BUDDHISM AND GAY CULTURE

The title of this talk was meant to be a little bit provocative, not the “Buddhism” part, but the
“Gay Culture” part. From a Buddhist standpoint, the sexual landscape of this day and age
seems very strange. Just about everybody in our culture is extremely concerned about sex, and
not necessarily in a healthy way. This gives rise to several sub-groups that we can think of as
“sexual cultures,” all having to do with how certain groups of people think that sex should be
viewed and how it should be conducted.

In no particular order, our various sexual cultures think that sex is:
• Great.

• Depraved and sinful.

• An expression of love.

• An expression of passion.

• Only for making babies.

• The end result of a successful date.

• Something to be bought and sold.

• Not something we should talk about.

• Something we should always talk about.

• The downfall of society as we know it.

• God’s gift to humanity.

• God’s curse on humanity.

• A path to enlightenment

• A path to hell.

• Only to be practiced between women and men.

• To be practiced between consenting adults of any gender.

Is it any wonder that this culture is so neurotic when it comes to sex? We have these many
different sexual cultures all bumping into each other, members of most of them claiming that
only its view is the right view of sex. And so, because some sexual cultures are so angry that a
particular kind of sex goes against their view of sex, there exists “gay culture,” which for
purposes of our discussion includes female homosexuals, male homosexuals, transgendered
people and bisexual people.
To me as a practicing Buddhist, it seems a little bit sad that we have to think of a particular
group of people as having their own sexual culture. Some people I know in the LGBT
community tell me that because of social pressure, which often takes the form of outright
nastiness, prejudice and hatred against them, they’ve had to band together for purposes of
mutual support, thus creating a “culture.” These people tell me that the only agenda they have
is to live a happy life; instead, they get marginalized, stereotyped, hated on and so forth, and
this makes it very difficult form them to live a happy life, particularly when so many of the
people who act so hatefully toward them are using religion to try to beat them into submission.
My purpose in presenting this talk is to explain how the Buddhist tradition views
homosexuality so that people of all genders, sexual preferences, religions and so on know
exactly where we are on this topic.

Over 2500 years ago in northern India, a man woke up to Universal Truth. We call this
awakened being the Buddha, and when he woke up one of the first things he said was, “How
marvelous! All beings are endowed with wisdom and virtue!” So from the very first the
Buddha said that all living beings are fundamentally complete, that anyone can become
awakened to Universal Truth. There were no strings attached...all beings could wake up.

The Buddha taught that the cause of all our problems is that we desire, we crave, and this feeds
the basic illusion that we’re somehow a completely discrete, separate being, when in fact we
are all part of an interconnected whole. We have great attachments to what we mistakenly see
as “externals,” and it’s the pursuit of these so-called externals that prolongs our suffering. The
Buddha’s path is designed to free us from desire and attachment so that we actualize our true
nature and so stop the cycle of suffering that has plagued us for innumerable lifetimes. We call
that Nirvana.

The Buddha founded a community that we know as the Sangha, a community of those who left
their homes to follow the Buddha’s way. This term is still used in Buddhism to denote any
community of Buddhist practitioners. The original Sangha was divided into a woman’s
Sangha and a men’s Sangha, and because the sexual drive in human beings is so strong, the
members of both Sanghas were expected to be celibate. This was so the sexual urge would not
interfere with the quest for enlightenment.
The original Sangha had rules of conduct which developed over time, including the rule about
celibacy. Among the proscribed behaviors was homosexuality, but it was included simply
because homosexuality was a kind of sexual behavior, not because it was inherently wrong.

There was a rule that said that a particular person known as a pandaka could not be ordained.
Pandakas were homosexual males; however the problem with pandakas was not their sexual
orientation but rather their flamboyance. Pandakas were people who were flamboyant about
their sexuality to the point that they would engage in very heavy flirting. This kind of behavior
was not conducive to the serene practice of getting beyond one’s desires, so they were barred
from becoming members of the Sangha.

As far as the prevailing Indian culture of the Buddha’s time was concerned, he was a bit of a
radical. He actually said that women could become enlightened without having to wait around
to be reborn as a man, which was the prevailing wisdom of the day. In a text we know as the
Kalama Sutra, he said that tradition, scriptural authority, divine revelation and one’s own point
of view were not sufficient to determine what is right and what is wrong. That really went
against the prevailing wisdom of the day!

The Buddha said that there were three factors that should be taken into account when it comes
to making moral judgments:

1. Is the way we act toward others the way we would wish others to act toward us?
2. Do our deeds cause suffering or do our deeds prevent suffering and lead to happiness?
3. Do our deeds cause us to get closer to our personal goal of transcending suffering and
attaining Nirvana?

These three factors were the basis of what Buddhist call the Three Pure Precepts, which are the
basis of all Buddhist vows:

1. To cease to do that which causes suffering.

The original Buddhist rules of conduct, which are known as the Vinaya, listed a number of
sexual activities that were prohibited to nuns and monks:
• Adultery.
• Promiscuity.
• Sexual assault.
• Child molestation.
• Sex with anyone who is considered not to be of age.
• Having sex with someone who is helpless or in captivity.
• Sexual harassment.
• Bestiality.
• Masturbation.

As far as laypeople were concerned, the Buddhist view on sex was that it is permitted:
1. Where there’s mutual consent.
2. When it causes no harm.
3. When it does not involve breaking one’s commitment to another.
4. When it is engaged in with affection and respect and for mutual satisfaction.

You’ll notice that there are some things that we find in other traditions and cultures that are
missing in the Buddhist view:

• There’s no distinction made between homosexual and heterosexual sex.

There are several interesting stories and legends in early Buddhist literature having to do with
homosexuals. One such is the story of Soreyya, a homosexual man who is said to have
attained Arhatship, a state of enlightenment that allows one to realize Nirvana. This was the
highest attainment to which one could aspire in the early Sangha. The Buddha’s cousin
Ananda, who was his personal attendant, is said to have been a homosexual man for hundreds
of existences. He eventually became an Arhat too.

The legend of Vakkali points out that homosexual males can become enlightened not by
renouncing their sexuality, but by renouncing their desire, just as anyone else can. Vakkali was
a man who was attracted to the Buddha’s teachings because he was attracted to the Buddha’s
physical form. The Buddha was an extremely handsome man who had skin that was so
coppery in tone that it appeared to some to be golden. As the story goes, after Vakkali joined
the Sangha he spent most of his time following the Buddha around just so he could gaze upon
his physical body, instead of doing those things that other monks did. One day, as Vakkali was
ogling the Buddha, the Buddha asked him why he was so enthralled with what he called “this
stinking, rotten body,” referring to its impermanence. He told Vakkali that seeing the Dharma,
or the truth of existence, is seeing the Buddha, and vice-versa, then commanded Vakkali to
leave. Vakkali was so broken up by this order that he tried to kill himself, but the Buddha
intervened, taught him more about the nature of the Dharma, and Vakkali immediately became
liberated.

It’s useful at this point to delve a little bit into the Buddhist teaching of karma to further
understand Buddhism’s view of homosexuality. Karma means “cause and effect.” All things
we can perceive (and many we cannot) arise from a variety of causes based on the conditions
which are present. When we talk about karma in the personal sense, those things which
happen to us as individuals, we say that what causes us to create karma in this and other
lifetimes is volitional action.

A volitional action is an action that comes from having a sense that one is a discrete self, in
simpler terms, a deed which we mean to do. So it is intention based on a mistaken sense of a
discrete self which leads to volitional actions, which in turn create karma. In Buddhism we say
that we create karma through our words, deeds and thoughts. In the case of things which
happen to us, we say that the karma we have created before the event itself has met the proper
condition for its flowering, and so we experience the effects of that karma. This is the
Buddhist explanation of why bad things happen to good people, why good things happen to
bad people, why good things happen to good people and why bad things happen to bad people.

Karma is also part of the equation when it comes to preferences. Over a span of lifetimes we
develop extremely complex patterns of thought which manifest themselves in each succeeding
lifetime. We call this habituated thought. If we have a particular sexual attraction to women or
men, it is in large part because we have had these attractions before. Considering the nature of
karma, rebirth and the interconnectedness of life it is safe to say that we’ve all been women
and men. So it is logical from the standpoint of karma that our physical attraction to one
gender or the other, which is ultimately a function of the mind, has been conditioned by our
actions in many previous lifetimes.
Here’s something which may sound a bit controversial: Buddhism would say that
homosexuality is one’s natural condition and has something to do with conscious choice. The
combination of conscious choices, the ingrained desires that these choices help to create, and
traumatic events that contributed to our sexual preferences in many previous lives have now
resulted in the birth of a person who possesses the aggregate of those preferences. And since
that aggregate of sexual desire tends to favor one gender more often than not, this person too
will tend to favor one gender. However, the prevailing Buddhist view is that an individual
arrives in this lifetime with much of that preference already intact regardless of what gender
form that individual may take. We may decide that we like women or men, but our underlying
preferences, which are the result of our accumulated karma, are what point us in that direction.
Buddhist thought does not say that our sexual preference is either good or bad, simply that it is
directly related to cause and effect. The bottom line is that from the Buddhist perspective, it’s
not who you’ve been in previous existences but who you are now that is most important.

At this point I think it’s helpful to look briefly at how Buddhism developed over time and how
the Buddhist view of sexuality developed along with it. After several hundred years of close
examination of the Buddha’s teachings, there arose a kind of Buddhism that became known as
the “Mahayana” or “Greater Vehicle.” One of the main characteristics of the Mahayana was
that it put laypeople on a par with monastics as far as the attainment of enlightenment was
concerned: everyone could become enlightened, you didn’t necessarily have to leave home and
become a monk.

Some of the Mahayana teachings which had a bearing on Buddhist sexual attitudes included:
• The teaching of Emptiness, that all phenomena are interconnected; nothing exists as a

totally discrete entity, apart from anything else.

fully enlightened Buddha.

ordinary behavior.
• That compassion and wisdom together comprise enlightened behavior.

As in the earlier days of the Buddhist tradition, none of these teachings made any mention of
homosexuality or heterosexuality as being better or worse than the other. The teaching of
Buddha-Nature meant that regardless of sexual preference all sentient beings deserve our
respect, for their essential nature is Buddhahood itself. The teachings of Emptiness,
compassion and wisdom meant that all beings have their own uniqueness and yet are part of a
universally interconnected whole, so we recognize those who are different from us as being
part of our own self as well and treat them accordingly, assisting them along the path to
enlightenment.

For Mahayana Buddhists, just as with the early Buddhists (with the exception of some celibate
communities), the underlying attitude about sex was concerned with not doing that which
causes harm. Not engaging in sexual misconduct meant treating sex with respect and
compassion, regardless of whether that sex was homosexual or heterosexual. It meant that in
sexual relations one should be compassionate but not passionate in the sense of surrendering to
base desires, since desire is a hindrance to enlightenment. People were asked to remember that
there’s no difference between sex and Buddha-Nature itself if that sex is mutually fulfilling and
not egoistic.

Respect and tolerance have been the Buddhist ideal when it comes to peoples’ sexual
preferences, and they remain the ideal today. But of course, there have been numerous
instances where Buddhists have demonstrated intolerance toward people who have a same-sex
orientation. The thing to remember about the Buddhist tradition is that throughout its history it
has taken on many of the characteristics of the cultures through which it has passed, and in
more than a few of those cultures there has been an attitude of intolerance toward
homosexuality present, just as there is be in the modern west.

One of the reasons for this kind of homophobia in predominantly Buddhist countries such as
contemporary Thailand has to do with misogyny and the overwhelming desire for descendents
in much of Asian culture. Misogyny, as you know, often manifests itself as a nearly
pathological fear of anything which even hints at having feminine traits. To many people
homosexual males seem overly feminine, and so they are hated or feared or both. In many
Asian cultures the continuation of one’s bloodline is of paramount importance, so sexual
unions which cannot produce children may be seen as perverted since they don’t produce
children.

In some areas of Asia, karma is being dismissed as a contributing cause of one’s sexual
preferences. This phenomenon is seen not as a challenge to the Buddhist teachings about
karma, but as the advancement of an anti-homosexual agenda by the undermining of these
teachings. Just a couple of years ago, a very eminent Thai Buddhist monk called for the
expulsion of homosexual monks, saying that those who have such “sexual deviations” should
not even be allowed to become monks in the first place. Fortunately there were a number of
other Thai monks who challenged that view (you see, our tradition can get hijacked too!).

In one of the more famous incidents, the Dalai Lama, who’s the head of the Tibetan
government in exile and probably the world’s most well-known Buddhist, wrote in one of his
many books that “homosexuality, whether it is between men or between women, is not
improper in itself. What is improper is the use of organs already defined as inappropriate for
sexual contact,” referring to oral, anal and manual sex. After representatives of the LGBT
community demanded a meeting with him, the Dalai Lama did admit that some of these views
might have more to do with cultural factors than with Buddhism. His representatives have
repeatedly said that the Dalai Lama is against violence and discrimination based on sexual
orientation, and that he supports tolerance, compassion and human rights.

I was surfing the internet recently and I stumbled upon a Google entry that said, “Zen and the
Origins of Homosexuality.” When I clicked onto the page I was greeted with the
pronouncement that, “No matter what your psychologist or psychiatrist tells you,
homosexuality can be cured!” It gets better: “Don’t go into orbit! Homosexuality is not a
disease. What I mean by ‘cured’ is, your homosexuality will be removed automatically and
without your actually doing anything to change your sexuality except buying and reading Zen
and the Origins of Homosexuality and following the easy, simple instructions. I guarantee it!
How can I guarantee it? Because I invented the method and used it on myself!” The ensuing
explanation sounded like a mish-mash of dream analysis, Scientology, Kaballah and anything
else this fellow had lying around his library. So now people are even hijacking Zen, which is
rooted in a tradition which encourages tolerance and respect for all beings, homosexuals and
heterosexuals alike.

As I said at the beginning, the title of this lecture, “Buddhism and Gay Culture” (which the
Plain Dealer saw fit not to include in its announcement), is a little bit provocative. I hope it
was the kind of provocative that provokes us to think. It’s a shame that many people who have
same-sex preferences have even had to develop a so-called “gay culture” because of rampant
prejudice, hatred and ignorance. This sort of unkindness is seen by the Buddhist tradition as
being very deluded, the kind of behavior that is rooted in what we call the Three Poisons of
craving, anger and ignorance...the kind of behavior that causes eons worth of needless
suffering for its victims and for its perpetrators….the kind of behavior that takes faith
traditions that are based on kindness and love and turns them into weapons that are used to
beat anyone who does not comply into submission. Forget “God culture,” “Gay culture” or
any of the so-called subcultures that we keep creating. It’s time to emphasize human culture.

I’ll never forget seeing the picture of the fellow from the Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka,
Kansas who was standing out near the I-X center during the recent memorial service for the
local Marines who were killed in Iraq. The sign he held said, “God Hates Fags.” What a
shame, I thought; this person doesn’t even know that he’s suffering. This man is living in
extreme ignorance and hatred, and he even believes that his own deity, his own divine being
that he reveres and worships, is so hateful that he kills soldiers whose country upholds the
rights of gay people. But as a Buddhist I cannot hate this man. All I can do is to see what
causes this kind of behavior, to have compassion for this man as a suffering being, and to do
what I can to negate the suffering that his actions are creating for himself and for others.

One of the main reasons for this lecture is to reach out to the community of Lesbians, Gays,
Bisexuals and Transgendered persons and to let them know that the Buddhist tradition harbors
them no ill will in any way...that we see each living being as being an enlightened Buddha-in-
the making and that we respect them as such...and to let them know that they are welcome to
study the teachings and practices of the Buddhist tradition here, regardless of what faith they
might follow, to help them live a peaceful, productive and enlightened life.

In closing, I would ask you all to place your palms together and listen to a Buddhist prayer that
we call The Four Immeasurables. As we listen to this short prayer, let us extend these wishes
to all sentient beings, regardless of how they may feel about us or how we may feel about
them.

May all beings have true happiness.