Scribd
Upload
211 views5 pages

Forensic Engineering Report Writing Method

The document outlines a 17-step methodology for forensic engineers to follow when writing an expert report. The steps include: 1) determining the client's needs, 2) entering report details, 3) providing background, 4) including supporting documents, 5) drafting conclusions, 6) determining cause using a specific method, 7) adding final conclusions stating the cause, 8) describing the investigation work, 9) listing observations, 10) discussing the findings, 11) revising conclusions, 12) including other considerations, 13) adding optional sections, 14) inserting figures, 15) ensuring the report addresses the client's needs, and 16) limiting unnecessary adjectives and words while reviewing internally prior to submission.

Uploaded by

Abit Bronja
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
211 views5 pages

Forensic Engineering Report Writing Method

The document outlines a 17-step methodology for forensic engineers to follow when writing an expert report. The steps include: 1) determining the client's needs, 2) entering report details, 3) providing background, 4) including supporting documents, 5) drafting conclusions, 6) determining cause using a specific method, 7) adding final conclusions stating the cause, 8) describing the investigation work, 9) listing observations, 10) discussing the findings, 11) revising conclusions, 12) including other considerations, 13) adding optional sections, 14) inserting figures, 15) ensuring the report addresses the client's needs, and 16) limiting unnecessary adjectives and words while reviewing internally prior to submission.

Uploaded by

Abit Bronja
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

How to Write a Forensic Engineering Expert Report

Part 1: Causation - What Happened and Why it Happened

prepared by

Mark D. Russell, Ph.D., P.E.


President and Chief Engineer, EDT

When a failure analysis investigation by a forensic engineer has progressed


to the point that a report is needed, the following methodology may be employed to
assist the engineer in the process of documenting the results of the investigation.
Note that this methodology is concerned with the process of documenting an
investigation. Methods for conducting an investigation are outside the scope of
this document and are addressed elsewhere. In addition, should a matter proceed
to litigation, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 26(2)(B)(i) states that
expert witness reports must contain,“A complete statement of all opinions the
witness will express and the basis and reasons for them.” 1

1. Consider what action the client needs to take. Typical goals are to:
a. Determine if peril is covered or determine responsibility/liability.
b. Answer the question, “What information does the client need that will
allow the client to take appropriate action?” If the client needs to
know what happened (the circumstance resulting in loss), or why it
happened (the cause of the loss).

2. Enter client information, reference information, header information, page 1


synopsis, statement of purpose, and outline of report.

1
The reader is referred to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which contains numerous additional
requirements for expert reports and testimony
3. Write the background detail.
a. This will contain the reason that investigation was initiated.
b. May include date forensic engineer was contacted and date forensic
engineer took initial action.
c. May include additional information to improve readability.
d. May include post-failure circumstances from relevant authorities to
establish a timeline of events.

4. Lay out documents that help tell the story. Examples of these include:
a. Photographs
b. Data collected
c. Field notes
d. Standards
e. Calculations
f. Modeling results
g. Laboratory exam results
h. Equipment manuals
i. Reports by others
j. Etc.

5. Write the draft conclusions that address the client’s needs determined in
Step 1.
a. Use the “result, result, result” format of sequential statements.
b. Write single sentences that are declarative.
c. The statements should be understood without the rest of the report.

6. If a cause is needed, utilize the “Determination of Cause Method”2 journal


article and flow chart to write a summary analysis to establish the cause.
This analysis may or may not be included in the final report.

2
M.D. Russell and T.A. Jur, “Engineering Analysis of Failure: A Determination of Cause Method.” Journal of Failure
Analysis and Prevention, DOI 10.1007/s1 1668-016-0224-9, 03 January 2017.
a. Answer each question and provide brief explanation.
b. State the cause:
i. Long-term wear and tear
ii. Person or entity
iii. Act of nature
iv. Unknown

7. Add final draft conclusion stating cause and establishing “Why it


happened?”
a. Use the “result, result, result, cause” format of sequential statements.
b. Write single sentences that are declarative.
c. Cause Stated
i. Long-term wear and tear
ii. Person or entity
iii. Act of nature
iv. Unknown
d. The statements should be understood without the rest of the report.

Consider obtaining an internal peer review prior to further work on report. Revise
as needed.

8. Write “Work of Investigation” section in body of report.


a. Describe what was done (investigative or evaluative activities).
b. Include dates, locations, people contacted, etc.

9. Write “Observations” section in body of report.


a. Facts found, what was seen, heard, measured, etc.
b. Organize in a manner to assist understanding and readability.
c. Observations should be the result of actions documented in the “Work
of Investigation” section of the report.

10. Write “Discussion” section of report.


a. Provide a bridge from the facts to the conclusions.
b. Each conclusion should be found verbatim in the “Discussion” section
of the report (or sometimes elsewhere in the report).

11. Revise the draft conclusions and make consistent with the discussion
section.

12. Write “Other Considerations” (if needed).


a. Use this for information that does not fit elsewhere in report.
b. Theories of others sometimes addressed here.

13. Some reports require additional sections.


a. These to be added at the discretion of the investigating engineer.
b. Examples could include:
i. Chronology (inserted before or after the observations)
ii. Additional background regarding something involved in
analysis - for instance how a piece of equipment is used
(inserted before or after the observations).
iii. Test results.

14. Create figures with captions.

15. Determine whether or not the actionable information detailed in Step 2 has
been provided by the report.
16. Limit the use of adjectives (also known as –ly words which often convey
lack of certainty or equivocation), words that express absolutes (always,
never, must, etc. which often are exaggerations), and undefined jargon.

17. Use acronyms with caution as necessary for readability.

Final internal review prior to submission to client. Revise as needed.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy