Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 264 views

    Brown v. Florida Power Light - Order Adopting R&R

    Uploaded by

    Sarah Burstein
    The court order adopts the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant in part a motion for sanctions filed by Generac Power Systems against plaintiff's counsel. The order imposes sanctions under Rule 11 on plaintiff's attorneys Albert Bordas, Manotti Jenkins, and their law firms. Generac is entitled to reasonable fees and costs for bringing the sanctions motion. Generac must file a motion by March 30 with documentation of the requested fees and costs. Sanctions are not imposed on the plaintiff.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Brown v. Florida Power Light - Order Adopting R&R

    Uploaded by

    Sarah Burstein
    264 views2 pages
    The court order adopts the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant in part a motion for sanctions filed by Generac Power Systems against plaintiff's counsel. The order imposes sanctions under Rule 11 on plaintiff's attorneys Albert Bordas, Manotti Jenkins, and their law firms. Generac is entitled to reasonable fees and costs for bringing the sanctions motion. Generac must file a motion by March 30 with documentation of the requested fees and costs. Sanctions are not imposed on the plaintiff.

    Original Description:

    Brown v. Florida Power Light - Order adopting R&R

    Original Title

    Brown v. Florida Power Light - Order adopting R&R

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The court order adopts the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant in part a motion for sanctions filed by Generac Power Systems against plaintiff's counsel. The order imposes sanctions under Rule 11 on plaintiff's attorneys Albert Bordas, Manotti Jenkins, and their law firms. Generac is entitled to reasonable fees and costs for bringing the sanctions motion. Generac must file a motion by March 30 with documentation of the requested fees and costs. Sanctions are not imposed on the plaintiff.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    264 views2 pages

    Brown v. Florida Power Light - Order Adopting R&R

    Uploaded by

    Sarah Burstein
    The court order adopts the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant in part a motion for sanctions filed by Generac Power Systems against plaintiff's counsel. The order imposes sanctions under Rule 11 on plaintiff's attorneys Albert Bordas, Manotti Jenkins, and their law firms. Generac is entitled to reasonable fees and costs for bringing the sanctions motion. Generac must file a motion by March 30 with documentation of the requested fees and costs. Sanctions are not imposed on the plaintiff.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Case 1:20-cv-22434-JEM Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/17/2021 Page 1 of 2

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE


    SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
    MIAMI DIVISION
    Case Number: 20-22434-CIV-MARTINEZ-OTAZO-REYES

    AUDLEY BROWN,

    Plaintiff,

    vs.

    GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., et al.,

    Defendants.
    _____________________________________/

    ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


    THE MATTER was referred to the Honorable Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes, United States

    Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation on Defendant Generac Power Systems, Inc.’s

    Motion for Sanctions, [ECF Nos. 26, 28]. After conducting an evidentiary hearing on the matter,

    Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes filed a Report and Recommendation, [ECF No. 47], recommending

    that the motion be granted in part. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes recommended that

    Plaintiff’s counsel be sanctioned pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and Defendant

    Generac be awarded its reasonable fees and costs incurred in prosecuting the Motion for Sanctions.

    [ECF No. 26]. The Court has reviewed the entire record and notes that no objections have been

    filed. After careful consideration, it is hereby:

    ADJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes’s Report and

    Recommendation, [ECF No. 47], is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Accordingly, it is:

    ADJUDGED that

    1. Defendant Generac Power Systems, Inc.’s Motion for Sanctions, [ECF No. 26], is

    GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

    2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, sanctions are hereby imposed on
    Case 1:20-cv-22434-JEM Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/17/2021 Page 2 of 2

    Albert Bordas, Manotti L. Jenkins, Albert Bordas PA, and the Law Offices of

    Manotti L. Jenkins, Ltd., jointly and severally. Defendant Generac is entitled to its

    reasonable fees and costs incurred in prosecuting the instant Motion for Sanctions.

    3. Defendant Generac SHALL file a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs pursuant

    to this Order, including supporting documentation for the amount of fees and costs

    requested, on or before March 30, 2021.

    2. Rule 11 sanctions SHALL NOT be imposed on Plaintiff Audley Brown.

    DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 17th day of March, 2021.

    ____________________________________
    JOSE E. MARTINEZ
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
    Copies provided to:
    Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes
    All Counsel of Record

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy