Detailed Analysis of Arrest of Person and Arrest Without Warrant
Detailed Analysis of Arrest of Person and Arrest Without Warrant
Detailed Analysis of Arrest of Person and Arrest Without Warrant
Introduction
For decades across the globe, there has been a debate regarding the validity of
preventive arrest by law enforcement. The preventive arrest is simply done to
stop a person from committing a cognizable offence in future. Historically, the
preventive arrest was infamously be used in India during British rule under the
Bengal State Prisoners Regulation, 1818 which empowered the government to
detain or arrest anybody on mere suspicion.
The main object of criminal law is to protect society from criminals and
lawbreakers. The criminal law consists of both procedural law and substantive
law. In India, substantive law is the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and procedural
law is the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The procedural aspects of arrest are laid down in the Code of Criminal
Procedure; under this, the complete process is mentioned related to the arrest
of a person who has committed any offence. Chapter V of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 deals with the arrest of a person under section 41
to section 60.
Thus after an arrest, a person’s liberty is under full control of arrester. But
every deprivation of liberty or physical restraint should not be interpreted as the
arrest. Only the deprivation of liberty by a legal authority in a professionally
competent and skilful manner amounts to arrest.
The major purpose of arrest is to bring the person before a court and secure
administration of law. An arrest also serves the purpose of notifying the society
that a particular individual has committed an act which is against the society
and act as a remark to deter crime in the future.
However, even if a person against whom no accusation has been made can also
be arrested for certain purposes like removal in safe custody from one place to
another. For example, removing a minor girl from a brothel. Arrest should not
be confused with custody because both have different meanings. Judicial
custody of a person is followed after the arrest of a person by a magistrate on
appearance. In every arrest, there is custody but not vice versa.
Section 154 provides further that, “if any person aggrieved by a refusal on the
part of the officer in charge of police station, may send the substance of such
information by post to Superintendent of Police, who is satisfied that such
information discloses any commission of cognizable offences, shall either
investigate himself or direct an investigation to be made any police officer
subordinate to him”.
“(1) When any person who, in the presence of police officer has committed or
has been accused of committing a non-recognizable offence refuses on demand
of such officer, to give his name and residence or gives a name or residence
which such officer has reason to believe to be false, he may be arrested by such
officer in order that his name or residence may be ascertained”.
The police officers are empowered by virtue of section 151 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure to arrest a person to prevent the commission of cognizable
offences. Provisions under section 151 are:
“(1) A police officer knowing of design of any cognizable offence may arrest the
person so designing it, without any orders from a magistrate and without a
warrant, if it appears to such officer that the commission of offence cannot be
prevented otherwise.
Process of Arrest
The police officers have to follow a set of rules while arresting any person. The
mode of arrest is mentioned under section 46 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure whether it is done with the warrant or without the warrant. In
arresting a person, the person so arrested should not be handcuffed unless the
police have obtained orders from a magistrate in this regard. Provisions of
section 46 are:
(1) In making an arrest the police officer or any other person making the same
shall actually touch or confine the body of a person to be arrested unless there
is a submission to the word by custody.
(3) Nothing in this section gives a right to cause the death of a person who is
not accused of an offence punishable with death or with life imprisonment.
Conclusion
Up to now, we have discussed the power of arrest and the rights of an arrested
person. But by going through the data’s of Law Commission on Law of arrest we
will realise that due to the unawareness of people about their rights how this
power to secure the peace in the society is being misused. The arrest of a
person has a demoralising and diminishing effect on his personality. The person
so arrested becomes outrageous, alienated and hostile. So there should be a
balance between the security of a state and individual freedom.
Reference
1. (1997) 1 SCC 416