LE201 11 Darwin
LE201 11 Darwin
LE201 11 Darwin
1 / 30
Various Theories of Evolution
3 / 30
Local Circumstances, Local Advantages
A key result of evolution by natural selection is that it forces us
to look at various binaries such as advantage and disadvantage,
superior and inferior from a local perspective.
This means that there cannot be traits that are better in any
absolute sense – there can only be traits that are better suited
for a particular set of circumstances.
§ In an anoxic environment, being able to consume sulfates
is more useful than, say, general intelligence.
Within a species, individuals specialize at exploiting the
environment in various ways, and over long periods this
specialization creates divergence.
§ A group of birds with longer beaks might prefer worms,
while a group with stronger beaks might prefer nuts.
§ Being attractive to, and interacting with, mates of the
opposite sex is an exploitation of local circumstances.
4 / 30
The Place of Homo sapiens
One of the most controversial aspects of the theory of evolution
is the implications that it has for human beings.
According to current thinking, there were a number of other
species (or varieties) of the homo genus that were closely related
to humans, but which are now all extinct (Homo habilis, H.
erectus, H. ergaster, H. heidelbergensis, H. neanderthalensis, H.
floresiensis, etc.). H. habilis lived some 2.3 million years ago,
whereas the Neanderthals died out about 24,000 years ago. The
whole genus is thought to be about 2.5 million years old and to
have diverged from the pan genus of great apes about 5 million
years ago.
Key Point
Humans did not evolve from apes of the pan genus. Both pan
apes and humans evolved from now extinct common ancestors.
Moreover, we are still part of the ape family (Hominidae).
5 / 30
The Ape Superfamily
6 / 30
Evolutionary Theories in the 19th Century
In the 19th century, there were many conflicting ideas about
evolution and the meaning of the existence of variations among
organisms. Many natural philosophers, believed that God had
created a fixed number of species and that since that time there
had been hybridization and mixing (variation), but no
fundamental change.
In the 1790s, Darwin’s own grandfather, Erasmus, had
published poems putting forward the idea of evolution.
In the 1810s, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck outlined a comprehensive
theory of evolution in which animals, individually, become more
complex and better adapted and then pass these changes onto
their offspring. This kind of theory is known as Lamarkism.
In 1844, Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation (Robert
Chambers) presented a natural history in which all forms were
in transformation and everything develops from previous
forms.
7 / 30
19th Century Geology: Neptunism
In the 18th and 19th centuries the empirical study of rocks and
minerals was of increasing economic importance. The earliest
theories of rock formations were developed in the mining
schools in the German states.
Abraham Werner (1749–1817), a professor at the mining school
in Freiburg, set out a theory of stratification, in which he
claimed that different types of rocks were laid down in different
periods of the earth’s history by the gradual drying of a
primordial ocean.
In the early 19th century, this was combined with a hypothesis
of cataclysmic changes and developed as a theory that helped
geologists prospect for different types of rocks and minerals.
There were also conservative thinkers, who linked the
primordial ocean of neptunism with Noah’s flood mentioned in
the Bible, but this was not the majority.
8 / 30
19th Century Geology: Plutonism
In the 19th century, it became clear that the same kinds of rocks
had been formed in different periods of the earth’s history, so
geologists began to study the fossils embedded in the strata. It
became clear that there were the same kinds of fossils at
comparable levels all over the earth.
Geologist like James Hutton (1726–1797) and Charles Lyell
(1797–1875) began to focus on the role of volcanoes and argued
that the earth had a molten core – which was called plutonism.
They argued that geological formations are not the result of
cataclysmic changes in the past, but the long-term gradual
result of processes we see around us now. This became known
as uniformitarianism.
Hutton:
“We find no vestige of a beginning,—no prospect of an end.”
15 / 30
Becoming Respectable
After returning from the voyage of the Beagle, Darwin began to
publish his ideas about the geography of South America,
handbooks of the flora and fauna of the places he visited and
an account of his travels.
He made a name for himself as a natualist and became a friend
and colleague of many of the most important biologists in
England.
Occasionally, he would try to interest someone in his ideas
about transmutation, but no one was convinced.
Because Darwin was himself a member of the social elite, he
tried to distance himself from other evolutionists, such as
Lamarck and Chambers. Also, his wife was very religious.
§ At this time, in Britain, evolution was regarded as a
dangerous idea, associated with France, the revolution,
and social and political unrest.
16 / 30
The Origin of Species, 1859–1872
When Darwin realized that the established scientists were not
interested in his ideas, he began to cultivate the friendship of
younger men who were on the rise such as Thomas Huxley
(1825–1895) and Joseph Hooker (1817–1911). Over a period of
many years, through correspondence, he tried to convince them
of his ideas.
In the 1850s, he also started a correspondence with Alfred
Wallace (1823–1913). This lead to Wallace sending Darwin a
short paper in which he independently described a theory of
evolution by natural selection.
It was decided by Lyell and Hooker, who both knew of
Darwin’s work, that the two men should make a joint
presentation at the Linnean Society acknowledging their
independent discovery. No one took any notice of this.
Darwin then spent over a year developing the argument which
was published as On the Origin of Species, 1859.
17 / 30
The Origin of Species: Variation (Chaps. 1 & 2)
18 / 30
The Origin of Species: Struggle for Existence (Chap. 3)
19 / 30
The Struggle for Existence
20 / 30
The Origin of Species: Natural Selection (Chap. 4)
21 / 30
Natural Selection
22 / 30
Darwin’s concept of divergence
The Origin was a very popular book, and went through six
editions from 1859 to 1872. Darwin tapped into the thinking of
the time and pitched evolution as a form of progress similar to
the progress of the English nation that his contemporaries
perceived. England was no longer as conservative as it had
been when he was young and a belief in social progress using
science and industry fit well with the evolutionary idea of
biological progress.
Literal interpretations of the Bible were coming under
increasing criticism and many were prepared to be convinced
of the fact of biological evolution.
Darwin’s close supporters, such as Huxley, Hooker and Lyell,
were influential and helped Darwin carry out the social aspect
of the argument for evolution.
24 / 30
The Reaction to Natural Selection
Although the Origin convinced many naturalists of the fact of
evolution, many people remained skeptical about the theory of
natural selection. People raised the following objections:
§ It is random and open-ended.
§ Is not a goal directed process.
§ Where the goal was implicitly understood as white,
Victorian, upper-class males.
§ It does not imply directed progress.
§ This was a challenge to the establishment and to the
mercantile values of the rising middle class.
§ Is not an open system, as in Lamarck’s theory. That is,
individuals cannot improve themselves throughout the
course of their lives and pass on these improvements.
Most naturalists of the 1870s and 80s became evolutionists, and
even called themselves “Darwinists,” but did not accept natural
selection, which was the core of Darwin’s theory.
25 / 30
Darwinists without Natural Selection
Dobzhanzky, 1973:
“Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of
evolution.”
There was a renewed interest in the evolution of the human
race and in thinking about the implications of evolution
through natural selection as a basis for understanding our
social and moral place in the world.
28 / 30
Natural Selection and Human Nature
Some of the most serious implications of the theory of natural
selection are on our understanding of human nature.
If human beings evolved from a primate ancestor, it might mean
that even our most “noble” traits – such as our ability to love,
our feeling of the divine, our creativity, our love of knowledge,
our concern for others, etc. – are not the gifts of a beneficent
god, but are rather the chance results of natural processes.
While it is easy to see that our base traits – such as greed, lust,
selfishness, etc. – would have helped our ancestors to survive, it
has been more difficult to see this with our noble traits.
We are still in the process of developing models of behavior
that show how these traits would have been advantageous to
our ancestors. That is, scientists are currently still articulating
the paradigm of natural selection to cover more and more
phenomena.
29 / 30
Overview
Over the course of his life, Darwin went from being a devout
Anglican, who had intended to become a minister and believed
that the natural world was evidence of God’s providence, to
being an agnostic who believed that human beings were the
chance result of natural processes.
The revolution in thought and worldview brought about by the
theory of natural selection is one of the most profound to have
effected us.
Although almost all biologists now accept natural selection, it is
still difficult for many lay people to accept. It is still disputed
from the perspectives of both religion and “common sense.”
From the perspective of worldviews, we should remember that
it often takes a long time for a new worldview to take hold. A
change in worldview involves many cultural and social factors
that do not always follow a clear logic.
30 / 30