718MW POWER PLANT,

MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH
Rev.: A
DESIGN CALCULATION FOR
GTG BEAM FORMWORK Date : 29-SEP-20

DESIGN CALCULATION FOR GTG BEAM FORMWORK

STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION

INDEX

# Title Page
1 . Input Data 1-1

2 . Reference Drawing 2-2

3 . Preliminary Drawing 3-3

4 . Plyboard Design 4-4

5 . MS Angle Design 5-6

6 . Flat Bar Design 7-8

7 . C-Channel Design 9-10

8 . Diagonal Bracing Design 11-14

9 . Vertical Pipe Design 15-16

10 . Base Plate Design 17-17

11 . Update Drawing 18-18

12 . APPENDIXES

APPENDIX_A 19-19

APPENDIX_B 20-20

APPENDIX_C 21-21

APPENDIX_D 22-26

APPENDIX_1 27-27

APPENDIX_2 28-29
 STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION

1. INPUT DATA

Ref. Drawing no:

1. 19FW-00UMB00-C04-0002-RA_Gas Turbine Generator Foundation Plan

Data :
i. f'c = 30 MPa [REF DWG]
ii. f y =
410 MPa [REF DWG]
iii. W c = 25 kN/m3 [APPENDIX-A : Table 6.2.1: Unit Weight of Basic
Materials, BNBC-20154]

Let, Steel Ratio for 30MPa = 4350 psi = 2.17%; Wc=22.8+(0.63*2.17) = 25 ≈ 25 kN/m3 [APPENXIX-B: Min. & Max Steel Ratio as per ACI Code]

iv. Wst = 77 kN/m3 (APPENDIX-A : Table 6.2.1: Unit Weight of Basic

Materials, BNBC-2015)

v. Fy = 250 Mpa [APPENDIX-C : Steel Material, ASTM A36]

vii. E = 200,000 Mpa

Design Method = ASD

Compact & Non-Compact Check : [APPENDIX-D : Shape Classification as Per AISC]AISC]

1. ANGLE - 50X30X3
λ= b/t = 16.67
λp= 0.54√(E/Fy) = 15.27
λr= 0.91√(E/Fy) = 25.74
So, Flange is Noncmpact with no slenderness effect

2. FLAT BAR - 62X4

λ= h/b = 15.50
λp= 0.07(E/Fy) = 56.00
λr= 0.31(E/Fy) = 248.00
So, Compact & nonslenderness

3. C-CHANNEL - 100X50X5
λ= b/tf = 10.00
λp= 0.38√(E/Fy) = 10.75
λr= 1.0√(E/Fy) = 28.28
So, Flange is Compact

λ= h/tw = 18.00
λp= 3.76√(E/Fy) = 106.35
λr= 5.70√(E/Fy) = 161.22
So, Web is Compact

4. MS PIPE-D38, T=2.3
λ= D/t = 16.52
λp= 0.07(E/Fy) = 56.00
λr= 0.31(E/Fy) = 248.00
So, Compact & nonslenderness
STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION

2. REFERENCE DRAWING
STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION

3. PRELIMINARY DRAWING
 STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION

4. PLYBOARD DESIGN
i. Beam Depth = 2051 mm
Load Calculation :

i. DL
a) RCC Slab wt.= 51.28 kN/m2 (=25*2051/1000)
3*12mm Plyboard
b) Self wt. (12+12+12)mm Plyboard (650 kg/cum)= 0.23 kN/m2 (=36*650*9.81/1000)
Total, WDL= 51.50 kN/m2
Total, WDL= 51.50 kN/m

ii. HL
Horizontal Load is to be considered larger one of the following criteria
a) 2% of W DL = 1.030 kN/m
b) 1.5kN/m of slab edge = 1.50 kN/m (Control)
300 300 <50x50x5
Total, WHL = 1.50 kN/m

iii. LL
a) Live Load = 2.5 kN/m2 [APPENDIX-1, ACI-347 FORMWORK DESIGN GUIDELINE]
Total, WLL = 2.5 kN/m2
Total, WLL = 2.50 kN/m

Total Load :
W'T=WDL+WLL + WHL = 55.50 kN/m

Let, strength reduction for reused material, Top Beam Side Formwork and other non-considered load factor =
125% of WT (as per professional experience)

WT=WDL+WLL + WHL = 69.38 kN/m [= 55.50 *1.25]

Let, Panel Size, b= 1000 mm

L= 300 mm
Panel ratio, α= 1
All edges Condition= Pinned Support
WT= 69.38 kN/m
P= 69.38 kN/m2
t= 36.00 mm (3 nos Plyboard = 12+12+12)
Fy= 42.00 Mpa (Along the Face Grain)
25.00 Mpa (Across the Face Grain)
APPENDIX-3 : IS 710 : 2010
E1= 7,500.00 MPa (Along the Face Grain)
E2= 4,000.00 MPa (Across the Face Grain)
∆(all)= b/180 [APPENDIX-4 : BNBC-2015, Table : 6.1.2 Deflection Limits]

Moment Capacity Check :

M= WTL2/8 [69.38*0.3*0.3/8)
= 0.781 kN-m = 780,532.79 N -mm

Z= bt2 /6 [1000*(12^2+12^2+12^2)/6]
= 72000.00 mm3

M/Z= 10.84 Mpa < 42.00 Mpa

25.00 Mpa
I= 4.32E+05 [=1000*(12^3+12^3+12^3)/12) mm^4 Hence OK
Deflection Check :
4
5PL
∆ 1=
384 E1I
= 2.258 mm [=(5*69.38*300^4)/(384*7500*4.32E+05])]

4
5PL
∆2 =
384 E2I
= 4.235 mm [=(5*69.38*300^4)/(384*4000*4.32E+05)]

∆all = L/180
= 5.6 mm [300/180] Hence OK
 STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION
5. ANGLE DESIGN

Size = < 50X50X3 @ 0.018 kN/m

3X12mm Plyboard
Considering,
Span Length, L = 300 mm
Load Area= 300 X 300 mm
Load Calculation : 300 300 <50x50x3

2
a) Load from Plyboard = 69.38 kN/m = 20.81 kN/m (=69.38*0.30)
b) Self wt. of MS Angle = - - = 0.018 kN/m
Total, WT= = 20.83 kN/m

Section Property Check:

M= WTL²/8 [=20.83*300*300/8]
= 234,359.96 N-mm

Sx/req= M/0.6*Fy [=234359.96/(0.60*250)]

= 1,562.40 mm3 < 1,964.83 mm3
. Hence OK
 STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION
5. ANGLE DESIGN

Ix= 7.15E+04 mm4

Deflection Check :
∆WT= 5WTL4/384EIx [=5*20.83*300^4)/(384*200,000*1.715*E+04)
= 0.15 mm

∆(all)= L/180 [=300/180]

= 1.67 mm Hence OK

Shear Check :

b/t = 16.67 [50/3]

Va= WTL/2 [=20.83*300/2]

= 3,124.80 N

A= bt
= 150.00 mm2

fa = Va / A
= 20.83 MPa

Fa = 0.4 Fy
= 100.00 MPa Hence OK
 STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION
6. FLAT BAR DESIGN
Size = - 62X4 @ 0.014 kN/m

Considering, 3X12mm Plyboard

Span Length, L = 300 mm
Load Area= 300 X 150 mm
-62x4 300 300 <50x50x3
Load Calculation :

2
a) Load from Plyboard = 69.38 kN/m = 10.41 kN/m (=69.38*0.15)
b) Self wt. of Flat Bar = - - = 0.014 kN/m
Total, WT= = 10.42 kN/m

Section Property Check:

M= WTL²/8 [=10.42*300*300/8]
= 117,241.06 N-mm

Sx/req= M/0.6*Fy [=117241.06/(0.60*250)]

3 3
= 781.61 mm < 2,562.70 mm
Hence OK
 STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION
6. FLAT BAR DESIGN
Ix= 7.94E+04 mm4
Deflection Check :
∆WT= 5WTL4/384EIx [=5*10.42*300^4)/(384*200,000*7.94*E+04)
= 0.07 mm

∆(all)= L/180 [=300/180]

= 0.83 mm Hence OK

Shear Check :

h/b = 15.50 [62/4]

Va= WTL/2 [=10.42*300/2]

= 781.61 N

A= bt
= 248.00 mm2

fa = Va / A
= 3.15 MPa

Fa = 0.4 Fy
= 100.00 MPa Hence OK
 STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION
7. C-CHANNEL DESIGN
Size = [ 100x50x5mm @ 0.073 kN/m

1200x600 Form Size

- 62X4 =1.2*2+.6*2 3.6 0.018 kN/m 0.06 kN
<50X50X3 =0.6*4+.3*2 3 0.014 kN/m 0.04 kN
Total wt. 0.11 kN
Load / sqm 0.15 kN/sqm
C-Channel @ 600C/C

Considering,
Span Length, L = 600 mm (MS Pipe C/C Distance)
Load Area= 600 X 600 mm 600 600 MS Pipe
Load Calculation :

a) Load from Plyboard = 69.38 kN/m2 = 41.63 kN/m (=69.38*0.60)

2
b) Self wt. of Euroform Frame = 0.15 kN/m = 0.09 kN/m (=0.15*0.60)
d) Self wt. of C-channel= - - = 0.073 kN/m
Total, WT= = 41.79 kN/m

Section Property Check:

M= WTL²/8 [=41.79*600^2/8]
= 1,880,576.61 kN-m

Sx/req= M/0.6*Fy [= 1880576.61 / 0.60*250]

3 3
= 12,537.18 mm < 28,658.00 mm
Hence OK
 Ix= 1.43E+06 mm4
Deflection Check :
∆WT= 5WTL4/384EIx (=5*41.79*600^4)/(384*200,000*1.43*E+06)
= 0.25 mm

∆(all)= L/180 [=600/180]

= 3.33 mm Hence OK

Shear Check :

h/tw = 18 [=90/5]

Va = WTL/2 [=41.79*600/2]
= 12,537.18 N

Aw= htw Web Thickness ,tw 5 mm

= 450.00 mm2 Web Height, h 90 mm

fa = Va / Aw
= 27.86 MPa

Fa = 0.4 Fy
= 100.00 MPa Hence OK
 STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION

8. DIAGONAL BRACING
Size =
D= 38 mm O/O
t= 2.3 mm
4
I= 41,265.90 mm
Self wt. of Pipe= 2.030 kg/m = 0.02 kN/m

Load Calculation :
Vertical Load for a single Pipe = 25.12 kN (Load from MS Pipes)
Vertical Load for 3 Pipes Togather, Pr = 75.36 kN [Let 3 Pipes will be Braced Togather]
Lateral Load for Vertical Load, Prb = 0.4% Pr [APPENDIX-4 : AISC A-6 for Relative Bracing]
= 0.30 kN …....................... (i)

Lateral Load due to Concrete Dumping, Wind and others Factor wil be greater of the following two criteria
a) 2% of Toal Dead Load on Slab Form 3 Pipes with x-bracing
b) 1.5kN/m at edge of Slab Form

Now Calculate Total Dead Load of TB = Toal wt. of Concrete of GTG Beam x 125%
= 423.56 kN [=3*1.8*2.51*25*125%]
2% of Toal Deal Load= 0.88 kN/m [=423.56/(3*2+1.8*2)*2%] [Beam Perimeter inside + outside = 164.698rm]
So Take = 1.50 kN/m

Pipes to Pipes Distance = 600 mm C/C (max)

Load on a Single Pipes = 0.90 kN …......................(ii)

Total Lateral Laod :

Horizontal Bracing
(i) + (ii) = P1 = 1.20 kN

Input Data
MS Pipe
Vertical Pipe Height, h1 = 2000.00 mm = 6.56 ft
Bent Width, L= 1200.00 mm = 3.94 ft [=600x2=1200mm]
Lateral Story Load, P1 = 1.20 kN = 0.27 Kip
Left & Right Column, LC1=LR1 = 2000.00 mm = 6.56 ft [=D=38, t=1.2, A=0.22]
Beam, HB1 = 1200.00 mm = 3.94 ft
[=D=38, t=1.2, A=0.22]
Bracing Beam, DB1 = 2332.38 mm = 7.65 ft
Mod. Of Elasticity, E= 200.00 Gpa = 29000.00 ksi

[Design refers to Next Page]

 "XBRACING.xls" Program
Version 1.2

X-Braced Bent Analysis for Lateral Loads

For 1-Story Bent
Assuming Fully Braced, Tension-Only System
Job Name: MEG 718MW CCPP Subject: Z3-TB BRACING
Job Number: STG/MB&TB/FORM-01 Originator: SINAMM Checker: SCT

Forces and Reactions: L= 3.94 ft.

Lateral Story Loads (Bent Width)
P1 = 0.27 k 0.27 k

Story Height -0.52 k

0.00 k

0.45 k
h1 = 6.56 ft. Brace Angle1=59.04 L1=7.65 ft. Ht = 6.56 ft.
(Total Bent Height)
P(bot) = 0.00 k 0.27 k = VL

Member Force Sign Convention:

+ = Compression 3.94 ft.
- = Tension
Vertical Reaction Sign Convention:
Upward = Compression RL = 0.45 k RR = 0.45 k
Downward = Tension (Uplift) Bent Elevation

Input Data for Drift Analysis:

Member Data Nomenclature:

Designation Length Area LC = Left Column Segment
(ft.) (in.^2) RC = Right Column Segment
Left Col. LC1 6.56 0.22 HB = Horizontal Beam
Right Col. RC1 6.56 0.22 DB = Diagonal Brace
Beam HB1 3.94 0.22
Brace DB1 7.65 0.22 Note: Column segments, beams,
and braces are numbered from
Mod. of Elasticity, E = 29000 ksi bottom to top, same as stories.

Results: Note: Results are for joints at left side of bent, with all members (segments) assumed pinned at both ends.

Drift Analysis
Story Total Drift Drift Ratio
Number Dt (in.) (Total)
Story 1 0.0259 Ht / 3039

13 of 19 29-09-20 9:14 PM
 Bracing Pipe Capacity Check :
Size =
D= 38 mm O/O
t= 2.3 mm
4
I= 41,265.90 mm
Rgx = 12.65 mm
Self wt. of Pipe= 2.030 kg/m = 0.02 kN/m

Load Calculation :

Load on Horizontal Pipe = 0.27 k = 1.20 kN Unbraced Length = = 5.25 ft = 1600.41 mm

Tension/Compression, Load on Diagonal Bracing Pipe = 0.52 k = 2.33 kN Unbraced Length = = 15.04 ft = 4585.37 mm

Let Diagonal Pipe is in Critical Condition

Pu = 2.33 kN

Load Capacity Check :

Unbraced Condition :
k= 1
Leff = 2332.38 mm
kLeff/Rgx = 184.38 < 200 Hence OK

2
π EI
Critical Load on Props, P cr = 2
(kLeff)
= 14.97 kN = 1,526.84 kg

F.S.= 6.42 >2.0 Hence OK

Pu
Pn =
Bulking Displacement Check : Ωc =1.6 (AISC Specficiation)
Buckling Displacement, ∂s= 1/1-((Pu/(1.67xPcr)))< 1.5
= 1.11 < 1.5 Hence OK
 STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION

9. VERTICAL PIPE DESIGN

Size =
D= 38 mm O/O
t= 2.3 mm
4
I= 41,265.90 mm [APPENDIX-6 : online sectional property calculator)
Rgx = 12.65 mm
Self wt. of Pipe= 2.03 kg/m = 0.02 kN/m

Span Length = 600 mm

Load Area= 600x600mm

i. Load Calculation :
a) Load from C-Channel = 41.79 kN/m = 25.07 kN/m [41.81*0.60]
b) Self wt. of each Props = 0.02 KN/m = 0.044 kN
Total, Pu= = 25.12 kN

Unbraced Condition :

Leff = 2000 mm
k= 1
kLeff /Rgx = 158.10 <200 Hence OK

2
π EI
Critical Load on Props, P cr = 2
(kLeff)
= 20.36 kN Pu
Pn =
Ωc =1.6 (AISC Specficiation)
 F.S.= 0.81 < 2.50 NG

Braced Condition :
Leff = 1000 mm (Considering one Horizontal Bracing at Middle =2200/2)
k= 1
2
π EI
Critical Load on Props, P cr = 2
(kLeff)

= 81.46 kN

F.S.= 3.24 >2.5 Hence OK

Buckling Displacement, ∂s= 1/1-((Pu/(1.67xPcr)))< 1.5

= 1.24 < 1.5 Hence OK

Note: As per design, one horizontal bracing is enough but recommended to provide additional two (02) horizontal bracing
at top and bottom for more safety.

Combined Bending & Axial Compression Check :

Input :

Column Length = 3.28 ft [2000/2mm]

Column Section = HSS4.0x0.188 [D=100mm=4", t= 4.5mm=0.188"]

Column Yield Stress = 36 ksi [250 Mpa]

Axial Load = 5.53 Kip 25.31 kN]

Lateral Load = 0.26 Kip [1.20kN]

M= 0.43 Kip-ft [0.26*6.56/2]

[Design refers to Next Page]

Tube / Pipe Column Design Based on AISC-ASD 9th

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY

COLUMN SECTION (Tube or Pipe) HSS4.000X0.188
Pipe A rx ry Sx Sy x y
2.09 1.35 1.35 1.92 1.92 3.83 3.83

COLUMN YIELD STRESS Fy = 36 ksi

DIMENSIONS H = 3.28 ft

AXIAL LOAD P = 5.53 kips

STRONG AXIS BENDING ? (1=Yes, 0=No) => 1 yes, strong axis, x-x, bending.
BENDING Moment M = 0.434 k-ft

THE DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
CHECK COMBINED COMPRESSION AND BENDING CAPACITY

ìfa fb fa
ï + , for £ 0.15
ïFa Fb Fa
ï æ fa Cm f b ö
ï ç + ÷
í ç F a ç1 - f a ö÷ F b ÷
æ
fa
= 0.26 < 4/3 [Satisfactory]
ï L arg er of ç è F 'e ø ÷ , for > 0.15 (AISC-ASD, H1, page 5-54)
ï ç ÷ Fa
ï ç fa + fb ÷
ï ç 0.6 F y F b ÷
ï
î è ø
Where fa = P / A = 2.6 ksi
Es = 29000 ksi
KL x = 3.2808399 ft, for x-x axial load. KL y = 3.2808 ft, for y-y axial load.
(KL / r)max = 29 < 200 [Satisfactory]
C c = (2 p 2 E s / F y ) 0.5 = 126

ì é ( kl / r ) ú 2ù
ï ê1 - Fy
ï ê 2C c2 ú kl
ï ë û , for £ Cc
ï 5 3 ( kl / r ) ( kl / r ) 3 r 20.0 ksi, (AISC-ASD, E2, page 5-42)
Fa =í + - =
ï3 8C c 8C 3c
ï 2 > fa [Satisfactory]
ï 12p E kl
2
, for > Cc
ï 23( kl / r ) r
î
Cm = 1.0
M max = 0.43 ft-kips, at middle of column
f b = M max / S = 2.7099 ksi
F b = 0.6 F y = 21.6 ksi, (AISC-ASD, F3, page 5-48) > 3/4 f b [Satisfactory]
12p 2E
F 'e = 2
= 176.55 ksi
23( kl / r )

CHECK LATERAL DEFLECTION

5w H 4
D Mid = = 0.01 in
384 EI
< L / 180 = 0.22 in [Satisfactory]
 STRUCTURE : GTG BEAM FORMWORK DESIGN CALCULATION
10. BASE PLATE DESIGN

(For Axial Load Only)

INPUT DATA:
Total axial load of column, P = 5.53 kip
Specified concrete strength, fc' = 5 ksi [30MPa = 5 ksi]
Yield stress of steel, Fy = 60 ksi [410MPa = 60ksi]
Dia of MS Pipe, d = 38 mm 1.5 in
Wall Thickness, t = 2.3 mm 0.09 in
Efective Area of Base Plate, Aeff = 9230.345 mm2 [pi()(D-t)(t+2c); c=40mm]

Take Width of base plate, W b = 97 mm 3.82 in

and Length of base plate, Lb= 97 mm 3.82 in

Thickness of Foundation, = 2000 mm 80 in

SOLUTION:
According to column size:
Required width of the footing, Wf = 147 mm 5.79 in [160+35*2]
Required length of the footing, Lf = 167 mm 6.57 in [16035*2]
Area of concrete footing, A f = Wf x Lf = 24549 mm2 38.1 sq. in

Area of chosen base plate, A b = Wb x L b = 9409 mm2 14.6 sq. in

Required area of base plate, A1 = (P/0.35fc')2/Af = 0.26 sq. in
'
Required area of base plate, A2 = P/0.7fc = 1.58 sq. in

Required minimum area of base plate, Ar = 1.58 sq. in < 14.58 sq. in

Hence, Designed area of base plate, A = 14.58 sq. in Chosen base plate size OK

Size of Bse Plate, Lb x W b = SQ 4" X 4" = SQ 100 X 100

Actual bearing stress, f p = P/A = 0.38 ksi

m = (Lb-0.95d)/2 = 1.2 in
n = (Wb-0.8d)/2 = 1.31 in

Thickness, t1 = 2m f p/Fy = 0.19 in

Thickness, t2 = 2n f p/Fy = 0.21 in

Require thickness of base plate, t = 0.21 in 5 mm

Hence, Designed base plate thickness, t b = 0.29 in 6 mm (1 mm added for Surface Protection)
O.K.

Required Welding Size

D=38, t=2.3mm MS Pipe
Accodring to AISC Table J2.4 : Minimum Size of Fillet Welds

For 8mm thick plate, it is recommendaded 5mm welding all around the pipe.

t=8mm MS Base Plate

5mm Fillet Weld all around of

MS Pipe
 3xT12
Marine Plyboard 3.000
0.600
[- 50x50x5
0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
C-Channel
0.600

U-head
1.200

X X
0.600

C - Channel
Ø 38,t=2.3 [-100x50x5
MS Pipe
Ø 38,t=2.3
MS Pipe
Detail-1 3XT12 Ply board
GTG BEAM SHUTTER LAYOUT
3.00
3xT12 Marine Plyboard
2.051

600x1200 Euroform
BEAM
C - Channel
[-100x50x5
U-head
Detail-1
1.200

0.600
2.665

3XT12 Ply board

Ø 38,t=2.3
MS Pipe
<50x50x3
MS Angle
Euroform Model
- 62x4 Flat bar
NOTE : ALL DIMENSION ARE IN METER UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
Sq 100x100, t=6
REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION
SECTION X-X No:
Ø38, t=2.3 MS Pipe
Diagonal Bracing
(Both Direction) RA 29-09-20 APPROVAL
PROJECT : LOCATION : PROJECT MANAGEMENT BY : DRAWING TITLE: DESIGNED BY: SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED. APPROVED BY:
718 MW COMBINED CYCLE POWER PROJECT, MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH
GTG BEAM SHUTTER DETAILS CHECKED BY:
MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH
SHEET NO:- SCALE DRAWN BY:
SINAMM/ GTG/BEAM/SHUTTER/01 AS SHOWN SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED
Loads on Buildings and Structures Chapter 2

2.2 DEAD LOADS

2.2.1 General
The minimum design dead load for buildings and portions thereof shall be determined in accordance with the
provisions of this Section. In addition, design of the overall structure and its primary load-resisting systems shall
conform to the general design provisions given in Chapter 1.
2.2.2 Definition
Dead Load is the vertical load due to the weight of permanent structural and non-structural components and
attachments of a building such as walls, floors, ceilings, permanent partitions and fixed service equipment etc.
2.2.3 Assessment of Dead Load
Dead load for a structural member shall be assessed based on the forces due to:
·� weight of the member itself,
·� weight of all materials of construction incorporated into the building to be supported permanently by the
member,
·� weight of permanent partitions,
·� weight of fixed service equipment, and
·� net effect of prestressing.
2.2.4 Weight of Materials and Constructions
In estimating dead loads, the actual weights of materials and constructions shall be used, provided that in the
absence of definite information, the weights given in Tables 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 shall be assumed for the purposes of
design.
Table 6.2.1: Unit Weight of Basic Materials
Material Unit Weight Material Unit Weight
(kN/m3) (kN/m3)
Aluminium 27.0 Granite, Basalt 26.4

Asphalt 21.2 Iron - cast 70.7

Brass 83.6 - wrought 75.4

Bronze 87.7 Lead 111.0

Brick 18.9 Limestone 24.5

Cement 14.7 Marble 26.4

Coal, loose 8.8 Sand, dry 15.7

Concrete - stone aggregate (unreinforced) 22.8* Sandstone 22.6

- brick aggregate (unreinforced) 20.4* Slate 28.3

Copper 86.4 Steel 77.0

Cork, normal 1.7 Stainless Steel 78.75

Cork, compressed 3.7 Timber 5.9-11.0

Glass, window (soda-lime) 25.5 Zinc 70.0

* for reinforced concrete, add 0.63 kN/m3 for each 1% by volume of main reinforcement

Bangladesh National Building Code 2015 6-35

 1
APPENDIX-C
347-6 ACI STANDARD

• Insufficient allowance for eccentric loading due to • Location of external vibrator mountings;
placement sequences; • Crush plates or wrecking plates where stripping can
• Failure to investigate bearing stresses in members in damage concrete;
contact with shores or struts; • Removal of spreaders or temporary blocking;
• Failure to provide proper lateral bracing or lacing of • Cleanout holes and inspection openings;
shoring; • Construction joints, contraction joints, and expansion
• Failure to investigate the slenderness ratio of compres- joints in accordance with contract documents (also
sion members; refer to ACI 301);
• Inadequate provisions to tie corners of intersecting • Sequence of concrete placement and minimum elapsed
cantilevered forms together; time between adjacent placements;
• Failure to account for loads imposed on form hardware • Chamfer strips or grade strips for exposed corners and
anchorages during closure of form panel gaps when construction joints;
aligning formwork; and • Camber;
• Failure to account for elastic shortening during post- • Mudsills or other foundation provisions for formwork;
tensioning. • Special provisions, such as safety, fire, drainage, and
2.1.5 Formwork drawings and calculations—Before protection from ice and debris at water crossings;
constructing forms, the formwork engineer/contractor may • Formwork coatings;
be required to submit detailed drawings, design calculations, • Notes to formwork erector showing size and location of
or both of proposed formwork for review and approval by conduits and pipes projecting through formwork; and
the engineer/architect or approving agency. If such drawings • Temporary openings or attachments for climbing crane
are not approved by the engineer/architect or approving or other material handling equipment.
agency, the formwork engineer/contractor should make such
changes as may be required before the start of construction 2.2—Loads
of the formwork. 2.2.1 Vertical loads—Vertical loads consist of dead and
The review, approval, or both of the formwork drawings live loads. The weight of formwork plus the weight of the
does not relieve the contractor of the responsibility for reinforcement and freshly placed concrete is dead load. The
adequately constructing and maintaining the forms so that live load includes the weight of the workers, equipment,
they will function properly. If reviewed by persons other material storage, runways, and impact.
than those employed by the contractor, the review or Vertical loads assumed for shoring and reshoring design
approval indicates that no exception is taken by the reviewer for multistory construction should include all loads trans-
to the assumed design loadings in combination with design mitted from the floors above as dictated by the proposed
stresses shown; the proposed construction methods; the construction schedule. Refer to Section 2.5.
placement rates, equipment, and sequences; the proposed The formwork should be designed for a live load of not
form materials; and the overall scheme of formwork. All less than 50 lb/ft2 (2.4 kPa) of horizontal projection. When
major design values and loading conditions should be shown motorized carts are used, the live load should not be less than
on formwork drawings. These include assumed values of 75 lb/ft2 (3.6 kPa).
live load; the compressive strength of concrete for formwork The design load for combined dead and live loads should
removal and for application of construction loads; rate of not be less than 100 lb/ft2 (4.8 kPa) or 125 lb/ft2 (6.0 kPa) if
placement, minimum temperature, height, and drop of motorized carts are used.
concrete; weight of moving equipment that can be operated 2.2.2 Lateral pressure of concrete—Unless the conditions
on formwork; foundation pressure; design stresses; camber of Section 2.2.2.1 or 2.2.2.2 are met, formwork should be
diagrams; and other pertinent information, if applicable. designed for the lateral pressure of the newly placed concrete
In addition to specifying types of materials, sizes, lengths, given in Eq. (2.1a) or (2.1b). Minimum values given for
and connection details, formwork drawings should provide other pressure formulas do not apply to Eq. (2.1a) and (2.1b).
for applicable details, such as:
• Procedures, sequence, and criteria for removal of p = wh (lb/ft2) (2.1a)
forms, shores, and reshores;
• Design allowance for construction loads on new slabs p = ρgh (kPa) (2.1b)
when such allowance will affect the development of shor-
ing, reshoring schemes, or both (refer to Sections 2.5 and where
3.8 for shoring and reshoring of multistory structures); p = lateral pressure, lb/ft2 (kPa);
• Anchors, form ties, shores, lateral bracing, and horizontal w = unit weight of concrete, lb/ft3;
lacing; ρ = density of concrete, kg/m3;
• Field adjustment of forms; g = gravitational constant, 9.81 N/kg; and
• Waterstops, keyways, and inserts; h = depth of fluid or plastic concrete from top of place-
• Working scaffolds and runways; ment to point of consideration in form, ft (m).
• Weepholes or vibrator holes, where required; The set characteristics of a mixture should be understood,
• Screeds and grade strips; and using the rate of placement, the level of fluid concrete
 APPENDIX-2

IS 710 : 2010

into shorter intervals by keeping the samples in room and Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
temperature at 27 ± 2°C in water (in case of boiling) and Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act,
or in air (in case of drying). The sample shall have an 1977 along with the authorization, if required under
average and minimum individual modulus of elasticity the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 while applying
and modulus of rupture not less than the values for ECO-Mark appropriate with enforced Rules and
specified in Table 4. Regulations of forest department.
Table 3 Minimum Values for MOE and MOR 10.2 Specific Requirements
(Clause 9.1.6)
The plywood shall conform to the specific requirements
Sl Requirement Along the Across the given for ECO-Mark under relevant clauses of the
No. Face Grain Face Grain
(1) (2) (3) (4) standard.

i) MOE, N/mm 2: NOTE — The manufacturer shall provide documentary

a) Average 70500 40000 evidence by way of certificate or declaration to Bureau of Indian
b) Minimum 60700 30600 Standards, while applying for ECO-Mark.
individual
ii) MOR, N/mm 2: 11 MARKING
a) Average 50 30
b) Minimum 45 27 11.1 Each plywood board shall be legibly and indelibly
individua marked or stamped with the following particulars along
with such other marks as the purchaser may stipulate
9.1.8 Retention of Preservative at the time of placing order:
When tested as per IS 2753 (Parts 1 and 2) the plywood a) Manufacturer’s name, initials or recognized
shall have a retention of preservative as specified trade-mark, if any;
in 5.3. b) Year of manufacture;
c) Abbreviations indicating the species of timber
Table 4 Minimum Values for MOE and MOR used in each ply, as indicated in col 4 of
(Wet Bending Strength) Tables 1 and 2;
(Clause 9.1.7)
d) Batch number; and
Sl Requirement Along the Face Across the e) Criteria for which the plywood has been
No. Grain Face Grain
(1) (2) (3) (4)
labelled as ECO-Mark.

i) MOE, N/mm2: 11.2 BIS Certification Marking

a) Average 30750 20000
b) Minimum 30400 10800 The product may also be marked with the Standard
individual Mark.
ii) MOR, N/mm 2:
a) Average 25 15 11.2.1 The use of the Standard Mark is governed by
b) Minimum 22 13 the provisions of Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986
individual
and the Rules and Regulations made thereunder. The
details of conditions under which the licence for the
10 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR use of Standard Mark may be granted to manufacturers
ECO-MARK or producers may be obtained from the Bureau of
Indian Standards.
10.1 General Requirements
10.1.1 The plywood shall conform to the requirements 12 TENDER SAMPLE
of quality specified in this standard. Where samples are required to be tendered, three
10.1.2 The manufacturer shall produce to BIS samples, each not less than 90 mm × 60 mm in size
environmental consent clearance from the concerned shall be submitted by the supplier, and these samples,
State Pollution Control Board as per the provisions of if the tender is accepted, shall constitute the standard
Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 as regards the type of timber, quality and finish.

5
 APPENDIX-2
IS 710 : 2010

9.1.1 Moisture Content se parating the layers. The veneers shall offer
appreciable resistance to separation and the fractured
The moisture content of test pieces cut from each board
sample shall show some adherent fibres distributed
selected as under 9.1 shall not exceed 15 percent nor
more or less uniformly. Adhesion may also be tested
be less than 5 percent when determined by the method
by knife test method described in IS 1734 (Part 5).
described in IS 1734 (Part 1).
NOTE — In case a definite result is not obtainable by the
9.1.2 Glue Adhesion in Dry State method described in IS 1734 (Part 4), the result of knife test
described in IS 1734 (Part 5) shall be considered as decisive.
9.1.2.1 Glue shear strength In case of even number of plies where the grains of central
plies follow the same direction the result as obtained from knife
When tested for glue adhesion by the method described test shall be considered final.
in IS 1734 (Part 4) the average failing load shall be not
less than 1 350 N and no individual value shall be less 9.1.3.2 The specimens shall be subjected to constant
than 1 100 N. steam pressure for a definite duration inside a vacuum
steam pressure test apparatus as described in Annex C
9.1.2.2 Adhesion of plies and thereafter subjected to tests as per 9.1.3.1.1
The adhesion of plies shall be tested by forcibly and 9.1.3.1.2.
separating the layers. The veneers shall offer 9.1.4 Tensile Strength
appreciable resistance to separation and the fractured
samples shall show some adherent fibres distributed The tensile strength when determined by the method
more or less uniformly. Adhesion may also be tested described in IS 1734 (Part 9) shall comply with the
by knife test method described in IS 1734 (Part 5). following values:
NOTE — In case, a definite result is not obtainable by the a) Tensile strength shall be not less than
method described in IS 1734 (Part 4), the result of knife test 42.0 N/mm2 in the direction parallel to grain
described in IS 1734 (Part 5) shall be considered as decisive.
direction of the face veneers,
In case of even number of plies where the grains of central
plies follow the same direction the result as obtained from knife b) Tensile strength shall be not less than
test shall be considered final. 25.0 N/mm2 in the direction of right angles
9.1.3 Water Resistance Test to the grain direction of the face veneers, and
c) Sum of the tensile strength in both directions
The specimens shall be subjected to any one of the shall be not less than 84.5 N/mm2.
tests specified in 9.1.3.1 and 9.1.3.2. The test specimen
for carrying out test as per 9.1.3.1.1, shall be as If the plywood contains scarf joints, half the specimen
specified in IS 1734 (Part 5). Six test pieces each subjected to testing shall contain the joint.
approximately 250 mm × 100 mm, shall be cut from 9.1.5 Mycological Test
any position in the board such that the grain of the
face veneer is parallel to the length of the piece for The test for resistance to micro-organism shall be
carrying out test as per 9.1.3.1.2. carried out by the method described in IS 1734 (Part 7).
When tested the test piece shall show no appreciable
9.1.3.1 The specimens shall be kept submerged in a signs of separation at the edges of the veneers and shall
pan of boiling water for a period of 72 h. The period comply with the requirements specified in 9.1.3.
of 72 h of boiling may be a continuous period or an
aggregate of smaller periods of boiling, if the test piece 9.1.6 Static Bending Strength
is left in cold water between these smaller periods. Three test specimens taken in each direction from the
These test pieces shall then be removed from the boiling sample of plywood, when tested in accordance with
water and cooled down to room temperature by IS 1734 (Part 11) shall have an average and a minimum
plunging them in cold water. These test specimens, individual value of modulus of elasticity and modulus
while still in wet condition, shall be subjected to tests of rupture not less than the values specified in Table 3.
described under 9.1.3.1.1 and 9.1.3.1.2.
9.1.7 Wet Bending Strength
9.1.3.1.1 Glue shear strength
Three test specimen taken in accordance with IS 1734
When tested for glue shear strength by the method (Part 11) and from each direction of a sample of
described in IS 1734 (Part 4), the average failing load plywood, shall be subjected to cyclic test for 3 cycles,
shall be not less than 1 000 N and no individual value each cycle consisting of 4 h boiling in water and 16 h
shall be less than 800 N. drying in an oven at 65 ± 2°C or of 72 h of boiling.
9.1.3.1.2 Adhesion of plies The samples shall be then kept in water at 27 ± 2°C
for 1 h and thereafter tested as per IS 1734 (Part 11).
The adhesion of plies shall be tested by forcibly The duration of boiling/drying in oven may be split