Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 36 views

    Conclusion and References

    Uploaded by

    Naveen Kumar P
    This paper proposes an MPPT P&O-CPG method to control solar panels under two conditions: MPPT operation and CPG operation to avoid overvoltage on the load. Simulation results show that the MPPT mode operates when load requirements are greater than or equal to solar power output and voltage is below 48V, while CPG mode operates when solar power output is greater than load requirements and voltage is above 48V. The MPPT P&O-CPG method is proven to avoid excess voltage with a control error of ±5% of the rated voltage, though there is still overshoot during mode switching due to irradiance fluctuations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Conclusion and References

    Uploaded by

    Naveen Kumar P
    36 views3 pages
    This paper proposes an MPPT P&O-CPG method to control solar panels under two conditions: MPPT operation and CPG operation to avoid overvoltage on the load. Simulation results show that the MPPT mode operates when load requirements are greater than or equal to solar power output and voltage is below 48V, while CPG mode operates when solar power output is greater than load requirements and voltage is above 48V. The MPPT P&O-CPG method is proven to avoid excess voltage with a control error of ±5% of the rated voltage, though there is still overshoot during mode switching due to irradiance fluctuations.

    Original Title

    CONCLUSION

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This paper proposes an MPPT P&O-CPG method to control solar panels under two conditions: MPPT operation and CPG operation to avoid overvoltage on the load. Simulation results show that the MPPT mode operates when load requirements are greater than or equal to solar power output and voltage is below 48V, while CPG mode operates when solar power output is greater than load requirements and voltage is above 48V. The MPPT P&O-CPG method is proven to avoid excess voltage with a control error of ±5% of the rated voltage, though there is still overshoot during mode switching due to irradiance fluctuations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    36 views3 pages

    Conclusion and References

    Uploaded by

    Naveen Kumar P
    This paper proposes an MPPT P&O-CPG method to control solar panels under two conditions: MPPT operation and CPG operation to avoid overvoltage on the load. Simulation results show that the MPPT mode operates when load requirements are greater than or equal to solar power output and voltage is below 48V, while CPG mode operates when solar power output is greater than load requirements and voltage is above 48V. The MPPT P&O-CPG method is proven to avoid excess voltage with a control error of ±5% of the rated voltage, though there is still overshoot during mode switching due to irradiance fluctuations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    CONCLUSION AND REFERENCES

    CONCLUSION
    In this paper, we propose the MPPT P&O-CPG method to be able to control
    solar panels that work on 2 conditions i.e. in MPPT operations and CPG operations
    to avoid overvoltage on the load. This MPPT P&O-CPG method has been evaluated
    through a PSIM simulation. Simulated results indicate that the MPPT mode is
    identified when the load requirements are greater or equal to the solar power panel
    (PPV < = Pref) and the voltage on the output side of the < 48V. While CPG mode is
    identified when the power requirements of the solar panel are greater than the load
    power (PPV > Pref) and the voltage at > 48V output. The performance of the MPPT
    P&O-CPG method is proven to avoid excess voltage with a control error limit of ±
    5% of the rating voltage on the load although it is still overshot during mode
    switching due to irradiance fluctuations.

    REFERENCES

    [1] M. Hassani, S. Mekhilef, A. Patrick Hu, and N. R. Watson, "A novel MPPT

    algorithm for load protection based on output sensing control," IEEE Ninth

    International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS), pp.

    1120-1124, 2011.

    [2] T. Esram, and P. L. Chapman, "Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum

    power point tracking techniques," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol.

    22, no. 2, pp. 439-449, June 2007.

    [3] D. Beriber, and A. Talha, "MPPT techniques for PV systems," 4th International

    Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives, pp. 1437-1442,

    2013.

    [4] N. Moubayed, A. El-Ali, and R. Outbib, “Comparison of two MPPT techniques

    for PV system,” WSEAS Trans Environ Dev, 2009.

    [5] E. Prasetyono, D. O. Anggriawan, A. Z. Firmansyah, and N. A. Windarko, "A

    modified MPPT algorithm using incremental conductance for constant power

    generation of photovoltaic systems," Engineering Technology and Applications

    (IES-ETA) International Electronics Symposium on, pp. 1-6, 2017.

    Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Page 57


    CONCLUSION AND REFERENCES

    [6] A. Gaga, F. Errahimi, and N. Es-Sbai, "Design and implementation of MPPT

    solar system based on the enhanced P&O algorithm using labview,"

    International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC), pp. 203-

    208, 2014.

    [7] N. Femia, G. Petrone, G. Spagnuolo, and M. Vitelli, "Optimization of perturb

    and observe maximum power point tracking method," IEEE Transactions on

    Power Electronics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 963-973, July 2005.

    [8] Y. Yang, F. Blaabjerg, and H. Wang, "Constant power generation of

    photovoltaic systems considering the distributed grid capacity," IEEE Applied

    Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), pp. 379- 385, 2014.

    [9] A. Sangwongwanich, Y. Yang, and F. Blaabjerg, “High-performance constant

    power generation in grid-connected PV systems,” IEEE Transactions On Power

    Electronics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp 1822- 1825, March 2016.

    [10] T. Bhavin, B. Patel, J. Desai, and K. Sonwane, "Analysis of SEPIC converter,"

    International Journal of Engineering Development and Research (IJEDR), vol.

    6, issue 2, 2018.

    [11] H. Suryoatmojo, R. M. Hakim, D. C. Riawan, R. Mardiyanto, S. Anam, E.

    Setijadi, and M. Ashari, "MPPT Based on Modified Incremental Conductance

    Algorithm for Solar Powered UAV," International Seminar on Intelligent

    Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA), pp. 108-113, 2019.

    [12] Soedibyo, S. Anam, I. Hafidz, G. R. Zulkarnain, and M. Ashari, “MPPT design

    on solar farm using perturb and observe technique considering tilt angle and

    partial shading in giligenting island,” International Seminar on Intelligent

    Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA), pp. 222-226, 2017.

    Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Page 57


    CONCLUSION AND REFERENCES

    [13] Q. A. Sias and I. Robandi, "Recurrence Perturb and Observe algorithm for

    MPPT optimization under shaded condition," International Seminar Intelligent

    Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA), pp. 533-538, 2016.

    Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Page 57

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy