Identification of Risk Management in Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project Peshawar
Identification of Risk Management in Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project Peshawar
Identification of Risk Management in Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project Peshawar
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.04.00007
Abstract:
Around the world, governments at all levels take part very important roles in
organizing the safety and comfort of public transportation systems in the form of
BRTs. Huge Construction projects such as BTR are initiated in intricate and dynamic
conditions bringing about conditions of high vulnerability and risk, which are
compounded by challenging phase restrictions. Constructions of BRT’s have
reformed suggestively from the past numerous years. It is a structure obsessed
primarily by govt. Sponsors. It is exposed against the several specific and trade risks
that habitually speak to more remarkable publicities than those that are conventional.
In this manner risk assessment requires develops. Risk taxation is an apparatus to
classify those hazards in a task and direct it as requirements be with suitable
management. Risk assessment is considered in this research as a strategy that expects
to distinguish and appraise those important risks which are related to design,
financial and management. The common procedure of this research rest on to a great
extent on the review survey which was collected from the client, consultant and
contractors of projects. A careful literature review was directed to distinguish the risk
issues that influence the enactment of BRTs in general. The inspection questionnaire
was designed to investigate the cross sectional behavioral arrangement of
construction risks related to the BRT Peshawar. This research wants to classify and
evaluate the risks and to improve a hazard supervision framework which the clients/
consultants/ contractors can implement when tightening BRT work in Pakistan.
87
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
I. Introduction
Millions of cities currently in the world are facing with serious problem of
overcrowding and contamination; they are continuously searching for cost effective,
efficient and reasonable source for public transports improvements. It is evident that a
well-organized and cost effective/saving public transport system is vital for daily
nonstop journey of peoples within big cities.
Public transport is now dream for the peoples, proper Government transport system is
not available in Pakistan and all the system has gone into the hand of private sector
transportation whose management is flop and not coordinating with public demand.
BRT system is now getting worldwide recognition as a unique system which provide
best and optimal solutions for giving high standard mobility services with reasonable
/affordable prices to the urban peoples in developed and as well as under developed
countries in the world. BRT provides high-quality services with reasonable price
customer care transportation that is responsible for providing standard and unique
services to the urban peoples [III]. The purpose of BRT is to reduce traffic
congestion; it is built on corridors - a separate and safe way. Future planner prefers
those places for BRT where they expect more traffic congestion in future [V].
BRT contains similar features like a light rail or metro system, due to its virtue it is
consider much more consistent, suitable and faster than any customary transport
service. Due to its tremendous features, BRT is capable to control the causes of delay
and other related issues such as being stuck in rush hour gridlock and lining to pay on
board. BRT camber defined as inelastic, rubber tired, rapid transit means that
combines locations, automobiles, facilities and ITS origins into a unified arrangement
with solid progressive identity that summons an extraordinary picture. The concept of
(BRT) is basically based on public transport system within a specific city, planned to
improve mobility/ journey capacity and consistency with the view to improve the
deficiencies of a conventional or traditional transportation system
88
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
After the success of this first project they were further motivated for another project,
the new project in the name of Martin Luther King Jr. East Bus way in 1983, a more
full BRT arrangement of a specifically designed bus way of 14.6 km launched. In
January 2004 the world largest and Asia first BRT (TransJakarta) started in Jakarta,
Indonesia. It is 210 kilometers long. Africa's first BRT framework was released in
Lagos, Nigeria, in March 2008 however is measured as a bright BRT framework
by numerous folks [V].
III. Peshawar BRT
The first BRT (Trans Peshawar) system of KPK- Khyber Pakhtunkhwa which
is right now under building by the supervision of PDA (Peshawar Development
Authority) in the main city of Peshawar, a capital of province KPK - Pakistan.
The project has divided into two distinct phases, in the main phase of the BRT system
east -west corridor will be focused where 31 stations will be constructed with an
initial deployment of 383 buses; Asian Development Bank has initially provided 88%
of funding. It is worth mentioning that the Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in
2013 submitted a request for maintenance from the Cities Development Initiative for
Asia (CDIA) to develop Peshawar’s urban transportation network which is badly
disordered and mismanaged in all the way.
CDIA entertained this request and quickly finished the Town Transport Pre-
Feasibility Study that planned a 20-year city transport strategy, with a 10-year act
plan. The CDIA thoroughly considered the aspect two passageways, a north-south
passageway and an east -west passageway, and finalized has recommendations that
the east-west passageway should be constructed first .Construction started under the
supervision of PDA on 29 October 2017 [XIV].
89
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
IV.a. Route:
The system will have total of Thirty-one stations. The line will contain 3.5 km of
tunnels. The entire bus way will be properly confined in such a way to prevent the
entrance of unauthorized pedestrian and also to prevent the aggregation of vehicles
from traffic.
IV.b. Buses:
The Buses will be comfortable and capacious and will provide easy entry and
easy egress from the doorways. Free Wi-Fi service will be available for all
passengers, while stations will have washroom facilities. During the mobility of
passengers’ peak time, buses schedule will be three minutes, and at the interval of
five minutes in normal situation. In addition, the buses will have hybrids system
Diesel-Electric which will save enough fuel and will emit lower emissions. Accusing
stations will also be set up to allow for refreshing automobile batteries.
6 Safe Well-organized
3 Bus Depots (Should be represented in info graphics at TChamkani, Hayatabad, and Dabgari)
90
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
V. Objectives:
The following objectives have been set for the study of BRT Peshawar.
a. Views of clients/consultants/contractors
b. Barriers to Risk management
c. Risk analysis techniques
91
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
Ve. Qualitative And Quantitative Risk Analysis:
Qualitative includes examination of task risks and chances by using qualitative gages
(ordinal) such as high level risk, standard level risk and low level risk, whereas
quantitative involves analysis of risks and opportunities by using appropriate
mathematical values. Quantitative is usually directed on risks and prospects which
appear as mostly essential from qualitative study and somewhere dependable data for
examination is accessible [VII].
VI. Research Methodology:
A comprehensive questionnaire was developed after studying literature
review for the purpose of survey method. Pilot study was accompanied to form the
reliability and validity of the questionnaire by taking tree respondents from each
group such as client, consultant and contractor. All the Respondents were chosen with
more than 10 years of road/building production allied knowledge. On the basis of
their feedback modified and final questionnaire was developed and distributed to
thirty respondents of each group i.e. client, consultant and contractor.
Furthermore four sections were included in questionnaire such as Section one: Risks
Importance, Section 02: Risk Management techniques applications, Section 03: Risk
Management system status and finally fourth section is the risk management barriers.
Identification of 25 risks major in nature were including section number one. Two
questions were adopted from [XII] related to the risk management status of respective
organization. Risk management barriers were identified, in total of 10 numbers 06
were adopted from [XII], while remaining were adopted from feedback of pilot
survey and from research of [VII]. Three number of groups containing consultants,
contractors and clients were made as a respondents. All of three groups were equally
provided with 30 questioners each (consultants: 30, contractors: 30 and clients: 30)
having total of 90. Telephonically or through email all the respondents were
contacted. To distribute and collecting the questionnaires followed by the interviews
were conducted through filed work approach. In these 90 respondents 30 % having
experience of 3-10 years while remaining 70% having experience of more than 10
Years in their relative fields of construction. To know the response of respondent on
importance of 25 risks, it was scale from 1 to 5 where 1 showed risk of insignificant
nature while 5 showed risk with catastrophic nature. As per the output result of
Shapiro-Wilk & Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, normal distribution was not followed in
obtained data. This denoted one side view either on upper or lower side and found
data was not normal.
92
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
Mean values were taken for ranking the overall risk such Error in design having mean
4.37, design complexity having mean of 4.22, Design Change of work having mean
of 4.23, drawing supply delay having mean of 4.22 and reputation of contractor mean
3.82 etc. out of 25 risks 18 risks having same views provided the contractor,
consultants and clients, while remaining seven results are opposite to Kruskal-Wallis
test result as shown in figure 3. Different perceptions were obtained such as design
error, (p=.000), Design Complexity (p=.003), Design Change (p=0.024), Drawing
supply delay (p=0.004), Prices Fluctuation (p=0.031), tax rate (p = .000),
Coordination, Cooperation and Relationship having poor in nature among Key
Stakeholders (P=0.00). Consultant gave high ranking to design complexity (mean:
4.57) because the provision of proper design of structure was the main responsibility
of Consultants. In addition, cost overturns, alteration, delays in time and any type of
dispute was also associated with it. Consultants also keep safety in high ranking
because of dangerous work and design complexity. Spearman rank correlation results
showed positive correlation between three groups (contractors, consultants and
clients) as shown figure 3.
93
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
94
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
VIII. Ranking of Risks Response Techniques:
Similarly as well as per above techniques in this analysis techniques to
identify the frequency of usage of six risk analysis techniques, respondents were
required to use scale from 1 to 5. Where scale 1 show “never used” and scale 5 show
“always used”. The results of Shapiro-Wilk & Kolmogorov-Smirnov show that
normal distribution was not followed by the data. The risk identification overall
ranking was based on mean responses are risk avoidance, completely transfer the
risk, likelihood occurrence reduction, consequences reduction, sharing the risk and
completely retain risk having means of 4.16, 4.30, 3.83,3.83, 3.61 and 3.64
respectively. The result of Kruskal-Wallis test showed about specific risk analysis
techniques that are identical in case of perception of group. The clients and
consultants were agree on same ranking about risk response as per spearman
correlation while contactor differ the opinion form both contractor and client. The
risks are mostly divided into client and contractors because in most case consultants
represent client.
95
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
observed that there was no idea of risk inspection by respondents even incident
investigation was not from risk management.
96
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
97
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
qualification and reputation of contractor, Key stakeholder relationships, Side
condition unforeseen and finally delay or change in drawings supply.
The paper has also drawn some recommendations for risks related megaprojects like
BRT. Some of them are as under:
a. To reduce/eliminate the barriers against risk management system, formal risk
management system and Parties joint risk management system should be improved
through conduction of study in local environments.
b. For Pakistani industries, international standards should be utilized to develop
the risk management system for Pakistan.
c. Property developers risk management practices and their efficiency to local
environment is to be studied and investigated.
d. According to Risk management level audit tool of Project management
Institute (PMI), most organizations can described their current statues of risk
management system and adequacy level between level 1 and 2 if measured. Local
organization Maturity level should be improved through this study further.
References:
98
Copyright reserved © J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 87-99
VIII. Seung H. Han, James E. Diekmann, Young Lee, and Jong H. Ock (2004)
“Multi criteria Financial Portfolio Risk Management for International
Projects”
IX. Shou Qing Wang, Mohammed Fadhil Dulaimi &Muhammad Yousuf Aguria
2004 “Risk management framework for construction projects in developing
countries”
X. Standards Association of Australia. (1999). “Risk management.” AS/NZS
4360, Australia.
XI. American National Standard. (2004). “Project management body of
knowledge.”ANSI/PMI 99- 001-2004, USA.Terry Lyons and Martin
Skitmorè (2004), “PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE
QUEENSLAND ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: A
SURVEY”
XII. Tang, W., Qiang, M., Duffield, C. F., Young, D. M., and Lu, Y.(2007). “Risk
management in Chinese construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.,
133(12), 944-956.
XIII. http://www.pda.gkp.pk/
99