ACC702 - Week 7 Tutorial SOLUTIONS CH 13 ROI EVA
ACC702 - Week 7 Tutorial SOLUTIONS CH 13 ROI EVA
Discussion questions:
13.4 Outline some of the steps that can be taken to minimise the negative behavioural effects of Return
on Investment (ROI).
There are several ways to minimise the negative behavioural effects of ROI:
• Use a broader set of performance measures which encompass both long-term and short-term measures, and
financial and non-financial measures. This de-emphasises ROI as a performance measure.
• Consider alternative ways of measuring invested capital so that the replacement of an asset does not have
such an adverse effect on ROI. Use of market values or acquisition cost can help here.
• Use alternate profit measures, such as residual income, to minimise some of the investment disincentives
associated with ROI.
13.5 Provide two examples of situations where the use of ROI can lead to decisions which may harm the
further competiveness of a company. (Even though the current ROI is at or above budgeted levels.)
Overemphasising ROI can led to decisions that may be harmful to the future competitiveness of a company. Some
examples follow:
Managers of an investment centre may defer research and development expenditure to improve short-term profit
and hence enhance short-term ROI. However, the lack of R&D may reduce the number of new products under
development that are needed to remain competitive.
Managers may defer investment in new manufacturing plant to reduce depreciation, increase profit, decrease
investment and hence increase short-term ROI. This may reduce the future capacity of the company to produce
innovative products and may lead to inefficient and costly operations.
13.8 Does it matter how invested capital and profit are defined for the purpose of the ROI calculations?
Explain your answer. (Write a paragraph to answer this question.)
In an organisation that has divisions, invested capital and profit must be consistently defined when used in ROI
calculations. However, the advantages and disadvantages of particular definitions must also be considered. For
example, using net book values rather than market values may have certain behavioural consequences. The
investment base used in the ROI calculation should normally include only those assets and liabilities that are
attributable to the division, or controllable by the divisional manager. Similarly, the profit measure should be
either attributable or controllable profit for that division. The ROI used must be capable of measuring the relative
performance of divisions (or managers), or performance of a division (or manager) over time (hence the need for
consistency), and be as ‘valid’ a measure of performance as possible.
Extra Q – What is significant about the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) used to calculate the
‘capital charge’ in the EVA measurement?
The WACC represents the cost to the company to obtain funds in the market from both equity (share)
holders and debt holders AT CURRENT MARKET RATES. It requires the managers to consider if their
returns are sufficient to justify the performance in current market conditions.
2 Calculate each division’s Economic Value Add (EVA) under each of the following assumptions about
the firm’s WACC. (Assume the profit shown is AFTER TAX and the Average Invested Capital (shown
above) is the Capital Employed
(a) Improve the return on sales to 10 per cent by increasing profit to $7 500 000:
ROI = return on sales investment turnover
$7 500 000 $75 000 000
= ´
$75 000 000 $30 000 000
= 10% 2.5 = 25%
Since sales revenue remains unchanged, this implies a cost reduction of $1 500 000 at the same sales
revenue.
(b) Improve the investment turnover to 3.125 by decreasing average invested capital to
$24 000 000:
ROI = return on sales investment turnover
$6 000 000 $75 000 000
= ´
$75 000 000 $24 000 000
= 8% 3.125 = 25%
Since sales revenue remains unchanged, this implies that the firm can divest itself of some productive
assets without affecting sales revenue.
Extension exercise:
1. If in the above exercise, the Weighted Average Cost of Capital for the company was 13% and tax was
30%, would the operation of Zap represent added value for the shareholders? (Note current
liabilities are $300,000 and SHOULD be deducted from Invested Capital to calculate Employed
Capital.)
EVA = NPAT – “Capital Charge”
= [PBT x (1-t)] - [(Capital Invested – Current Liabilities) x WACC)
= $6m x 0.7 - [($30 000 000 - $300 000) x 13%]
= $4.2m - $3.861m
= $0.339m
Therefore the business unit is adding an acceptable return for the shareholders as its return is
greater than the cost of capital.
profit
profit
2 ROI = 15% = =
invested capital 4 500
000
Profit = 15% 4 500 000 = 675 000
Therefore, total expenses (cost of goods sold and operating expenses) must be reduced to $8 325 000 in order
to raise the firm’s ROI to 15 per cent.
= 7.5% 2
= 15%
Pilot Corporation has established separate business units as investment centres and the manager’s
performance is measured using financial measures. Bonuses of up to one third of the manager’s
salaries are paid for achieving the targets as described below. The following is known about the
Alpha Division’s results:
If competition is high in this business then the managers will have little or no
ability to adjust selling prices without affecting sales volume therefore, the
best options are to increase profit BY DECREASING COSTS OR DECREASING the
level of INVESTED CAPITAL REQUIRED:
OR
Therefore, the manager would have to reduce the Invested Capital (by sale of
surplus assets or perhaps sale and leaseback or outsourcing and/or closing
some underperforming operations until the capital by $5.56m.
ii. Recalculate the EVA if the WACC was 15%, would the performance of the
Alpha Division be acceptable or unacceptable, why, or why not?
Using the same numbers from (i) above and recalculating EVA using 15%
WACC: