Asian Anthropology

ISSN: 1683-478X (Print) 2168-4227 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/raan20

Introduction: queer lives in contemporary Japan

Sabine Frühstück

To cite this article: Sabine Frühstück (2020) Introduction: queer lives in contemporary Japan,
Asian Anthropology, 19:2, 77-85, DOI: 10.1080/1683478X.2020.1756072

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2020.1756072

Published online: 08 Jun 2020.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 314

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at

https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=raan20
ASIAN ANTHROPOLOGY
2020, VOL. 19, NO. 2, 77–85
https://doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2020.1756072

Introduction: queer lives in contemporary Japan

€hstu
Sabine Fru €ck
Department of East Asian Languages & Cultural Studies, University of California at Santa Barbara,
Santa Barbara, CA, USA

ABSTRACT KEYWORDS
This introduction aims to situate four research articles on “Queer Modern; Japan; queer;
Lives in Contemporary Japan” in the larger field of gender and transgender; X gender
sexuality studies. It argues that, historically, the concepts “queer”
or “transgender” are not particularly novel. Early twentieth-century
progressives in Japan observed and sought social acceptance and
suggested that individuals thought of as “sexually abnormal”
would one day outnumber single-sex/gender men and women.
Yet, the Japan story is more complicated and contradictory than
the notion of a neat progression from the 1920s to our own
moment would suggest. It also has more local and cultural flavor
than the increasingly global sexual rights struggle might indicate.
Ultimately, the introduction highlights the significant self-
conscious individualism and self-determination a broad range of
individuals bring to bear in order to pursue the increasing nor-
malization of queer lives.

Words matter—sometimes more than we think; sometimes less. For the title of this
special feature, the authors settled on “queer (kuia) lives” in order to signify sexual
and gender formations that are neither heterosexual nor “cisgender” (persons whose
identity and gender correspond with their birth sex)—as well as to be inclusive, par-
ticularly of “transgender” and that term’s various inflections in different Japanese com-
munities. In a recent contribution that complicates the notion of “global knowledge”
to the journal Theory, Culture & Society, Constantina Papoulias noted that
The shifting fortunes of the term transgender since the early 1990s testify to the faultlines
and methodological impasses in the theorization of gender across numerous disciplines.
At the same time, transgender marks the forging and transformation of alliances and
collectivities in political activism. Transgender is one of the latest in a series of terms
which, in the social sciences, have sought to name counter-normative materializations of
gender on individual bodies, through practices of gender-crossing either in matters of
dress and presentation, and/or in terms of body modification. (Papoulias 2006, 231–33)

Historically, of course, the concepts “queer” or “transgender” do not seem particu-

larly novel; indeed, early twentieth-century progressives in Japan and elsewhere
observed as much—some even sought social acceptance and normalization therein. In

CONTACT Sabine Fr€uhst€ uck fruhstuck@eastasian.ucsb.edu Department of East Asian Languages & Cultural
Studies, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
ß 2020 The Department of Anthropology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
78 S. FRÜHSTÜCK

Japan in 1922, for instance, Miyatake Gaikotsu, the editor of a collection of stories
titled Thoughts on Hermaphroditism (Hannannyoko ), remarked: “Won’t the hermaphro-
dites that are today called abnormalities someday come to call single-sex men and
women abnormalities?” Note that, though my translation is clumsy, the reductionist
term “hermaphrodites” is nonetheless historically sound. And yet, the editor had in
mind a much looser category encompassing ambiguously sexed individuals that he
described as “half male, half female” (hannannyo)—and physically, mentally or emo-
tionally so (Miyatake 1922 [1986], 325–29).1 Such radical pondering was to be
expected from someone like Miyatake—humorist, activist, author, and publisher of an
astonishingly wide range of works. Much like the editors of Le Charivari in Paris, Punch
in London, and Die Fackel in Vienna, with his Humor Newspaper (Kokkei Shinbun)
Miyatake frequently provoked censorship—only to then mock the censors, whether
those aimed to suppress social and political disorder or to uphold “national moral
health.”2 In other writings, Miyatake had calibrated routine attempts at placating both
the hypocrisy of the Japanese ruling class and the authoritarianism of the regime.
Thoughts on Hermaphroditism was no different.
Covering a wide range of legends, hearsay, and rumors about sexually and genderwise
non-normative individuals, this story collection—printed and distributed “under the
table” with the note “not for sale” next to the copyright information so as to evade cen-
sorship—was intended as much to entertain and scandalize as to lay out “a utopian vision
of a future in which the human race would evolve to complete cultural and physiological
hermaphroditism.”3 The more factual parts of Thoughts on Hermaphroditism echoed the
German physician and sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld’s influential and (mostly) contem-
poraneous writings, including the educational brochure “What Must the Population Need
to Know About the Third Sex?” (Was muss das Volk vom dritten Geschlecht wissen! Eine
Aufkla€rungsschrift), the book Berlin’s Third Sex (Berlins drittes Geschlecht) and the numer-
ous publications of his thoughts and findings on “psychological [or emotional] trans-
sexuality” in his periodical Yearbook of Sexual Intermediate Types (Jahrbuch fu €r sexuelle
Zwischenstufen, 1899–1923), a quarterly publication devoted to scientific, literary, and
political topics related to sexual and gender minorities (Hirschfeld 1904, 1899). From
Miyatake’s Tokyo to Hirschfeld’s Berlin, at the beginning of the twentieth century, an
ever-broader range of medical doctors, intellectuals, scientists, and social reformers con-
sidered questions about and the socially revolutionary potential of recognizing
“intermediate types” beyond the binary gender order and sexual heteronormativity.
Roughly a hundred years since Miyatake first released his Thoughts on
Hermaphroditism, I sometimes ask the students in my history of sexuality course if his
musings had come to fruition, that today (or very soon) the hermaphrodites once seen
as abnormalities would instead be considered normalities. Given that my question is
asked in California, most undergraduates whole-heartedly respond in the affirmative,
very likely reading “cultural and physiological hermaphroditism” as Miyatake would
have wanted: as some version of the advancing dissolution of a binary gender and sex-
ual order; the diversification and decoupling of sexualities and genders; the increased
understanding of sex and gender as fluid and flexible within a spectrum or along a
continuum of modes of being and experiences; and a budding acceptance of sexual
and gender identities being not fixed but fluid and malleable.
 ASIAN ANTHROPOLOGY 79

These students have a point. Even just during the last couple of decades, the ways
different generations in different parts of the world think about and practice sexuality
has remained in flux, including both forward leaps and reactionary backlashes.4 As for
forward leaps, within just the last few years we have observed remarkable changes
regarding sexual rights in some parts of the world. For instance, homosexuality has
become legal in India; Germany and Canada have introduced a third sex for legal docu-
ments; and more countries than ever have legalized same-sex marriage (Frankfurter
Allgemeine 2018; Busby 2017). These developments suggest that an ever-larger percent-
age of the world population—beyond the assumed hold of Euro-American liberalism—
has become more optimistic about the possibilities of overcoming established bounda-
ries of sexual practices and identities. But these progressions have been countered by
some significant conservative strongholds and backlashes. Even though the law is only
rarely enforced, same-sex activities remain illegal and no anti-discrimination protection
exists in Singapore. Though South Africa’s 1996 Bill of Rights was the first in the world
to ban discrimination on the grounds of “sexual orientation,” that country struggles to
align those noble intentions with social, legal, and political practices.5 As I write this,
the United States’ Republican-controlled Senate is still pondering the controversial
Equality Act—passed by the House of Representatives in May 2019—that is designed
to amend the Civil Rights Act to “prohibit discrimination on the basis of the sex, sexual
orientation, gender identity, or pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition of
an individual, as well as because of sex-based stereotypes” (Wikipedia 2020). At the
same time, a number of US states have aggressively turned back the clock on repro-
ductive rights. And though historically Japan has not criminalized same-sex sexuality
(except for a very brief period in the late nineteenth century), the Japanese govern-
ment’s current focus on increasing its dwindling birth rate leaves neglected relevant
pursuits such as the expansion of sexual rights to non-normative individuals.
In short, the (Japan) story is more complicated and contradictory than the notion of
a neat progression from Miyatake’s time to our own moment would suggest. It also has
more local and cultural flavor than the increasingly global sexual rights struggle might
indicate.6 Gender-bending and cross-dressing have been centuries-old practices on and
off the various stages of Japanese theater—from Kabuki to Takarazuka, current-day
incarnations of which were most recently and quite beautifully captured in Graham
Kolbeins’s documentary film Queer Japan (2019). Further off the stage, the gay boom of
the 1990s—in part triggered by Fushimi Noriaki’s biographical book Private Gay Life
(Puraibeto gei raifu posuto renai-ron, 1991) and his magazine Queer Japan (Kuia Japan,
1999–2005)—led to specific segments of current-day popular culture seeing both a
proliferation of representations of same-sex sexuality and a substantial increase in the
elasticity of gender and sexual identity representations—many of which remain uncom-
mon elsewhere in much of the postindustrial world (Fushimi 1991).
In many ways facilitated by the gay boom, the first two decades of the twenty-first
century seem marked by a somewhat smaller but visibly increasing presence of other
LGTBQI þ subcommunities. In 2003 and 2017 respectively, Japanese municipalities
elected the first openly transgender people to public offices: Kamikawa Aya as a
Setagaya ward assembly member and Hosoda Tomoya as a councillor for Iruma City.
Additionally, over the last decade, the foundation of self-help groups, establishment of
80 S. FRÜHSTÜCK

hotlines, and introductory publications about Gender Identity Disorder and X gender
intended for a wide audience have proliferated. For instance, Yoshinaga Michiko—

journalist, prolific author of non-fiction, and recipient of the Oya ichi Nonfiction
So
Award for an earlier book, wrote Gender Identity Disorder: The Future of Sex Change (Sei
doitsusei sho
gai: Sei tenkan no ashita, 2000). Three friends under the leadership of
Mizuno Eita founded the self-help group Label X with the support of crowd funding
and published a collection of essays that address the question, What Is X Gender? The
Status Quo of Diverse Genders/Sexes/Sexualities in Japan (X jenda  tte nani? Nihon ni
okeru tayo  na sei no arikata, 2016). The book is designed to explain the various mean-
ings and experiences of “intersex” to a lay public that remains somewhat confused
about the phenomenon.7 These were essential cultural contributions particularly given
that mainstream television frequently features transgender and transsexual individuals
mostly to sensationalize them in entertaining an audience that ostensibly overwhelm-
ingly identifies as heterosexual and cisgender. Even more problematic, popular televi-
sion tends to pathologize or even criminalize non-normative sexualities and genders,
particularly gay men who don’t appear feminine.8
A similarly contradictory complexity governs the laws and rights for diversely gen-
dered and sexed individuals in Japan. The postwar constitution promulgated on 3
November 1946 guarantees “the essential equality of the sexes” (Article 24). Today,
though sex change is legal, it is governed by the Gender Identity Disorder Act of
2003, which pathologizes the freedom it grants and requires several difficult-to-meet
conditions. As the act’s name indicates, individuals desiring a sex change must first be
diagnosed as having Gender Identity Disorder, and must have “the will to make him-
self or herself physically and socially conform with the opposite sex,” thus reinforcing
binary gender norms (Taniguchi 2013). Furthermore, in February 2019 Japan’s
Supreme Court upheld a law that forces transgender people to undergo full sex-
change surgery—specifically to no longer have functioning reproductive glands—
before having their gender legally registered in the all-important family registry. The
court justified the decision as a way “to avoid sudden disruptions in a society that still
values gender on the basis of biology,” prompting condemnation from activists in
Japan that were chorused by the World Health Organization, the European Human
Rights Court, and Human Rights Watch. The latter called the decision “incompatible
with international human rights standards, against the times, and deviating from best
global practices” (Siripala 2019).
In short, not all is well for members of the highly stratified LGTBQI þ community.
Some groups have created specifically designated semi-public spaces that provide for
a certain level of “being out” while also protecting from the ignorance and scorn of
mainstream society, a majority of which has yet to accommodate a multitude of sexes,
genders, and sexualities. And yet, a number of representative nationwide public opin-
ion surveys show that this mainstream society is somewhat sympathetic to the trans
population. When asked which of a total of 18 human rights issues (plus the catego-
ries “other” and “none in particular”) respondents felt needed attention in Japan, 15
percent of respondents felt that more should be done in Japan to protect the human
rights of “people suffering from Gender Identity Disorder” and “people of certain sex-
ual orientations” (Naikakufu 2017). These replies compared to concern for the human
 ASIAN ANTHROPOLOGY 81

rights of other groups, including “people with disabilities” (51%), “violations of human
rights on the Internet” (43.2%), “the elderly” (36.7%), “children” (33.7%), “women”
(30.6%), and the “survivors of [the triple disaster in Northeastern Japan, referred to as]
3/11” (28.8%). When asked about whether individuals are discriminated against based
on their sexual orientation, almost 40 percent of respondents said that, indeed, dis-
criminatory language was used for non-heteronormative individuals; more than 20
percent of respondents listed how such was used, including “staring and margin-
alizing,” “bullying at school or work,” and “ignorant behavior at school or work.” And
yet, 26 percent said they were not sure any such discrimination existed at all
(Naikakufu 2017).
The rich body of critical studies about genders and sexualities that we know today
has been substantially morphed and reshaped since Miyatake laid out his sexual and
gender utopia in Thoughts on Hermaphroditism. Furthering the scholarship, the essays
that follow these introductory remarks enrich our insights about sexualities and gen-
ders in contemporary Japan, a field of study that has evolved in major ways since the
early folklorists and ethnologists first recorded sexual legends and beliefs around the
turn of the nineteenth century, and since a handful of sexologists first studied sexual
behavior at the beginning of the twentieth. The field has branched into several inter-
disciplinary subfields: a sexual ethnology, which emerged in the late nineteenth cen-
tury and continued to dominate the first few decades of the twentieth; women’s
studies, which rose to prominence after World War II and continues to thrive, and
which traces its roots to the early twentieth-century works of women’s history a la
Yamakawa Kikue’s pioneering Women of the Mito Domain (Buke no josei, 1943); gender
studies, which acknowledge the importance of interrogating in gender and sexual
terms women and femininities as well as men and masculinities; the politically more
determined feminist studies; and the most recently institutionalized LGBTQI þ studies
and queer studies, which occupy much of our current attention despite massive con-
servative strongholds or even backlashes in many areas of gender and sexuality pol-
icy-making in Japan and elsewhere.9
Echoing Miyatake’s prediction, this collection of essays variously provides us with
the personal testimonies of a range of non-heteronormative individuals (Summerhawk,
McMahill, and McDonald 1998; Ito and Yanase 2001; Label X 2016), studies that inter-
rogate the boundaries of onstage and offstage gender performances,10 and offer
insights into the politico-legal struggle for an expansion of (particularly same-)sex
rights and its recent successes, including, in 2015, the recognition of same-sex partner-
ships in some towns and cities in Japan; and, in 2017, the public sector institutional-
ization of anti-discrimination at the workplace legislation based on one’s sexual
orientation and gender identity (Yoshinaga 2000; Capell and Elgebeily 2019). To one
degree or another, these studies have confirmed what Jennifer Robertson articulated
two decades ago: that the “composite character of gender” makes it fundamentally
ambivalent and ambiguous, capable of fluctuating between or being assigned to
more than one referent or category—and thus capable of being read or understood in
more than one way (Robertson 1998, 140).
The pieces assembled here home in on the finely grained experiences of a range of
individuals directly affected by the historical backdrop, contemporary mainstream
82 S. FRÜHSTÜCK

attitudes, and legal frames briefly discussed thus far. Three of the articles describe
how particular trans individuals live their everyday lives while enjoying moderate suc-
cess as members of their respective sexual minority community. The authors take ser-
iously the agentive role of, for the most part, fairly ordinary individuals who might
choose, like anyone else, to hang out at caf e-bars, attend drinking parties, or aim to
be included in the family registry even if its rules formally transform the relationships
they are part of. Yet, these individuals are also, in a range of ways, associated or iden-
tified with the LGBTQI þ community—they make sense of themselves as gendered and
sexual beings, and they negotiate their place within society at large. In highlighting
the diversity of the sexual minority community, these accounts describe how
LGBTQI þ individuals variably embrace self-determination, play with or reject their
identities’ politicization and performative potential, and insist on an ordinariness that
is in some cases sharply distinguished from an intellectual feminism as well as from
commonly glamorizing and spectacularizing media representations.
Three essays contribute to our understanding of how LGTBQI þ individuals engage
the potential of non-heteronormativity and render its productivity. The fourth consti-
tutes a critical analysis of the family registry through the lens of “institutional perform-
ativity.” The very everydayness of the scenes described in two of the pieces—Shu Min
Yuen’s “Unqueer Queers: Drinking Parties and Negotiations of Cultural Citizenship by
Female-to-Male Trans People in Japan” and Michelle H. S. Ho’s “Refusing Queer:
Contemporary Danso  (Female to Male Crossdressing) Culture in Tokyo”—contrasts
with Adrienne Renee Johnson’s “Joso  or ‘Gender Free’? Playfully Queer ‘Lives’ in Visual
Kei,” whose players aim to “tak[e] down a binary sex-gender system without becoming
one themselves.” Despite these differences and distinctions, suggests SPF Dale in her
contribution on “Same-sex Marriage and the Question of Queerness: Institutional
Performativity and Marriage in Japan,” at the bottom of it all lies the enduring power
of the family registry system, which governs how the LGTBQI þ community live and
make sense of their lives.
In “Unqueer Queers: Drinking Parties and Negotiations of Cultural Citizenship by
Female-to-Male Trans People in Japan,” Shu Min Yuen considers individuals who reject
politicized categories and identities, or who are at least disinclined to widen their
push for acceptance into a larger sociopolitical project. Indeed, many of them insist
on a kind of radical ordinariness and embrace lives which conform to the expectations
of gender-normative men driven by their will to “fit into society as gender normative
men.” They live their days across a public space where they live heteronormative lives
aligned with their biological sex, and a hybridized private/public space, where they
enjoy—in rather heteronormative ways—their being trans, together with both fellow
trans individuals and other variously gendered and sexed ones. Rather than seeing
this bifurcation of their experiential space as confining, they instead embrace it.
In “Refusing Queer,” Michelle H. S. Ho discusses the results of her research in a
Tokyo female-to-male crossdressing cafe, where individuals embody variants of com-
posite genders. In so doing, they not only reject political activism and
LGTBQI þ identities as represented in the public sphere—particularly television and
popular culture at large—they also insist on a radical ordinariness that one of them
articulated, somewhat antisocially and apolitically, as “I am me.” Identity, of course, is
 ASIAN ANTHROPOLOGY 83

most vigorously expressed “in the face of oppression,” making it impertinent “to
address the criticism of identity to those whose existence is threatened” (Wieseltier
1996, 14). Ho’s cross-dressers have no such experience of discrimination; as such, they
do not actively aim to achieve wider recognition or identity—or at least they do not
appear to.
Adrienne Renee Johnson offers readers a different scene. In “Joso  or ‘Gender Free’?
Playfully Queer ‘Lives’ in Visual Kei,” Visual Kei gender benders (mostly joyfully) “[mix]
conflicting gender and sexual signs” in an overall effort to intervene in and glamorize
“incoherences in the allegedly stable relations between chromosomal sex, gender, and
sexual desire.” As such their queerness is playful and experimental; they live lives that
Johnson describes as being “open to others” while also being both comparatively safe
from mainstream criticism and separate from strict identity politics.
On and off the musical stage or, indeed, any other platform, the family registry
remains closely intertwined with individuals’ most intimate decisions and self-percep-
tions. This is what SPF Dale proclaims in her essay on “Same-sex Marriage and the
Question of Queerness: Institutional Performativity and Marriage in Japan.” In most of
Japan it is not possible for a same-sex couple to marry. And yet, one partner in a
queer relationship can legally adopt the other as a son or daughter (regardless of their
age difference), thus forming a family unit that can be definitively recorded in the
family registry. This legal option, ironically, enables a queering of people’s lives and
identities despite the family registry’s reactionary conservatism.
Collectively, these four essays are yet another testament to the advancing normal-
ization of queer existence achieved in the century following Miyatake’s prediction—as
well as to the significant self-conscious individualism and self-determination a broad
range of individuals can bring to bear in order to pursue it.

Notes
1. Here I follow Teresa A. Algoso’s critical analysis of the text; see Algoso (2006).
2. “National moral health” was high up on the agenda of the modernizing colonial regime
and had numerous dimensions, including political and sexual ones. See, for instance,
€hstu
Fru €ck (2003).
3. For a close reading of Gaikotsu’s Thoughts on Hermaphroditism, see Algoso (2006, 558).
4. Germany is one of the first countries worldwide that introduced the designation “diverse”
as a third option for the birth registry (Allgemeine 2018) while Canada was the first
country in the Americas to allow its citizens to use an “X” category, joining those in
Australia, Denmark, Germany, Malta, New Zealand, and Pakistan. India, Ireland, and Nepal
are among the countries that provide various third-options (Busby 2017).
5. For situating Japan’s modern sexual history within a longue duree and within a global
frame respectively, see Fr€
uhst€
uck (2005) and (2014).
6. There is a growing body of scholarship that examines the global dimensions of political
activism around LGBTQI þ matters. See, for instance, Capell and Elgebeily (2019), Martin
et al. (2010).
7. It should be noted that this is based on a small sample of 239 students at Miyazaki
International College, Miyazaki City, with an n of 153; see Lusk (2017).
8. In the Anglo-American sphere, Mark McLelland has most consistently traced the history of
queer activism in numerous important monographs and anthologies, including McLelland
(2005), McLelland and Dasgupta (2005), McLelland, Suganuma, and Welker (2007), and
McLelland and Mackie (2014).
84 S. FRÜHSTÜCK

9. For a detailed history of the field of sexuality and gender studies with regards to Japan,
see Fr€
uhst€
uck (2005).
10. Most central to these debates is Robertson 1998; see also the numerous other publications
by the same author.

Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes on contributor
Sabine Fru€hstu€ck is the Koichi Takashima Chair and Professor of modern Japanese cultural stud-
ies in the Department of East Asian Languages & Cultural Studies at the University of California,
Santa Barbara. Broadly interested in the study of modern and contemporary Japanese culture
and its place in the world, she is the author of Colonizing Sex: Sexology and Social Control in
Modern Japan (University of California Press, 2003), Uneasy Warriors: Gender, Memory and
Popular Culture in the Japanese Army (University of California Press, 2007), and Playing War:
Children and the Paradoxes of Modern Militarism in Japan (University of California Press, 2017).
€hstu
Fru €ck is currently completing a volume on gender and sexuality in modern Japan which is
under contract for the New Approaches to Asian History series of Cambridge University Press.

References
Algoso, Teresa A. 2006. “Thoughts on Hermaphroditism’: Miyatake Gaikotsu and the Convergence
 Japan.” The Journal of Asian Studies 65 (3): 555–573. www.jstor.org/stable/
of the Sexes in Taisho
25076081. doi:10.1017/S0021911806001136.
Allgemeine, Frankfurter. 2018. “Bundestag stimmt f€ ur drittes Geschlecht im Geburtenregister.”
14 December 2018. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/kuenftig-drittes-geschlecht-im-
geburtenregister-waehlbar-15941127.html.
Busby, Mattha. 2017. “Canada Introduces Gender-Neutral ‘X’ Option on Passports.” Guardian (UK
edition), 31 August 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/31/canada-introduces-
gender-neutral-x-option-on-passports.
Capell, Ben, and Sherif A. Elgebeily. 2019. “Lessons from Gay and Lesbian Activism in Asia: The
Importance of Context, Pivotal Incidents and Connection to a Larger Vision.” Sexuality &
Culture 23 (3): 882–905. doi:10.1007/s12119-019-09597-4.
Fr€
uhst€uck, Sabine. 2003. Colonizing Sex: Sexology and Social Control in Modern Japan. Berkeley:
University of California Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/109.4.1210.
€hstu
Fru €ck, Sabine. 2005. “Genders and Sexualities.” In Companion to the Anthropology of Japan,
edited by Jennifer Robertson, 167–182. London: Blackwell.
Fr€
uhst€uck, Sabine. 2014. “Sexuality and Nation States.” In Global History of Sexuality, edited by
Robert Marshall Buffington, Eithne Luibheid, and Donna Guy, 17–56. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Taniguchi, Hiroyuki. 2013. “Japan’s 2003 Gender Identity Disorder Act: The Sex Reassignment
Surgery, No Marriage, and No Child Requirements as Perpetuations of Gender Norms in
Japan.” Asia-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 14 (2): 108–117. http://blog.hawaii.edu/aplpj/files/
2013/02/APLPJ_14.2_Taniguchi.pdf.
Hirschfeld, Magnus. 1899. Jahrbuch f€ ur sexuelle Zwischenstufen mit besonderer Ber€ucksichtigung
der Homosexualita €t [Yearbook of Sexual Intermediate Types with Special Consideration of
Homosexuality]. Leipzig: Verlag von Max Spohr.
Hirschfeld, Magnus. 1901. Was muss das Volk vom dritten Geschlecht wissen! Eine Aufkla €rungsschrift,
edited by Wissenschaftlich-Humanit€ares Comitee. Leipzig: Verlag von Max Spohr.
Hirschfeld, Magnus. 1904. Berlins drittes Geschlecht. Leipzig: Verlag Rosa Winkel.
Ito, Satoru, and Yanase Ryuta. 2001. Coming out in Japan. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
 ASIAN ANTHROPOLOGY 85

Label X., ed. 2016. X Jenda  Tte Nani? Nihon ni Okeru Tayo  na Sei No Arikata [What is XGender?
the Current State of Gender Diversity in Japan]. To kyo
: Ryokuf
u shuppan.
Lusk, Jeniece. 2017. “Japanese Millennials and Intersex Awareness.” Sexuality & Culture 21 (2):
613–626. doi:10.1007/s12119-017-9407-0.
Martin, Fran, and Peter Jackson, Mark McLelland, and Audrey Yue, eds. 2010. AsiaPacifiQueer:
Rethinking Genders and Sexualities. Indianapolis: University of Illinois Press.
McLelland, Mark, and Romit Dasgupta, eds. 2005. Genders, Transgenders, and Sexualities in Japan.
New York: Routledge.
McLelland, Mark, and Vera Mackie, eds. 2014. Routledge Handbook of Sexuality Studies in East
Asia. New York: Routledge.
McLelland, Mark, Katsuhiko Suganuma, and James Welker, eds. 2007. Queer Voices from Japan:
First Person Narratives from Japan’s Sexual Minorities. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
McLelland, Mark. 2005. Queer Japan from the Pacific War to the Internet Age. Lanham, MD:
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Yoshinaga, Michiko. 2000. Sei Do itsuseio
gai: Seitenkan No Ashita. To kyo: Shueisha. doi:10.1086/
ahr/11.1.128.
Naikakufu. 2017. “Zenkoku yoron cho sa no genky u.” Accessed 28 August 2019. https://survey.gov-
online.go.jp/genkyou/h27/h26-genkyou/index.html
Naikakufu. 2017. “Zenkoku yoron cho sa no genky u.” Accessed 28 August 2019. https://survey.gov-
online.go.jp/h24/h24-jinken/zh/z20.html
Fushimi, Noriaki. 1991. Puraibeto Gei Raifu Posuto Renai-Ron—Private Gay Life. To kyo
: Gakuyo 
shobo .
Papoulias, Constantina. 2006. “Transgender.” Special Issue on “Problematizing Global
Knowledge.” Theory, Culture & Society 23 (2–3): 231–233. doi:10.1177/026327640602300250.
Robertson, Jennifer. 1998/2001. Takarazuka: Sexual Politics and Popular Culture in Modern Japan.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Siripala, Thisanka. 2019. “Japan’s Supreme Court Upholds Surgery as Necessary Step for Official
Gender Change.” Diplomat, 5 February 2019. https://thediplomat.com/2019/02/japans-
supreme-court-upholds-surgery-as-necessary-step-for-official-gender-change/.
Summerhawk, Barbara, Cheiron McMahill, and Darren McDonald. 1998. Queer Japan: Personal
Stories of Japanese Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals and Transsexuals. Norwich: New Victorian
Publishers.
Wieseltier, Leon. 1996. Against Identity. New York: William Drenttel.
Wikipedia. 2020. “Equality Act (United States).” Last modified 24 February 2020. https://en.wiki-
pedia.org/wiki/Equality_Act_(United_States).