Almora, Et Al. vs. Dela Rosa, Et Al. (2019)
Almora, Et Al. vs. Dela Rosa, Et Al. (2019)
Almora, Et Al. vs. Dela Rosa, Et Al. (2019)
• - ·-
s~~ar ms.- -- .· r··•
-'I'·
+
tJ ....
. 1:~t.·.;1,�1 '
1
3Republic of
31\epublic of tbe ~bilipp :ines
tle 3bilippines
Supreme
~upreme QJ:ourt
Court
it
Baguio «:itp
;inguio
ENBANC
EN BANC
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames:
x--------------------------------------------------�
x--------------------------------------------------~
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION·
In the Resolution dated 14 August 2018, this Court resolved to: (l)
( l)
grant the Letter dated 25 July 2018 of Atty. Jose Manuel I. Diokno,
Chairperson, Free Legal Assistance Group, and counsel for petitioners in
G.R. No. 234359, requesting copies of Annexes 11 to 57 attached to the (i)
Compliance dated 26 April 2018 and (ii) Compliance dated 25 June 2018
(0SG); and (2) require the OSG
filed by the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG);
to furnish Atty. Diokno with the aforesaid Annexes 1I to 57 and to submit
proof of such compliance within five days from notice.
JJ
2016 to 30 November
b. list of deaths under investigation from l1 July .2016
2017;
c. list of Chinese and Fil-Chinese drug lords
iords who have been neutralized;
Notice ot Kesolut1on --2-
2- G.R. Nos. 234359 & 234484
April 2, 2019
Pursuant to its own classification, the OSG decided to send only the
documents under Category 2, attached as Annexes 2 to 30-m 3 0-m and 34, to
Dano, et al. The OSG claimed that
petitioners in Almora, et al., and in Da:fio,
petitioners are not entitled to the production of Category I1 documents,
because these documents are irrelevant to the issues involved in the instant
petition for a writ of Amparo or to the petition for prohibition. The OSG
further claimed that the Category 11 documents contain very sensitive
information with law enforcement and national security implications. Also,
these documents do not directly relate to the constitutional issue in the
present petition for prohibition, and are not pertinent to the alleged violation
of the rights of the victims in Almora, which is the subject of the present
petition for a writ of Amparo.
9. To obviate any further controversy on this matter, the OSG will furnish
the Daiio petitioners with all Category 2 documents given to the Almora
petitioners, which documents will be attached to the instant Comment.
When the OSG submitted its Compliance dated 26 April 2018 and
Compliance dated 25 June 2018, it did not make any reservation that certain
documents covered by its Compliance would be withheld from petitioners.
"1
Annex "1" Letter dated April 12, 2018 from PDG Ronald M. Dela
Rosa requesting the Office of the Solicitor General
allow
(OSG) to take appropriate action for the SC to alJow
them more time to comply with the directives.
O
J
2 - Case folder relating to the death of Ryan Dave Tuazon
Annexes "2"
2-1
"2-i" Almora.
Almora. /
Annexes "7" - Case folder relating to the death of Ryan Eder y Supnet.
«1-nn"
"7-nn"
·8 -. Case folder relating to the death of Willie Temora.
Annexes "8"
Apnexes Ternora.
·8-nn"
"8-nn"
Annexes "11"
11 Case folder relating to the death of Jerry Estreller y De
"ll-1"
--"11-1 Belen.
Annexes "15"
"15 Case folder relating to the deaths of Leo Geluz y
- "15-z"
''15-z" Merced, Joshua Merced y Merced and Bimbo Merced y
Siprano.
--"22-u
"22-u"
Annexes "23
''23'' Case folder relating to the death of Elmer Lagunsad y
"23-p"
--"23-p Cayubit.
31
Annex "31" Copy of Double Barrel Alpha or Command
Memorandum Circular No. 01-2017.
32'
Annex ''32" Internal Cleansing and Process Flow
Statistics on PNP Intern.al
on Handling Complaints.
33°
Annex "33" Chine.se and Filipino-Chinese covering
List of Arrested Chinese
the period of CY 2003-2017.
Annex "34"
"34 Number of buy-bust incidents in San Andres Bukid from
I, 2016 to November 30, 2017.
July 1,
"35"
Annex ''35" Manila.3
Drug watch lists in Sta. Ana, Manila.
36
Annex "36" Summary of Administrative Cases of All RIAS Offices
on Anti-Illegal Drugs
Drugs Operations (DOUBLE BARREL).
Annex "36-a''
"36-a" Summary of Administrative Cases of NIAS on Anti-
Illegal Drugs Operations (DOUBLE BARREL).
''36~d" NIAS
Annex "36-d NLAS Summary Hearing Proceedings on Anti-Illegal
Drugs Operations (July 2016 --- December 20 I 6 and
January 2017 -- December 2017)
-December
l!
3
of G.R. No. 234359 (Almora), pp. 2006 to 2097. Vol. IV ofG.R.
Vol. IV ofG.R. of G.R. No. 234484 (Dafio),
(Dano), pp.
2033 to 2123.
Ivouce 01 .Kesomuon
l"louce oI KeSOIuI1on - --
- O
() G..
U.K. Nos. 234359 & 234484
April 2, 2019
Annex 36-
"36- Summary of Administrative Cases of RIAS 8
8 on Anti-
m" Illegal Drugs Operations (DOUBLE BARREL).
"36-t
Annex "36-t" Summary of Administrative Cases of RIAS COR on
Anti-Illegal Drugs Operations (DOUBLE BARREL).
Annex "37•c"
"37-c" Resolution No. 2015-5547, Approving the Creation of
the. Anti-Illegal Drugs Group
.Police.Anti-Illegal
the Philippine National Police
as a National Operational Support Unit.
Annex "37-d"
37-d Memorandum Circular No. 2015-63, Revitalization of
Barangay Anti-Drug Abuse Council (BADAC) and
the BarangayAnti-Drug
their role in Drug Clearing Operations.
PRAYER
XX xx
xx XX
Copy furnished:
I
r'luuce esoIuuon
Ivouce or Kesomuon -~ - U.K.
G.K. Nos. 2:;4:;)9
234359 & 234484
April 2, 2019
xx xx
XXXX
1. On April 26, 2018, the OSG filed Compliance with Motion for
Extension of Time to Submit Additional Documents for sixty days from
April 26, 2018, or until June 25, 2018.
PRAYER
xx xx
xxxx
Copy furnished:
ATTYS.
A TTYS. JOSE MANUEL .I.
I. DIOKNO,
PABLITO V. SANIDAD, ARNO V.
SANIDAD and FELIX J. MARINAS,
JR.
Free Legal Assistance Group
Counsel/or
Counsel for Petitioners in GR. No. 234359
c/o Sanidad Law Office
77 Malakas Street
Brgy. Pinyahan, Quezon City 1100
xx xx
xxxx
The OSG, in its 4 September 2018 motion, did not state any basis,
either factual or legal, as to how the documents under their alleged Category
11 contain very sensitive information with law enforcement and national
security implications, and as to how the said documents do not relate to the
constitutional issue in the present petition for prohibition. The OSG merely
made a hasty conclusion that "[ "[rr ]equiring the respondents to produce the
alleged documents would amount to a premature and virtual grant of the
relief prayed for by the petitioners. By requiring the production of said
writ of amparo. "9
documents, this Honorable Court, has, in effect, issued the writ !J
8
s Resolution, pp... 50,.
R<lsolution, 50, 3 April 2018.
9
Compliance (with Motion for Partial Reconsideration), p. 5, filed by the OSG.
OsG.
I1 vUuUc
'jVU\.,C UI IUUILLIUII
VJ. 1'.C:SU1UL1U11 1L
-- 1 -
L. - \J.1"-. 1"40S
U.IX. 1NOS.• 45152 &. 254444844
..Gj4j.)~ & ..lj44~4
April 2, 2019
~
G 0. ARIC~fTA
O.ARICHETA
~f
Clerk of Court \([
°
1
to Comment (on Petitioners' Motion to Be Fumished a Copy of Respondents' Documentary
Submissions), p. 7.
11
Resolution, p. 45.
~ '