The document outlines 7 phases in the development of comparative education:
1) A prescientific phase of travelers' tales from ancient times. 2) A phase beginning in 1830 of systematic study of foreign education systems to borrow best practices, though not rigorously scientific. 3) A phase beginning in 1925 of international cooperation through organizations like UNESCO and increased rigorous scholarly study. 4) A "factors and forces" phase beginning in 1930 that studied education systems as outcomes of national contexts. 5) A social science phase beginning in 1960 that sought to establish comparative education as a full social science. 6) A phase of "paradigm wars" beginning in 1970 between equilibrium and conflict theories. 7) A heterogeneous phase beginning in 1990
The document outlines 7 phases in the development of comparative education:
1) A prescientific phase of travelers' tales from ancient times. 2) A phase beginning in 1830 of systematic study of foreign education systems to borrow best practices, though not rigorously scientific. 3) A phase beginning in 1925 of international cooperation through organizations like UNESCO and increased rigorous scholarly study. 4) A "factors and forces" phase beginning in 1930 that studied education systems as outcomes of national contexts. 5) A social science phase beginning in 1960 that sought to establish comparative education as a full social science. 6) A phase of "paradigm wars" beginning in 1970 between equilibrium and conflict theories. 7) A heterogeneous phase beginning in 1990
The document outlines 7 phases in the development of comparative education:
1) A prescientific phase of travelers' tales from ancient times. 2) A phase beginning in 1830 of systematic study of foreign education systems to borrow best practices, though not rigorously scientific. 3) A phase beginning in 1925 of international cooperation through organizations like UNESCO and increased rigorous scholarly study. 4) A "factors and forces" phase beginning in 1930 that studied education systems as outcomes of national contexts. 5) A social science phase beginning in 1960 that sought to establish comparative education as a full social science. 6) A phase of "paradigm wars" beginning in 1970 between equilibrium and conflict theories. 7) A heterogeneous phase beginning in 1990
The document outlines 7 phases in the development of comparative education:
1) A prescientific phase of travelers' tales from ancient times. 2) A phase beginning in 1830 of systematic study of foreign education systems to borrow best practices, though not rigorously scientific. 3) A phase beginning in 1925 of international cooperation through organizations like UNESCO and increased rigorous scholarly study. 4) A "factors and forces" phase beginning in 1930 that studied education systems as outcomes of national contexts. 5) A social science phase beginning in 1960 that sought to establish comparative education as a full social science. 6) A phase of "paradigm wars" beginning in 1970 between equilibrium and conflict theories. 7) A heterogeneous phase beginning in 1990
Phase 1: A phase of travellers’ tales; since times immemorial
As these travellers’ tales of the education practices of foreign societies and Cultures are mostly incidental, cursoric and not at all scientifically done, this phase could be regarded as a prescientific phase of Comparative Education.
Phase 2: A phase of the systematic study of foreign education systems
for Borrowing; since approximately 1830 By the beginning of the nineteenth century, mostly government officials began .To undertake comprehensive studies education systems and educational developments. In foreign countries, with the goal to borrow best ideas, methods, insights and Practices; i.e. to import them to improve their own education systems back home. These developments could be understood against the backdrop of the rise of national States in the countries of Western Europe and Northern America at this time, and the Establishment of national education systems of primary education in the states, as Part of the national project of state and nation formation. Though comprehensive, these studies of foreign education systems generally do not comply to the rigours of Scientific scholarship. Often, on the basis of pre-conceived ideas, beliefs and Prejudices, rather than on the basis of evidence, some systems and practices were Declared better than others. Comparative Education was still in a pre-scientific stage.
Phase 3: A phase of international cooperation, since 1925
It was at this time when Jullien appeared on the stage, pleading for a scholarly Endeavor of “Comparative Education” (he coined the term) serving the interest of humanity rather than narrow national ends. While he had no influence in the world 22 Jullien: Founding Father of Comparative and International Education Still Pointing the Way of his day, in the twentieth century got underway his ideals were realised in a variety of ways. These include International Organisations (such as UNESCO), International Institutes of Education Research (such as Institute of Education, University of London, or the Ontario Institute of Studies in Education, OISE, and University of Toronto), professional Comparative Education societies, conferences and journals, and studies international in scope (such as those of the International Association of Education Achievement, IEA).
Phase 4: A “factors and forces” phase, since about 1930
This was a phase when (national) education systems were studied as the outcome of (national) contextual forces, a phase which reached its zenith in the inter-war decades, a phase and paradigm chiming-in with the rise of nationalism and of nation-states in parts of Europe.
Phase 5: A social science phase, since approximately 1960
In this phase, which gathered momentum in post-war Europe and North America, attempts were made to turn Comparative Education in a full-blown social science. In these decades there was a wide-spread belief in the power of education as total panacea for all societal ills.
Phase 6: A phase of heterodoxy, since about 1970
This was the phase of paradigm wars, the main fault lines between the equilibrium paradigms (such as human capital theory, structural functionalism and modernization theory) and the conflict paradigms.
Phase 7: A phase of heterogeneity, since approximately 1990
This was a phase of a proliferation of the number and variety of paradigms making up the field. To summarize, while Jullien formulated a lofty vision for the field, and laid the basis for a science of Comparative Education (the two phases prior to his time were pre-scientific phases) his ideas and vision only came into fruition in the twentieth century. On top of that Comparative Education first went into a phase of remission (“factors and forces” stage) and went into a meandering course (fixation with paradigms) which distracted attention from the mission identified by Jullien.