INSE 6210 Total Quality Methodologies For Engineers: Reduction of Unnecessary Calls in A Business Travel Center
INSE 6210 Total Quality Methodologies For Engineers: Reduction of Unnecessary Calls in A Business Travel Center
INSE 6210 Total Quality Methodologies For Engineers: Reduction of Unnecessary Calls in A Business Travel Center
Process Map
FOCUS
AREA
Customer may call for TC handles call and TC makes an After giving
any reason which tries to manage external call if service to
could be: customer requests there is an activity customer, gives
information, by SABRE system in that can’t be regards and
reservation, changes, order to save time accomplished hangs up
cancellation, and efforts immediately by
complaints, etc for system and
Airplane, Hotel or Car requires to place
this kind of call
DEFINE
OUTBOUND CALLS
CONCEPT AMOUNT
Necessary Unnecessary Cost of Calls 16,200
70% 30%
Average Handling Time 87,840
Operational Expenses 48,329
Total $ 152,369
SCOPE Unnecessary Outbound calls made at the Business Travel Center of Corporate Travel,
which represent a 30% of all the calls made total.
GOAL Reduce the volume of Unnecessary Outbound Calls generated at Business Travel
Center by 80% by December 2005.
DEFECT is defined as the unnecessary outbound calls at BTC.
DATA TYPE is both Discrete (necessary/unnecessary)
OPPORTUNITY is defined as all Outbound Calls generated by the call center
DATA SOURCE Lucent Reports, Monthly Call Center Performance Report, Telecommunications Dept.,
Outbound Call Analysis, Data Collection
DEFINE
Methodology
1 Identified through a survey which were the most common outbound calls and types.
2 A brainstorming session was held to group and categorize results in: to be Eliminated or
Left Alone focusing on Value Added, Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Costs in order of
importance.
3 The measurement system was set up using a group of travel consultants working on the
Business Travel Center.
4 Two Lucent reports were created to measure outbound call volume by agent (Consultant)
and by Group (BTC Domestic and International Gate) in order to match all calls accounted
by consultants to their corresponding volumes in ACD System. The unidentified calls are
taken as personal calls. This number has been reduced to minimal through constant
feedback
5 Information was gathered for 10 groups of data in order to calculate an initial COPQ.
6 Daily and Total Outbound Call Volume by Group (Whole BTC), by measuring team (11
FTE) and by person (each of the team)
MEASURE
X1 – Hypothesis Testing Results Ho: There's no difference in unnecessary outbound calls of the
Travel Consultants that inquire for all the required info in the
Root Cause: The Travel Consultant does not make first contact vs. those Travel Consultants that don't make sure
sure he has all the required info to close they have requested all the data needed.
reservations/issue ticket thus avoiding later
unnecessary telephone contact.
Ha: There is difference in unnecessary outbound calls of the
Travel Consultants that inquire for all the required info in the
first contact vs. those Travel Consultants that don't make sure
they have requested all the data needed.
Total 0.44 29
The P value is < 0.05 therefore we conclude that we can reject the Ho.
Data Collection
Conclusion: There is difference in unnecessary outbound calls of the Evaluated calls of 3 Travel Consultants
Travel Consultants that inquire for all the required info in the first contact (100 calls each) as Good (When
vs. those Travel Consultants that don't make sure they have requested all requiring all the needed information)
the data needed. Vs Bad (Missing data request).
ANALYZE
Total 0.327 29
The P value is < 0.05 therefore we conclude that we can reject the Ho.
Data Collection
Conclusion: There is difference in unnecessary outbound calls of those Evaluated calls and follow up actions
Travel Consultants that do follow up on cases/documentation in the Back of 3 Travel Consultants (100 calls
office area Vs. those Travel Consultants that do the follow up on each) as Good (When doing the follow
cases/documentation. up accordingly) Vs Bad (When not
doing the follow up).
ANALYZE
Total 0.483 29
The P value is < 0.05 therefore we conclude that we can reject the Ho. Data Collection
Evaluated calls of 3 Travel Consultants
Conclusion: There is difference in unnecessary outbound calls of the
(100 Calls each). Two of them doing
Travel Consultant that call to any number of suppliers Vs. those calls that business as usual when calling the
are centralized in one Travel Consultant. suppliers and the third one who is fully
dedicated to handle issues with the
suppliers
ANALYZE
Total 0.346667 29
The P value is < 0.05 therefore we conclude that we can reject the Ho.
Data Collection
Conclusion: There is difference between having a correct / complete Evaluated calls of 3 Travel Consultants
communication of the promotion to the TCs vs. not communicating correctly (100 Calls each). Track of the special
agreements / reduced rates, etc.
before performing the call.
ANALYZE
Total 0.3064 24
Data Collection
The P value is > 0.05 therefore we conclude that we can accept the Ho. Evaluated calls of 5 Travel Consultants
(5 groups of 10 calls each). The group
Conclusion: There's no difference in unnecessary outbound calls of those was done of two new hires and one TC
Travel Consultants with a standard knowledge on Sabre formats Vs those with one year of experience and two
calls generated by Travel Consultants that have received a formal training. more with high tenure on the
department.
IMPROVE
SCORECARD
•Currently Corporate Travel manages two reports for performance analysis: Monthly Call Center
Performance Report and a Balanced Scorecard. Both reports review Call Center performance.
•Control Charts will be implemented in both reports to monitor outbound call behavior and to take
specific actions when alarms appear.
•Lucent reports (TC call handling reports) will be designed in order to track Travel Consultant’s
performance on a daily and real-time basis.