53 Herrera Vs COMELEC
53 Herrera Vs COMELEC
53 Herrera Vs COMELEC
COMELEC
EN BANC
HERMIE M. HERRERA, DONABELLA T. SORONGON, JULIO T. TAMAYOR,
EDELJULIO R. ROMERO, petitioners, v. THE COMMISSION ON
ELECTIONS, respondent.
G.R. No. 131499 | November 17, 1999
PURISIMA, J.
FACTS:
In its Resolution no. 68, the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of Guimaras requested the
COMELEC to have the province subdivided into two provincial districts. Acting upon
the request, the Provincial Election Supervisor conducted two consultative meetings
with the provincial and municipal officials, barangay captains, barangay kagawads,
representatives of all political parties, and other interested parties. A consensus was
reached in favor of the division as follows:
ISSUE:
RULING:
RATIO:
2. There were two consultative meetings held by the Office of the Provincial
Election Supervisor. As required by COMELEC Resoluiton No. 2313, all
interested parties were duly notified and represented.
3. Under Republic Act 6636, a 4th class province shall have 8 Sangguniang
Panlalawigan members. Also, under Republic Act 7166, provinces with 1
legislative district shall be divided into 2 districts for purposes of electing the
members of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan. The province of Guimaras, being
a 4th class province and having only 1 legislative district, shall have 8
Sangguniang Panlalawigan members and 2 districts.
4. Under Republic Act 7166 and COMELEC Resolution No. 2313, the basis for
division shall be the number of inhabitants of the province concerned not the
number of listed or registered voters. The districting of the Province of
Guimaras was based on the official 1995 Census of Population as certified by
the National Statistics Office.