Evolution of Mechanical Properties of Gypsum
Evolution of Mechanical Properties of Gypsum
different methods of determining the mechanical properties sulphate dihydrates (naturally gypsum and gypsum from a
(tensile bending strength and compressive strength) on gypsum chemistry industry, ratio is 1:1).
wallboard. Singh and Garg [12] measured compressive Standard ČSN 72 23 01 – Gypsum binders was used for
strength in relation to pH values of gypsum. In the area of classification of grey calcined gypsum. Fig. 1 shows a
gypsum applied by dentists, Li et at. carry on experiments with dependence of a spillage on a water-gypsum ratio. The water-
cold pressing of gypsum (300 MPa for a time of 10 minutes gypsum ratio corresponded with the spillage 140 mm, this
and successive placement of samples in a water environment spillage achieved workability of a gypsum mixture from the
for one hour). The samples treated in this way reached strength point of view of the technological possibilities as e.g. casting.
values three times higher than the reference samples. Water gypsum ratio 0.81 corresponded with standard spillage
From presented results is visible clear that the mechanical 180 mm.
characteristics (above all strength) of gypsum after its Figure 2 shows the results for typical samples from grey
hydration rely on the above-mentioned conditions applied calcined gypsum with water-gypsum ratio 0.71. According to
during the development of its own solid structure, but also on the results of this test, the grey gypsum is normally cured
the successive placement of the unit (for example, the binder in our case, which corresponds to the signed setting
difference between a placement in a water environment and in time, which is denoted as B (beginning of setting 7.0 minutes
the air etc. and end of setting 10.0 minutes.)
The strength values of hardened gypsum significantly
depend on the water-gypsum ratio, which commonly takes the Gypsum paste spillage
value for pouring in the interval of 0.6 to 0.8. 250
Current standards as Czech standard ČSN 72 23 01 Gypsum
binders – Classification, general technical specifications and 200
20
Destructive methods, as their name predicates, are
possible to be applied on tested specimens only once. Main 15
Criterion for tested samples is standard water/gypsum ratio, The tested samples were prepared from a gypsum binder
which corresponds to the gypsum paste with normal with a mass of 1.0 kg and water, where amount of water
consistence with spillage 180 ± 5 mm. This term satisfies the corresponded with the water/gypsum ratio 0.71. Gypsum was
tested gypsum samples water gypsum ratio 0.81 (Fig. 2). The poured inside a beaker with water for 20 seconds. While it was
last criterion is the fineness of grinding, where the tested poured and for 60 seconds after the whole amount of gypsum
gypsum is medium ground and the fineness of grinding is had been poured, the mixture was intensively stirred with a
marked II in our case. Used water-gypsum ratio was 0.71 and manual stirrer until a uniform paste was obtained. Then, the
corresponded with normal consistence of gypsum paste after paste was poured inside the mould so that all three sections
standard ČSN 722301. would be simultaneously filled. To remove air from a gypsum
paste, the mould was shook 5 times after filling using a
TABLE I standard shake (the mould is lifted at its face side to a height of
RESULTS OF CLASIFICATION OF GREY CALCINED GYPSUM
10 mm and dropped).
ACCORDING TO CSN 722301
As soon as the paste started to set, its surface was cut off in
the direction perpendicular to the bar surface. After 15
strength (2 hours)
minutes, i.e. after the finish of setting, the mould was removed
a sieve 0,2 mm
Compressive
and the samples were marked and placed in the test room at an
Residue on
Beginning
[minutes]
of setting
of setting
[MPa]
End
TABLE II
BASIC MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF SPECIMENS OF GREY
CALCINED GYPSUM
Properties Unit Value Variability
Bulk density kg ·m-3 1130 ±8%
Density
kg ·m-3 2090 ±9% Fig. 3: The test arrangement for measuring the fundamental
of matrix
longitudinal resonant frequency of the gypsum specimen
Thermal
conductivity W·m-1·K-1 0.338 ±9%
The specimen was supported in the middle of its span
(25°C, 50 % R.H.)
(Fig. 3), the fundamental longitudinal nodal position. The
Volumetric heat
acceleration transducer Bruel&Kjaer of Type 4519-003 was
capacity 106 J·m-3·K-1 0.149 ± 12 %
placed at the centre of one of the end faces of the specimen
(25°C, 50 % R.H.)
(Fig. 3- the left end face). The end face of the specimen
Water vapor
diffusion resistance opposite to the face, where the transducer was located, was
- 19 ± 15 % struck by the impact hammer Bruel&Kjaer of Type 8206. Both
factor
(5/50 % R.H.) signals, the excitation force and the acceleration, were
Apparent moisture recorded and transformed using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)
10-7 m2·s-1 2.96 ±7% to the frequency domain and the Frequency Response Function
diffusivity of water
for gray gypsum, too. Stationary load was applied to the daily and after five days, they were tested after 7 days and 14
specimen. A size of the applied load depends on the weight of days. At each test time, the same six specimens were tested
a plumb and location of a plumb at the lever. The measuring of using impulse excitation method and time dependent changes
deformation is realized by three optoelectronic probes. The of the Dynamic Young's Modulus were monitored. Three more
length of deformation is whole length of a specimen, which specimens were tested using the same non-destructive method
was placed in the lever mechanism. Axial deformations were at each test time and then these specimens were tested using
measured by the gauges. The average deformation was destructive methods (e.g. bending tests, compression tests).
calculated after termination of measuring. The dimensions and weight of every tested specimen were
Specimens with diameter 10 mm were used in executed measured before starting each testing.
experiments.. The applied loads were approximately 74N for The results of Dynamic Young’s Modulus of chosen six
the first sets of specimens. The second set of specimens was specimens in dependence on weight of the specimens are
loaded by force 116 N. Force 74N corresponds with the weight visible in Fig. 7. Fig. 8 shows the time dependent changes of
of equipment above the specimen. The loading of specimens Dynamic Young's Modulus of chosen six specimens. After the
were constant for whole period of measuring, which was 7th day the value of Dynamic Young's Modulus has not
37 days. changed significantly.
At first, the specimens were placed into the lever
mechanism and then the systems were loaded by plumbs.
Measuring the deformation started after placing the specimens
Dynamic Young´s Modulus
into the lever mechanism. The plumbs were taken off before 6,000
finishing the measurement, as it can be seen in Fig. 10 Specimen 1_10_03
5,500 Specimen 2_10_03
(unloading part of the graph). Then, all specimens were taken
out of lever mechanisms and prepared for compression tests. Specimen 3_10_03
5,000
Specimen 1_12_45
In compression tests were checked the material properties of
4,500 Specimen 2_12_45
hardened gypsum.
Ed [GPa]
Specimen 3_12_45
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
0,250 0,270 0,290 0,310 0,330 0,350 0,370 0,390 0,410
m [kg]
4
Evolution of specimen weight
2
0,45
0
0,4 0,01 0,1 1 10 100 1000
0,35 Time (days)
0,3
Weight (kg)
0,25
Fig.11: Compression strength and its evolution in time.
0,2
0,15 Modulus of Elasticity
0,1
0,05 4
0 3,5
Modulus of Elasticity (GPa)
th th 1,5
Between the 5 and the 14 day specimens quickly dry out.
Tension and compression strength increased (Fig. 11) in the 1
was not realized. Fig.12: Evolution of Young's Modulus of grey calcined gypsum.
Deformation (*0,001)
by plumbs, placed on the lever. All specimens were 14 days 15
20 20
18
Deformation (*0,001)
16 15
Deformation (*0,001mm)
14
12 10
10
5
8
6
0
4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
2 Time (days)
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Grey gypsum, No. 6, creep
Time (days)
16
Grey gypsum, No. 2, shrinkage
14
Deformation (*0,001mm)
25 12
10
20
8
Deformation (*0,001)
6
15
4
10 2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
5
Time (days)
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Fig.13: Creep of gray gypsum specimens.
Time (days)
Evolution of temperature
Grey gypsum, No. 3, shrinkage
22
20
21
18
16 20
Temperature (°C)
Deformation (*0,001mm)
14
19
12
10 18
8 17
6
16
4
2 15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
0 Time (days)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Time (days)
Fig.14: Temperature during the creep test.
The trend of increasing the specimen deformation can be times higher than strength in bending tension. Trend of relation
seen in the graphs. Rate of increased deformation was steady between strengths is visible during the hardening of gypsum.
after the 4th day. The deformation increased faster for more Noted, that the samples were placed freely in a laboratory
loaded specimens (No. 4 – 6) than for specimens loaded only condition with average temperatures 25 °C and relative
by weight of the lever. In case of exclusion of specimen No.6, humidity 50 %.
difference between deformations of the first and the second If we look on evolution of monitored properties of the
sets is only 3 μm (Table IV). investigated gypsum binder in detail, it is evident from the
Temperature in laboratory was between 19 and 20 °C but in Fig. 2 that the gypsum setting starts seven minutes after mixing
Fig. 8 it is possible to see deviations from steady value of water with gypsum and the setting process of the gypsum paste
temperature. Temperature deviation was the influencing factor (in our case with water/gypsum ratio 0.71) is finished after ten
for deviations of deformations (Fig. 14). minutes. The preparation of one set of samples (3 samples with
dimensions 40×40×160 mm) - filling the forms and smoothing
TABLE IV the upper faces of beams – takes approximately 4 minutes.
DEFORMATION OF SPECIMENS AFTER 37 DAYS
Ten minutes after spillage the gypsum to the water, we can
suppose that the solid structure of the material is made –
Specimen Deformation
hardened gypsum, which is able to be minimally loaded.
(μm)
Twenty minutes after mixing the gypsum with water, it is
1 14.7
possible to take out beams from the form and work with them.
2 17.0
In this time, it was also possible to test investigated
3 15.9
mechanical properties using destructive and also non-
4 17,5 destructive methods. For example, from the results of the
5 19,2 strength determined from compression tests (Fig. 11) it is
6 12.4 visible that tested samples after 20 minutes have compressive
strength about 4 MPa. With respect to the obtained results,
then the decrease of the compressive strength occurs. After
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
two hours (time prescribed in standard), the mean value about
The changes of the Dynamic Young's Modulus in 3 MPa was measured for the compressive strength. In
dependence on time were presented in the first part of this comparison with standard two-hours values of samples made
paper. From the time dependence of the changes (Fig. 8), it is with water/gypsum ratio 0.81, for which the compressive
obvious that Dynamic Young's Modulus of gypsum specimens strength was 2.1 MPa, our measured values are higher. With
increases in time, especially during the first week. respect to the lower water/gypsum ratio, it was evident and
Nevertheless, differences between the Dynamic Young's expectable effect. In next time, all values of investigated
Moduli of the two sets of three specimens at the same time mechanical properties decreased. After about two days, all
instant are not negligible (Fig. 8). values of investigated mechanical properties started to
From the weight measurement of the specimens during the increase. The most values of strengths were not changing after
time, it results that specimens dried differently. Therefore the 14 days and were the same as strengths after 28 days.
graphs of the changes of the Dynamic Young's Moduli of the Creep of dry gypsum is measurable and its values are
specimens in dependence on their weight were made (Fig. 7). relatively low. Sensitivity of gypsum on changes of
From these graphs, it results that the Dynamic Young's Moduli temperature is visible from results of creep tests.
of the specimens increases especially at the end of their drying. The fact, that evolution of the mechanical properties of the
From the results of the static tests, it results that values of hardened gypsum is depending on different conditions, was
mechanical properties of the gypsum started to increase proved unambiguously by two independent methods for
especially after four days of hardening and they stabilized after determination of Young's Modulus, static one by destructive
14 days. Important influence to the hardening of gypsum is method and dynamic one by non-destructive method.
included in saturation of mature gypsum. In the comparison of The influence of moisture on mechanical properties of
the dried specimens with the saturated specimens, it is evident structural pores materials is known generally. In our case, it
adverse influence of moisture to the strength (compressive and was unambiguously proved in Fig. 7.
tensile) of gypsum. Paper describes the case when moisture of If we suppose that our samples were put to the place with
specimens was non-regulated. Amount of evaporated water constant temperature and humidity but the samples are placed
was not controlled. Part of water was used to chemical reaction too close, it is still important to answer two questions: How
of the gypsum and the second part was evaporated from the does the time dependence of the mechanical properties look
material. Process of evaporation of water from hardened like? How does moisture influence these parameters?
gypsum is viewable from Figure 9, 10 and 11. Water leaves The decrease of the investigated mechanical properties of
the specimen in time and the strength of the material slowly the samples after the 1st and the 2nd days could be related to the
increases to the expected value of the strength of the material. final creation of the inner structure of the material but
Compression strength of mature gypsum is approximately 2.5
unambiguous confirmation of these conclusions we do not Phosphorgypsum”, Cement and Concrete Research, 12, 2005, pp.
1601-1608.
have at present time. [8] D. Klein, C. von Ruffer, “Grundlagen zur Herstellung von Formengips“,
One way, how to separate influence of time and moisture Keramische Zeitschrift, 49, 1997, pp. 275-281.
during monitoring of evolution of mechanical properties of [9] A. Ghozh, A. Samdi, Moussa et al, “Lightened Plaster – Based
gypsum samples, is transparent definition of conditions of Composite Materials”, Elaboration and Mechanical Propertie, Silicat
Industry, vol.66, 5-6, 2001, pp. 61-66.
sample storage during or immediately after hydratation of the [10] E. Tazawa, “Effect of Self-Stress on Flexural Strength of Gypsum-
gypsum paste to the hardened gypsum. For example, if Polymer Composites”, Advanced Cement Based Materials, 7, 1998, pp.
samples will be put into the water bath immediately after 1-7.
[11] R. F. Acker, “Physical Testing of Gypsum Board per ASTM C 473”,.
taking them out of the form, the influence of the changing The Chemistry and Technology of Gypsum, Philadelphia: American
moisture will be eliminated. Then the changes of mechanical Society for Testing and Materials, 1984, pp. 3-21.
properties will be related only to the processes inside hardened [12] M. Singh, M. Garg, “Retarding Action of Various Chemicals on Setting
and Hardening Characteristics of Gypsum Plaster at Different pH”,
gypsum. In contrary to previous, if samples will be put into the Cement and Concrete Research, 27, 1997, pp. 947-950.
drier with forced airing, where the temperature will be set to [13] P. Padevět, P. Bittnar, “Measurement of Creep of the Cement Paste”
constant value, e.g. 40 °C, the process of evaporation of free Specimen, Acta Mechanica Slovaka 3/99, pp. 133–136.
[14] P. Padevět, “Measuring of Creep of Cement Paste Specimen”,
water from the gypsum samples will be several times
Proceedings of the 2nd WSEAS International Conference on Applied
accelerated and the conditions of storage of the samples will Mathematics, Simulation, Modeling (ASM’09), Athens, Greece, 2009,
be unambiguously defined. pp. 33-39.
The problem of the samples storage in the exactly defined [15] J. Li, I. Alatli-Kut, L. Hermansson, “High-Strength Dental Gypsum
Prepared by Cold Isostatic Pressing.”, Biomaterials, 15, 1993, pp.
conditions is also concerned to concrete samples, which are 1186-1187.
stored in the water bath after their preparation, where the [16] ČSN 72 2301. Gypsum binders – Classification, general technical
conditions of their storage are unambiguously defined. In the specifications and test methods, Czech standard (in Czech), Bureau for
Normalization and Measurement, Prague 1979. 17 p.
standard [16] about gypsum, according which we prepared [17] A. Colak, “Density and Strength Characteristics of Foamed Gypsum.”,
samples, there are not unambiguously defined storage Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 22, 2000, pp. 193-200.
conditions and even though we satisfied all conditions [18] J. C. Rubio-Avalos, A. Manzano-Ramírez, J. G. Luna-Bárcenas,
“Flexural Behavior and Microstructure Analysis of Gypsum-SBR
prescribed in standard, the speed of evaporation was different Composite Material”, Materials Letters, Vol. 59, 2005, pp. 230-233
for different samples. [19] ASTM C215, Standard Test Method for Fundamental Transverse,
The next possibility of verification and approximation of the Longitudinal, and Torsional Resonant Frequencies of Concrete
exact processes inside the structure of the hardened gypsum, Specimens, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for
Testing and Materials, 1991
which have influence on mechanical properties, could be [20] ASTM E1876-01, Standard Test Method for Dynamic Young’s
storage of the samples older than 28 days in the water bath. Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson’s Ratio by Impulse Excitation
Comparison of experimental results obtained by different of Vibration, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for
Testing and Materials, 2006
and independent methods and processes is in any case very [21] G. Pickett, “Equation for Computing Elastic Constants from Flexural
beneficial and in many cases it can find mistakes, which can and Torsional Resonant Frequencies of Vibration of Prisms and
occur during evaluation of material properties, especially if the Cylinders”, Proceedings ASTEA, American Society for Testing and
Materials, Vol. 45 (1945), pp. 846-863
conditions are changing during measurement, e.g. conditions [22] R. Pernicová, M. Pavlíková “Comparison of Mechanical Properties of
of the placement of the samples, which influence the content of Modified Plaster with Different Grained Lime Binder”, Proceedings of
moisture in the samples. Especially, it is important for the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Applied and Theoretical
Mechanics - RECENT ADVANCES IN APPLIED AND
determination of material properties of porous materials.
THEORETICAL MECHNICS. Athens: WSEAS Press, 2009, p. 25-28.
[23] M. Alfono, L. Pagnotta, G. Stigliano, “Measurement of the elastic
modulus of ceria yttria co-stabilized zirconia coatings”, Proceedings of
REFERENCES the 3rd WSEAS International Conference on APPLIED and
THEORETICAL MECHANICS, Athens: WSEAS Press, 2007, p. 222 -
[1] V. Šatava, “Strength and microstructure of cast gypsum”, Ceramics – 227.
Silicates, Vol. 40, No. 2, 1996. pp. 72-76. [24] G. R. Gillich, et all, “Identifying Mechanical Characteristics of
[2] F. Wirsching, “Drying and Agglomeration of Flue Gas Gypsum, (ed. Materials with Non-linear Behavior using Statistical Methods”,
Kuntze, R., A.)”, The Chemistry and Technology of Gypsum Proceedings of the 4th WSEAS International Conference on Computer
Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1984, pp. Engineering and Aplications, WSEAS Press, 2010, p. 96-103.
161-174. [25] T. O. Florin, G. Sunai, “Evaluation of damping in dynamic analysis of
[3] M. Singh, “Role of Phosphorgypsum Impurities on Strength and structures”, 12th International Conference on Mathematical Method,
Microstructure of Selenite Plaster”, Construction and Building Computational Techniques and Intelligent Systems, Tunisia, WSEAS
Materials, Vol. 19, 2005, pp. 480-486. Press, 2010, p. 67 – 70.
[4] C. J. R. Verbeek, B. J. G. W. du Plessis, “Density and Flexural Strength
of Phosphorgypsum-polymer Composites”, Construction and Building
Materials, 19, 2005, pp. 265-274.
[5] M. Singh, M. Garg, “Relationship between Mechanical Properties and
Porosity of Water-resistant Gypsum Binder”, Cement and Concrete
Research, 2, 1996, pp. 449-456.
[6] M. Hurmanic, H. Roggendorf, „Charakterisierung von Rauchgas-und
Natur-Rohgipsen“, Zement-Kalk-Gips, 11, 1990, pp. 550-556.
[7] M. M. Radwan, M. Heikal, “Hydration Characteristics of Trikalcium
Aluminate phase in Mixes Containing β-hemihydrate and