Simulation Analysis: Did You Meet Your SMART Objective? Why or Why Not?

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Simulation Analysis

Did you meet your SMART objective? Why or why not?


In the competition game, we built backpack for outdoor enthusiastic.
Generally, we meet our SMART objective. In term of specific measurable,
attainable marketing goal, we plan to make the most attractive and high-quality
backpack and get more monthly profit in simulation strategy and we got it as
result. We got many positive feedbacks from customers. We created exactly the
kind of outdoor backpack which has many of the special features customers are
looking for. Our customers also love the color and size of this pack. The reason
why our customers are highly satisfied with our product are the following designs.
We’ve adopted the Large rectangular backpack as it has a quite a large capacity
and helps create enough comfort for the outdoor enthusiast. We’ve chosen the
Wide-padded because it creates enough durability and comfort for the outdoor
enthusiast, and provides a more cost-effective approach than Wide + Chest or the
Advanced support straps. Outdoor enthusiasts are more concerned with the
capacity and water proof of the backpack, rather than comfort and durability.
We’ve added features such as a water bottle holder to allow the travelers to grab
water at their convenience, waterproof material to help protect the backpack
from weather related issues. We avoided a GPS tracker in our backpack because it
is too costly for our price. We chose advanced material as the material for our
backpack which offers excellent durability with its synthetic coating and also
provides enhanced waterproofing. As for color, we chose green to promote and
relate to the outdoor enthusiast. The green color provides camouflage and
symbolizes the outdoors.
However, we cannot meet realistic marketing goal for our product. We aim
to increase sales rather than making more profit, but we did not achieve both
revenue and sales. We need to increase net profit by 10%, but we were able to
increase the net profit by 4%. We only sold 13,580 units compared to total market
size of 37,146. In this turn, the total production cost of backpack is $44. This is
very efficient in comparison with the demands of an outdoor enthusiast.
Everything is provided, and we save production costs by avoiding extra benefits
such as a GPS system and advanced support straps. We have decided to price our
backpack at $105 as the average an outdoor enthusiast spends is $90 on a
backpack. This provides a $61 margin per unit cost, but it still did not bring much
revenue for our business. About distribution strategy, we decided to distribute
our backpacks directly, with a $5 discount due to %0 distributer cut. We also
decided to distribute a High End Outdoor store, similarly giving a $5 discount.
Distributing at High End Outdoor Stores with a $5 discount can be efficient as it
promotes purchases in the most customer reaching area, and only takes a %35
distributor cut. We will also distribute through Department stores and Online
Discount Retailers to spread the likeliness of customers discovering and
purchasing our backpacks. We will not offer a discount in Department stores and
Online Discount Retailers as they take a larger distributer cut. This is an effective
distribution strategy, but it did not bring a large number of customers. It may be
because we advertised ineffectively. We only chose to advertise in TV: Wilderness
Cable Network (twice times in 30 second spots), Print: Outdoor Adventure
Magazine (once time in full page ads) and Internet: Online News (twice times in
Large Banner Ads) with a communicating message of Peak performance, safe and
lightweight. This message just reached about a small number of 672 units of the
total demographic reach (110 of school children, 104 of University students, 153
of urban computers, 190 outdoor enthusiasts and 115 of luxury trend followers).

Did you change your strategy? Why or why not?


In previous simulation strategy plan, we chose school student for our
customer target. However, when we run game, we changed our target customer
to outdoor enthusiasts. That is the reason we had to change almost product
features, pricing strategy, distribution decisions as well as promotions. Because
we cannot achieve net profit, revenue, market share and return on marketing for
school student’s backpack, so we decided to make new strategy for outdoor
enthusiast customers. After that we got more revenue and sales, which helps us
get higher score in total.

What do you think you could have or should have done to


perform better in the simulation?
To get better score in the simulation, we should make more effective
strategy, especially pricing strategy and promotions. We should set higher price,
which helps us get higher revenue but it is still in customer’s budgets. Besides, we
need to make advertising strategy more effectively. We should advertise to many
other channels, which helps us gain more customers and sales. We should
increase advertising on social media, such as Instagram, Facebook, where we can
meet many customers from many different ages. Also, people are updating news
on social networks with a very high frequency. Advertisement on these channels
will increase a large number of customers who know about our products.
Nevertheless, we have to create products with higher quality and more
professional. With these strategies, we believe that we can attract a number of
customers and make more revenue.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy