Difference Between Functional Manager & Project Manager
Difference Between Functional Manager & Project Manager
PROJECT MANAGER
FUNCTIONAL MANAGER
PROJECT MANAGER
1. A PM starts his career as a specialist in some field, later on being
promoted to some higher post.
2. He is required to be more skilled at synthesis.
3. The PM uses a system approach i.e. understanding the organizational
problem, for which the project is a part, the organization for which the
program exists, as well as the environment of the organization.
4. The PM is a facilitator and generalist.
5. He should be competent in the science of project along with having
the technical competence in some aspects.
6. He is responsible for organizing, planning, budgeting, directing,
planning, and controlling the project.
Economic Analysis:
Management Design
Design is the meaningful representation of something that is to be built. In
the project management concept design focuses on 4 major areas:
1. Data 2. Architecture 3. Interfaces 4. Components
Project Design is the first of the 3 technical activities that are required to
build and verify the software. 1. the data design transforms the information
created during analysis into the data structure that will be required to
implement the software. The data objects and relationship defines in the ER
diagram and the detail data contents depicted in the data dictionary provides
the basis in data design activity.2. the architecture design defines the
relationship between the structure elements and the design platforms that can
be used to achieve the requirements that have been designed for the system.
3. The interface design describes how the software communicates
with itself and the system and interface implies a flow of information and the
specific type of behavior. 4. the component level design transforms the
structural elements of the software architecture into a procedural description
of software component.
PROJECT TERMINATION
Project audit
Project audit is an examination of mgmt of a project. Its methodologies and
procedures, its records, its budgets and expenditure. It may deal with the
project as a whole or only the part of project. A formal report must be
presented which takes the following points into account. 1. Current status
of project: Which tells that the work actually completed does match with
the plant activity. 2. Future status: Are significant schedule changes
likely if so indicate the nature of changes. 3. Status of crucial task:
What progress has beeen made on task that to decide the success or failure
of the project.
4. Risk Assessment: Are the risk taken care of. 5. Information from other
project: What lessons are learned from the project autied earlier.
Depth of auditing : To what depth the auditing should be done is decided
by the organization. The factors which decide the depth of auditing are :
1.Cost 2. The clerical time used in conducting the audit 3. The
storage 4. The maintenance of the auditable data.
The general audit is normally carried out by the qualified technicians under
the direct guidance of project auditor.
Timing of audit :
1.The timing of audit will depend on the circumstances of a particular
project. The first audit are usually done early in projects life. The problem is
discovered the easier it is to deal with. Early audits often focussed on the
technical issues inorder to make sure that the key technical problems have
been solved. 2. The audit done later in the life cycle of project are of
less immediate value to the project but are of more value to the parent
organization. As the project develops technical issues are less likely to be
the matter of concern. 3. Post project audits are conducted with several
basic objectived in mind like legal necessity, feedback for manageral level,
to account for all project property and expenditure.
Responsibility of project auditor:
Following steps are carried out in a audit: 1. Essentially a small team of
experienced experts 2. Familiarized the team with the project.
3. Audit the project on site 4. After completion brief the project
management. 5. Produce a written report according to specified format.
6. Distribute the report to project manager and project team for their
response. 7. Follow up to see if recommendation have been
implemented.
Project Review
The project review is meant for evaluating actual performance with the
projected performance with the assurance and cost. When the actual
performance is measured and it is not as per the objectives then the reason
for such performance is evaluated.
Steps in review plan: the review team prepares a formal review plan around
the objectives of the review, the type of evaluation to be carried out and the
time schedule required.
1. Administrative Plan – the review group performs a) user objectives
b) operating cost and benefits
2. Personal Requirement Plan – evaluates all the activities which are
involved with the system personal and the staff that deal directly with the
system. The emphasis is one productivity, moral and job satisfaction.
3. Hardware Plan – the hardware of the project is also reviewed & the target
is comparison of current performance specification with design
specification.
4. Documentation Plan – to evaluate the accuracy and the completeness of
the documentation compiled to date and its conformity with the pre-
established documentation standards.
Contractual Arrangements