JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND RESEARCH

SYNTHESES

Reviewer Date

Author Year Record Number

Not
Yes No Unclear
applicable

1. Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated?

√ □ □ □
2. Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review
question? √ □ □ □
3. Was the search strategy appropriate?
√ □ □ □
4. Were the sources and resources used to search for
studies adequate? √ □ □ □
5. Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate?
□ □ √ □
6. Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more
reviewers independently? □ □ √ □
7. Were there methods to minimize errors in data
extraction? √ □ □ □
8. Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate?
□ □ √ □
9. Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed?
√ □ □ □
10. Were recommendations for policy and/or practice
supported by the reported data? √ □ □ □
11. Were the specific directives for new research
appropriate? √ □ □ □
Overall appraisal: Include □ Exclude □ □
Seek further info

Comments (Including reason for exclusion)

PEMBAHASAN

Critical Appraisal untuk jurnal ini menggunakan tools JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist
for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses dengan 11 pertanyaan.

No Pertanyaan Jawaban
1. Is the review question Yes, karena Pertanyaan penelitian sudah dicantumkan
clearly and explicitly dengan jelas di bagian abstrak dan background
stated? penelitian, serta pada jurnal ini sudah mengungkapkan
populasi dan problem yang diteliti (P), jenis intervensi
(I), namun tidak terlihat kelompok pembanding (C),
dan terdapat hasil akhir (O) yang dinilai
Pertanyaan penelitian:
1. What learning outcomes have been linked to
games in nursing education?
2. What does research indicate are potential gaps
in the field’s knowledge regarding games in
nursing education?
2. Were the inclusion criteria Ya, sudah tercantum di jurnalnya.
appropriate for the review
question? “Search inclusion criteria included articles discussing
games in the education of undergraduate nursing
students in various nursing specialties but excluded
research specifically focused on simulations.
Specifically, articles were excluded if they focused on
simulation-based learning, virtual simulation, or high-
or low-fidelity simulator manikins. Because much has
already been written on simulations in nursing, the
focus of this literature search was narrowed to
educational games in the classroom”
3. Was the search strategy Ya, pada jurnal telah dijelaskan strategi pencarian
appropriate? literature menggunakan database dari tahun 2009-2019
dengan keyword “Gaming in Nursing Education” dan
“Games in nursing education”. Peneliti telah mencari
literatur dengan keyword yang relevan dengan
pertanyaan penelitian.
“A literature search was completed using CINAHL®
and Google™ Scholar databases to identify all
relevant articles from 2009 to 2019 using the keywords
“gaming in nursing education” and “games in nursing
education.”
4. Were the sources and Yes, pada jurnal penelitian telah disebutkan bahwa
resources used to search database yang digunakan adalah CINAHL dan google
for studies adequate? Schoolar. Namun akan lebih baik lagi sumbernya
 ditambah dengan database yang terindex lebih baik.

“A literature search was completed using CINAHL®

and Google™ Scholar databases to identify all
relevant articles from 2009 to 2019 using the keywords
“gaming in nursing education” and “games in nursing
education.”
5. Were the criteria for Unclear, tidak terlihat dengan jelas di jurnal tersebut
appraising studies kriteria untuk menilai literatur atau studi nya, tetapi
appropriate? pada jurnal peneliti mengatakan bahwa hanya artikel
empiris yang menguji intervensi yang termasuk
kriteria.
6. Was critical appraisal Unclear, tidak terlihat jelas pada jurnal apakah peneliti
conducted by two or more yang menjadi reviewers sendiri atau independet atau
reviewers independently? ada reviewer lain yang ikut membantu.
7. Were there methods to Ya, data disajikan dalam bentuk tabel agar
minimize errors in data memudahkan menilai dan membandingkan tiap
extraction? literatur
8. Were the methods used to Unclear
combine studies
appropriate?
9. Was the likelihood of Ya, kemungkinan bias dapat dikurangi dengan strategi
publication bias assessed? pencarian yang komprehensif serta proses seleksi
literatur baik itu melalui metode appraisal atau
berdasarkan kriteria inklusi dan ekslusi nya. Pada
jurnal telah dinyatakan bahwa hasil dari pencarian
literature diperoleh 49 literatur yang akan di review,
dari 49 tersebut tersisa 15 literatur yang akan di review
yang sesuai dengan kriteria inklusi penelitian. Akan
lebih baik lagi proses pencarian dan seleksi data untuk
mengurangi bias ini disajikan dalam bentuk diagram
agar lebih mudah dipahami.
10 Were recommendations Ya,
. for policy and/or practice
supported by the reported Didalam jurnal sudah dijelaskan bahwa dari hasil
data? penelitian dilaporkan data bahwa:
 Fourteen of the fifteen articles reported
beneficial learning outcomes with games, such
as increased knowledge, higher test scores, and
positive student comments
 Additional gaming genres which were reported
to have increased test scores and knowledge
associated with each game
  gaming can help students retain information
better when used appropriately by educators in
the right contexts. Even simple, low-cost games
can be effective in supplementing didactic
methods, and nurse educators should use and
share existing resources when available to
decrease barriers to usage
 Ninety-four percent of students surveyed
indicated they liked using technology to
enhance their education, and 88% believed
educators should make better use of video
games for nursing education
 Johnsen et al. (2018) found 78% of students
agreed that serious games should be developed
for other patient conditions to be used in
nursing education
Recommendations for policy and/or practice:
 Contemporary nursing education pedagogy
must change to provide students with more
meaningful, experiential learning activities that
can promote deeper learning to enhance new
nurses’ practice readiness .
 gaming may have positive effects on short- and
long-term knowledge retention, student
enjoyment, student confidence levels, student
empathy, student motivation and engagement,
as well as students’ perceptions of being better
prepared for simulation
rekomendasi untuk kebijakan dan praktiknya telah di
dukung dengan data penelitian bahwa game memiliki
pengaruh yang positif terhadap pembelajaran siswa dan
pembelajaran menggunakan game dapat dikembangkan
dan di aplikasikan di nursing education.
11 Were the specific Ya, telah dijelaskan di dalam jurnal/artikel :
. directives for new
research appropriate?  Future research should examine whether games
that involve “playing in a safe space” could
reduce anxiety and improve performance in
simulation and clinical practice
 research also is needed to identify what types of
nursing curriculum lend best to gaming as an
educational strategy
 Future research should examine ways to reduce
faculty barriers for implementation of new
games and technologies in the classroom,
including collaboration and ways to share
effective games that are developed between
 institutions
 Research variables for future studies should go
beyond student satisfaction and perception of
their experiences, and use evidence-based and
validated tools to measure additional outcomes,
such as gaming effects on self-efficacy,
teamwork performance, and clinical judgment