reduced from the power frequency withstand voltage level.
63
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
the prescribed extinction voltage level. The test shall be terminated if the measured partial discharge
intensity has decreased to less than or equal to 10 pC for oil-filled or gas-filled, and 50 pC for dry-type
instrument transformers.
The design shall be considered as having met the requirements if the following are true:
a) No external disruptive discharge or collapse of voltage is observed during the test, and
b) The partial discharge intensity measured at the prescribed extinction voltage level is equal to or less
) 1(6
than 10 pC for oil-filled or gas-filled, and 50 pC for dry-type instrument transformers, and
c) No internal insulation failure is found by the capacitance and dissipation factor measurement.
d) For transformers with a rated voltage less than 10 kV, for dry type molded transformers without
capacitive graded insulation or for bushing current transformers these capacitance and dissipation
factor requirements do not apply.
The test shall be performed only on transformer designs of a nominal system voltage of 345 kV and above.
The voltage shall be applied between the primary terminal and the ground terminal of the transformer. All
The preparation of the transformer and wetting procedure shall be in accordance with ‘Wet Tests’ of IEEE
Std 4. The precipitation conditions shall be as described under the “Standard test procedure” as outlined in
Table 3 of the same standard. Air density correction shall be done in accordance with 13.2 of IEEE Std 4-
2013.
The voltage waveshape shall be 250 µs ± 20% × 2500 µs ± 60% (or [200 – 300] µs × [1000 – 4000] µs)
standard wave-shape. The test voltage shall be in accordance with Table 2. The applied wave shall be at
positive polarity only.
a) One reduced wave with 50% to 70% of rated value provided in Table 2, and
b) Fifteen full waves
No deviation is detected between the reduced wave and full wave waveform traces and/or between
full wave waveform traces
NOTE—It may happen that small deviations are observed between reduced wave and full wave waveform traces. If
this is the case, comparison between the first and other full wave waveform traces may be used to verify that the
deviations observed when using the reduced wave waveform traces are solely caused by the different voltage level
and corresponding non linearities in the test circuit and/or measuring circuit.
)16(
It is recommended that the actual measured partial discharge extinction voltage be
recorded.
64
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
No internal insulation failure is found with the capacitance and dissipation factor measurement
The test shall be performed only on transformers of a nominal system voltage of 230 kV and below.
The preparation of the transformer and wetting procedure shall be in accordance with IEEE Std 4. The
precipitation conditions shall be as described under the “Standard test procedure” for wet tests. Air density
correction shall be done in accordance with 13.2 of IEEE Std 4-2013.
b) No internal insulation failure is found with the capacitance and dissipation factor measurement
A three–terminal capacitance and dissipation factor measurement in the grounded specimen mode and at a
voltage of 1.0 kV (rms) or lower shall be performed to determine the following:
For gas-filled transformer the test may be performed at any setting of the gas pressure.
The presence of the ground shield shall be indicated if the measured capacitances are in accordance with Equation (29).
The transformer shall be considered as having met the requirements if the measured parameters are within
±10% of the value determined with the above expression.
The short-time thermal rating assigned to a current transformer shall be such that the permissible current density, as
determined by Equation (21), Equation (22), or Equation (23) as applicable, will not be exceeded in any winding.
For current transformers, the major portion of the stray conductor loss, if any, is normally in the primary
winding, and K, the ratio of stray conductor loss to I2R loss, should be applied to the calculations of the
temperature rise in the primary winding only. The value may be determined from the equation:
(30)
where
I 2 x R is the total dc loss for primary and secondary windings
Ip 2 x R is the dc loss for primary winding only
65
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
For copper:
(31)
For EC aluminum:
(32)
For the calculation of permissible current density in the secondary winding, K may be considered
negligible and the simplified equations at the end of 11.1.2 may be used.
In a current transformer, under the conditions prescribed for the calculation of temperature rise, saturation
of the core may cause the actual secondary current to be less than that indicated by the marked ratio of the
transformer.
Where actual secondary current under the overload condition has been established by test or calculation,
the actual secondary current density may be used rather than that indicated by the marked ratio.
Tests on current transformers shall be made at maximum-rated continuous current and at rated frequency.
All terminals and joints shall be clean and tight and shall provide good electrical contact.
Current transformers that have been magnetized by measuring the resistance of the winding shall be
demagnetized after the completion of temperature rise tests. (The method of demagnetizing is covered in
9.2.)
The current carrying conductors supplying the instrument transformer shall not act as a heat source or a
heat sink. In order to fulfill this requirement, the temperature of the current carrying conductors at a
distance of 1 m from the transformer primary terminals shall not differ by more than ±5°C from that
measured on the transformer terminals.
In making temperature tests on window-type current transformers, the primary conductor used in the test
shall have a continuous-current capacity in the configuration used and according to recognized authority,
not less than the test current. If more than one primary turn is used, the clearance between the turns and the
transformer body around the outside shall be at least 30 cm. For 55 °C or 65 °C rise type transformers, the
continuous-current capacity of the primary bus shall be based on a temperature rise of 50 °C or less, and the
continuous-current capacity of the primary cable shall be based on a maximum conductor temperature of
75 °C.
The inter-turn overvoltage test shall be performed in accordance with one of the following procedures.
If not otherwise agreed, the choice of the procedure is left to the manufacturer.
Procedure A: with the secondary windings connected to a high impedance peak-reading voltmeter,
66
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
gradually increase the substantially sinusoidal primary current at a rated frequency from zero to the
maximum continuous rated current, or until the peak voltage reaches 3500 V, whichever occurs first.
Maintain the primary current for 60 s.
Procedure B: with the primary winding open-circuited, the prescribed test voltage (at some suitable
frequency) shall be applied for 60 s to the terminals of secondary winding, providing that the rms. value of
the secondary current does not exceed the rated secondary current (or rated extended current).
The value of the test frequency shall be not greater than 1000 Hz.
At this frequency, if the voltage value achieved at the rated secondary current (or rated extended current) is
lower than 3500 V peak, the obtained voltage is to be regarded as the test voltage.
When the frequency exceeds twice the rated frequency, the duration of the test may be reduced from 60 s as
shown in Equation (33):
(33)
The inter-turn overvoltage test is not a test carried out to verify the suitability of a current transformer to
operate with the secondary winding open-circuited. Current transformers should not be operated with the
secondary winding open-circuited because of the potentially dangerous overvoltage and overheating that
can occur.
To demonstrate the ability of a voltage transformer to meet the temperature limitations of 7.7, the
short-circuit current in each winding is calculated for the condition of rated voltage applied to the primary
terminals, and the secondary winding short-circuited at its terminals. The current density I/A is then
calculated by dividing the short-circuit current by the cross section of the conductor. The value of current
density so obtained for each winding shall not exceed the applicable value calculated using the equations at
the end of 11.1.2, the stray conductor loss ratio K being considered negligible for voltage transformers.
For the purpose of calculating the short-circuit current from the above discussion, the reactance X, and the
resistance R, may be determined by any of the methods described in 8.2, but the resistance shall be
corrected to a temperature that is the average of the initial and maximum temperatures. For any winding:
where
I is the short-circuit current
V is the rated voltage of the winding
X is the reactance, referred to that winding
R is the resistance, referred to that winding at the average temperature
θa is the ambient temperature in °C
θm is the maximum temperature in °C
The value of R may be determined from the resistance Ra at a temperature θa by Equation (34) and
Equation (35).
For copper:
(34)
67
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
For EC aluminum:
(35)
In a voltage transformer under short-circuit conditions, the current, and therefore the current density, will
decrease during the short circuit due to the change of resistance with the temperature of the winding. The
value of the short-circuit current, as determined by the above paragraph, therefore represents an average
value during the short-circuit period. However, this approximation introduces negligible error in the
calculation of temperature rise within the prescribed limits.
Temperature rise tests shall be made at rated frequency. The power factor of the burden used during
temperature rise tests is not important.
Temperature rise tests at thermal burden rating shall be made at rated primary voltage.
Temperature rise tests, for normal operating conditions, shall be made at 110% rated primary voltage and
with the maximum standard burden for which an accuracy class is published.
68
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Annex A
(informative)
Bibliography
Bibliographical references are resources that provide additional or helpful material but do not need to be
understood or used to implement this standard. Reference to these resources is made for informational use
only.
[B1] Arnold, A. H. M., “Current-transformer testing,” Journal of the IEE, vol. 74, pp. 424444, 1934.
[B2] Arnold, A. H. M., “Precision testing of current transformers,” Journal of the IEE, vol. 68,
pp. 898905, 1930.
[B3] ASTM D117-1996, Standard Guide for Sampling, Test Methods, Specifications, and Guide for
Electrical Insulation Oils of Petroleum Origin.
[B4] Bousman, H. W., and Ten Broeck, R. L., “A capacitance bridge for determining the ratio and phase
angle of potential transformers,” AIEE Transactions, vol. 62, pp. 541545, Aug. 1943.
[B5] Brownlee, A. L., “A primary method of measuring the ratio and phase angle of current
transformers,” AIEE Transactions, vol. 69, part 1, pp. 459460, 1950.
[B6] Buchanan, J. H., “Design, construction, and testing of voltage transformers,” Journal of the IEE, vol.
78, pp. 292316, Mar. 1936.
[B7] Clothier, W. K., and Medina, L., “The absolute calibration of voltage transformers,” Proceedings of
the IEE, vol. 104A, pp. 204214, June 1957.
[B8] Glynne, A., “The use of a simple AC potentiometer for the precision testing of instrument
transformers,” Journal of the IEE, part 11, no. 21, pp. 177181, June 1944.
[B9] Harris, F. K., Electrical Measurements. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1952.
[B10] Harris, F. K., et al., “An international comparison of voltage-transformer calibrations to 350 kV,”
IEEE Transactions on Communication and Electronics, vol. 83, pp. 1319, Jan. 1964.
[B11] IEEE Std C57.98™, IEEE Guide for Transformer Impulse Tests.
[B12] Kusters, N. L., and Moore, W. J. M., “The compensated current comparator: A new reference
standard for current-transformer calibrations in industry,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and
Measurement, vol. IM-13, pp. 107114, June/Sept. 1964.
[B13] Kusters, N. L., and Petersons, O., “A transformer-ratio-arm bridge for high-voltage capacitance
measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Communications and Electronics, no. 69, pp. 606611, Nov. 1963.
[B14] Kusters, N. L., “The precise measurement of current ratios,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation
and Measurement, vol. IM-13, pp. 197209, Dec. 1964.
[B15] Miljanic, P. N., Kusters, N. L., and Moore, W. J. M., “The application of current comparators to the
calibration of current transformers at ratios up to 36 000/5 amperes,” IEEE Transactions on
Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. IM-17, pp. 196203, Sept. 1968.
[B16] Petersons, O., and Anderson, W. E., “A wide-range high-voltage capacitance bridge with one ppm
accuracy,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. IM-24, no. 4, pp. 336344, Dec.
69
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
1975.
[B17] Petersons, O., “A self-balancing current comparator,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and
Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. IM-13, no. 4, pp. 216224, Dec. 1964.
[B19] Silsbee, F. B., “A shielded resistor for voltage transformer testing,” NBS Scientific Papers, vol. 20,
pp. 489514, 1926.
[B20] Silsbee, F. B., Smith, R. L., Forman, N. L., and Park, J. H., “Equipment for testing current
transformers,” NBS Journal of Research, vol. 11, pp. 93122, July 1933.
[B21] Souders, T. M., “A wide range current comparator system for calibrating current transformers,”
IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-90, no. 1, pp. 318323, Jan./Feb. 1971.
[B22] Sze, W. C., “Comparators for voltage transformer calibrations at NBS,” NBS Journal of Research,
part C, Engineering and Instrumentation, vol. 69C, no. 4, Oct./Dec. 1965.
[B23] Zinn, E., “Fundamentale Bestimmung der Fehler von Hochstspannungswandlern durch ein
Summierverfahren mittels Teilern aus Kapazitat und Widerstand,” Archiv fur Electrotechnik, vol. 44, pp.
147156, 19581960.
)17(
Useful material covering instrument transformers
[B24] AIEE Committee on Protective Devices, Current Transformer Subcommittee, “Current- and
potential-transformer standardization,” AIEE Transactions, vol. 61, pp. 698706, Sept. 1942.
[B25] ANSI/NCSL Z540.3, Requirements for the Calibration of Measuring and Testing Equipment.
[B26] Arnold, A. H. M., “Dielectric admittances in current transformers,” Proceedings of the IEE, vol. 97,
part II, pp. 692698, 1950.
[B27] Arnold, A. H. M., “The effect of capacitance on the design of torodial current transformers,”
Proceedings of the IEE, vol. 97, part II, no. 60, pp. 797808, Dec. 1950.
[B28] Arnold, A. H. M., “Leakage phenomena in ring-type current transformers,” Journal of the IEE, vol.
74, pp. 413-423, 1934.
[B29] Davis, R., “The design and construction of a shielded resistor for high voltages,” Journal of the IEE,
vol. 79, pp. 10281034, 1931.
[B30] Dunfee, B. L., and Moore, W. J. M., “An international comparison of current-ratio standards at audio
frequencies,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. IM-14, pp. 172177, Dec.
1965.
[B31] Foley, A. H., “A direct reading high-voltage capacitance bridge,” AIEE Transactions, vol. 69, part
II, pp. 692698, 1950.
[B32] Hague, B., Instrument TransformersTheir Theory, Characteristics and Testing. London: Sir Isaac
)17(
Bibliographic references [B24] to [B49] constitute a sample of the large amount of useful material covering instrument transformers that is available. These
references are given for the convenience of obtaining more detailed information and a historical perspective on the subject matter covered in this standard
70
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
[B34] IEEE Std C37.235™, IEEE Guide for the Application of Rogowski Coils Used for Protective
Relaying Purposes.
[B35] ISO/IEC 17025:2005, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration
Laboratories.
[B36] Kusters, N. L. and Moore, W. J. M., “The development and performance of current comparators for
audio frequencies,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. IM-14, pp. 178198,
Dec. 1965.
[B37] McGregor, M. C., et al., “New apparatus at the National Bureau of Standards for absolute
capacitance measurement,” IRE Transactions on Instrumentation, vol. I-7, nos. 3 and 4, pp. 253261, Dec.
1958.
[B38] Miljanic, P. N., “Capacitive error in current comparators,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation
and Measurement, vol. IM-13, pp. 210216, Dec. 1964.
[B41] Park, J. H., “Accuracy of high-range current transformers,” NBS Journal of Research, vol. 14,
pp. 367392, 1935.
[B42] Pfuntner, R. A., “The accuracy of current transformers adjacent to high-current buses,” AIEE
Transactions, vol. 70, part II, pp. 16561662, 1951.
[B43] Settles, J. L., Farber, W. R., and Conner, E. E., “The analytical and graphical determination of
complete potential transformer characteristics,” AIEE Transactions, part III, pp. 12131219, 1960.
[B44] Silsbee, F. B., “A study of the inductance of four terminal resistance standards,” United States
[B45] Silsbee, F. B., “Notes on the design of four terminal resistance standard for alternating currents,”
NBS Journal of Research, vol. 4, pp. 73107, Jan. 1930.
[B46] Silsbee, F. B., “Precautions against stray magnetic fields in measurements with large alternating
currents,” AIEE Transactions, vol. 48, pp. 13011306, Oct. 1929.
[B47] Weller, C. T., “A 132 kV shielded potentiometer for determining the accuracy of potential
transformers,” AIEE Transactions, vol. 48, pp. 790807, July 1929.
[B48] Woods, C. A., Jr., and Bottonari, S. A., “Overcurrent performance of bushing-type current
transformers,” AIEE Transactions, vol. 59, pp. 554560, Sept. 1940.
[B49] Zocholl, S. E., Analyzing and applying current transformers, Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories,
Inc., 2004.
)18(
IEEE publications are available from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA (http://standards/ieee.org/)
71
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
Annex B
(normative)
Bushing-type current transformer (BCT) and special purpose window type current
transformers
B.1 Introduction
Over the years there has been much ambiguity in the treatment of BCTs and how they apply to the
guidelines set forth in this standard. It is the purpose of this annex to define the ratings, selection and test
requirements for BCTs.
B.2 Scope
This annex will cover BCTs as they apply to power transformers, step-voltage regulators, power circuit
breakers, isolated phase bus compartments, generators, and other equipment where they might be used.
This shall apply to any window-type current transformer rated 0.6 kV or less, intended to rely on, in
addition to its own insulation, any combination of conductor insulation and air, oil or gas medium, as a
complete insulation system satisfying the equipment dielectric requirements.
For the purpose of this annex, a BCT is a window-type current transformer wound on a toroidal core with
uniformly distributed windings having negligible leakage reactance (see Figure B.1). It shall have a
nominal voltage rating of 0.6 kV having no BIL rating (unless otherwise stated by the manufacturer). The
primary winding is typically in the form of a lead wire, cable, bus bar, or terminal or wall bushing. This
conductor is typically a single turn centrally located in the window (see The IEEE Standards Dictionary
Online).
Metering performance shall be in accordance with 6.3 and relaying performance shall be in accordance
with 6.4. It is permissible to have dual ratings that are one having both relaying and metering performance
simultaneously.
When used in control functions such as for temperature indication (hot spot), load tap changing (LTC) or
automatic voltage regulation (AVR), neither metering nor relaying class designations apply. The ratio may
be selected by the full load current and may not necessarily coordinate with a standard current ratio. An
accuracy limit of ±1% shall be used at rated current with a 50 VA burden. There will be no limit on phase
error. Verification at 100% rated current at rated burden is required. A direct or indirect test (by composite
72
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
NOTE—Step-voltage regulators are nominally 0.2 A secondary with 3.5 VA burden and are covered in IEEE
Std C57.15. If BCTs are used with 5A secondary and assigned conventional metering or protection ratings, then this
annex shall apply.
For indication purposes with ammeters, class 1.2 or higher shall be used with no limit on phase error.
Verification at 100% rated current at rated burden is required. A direct or indirect test (by composite error
measurement) may be used at the discretion of the manufacturer.
In the case of metering class 0.6 or better, if the BCT is a dual ratio, both taps shall have a defined metering
accuracy, and tested per Figure 7.
It is not desirable to have a metering class for a multi-ratio winding with more than two available ratios
unless all available ratios have defined accuracy classes. The accuracy performance will worsen and the
burden may decrease as the ratio decreases. If none are specified the manufacturer shall verify only the
defined tap per Figure 7, and all other ratios shall have no guarantees of performance. If other ratios are
defined the manufacture shall verify performance of the lowest ratio with the highest accuracy class and
burden. Performing tests at other ratios is subject to agreement between the producer and the user.
The ambient temperature for which the basis of continuous duty is assigned shall be determined by its
application as shown in Table B.1. The reference ambient temperature shall be indicated on the BCT
nameplate if other than 30 °C.
The temperature class of the insulation system for determining the maximum allowable rise shall be, as a
minimum, Class 105 °C. If the insulation system is greater than Class 105 °C as shown in Table B.2, then it
shall be stated on the BCT nameplate.
73
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
All major insulation components used throughout the BCT assembly shall be thermally coordinated with its
temperature class per Table B.2, and suitable for the environment it will be subjected to as indicated in
Table B.1.
For the purpose of determining temperature rise in a BCT, there will be no consideration of hot spot
allowance. The secondary turns are usually evenly distributed and the primary is typically a single
conductor passing through the BCT window with little to no contribution of heat to the secondary winding.
The limit of allowable temperature rise shall simply be the difference of the insulation class and the
ambient temperature rating.
Maximum allowable Temperature Rise, ΔT = Insulation Class - Ambient Temperature Rating (B.1)
Maximum
allowable winding Maximum allowable Maximum allowable
Maximum working Insulation
rise @ 90 °C winding rise @ 55 °C winding rise @ 30 °C
temperature (°C) class
average ambient average ambient average ambient
designation
(°C) (°C) (°C)
If the maximum temperature rise is not the difference between the insulation class and ambient temperature
rating, then it shall be conveyed to the end user on the BCT nameplate. It shall also be stated on published
characteristic curves.
For example:
a) If the rated ambient temperature is 95 °C and the insulation is Class 105, the rise is 10 °C; only the
ambient temperature needs to be stated.
b) If the rated ambient temperature is 75 °C, the insulation is Class 105, and the rise is 30 °C; only the
ambient temperature needs to be stated.
c) If the rated ambient temperature is 55 °C and the insulation is Class 130, but the rise is only 30 °C,
then all three items shall be stated.
For the purpose of this annex all terms relating to the maximum continuous duty of a BCT shall be referred
to as RF. That will include such terms as thermal RF (TRF), continuous thermal RF (CTRF), continuous
current RF (CCRF), and the like.
The maximum current ratio should be based upon the maximum continuous current rating of the bushing or
74
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
conductor it is being used on, including any short-time overload conditions that may affect its temperature
rise. In some cases the current ratio may be selected to 125% of the maximum rated current, or to the next
standard ratio. The assigned RF times the rated primary current shall be an absolute limit in accordance
with Table B.1.
When selecting a current ratio higher than the bushing current rating, the RF can be set to match the
bushing rating. For example, a GSU transformer with a 1200 A rated bushing and a 12 000:5 CT ratio to
match upstream CTs, the RF could be stated as 0.1.
In the case of a multi-ratio winding, unless otherwise stated, the RF assigned shall apply to all available
taps.
When using low ratio CTs or tap connections of a multi-ratio CT on bushings or conductors of much higher
ampacity, the apparatus in which the CT is being installed shall be properly de-rated in accordance with the
CT ratio ratings.
Rating factors shall be assigned in accordance with 6.5 unless agreed upon by the manufacturer and end
customer.
The use of the de-rating chart (Figure 1) is not applicable for BCTs. In the case of lower ambient
temperatures it should not be assumed that the RF can increase. Such considerations shall be discussed with
the BCT manufacturer.
When using low ratio CTs or tap connections of a multi-ratio CT on bushings or conductors of much higher
ampacity while intended to be used at lower currents, the apparatus in which the CT is being installed shall
be properly coordinated with the CT ratings.
NOTE—For high voltage power circuit breakers see NEMA SG-4, IEEE Std C37.04, and IEEE Std C37.010 for more
guidance.
Short-time ratings for BCTs shall be assigned as a multiple of rated current and shall apply to the maximum
current ratio unless otherwise stated.
Short-time thermal ratings may be calculated based on the cross-sectional area of magnet wire used in the
secondary winding per 11.1.2. This rating is given as a symmetrical rms value. To maintain alignment with
power circuit breaker ratings, short-time thermal ratings may be provided for three-second durations.
Mechanical short-time ratings of a BCT, for all practical purposes, may be considered unlimited, but in
reality is limited by the conductor it is installed upon. For this reason the short-time mechanical rating is
arbitrarily set to 2.7 times the calculated one-second short-time thermal rating, and is the peak value of the
first asymmetrical major loop.
The user shall keep in mind that these short-time ratings are not necessarily the same as those of the
primary conductor, which may have different limitations.
BCTs are typically mounted around bushing shanks along the ground plane and are seldom ever in direct
contact with the primary current carrying conductor. They may also be used in conjunction with air, oil or
gas to meet a higher dielectric level. For this reason they cannot be effectively tested to satisfy any applied
withstand and impulse level on their own. The qualification of the insulation system which includes the
BCT in its assembly shall be the responsibility of the equipment manufacturer, or based on successful
industry practices. By default a BCT would have a nominal voltage rating of 0.6 kV class with no BIL
rating, even though they are used on systems at much higher levels.
75
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
B.7 Construction
B.7.1 Polarity
The H1 polarity marking should be visible. This mark may be in the form of a stripe, dot, or letters. It may
also be denoted on the nameplate.
If secondary leads are provided they shall be identified by color, permanent markings on the lead wire
insulation, or some other acceptable means provided it cannot be easily removed.
Secondary leads shall be considered as an extension of the secondary winding and therefore are not part of
the total secondary burden. For application purposes, the manufacturer may provide the lead resistance, in
Ω/ft, separate from the winding resistance since they have no control as to how much may be removed
upon installation. This may typically be stated on the published characteristic curves.
All windings including turns between taps (when provided) shall be fully distributed about the core
periphery. Tap arrangements shall be in accordance with Table 11, or some derivative when applicable. In
the case of configurations not defined in Table 11, taps shall be specified by the end user, and all taps shall
be divisible by 5 as a minimum. No tap less than 5 turns shall be provided.
In the case of those BCTs used for control functions such as hot spot sensing, winding temperature
indicators, or load tap changers, some taps (if provided) may not be fully distributed as they are typically
small portions above and/or below the main winding, which shall be fully distributed.
B.7.4 Finish
BCTs are typically classified as indoor type. In application they are contained in an enclosure protecting
them from direct exposure to sunlight and weather elements. The insulation system used throughout the
BCT assembly shall be compatible with its insulation rating and the environment for which it will be used
in accordance with Table B.1.
This is a special type of BCT that has an insulation system protecting the BCT coil assembly from the
direct exposure of weather. They are externally mounted on a terminal bushing with adequate support.
They require no protective cover or housing. A unit of this construction may have a nominal BIL rating of
10 kV or higher, as defined by the manufacturer, and shall be stated on its nameplate. The protective
insulation shall be suitable for use in outdoor environments.
This is a special type of BCT that is designed specifically for use on generator terminal bushings or in
isolated phase compartments where high currents are present. These are typically constructed with higher
temperature class materials. Due to the nature of the application and magnitudes of operating current, this
construction may require means of shielding the secondary winding from the effects of external stray flux
from adjacent and return conductors.
B.7.5 Nameplates
The nameplate shall comply with 6.8 and may include the following information:
76
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
c) RF may include the rated ambient temperature, and temperature rise if applicable per B.4.3, i.e.,
1) RF 1.5 @ 55°C
Other requirements:
Information left off the nameplate due to available space or other reasons shall be communicated to the end
user either on the published characteristic curves, outline drawing, or some other official means acceptable
to the end user.
a) Induced voltage test (per 6.7.2 and 8.5.4). In the case of high current ratios where the exciting
voltage may well exceed 1600 V, the induced level shall be 2 times the saturation voltage or 3200
b) Turns verification. This test can be made with any suitable configuration or method provided that it
can distinguish ±1 turn from the nominal turns. The actual turns allowance shall be in compliance
with the accuracy class limits for relaying and/or metering class as assigned.
NOTE—This test may require inducing primary currents to very high magnitudes (>20 000A) which can lead
to difficulties obtaining 100% rated currents. These tests are normally performed in a laboratory environment
that require special equipment and setup. If by type test and/or calculations it can be successfully demonstrated
to meet the accuracy requirements, then lower measuring levels for compliance may be performed provided
they are not less than 50% rated current, they are properly reported, and they are mutually agreed upon
between manufacturer and end user.
1) In the case of non-revenue metering applications where the current ratio is non-standard, a
composite error test may be performed to prove compliance provided phase error is of no
importance. This is a secondary excitation test performed at a level equivalent to rated current
with rated burden, where the measured exciting current can be considered the error current.
See 9.1.1, 9.1.2, and 9.1.3.
2) For high current ratios that exceed the current rating of one primary loop, multiple primary
loops may be used provided they are equally spaced about the core periphery and the return
path influence is negligible.
77
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
3) For those windings that incorporate an internal shield as an integral part of the secondary
winding, or a shield that is isolated from the secondary winding, the accuracy shall remain
within its prescribed class when the primary loop is severely off center, or when multiple
primary loops are distributed not more than 50% of the core periphery.
Type tests for BCTs can be conducted to verify construction type and design calculations that can
effectively cover a wide range of physical size, ratio and accuracy classes. The following type tests shall be
performed in accordance with 4.8.1:
a) Temperature rise test (per 11.2). This test shall be conducted on the secondary winding only. Some
consideration shall be taken into account regarding the environment, conductor orientation, and
stacking of multiple BCTs.
b) Short-time ratings (per 6.6 and 11.1). Calculations shall be sufficient in lieu of test.
c) Inter-turn overvoltage test (per 6.7.1 and 12.3).
B.10 Installation
It is not the intent of this annex to provide instruction on mounting techniques but to advise of some
cautionary measures in the installation process. When using a method of clamping (plates, rings, brackets,
bars, etc.) caution shall be employed when applying force onto BCTs. The clamping mechanism should not
deform itself or the BCT when tightened. Excessive force may alter the characteristic output of the BCT.
The clamping force should be distributed as evenly as possible along the BCT surface. When possible some
means to cushion the BCT from the force should be employed. For special mounting arrangements and
configurations, consult with the manufacturer.
When the primary conductor through a BCT is a shielded cable, caution shall be used when grounding of
the shield. In some cases it may be necessary to route the shield back through the window of the BCT
before terminating it to ground, thus avoiding the creation of a shorted electrical turn around the BCT core.
This condition will result in the BCT not operating correctly.
Grounding of metallic parts and outer casings should be in accordance with IEEE Std C57.13.3.
In most cases the external slip-over BCT is installed over a bushing terminal outside of the tank or
structure, and suspended about the bushing flange with brackets. Excessive force in this case is not so much
detrimental to the performance as it is to its external insulation system. The BCT should be at or below the
bushings effective ground plane. As a precaution to protect the BCT from a flashover event, it is
recommended that a ground shield be installed. When connecting the ground shield to ground, routing of
the lead shall be in a manner that will not cause an electrical shorted turn around the BCT. If a shorted turn
is created, the BCT will not operate correctly.
In the case whereby the external slip-over BCT is in direct contact with the tank or structure wall, and the
surface temperature of that wall is elevated above the ambient air temperature, consideration shall be taken
in regards to the possible effects on temperature rise, as well as long term effects of the insulation itself. If
at all possible the BCT should be separated from the wall to allow air flow.
BCTs can be mounted and installed in a wide variety of arrangements. For common field tests and
methods, please refer to IEEE Std C57.13.1.
In the case of revenue metering, it is very difficult to verify accuracy once installed. There are some
78
SAUDI STANDADR SASO IEEE C57: 2018
methods used that will provide results that may demonstrate a BCT to meet class, but may not necessarily
match the original factory test results. It shall be the responsibility of the end user to determine the
acceptance and validity of any method or portable device that does not:
This is a special type of BCT that is constructed without an iron core. The secondary is wound on a non-
magnetic former. Beyond this deviation it will have the same appearance as any other BCT.
The mutual inductance of the BLC is set such that a voltage output is induced per ampere of primary
current. The typical value is 0.005 Ω where for every 1000 A of primary current a 5 V output is induced in
the secondary winding; other ratios are possible. This relationship remains linear through the highest fault
level encountered. For maximum power transfer, the BLC may be specified by its R, X, and Z elements.
The voltage output shall be ±1% at rated current with the primary conductor centrally located, and remain
±1% when rotated about the primary conductor. The output shall be ±1% when the primary conductor is
offset up to 25% from center. When performing this test the primary loop shall consist of one turn where
there is no external influence from the return path and adjacent iron-core elements. The secondary leads, if
provided, shall be twisted to minimize induced voltages from external sources. In addition to accuracy
verification, the R, X and Z components shall be measured and reported.
Depending on its finish construction, BLCs can also be hindered by excessive mechanical forces. All of its
parameters are geometrically controlled therefore any changes to its geometry can change its self-
impedances. When making the connection, twisted leads are recommended.
By virtue of its construction, the BLC can be easily influenced by external magnetic forces. When
installing it is best that the BLC be positioned as far away from any iron core and return conductor path as
physically possible. The geometry of the enclosure may affect its output. If the BLC is to be adjacent to, or
sandwiched between conventional iron-core CTs, the effective output of the BLC will be influenced. In
these situations the output can be up to ±10% of rated voltage.
NOTE—This is not to be confused with Rogowski coils as they are not the same. Rogowski coils are addressed under
IEEE Std C37.235 [B34].
………………………..
79