Myelin Basic Protein-Like Material in The Urine of Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Relationships To Clinical and Neuroimaging Changes
Myelin Basic Protein-Like Material in The Urine of Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Relationships To Clinical and Neuroimaging Changes
Myelin Basic Protein-Like Material in The Urine of Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Relationships To Clinical and Neuroimaging Changes
Urinary myelin basic protein-like material (MBPLM) represents material which is cross-reactive with a cryptic epitope in peptide 84 ± 89 of human
myelin basic protein. While normally present at moderate levels in the adult, these levels rise higher in patients who have secondary progressive
multiple sclerosis (MS). The increase in urine MBPLM correlates with the burden of disease detected by T2-weighted cranial magnetic resonance
imaging. There is no correlation between urinary MBPLM and acute disease activity in relapsing-remitting MS. The ®rst major need for improving
the clinical utility of measurements of MBPLM in urine in MS patients is to delineate its exact chemical features so that assays may be improved
and a potential biological role of the MBPLM better understood. The second major task is to apply the group data accumulated and apply them to
individual patients. This could prove to be means to individually direct treatment and determine its effectiveness.
Keywords: multiple sclerosis; urine; myelin basic protein; magnetic resonance imaging; radioimmunoassay
Introduction
Beginning in 1993, the Food and Drug Administration scored clinical examination which are presently
(FDA) of the United States has approved three reagents recommended as primary end points for phase 2 and
for treatment of relapsing-remitting (RR)1 multiple phase 3 trials, respectively.10
sclerosis (MS). These include interferon beta-1b,2,3 A surrogate marker is a nonclinical assessment
interferon beta-1a4 and glatiramer acetate.5 These drug which may predict an ultimate clinical change. The
approvals represent de®nite advances in the care of clinical events in MS which are of greatest interest to
the RR-MS patient; however, all three drugs are relate to a surrogate marker are those of the changes in
expensive (approximately $11 000 US per year), have disease activity, that is, relapses and remissions, and
only a partial effect on relapse reduction, and have the change in status, that is, the transition from RR to
little, if any, effects on the progression of disease. SP disease.1 Whether SP-MS represents the failure of
Furthermore, recent clinical trial experience, espe- remission or other processes that may transpire in
cially for secondary progressive (SP) MS, has been primary progressive (PP) MS remains to be deter-
marked by drug failure or study termination. Thus, the mined. The surrogate marker most commonly used in
trials of deoxyspergualin, sulfasalazine6 and cladribine MS is that of serial cranial MRI which may be
showed no effect on SP-MS. Oral myelin enriched in performed according to a number of techniques.
myelin basic protein (MBP) showed no effect on RR- Segmentation analysis seems particularly attractive
MS in a phase 27 or phase 3 trial, and the phase 3 trial because of its automated and quantitative features.11
of linomide, which had seemed promising based on Other measures such as improved clinical scales,12
two phase 2 trials,8,9 had to be terminated because of electrodiagnostic methods, primarily evoked poten-
unanticipated myocardial toxicity. tials, and measurement of a variety of constituents in
A number of drugs and reagents are candidates for body ¯uids also represent potential avenues to
clinical trials for MS, but the pace of performing explore. The major substances in body ¯uids for
clinical trials is limited because of the long duration of measurement and analysis include myelin constituents
observation needed for determining clinical effective- and related enzymes, glial proteins, markers of general
ness in a pivotal phase 3 trial of new therapy. The neural tissue damage, elements of the immune system
decision to go forward with the expensive testing of a and a number of miscellaneous materials. The subject
phase 3 trial rests on an accurate phase 2 trial which, of the present chapter is to review the current status of
because of the brevity, must rely on nonclinical studies on myelin basic protein-like material (MBPLM)
methods as their primary end points. Although in the urine. Two references13,14 contain previous
expensive and not always paralleling clinical de®cits, reviews by the author on this and related topics.
cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the usual
method chosen. All of these circumstances place
emphasis in having more reliable markers for deter-
Features of myelin basic protein
mining treatment effectiveness beyond the changes in Central nervous system (CNS) myelin has at least
quantitated tissue signals on serial cranial MRI or in a seven identi®able protein components existing in
myelin and/or the related oligodendrocyte. These
include proteolipid protein, MBP, 2', 3'-cyclic nucleo-
tide 3' phosphodiesterase, myelin associated glycopro-
Correspondence: JN Whitaker tein, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, oligo-