Effect of Particle Crushing On Shear Strength and
Effect of Particle Crushing On Shear Strength and
Effect of Particle Crushing On Shear Strength and
net/publication/287524125
CITATIONS READS
29 1,791
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Amir Hamidi on 26 January 2018.
Abstract: There are limitations in experimental studies on sand-gravel mixtures due to the small size of testing
specimens. Due to this problem, many researchers have worked on prediction of the shear strength of mixture by testing
the sandy fraction of soil alone and developed empirical relationships. Most of the previous relationships have been
determined for low surcharge pressures in which particle breakage does not affect the shear strength parameters.
However, the particle breakage affects the relationships in higher confinements. At the present study, the results of
large scale direct shear tests on sand and sand-gravel mixtures was used to investigate the shear behavior and
dilatancy characteristics in a wider range of surcharge pressures. The gravel content, relative density, surcharge
pressure and gravel grain size were considered as variables in testing program. The relationships between shear
strength characteristics of sand and sand-gravel mixtures were determined considering dilation characteristics of the
soil. In this regard, the minimum void ratio was found as a useful indirect index that relates uniquely to the critical
state friction angle independent of soil gradation. The relations between critical state or peak friction angles of the
mixture with minimum void ratio were determined as a function of surcharge pressure. The correlations could be useful
for determination of the strength parameters of sand-gravel composites by testing sandy fraction of mixture.
Keywords: sand-gravel mixture, direct shear tests, dilation, friction angle, surcharge pressure, particle crushing
effects, minimum void ratio.
Twenty years later, Simoni and Houlsby [7] The uniform, clean, quartz beach sand with
used this approach to present similar correlations sub-rounded to sub-angular grains from the
for sand-gravel mixtures. They used the original shores of Caspian Sea was used as the base
method of Bolton [8] to relate the shear strength material in the tests. Rounded gravel grains with
of mixture to associated values for finer fraction maximum grain sizes of 12.5 and 25.4 mm were
of the soil. In their research, the large scale direct used as oversized particles for mixing with base
shear apparatus was used to identify the shear soil. As a result two sand-gravel mixtures with
strength of sandy soil mixed with gravel content different gravel grain sizes were considered in
up to 60 percents which was the threshold value testing program. The gravel grains were mixed
for floating state of oversized particles. They with the base sand in three weight percentages of
modified the original index proposed by Bolton 20, 40 and 60. Figure 1 shows the gradation
[8] for sand-gravel mixtures using the minimum curves of the sand-gravel mixtures with
void ratios of sand (e min, sand ) and mixture maximum gravel grain sizes of 12.5 and 25.4
( emin, mixture ) as follows: mm. The maximum and minimum void ratios
were determined for different mixtures according
I R,mixture = 5 D r ,mixture − (1 − 4 .3 ( emin,s and − emin, mixture )) (4) to ASTM-D4253 and ASTM-D4254 and the
specific gravity values for sand and sand-gravel
The modified index can be used in equation (3) mixtures have been determined according to
to determine the shear strength of mixture. The ASTM-D854. Table 1 shows the main properties
direct shear tests reported by Simoni and Houlsby of soils used in present study.
[7] were all conducted under a constant surcharge Figure 2 shows the variation of maximum void
pressure of approximately 90 kPa which was less ratio (emax,mixture) and minimum void ratio
than the beginning limit of particle breakage ( emin, mixture ) with gravel content for the mixtures
effect. Bolton [8, 9] observed that the tendency contain gravel grains with maximum size of 12.5
for particles to crush under shear is not and 25.4 mm. The figure demonstrates that the
appreciable when the mean shear is lower than threshold gravel content for the floating state is
80 0.8
Sand + 40% gravel
Sand + 60% gravel
60
em in ,mix ture
0.6
40
0.4
20
0.2
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0
Grain Size (mm) 0 20 40 60 80 100
Gravel cont ent (% )
Max. Gravel Size, 25.4 mm
100 1
Sand
Gravel 12.5 mm
sand + 20% gravel 25.4 mm
P ercent finer by weight (%)
80 0.8
sand + 40% gravel
sand + 60% gravel
60
0.6
e m ax,m ix ture
40
0.4
20
0.2
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0
Grain size (mm) 0 20 40 60 80 100
mixtures
Fig.2 Maximum and minimum void ratios of different
mixtures
Table 1 Properties of soils used in present study
Soil Maximum D60 (mm) D10(mm) Coefficient of Specific Table.2 Variables considered at the testing program
grain uniformity, Cu gravity, G s
size (mm)
Sand 1.2 0.28 0.16 1.75 2.74 Variable unit Values
Gravel No. 1 12.5 1.14 0.98 1.16 2.64 Grave l content % 0, 20, 40, 60
Gravel No. 2 25.4 2.28 1.96 1.16 2.64
Grave l size mm 12.5, 25.4
Relative density % 35, 60, 85
about 60 percents. The oversized particles are Overburden pressure kPa 150, 300, 450
floated in sandy matrix without considerable
contact in gravel contents less than 60 percents.
Increasing the gravel content from this value, method in three layers were 35, 60 and 85
results in a firm contact of gravel particles percents.
together and non-floated state for the mixture. Figures 3 and 4 show typical results of direct
shear tests on sand-gravel mixtures with
3. Direct shear tests maximum gravel grain size of 12.5 mm for two
gravel contents of 20 and 60 in relative densities
Consolidated-drained large scale direct shear of 35, 60 and 85 percents under a surcharge
tests were conducted on completely dry samples. pressure of 450 kPa. The figures include
The size of shear box apparatus was about variations of normalized shear stress, dilation and
300*300*170 mm. Table 2 summarizes the dilation rate with shear displacement. As the
variables considered in experimental study. The figures show, the peak shear strength increases
vertical surcharge pressures of 150, 300 and 450 with increase in relative density which is mainly
kPa were used and the relative densities of attributed to an increase in contribution of
samples which were prepared by dry compaction dilatancy to shear resistance.
The maximum rate of dilation was found to The critical state friction angle shows the shear
coincide, as expected, with the peak value of the strength of soil mass that is continuously
normalized shear strength as shown in figures. It deforming at constant volume, constant normal
was used to determine the maximum angle of effective stress, constant shear stress and constant
dilationan( ψ =max). rate of shear strain as defined by Poulos et al.
[10]. It is an important parameter both in design
4. Analysis of results and interpretation of shear test results. Haeri and
Hamidi [11] showed that the critical state of
In order to investigate the shear strength and gravely sands occurs in axial strains of 20
dilatancy characteristics for sand-gravel mixtures percents and more in triaxial condition. At the
considered in this study, and considering the present study, the direct shear tests continued up
effect of different variables on them, some to shear strains about 15 percents. As a result,
parameters like the constant volume or critical there is some difference between the friction
state friction angle besides dilatancy and peak angle determined using ultimate stresses and the
kPa kPa
kPa kPa
kPa kPa
kPa kPa
kPa kPa
Fig.8. Variation of ϕ max − ϕ cv :with relative density for Fig.9 Variation of maximum dilatancy b(ψ max ) with
different surcharge pressures relative density for different surcharge pressures
kPa
kPa
Fig.10 Bolton's [8] equation for sand-gravel mixtures Fig.12 Effect of surcharge pressure and relevant
tested under different surcharge pressures particle crushing on maximum friction angle for different
mixtures
besides ϕ cv ,)/ψ max and (ϕ max − ϕcv )/ψ max ratio (b).
Finally figure 13 shows failure envelopes of
sand-gravel mixture with maximum gravel grain
size of 25.4 mm in different relative densities. As
figure shows the envelope moves up with
increase in relative density. However, its slope
decreases as surcharge pressure increases. The
slope of failure envelope is an indicator of
maximum friction angle. As a result it can be
concluded that increase in surcharge pressure
Fig.11 Variation of b coefficient with minimum void slightly decreases the maximum friction angle
ratio for different surcharge pressures value. This phenomenon can directly be related to
particle crushing and its major effect on shear
Figure 12 shows the variation of maximum strength characteristics of sand-gravel mixtures.
friction angle ( ϕ max ) with relative density for
different mixtures tested under two surcharge 5. Empirical equations
pressures of 300 and 450 kPa. As the figure
shows, the maximum friction angle increases In this part, simple empirical equations are
with gravel content and relative density. sought to describe the strength characteristics of
However, it decreases with increase in surcharge the sand when mixed with gravel grains. Such
pressure. This reduction can be related mainly to equations may be applicable to other similar
the particle crushing effects take place under materials. Since shear tests on coarse granular
higher surcharge pressures. It can be concluded soils are difficult, expressions are sought which
that the overall trend in ϕ max results from a could be useful for practical purposes, i.e.
combination of changes in surcharge pressure relations based on easily measurable parameters.
As indicated in figure 7, there is a unique ϕcv , mixture − ϕcv ,s and = I s ( emin, sand − emin, mixture ) (7)
relationship between minimum void ratio
( emin, mixture ) and critical state or constant volume In this equation, Is is a function of surcharge
friction angle ( ϕ cv,mixture ) for mixtures with pressure which includes relevant effects of
different gradations. By considering the particle crushing on the relationship and is defied
difference between minimum void ratios of sand- as follows for different mixtures:
gravel mixtures and pure sandy soil
Is = σv
0.65
( emin, sand − emin, mixture ), it is possible to obtain a (8)
unique relationship describing the variation of
ϕ cv, mixture for mixtures with different gradations. The value of surcharge pressure ( σ v ) should be
This is performed in figure 14 for mixtures tested considered in kPa at this equation. The equation
under different surcharge pressures. As the figure proposed by Simoni and Houlsby [7] that
shows, the relation is independent of the gravel
content and grain size and is unique for different
gradations. However, the surcharge pressure
affects the relationship between critical state
friction angle and minimum void ratio of the soil.
Using a simple linear regression to data
presented in the figures, the following equation
can be determined which illustrates the variations
of the critical state or constant volume friction
angle of sand-gravel mixture ( ϕ cv,mixture ) based on
the corresponding value for sandy soil (ϕ cv, sand ).
Different and more complex regression types can
be used to receive a better fit, but is hardly Fig.14 Empirical equation describing the variation of
justified by the data. constant volume friction angle of different mixtures with
minimum void ratio
68
corresponds to surcharge pressure of 90 kPa is
also included in this figure. The amount of
particle crushing increases with increase in
surcharge pressure. This shows direct relation of
these two parameters together. Indeed the effects
of particle crushing are considered by surcharge
pressure value in suggested empirical equation.
To describe the complex interactions ruling the
dilatancy contribution to the peak friction angle
( ϕ max − ϕ cv ), involving peak dilatancy angle ( ψ max
), relative density ( Dr ) and surcharge pressure
( σ v ), the Bolton's [8] equation is considered
again as starting point and is modified as
required. Equation (3) effectively relates three
interdependent variables ϕ max − ϕ cv , ψ max and Dr .
There is different ways to fit the experimental
data to a correlation. The procedure adopted here
is using simple linear regression applied to the
data pertaining to any particular mixture in each
of the different planes, ( ϕ max − ϕ cv : ψ max ), ( Dr
: ψ max ) and ( Dr : ϕ max − ϕ cv ). The coefficients
obtained (slope and/or intercepts) for each
mixture have been plotted against difference
between minimum void ratios ( emin, sand − e min,mixture )
and then regression analysis used to find an
appropriate expression for the variations. The
variation with surcharge pressure ( σ v ) is also
considered on each plane to determine the
changes in slope and intercept of the regression Fig.15 Variation of b coefficient with surcharge
fitting lines with these parameters. pressure and relative density
In this regard, Bolton's [8] was modified by contribution of dilation in shear strength of
substituting for the constant 0.8 an expression mixture. The fitting lines have an intercept of 0.8;
describing the variation of the b coefficient in hence equation (9) reduces to Bolton's [8]
equation 6 as follows: original equation when no gravel is present.
The relative density and surcharge has to be
ϕ max, mixture − ϕcv ,mixture = [0. 8 − (3 − 0 . 003σ v )⋅ (emin, sand − emin, mixture )]⋅ψ max (9) related simultaneously to ϕ max − ϕ cv and ψ max . It is
expected that equation (3) proposed by Bolton [8]
In this equation, σ v is the surcharge pressure in changes to the following form to account for the
kPa. The procedure follows the earlier surcharge pressure and relevant effects of particle
observation that the minimum void ratio provides breakage:
a useful index that related well to the critical state
friction angle independent of soil gradation. (ϕ max − ϕ cv ) mixture = b ψ max = 5 I R, S (10)
Figure 15 shows the trend of coefficient b
showed in equation 9 with emin, sand − e min,mixture for IR,S is the modified value of IR suggested by
different relative densities and surcharge Simoni and Houlsby [7] in equation 4 for
pressures. Again, data for mixtures with different surcharge pressure and relevant to the slopes of
gradations are used in this figure. As shown in linear regression in planes ( ϕ max − ϕ cv :IR,S) and
the figure, the b value increases with increase in ( ψ max :IR,S). This relationship is obtained by fitting
surcharge pressure which shows the more the experimental data points in the mentioned
[ ]
I R,S = 5 D r ,mixture − 1 + (4 .5 − 0. 006σ v )⋅ (emin, sand − emin, mixture ) (11)
70
be determined based on the corresponding values (2004). "Undrained shear strength of
for sandy soil and without performing shear granular soils with different particle
strength tests on sandy soil containing oversized gradations." J. Geotech. and Geoenv.
particles. The effects of surcharge pressure and Engrg., ASCE, 130(6), 621-629.
associated particle crushing are also included in
these relations and comparison with experimental [7] Simoni, A. and Houlsby, G.T. (2006). "The
results approved its accuracy. direct shear strength and dilatancy of sand-
gravel mixtures." Geotech. and Geol.
7. Acknowledgments Engrg., 24(3), 523-549.
The studies are performed in Civil Engineering [8] Bolton, M.D. (1986). "The strength and
Laboratory at School of Engineering of Tarbiat dilatancy of sands" Géotechnique., 36(1),
Moallem University under a grant presented by 65-78.
Vice Chancellor in Research that is
acknowledged. [9] Bolton, M.D. (1987). "The strength and
dilatancy of sands" Discussion.
References Géotechnique., 37(1), 219-226.
[1] Fragaszy, R.J., Su, W. and Siddiqi, F.H. [10] Poulos, S.J., Castro, G. and France, J.W.
(1990). "Effect of oversized particles on the (1985). "Liquefaction evaluation
density of clean granular soils." Geotech. procedure." ASCE, J. Geotech. Engrg.
Test. J., 13(2), 106-114. 111(6), 772-792.
[2] Fragaszy, R.J., Su, W., Siddiqi, F.H. and Ho, [11] Haeri, S.M. and Hamidi, A. (2005). "Steady
C.L. (1992). "Modeling strength of sandy state and liquefaction characteristics of
gravel." J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, gravely sands." Geotech. Geol. Engrg. J.,
118(6), 920-935. 23(2), 141-156.
[3] Evans, M.D. and Zhou, S. (1995). [12] Yazdanjou, V., Salimi, N. and Hamidi, A.,
"Liquefaction behavior of sand-gravel (2008). "Effect of gravel content on the
composites." J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., shear behavior of sandy soils" Proc. of 4th
ASCE, 121(3), 287-298. National Congress on Civil Engrg., Tehran
University, Iran.
[4] Yagiz, S. (2001). "Brief note on the
influence of shape and percentage of gravel [13] Salimi, N., Yazdanjou, V. and Hamidi, A.
on the shear strength of sand and gravel (2008). "Shape and size effects of gravel
mixture." Bul. Engrg. Geol. and Env., 60(4), grains on the shear behavior of sandy soils."
321-323. Proceedings of 10th Int. Conf. on
Landslides and Engineered Slopes., Chen et
[5] Vallejo, L.E. (2001). "Interpretation of the al (eds.), China, 469-474.
limits in shear strength in binary granular
mixtures." Can. Geotech. J., 38(5), 1097- [14] Hamidi, A., Yazdanjou, V. and Salimi, N.
1104. (2009). "Shear strength characteristics of
sand-gravel mixtures." Int. J. Geotech.
[6] Kokusho, T., Hara, T. and Hiraoka, R. Engrg., 3(1), 29-38.