Editorial: B Sury, Associate Editor

Editorial
B Sury, Associate Editor
We invite every one interested in research – especially in math-

ematics – to ponder on two of its aspects described below. One
concerns the ‘crowd-sourcing of ideas’ and the other deals with
the difficulty of proof verification.
The ‘Polymath Collaborative Project’ may not be well known
among non-mathematicians. Here is what it is about. The British
Email:
mathematician Timothy Gowers conducted a social experiment
surybang@gmail.com
in January 2009 through his blog. He selected an important un-
solved problem in mathematics and invited others to contribute to
the solution. Gowers also raised the pertinent question: “Is mas-
sively collaborative mathematics possible?” Thus began the Poly-
math Project. The first problem proposed to find a combinatorial
proof of the density Hales–Jewett theorem. This theorem can be
informally described as saying that the n-in-a-row generalization
of the tic-tac-toe game featuring several players cannot end in
a draw, irrespective of which player plays each turn, provided
the board is of sufficiently large dimension. This first Polymath
Project and a few others that got completed were published under
the interesting pseudonym of D H J Polymath. Many Polymath
Projects started with a level of participation comparable to that of
the first one, but some of them eventually got stalled, seemingly
due to unsurmountable obstacles, and the level of participation
fell below a critical number. Till date, 16 Polymath Projects have
been proposed, 5 have been completed successfully, and one other
– though in limbo – has contributed to the resolution of a different
problem.
We point out that Polymath Project 14 has an Indian connec-
tion. The project arose accidentally from a question raised by
Apoorva Khare at the end of 2017. Following that, there was furi-
ous activity and the project has just been completed with inputs
from 14 people. The final resolution is expected to appear as a
RESONANCE | July 2018 723

EDITORIAL
publication by D H J Polymath, and 6 people including Apoorva

Khare and Siddharth Gadgil of the Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore would be the ‘authors’ if this were a traditional pub-
lication. It seems unlikely that a difficult question of the kind
treated here would have been answered so quickly without the
sustained and combined interest of several experts. I should like
to believe that this method of research is here to stay, and in the
future, majority of big questions in mathematics will be dealt with
in this fashion.
We mention now a completely different aspect of mathematical
research that originated with the mathematician Vladimir Voevod-
sky in a sense. Voevodsky, who passed away in September 2017
at the age of 51 was a very gifted mathematician at the Institute
of Advanced Study, Princeton. He had won the Fields Medal
in 2002 for the resolution of the Milnor and Bloch–Kato conjec-
tures. His work completely revolutionized the subject and created
a new area called the ‘motivic homotopy theory’. Much earlier,
in 1990, Voevodsky and Mikhail Kapranov had written a famous
paper, and later a mistake was found in the proof of a key lemma
of this paper. In fact, the main result of that paper on infinite
groupoids was itself found not to be true. More and more ex-
amples of mathematical errors in the works of mathematicians
became a matter of consuming concern for Voevodsky. He asked
in a public lecture: “Who would ensure that I did not forget some-
thing and did not make a mistake, if even the mistakes in much
more simple arguments take years to uncover?” As mathemati-
cal proofs had become so complicated, the details were seldom
checked completely. On top of this, a very high reputation of
the author only compounds this problem because every one as-
sumes that the proofs must be right. Voevodsky’s perception was
that the foundations of mathematics based on set theory were far
removed from the way mathematicians actually worked. There-
after, he started essentially rewriting the foundations of mathe-
matics. He started thinking of computer representation of math-
ematical proofs and created a theory named the ‘univalent foun-
dations’. It provides the foundation for a mathematics repository
724 RESONANCE | July 2018

EDITORIAL
and is (potentially) an alternative to set theory as the foundation

for all of mathematics. This would help mathematicians to ver-
ify and share each other’s work even if their approaches to the
underlying concepts were different.
The July issue of Resonance features Alan Baker, a British math-
ematician who won the Fields Medal at the age of 31 for his path-
breaking work on transcendental number theory. Even though
this is a highly technical subject, the article by Yann Bugeaud,
one of the present-day experts in this area, describes in reasonably
elementary terms, some of Baker’s seminal work. Another article
on transcendence by Senthil Kumar, R Thangadurai and Veekesh
Kumar launches itself from a fascinating elementary problem that
appeared in the Putnam Undergraduate Mathematics Competi-
tion. The problem asks for a proof that a real number c for which
the c-th power of every positive integer is a positive integer, must
itself be a non-negative integer.
In a gripping article, Anantha Ramakrishna and Arun Jayannavar
provide an approach to answering the fundamental question as
to how much time a quantum particle or wave spends in a given
region. The series of illuminating classroom articles on fluid dy-
namics by Chirag Kalelkar has reached its 15th episode and talks
about fluid instabilities. Sneha Titus reviews Sheshagiri Rao’s
book A Gentle Man Who Taught Infinity which recounts in fasci-
nating detail the influence his school mathematics teacher Chan-
nakeshava had on him, while D Balasubramanian reviews Indian
Science: Transforming India – A look back on its 70-year jour-
ney; impact of science in independent India, recently published
by the Indian National Science Academy. Finally, a three-part
masterly description of breakthroughs in information and com-
munication technologies has been sketched by V Rajaraman, and
the first part appears in this issue.
RESONANCE | July 2018 725

Editorial: B Sury, Associate Editor

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Editorial: B Sury, Associate Editor

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Editorial: B Sury, Associate Editor

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Editorial

B Sury, Associate Editor

We invite every one interested in research – especially in math-

RESONANCE | July 2018 723

publication by D H J Polymath, and 6 people including Apoorva

724 RESONANCE | July 2018

and is (potentially) an alternative to set theory as the foundation

RESONANCE | July 2018 725

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.