0% found this document useful (0 votes)
71 views

Final Essay Possession

This document provides a marking grid for literature and culture essays on the BA in English Language & Culture at Utrecht University. It includes categories to be completed by the student like name, student number, essay title, and word count. It also includes categories to be completed by the examiner like content, structure, citation style, grammar, and a final mark. The grid provides guidance on how essays will be evaluated in these areas and space for comments. It also includes an intellectual property statement that students must certify they have read and understood regarding plagiarism.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
71 views

Final Essay Possession

This document provides a marking grid for literature and culture essays on the BA in English Language & Culture at Utrecht University. It includes categories to be completed by the student like name, student number, essay title, and word count. It also includes categories to be completed by the examiner like content, structure, citation style, grammar, and a final mark. The grid provides guidance on how essays will be evaluated in these areas and space for comments. It also includes an intellectual property statement that students must certify they have read and understood regarding plagiarism.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

MARKING GRID FOR LITERATURE & CULTURE ESSAYS ON THE

BA IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE & CULTURE AT UTRECHT UNIVERSITY

To be completed by student and stapled, this side up, to the front of the essay:

Name Annemiek Blaauwgeers

Student number 5519950

Address Fregatstraat 157, 3534RD Utrecht

Essay title A.S. Byatt’s Possession Not Just Possessed


The Importance and Different Usages of the Word ‘Possession’
Word count 804
(excl. quotations)
Course The Writers’ Lab

Date 25 October 2015

Signature*

*signifying you have read & understood the plagiarism declaration overleaf.

To be completed by examiner (name):

Category [ Code] Description Comments (if appropriate) Mark


Content quality, argumentation,
(60%) scope & reading, response x6=
to assignment, elegance
Structure title, identifiable thesis/
(10%) main claim & topic
sentences, cohesion
[ MLA ] parenthetical references
(10%) works cited, layout &
word count
[G] grammatical accuracy &
(10%) use of complex structures
[RSVP] register, repetition &
(10%) redundancy,
spelling, vocabulary &
punctuation
Final Mark

NB. To the student: once you have received your returned essay please post a corrected version
in the appropriate Blackboard folder. If you have questions, make an appointment with the
examiner & bring with you both the version you handed in & the corrected version.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STATEMENT

Utrecht University defines “plagiarism” as follows:

“If, in a thesis or some other paper, data or parts of a text produced by someone else are
used without the source being identified, this shall be considered plagiarism. Among other
things, plagiarism may entail the following:

cutting and pasting text from digital sources such as encyclopaedias or digital
journals, without using quotations marks and references;

cutting and pasting any text from the internet without using quotation marks and
references;

copying from printed material such as books, journals or encyclopaedias without


using quotations marks and references;

using a translation of the above texts in your own work, without using quotations
marks and references;

paraphrasing the above texts without using references. A paraphrase should never
consist of merely replacing some words by synonyms;

using pictures, sound recordings, or test materials produced by others without


references, such that it appears that this is one’s own work;

copying work by other students and passing this off as one’s own work. If this is done
with the other student’s consent, the latter shall be an accomplice to the plagiarism;

even in cases where plagiarism is committed by one of the authors collaborating on a


paper, the other authors shall be accomplices to plagiarism if they could or ought to
have known that the first-mentioned author was committing plagiarism;

submitting papers acquired from a commercial source (such as an internet site


offering summaries or complete essays) or written by someone else for payment.”

I have read the above definition of plagiarism and certify with my signature on the
preceding page that I have not committed plagiarism in the appended essay or paper.
Blaauwgeers 1

Annemiek Blaauwgeers

5519950

Fregatstraat 157, 3534 RD Utrecht

The Writers’ Lab

British English

25 October 2015

804 Words

A.S. Byatt’s Possession Not Just Possessed

the Importance and Different Usages of the Word ‘Possession’

“I don’t know why I feel so possessive about the damned things” (A.S. Byatt 91), are the

words Roland sighs when he realizes how obsessed he has become with the letters

written by Ash, and he is not the only one, nor is it the only thing he is possessed by.

Love, the past, different objects and their careers are all holding the main characters of

A.S. Byatt’s Possession in their grasp. It drives them forward, influences their decisions

and makes up the flow of the story. Aside from being the title, the word possession recurs

often in Possession and has many different usages which are important for the story.

From all these different usages, three are the most prominent and could be considered the

most important for the novel: materialistic possessions, being possessed by love and

being possessed by one’s career and the past.

The most obvious and important usage of ‘possession’ is the possession of materials.

Similar to how “the tricksy hero Herakles / Came to his dispossession and the theft” (Byatt 3)

of the golden fruit in Ash’s The Garden of Proserpina, Roland steals the drafts of Ash’s
Blaauwgeers 2

letters to Christabel, which is the beginning of his and Maud’s quest for knowledge. The

letters between the two Victorian poets are the central point of the story, as the main modern

characters are possessed by the contents of the letters while vying to possess them. Roland

and Maud, for example, are both deeply possessed by the answers the letters hold about Ash

and Christabel’s relationship, whereas Cropper merely wants to possess these relics of the

past which once belonged to the man he greatly admires. Aside from the letters many other

materialistic possessions are important for the story, another being, for example, the jet hair

brooch of Maud which she inherited from Christabel. It is only because of these materials the

truth about Ash and Christabel’s secret relationship finds the light and the fight to possess

these materials brings tension to the story. Thus materialistic possession is one of the most

important usages of the word ‘possession.’

Another reading of ‘possession’ which plays a big part in the novel is being possessed

by love. It is love which drives Ash to cheat on his wife, it is love which finally convinces

Christabel to leave her refuge, and while discovering and studying this love Roland and Maud

fall under the other’s spell themselves. Ash describes his love for Christabel as “a sort of

madness. A possession, as by daemons” (Byatt 453) to his wife Ellen, while Christabel tries to

resist this mad love initially. This rejection of falling in love with another is an important

aspect of this usage of ‘possession,’ as it is an essential part of both Christabel and Maud’s

personalities. The two female protagonists deflect the love of Ash and Roland at first because

they fear the loss of autonomy which comes with tying yourself to a man. They value first and

foremost their self-possession, detest the confining social roles of women and dislike the idea

of being possessed by a man. Contrary to Ash, Maud says “love is terrible, it is a wrecker”

(Byatt 507). Because it drives and defines both the Victorian and modern main characters,

being possessed by love or rejecting this possession is an important usage of ‘possession’ for

the novel.
Blaauwgeers 3

While self-possession is important for Maud, it is her career she values even more. All

the modern main characters are possessed by their careers, and all being scholars studying the

lives of past poets and writers, the past is what drives them the most. As Cropper says in his

fictional autobiography: “my passion was for the past / the dead man had touched me from the

past” (Byatt 101, 103), the dead man referring to Ash. It is because he and Roland are

possessed by knowing all about this man from the past they are so interested in the letters

written by him. They both want to expand their collection of the relics he left behind, just as

Maud is obsessed by Christabel LaMotte’s life. On their quest, Roland and Maud are not only

deciphering the past, but also retracing it and following in the dead poets’ footsteps. However,

because Roland is completely possessed by his career and a past man’s life, he gradually loses

Val. This shows this possession by their careers and the past is the cause of many twists in

the novel, but more importantly, without this obsession Roland and Maud would not have

embarked upon their quest or fallen in love, thus making this usage of ‘possession’ essential

for the novel too.

The three most important usages of ‘possession’ used in A.S. Byatt’s Possession are

the materialistic possessions, mainly the letters between Ash and Christabel, being possessed

by love, which drives the characters to do or not do certain things, and being possessed by

one’s career and the past, which sets in motion the main storyline. There are many more

different readings and usages of ‘possession,’ but it are these three which truly make up the

story of Possession.
Blaauwgeers 4

Works Cited

Adams, Ann Marie. “Dead Authors, Born Readers, and Defunct Critics: Investigating

Ambiguous Critical Identities in A. S. Byatt’s Possession.” The Journal of the

Midwest Modern Language Association 36.1 (2003): 107-124. Web. 13 Sept. 2015

Byatt, A.S. Possession. London: Vintage, 1991. Print.

Heilman, Robert B. “A. S. Byatt’s Possession Observed.” The Sewanee Review 103.4

(1995): 605-612. Web. 12 Sept. 2015

Hennelly, Mark M. Jr. ““Repeating Patterns” and Textual Pleasures: Reading (In) A. S.

Byatt’s Possession: A Romance.” Contemporary Literature 44.3 (2003): 442-471.

Web. 13 Sept. 2015

Shinn, Thelma J. ““What’s in a word?” Possessing A.S. Byatt’s meronymic novel.” Papers

on

Language & Literature 31.2 (1995): 164-172. Web. 27 Sept. 2015

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy