Dig Dis Sci (2007) 52:3307–3315

DOI 10.1007/s10620-007-9805-5

R E V I E W PAP E R

An Evidence-Based Manual for Abdominal Paracentesis

Angela McGibbon · Grant I. Chen ·
Kevork M. Peltekian · Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten

Received: 3 August 2006 / Accepted: 1 February 2007 / Published online: 28 March 2007


C Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Abstract The purpose of this study was to provide Introduction

evidence-based approaches to detect ascites, perform para-
centesis, order tests, and interpret the results. A Medline Abdominal paracentesis is the removal of fluid from the
search was performed to identify relevant articles. Of 731 peritoneal cavity. It is an important skill for all internists but
identified articles, 50 articles were used. The most sensi- especially for those physicians caring for patients with liver
tive findings for ascites detection are ankle edema (93%), disease. Abdominal paracentesis is used to help diagnose
increased abdominal girth (87%), flank dullness (84%), and the etiology of ascites (diagnostic paracentesis) or as a ther-
bulging flanks (81%). Paracentesis is safe, with bleeding apeutic measure whereby a large volume of ascitic fluid is
rates and leakage of <1%. An ascitic fluid polymorphonu- removed (therapeutic paracentesis). The investigation and
clear cell count ≥250 cells/mm3 is the most sensitive test management of patients with ascites have been regularly re-
(86%–100%) to diagnose spontaneous bacterial peritoni- viewed in the literature [1–4]. Despite the frequency of its
tis. The serum-ascites albumin gradient is the most useful use, the literature is scarce on the technical aspects of ab-
test in identifying portal hypertension-related ascites. Large- dominal paracentesis.
volume paracentesis is effective in the treatment of refractory This manual focuses on the detection of ascites, the in-
ascites. We conclude that paracentesis is a safe and vital pro- dications and contraindications for abdominal paracentesis,
cedure in patients with new-onset ascites. Once detected, and the risks and complications associated with the proce-
an algorithmic approach to ordering tests and their inter- dure. The technique is described, followed by a discussion
pretation is useful to determine etiology and direct further of appropriate laboratory tests and their interpretation. This
management. manual focuses on important questions regarding diagnostic
paracentesis. Issues regarding therapeutic paracentesis are
Keywords Ascites . Paracentesis . Diagnosis . Review . addressed briefly.
Systematic review The following questions regarding abdominal paracente-
sis are addressed.
A. McGibbon · G. I. Chen · K. M. Peltekian · S. V. van Zanten
Division of Gastroenterology, 1. Does the patient have ascites?
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, 2. Does the patient need paracentesis?
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada 3. What are the risks and complications?
4. How is paracentesis performed?
S. V. van Zanten (
)
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center, 5. What tests should be ordered and what do the results
Victoria General Hospital Site, mean?
Room 928, South Wing, Centennial Building, 6. How and when should a therapeutic paracentesis be per-
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 2Y9, Canada formed?
e-mail: Zanten@dal.ca

Springer
3308 Dig Dis Sci (2007) 52:3307–3315

Methods history of congestive heart failure, renal failure, tuberculosis,

pancreatitis, or cancer who present with increasing abdom-
English-language articles involving humans were identified inal girth, ankle edema, or unexplained weight gain. The
by a Medline search from 1966 to August 2004. The Medi- accuracy of symptoms elicited from the patient history for
cal Subject Headings included ascites, paracentesis, indica- diagnosing ascites has been reviewed using ultrasound as
tions, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, diagnosis, review, the “gold standard.” The most sensitive symptoms for as-
and guideline, study. Bibliographies of retrieved articles and cites are ankle edema (93%) and increased abdominal girth
textbooks were also searched. The inclusion criteria were (87%), with specificities of 66% and 77%, respectively [6].
as follows: main focus of article dealt with detection meth- The standard clinical approach to the detection of ascites
ods for ascites relevant for clinicians, technique of perform- includes testing for flank dullness and, if present, proceeding
ing paracentesis, diagnostic tests on ascitic fluid removed, to testing for shifting dullness and the fluid wave. This is usu-
and indications for those tests. Relevant evidence-based re- ally done in patients in whom ascites is suspected, especially
views (meta-analyses, systematic reviews, topic reviews, those with liver disease. The presence of ascites is an im-
and guidelines) as well as original studies not cited in the portant prognostic indicator in patients with liver cirrhosis,
evidence-based reviews were included, as were relevant case as it is a sign of liver decompensation with an approximate
reports if no original studies or evidence-based reviews were mortality rate of 50% at 2 years [1]. Once suspected from the
found. history and physical examination, ascites may be confirmed
by ultrasonography, which can detect as little as 100 ml of
fluid [6].
Does the patient have ascites? There are several physical examination techniques that
are used to detect the presence of ascites. These include in-
Ascites is a pathological increase in fluid in the peritoneal spection for bulging flanks while supine, percussion dullness
cavity. The normal peritoneal cavity has a small amount of in the flanks, testing for shifting dullness, and the presence of
free fluid (∼50 ml) [5]. Chronic liver disease with associated a fluid wave [6, 7]. Two less common methods are ausculta-
portal hypertension is the most frequent cause of ascites. tory percussion and the puddle sign [6, 7]. These techniques
Other less common etiologies include malignancy, heart fail- are briefly described in Table 1. The most sensitive physical
ure, nephropathy, tuberculosis, and pancreatic disease [6]. examination maneuvers for ascites are flank dullness (84%)
Ascites should be suspected in patients with risk factors and the presence of bulging flanks (81%), both of which have
or symptoms of chronic liver disease, known liver cirrhosis, a specificity of 59%. The most specific test is the presence

Table 1 Physical exam

maneuvers for the detection of Maneuver Description
ascites
Bulging flanks/distended Inspect the abdominal contours for a protuberance of the abdomen
abdomen anteriorly and bulging of the flanks laterally while the patient is supine.
Flank dullness Percuss the abdominal wall starting at the periumbilical region and then
going outward to the dependent areas (flanks). If ascites is present, there
is a change from tympany to dullness.
Shifting dullness Note the level of change from tympany to dullness. Position the patient in
the right lateral decubitus position and percuss the abdomen, starting on
the left side and then going toward the right side. If ascites is present, the
level at which tympany turns to dullness will have shifted.
Fluid wave Assistance is required to perform this test. With the patient in the supine
position, the ulnar side of an assistant’s hand and forearm is placed
firmly in the midline of the anterior abdominal wall, in line with the
patient. The examiner’s two hands are then placed on either side of the
abdomen. While one hand strikes the abdomen, the other hand feels for
an impulse of a fluid wave.
Ausculatory percussion With the patient standing, auscultate just above the symphysis pubis while
percussing (using single finger flicks) from the costal margin down to the
pelvis. In normal individuals, there is a sharp transition from quiet to
loud at the pelvic border. With ascites, the transition occurs higher up.
Puddle sign The patient is put on the hands and knees. After the patient has been in
that position for several minutes, the periumbical region is percussed for
dullness to determine the presence of fluid.

Springer
Dig Dis Sci (2007) 52:3307–3315 3309

of a fluid wave (90%), although its sensitivity is poor (62%) Table 2 Patients who should undergo diagnostic paracentesis
[6]. Patients with new-onset ascites
More recently, Chongtham et al. performed a study of Hospitalized patients with ascites
66 patients comparing the accuracy of physical examination Patients with known ascites and at least one of the following:
compared with ultrasound as a gold standard in the detection Fever
of ascites. Those with a history of ascites or therapeutic para- Leukocytosis
centesis, or in whom ascites was detected by shifting dullness Abdominal pain
Peritoneal findings
or fluid wave, were excluded. They found that ausculatory
Increasing ascites volume
percussion was the most sensitive maneuver (66%), followed Unexplained encephalopathy
by flank dullness (57%). The fluid wave sign was found not Deteriorating liver function
to be sensitive (20%) but to be very specific (100%) [8]. Renal failure

Does the patient need paracentesis? [1]. Table 3 summarizes the features that help differenti-
ate between spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and secondary
Paracentesis aids in determining the etiology of the ascites bacterial peritonitis [1, 10, 13].
(most commonly chronic liver disease or malignancy) and
the presence of infection, and will often give temporary relief
What are the risks and complications?
of dyspnea, chest and abdominal discomfort, and anorexia in
patients with tense ascites when a therapeutic (large-volume)
Earlier literature reported the use of paracentesis with tro-
paracentesis is performed [1].
cars that were associated with a high morbidity and even
As discussed later, ascites due to chronic liver disease
mortality [1]. However, with current techniques, diagnostic
with portal hypertension results in a high serum-to-ascites
paracentesis is considered a safe procedure, with no reported
albumin gradient (formerly referred to as a “transudate”),
deaths or infections [14]. The only absolute contraindica-
in contrast to nonportal hypertensive causes of ascites (i.e.,
tions to paracentesis are clinically evident fibrinolysis or
malignancy), which result in a low serum-to-ascites albumin
disseminated intravascular coagulation. Relative contraindi-
gradient (formerly referred to as an “exudate”) [9].
cations to blind paracentesis (performed without the aid of
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) refers to the in-
ultrasound) include pregnancy, severe bowel distension, and
fection of previously sterile ascitic fluid with no apparent
previous extensive abdominal/pelvic surgery. If a relative
intra-abdominal source, in contrast to secondary bacterial
contraindication is present, an ultrasound-guided paracente-
peritonitis due to a perforated viscus or intra-abdominal ab-
sis should be considered. A study of 27 patients requiring
scess. SBP is thought to result from translocation of bacteria
paracentesis showed that the success of blind paracentesis is
from the intestinal lumen to the systemic circulation in the
directly related to the amount of ascitic fluid present (44%
setting of impaired immunological defences due to liver dis-
with 300 ml and 78% with 500 ml). The site of accumulation
ease. There is subsequent hematologic seeding of the peri-
of ascitic fluid depends on the quantity of ascites, its etiology,
toneal fluid leading to the infection [10, 11]. The incidence
and the presence of peritoneal adhesions [15]. Therefore, ul-
of ascitic fluid infection is 10%–30% in patients admitted to
trasound not only confirms the presence of ascites, but also
hospital with ascites and cirrhosis [10]. SBP may not always
present with signs of peritoneal irritation. In a series of pa-
Table 3 Features of spontaneous and secondary bacterial peritonitis
tients with SBP, the most common presenting features were [1, 10, 13]
fever (67%), abdominal pain (60%), and confusion (57%)
while 74% had an elevated white cell count. Peritoneal irri- Spontaneous Secondary bacterial
Feature bacterial peritonitis peritonitis
tation on physical examination was present in only 42% of
patients [11]. Therefore, a high index of suspicion should be Clinical
maintained in patients with chronic liver disease who present Fever ± +
with clinical deterioration [1]. Table 2 lists the indications Peritoneal findings ± +
for a diagnostic paracentesis. Free intraperitoneal air − +
Distinguishing spontaneous from secondary bacterial Ascitic fluid
LDH >225 U/L − +
peritonitis is critical, as the management is different. SBP
Total protein >1.0 g/dl ± +
is treated with antibiotics, as it is associated with a sig- Glucose <50 mg/dl − +
nificant mortality rate (30% in hospital and 50% at 1 year) Gram’s stain/culture − /monomicrobial + /polymicrobial
[12]. Secondary bacterial peritonitis requires further imaging
and possible surgical intervention in addition to antibiotics Note. LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.

Springer
3310 Dig Dis Sci (2007) 52:3307–3315

is used to locate the best site to perform a successful para- a technique similar to the one described here, did not find
centesis, especially when dealing with smaller volumes of this complication [14].
fluid.
The risks of a diagnostic paracentesis include bleeding, Persistent leak at the site of puncture
visceral perforation, local infection or peritonitis, and a per-
sistent leak. Each of these risks is addressed separately. Less than 1% of patients may develop a persistent small
volume leak at the site of paracentesis. The risk appears to
Bleeding risk be greatest in those with tense ascites. Various techniques
have been used in anecdotal reports to minimize the risk
Bleeding related to paracentesis manifests as either an ab- including the use of small-gauge needles and the “Z-tract”
dominal wall hematoma or a hemoperitoneum. The risk of technique, which consists of misaligning puncture sites of
transfusion-requiring abdominal wall hematoma is less than skin, fascia, and muscle with skin traction [23]. Persistent
1% as shown in two studies, one a retrospective analysis of ascitic fluid leaks despite the use of the Z-tract method can
242 consecutive diagnostic paracenteses and one a prospec- be remedied by using a purse-string stitch and having the
tive study of 229 diagnostic paracenteses [14, 16]. patient lie on the side opposite the puncture site [3]. There
Two larger retrospective studies, of 608 and 4729 para- has been a reported case of using an adhesive glue, 2-octyl
centeses, showed a very low risk of bleeding complications cyanoacrylate [24].
in patients with coagulopathy and/or thrombocytopenia of
varying severities. The results between the studies are con- How is paracentesis performed?
sistent with a significant bleeding rate of about 0.2% [17,
18]. In one of the studies, patients who were prophylactically Once an indication for paracentesis has been identified and
transfused fresh-frozen plasma did not show a decreased rate the presence of any contraindications (absolute or relative)
of bleeding compared with those who were not transfused have been considered and addressed adequately, the proce-
[17]. The amount of blood loss was also similar among those dure needs to be explained to the patient. The discussion
with mild to moderate coagulopathy compared with no co- should include the reasons for doing the procedure and the
agulopathy. In both studies, significant renal impairment was risks discussed above. Once informed consent has been ob-
associated with an increased bleeding rate, likely related to tained, the appropriate equipment should be assembled (see
a qualitative platelet defect from uraemia [17, 18]. How- Table 4). There are no studies examining specific aspects
ever, closer monitoring rather than prophylactic transfusion of technique (i.e., patient positioning, needle puncture site).
of platelets is advocated in these patients [17]. The standard technique is as follows.
There have been case reports of significant bleeding from 1. Position the patient comfortably: in the supine (large vol-
paracentesis performed in the midline related to puncture umes) or lateral decubitus (small volumes) position.
of intra-abdominal varices [19] and a recanalized umbilical
vein [20]. A laparoscopic study found that the peritoneal side Table 4 Equipment used for abdominal paracentesis
of the subumbilical midline is frequently vascular in patients
with portal hypertension [21]. Sterile gloves
Mask (optional)
10% povidine iodine solution or 70% alcohol for skin preparation
Bowel or bladder puncture Sterile gauze and drapes
Local anesthetic (1% xylocaine)
Syringes: 5 and 50 ml
The risk of bowel or bladder puncture is decreased by ensur- Needles
ing that the patient has an empty bladder and avoiding areas 18-gauge needle for drawing up local anesthetic
of scarring where there may be underlying adherent bowel. 25-gauge, 1.5-in. needle for applying anaesthetic
Ultrasound-guided removal of the ascites is recommended 20- or 22-gauge, 2.5-in. needle for diagnostic paracentesis
when there is a concern regarding localization of fluid [15]. 14- or 16-gauge, 2.5-in. angiocatheter or 15-gauge Caldwell
needle/cannulaa
18- or 22-gauge, 3.5-in. spinal needle for obese patients
Local infection or peritonitis Two blood culture bottles (one aerobic, one anaerobic)
Hematology, chemistry, and microbiology sample tubes or bottles
There is a theoretical risk of introducing infection into the 4 × 4-in. gauze and bandage
Noncollapsible intravenous tubinga
ascitic fluid with the paracentesis procedure [22]. This risk is
Drainage system (typically vacuum bottles)a
minimized by the use of sterile technique and the precautions
a
taken, which are described later. A prospective study, using For therapeutic paracentesis.

Springer
Dig Dis Sci (2007) 52:3307–3315 3311

2. Percuss the abdominal wall to determine the level of dull- 10. Ensure that a blood sample for albumin is sent along with
ness. Choose the puncture site: either midline (2 cm be- other tests (i.e., lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], glucose,
low umbilicus) or in the lower quadrant, 2–3 cm lateral etc.) as warranted by clinical suspicion.
to the anterior rectus muscle border. The correct site for
the puncture is not exact, but the far lateral sites, areas of
What tests should be ordered and what
superficial infection or previous scarring, and engorged
do the results mean?
veins need to be avoided. Ultrasound to mark the optimal
site for paracentesis should be used, if necessary.
Tests of the ascitic fluid help to establish the etiology of the
3. Observe universal precautions with regard to handling of
ascites and to rule out infection. The ascitic fluid cell count
needles and body fluids.
and differential should always be ordered, while albumin
4. Prepare skin around and at site selected for puncture with
should also be ordered in every case of newly diagnosed
providine or alcohol solution using sterile gauze. Drape
ascites [1]. Additional tests are ordered depending on the
the puncture site to form a sterile field.
clinical circumstances and are discussed here.
5. Draw up local anesthetic and administer subcutaneously
and into the soft tissue at the puncture site using a 5-ml sy-
Cell count and differential
ringe and 25-G needle. Always aspirate while advancing
the needle deeper into the soft tissue.
The cell count and differential are used to diagnose sponta-
6. With the longer 22-G needle and a 50-ml syringe, enter the
neous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). The utility of ascitic fluid
frozen puncture site at a perpendicular angle. Slowly ad-
cell count in the diagnosis of SBP was initially examined
vance the needle through the soft tissue, aspirating while
in several studies that used a positive bacterial ascitic fluid
advancing. Traction may be applied on the skin with one
culture as the “gold standard.” These studies had varying
hand while the other hand handles the syringe. The trac-
results for sensitivity and specificity and used different cut-
tion causes the puncture holes through the skin, muscle,
off levels for ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear (PMN) count.
and fascia not to overlap (Z-tract), which may lessen the
Overall, an ascitic fluid PMN count ≥500 cells/mm3 has a
risk of a persistent leak. As the needle enters the peritoneal
sensitivity of 70%–100%, with a specificity of 86%–100%.
cavity, a “give” will be felt and fluid should be aspirated
The current diagnostic standard is an ascitic fluid PMN count
into the syringe.
≥250 cells/mm3 which has a sensitivity of 80%–100% and
7. Continue to aspirate 20–50 ml of fluid for evaluation.
a specificity of 86%–100% [10]. Ascitic leukocyte (or neu-
8. When the desired amount of fluid is obtained, remove
trophil) count is not influenced by peripheral leukocytosis
the needle swiftly while aspirating and remove the skin
(or neutrophilia) [25]. Several studies have examined the use
retraction once the needle is completely out. Apply pres-
of urine dipsticks to detect neutrophils in ascitic fluid at the
sure to the puncture site for a short period, if necessary,
bedside [26–30]. In aggregate, they have shown a sensitivity
to ensure no excessive bleeding or fluid leakage. Apply
of 83%–100%, a specificity of 89%–100%, a positive pre-
bandage to puncture site.
dictive value of 91%–100%, and a negative predictive value
9. If diagnostic paracentesis is being performed, the ascitic
of 98%–100% compared with an ascitic fluid PMN count
fluid should be sent for the appropriate tests (see Table 5).
≥250 cells/mm3 as the gold standard for the diagnosis of
SBP. High ascitic fluid lymphocyte counts are seen with tu-
Table 5 Ascitic fluid tests
berculosis, fungal infections, and peritoneal carcinomatosis,
Routine following diuresis, and, rarely, in hematological malignan-
Cell count and differential cies [31].
Albumin, total protein (with new-onset ascites) Hemorrhagic ascites is defined as an ascitic red blood
If infection suspected
cell count >50,000/mm3 . This is most commonly due to a
Gram’s stain
Cultures (inoculate blood culture bottles at the bedside) “traumatic tap,” although it also occurs with cirrhotic ascites,
Lactate dehydrogenase, glucose (if secondary peritonitis malignancy, peritoneal carcinomatosis, or congestive heart
considered) failure. In order to correct the PMN count in bloody ascitic
Miscellaneous tests (depending on pretest probability of suspected fluid, 1 PMN can be subtracted from the total for every 250
condition in italics) red blood cells in the ascitic fluid [32].
Pancreatic disease: amylase
Malignancy: cytology
Tuberculosis: acid-fast bacillus smear and culture Albumin
Lymphatic leak/obstruction: triglyceride
Biliary leak: bilirubin Ascitic fluid albumin determination is crucial in determin-
Other ing the etiology of the ascites. The serum-ascites albumin

Springer
3312 Dig Dis Sci (2007) 52:3307–3315

Fig. 1 Algorithm for

SAAG
determining the etiology of
ascitic fluid. SAAG,
serum-ascites albumin gradient.
∗
Portal hyptensive and
non-portal hypertensive cause ≥ 1.1 g/dL < 1.1 g/dL
for ascites (high serum/ascites
albumin gradient with variable
amounts of total ascitic fluid
protein)

Jugular Venous Pressure Total Ascitic Fluid Protein

Normal or ↓ High < 2.5 g/dL ≥ 2.5 g/dL

Liver Cirrhosis Cardiac Failure Protein-losing Enteropathy Malignancy
Alcoholic hepatitis Constrictive Pericarditis Nephropathy Peritoneal carcinomatosis
Budd-Chiari syndrome Pulmonary Malnutrition TB peritonitis
Portal Vein Thrombosis Hypertension Pancreatic ascites
Veno-occlusive Disease Serositis
Fulminant Hepatic Secondary Peritonitis
Failure
Liver metastases
Myxedema Mixed Ascites*

gradient (SAAG) has been shown to be superior to the ∼80% if the fluid is inoculated directly into blood culture
exudate-transudate concept (using total ascitic fluid protein) bottles at the bedside [1, 34]. Outside the context of clinical
for classifying ascitic fluid [9]. The SAAG is the absolute trials, the real-world yield is closer to 50% [10]. The most
difference between the serum albumin and the ascitic albu- common organisms implicated in SBP are Escherichia coli,
min level. The SAAG has been shown to be directly related Klebsiella pneumoniae, and pneumococci [1].
to an elevation of portal venous pressure [33]. Therefore, it Ascites can be classified based on the culture and cell
is used to distinguish between sinusoidal portal hypertensive count result as follows [10].
and non-portal hypertensive causes of ascites (Fig. 1). A high
1. SBP: Ascitic fluid PMN count ≥250 cell/mm3 and/or pos-
SAAG (≥1.1 g/dl) identifies ascites due to sinusoidal portal
itive culture with a single organism. Treatment with an-
hypertension 97% of the time [9]. Once the cause has been
tibiotics should be initiated.
established, it is not necessary to repeat the test for albumin
2. Culture-negative neutrocytic ascites: Ascitic fluid PMN
in subsequent paracentesis unless clinically warranted.
count ≥250 cells/mm3 with a negative culture. This is
considered a variant of SBP (same natural history as SBP)
Gram’s stain and culture and should be treated as SBP.
3. Monomicrobial nonneutrocytic bacterascites: PMN count
There are typically low numbers of organisms in the ascitic <250 cells/mm3 and culture positive for a single organ-
fluid with SBP, which may explain why Gram’s stain is only ism. Since a significant minority of these patients will
positive in 7%–10% of early SBP [10, 34]. However, Gram’s progress to SBP, it is recommended that a repeat para-
stain is still recommended if infection is a consideration, centesis be performed within 24 hr. Treatment is recom-
as it may identify secondary peritonitis due to a perforated mended for symptomatic patients, those who have per-
viscus in which multiple organisms are seen. In patients with sistent bacterascites, and those who show evidence of an
an ascitic fluid PMN count ≥250 cells/mm3 , ascitic fluid extraperitoneal infection.
cultures are positive in only 50% (by the method of delayed 4. Polymicrobial bacterascites/secondary bacterial peritoni-
inoculation of culture medium in the lab), compared with tis: Multiple organisms are cultured. Treatment with

Springer
Dig Dis Sci (2007) 52:3307–3315 3313

antibiotics with additional investigations (ascitic fluid glu- nancy (i.e., retroperitoneal lymphoma, ovarian carcinoma),
cose, protein, LDH, and imaging) is required. cirrhosis, and infections (i.e., filariasis, tuberculosis). An as-
citic fluid cholesterol level >48 mg/dL has an accuracy of
Total protein 92% for distinguishing malignant from cirrhotic ascites [38].

The ascitic total protein concentration is a reflection of the Bilirubin

serum protein concentration and portal pressure [33]. Tra-
ditionally, an ascitic fluid total protein level ≥2.5 g/dl was In the deeply jaundiced patient, the ascites may be brown,
considered an exudate, while total protein <2.5 g/dl was which is a reflection of the elevated bilirubin concentration.
considered a transudate. This method was only 56% accu- Usually, the ascitic bilirubin concentration is approximately
rate in classifying the cause of ascites [9]. While it is not 40% of the serum level. However, choleperitoneum (bile in
a useful test to distinguish between portal hypertensive and the peritoneal cavity due to a bile leak) is characterized by an
non-portal hypertensive causes of ascites, it is a useful ad- ascitic bilirubin level >6 mg/dl or an ascitic/serum bilirubin
junctive test for elucidating the cause of ascites in the absence ratio >1.0 [39].
of portal hypertension (Fig. 1).
A low ascitic total protein (<1.0 g/dl) has been associated Cytology
with a higher risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis [35].
However, a consensus has not been reached on the routine use Ascitic fluid cytology is ordered when malignancy is sus-
of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent SBP in this setting, as pected. The overall sensitivity of cytology for malignant as-
a main concern has been the selection of antibiotic-resistant cites is 57%–67% [40]. The sensitivity for peritoneal carci-
organisms [1, 10]. High total protein levels (>1.0 g/dl) in nomatosis is 96.7%, while it is much lower (6.7%–13.3%)
ascitic fluid are commonly seen in secondary peritonitis in ascites due to hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastases,
(Table 2). or chylous ascites with lymphoma [41].

Glucose and lactate dehydrogenase Other tests

These tests should not be ordered routinely on ascitic fluid. If there is a high pretest probability of peritoneal tuberculosis
Their value lies in the diagnosis of secondary bacterial (extraperitoneal tuberculosis, immunocompromised patient,
peritonitis [13]. The scitic glucose concentration is low in and/or patient from an endemic area), the ascitic fluid may
secondary peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ascitic be sent for acid-fast bacillus smear and culture, although
LDH is nonspecific, as its level fluctuates with infection and the sensitivity for both of these tests is low (33%–50%) [1,
malignancy. The normal LDH ratio (ascites/serum LDH) is 42]. Measurement of adenosine deaminase activity of ascitic
0.4 and typically approaches 1.0 with SBP and malignancy fluid has been shown not to be useful in a North American
[36]. population [43]. Ascitic fluid tuberculosis PCR has shown
some promise [44]. Ultimately, the most sensitive test is
Amylase direct peritoneal biopsy via laparoscopy [1].
The utility of measuring tumor markers such as carci-
Pancreatic ascites is suspected in patients with new-onset as- noembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 125 (CA-
cites and a history of pancreatic disease or trauma. The ascitic 125) in ascitic fluid has not been established. CA-125 is
amylase levels are often >1000 IU/L, with the ascitic/serum commonly elevated in patients with liver cirrhosis and it is
amylase ratio increasing up to 6.0, indicating leakage of pan- related to the presence of ascites but does not relate to the
creatic enzymes into the peritoneal cavity [37]. etiology of cirrhosis or ascites [45]. Tests that should not be
ordered are pH and lactacte, as they are both insensitive and
Triglycerides nonspecific [1, 10].

The presence of milky-colored ascitic fluid suggests chy-

lous ascites (lymphatic fluid within the peritoneal cavity) How and when should a therapeutic
and should prompt a test for triglyceride levels. This occurs paracentesis be performed?
in 0.5%–1% of cirrhotic patients with ascites and is due to
rupture of lymphatic channels within the peritoneal cavity, The technique of therapeutic or large-volume paracentesis
which are dilated from high lymph flow [38]. Chylous ascites (LVP) is identical to that of the diagnostic paracentesis de-
is defined by an ascitic fluid triglyceride level >200 mg/dl. scribed previously except that a larger-bore needle (angio-
The most common causes in the adult population are malig- cath needle or Caldwell needle/cannula) is used. Once the

Springer
3314 Dig Dis Sci (2007) 52:3307–3315

ascitic fluid flows from the peritoneal cavity into the syringe, on the consensus conference of the International Ascites Club.
the catheter is held in place and the inner needle/cannula is Hepatology 38:258–266
4. Gines P, Cardenas A, Arroyo V, Rodes J (2004) Management of
removed. The catheter is then attached to vacuum bottles via cirrhosis and ascites. N Engl J Med 350:1646–1654
intravenous tubing. The vacuum ensures continuous flow of 5. Boey JH (1994) Peritoneal cavity. In: Way LW (ed). Current surgi-
ascitic fluid. Both the catheter and the patient may need to cal diagnosis and treatment, 10th ed. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk,
be repositioned during the procedure to allow optimal flow CT, p 453
6. Williams JW, Simel DL (1992) Does this patient have ascites? How
of ascitic fluid. The 15-G Caldwell needle/cannula (CNC), a to divine fluid from the abdomen. JAMA 267:2645–2648
multifenestrated metal cannula with a removable inner stylet, 7. Seidel HM, Ball JW, Dains JE, Benedict GW (1999) Mosby’s guide
has been shown to be more successful (faster and requiring to physical examination, 4th ed. Mosby, St. Louis
less punctures) than the 14-G angiocath needle in LVP [46]. 8. Chongtham DS, Singh MM, Kalantri SP, Pathak S, Jain AP (1998)
Accuracy of clinical manoeuvres in detection of minimal ascites.
A detailed discussion of the management of ascites due
Indian J Med Sci 52:514–520
to liver cirrhosis and the role of large-volume paracentesis 9. Runyon BA, Montano AA, Akriviadis EA, Antillon MR, Irving
is beyond the scope of this article. These issues have been MA, McHutchison JG (1992) The serum-ascites albumin gradient
addressed in several recent review articles [1–4, 10, 47]. is superior to the exudate-transudate concept in the differential
diagnosis of ascites. Ann Intern Med 117:215–220
The main safety concern with LVP has been regarding
10. Rimola A, Garcia-Tsao G, Navasa M, Piddock LJ, Planas R,
hemodynamic changes that may occur with removal of a Bernard B, Inadomi JM (2000) Diagnosis, treatment and prophy-
large volume of fluid from the peritoneal cavity. The Amer- laxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: A consensus document.
ican Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) International Ascites Club. J Hepatol 32:142–153
11. Hoefs JC, Runyon BA (1985) Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
practice guideline suggests that serial LVP should only be Dis Mon 31:1–48
used in refractory ascites and that, for a therapeutic paracen- 12. Altman C, Grange JD, Amiot X, Pelletier G, Lacaine F, Bodin F,
tesis of >5 L, albumin infusion of 8–10 g/L fluid removed Etienne JP (1995) Survival after a first episode of spontaneous bac-
should be considered, while this is not recommended for terial peritonitis. Prognosis of potential candidates for orthotopic
liver transplantation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:47–50
volumes of <5 L [1]. 13. Akriviadis EA, Runyon BA (1990) Utility of an algorithm in differ-
Hemorrhagic complications of LVP occur slightly more entiating spontaneous from secondary peritonitis. Gastroenterol-
often than in diagnostic procedures (1%–3%) and may be ogy 98:127–133
seen up to a week after the procedure [48–50]. This compli- 14. Runyon BA (1986) Paracentesis of ascitic fluid: A safe procedure.
Arch Intern Med 146:2259–2261
cation is likely related to pressure changes within the por- 15. Bard C, Lafortune M, Breton G (1986) Ascites: Ultrasound guid-
tal system seen with LVP, which increase the likelihood of ance or blind paracentesis? CMAJ 135:209–210
bleeding from mesenteric collaterals [50]. 16. Mallory A, Schaefer JW (1978) Complications of diagnostic para-
centesis in patients with liver disease. JAMA 239:628–630
17. McVay PA, Toy PT (1991) Lack of increased bleeding after para-
Summary centesis and thoracentesis in patients with mild coagulation abnor-
malities. Transfusion 31:164–171
18. Pache I, Bilodeau M (2005) Severe haemorrhage following abdom-
Abdominal paracentesis is a skill that all physicians car- inal paracentesis for ascites in patients with liver disease. Aliment
ing for patients with ascites should master. Paracentesis has Pharmacol Ther 21:525–529
two critical roles in patient care: the classification of ascites 19. Qureshi WA, Harshfield D, Shah H, Netchvolodoff C, Banerjee B
(which directs further investigation, diagnosis, and manage- (1992) An unusual complication of paracentesis. Am J Gastroen-
terol 87:1209–1211
ment) and the relief of dyspnea, anorexia, and abdominal 20. Aagaard J, Jensen LI, Sorensen TI, Christensen U, Burcharth F
discomfort in patients with tense ascites. Paracentesis is a (1982) Recanalized umbilical vein in portal hypertension. Am J
safe procedure. Using evidence-based approaches to diag- Radiol 139:1107–1110
nosing ascites and abdominal paracentesis should reduce in- 21. Oelsner DH, Caldwell SH, Coles M, Driscoll CJ (1998) Subumbili-
cal midline vascularity of the abdominal wall in portal hypertension
appropriate testing and unnecessary administration of blood observed at laparoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 47:388–390
products. 22. Conn HO (1979) Bacterial peritonitis: Spontaneous or paracen-
tetic? Gastroenterology 77:1145–1146
23. Runyon BA (2002) Ascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
References
In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Sleisenger MH (eds). Sleisenger
& Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease, 7th ed. Saunders,
1. Runyon BA (2004) Management of adult patients with ascites due Philadelphia, pp 1519–1521
to cirrhosis. Hepatology 39:841–856 24. Hale BR Jr, Girzadas DV Jr (2001) Application of 2-octyl-
2. Garcia-Tsao G (2001) Current management of the complications cyanoacrylate controls persistent ascites fluid leak. J Emerg Med
of cirrhosis and portal hypertension: variceal hemorrhage, ascites, 20:85–86
and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterology 120:726– 25. Antillon MR, BA Runyon (1991) Effect of marked peripheral
748 leukocytosis on the leukocyte count in ascites. Arch Intern Med
3. Moore KP, Wong F, Gines P, Bernardi M, Ochs A, Salerno F, Angeli 151:509–510
P, Porayko M, Moreau R, Garcia-Tsao G, Jimenez W, Planas R, 26. Castellote J, Lopez C, Gornals J, Tremosa G, Farina ER, Baliellas
Arroyo V (2003) The management of ascites in cirrhosis: Report C, Domingo A, Xiol X (2003) Rapid diagnosis of spontaneous

Springer
Dig Dis Sci (2007) 52:3307–3315 3315

bacterial peritonitis by use of reagent strips. Hepatology 37:893– 38. Cardenas A, Chopra S (2002) Chylous ascites. Am J Gastroenterol
896 97:1896–1900
27. Thevenot T, Cadranel JF, Nguyen-Khac E, Tilmant L, Tiry C, 39. Runyon BA (1987) Ascitic fluid bilirubin concentration as a key to
Welty S, Merzoug N (2004) Diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial choleperitoneum. J Clin Gastroenterol 9:543–545
peritonitis in cirrhotic patients by use of two reagent strips. Eur J 40. DiBonito L, Falconieri G, Colautti I, Bonifacio D, Dudine S
Gastroenterol Hepatol 16:579–583 (1993) The positive peritoneal effusion. A retrospective study of
28. Vanbiervliet G, Rakotoarisoa C, Filippi J, Guerin O, Calle G, cytopathologic diagnoses with autopsy confirmation. Acta Cytol
Hastier P, Marine-Bajoan E, Schneider S, Piche T, Broussard JF, 37:483–488
Dor JF, Benzaken S, Hebuterne X, Rampal P, Tran A (2002) Di- 41. Runyon BA, Hoefs JC, Morgan TR (1988) Ascitic fluid analysis
agnostic accuracy of a rapid urine-screening test (Multistix8SG) in malignancy-related ascites. Hepatology 8:1104–1109
in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Eur J 42. Muneef MA, Memish Z, Mahmoud SA, Sadoon SA, Bannatyne
Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:1257–1260 R, Khan Y (2001) Tuberculosis in the belly: a review of forty-six
29. Butani RC, Shaffer RT, Szyjkowski RD, Weeks BE, Speights LG, cases involving the gastrointestinal tract and peritoneum. Scand J
Kadakia SC (2004) Rapid diagnosis of infected ascitic fluid using Gastroenterol 36:528–532
leukocyte esterase dipstick testing. Am J Gastroenterol 99:532– 43. Hillebrand DJ, Runyon BA, Yasmineh WG, Rynders GP (1996)
537 Ascitic fluid adenosine deaminase insensitivity in detecting tuber-
30. Sapey T, Mena E, Fort E, Laurin C, Kabissa D, Runyon BA, culous peritonitis in the United States. Hepatology 24:1408–1412
Mendler MH (2005) Rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peri- 44. Uzunkoy A, Harma M, Harma M (2004) Diagnosis of abdominal
tonitis with leukocyte esterase reagent strips in a European and in tuberculosis: Experience from 11 cases and review of the literature.
an American center. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20:187–192 World J Gastroenterol 10:3647–3649
31. Hoefs JC (1981) Increase in ascites white blood cell count and 45. Xiao WB, Liu YL (2003) Elevation of serum and ascites cancer
protein concentrations during diuresis in patients with chronic liver antigen 125 levels in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol
disease. Hepatology 1:249–254 Hepatol 18:1315–1316
32. DeSitter L, Rector WG Jr (1984) The significance of bloody ascites 46. Shaheen NJ, Grimm IS (1996) Comparison of the Caldwell nee-
in patients with cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 79:136–138 dle/cannula with Angiocath needle in large volume paracentesis.
33. Hoefs JC (1983) Serum protein concentration and portal pressure Am J Gastroenterol 91:1731–1733
determine the ascitic fluid protein concentration in patients with 47. Gines P, Guevara M, De Las Heras D, Arroyo V (2002) Review
chronic liver disease. J Lab Clin Med 102:260–273 article: Albumin for circulatory support in patients with cirrhosis.
34. Siersema PD, de Marie S, van Zeijl JH, Bac DJ, Wilson JH (1992) Aliment Pharmacol Ther 16(Suppl 5):24–31
Blood culture bottles are superior to lysis-centrifugation tubes for 48. Webster ST, Brown KL, Lucey MR, Nostrant TT (1996) Hemor-
bacteriological diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. J rhagic complications of large volume abdominal paracentesis. Am
Clin Microbiol 30:667–669 J Gastroenterol 91:366–368
35. Runyon BA (1986) Low-protein-concentration ascitic fluid is pre- 49. Arnold C, Haag K, Blum HE, Rossle M (1997) Acute
disposed to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterology hemoperitoneum after large-volume paracentesis. Gastroenterol-
91:1343–1346 ogy 113:978–982
36. Runyon BA, Hoefs JC (1985) Ascitic fluid chemical analysis be- 50. Martinet O, Reis ED, Mosimann F (2000) Delayed hemoperi-
fore, during and after spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Hepatology toneum following large-volume paracentesis in a patient with cir-
5:257–259 rhosis and ascites. Dig Dis Sci 45:357–358
37. Runyon BA (1987) Amylase levels in ascitic fluid. J Clin Gastroen-
terol 9:172–174

Springer