Critical Journal Review English Economy: Supporting Lecturer: Dr. Mica Siar Meiriza, SS, M.Si
Critical Journal Review English Economy: Supporting Lecturer: Dr. Mica Siar Meiriza, SS, M.Si
Critical Journal Review English Economy: Supporting Lecturer: Dr. Mica Siar Meiriza, SS, M.Si
ENGLISH ECONOMY
Supporting lecturer :
Dr. Mica Siar Meiriza, SS, M.Si
ARRANGED BY:
PUTRI AULINA
(7191240004)
1
FOREWORD
Thank God we pray to God Almighty for His blessings and gifts, the writing of this
paper can be resolved. The Critical Journal of this review
that is about "ACCOUNTING"
I compiled the Critical Journal Review (CJR) as a task for the Core Physics course
and made the addition of insight and understanding of the material. I hope, hopefully after the
completion of the writing of the Crtical Journal Review, I will understand more about how
the writing of the Crtical Journal Review is good and correct.
I realize that in the preparation of the CJR it is still very far from perfection,
therefore I really hope for criticism and suggestions and guidance from the lecturers for the
sake of improvement in the future, I hope this CJR paper will benefit all.
Composers
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD...........................................................................................................1
TABLE OF CONTENTS......................................................................................2
CHAPTER I : PRELIMINARY...........................................................................3
A. Rationalization of the Importance of Critical Journal Review (CJR).........3
B. The Purpose of Writing a Critical Journal Review (CJR)..........................3
C. Benefits of Critical Journal Review (CJR).................................................3
D. Journal Identity reviewed...........................................................................4
CHAPTER IV : CONCLUSION.........................................................................10
A. Conclusion.................................................................................................10
B. Recommendation.......................................................................................10
REFERENCES...................................................................................................11
3
CHAPTER I
PRELIMINARY
Critical Journal Review (CJR) is very important for education circles, especially for
students and college students because by criticizing a journal then students or critics can
compare two journals with the same theme, can see which journals need to be improved and
which journals are good to be used based on the research that has been done by the author of
the journal, after being able to criticize the journal, it is expected that students can make a
journal because they already know the criteria for good and correct journals to use and
already understand how to write or any steps needed in writing the journal.
Critical journal This review was made aiming to learn through the fulfillment of the
assignments of Education Professional Courses in the Department of Physics of the State
University of Medan to make a Critical Journal Review (CJR) so that it can add knowledge to
see or compare two or several good and correct journals. After being able to compare it will
be able to make a journal because it can already compare which journals are good and which
journals still need to be repaired and also because they have understood the steps of making a
journal.
JOURNAL I
Article Title : A Mixed-Method Study of the Effect of the Demonstration
Method on Students’ Achievement in Financial Accounting
ISSN : 1694-609X
4
JOURNAL II
Article Title : Student engagement activities to enhance professional
advancement in accounting and business careers
Issue published : -
Vol : 20
ISSN :-
5
CHAPTER II
SUMMARY OF THE CONTENT
6
encouraged to ask questions at each step of the lesson, and at the end of the lesson the
students were asked to practice some exercises similar to what the teacher has done during
the lesson.
On the other hand, in conventional approach class, students put all their focus on the
teacher. Therefore, it is suggested that the secondary school’s teachers of financial accounting
should be encourage by government to adopt the demonstration method as an approach for
teaching secondary schools students the subject financial accounting to enhance their
students’ achievement in the subject.
However, only level two secondary students of financial accounting are considered
in the present study. Hence, the generalization of the result of this study is limited to only
level two financial accounting students of secondary school. This study recommended that a
similar study should be conducted in future to consider other levels of financial accounting in
secondary schools. Also, future studies should consider the knowledge retention of students
in financial accounting when taught using demonstration instructional approach.
JOURNAL II
7
(AICPA) with a practitioner focus. The Commision’s purpose was to “study the future
structure of higher education for the accounting profession and develop recommendations for
educational pathways to engage and retain the strongest possible community of students,
academics, practitioners, and other knowledgeable leaders in the practice and study of
accounting” (Behn,.Ezzell, Murphy, Rayburn, Stith, & Strawser, 2012, p. 595). Participants
included leaders from both accounting practice and accounting education with the
Commission seeking input from multiple stakeholders over eighteen months to
determine which factors enhance the opportunities and relevance of the accounting
educational experience. The final report, The Pathways Commission on Accounting Higher
Education: Charting a National Strategy for the Next Generation of Accountants, contained
seven recommendations, all with strong implications for student learning and long-run
success. The number one recommendation was “Build a learned profession for the future by
purposeful integration of accounting research, education, and practice for students,
accounting practitioners, and educators” (Behn, et al., p. 597).
BEST PRACTICES
8
CHAPTER III
DISCUSSION
JOURNAL I
- Weaknesses Journal
a. The discussion is not interisting.
b. Writing is not neat.
- Strenghts
a. Good research results.
b. Selectin of good titles.
c. Easy to understand and understand.
JOURNAL II
- Weaknesses Journal
a. No published city is included and ISSN.
- Strenghts
a. The cover is very attractive.
b. Neat writing.
c. Easy to understand.
9
CHAPTER IV
CONCLUSION
A. Conclusion
From the discussion of weaknesses and advantages that have been explained or explained
above, each journal, namely the main journal, journal 1, journal 2 has its own weaknesses and
strengths both in terms of writing, grammar and also the depth of the material. Then it can be
concluded that the two journals are good and can be used as a reference for readers, but still
need improvement. It can be concluded that the journal is appropriate or good for the reader
to use as a reference for other studies.
B. Recommendation
For the future or further weaknesses or shortcomings of each journal, it needs to be improved
so that it is better used or used by readers as references in research or for other uses.
10
REFERENCES
Behn B. K. (Chair), Ezzell, W F., Murphy, L. A., Rayburn, J. D., Stith, M.T. &
Strawser, J. R. (2012).The Pathways Commission on Accounting Higher Education: Charting
a National Strategy for the Next Generation of Accountants. Issues in Accounting Education,
27 (3), 595-600.
Bloom, R. (2013, August). Perspectives on the Pathways Commission Report.The
CPA Journal, 83(8), 10-14.
Bullen, M. L., Capener, E.D. & Kordecki, G.S. (2015). The accounting internship:
Toward meaningful experiences for students, employers, and educational institutions. Journal
of Theoretical Accounting Research, 11(1), 1-13.
Abimbola, I. O., & Abidoye, F. O. (2013). Effect of qualification and experience of
biology teachers on the status of ecology teaching in Kwara State. Journal of Education and
Practice, 4(24), 1-8.
Adekoya, Y. M., & Olatoye, R. A. (2011). Effect of demonstration, peer-tutoring,
and lecture teaching strategies on senior secondary school students’ achievement in an aspect
of agricultural science. The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 12(1), 320-332.
11