Review of Banques Et Banquiers... by Raymond Bogaert

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Reviewed work: Raymond Bogaert. “Banques et banquiers dans les cites grecques”.

Leyden, 1968. Review by: Anthony Macro, The American Journal of Philology¸vol. 91 no. 3
(1970), pp. 349-352
349: “what began as a money-changer's table (τράπεζα) evolved into a fairly complex and
sophisticated agency for deposit and credit”. “the word τραπεζίτης is seen to have ranged in
meaning from straightforward "money-changer" to "private banker," such as the successful
Pasion, the preeminent figure in Athenian banking of the fourth century, and to "public bankers,"
who in certain cities administered civic funds”. “although the Attic Orators provide ample
information on banking practices at Athens and Piraeus, they have little or nothing to say of
banks elsewhere”.
350: “Clearly, therefore, one extrapolates at hazard”. “From early antiquity sanctuaries had
provided facilities for the safe-keeping of precious objects; with the introduction of money they
also accepted deposits of coin. These are what Bogaert calls "temple banks."”.
351: “Bogaert distinguishes two categories of public bank (δημοσία τράπεζα): the one leased by
an individual or a consortium from a public authority and holding a monopoly on the
exchange market in the city; the other set up by a city and directed by one or more elective
magistrates. Such an institution as the latter does not have a monopoly proper, but takes charge
of all banking operations in which the city or one of its organs is interested. This is a most
important differentiation: both types of bank were creatures of their times, though neither
necessarily drove out the private banker who remained ubiquitous-at least until the third century
A. D. As examples of the first type, Bogaert cites the concessionaire at Byzantium (ca. 527 B.
C.-Bogaert agrees with van Groningen in accepting the date implicit in the text of Aristotle,
Oec., II, 1346 b24-6); Diogenes' father's bank at Sinope (IV B. C.); then, after a lapse of four
centuries, the banks at Sparta, Pergamum, and Mylasa under the Roman Empire. He argues that a
monopolistic bank would be customary in oligarchical cities, which is exactly what the vast
majority of the Greek cities under Roman domination were. The purpose of them was to secure a
source of revenue for the city by the sale or lease of the monopoly of change and perhaps a
percentage of the profits therefrom, as at Pergamum. The "State Bank," on the other hand,
was to all intents and purposes a "Department of the Treasury" and worked in the interests
of one
352: client only-the State. Such banks as these belong in the Hellenistic Age; perhaps the earliest
example was at Athens where one was established ca. 328 B. C., probably at Lycurgus' initiative.
The rationale behind their creation was, in Bogaert's estimation, that the depositing of civic funds
in private hands was insecure and unprofitable from the city's point of view”

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy