Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management: MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING-Solutions Manual
Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management: MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING-Solutions Manual
Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management: MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING-Solutions Manual
CHAPTER 9
I. Questions
1. The three levels available are: Level 1, in which a company uses a
plantwide overhead rate; Level 2, in which a company uses departmental
overhead rates; and Level 3, in which a company uses activity-based
costing.
2. New approaches to costing are needed because events of the last few
decades have made drastic changes in many organizations. Automation
has greatly decreased the amount of direct labor required to manufacture
products; product diversity has increased in that companies are
manufacturing a wider range of products and these products differ
substantially in volume, lot size, and complexity of design; and total
overhead cost has increased to the point in some companies that a
correlation no longer exists between it and direct labor.
3. The departmental approach to assigning overhead cost to products relies
solely on volume as an assignment base. Where diversity exists between
products (that is, where products differ in terms of number of units
produced, lot size, or complexity of production), volume alone is not
adequate for overhead costing. Overhead costing based on volume will
systematically overcost high-volume products and undercost low-volume
products.
4. Process value analysis (PVA) is a systematic approach to gaining an
understanding of the steps associated with a product or service. It
identifies all resource-consuming activities involved in the production
process and labels these activities as being either value-added or non-
value-added. Thus, it is the beginning point in designing an activity-
based costing system since management must know what activities are
involved with each product before activity centers can be designated and
cost drivers established. Also, PVA helps management to eliminate any
non-value-added activities and thereby streamline operations and
minimize costs.
5. The four general levels of activities are:
11-1
Chapter 11 Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management
11-2
Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management Chapter 11
11-3
Chapter 11 Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management
III. Exercises
Exercise 1
Examples of Examples of
Activity Traceable Cost
Activity Classification Costs Drivers
a. Materials are Batch-level Labor cost; Number of
moved from the depreciation receipts;
receiving dock to pounds
of equipment;
product flow lines handled
space cost
by a material-
handling crew
b. Direct labor Unit-level Direct labor Direct labor-
workers assemble cost; indirect hours
various products labor cost;
labor benefits
c. Ongoing training is Facility-level* Space cost; Hours of
provided to all training costs; training time;
employees in the administration number
company costs trained
d. A product is Product-level Space cost; Hours of
designed by a supplies used; design time;
specialized design depreciation of number of
team design engineering
equipment change orders
e. Equipment setups Batch-level Labor cost; Number of
are performed on a supplies used; setups; hours
regular basis depreciation of or setup time
equipment
f. Numerical control Unit-level Power; Machine-
(NC) machines are supplies used; hours; number
used to cut and maintenance; of units
shape materials depreciation
11-4
Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management Chapter 11
Exercise 2
Exercise 3
Note: Some of these classifications are debatable and may depend on the
specific circumstances found in particular companies.
Exercise 4
11-5
Chapter 11 Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management
Exercise 5
Requirement 1
The unit product costs under the company’s traditional costing system are
computed as follows:
Special Regular
Direct materials................................................................................................................
P60.00 P45.00
Direct labor......................................................................................................................
9.60 7.20
Manufacturing overhead (0.8 DLH × P5.80 per DLH;
0.6 DLH × P5.80 per DLH)........................................................................................
4.64 3.48
Unit product cost..............................................................................................................
P74.24 P55.68
Requirement 2
(a)
Estimate (b)
11-6
Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management Chapter 11
d
Overhead Total (a) ÷ (b)
Activities Cost Expected Activity Activity Rate
Supporting direct labor..............................
P150,000 50,000 DLHs P3 per DLH
Batch setups...............................................
P60,000 250 setup P24 per setup
s 0
Safety testing..............................................
P80,000 100 tests P80 per test
0
Special Product:
(a) (b) (a) × (b)
Activity Cost Pool Activity Rate Activity ABC Cost
Supporting direct labor........................................................ P3 per DLH 8,000 DLHs P24,000
Batch setups.........................................................................
P240 per setup 200 setups 48,000
Safety testing........................................................................
P800 per test 80 tests 64,000
Total P136,000
Regular Product:
(a) (b) (a) × (b)
Activity Cost Pool Activity Rate Activity ABC Cost
Supporting direct labor........................................................ P3 per DLH 42,000 DLHs P126,000
Batch setups.........................................................................
P240 per setup 50 setups 12,000
Safety testing........................................................................
P800 per test 20 tests 16,000
Total P154,000
Special Regular
Direct materials...................................................................................................
P60.00 P45.00
Direct labor.........................................................................................................
9.60 7.20
Manufacturing overhead (P136,000 ÷ 10,000 units; P154,000
÷ 70,000 units)...............................................................................................
13.60 2.20
Unit product cost.................................................................................................
P83.20 P54.40
IV. Problems
Problem 1
11-7
Chapter 11 Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management
Requirement 1
(a)
Total overhead = P200,000 + P32,000 + P100,000 + P120,000
= P452,000
Requirement 2
11-8
Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management Chapter 11
Requirement 1
11-9
Chapter 11 Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management
The first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools appears below:
Requirement 2
Requirement 3
Requirement 4
11-10
Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management Chapter 11
Requirement 1
a. When direct labor-hours are used to apply overhead cost to products, the
company’s predetermined overhead rate would be:
Predetermined Manufacturing overhead cost
=
overhead rate Direct labor hours
P1,480,000
= = P74 per DLH
20,000 DLHs
b. Model
HY5 AS2
Direct materials......................................................................
P35.00 P25.00
Direct labor:
P20 per hour × 0.2 DLH, 0.4 DLH.................................... 4.00 8.00
Manufacturing overhead:
P74 per hour × 0.2 DLH, 0.4 DLH.................................... 14.80 29.60
Total unit product cost...........................................................
P53.80 P62.60
Requirement 2
11-11
Chapter 11 Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management
(a) (b)
Estimated Estimated (a) ÷ (b)
Activity Cost Pool Total Cost Total Activity Activity Rate
Machine setups................P180,000 250 setups P720 per setup
Special milling.................P300,000 1,000 MHs P300 per MH
General factory................
P1,000,000 20,000 DLHs P50 per DLH
Model HY5
(a) (a) × (b)
Predetermined (b) Overhead
Activity Cost Pool Overhead Rate Activity Applied
Machine setups....................................................................................
P720 per setup 150 setups P108,000
Special milling....................................................................................
P300 per MH 1,000 MHs 300,000
General factory....................................................................................
P50 per DLH 4,000 DLHs 200,000
Total manufacturing overhead cost (a)............................................... P608,000
Number of units produced (b)............................................................. 20,000
Overhead cost per unit (a) ÷ (b).......................................................... P30.40
Model AS2
(a) (a) × (b)
Predetermined (b) Overhead
Activity Cost Pool Overhead Rate Activity Applied
Machine setups....................................................................................
P720 per setup 100 setups P 72,000
Special milling....................................................................................
P300 per MH 0 MHs 0
General factory....................................................................................
P50 per DLH 16,000 DLHs 800,000
Total manufacturing overhead cost (a)............................................... P872,000
Number of units produced (b)............................................................. 40,000
Overhead cost per unit (a) ÷ (b).......................................................... P21.80
11-12
Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management Chapter 11
Direct labor (P20 per DLH × 0.2 DLH; P20 per DLH × 04.DLH).......................... 4.00 8.00
Manufacturing overhead (above).............................................................................
30.40 21.80
Total unit product cost..............................................................................................
P69.40 P54.80
Comparing these unit cost figures with the unit costs in Part 1(b), we
find that the unit product cost for Model HY5 has increased from P53.80
to P69.40, and the unit product cost for Model AS2 has decreased from
P62.60 to P54.80.
Requirement 3
Thus, the shift in overhead cost from the high-volume product (Model AS2)
to the low-volume product (Model HY5) occurred as a result of reassigning
only 32% of the company’s overhead costs.
The increase in unit product cost for Model HY5 can be explained as
follows: First, where possible, overhead costs have been traced to the
products rather than being lumped together and spread uniformly over
production. Therefore, the special milling costs, which are traceable to
Model HY5, have all been assigned to Model HY5 and none assigned to
Model AS2 under the activity-based costing approach. It is common in
industry to have some products that require special handling or special
milling of some type. This is especially true in modern factories that produce
a variety of products. Activity-based costing provides a vehicle for assigning
these costs to the appropriate products.
Second, the costs associated with the batch-level activity (machine setups)
have also been assigned to the specific products to which they relate. These
costs have been assigned according to the number of setups completed for
each product. However, since a batch-level activity is involved, another
factor affecting unit costs comes into play. That factor is batch size. Some
products are produced in large batches and some are produced in small
11-13
Chapter 11 Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management
batches. The smaller the batch, the higher the cost per unit of the batch
activity. In the case at hand, the data can be analyzed as shown below.
Model HY5:
Cost to complete one setup [see 2(a)]....................................... P720 (a)
Number of units processed per setup
(20,000 units ÷ 150 setups)...................................................133.33 (b)
Setup cost per unit (a) ÷ (b)...................................................... P5.40
Model AS2:
Cost to complete one setup (above).......................................... P720 (a)
Number of units processed per setup
(40,000 units ÷ 100 setups)................................................... 400 (b)
Setup cost per unit (a) ÷ (b)...................................................... P1.80
Thus, the cost per unit for setups is three times as great for Model HY5, the
low-volume product, as it is for Model AS2, the high-volume product.
Such differences in cost are obscured when direct labor-hours (or any other
volume measure) is used as the basis for applying overhead cost to
products.
In sum, overhead cost has shifted from the high-volume product to the low-
volume product as a result of more appropriately assigning some costs to
the products on the basis of the activities involved, rather than on the basis
of direct labor-hours.
1. A 11. B 21. D
2. D 12. D 21. A
3. C 13. C 22. B
4. B 14. A 23. A
5. A 15. C 24. B
11-14
Systems Design: Activity-Based Costing and Management Chapter 11
6. D 16. D 25. D
7. A 17. D 26. B
8. B 18. C 27. C
9. D 19. B 28. A
10. C 20. A 29. C
11-15