Sekretariat: Jl. Adam Malik KM. 9 Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38229

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH BENGKULU

FAKULTAS PASCASARJANA PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI


Sekretariat : Jl. Adam Malik KM. 9 Kota Bengkulu, Bengkulu 38229
http// ://www.unmuh-bengkulu.net

UJIAN AKHIR SEMESTER


EVALUASI
2020/2021

Pogram Studi : Pascasarjana Pendidikan Biologi

Dosen Pengampu :1. Dr. Kashardi Absah, M.Pd.


2. Dr. Merri Sri Hartati, M.Pd.

Nama Mahasiswa : ……………………..

Nim/Npm : ………………………

1. Dari hasil Program Praktikum Pengembangan Profesi pada Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi
FKIP UMB, jawablah pertanyaan berikut ini!
a. Model pembelajaran apa yang anda gunakan? Lengkapi dengan sintaksnya!
b. Apa pokok bahasan yang anda berikan pada mahasiswa? Uraikan teorinya!
c. Berapa jumlah mahasiswa anda? Kelompokkan berdasarkan jenis kelaminya!
d. Berapakali anda melakukan pertemuan?
e. Bagaimana anda melakukan evaluasi hasil belajar?
f. Berapa kali anda melakukan evaluasi?
g. Bagaimana anda menguji kavalidan evaluasi hasil belajar tersebut?
h. Bagaimana anda mempresentasikan tingat keberhasilan pengajaran yang telah anda lakukan?
2. Buatlah resume berdasarkan hasil hasil Program Praktikum Pengembangan Profesi pada Program
Studi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UMB dengan menggunakan template berikut!
Put the English or Indonesian Title Here (5-15 point Bold, Centaur, Font Size 14)

Author Name 1*, Author Name 2, Author Name 3 (at least 2 authors; Centaur, Font Size 12)

ABSTRACT

The title must describe the main contents of the text, informative, concise, not wordy (5-15
words), do not contain formulas and symbols, and avoid writing the name of the research place.
The author's name is written in full without a degree. Affiliation includes the name of the
institution and address (including street, city, postcode, country, and email). If in one article there
are several names of authors with the same affiliation, then the affiliation is only written once.
Every author's email must be included in the manuscript and OJS. The abstract contains important
research problems, aims, research methods, results, discussion, and conclusions. The abstract
must be approximately 150-200 words. Abstract written single space using Centaur and font size
12. Below the abstract, 3-5 keywords must be written.

Keywords: Keyword_1, Keyword_2, Keyword_3, Keyword_4, Keyword_5

INTROCTION
The introduction contains the problem (State of the Art), Gap analysis with existing research, and
solutions (Novelty). Every statement written in the introduction must be supported by references
(prioritizing the research results). The introduction must not be wordy and may not exceed two pages.
Avoid writing one paragraph one sentence. The final part of the introduction must include the research
aims.

RESEARCH METHODS
Research Design
The main materials of the research method include (1) research design, (2) population and samples; (3)
instruments; (4) procedures; and (5) data analysis. The research design includes the research methods and
design used. The research design can be presented in a table or figure.

Population and Samples


The population and sample of research include the total population and samples as well as sampling
techniques. Make sure the reason why using the sampling technique.

Instruments
The research instrument includes tools or devices used in research. The instrument used must be clear in
terms of type, number, and indicator measured. It must be ensured that the instrument is suitable for use
in research.

Procedures
The research procedures include all the steps carried out during the research. All research procedures are
written in paragraphs, not in item list/numbering form. If there is a forced list/numbering item, but it is
in paragraph form.

Data Analysis
Data analysis techniques include all the analysis needed to address the problem or research aims.

RESULTS
The research results presented are findings from the research results and not raw data. Research results
can be displayed in tables or figures and given information that is easy to understand. Avoid statements in
sentences that show tables or figures using the word "below or above". Examples of writing Tables and
Figures can be seen in Table 1 and Figure 1.

Table 1. The research results


No Students Score Category
1 Budi 98 Very Good
2 Andi 70 Good
3 Rina 60 Enough

Figure 1. Diagram of students learning outcomes

DISCUSSION
This section discusses all research findings supported by supporting references. References that support
the discussion are suggested from the results of previous studies and should not be more than the last 10
years. The discussion section must contain elements (what else) to compare whether or not the results of
the research are carried out with previous research or others. The discussion also includes an element
(why) which shows the relationship between the results obtained and the basic concepts and or
hypotheses.

CONCLUSION
Conclusions must answer the problem or research objectives, or can also produce a new theory or concept
based on existing facts/analysis. Conclusions emphasize the novelty of the discovery or development
carried out. Conclusions are written in one paragraph in a concise, concise, and clear manner and written
in paragraph form, not in the form of item list/numbering. If you have suggestions from the research you
can state them briefly and clearly.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT (IF ANY)


Acknowledgments contain appreciation given by the authors to all those who have contributed to the
research.

REFERENCES
References come from primary sources (example: Journal, paper, thesis, dissertation) of at least 80% and
secondary sources (example: books) a maximum of 20%. The minimum number of references is 20
references. Reference writing is recommended to use Mendeley, EndNote, Zotero, or other programs.
Reference writing is written using APA Style.

Examples of references writing from books:


Anderson, & Khrathwohl. (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing; a revision of
Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. NY: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.
Darmadi, D. (2011). Membentuk peradaban bangsa melalui pendidikan multietnik. Bandung: Alfabet.

Examples of references writing from paper, thesis, dissertation:


Bustami, Y. (2009). Pendekatan sains teknologi masyarakat (STM) untuk meningkatkan penguasaan
konsep dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada subtopik pencemaran air. Thesis.
Pascasarjana UPI Bandung, Bandung.
Idayanti. (2017). Hubungan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kesadaran metakognitif dengan hasil belajar
biologi siswa kelas xı ıpa sma negeri di kabupaten pinrang. Thesis. Makassar: Universitas Negeri
Makassar.

Examples of reference writing from articles that have DOI:


Antika, L.T., & Haikal, L. (2019). Keterampilan mengajar mahasiswa calon guru biologi: Analisis
berbasis gender. JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 4(2), 101-107. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.31932/jpbio.v4i2.524
Hidayati, N., Irmawati, F., & Prayitno, T.A. (2019). Peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis mahasiswa
biologi melalui multimedia stem education. JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 4(2), 84-92.
Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31932/jpbio.v4i2.536

Examples of reference writing from articles in webs:


Komalasari, K. (2012). The effect of contextual learning in civic education on students’ civic skills.
International Journal for Educational Studies, 4(2), 179-190. Retrieved from
http://journals.mindamas.com/index.php/educare/article/view/255
Whitney, E.M., Aleksejuniene J., & Walton, J.N. (2016). Critical thinking disposition and skills in dental
students: development and relationship to academic outcomes. Journal of Dental Education, 80(8),
948-958. Retrieved from http://www.jdentaled.org/content/80/8/948

Examples of references writing from articles in proceedings:


Prajoko, S., Sudarisman, S., & Sutarno. (2012). Pembelajaran invertebrata model PBM dengan
menggunakan multimedia film dokumenter dan multimedia animasi ditinjau dari gaya belajar dan
kreativitas. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 9(1), 218-226. Retrieved from
https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/7450
Warni, Sunyono, & Rosidin. (2018). Measuring metacognitive ability based on science literacy in
dynamic electricity topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 012041. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012041

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy