Financial Modeling Guide
Financial Modeling Guide
Financial Modeling Guide
, MBA
Part I
I remember the first model I built in 2005. It was awful: terrible design, bad
structure, calculations’ drawbacks, etc. Since that time I have made dozens of
different models. There were one-page high-level models, “normal,” and
complicated multi-scenario fully automated ones. They were used by large
corporations, start-ups, Private Equity Funds, and Investment companies. I have
learned something since 2005 and wish to share some insights into financial
modeling.
The rule of thumb is to use separate sheets for each part of your model!
1
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
The right answer – it depends on. J However, in the case of “normal” financial
model there are some tips:
2
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
3
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
Also, you should include a change in Net Working Capital to get FCFF, but I did not
include it to simplify the process.
4
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
Part II
There are no rigid rules to structure and create Financial model, except one: it
should be built in clear, unambiguous, and most efficient way. At the end of the
day, any external user of the Financial model should be able to easily understand
its structure, to find out underlying assumptions and all interconnections within a
model, and to adjust necessary input parameters. How can be this accomplished?
During my career, I have come up with several pillars of a good-designed model:
1) Units of measure. You can think this is a straightforward and obvious thing;
however, I observed situation when the promising project was rejected by
investor due to the absence of units of measure. Also, I recommend mentioning
all external sources used for Assumptions.
2) I wrote about it in the first part; still, it is worth to be repeated: no hard coded
cells within your Model. Each and every calculation should be linked through
Assumptions.
4) In case your model contains more than several sheets it is useful to implement
content tab and navigation bar. The most complex model I have ever created
included 35 sheets. You can imagine how hard it could be to navigate across all
these tabs. Therefore, I implemented a Content tab with hyperlinks to other
sheets within the model. Also, I added a hyperlink to the Content tab on each
sheet.
5
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
5) Keep the structure simple. If your project involves Debt Financing to purchase
Fixed assets, then it makes sense to add "Debt Financing" and "Fixed Asset" tabs.
6
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
Scenarios Implementation
Common Scenarios are Basic, Optimistic, and Pessimistic. What I have learned
from investors is that they often don't pay much attention to the Optimistic one.
Their primary concern is potential losses in case of something goes wrong.
Therefore, I always pay maximum attention to the Basic and Pessimistic
Scenarios.
In case Revenue Growth changes over time, you can bind Scenarios to the cell
containing percentage, and then multiply it by Revenue growth. For example,
your Basic Scenario implies 100% of predicted growth; alternatively, Pessimistic
one decreases this rate to 70%.
1) Step One: Insert "Combo Box" Form you can find under "Developer" Tab
7
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
2) Step Two: Link your Scenarios to Input Range, then select a cell to show
numerical expression of chosen Scenario
Sensitivity Analysis
There are several ways to do it. First of all, it can be done manually. Sometimes, it
is time-saving.
8
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
example illustrates it. I added scenario named "Discount rate +10%" linked to the
Discount rate cell.
Then I manually input new value of a Discount rate which is 11% under this
scenario.
9
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
10
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
The final step is to choose Resulting parameter you want to evaluate. In my case,
it was NPV.
In the end, you should get new tab containing the following table demonstrating
NPV values under different scenarios.
11
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
Having this data, you can calculate the impact of each factor. Increasing Discount
rate leads to decrease in NPV from 290.5 to 283.0 or by 2.6%. On the other hand,
Growth Rate lowering results in NPV reduction by less than 1% from 290.5 to
287.9. Consequently, Discount Rate influences NPV more then Growth Rate does.
Part III
It is the last part of Financial Modeling posts, and it is devoted to Cash Flow and
Enterprise Evaluation. There are a lot of papers, textbooks, and other materials
covering these Corporate Finance topics, so I am going to be brief. If you are
interested in exploring these issues, I would recommend this book.
At the end of the day, the purpose of Financial Model is getting some financial
results. The ultimate result of any business is cash. However, the thing is that this
stock belongs to different stakeholders. A part of it goes to suppliers and
employees, another part to debtees and shareholders. The last one is called Free-
Cash-Flow to Firm (FCFF). It is the base to calculate Enterprise Value.
What does determine Enterprise Value? The answer is simple - cash a firm will
generate. So, Enterprise Value is the sum of forecasted discounted cash flow
(FCFF) the company will produce in future. Debt can be presented as a discounted
sum of all future payments towards Lenders. Shareholders' part is the remainder
of cash a firm makes (which is called FCFE) adjusted to all payments made to
Creditors.
This concept can be shown in another way. Debt and Equity are the only sources
of a firm's capital. Consequently, company's value can be demonstrated as a sum
of market value of Debt and market value of Equity. Therefore, the formula is
EV=EqV+Debt. I remind that EV stands for the sum of discounted FCFF, EqV is the
sum of discounted FCFE, and Debt is the sum of discounted loan repayments.
12
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
FCFF vs FCFE
Free-Cash-Flow to Equity (FCFE) is simply FCFF adjusted for all payments made
towards Lenders. These payments include Interest Expense and Debt Repayment.
As Interest Expense decreases Tax Base, therefore FCFE includes Tax Shield. Tax
Shield equals Interest Expense multiplied by Tax Rate.
13
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
WACC is one of the most common ways to calculate discount rate. I am not going
to explain the whole concept, but there is one important issue related to the
14
Vladimir Baydin, Ph.D., MBA
Capital Structure. WACC is based on market value of equity and market value of
debt. In a case of a public company market value of debt and market value of
equity would be equal to book values. In a case of a privately-held firm, we
cannot be sure that book value of equity/debt equals to the market one as there
is no market value. In this situation, it is better to use industry
average Debt/Equity Ratio. Hint: this ratio along with other important metrics like
betas, risk-free rate, and risk premiums can be found here.
First of all, this model is 100% fake. I imagined a hotel's owner considering to buy
another hotel. The final purpose of modeling is to compare Enterprise Value with
and without acquiring another hotel under two scenarios: Basic one and
Pessimistic.
Model Features:
15