Literacy Across Curriculum
Literacy Across Curriculum
embeds a grasp of how different language choices and patterns represent and document
ideas and views of the world through a range of genres
develops a sense of the way disciplinary knowledge is organised (for example, in science,
history or geography).
Each subject or discipline, such as Science or History, has its own distinctive literacy demands
(Christie & Derewianka, 2008). The Toolkit promotes an informed understanding of texts
common to various disciplines, including English, which contributes to teachers’ capacity to
support children’s interpretation and composition of a variety of print based and multimodal
texts (Myhill, Jones & Watson, 2013).
Curriculum require students to have literacy skills which enable them to interpret and compose
texts across different disciplines. This involves teaching about how different language choices
and patterns represent and document ideas and views of the world through a range of genres. It
requires developing a sense of the way disciplinary knowledge is organized, for example in
science or history or geography.
Theory to Practice
Christie and Derewianka (2008) examine the reading and writing demands of the subject areas
English, Science and History. Their detailed account documents the varying texts and
grammatical choices which shape and establish disciplinary knowledge in these subjects. Across
the years of primary schooling Christie and Derewianka (2008) note a shift across from simple
common-sense knowledge to more elaborated and expanded forms of language which expresses
increasingly more ‘uncommon-sense’ knowledge as students transition into secondary school.
Similarly, Humphrey (2017) outlines differences between genres and ways in which language is
used in everyday and academic domains. For example, she notes instructions, observation,
description and personal recount as genres within the everyday domain, while procedure, report
and historical recount feature in the academic domain. Like Christie and Derewianka, Humphrey
notes the shift from ‘non-technical ideas’ in the everyday domain to ‘ideas of academic
disciplines’ (2017, p. 11).
For example, ‘talking science’ in early primary requires students to ‘identify and describe
examples of the external features and basic needs of living things’ (VCAA, Science F-10). At
Levels 3 and 4 in History students ‘explain how and why life changed in the past, and identify
aspects of the past that remained the same’ (VCAA, History F-10), while by the end of Level 6
in Geography, students ‘identify and describe locations including the major countries of Europe,
North America and Asia’ (VCAA, Geography F-10). What is clear here is that literacy teaching
needs to be part of all subjects taught in primary schools and secondary schools.
Common-sense language
Technical language
Technical language is expert knowledge that goes beyond observable experience. Technical
terms are the direct result of the kinds of knowledge scientists, geographers and other specialists
are involved in developing as they study, classify and reclassify the world into taxonomies.
Literacy development in the middle years draws heavily on increasingly technical language. The
vocabulary that is needed can either be technical or specialized. Understanding these terms is
crucial to students developing competence in comprehension.
How would you group the following: an apple, a pear and a pumpkin?
References
Christie, F. & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of
schooling. London: Continuum.
Humphrey, S. (2017). Academic literacies in the Middle Years: A framework for enhancing
teacher knowledge and student achievement. New York and London: Routledge.
Back to top