Ejed 2015 04 s0548
Ejed 2015 04 s0548
Ejed 2015 04 s0548
548
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
SCHLICHTING ET AL
549
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
550
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
SCHLICHTING ET AL
a b
c d
Fig 1 Initial aspect of an endodontically treated tooth of a 35-year-old female patient (a to d).
551
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
of traumatized anterior teeth, the follow- launched that, thanks to the greater
ing aspects should be observed: The stiffness of its composite fuselage, can
mechanical properties of contemporary be pressurized at a higher level, which
dental composites are adequate due to simulates a maximum cabin altitude
significant improvements in filler tech- of 6,000 ft (as opposed to the 7,500
nology, which makes them eligible for to 8,000 ft of typical airplanes) and re-
both anterior and posterior use.14 How- sults in greater comfort for passengers.
ever, concerns still exist regarding wear Coming ‘back to earth’, a healthy tooth
and fracture (chipping of surfaces and can last for 100 years (even more), as
margins)15 when the materials are uti- is witnessed in many octogenarian and
lized under extreme conditions, for ex- nonagenarian patients seen in clinical
ample in high-stress situations, for large practice. The longevity of teeth is direct-
preparations, in the case of cuspal re- ly related to crown stiffness. Stiffness, in
placement or for the restoration of the turn, is based on the physical proper-
full quadrant.16 In a 3-year follow-up ties of the tissues (enamel and dentin),
clinical study,17 composite veneers pre- loading configuration, and geometry.19
sented surface quality changes (slightly The enamel shell determines the stress
rough) 6 times more frequently than was distribution over the crown.8 During
observed for porcelain ones. This phe- functional protrusive movements, in the
nomenon could simply be unnoticed by maxillary incisors for example, the facial
patients – and even by dentists – in the enamel blade will be mostly subjected
posterior region, but not in the anterior to compressive stresses, while tensile
region, where mirror symmetry between stresses will concentrate in the palatal
central incisors is unconsciously expect- fossa.20 This mechanism can provide
ed. In another 3-year clinical study,18 reciprocal protection during millions of
where 170 anterior restorations were masticatory cycles, yet any threat to
placed by undergraduate dental stu- this balance can shorten the lifespan
dents, class IV restorations showed the of this sophisticated structure. Several
highest prevalence of failure (deficient studies19-22 have demonstrated the im-
marginal adaptation and loss of restor- pact of restorative procedures on crown
ation). This is consistent with another rigidity. When enamel is replaced by a
important property, the fracture tough- more flexible material like a microhybrid
ness, which even in current composites composite (elastic modulus ≈ 16 GPa),
is bellow 2.0 MPa m½ (3 times less than only 76% to 88% of its original rigidity is
reinforced ceramics).14 recovered after the placement of com-
Finally, our presented approach is dis- posite restorations21 and composite ve-
tinguished from those discussed above neers,22 respectively. On the other hand,
in that it relies on the recovery of the a study showed that 97% of the crown
original stiffness of the crown: traditional stiffness is recovered when feldspathic
porcelain veneers. Stiffness plays a key porcelain (elastic modulus ≈ 70 GPa)
role in the performance of any complex is used as an enamel substitute.20 It is
structure, mainly for those subjected to worth noting that there is no evidence to
cyclic loads. Recently, an airplane was show that extra intrinsic strength such
552
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
SCHLICHTING ET AL
as that of reinforced ceramics would be her central incisors to ensure good color
needed. As for the natural tooth, which is matching. The tooth had first been trau-
made of extremely brittle enamel, it is the matized in 1985 when, at the age of 9, the
synergistic combination of the materials patient fell and fractured the distoincisal
(ceramic shell and luting agent), as well third of the tooth. She was treated with
as the bonding quality, that defines the a direct class IV composite restoration
performance of the restored tooth. Sev- on surfaces MIDBL. In 1989, she devel-
eral treatment modalities may usually be oped an acute periapical abscess. At
associated with endodontically treated this point, root canal therapy was carried
teeth (eg, class III composite restorations out. The patient was not satisfied with
due to previous caries, or class IV com- the esthetic result, and in 1997 internal
posite restorations related to previous bleaching was performed, along with a
trauma). It has been demonstrated that new class IV composite restoration. Four
successive restorative procedures per- years later, the tooth was again internally
formed on the same tooth significantly bleached with hydrogen peroxide 35%
influences crown flexure.19 Only 88% of gel, and a fiber post was placed, fol-
the original crown stiffness is recovered lowed by external bleaching in 2003,
when class III cavities and endodon- which was done with a laser. When the
tic access are restored with composite patient presented in 2010, she insisted
resin (as the endodontic access is lo- that, regardless of the advantages of tis-
cated in a critical area, its contribution sue conservation,24 she did not want to
to crown rigidity is higher). If this tooth try bleaching again since she was wor-
had been endodontically treated at an ried about the risk of root resorption;
earlier stage (childhood/adolescence; instead, she would choose either a di-
Fig 1b), this percentage would be even rect or indirect restorative solution. The
lower. Therefore, any additional replace- patient was esthetically minded, having
ment of sound enamel by composite is even undergone surgery in 2009 to de-
not recommended in these cases. With crease her gummy smile.
survival rates of 96%23 after 10 years, The case illustrates a biomimetic ap-
porcelain veneers are the only restora- proach with ceramics, where a porce-
tive treatment with no additional effect lain veneer preparation completed for
on crown compliance. a combined indication (types IB and
IIIA)25 allowed for the solving of the
problem of the remaining staining of a
Case presentation pulpless tooth and the restoration of an
extensive coronal fracture. The palatal
A 35-year-old female dentist present- endodontic access was treated before
ed as a new patient to a private dental the veneer preparation, to both improve
practice in Florianópolis, Brazil, in 2010 the biomechanics through a more ana-
requesting a full-coverage crown restor- tomical cingulum/palatal fossa and en-
ation on her maxillary right central incisor sure proper bonding through a proven
(Fig 1). The patient was willing to receive protocol (fourth generation bonding
full-coverage crown restorations on both system). The large palatal endodontic
553
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
a b c
d e f
g h i
Fig 2 The existing class IV composite is completely removed from the distofacial–incisal angle with a
tapered diamond bur, unveiling the type IIIA indication (extensive coronal fracture) (a). After the placement
of a deflection cord (eg, Ultrapak #000, Ultradent), facial depth grooves are prepared (recommended bur:
6850.016, Brasseler) (b and c), followed by gross reduction (6850.023, Brasseler) (d and e). In the ab-
sence of oscillating instruments, a thin bur should be used to create the proximal margins (eg, 6850.014,
Brasseler) (f). Control with the facial silicon index (a uniform space is generated) (g). The large proximal
contact demands stripping to prevent deep interdental penetration (h). Regardless of the dark shade, a
paragingival margin is chosen (i).
access was removed until natural tissue ite (Miris, Coltène Whaledent). The final
was reached, leaving only the existing layer was completed with the aid of a
fiber post untouched. In order to sim- transparent index, based on a previous
plify the procedures, the post was not re- wax-up (Transil, Ivoclar Vivadent).
moved, since the mechanical principles The axial reduction for veneers should
on which veneer preparation are based be agreed upon by both the clinician
are not dependent on intraradicular re- and the laboratory technician (Fig 2).
tention.26 The pulp chamber was sealed The depth of the preparation will be de-
with the total-etch bonding technique termined by the thickness of the bond-
(OptiBond FL, Kerr), followed by incre- ing layer, the masking agent, and the
mentally placed microhybrid compos- porcelain itself. Although non-discolor-
554
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
SCHLICHTING ET AL
a b c
d e
f g
Fig 3 When using a 3-step etch-and-rinse system, the procedure starts by etching the freshly cut dentin
with a 35% phosphoric acid (eg, Ultra-etch, Ultradent) (a), followed by rinsing, and the evacuation of ex-
cess water by microsuction (eg, Black Mini Tip, Ultradent) (b and c). A hydrophilic monomer (Optibond
FL, Bottle no. 1, Kerr) is applied with a gentle brushing motion and the excess solvent is suctioned (d).
A thin coat of filled adhesive resin is then applied (Optibond FL, Bottle no. 2, Kerr) (e). In cases where
the adhesive surpasses the dentin/enamel margins, an applicator tip can be used to remove most of the
excess with pinpoint accuracy by microsuction. No air blowing should be needed, and direct contact with
the dentin should be avoided (f). The adhesive is then light-polymerized for 20 s, with an additional 10 s
under an air-blocking barrier (eg, K-Y Jelly, Johnson & Johnson) to reduce the oxygen-inhibition layer (g).
555
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
a b
Fig 4 Cannulae tips (from left to right: Black Mini Tip, Blue Micro Tip, Black Micro Tip; Ultradent) (a).
A cannulae tip connected to a saliva ejector valve (b).
556
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
SCHLICHTING ET AL
a b c
d e f
Fig 6 Pumice is used to remove the residual unpolymerized layer of adhesive to obtain defect-free im-
pressions (a). New deflection cords are positioned in the gingival sulcus, allowing the margin to be visible
(b). A double-mix/one-step impression is used to capture the margin without tears or defects (c). In the
follow-up visit (2-3 weeks later, to allow for rehydration) the shade guides are viewed in the same plane in
order to aid the stump shade match for the final restoration (d and e). A strict photographic protocol, in-
cluding polarized pictures (eg, Polar_eyes) (f) is always recommended. It was particularly necessary in this
challenging case, where the technician and the patient did not meet because they live in different countries.
557
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
a b
c d e
f g
Fig 7 Porcelain veneer (Creation CC, Klema) on an optical verification die (alveolar delta die).31,32 Only
one veneer was fabricated, and after the first try-in, a minor correction was performed in the incisal halo re-
gion using low-fusion porcelain (a). Field isolation with rubber dam allows full access to the margins, which
is the standard for luting procedures of porcelain veneers (clamp 212) (b). Tooth preparation is treated with
airborne-particle abrasion and etched for 30 s with 37.5% phosphoric acid (Gel etchant, Kerr) (c and d),
rinsed, and dried. Fitting surfaces, restoration, and tooth were coated with adhesive resin (Optibond FL,
Bottle no. 2, Kerr) and left unpolymerized until the application of the luting material (Variolink Veneer High
Value +1, Ivoclar Vivadent) to the restoration, which was then digitally seated. Before light polymerization,
the gross excess luting material is removed with an explorer (e). Microbrushes should be avoided because
their fine bristles could extract the luting agent from the margin joint.2 Still under rubber dam, excess adhe-
sive and luting material are best removed with hand instruments (no. 12 surgical blade) (f and g).
558
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
SCHLICHTING ET AL
559
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
a b
Fig 9 Smile (a). Under natural light, close to sunset (b). The patient was satisfied with the integration of
the restoration (c).
560
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
SCHLICHTING ET AL
References
1. Magne P, Hanna J, Magne 5. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. 10. Dietschi D. Nonvital bleach-
M. The case for moderate Tooth structure removal ing: general considerations
“guided prep” indirect porce- associated with various and report of two failure
lain veneers in the anterior preparation designs for cases. Eur J Esthet Dent
dentition. The pendulum of anterior teeth. J Prosthet 2006;1:52–61.
porcelain veneer prepar- Dent 2002;87:503–509. 11. Friedman S, Rotstein I,
ations: from almost no-prep 6. Callister Jr WD. Compos- Libfeld H, Stabholz A, Heling
to over-prep to no-prep. Eur ites. In: Callister Jr WD I. Incidence of external root
J Esthet Dent 2013;8:376– (ed). Materials science and resorption and esthetic
388. engineering: an introduction, results in 58 bleached
2. Magne P, Belser U (eds). ed 4. New York: John Wiley & pulpless teeth. Endod Dent
Bonded Porcelain Restor- Sons, 1997:510–548. Traumatol 1988;4:23–26.
ations in the Anterior Denti- 7. Reinhart TJ. Overview of com- 12. Holmstrup G, Palm AM,
tion: A Biomimetic Approach. posite materials. In: Peters ST Lambjerg-Hansen H. Bleach-
Chicago: Quintessence (ed). Handbook of compos- ing of discoloured root-filled
Publishing, 2002. ites, ed 2. London: Chapman teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol
3. Schlichting LH, Schlicht- & Hall, 1998:21–33. 1988;4:197–201.
ing KK, Stanley K, Magne 8. Magne P, Douglas WH. 13. Glockner K, Hulla H, Ebel-
M, Magne P. An approach Rationalization of esthetic eseder K, Städtler P. Five-
to biomimetics: the natural restorative dentistry based year follow-up of internal
CAD/CAM restoration: a clin- on biomimetics. J Esthet bleaching. Braz Dent J
ical report. J Prosthet Dent Dent 1999;11:5–15. 1999;10:105–110.
2014;111:107–115. 9. Dietschi D, Dietschi JM. Cur- 14. Ferracane JL. Resin com-
4. Haywood V. In-office bleach- rent developments in com- posite – state of the art. Dent
ing: lights, applications and posite materials and tech- Mater 2011;27:29–38.
outcomes. Current Practice niques. Pract Periodontics 15. Tyas MJ. Correlation
2009;16:3–6. Aesthet Dent 1996;8:603–613. between fracture properties
561
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3
CLINICAL RESEARCH
and clinical performance of 21. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, 28. Dietschi D, Monasevic M,
composite resins in Class Messer HH. Stiffness of Krejci I, Davidson C. Mar-
IV cavities. Aust Dent J endodontically-treated ginal and internal adaptation
1990;35:46–49. teeth related to restoration of class II restorations after
16. Krämer N, Reinelt C, Richter technique. J Dent Res immediate or delayed com-
G, Petschelt A, Franken- 1989;68:1540–1544. posite placement. J Dent
berger R. Nanohybrid vs. 22. Reeh ES, Ross GK. Tooth 2002;30:259–269.
fine hybrid composite in stiffness with composite 29. Magne P, So WS, Cascione
Class II cavities: clinical veneers: a strain gauge and D. Immediate dentin sealing
results and margin analysis finite element evaluation. supports delayed restoration
after four years. Dent Mater Dent Mater 1994;10:247– placement. J Prosthet Dent
2009;25:750–759. 252. 2007;98:166–174.
17. Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan 23. Peumans M, De Munck J, 30. Magne P. Immediate dentin
M. Randomized clinical trial Fieuws S, Lambrechts P, sealing: a fundamental pro-
of indirect resin composite Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek cedure for indirect bonded
and ceramic veneers: up to B. A prospective ten–year restorations. J Esthet Restor
3-year follow-up. J Adhes clinical trial of porcelain Dent 2005;17:144–154.
Dent 2013;15:181–190. veneers. J Adhes Dent 31. Magne M, Bazos P, Magne
18. Moura FR, Romano AR, Lund 2004;6:65–76. P. The alveolar model.
RG, Piva E, Rodrigues Júnior 24. Meyenberg KH. Nonvital Quintessence Dent Technol
SA, Demarco FF. Three- teeth and porcelain lami- 2009;32:39–46.
year clinical performance nate veneers – a contra- 32. Magne M, Magne I, Bazos
of composite restorations diction? Eur J Esthet Dent P, Paranhos MP. The paral-
placed by undergraduate 2006;1:192–206. lel stratification masking
dental students. Braz Dent J 25. Magne P, Magne M, Belser technique: an analytical
2011;22:111–116. U, Natural and restorative approach to predictably
19. Magne P, Douglas WH. oral esthetics. Part II: Esthet- mask discolored dental
Cumulative effects of suc- ic treatment modalities. J substrate. Eur J Esthet Dent
cessive restorative proced- Esthet Dent 1993;5:239–246. 2010;5:330–339.
ures on anterior crown flex- 26. Meyenberg KH. The ideal 33. Magne P, Paranhos MP,
ure: intact versus veneered restoration of endodontically Hehn J, Oderich E, Boff LL.
incisors. Quintessence Int treated teeth – structural and Selective masking for thin
2000;31:5–18. esthetic considerations: a indirect restorations: can the
20. Magne P, Douglas WH. review of the literature and use of opaque resin affect
Porcelain veneers: dentin clinical guidelines for the the dentine bond strength of
bonding optimization and restorative clinician. Eur J immediately sealed prepar-
biomimetic recovery of the Esthet Dent 2013;8:238–268. ations? J Dent 2011;39:707–
crown. Int J Prosthodont 27. Gurel G, Sesma N, Calamita 709.
1999;12:111–121. MA, Coachman C, Morimoto
S. Influence of enamel pres-
ervation on failure rates of
porcelain laminate veneers.
Int J Periodontics Restorative
Dent 2013;33:31–39.
562
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t8*/5&3