Series Parallel Cascaded H-Bridge Inverter Based On A Simlpe Staircase Modulation
Series Parallel Cascaded H-Bridge Inverter Based On A Simlpe Staircase Modulation
Series Parallel Cascaded H-Bridge Inverter Based On A Simlpe Staircase Modulation
Abstract—This paper presents the main types of a series- The attractive features of multilevel inverters can be
parallel cascaded H-bridge inverter. It consists of H-bridge summarized as follows: they can generate output voltage
cells, and an inverter which output is a multilevel voltage by with extremely low distortion and lower compared to
adding the dc voltage sources in series and parallel. A simple
staircase modulation is used to obtain on-off of transistors used conventional two-level inverters at the same switching
in series-parallel H-bridge multilevel inverter. The modulation frequency; the blocking voltage of each switch is clamped to
technique used in this paper can calculate the independent a divided capacitor link voltage level and they generate a
switching angles more simply than the traditional method, and smaller common mode (CM) voltage, thus reduce motor
can be applied to all kinds of multilevel inverters. The bearing stresses. In addition, by using sophisticated
proposed inverter topology results from implementation of modulation methods, any CM voltage can be eliminated [8,
optimum switching angles in low total harmonic distortion 9]. The main disadvantages of the multilevel inverters are:
values in the phase and line voltage waveforms. The circuit they require a large number of diodes; control becomes
configuration, theoretical operation, is also discussed in this complex with an increased number of levels; several DC
paper. PSIM, PROTEUS-V8 based simulation results are voltages are required, which are usually provided by
obtained, which are consistent with the experimental results. capacitors and balancing the capacitor voltage is a challenge
[10].
Keywords—multilevel inverter, series-parallel H-bridge
inverter, staircase modulation, angle level control Cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverters (CHB-MLIs) are
sub-divided into two types: equal DC source and unequal
I. INTRODUCTION DC source. The major disadvantage of CHB-MLIs is that
Few years ago, the power electronics converters they require a greater number of power semiconductor
became the important types of electrical technology, switches devices. Each switch needs a concerning gate drive
because it used in all aspects of life applications such as and protection circuits. This implies that the universal
residential, commercial, industrial, transportation, utility system to be more expensive and complex.
systems, aerospace and telecommunications systems[1, 2] To avoid this drawback of CHB-MLIS the series-parallel
.A DC to AC converter is also called an inverter, and it is cascaded H-bridge will be used for power applications [7,
divided into two types, two-level inverter and multilevel 11-13].
inverters. A voltage source inverter that produces voltage
levels 0 or is called a two-level inverter. To obtain Control strategies of a multilevel inverter are shown in
high-quality output voltage or current of this type of inverter Fig.1. Pulse width modulation techniques and selective
requires high switching frequencies (3 kHz-10 kHz). In harmonic elimination that are used in series-parallel
high-voltage applications, the two-level inverter has cascaded H-ridge inverter are difficult and complicated [13-
limitations, mainly due to switching losses, switching device 16].
voltage rating constraints, and high electromagnetic In this paper a simple staircase modulation is used to
interference (EMI)[3] . In response to a growing demand obtain on-off of transistors used in series-parallel H-bridge
for high-power inverters, multilevel inverters have attracted multilevel inverter. The contribution in this work is that
attention from academia as well as industry. Among the the proposed staircase modulation technique calculates the
best-known topologies are: the diode clamped inverter, the independent switching angles more simply than the
flying capacitor inverter and the H-bridge cascade inverter traditional methods.
[4-7]. The benefit of these circuits is to obtain a better high-
voltage waveform using low voltage switching devices. As II. SERIES PARALLEL H-BRIDGE INVERTER
the rule, series connected devices are switched sequentially,
generating an output voltage modality which contains A. Series Parallel H-bridge Inverter with Equal DC source
defined discrete steps. The general multilevel inverter The circuit configuration of a single-phase L Levels
structure is used to obtain a sinusoidal voltage from several Series Parallel H-bridge -MLI with equal DC sources is
voltage levels, typically capacitor voltage sources. shown in Fig.2, Fig.3 and Fig.4 respectively. The
Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad Autonoma de Occidente. Downloaded on July 22,2020 at 17:51:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
relationship between levels of inverters and the number of The total number of the devices (IGBT) used in a Series
DC source (Single-phase H-bridge) is given by: Parallel H-bridge-MLI with an unequal DC source can be
given by:
(1)
(5)
Vdc
Multilevel Inverter Control strategies
S1 S3
Vdc S a1
Vdc S b1 /RDG
Sa 2
Fundamental Switching Frequency High Switching Frequency PWM
Sb2 S4 S2
nearest level Selective Harmonic Space Vector Selective Harmonic Sinusoidal Vdc San
control Elimination PWM Elimination PWM PWM S bn
Alternative Phase
Phase opposite
opposite disposition In-phase disposition
disposition A
Vdc T11 T31
Fig. 1. Control strategies of multilevel inverters.
VH 1
Vdc T41
where M is the number of dc source in cells. The levels L of Ta1 T21
the inverter are constantly odd number for the Series- Tb1
Parallel H-bridge-MLI. The phase voltage of the Series-
Parallel H-bridge-MLI is given by: H1
T1 2 T32
(2) Vdc
Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad Autonoma de Occidente. Downloaded on July 22,2020 at 17:51:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
.
A A
A
T11 T31 T11 T31
Vdc T11 T31 Vdc Vdc
T41 VH1 VH1
T21
T41 T21
Vdc VH 1
Ta1 T41 T21 H1 H1
Tb1 2Vdc T T 3Vdc T12 T32
12 32
H1
2Vdc T T VH 2 3Vdc Ta2 VH2
Vdc T12 T32 T22
T42 T22
a2 T 42 Tb 2
b2
VH2 H2 H2
Vdc T T 42 T22
a2
Tb 2 N
N b- Level 15
a- Level 11
H2
Vdc T13 T33
A A
T11 T31 T11 T31
Vdc T VH3
a3
Tb3
T43 T23 V dc
VH1 Vdc
VH1
T41 T21 T41 T21
H1 H1
H3 2Vdc T12 T32 T12 T32
Vdc 3Vdc
S1 2Vdc Ta2 VH2 VH2
S3 T42 T T42 T22
Tb2 22
H2
Vdc Sa1 H2
4Vdc T13 T 9Vdc T13 T33
Vdc S b1 VHN
33
Sa2 T43 T23 V 9Vdc Ta 3
VH3
4Vdc Ta3 H3 Tb 3
T43 T23
Tb 3
Sb 2
S4 S2 H3 H3
Vdc San S N N N
bn c- Level 27
d- Level 45
Fig. 4. Proposed topology of series-parallel H-bridge inverter with equal Fig. 5. Topology samples of series-parallel H-bridge inverter with unequal
DC source and horizental-vertical increase.. DC source.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad Autonoma de Occidente. Downloaded on July 22,2020 at 17:51:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
III. STAIRCASE MODULATION TECHNIQUE shown in Fig.5 for 11, 15, 27 and 45 levels of series-parallel
cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter. Table I presents the
The principle of the method used in this paper is shown number of angles and THD for all. Fig7 to Fig.10 shows the
in Fig.6. The inverter phase voltage is created by a fifteen- PSIM simulation of the phase voltage 11-level, 15-level, 27-
level inverter. level and 45-level series-parallel cascaded H-bridge inverter
with unequal DC sources.
13Vdc 2
11Vdc 2
9Vdc 2
7Vdc 2
5Vdc 2
3Vdc 2
Vdc 2
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 T13 T14
Fig. 6. Simple staircase modulation technique. Fig. 7. Phase voltage of the 11-level series parallel cascaded H-bridge
inverter with unequal DC sources.
The method’s algorithm relies on the fact that the
inverter phase voltage intersects with an original sinusoidal
waveform at equal points on the y-axis. It can be clearly
seen from g
Fig.6 that these equal points
are . Thus, angles
to can be calculated by:
(6)
(7)
(8) Fig. 8. Phase voltage of the 15-level series parallel cascaded H-bridge
inverter with unequal DC sources.
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(14)
Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad Autonoma de Occidente. Downloaded on July 22,2020 at 17:51:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
TABLE I. NUMBER OF ANGLES AND THD OF SOME SELECTIVE LEVEL microcontroller (PIC16F877A) was used to produce the
accurate gating signals at each calculated angle by using the
NUMBER OF ANGLES FOR HALF timer and interrupting modules of the microcontroller to
INVERTER LEVEL THD generate the gating signal at pre-calculated times related to
PERIOD ( ) the calculated angles.
11 5 7.59% The MOSFT Driver (IR2112) was utilized to amplify or
boost the 5V gating signal from the microcontroller to a
15 7 5.5% level that is required by the MOSFET power transistor.
27 13 3.02% The MOSFET Power transistor (IRF450) was also used
45 22 1.84%
as main building block of the H-bridge inverter cells. DC
power supply was used to provide the required power of the
circuit items. As aforementioned, the microcontroller used
V. COMPARISON WITH OTHER STRATEGIES micro C language. The voltage phase of the experimental
Control technology strategies of multilevel inverters are result of a fifteen-level series-parallel H-bridge inverter is
divided into two types: fundamental switching frequency shown in Fig. 12.
and high-frequency switching frequency. Until now, High-
frequency switching frequency for cascaded H-bridge with
unequal DC source has no direct rule. On the other hand, the
main types of fundamental switching frequency are selective
harmonic elimination (SHE) and nearest level control
(NLC).
In selective harmonic elimination method if the levels of
the inverter increase implied that the numbers of equation
also will be increasing, which lead more difficulty and
complication to solve these equations by using a numerical
method [17-21]. Nearest level control method is easier than
selective harmonic elimination, but it needs two signals to
calculate the angles [22-27].
The method proposed in this paper is simple and easy to
calculate the angles of transistors than compared to the other
two types. Based on the analysis given in the preceding
sections, the features and drawbacks for the selective
harmonic elimination, nearest level control and simple
staircase modulation (SSM) discussed in this paper are Fig. 11. Experimental prototype of a fifteen levels with unequal DC
summarized in Table II. sources.
No of equation
Two Only one
per level (m)
Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad Autonoma de Occidente. Downloaded on July 22,2020 at 17:51:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
VII. CONCLUSION
In this paper, a simple staircase modulation for [15] F. Blaabjerg, M. Liserre, and K. Ma, "Power electronics converters
multilevel inverters was discussed and was applied to a for wind turbine systems," IEEE Transactions on Industry
Applications, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 708-719, 2012.
series-parallel H-bridge multi-level inverter with unequal
[16] G. M. SUBARNAN and J. Venugopal, "Control of a ternary
DC sources. A series-parallel configuration inverter is voltage progression based cascaded multilevel inverter using classy
used to reduce the number of switches and to obtain split multicarrier pulse width modulation," Turkish Journal of
output has low total harmonics distortion. This Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, vol. 24, no. 5, pp.
configuration of the inverter is simulated with the help of 3910-3923, 2016.
PSIM- and PROTEUS software’s. The modulation [17] M. S. Dahidah, G. Konstantinou, and V. G. Agelidis, "A review of
technique is applied for 45, 27, 15 and 11 level. A better multilevel selective harmonic elimination PWM: formulations,
solving algorithms, implementation and applications," IEEE
result with reasonable THD is obtained. The proposed Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 4091-4106,
inverter in this paper can be used to produce more number 2015.
of voltage levels with the same number of power [18] R. P. Aguilera et al., "Selective harmonic elimination model
semiconductor devices compared to the other types of predictive control for multilevel power converters," IEEE
inverters. Subsequently, the size and power consumption Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 2416-2426,
of driving circuit of the proposed inverter are reduced. In 2017.
this paper, the experimental results of fifteen -level series- [19] K. Yang, Q. Zhang, R. Yuan, W. Yu, J. Yuan, and J. Wang,
"Selective harmonic elimination with Groebner bases and
parallel inverter with unequal DC were matched with the symmetric polynomials," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
computer simulation results. vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 2742-2752, 2016.
[20] K. Yang et al., "Unified selective harmonic elimination for
REFERNCES multilevel converters," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
[1] O. H. Abdalla and M. Han, "Variable speed pumped storage based vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 1579-1590, 2017.
on the use of H-bridge cascaded multilevel converter," in Power [21] M. A. Memon, S. Mekhilef, M. Mubin, and M. Aamir, "Selective
Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC), 2012 7th harmonic elimination in inverters using bio-inspired intelligent
International, 2012, vol. 1: IEEE, pp. 402-405. algorithms for renewable energy conversion applications: A
[2] M. H. Rashid, Power electronics handbook. Butterworth- review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017.
Heinemann, 2017. [22] T. V. Kiran and N. Babji, "Design of a novel cost effective
[3] T. Honade, S. Udapure, S. Timande, S. Rodge, V. Burde, and S. cascaded H-Bridge multilevel inverter topology," in 2016
Gudadhe, "Comparative study between two and three level International Conference on Signal Processing,
converter for electric application," International Journal of Communication, Power and Embedded System (SCOPES), 2016:
Advances in Engineering & Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 210, IEEE, pp. 726-731.
2016. [23] S. Kouro, R. Bernal, H. Miranda, C. A. Silva, and J. Rodríguez,
[4] N. Sandeep and U. R. Yaragatti, "Design and implementation of a "High-performance torque and flux control for multilevel inverter
sensorless multilevel inverter with reduced part count," IEEE fed induction motors," IEEE Transactions on Power electronics,
Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 6677-6683, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 2116-2123, 2007.
2017. [24] J. Kumar, "Performance analysis of H-Bridge multilevel inverter
[5] A. Hota, S. Jain, and V. Agarwal, "An optimized three-phase using Selective Harmonic Elimination and Nearest Level Control
multilevel inverter topology with separate level and phase sequence technique," in Electrical, Electronics, Signals, Communication and
generation part," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 32, Optimization (EESCO), 2015 International Conference on, 2015:
no. 10, pp. 7414-7418, 2017. IEEE, pp. 1-5.
[6] A. Chitra, J. Vanishree, S. Sreejith, S. Jose, and A. J. Pulickan, [25] P. M. Meshram and V. B. Borghate, "A simplified nearest level
"Performance Comparison of Multilevel Inverter Topologies for control (NLC) voltage balancing method for modular multilevel
Closed Loop v/f Controlled Induction Motor Drive," Energy converter (MMC)," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.
Procedia, vol. 117, pp. 958-965, 2017. 30, no. 1, pp. 450-462, 2015.
[7] K. K. Gupta, A. Ranjan, P. Bhatnagar, L. K. Sahu, and S. Jain, [26] Y.-H. Park, D.-H. Kim, J.-H. Kim, and B.-M. Han, "A New
"Multilevel inverter topologies with reduced device count: a Scheme for Nearest Level Control with Average Switching
review," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 31, no. 1, Frequency Reduction for Modular Multilevel Converters," Journal
pp. 135-151, 2016. of Power Electronics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 522-531, 2016.
[8] J. Rodriguez, J.-S. Lai, and F. Z. Peng, "Multilevel inverters: a [27] J. Pereda and J. Dixon, "High-frequency link: a solution for using
survey of topologies, controls, and applications," IEEE only one DC source in asymmetric cascaded multilevel inverters,"
Transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 724-738, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 58, no. 9, pp.
2002. 3884-3892, 2011.
[9] Y.-M. Park, H.-S. Ryu, H.-W. Lee, M.-G. Jung, and S.-H. Lee,
"Design of a cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter based on power
electronics building blocks and control for high performance,"
Journal of Power Electronics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 262-269, 2010.
[10] B. Wu and M. Narimani, High-power converters and AC drives.
John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
[11] Y. Hinago and H. Koizumi, "A switched-capacitor inverter using
series/parallel conversion with inductive load," IEEE Transactions
on Industrial Electronics, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 878-887, 2012.
[12] E. Babaei and S. H. Hosseini, "New cascaded multilevel inverter
topology with minimum number of switches," Energy Conversion
and Management, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 2761-2767, 2009.
[13] C. I. Odeh, "Cascaded half-full-bridge PWM multilevel inverter
configuration," Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering &
Computer Sciences, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2071-2083, 2016.
[14] O. H. Abdalla and M. Han, "Power electronics converters for
variable speed pump storage," International Journal of Power
Electronics and Drive Systems, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 74, 2013.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad Autonoma de Occidente. Downloaded on July 22,2020 at 17:51:10 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.