Conservation, Utilization and Management of Forest Genetic Resources in The Philippines
Conservation, Utilization and Management of Forest Genetic Resources in The Philippines
Conservation, Utilization and Management of Forest Genetic Resources in The Philippines
R. B. Aguda [6]
Introduction
It is well known and recorded that the forests of Southeast Asia, including those of the
Philippines, are the most biodiverse terrestrial ecosystems on Earth. These forests,
however, face serious threats from social and economic development. The factors that
contribute to forest loss and degradation include shifting cultivation, cash cropping, firewood
collection, livestock grazing, unsustainable logging and anthropogenic fires intensified by
exceptional droughts. The underlying causes of forest problems are poverty, over-
population, inequitable land tenure regimes, misguided policies, weak governments and
debt burdens.
The Philippine government is aware of the uniqueness and exceptional diversity of the
country's forests. Appreciation is also growing of the role of forest genetic resources in
sustaining the productive and protective values of forests, and the need to conserve these
resources. Strong economic reasons lie behind this appreciation. A large number of tree
species in the Philippines are harvested for their timber and, to a lesser extent, non-wood
products such as bark, resin, tannin and medicinal compounds. Forest product exports
make an important contribution to the Philippine economy. In future, ecotourism and genetic
resources are likely to play a much greater economic role. The number of tree species
being exploited is not known, but given their value and the threats they face, conservation
efforts must be strengthened considerably.
In terms of its social and economic impacts, forest management in the Philippines has
passed through two stages and is entering a third. In stage one, large areas of forest were
converted to farmland to support a growing population. In stage two, the country sought to
augment agricultural development by developing an industrial economy based largely on
natural resources. Forest exploitation accelerated during this stage, resulting in a logging
boom. Faced with diminishing forest resources, local forest-based industries were forced to
diversify or go out of business. In the third, and current, stage, concerted efforts are being
made to reverse the decline in forest area and quality, and protect the country's remaining
natural forests.
The contribution of forestry to the Philippine economy has been eroded by massive
deforestation during the past two decades. Pressure from a growing population, demands
for agricultural land, urbanization and logging are among the reasons behind forest loss.
Poor planning and execution of forest management programmes, weak enforcement of
forest laws, political pressures, inadequate policies for forest protection and development,
and the low priority historically given to forest conservation and environmental protection
have exacerbated deforestation and frustrated attempts to solve forest problems.
The Philippines once had an abundant cover of forests. As late as 1989, 15 million hectares
or half of the country's land area was still classified as forest. According to the latest forest
inventory (1998), the area of forest has now declined to about 6.7 million hectares (Table 1).
Table 1. Land use and forest types in the Philippines, 1998. Source: 1998 Philippine Forest
Statistics.
The optimal area of forest for the Philippines is believed to be about 12 million hectares, or
40% of the land area. Given that only 6.7 million hectares are currently forested, this means
that an additional 5.3 million hectares of land must be reforested. To achieve this goal, the
government is implementing a Master Plan for Forestry Development that aims to reverse
deforestation, conserve all virgin (old-growth) forests and manage residual forests and
plantations efficiently and sustainably.
The Philippine government aims to meet its reforestation targets by cooperating with
various sectors of society. Private sector plantations will focus on timber production.
Government plantations will rehabilitate degraded forest areas and protect watersheds. The
National Forestation Programme (NFP) aims to reforest 100,000ha each year.
A shortage in wood supply is expected if not enough plantations are established, even
under Master Plan conditions (Table 2). Even if a total logging ban is effective, the projected
raw material demand of wood-based industries in 2015 can only be met through plantations.
Additional reasons for urgently establishing forest plantations in the Philippines are:
Enough land exists in the Philippines to establish plantations to supply future demand
(Table 3). Potential plantation areas, which are scattered across the Philippine archipelago,
are defined as open, denuded or inadequately stocked lands on slopes not exceeding 50%,
for which there are no other uses. Considerable potential also exists to establish plantations
on alienable and disposable lands that are currently lying idle, in areas with slopes less than
30%.
Table 3. Suitable areas for establishing production plantations, by slope. Included areas are
80% of all grassland and brushland; 30% of all land under extensive land use; and 10% of
residual forests (inadequately stocked logged-over areas). Source: DENR/MPFD land-use
database.
There is now also strong political will to involve upland dwellers and non-governmental
organizations in establishing and managing tree plantations. Some of the important
programmes in this regard are:
Tree planting contracts with forest dwellers on land under stewardship contracts, as
a part of the community-based forest management project;
Industrial Forest Management Agreements (IFMA);
Reforestation as a part of the Timber License Agreements (TLA) issued to private
individuals or corporations involved in forest utilization; and
Forest Land Management Agreements (FLMA), which give households and
community contractors the right to harvest what they have planted.
Tree improvement and genetic resource conservation activities in the Philippines take place
under national reforestation programmes, but are not clearly defined. Breeding of forest
trees has historically been underemphasized, owing to a preference for natural regeneration
methods such as seed trees for pines and selective logging for dipterocarps. Changes in
environmental and socio-economic conditions, however, have promoted more intensive
plantation approaches that require specific tree improvement and genetic resource
conservation efforts.
In situ conservation
As early as 1930, legislation was passed to prevent logging of four leguminous timber tree
species; namely, supa (Sindora supa), akle (Albizia acle), tindalo (Afzelia rhomboidea) and
ipil (Intsia bijuga), as well as a non-legume, Vitex parviflora. Harvesting of an indigenous
legume, narra (Pterocarpus indicus), and of any dipterocarp species from virgin forest for
log export, have also been regulated.
The plant genetic resources of a country are assets that should be protected by clear
national policies on their conservation and use. The sustainable use of each production
forest or management unit in the Philippines varies according to size, shape, species
composition, concentration of endemic species and so on. The conservation value of any
given area is reflected in its management objectives and the quality of management.
Because the conservation of forest genetic resources is fundamental to the sustainable and
productive management of forest ecosystems, in situconservation efforts should be
reinforced.
The main strategy for protecting and conserving biodiversity in the Philippines is the
establishment of an integrated protected area system (IPAS). The IPAS was set up to
protect and preserve a representative sample of all ecosystems and habitat types in the
country, as well as their plant and animal species. Executive Order 192 created the Parks
and Wildlife Bureau to consolidate government efforts to conserve biological diversity in the
protected area system.
In June 1992, Republic Act No. 7586, otherwise known as the National Integrated Protected
Area Systems (NIPAS) Law, was passed. The law, which is being implemented by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), has the following special
features:
It requires the designation of a buffer zone to stabilize protected areas whenever and
wherever applicable;
It recognizes ancestral rights and includes community interests with concern for
socioeconomic development;
It requires the development of standard planning for site-specific management;
It establishes the Integrated Protected Areas Fund (IPAF), a trust fund which will
form the basis of a sustained financing system; and
It adopts a decentralized system of protected area management.
By 1999, 76 protected areas had been established under the NIPAS Law. The regional
offices of DENR, its Community Environment and Natural Resources Offices, and provincial
Environment and Natural Resources Offices have also identified 25 old-growth and mossy
forests for inclusion in the IPAS.
Plus trees are being selected continuously across the Philippine archipelago. The criteria for
selection are based on morphology and resistance to pests and diseases, but there have
been few attempts to propagate the selected trees in nurseries. In 1991, plus trees from 23
species in eight administrative regions of the country were selected. Thirty-eight seed
production areas (SPA) have been identified and documented. The Forest Management
Bureau (FMB) has also identified 61 seed production areas for 19 tree species. Plans to
improve the genetic composition of these SPAs are under development. Although seed is
being collected from selected plus trees and SPAs, a system to monitor the transfer of
germplasm and its performance after planting is not yet in place.
Ex situ conservation
There have been several ex situ conservation projects and programmes in the Philippines.
Seed orchards of various species have been established in several parts of the country
under both private and government initiatives. In most cases, however, these orchards have
been abandoned because of a lack of funds or trained personnel. Financial and technical
needs for rehabilitating these orchards are being studied.
A resurgence of efforts to establish more seed orchards has followed implementation of the
National Forestation Programme. Nine seed orchards for 12 species were established in
1991 alone. For example, a 1.25ha seed orchard ofEucalyptus deglupta was established in
1991, with 500 grafted trees planted at a spacing of 5m x 5m.
Species and provenance trials have also been used for ex situ conservation purposes in the
Philippines. Some provenance and species trials have been conducted by DENR
for Pinus, Acacia, Eucalyptus, Casuarina, Gmelina and other multipurpose tree genera.
PICOP Resources Inc. (formerly the Paper Industries Corporation of the Philippines) and
Provident Tree Farms Inc. have conducted provenance trials of industrial plantation species
such as moluccan sau (Paraserianthes falcataria), Gmelina arborea and Endospermum
peltatum. The Ecosystems Research and Development Bureau (ERDB) has also recently
begun provenance trials for several Gmelina, Acacia and Eucalyptusspecies in Cavite
province. In Luzon and Mindanao, superior species have been identified and provenance
trials established through joint efforts by DENR and the New Zealand government, for
example the ASEAN-New Zealand Afforestation Project and Bukidnon Forest Industries.
The protocols for rooting of stem cuttings have been established in a number of species, for
example Dipterocarpaceae (Pollisco 1995; De la Cruz 1995; Oporto & Umali-Garcia
1998), P. falcataria (Budelman 1989), Eucalyptus hybrid (Siarot 1991), S. macrophylla, V.
parviflora (Umali-Garcia 1995), Pittosporum pentandrum (Umali-Garcia 1998), Pinus
merkusii(Umali-Garcia 1996) and A. dammara and T. philippinensis (Oporto 1999).
Successful tissue culture protocols have been developed for P. indicus (Calinawan & Halos
1984), Acacia mangium(Lapitan 1990), P. falcataria (Umali-Garcia 1990b), E.
peltatum (Quimado & Umali-Garcia 1997), Eucalyptus sp. (Halos 1985), Pinus
caribaea (Halos 1992) and Cratoxylon sumatranum (Quimado 1991). A variety of
commercially important indigenous and endemic species, as well as those reported to be
rare, threatened or endangered, require special attention for ex situ and in
situ conservation. A forest biotechnology programme at the College of Forestry and Natural
Resources of the University of the Philippines, Los Baños (UPLB) focuses on tissue culture
of selected industrial plantation species.
Nine botanical gardens exist in the Philippines with 16,000 taxa under cultivation (Fernando
1998). The first to be established was Makiling Botanic Gardens (MBG) in 1968. MBG
maintains both ex situ and in situ conservation stands of various timber species, for
example S. macrophylla, P. falcataria, V. parviflora and several species of dipterocarps. A
problem with these stands, however, is the lack of documentation on the origin of the
introduced species.
Seed banks, clone banks, plant museums and in vitro banks are other ex situ approaches,
but none has been used for timber species in the Philippines. The Institute of Plant
Breeding at UPLB maintains a genebank for agroforestry species such as Gliricidia sepium,
and a collection of fruit and endemic tree species. The Institute also has a genebank that
can store seeds and tissues for an indefinite period of time. It is currently storing specimens
of cereals and horticultural and ornamental species, but not timber species. Nevertheless,
the Institute is planning to start a programme of conservation of indigenous palms and
selected forest species. The ERDB has also established a genebank for rattan and bamboo
in Mt. Makiling Forest Reserve.
Government programmes of tree breeding and propagation are spearheaded by DENR with
support from the Forest Management Bureau and ERDB. DENR has prime responsibility for
promoting the well-being of the Filipino people through sustainable development of the
country's forest resources, optimal use of forest lands, social equity and effective forest
management. Various state universities and colleges also support DENR through research
and training (both academic and practical) of government personnel. In this regard, the
main contributor is UPLB, specifically its College of Forestry and Natural Resources,
Institute of Plant Breeding and Institute of Biotechnology Research. Other contributing state
universities include the Don Mariano Marcos State University, the Central Luzon State
University, the Central Mindanao University and the Visayas State College of Agriculture.
The Philippines has promulgated several laws and policies dealing with conservation,
protection and sustainable use of natural resources. Several laws directly or indirectly
related to protecting and conserving forest genetic resources are detailed below.
The Philippine constitution has the following provisions relating to the conservation of tree
species:
Support and protection by the State for the right of all Filipino people to a balanced
and healthy ecology in accordance with the rhythm and harmony of nature (Sec. 16,
Art. II); framework of national unity and development (Sec. 22, Art. II).
State ownership of all natural resources, except for agricultural lands (Sec. 2, Art.
XII).
Full control and supervision by the State of exploration, development and use of
natural resources either by directly undertaking such activities or by entering into co-
production, joint ventures or production-sharing agreements with Filipino citizens or
Filipino-owned or controlled corporations or associations (Sec. 2, Art. XII).
Small-scale utilization of natural resources (Sec. 2, Art. XIII).
Determination by Congress of the specific limits of forest lands by marking their
boundaries on the ground (Sec. 4, Art. XIII).
State protection of the rights of indigenous cultural communities to their ancestral
lands to ensure their economic, social and cultural well-being (Sec. 5, Art. XII).
The Philippines is committed to protecting and conserving its biological resources through
the Philippine Strategy for Sustainable Development (PSSD). This was endorsed by former
President Corazon Aquino and subsequently approved by the Cabinet in 1989 as a
response to the global call for well-balanced resource development. One of the ten major
strategies of the PSSD is biodiversity conservation. A sub-committee on biodiversity has
been created by the Philippine Council for Sustainable Development and is chaired by
DENR's Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau. In 1994, the sub-committee formulated the
Philippine Strategy for the Conservation of Biological Diversity (PSBD), which subsequently
provided a basis for a 1995 biodiversity study supported by UNEP. This study transformed
the PSBD into a National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan for the Philippines (NBSAP),
which was approved in June 1997. The signing of the Convention on Biological Diversity
(CBD) by the Philippines in 1992 increased appreciation and interest in biodiversity
conservation.
The following strategies and actions have been proposed to implement the above-
mentioned objectives:
Apart from the NIPAS Law (see above), eight other decrees, orders or proclamations curb
activities that may adversely impact biological diversity. Of these, the following relate to
conserving forest genetic resources:
Biotechnology is one of the banner programmes of the Philippines Science and Technology
Agenda for National Development (STAND 2000). This forms part of a national effort to
address problems in industry, environment, agriculture, food, health, and security. The
country has identified capacity building, infrastructure development, public education and
research and development activities as core areas of attention.
Some schools, colleges and universities in the Philippines offer courses in biodiversity
conservation or genetic conservation, but none offers courses specifically in genetic
conservation of tree species. Sixty-six schools offer traditional undergraduate degrees in
biology. These include basic courses in taxonomy, genetics, pharmacology, microbiology,
agronomy, entomology, crop sciences, plant breeding and other subjects.
The UPLB Graduate School currently offers master's and doctoral programmes in molecular
biology and biotechnology. It has also introduced a graduate course in plant genetic
resources conservation. UPLB's College of Forestry and Natural Resources also offers
courses in forest genetics and advanced tree improvement. The College has prepared a
course proposal for post-graduate degrees in forest resources management. Other courses
include environmental planning and environmental education for agriculture and forestry.
Several schools and colleges, such as the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of
the Philippines Diliman, the College of Biological Sciences at Visayas State College of
Agriculture, the Mindanao State University and Miriam College, also offer formal courses in
biodiversity.
The Regional Centre for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA) of
SEAMEO has organized several training workshops on biodiversity. The newly established
ASEAN Regional Centre for Biodiversity Conservation is mandated to promote, enhance
capacity and coordinate all initiatives in biodiversity conservation in ASEAN member states.
The Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement also conducts training in biodiversity
conservation.
UPLB's College of Forestry and Natural Resources, through its training arm TREES
(Training Centre for Tropical Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability), offers short-term
informal courses to forestry graduates and professionals on continuing professional
education through a training module on 'Recent Advances in Forest Technologies'. DENR
also offers training sessions to its staff and other individuals in biodiversity conservation,
environmental impact assessment, watershed management and community-based forest
management.
Political issues
Experience in the Philippines has shown how national priorities change with frequent
changes in political leadership. This affects reforestation as much as other environmental
programmes. Strong and continued political commitment at all levels is vital to the
successful establishment and management of forest plantation programmes.
Political solutions are also needed to streamline the management of forest genetic
resources. Although it is accepted that the government should control and regulate the
production, sale and movement of genetic materials within and into the country, appropriate
policies or laws have yet to be formulated. These should incorporate appropriate schemes
to regulate and certify the quality and price of planting stock (e.g. seeds, seedlings or
clones), and to monitor its movement or transfer.
Bio-ecological issues
Attempts to re-establish forests on abandoned agricultural lands or fire-ravaged areas have
encountered difficulties with poor seedling growth and survival, and outbreaks of pests and
diseases. Poor soil and microclimatic conditions have also created problems. Varying site
conditions and reforestation objectives (i.e. for production and protection) require the
development of appropriate reforestation approaches. For programmes with limited capital,
outcome-oriented approaches will be crucial to maximizing the value of available
technological, financial and physical resources.
Current seed sources are generally poor in quality and of insufficient quantity to support
large-scale plantation programmes. Past efforts to increase local seed supplies through trial
introductions of exotic species and provenances have been unable to meet demand. No
accurate estimates of the amount of seed being produced nationally exist, but production in
various species must reach 25-35 tons annually if the reforestation target of 100,000ha per
year is to be met. Part of this total is currently being collected from existing stands. Although
the selection of superior parent trees is continuing, the genetic quality of seeds cannot
currently be assured. Superior sources, i.e. seed and clonal orchards, must be established.
The Master Plan has established basic criteria for selecting priority species for planting.
These are: i) establishment success must be guaranteed; ii) an adequate amount of quality
seed must be available; iii) techniques for raising quality planting stock must be adequately
researched; and iv) the species has market potential.
Given these criteria, the choice of species will depend not only on growth characteristics,
but also on the condition of the planting site and the state of silvicultural technologies. The
ability to coppice and produce rooted cuttings will give a species an advantage from both
economic and tree-breeding perspectives. The Master Plan considers only those species
which will meet NFP requirements. The criteria limit the use of dipterocarps but only for the
period of forest establishment. After this dipterocarps may be planted. An emphasis has
also been put on the use of indigenous species and provenances to avoid the risks arising
from the use of exotic species.
It should be noted that, despite the preference given to indigenous species, many of these
species are exotics. Their inclusion on the list is justified for marketing reasons or by virtue
of their proven performance on particular sites. Additional species will be included after
periodic assessments of their appropriateness and an evaluation of the programme.
Pinus caribaea was given priority as a first rotation species in some areas because of its
claimed superiority over Pinus kesiya (an indigenous species) in growth rate, quality of
timber and pulp processing properties. This prioritization is subject to verification under local
conditions following the experiences of exotic pine introduction programmes during the
1980s.
Socio-economic issues
Burley, F. M. (1993) Tree Breeding Strategies. Man and the Biosphere Series No. 6.
UNESCO/Parthenon Publishing Group, Paris and Carnforth.
DENR (1990) Philippine Master Plan for Forestry - 1990. FMB, DENR, Quezon City.
DENR (1995) Department Administrative Order No. 95-09, Regulation of Forest Tree Seed
Production, Collection and Disposition. DENR, Quezon City.
Halos, J. (1985) The reference manual of woody plant propagation from seed to tissue
culture. Varsity Press, Athens, Georgia.
Appendix 1. Value and use of target, important species. These are priority tree species
commonly used in plantations because of their adaptability, and economic value. Source:
Agroforestry Seeds Circular (1992); ZBR Foundation (1992).
future value; 3 = Species of unknown value given present knowledge and technology.
products (gums, resins, oils, tannins, medicines, dyes, etc.); pu = pulp and paper; charcoal;
fo = food; fd = fodder; sh = shade, shelter; ag = agroforestry systems; co = soil and water
conservation; am = amenity, aesthetic, ethical values.
Appendix 2. List of threatened species in the Philippines. These need priority protection
based on the IUCN Red List and CITES because they have been identified as vulnerable,
endangered and/or critically endangered by forest exploitation. Source: Schouten (1992);
Wildlife Resources Division, DENR.
Senior Forest Management Specialist, Forest Seed and Tree Improvement Section, Reforestation
[6]
Division, Forest Management Bureau, Visayas Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines, Tel: +63-2-925
2134, Fax: +63-2-920 0374, E-mail: jakevm@edsamail.co.ph.