The Candidate: Ian Nepomniachtchi To Challenge Carlsen
The Candidate: Ian Nepomniachtchi To Challenge Carlsen
The Candidate: Ian Nepomniachtchi To Challenge Carlsen
MAY
2021
IAN NEPOMNIACHTCHI
TO CHALLENGE CARLSEN
THE CANDIDATE
CAN THE DOTA GAMER
BEAT THE NORWEGIAN
CHESS KING?
NEBOJSA
BARALIC,
CHIEF ARBITER
AT THE CANDIDATES:
THE TRIUMPH OF
CHESS AND
PROFESSIONALISM
OVER A VIRUS
PETER O'BRIEN
TRACING THE DNA OF
CHESS IN RUSSIA AND
THE SOVIET UNION
ISSN 0007-0440
02105
9 770007 044000
IMPROVE YOUR PLAY: THE CARO CANN WITH 1.E4 AND 2.C4
IMPRESSUM
Contents
BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE
Founded 1881
www.britishchessmagazine.co.uk
278
Wang Hao
Editors retires from chess:
Milan Dinic and Shaun Taulbut I can’t take the stress
Photo editor
David Llada 260 Ian Nepomniachtchi to challenge Carlsen
after winning the Candidates tournament
Prepress Specialist
The Candidate
Milica Mitic
By GM Aleksandar Colovic
Photography
FIDE/Lennart Ootes 282 How the chief arbiter, Nebojsa Baralic,
Wikipedia, Twitter saw the historic Candidates tournament
The triumph of chess and
Advertising professionalism over a virus
Stephen Lowe
285 Book Review
Enquiries
TRACING THE DNA OF CHESS IN
editor@britishchessmagazine.co.uk
RUSSIA AND THE SOVIET UNION
ISSN 0007-0440 Peter O'Brien
© The British Chess Magazine Limited
292 4NCL Online - Round seven report
Company Limited by Shares By IM Shaun Taulbut
Registered in England No 00334968
299 Openings for Amateurs
Postal correspondence: The Caro-Kann with 1.e4 and 2.c4, Part III
Albany House, 14 Shute End
By Pete Tamburro
Wokingham, Berkshire RG40 1BJ
printed magazine
save
UK Non-UK
£55 £85
12 issues per year
postage included
subscribe
Purchase or renew your subscription and have BCM delivered to your door:
On-line: visit our website www.britishchessmagazine.co.uk
Email: contact support@britishchessmagazine.co.uk, we’ll get back to you right away
By post: write to BCM at Albany House, 14 Shute End, Wokingham, Berkshire, England
RG40 1BJ with a cheque payable to British Chess Magazine Limited, your post and email
addresses (and if possible a contact phone number)
Save time, go on-line. It’s more convenient and better for the environment, why not do it
on-line. Enjoy priority support. No waiting for your turn, we are here for you 24/7. Anytime,
anywhere. If you’re on the move, read digital BCM from your handheld or other device.
Thank you for your continuing support!
BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE, the World’s Oldest Chess Journal
a bit, it is Stockfish’s second choice in and after the rook from h1 joins the game all
this position... White’s pieces will be included in the attack
while Black is heavily under-developed.
18...£xc4 19.¥d6! This is the idea: White
prevents Black from castling and threatens 22.¤dxe6
¥xc5. Vachier spent a lot of time and to XIIIIIIIIY
his credit he came up with the best defence.
9rsnl+k+r+0
19...¤f6! 9+p+-+pzp-0
XIIIIIIIIY 9p+-vLN+-zp0
9rsnl+k+-tr0 9+-sNnwQ-+-0
9+p+-+pzp-0 9-+q+-+-+0
9p+-vLpsn-zp0 9+-zP-+-+-0
9+-vl-+-+-0 9-+-+-+PzP0
9-+qsNN+-+0 9+-+RmK-+R0
9+-zP-wQ-+-0 xiiiiiiiiy
9-+-+-+PzP0 White continues in sacrificial style, but
Black can force a transposition to an
9+-+RmK-+R0 endgame, which is a huge accomplishment
xiiiiiiiiy - usually when hit with such a strong
Caruana said he was disappointed that this novelty a player fears to lose in a miniature.
move was played as he considered it both
the best one and also a difficult one to find! 22...fxe6 23.¤xe6 £xc3+ Exchanging the
queens, much to Black’s relief. He doesn’t
20.¤xc5 ¤d5 21.£e5 ¦g8 21...£xc3+?! mind losing the exchange as he correctly
This is premature as the king can move away, thought that he should have enough
connecting the rooks. 22.¢f2 £b2+ 23.¢g3 compensation for it.
Maxime Vahier Lagrave
23...¤f6 is the engine’s preference, but, This also keeps good winning chances
understandably, Vachier wanted to get the though the engine gives 31.¦e1 as stronger.
queens off the board as soon as possible. After Nevertheless, Caruana misplayed this
24.¤g5+ ¥e6 25.£xe6+ £xe6+ 26.¤xe6 promising endgame and allowed Vachier to
¢f7 27.¤c7 ¦a7 Black is a pawn up and reach a theoretically drawn position where
completely fine, according to the machine. Black had a fortress.
27.0–0+ ¢g6 28.¤xa8 ¤c6 29.¤b6 ¦d8?! It 55...¤g7! kept the fortress intact. The knight
was better to avoid the exchange of the bishop controls the h5 and f5–squares, the pawn
with 29...¥g4, but it seems Vachier thought controls the g5 and e5–squares and in case
exchanges would bring him closer to a draw. White tries to approach from the left Black
can either prevent that with his king or he can
30.¤xc8 ¦xc8 31.¥a3 rush forward to exchange White’s last pawn.
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+r+-+-+0 56.¦g3+ ¢f7 57.¢e4 ¤g8 58.¢f5 ¤e7+
59.¢f4 59.¢e4! was the correct way and
9+p+-+-zp-0 Caruana finds it later in the game. 59...¤g6
9p+n+-+kzp0 60.¦b3 ¦b7 and ¢f5 are the decisive
9+-+-+-+-0 threats. If Black tries to keep his knight on
e7, then White can break through via the
9-+-+n+-+0 kingside, for example: 60...¤e7 61.¦b7
9vL-+R+-+-0 ¢e6 62.g3! (62.g4? f5+! forces the
exchange of White’s last pawn.) 62...¢f7
9-+-+-+PzP0 63.g4 ¢e6 64.¢f3 ¢f7 65.¢g3 ¢e6
9+-+-+RmK-0 66.¢h4 when the white king will approach
xiiiiiiiiy the pawn on f6.
59...¤d5+ 60.¢g4? Caruana allows Black (68.g4? f5+ forces the exchange of
another saving chance. It was better to go White’s last pawn.) 68...¢f7 69.g4
back to the lines after 59.¢e4 by returning ¢e6 70.¢f3 ¢f7 71.¢g3 ¢e6 72.¢h4
to f5 and then retreating to e4. when the white king will approach the
pawn on f6.
60...¢g6 Now it’s a draw again.
66.¦h3 Threatening ¦h7.
61.¢f3+ ¢f7 62.¢e4
XIIIIIIIIY 66...¢g6 67.¦a3 ¢f7 68.¢f4 ¤h6
69.¦g3!
9-+-+-+-+0 XIIIIIIIIY
9+-+-+k+-0 9-+-+-+-+0
9-+-+-zp-+0 9+-+-+k+-0
9+-+n+-+-0 9-+-+-zp-sn0
9-+-+K+-+0 9+-+-+-+-0
9+-+-+-tR-0 9-+-+-mK-+0
9-+-+-+P+0 9+-+-+-tR-0
9+-+-+-+-0 9-+-+-+P+0
xiiiiiiiiy 9+-+-+-+-0
62...¤e7?? Vachier doesn’t take the
second chance. xiiiiiiiiy
It’s important to control the g-file so
62...¤c7! was crucial - the knight is en the black king cannot use it to prevent
route to g7 via e6, establishing the fortress. the white king from penetrating via the
h-file.
63.¢f4 ¤d5+ 64.¢f5 ¤e7+ 65.¢e4! ¤g8
XIIIIIIIIY 69...¤g8 70.¢g4 ¤e7 70...¢g6 doesn’t
stop White’s king. After 71.¢h4+ ¢h7
9-+-+-+n+0 (or 71...¢f7 72.¢h5) 72.¢h5 ¤e7 73.¦f3
9+-+-+k+-0 ¢g7 74.g3 ¢f7 75.g4 ¢g7 76.¦b3 ¢f7
77.¢h6 White breaks through.
9-+-+-zp-+0
9+-+-+-+-0 71.¢h5 ¤d5 72.¦f3 Now the threat is g4–g5.
9-+-+K+-+0 72...¢e6 73.g4 ¢e5 74.¢g6 After
9+-+-+-tR-0 74.¢g6 ¢e6 75.¦f2 threatening ¦e2
9-+-+-+P+0 75...¤e7+ 76.¢g7 ¤d5 77.¦e2+ ¢d6
78.¦d2 ¢e6 79.¦xd5 ¢xd5 80.¢xf6 the
9+-+-+-+-0 pawn endgame is an elementary win.
xiiiiiiiiy
Black keeps the knight on the kingside, but 1–0
he is beyond salvation now.
In case of 65...¤g6, 66.¦b3 ¦b7 and In the 9th round Vachier again chose his
f5 are the decisive threats. If Black usual opening, this time the Grunfeld,
tries to keep his knight on e7 then White and was lost by move 15.
can break through via the kingside. For
example: 66...¤e7 67.¦b7 ¢e6 68.g3!
A perfectly
executed event
despite the pandemic
Players and everyone involved in the Hands up! No electronic devices allowed: Arbiter
event had to be scanned and checked Andy Howie from Scotland scanning
for any electronic equipment, and this Alexander Grischuk
was also done in all rooms and spaces
at the venue.
1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 g6 Vachier is hoping for his 11.¥g5 ¥xc3+ Black wants to continue
beloved Grunfeld, but this time he is hit by with ...f6 and ...g5, so he exchanges the
dark-squared bishop in order not to
3.h4!? Usually this would be dismissed have it boxed in by its own pawns.
as not serious for this level, but today
everything should be taken seriously 12.bxc3 f6 13.¥d2 g5 14.0–0 ¤ge5?
when prepared with the help of
XIIIIIIIIY
powerful machines. 9r+l+k+-tr0
9zpp+nwq-+p0
3...¥g7 Deviating from his earlier game.
9-+-zp-zp-+0
At the Riga Grand Prix in 2019, Vachier 9+-zpPsn-zpP0
chose 3...c5 4.d5 b5 against Grischuk 9-+P+-+-+0
and he won, but the opening went
White’s way. 9+-zP-+N+-0
9P+-vLLzPP+0
4.¤c3 c5 Going for a Benoni structure.
9tR-+Q+RmK-0
In case of the typical Grunfeld move 4... xiiiiiiiiy
d5 White has 5.h5! ¤xh5 6.cxd5 with Vachier errs in the opening again. He
an advantage; Vachier has also tried the probably mixed things up as the knight
transposition to the King’s Indian after moving to e5 was the correct move; it
4...d6 5.e4 is just that he picked the wrong knight!
5.d5 d6 6.e4 e6 7.¥e2 exd5 8.exd5 ¤bd7 14...¤de5! was correct and Black would
9.¤f3 have been fine. The difference is that after
15.¤d4 0–0 White doesn’t have the move
XIIIIIIIIY ¤f5 because the bishop from c8 controls
9r+lwqk+-tr0 that square.
9zpp+n+pvlp0 15.¤d4! All of a sudden Black is in big
9-+-zp-snp+0 trouble. White threatens ¤f5 or ¤e6.
9+-zpP+-+-0
15...cxd4 16.cxd4 0–0? After this Black is
9-+P+-+-zP0 strategically lost.
9+-sN-+N+-0
Black had to keep the piece. White has
9PzP-+LzPP+0 ample compensation but it was still
9tR-vLQmK-+R0 the better chance. 16...¤f7 17.¥d3
xiiiiiiiiy 0–0 18.¦e1 £d8 19.a4: Black can
9.h5 is an alternative. 9...¤xh5 10.¥xh5 barely move, but White doesn’t have
gxh5 11.¦xh5 ¥xc3+ 12.bxc3 ¤e5 leads a direct breakthrough.
to an unclear position.
17.dxe5 fxe5 18.¥e3
9...¤g4 Black uses the weakened g4–square
to establish control over the e5–square.
11.¥f4 Targeting the knight once it comes 16.¤d2 f5 17.a3 £f6 18.b4 axb4 19.axb4
to d6. ¤a6 20.e4
XIIIIIIIIY
9r+-+r+-+0
9+lzpp+-mkp0
9nzp-sn-wqp+0
9+-+Pzpp+-0
9-zPP+P+-+0
9+-sN-+-zP-0
9-+QsN-zPLzP0
9+R+R+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy
With a dominating position for White. He kept
things under control and could even play for
a win, but eventually that wasn’t necessary.
Fabiano Caruana
½–½
10.f3 ¥h5 11.¥g5 11.dxc6 is an alternative. NOR 2019 16...£d5 is an improvement that
Then play is forced: 11...£d4+ 12.¢h1 gives Black easy equality.
¥xc3 13.bxc3 £xc3 and Black picks up
the pawn on c6 and manages to eliminate 13...¥xc3 14.bxc3 £xc3 15.¥e4 ¥g6
White’s bishop pair by ...¥g6. XIIIIIIIIY
11...£d6! 9r+-+-trk+0
XIIIIIIIIY 9zp-zp-+pzpp0
9r+-+-trk+0 9-+P+-+l+0
9zp-zp-+pzpp0 9+-+-+-+-0
9-+pwq-sn-+0 9-+-+L+-+0
9+-+P+-vLl0 9+-wq-+P+-0
9-vl-+-+-+0 9P+P+-+PzP0
9+-sNL+P+-0 9tR-+Q+RmK-0
9PzPP+-+PzP0 xiiiiiiiiy
With equality and the game ended in a
9tR-+Q+RmK-0 draw after 41 moves.
xiiiiiiiiy ½–½
The capture 11...cxd5 is again possible, but
Caruana’s move is the forcing solution.
I found it surprising that Caruana didn’t try
12.¥xf6 £xf6 13.dxc6 The alternative to make his own fortune by taking things
13.¤e4 was played in a high-level into his own hands. He said that he thought
game. After 13...£xb2 14.dxc6 ¥g6 it was still early, with 3 rounds to go, to burn
15.¢h1 £d4 16.£e2 1–0 (30) Yu Yangyi his bridges. In truth, he only postponed the
(2738)-Mamedyarov,S (2774) Stavanger burning of the said bridges for one round, as
Showing early promise, it seemed that he would squander his potential when, in spite of
his successes such as winning the Russian Championship and the European Individual
Championship in 2010, he preferred to dedicate time to the video game DOTA and even
played it semi-professionally.
In his own words, the last several years have been crucial for his rise – he started to
work on chess in a professional manner and this showed in his results.
It only speaks of his talent that he managed to be near the top without proper work,
but now with this victory and particularly the amount of work that preceded it
Nepomniachtchi is on another level.
We know what Fischer did. He didn’t 1.e4 c5 Giri’s prepared opening for
wait for the white pieces. He essayed the the Candidates was the Sveshnikov
Modern Benoni and beat Spassky for the Sicilian. He had already played it against
first time in his life. This game swung the Nepomniachtchi and Vachier.
momentum in Fischer’s favour and the rest
is well known. 2.¤f3 e6 Perhaps a small surprise. Giri
doesn’t play 2...¤c6 (like he did in
I am convinced that Caruana had to take the other two games) likely wanting to
that chance to try to beat Nepomniachtchi. avoid Caruana’s World Championship
We alone are the builders of our fortune and preparation in the 7.¤d5 line or the option
leaving it for others to decide on matters of a Rossolimo after 3.¥b5 (also used by
that are of vital importance never leads to Caruana in that match).
what we really want.
2...¤c6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¤c3
Giri’s Risk Strategy e5 6.¤db5 d6 7.¤d5 This was Vachier’s
choice and was used extensively by Caruana
Anish Giri was impressive. First, he did in the match with Carlsen in 2018. (7.¥g5
what Vachier didn’t do – he came with an Nepomniachtchi chose the other main move.
opening surprise, the Sveshnikov Sicilian, After 7...a6 8.¤a3 b5 9.¤d5 ¥e7 10.¥xf6
and it worked wonders. Second, he did what ¥xf6 11.c3 ¦b8 12.¤c2 ¥g5 he went for
Caruana didn’t do – he took things into his 13.g3 instead of the main lines after 13.a4.
own hands and took his chances. Giri was Giri had no problems after 13...0–0 14.h4
also very effective with White – he beat ¥h6 15.a3 a5) 7...¤xd5 8.exd5 ¤b8
both Wang Hao and Ding Liren in excellent 9.c4 (In the match with Carlsen Caruana
focused on the move 9.a4) 9...¥e7 and a6 10.0–0 b5 was fine for Black, but he
here instead of 10.¥e2 or 10.¥d3 Vachier later misplayed it and ended up in trouble
chose the rare 10.c5!? though objectively before saving the draw. ½–½ (54) Anand,V
speaking the move does not pose particular (2756)-Giri,A (2779) Saint Louis 2019
problems in the opening.
7...0–0 8.¥e2 8.f4 is again possible, but
3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¤c3 ¤c6 By Black is fine after 8...d6 followed by ...e5.
choosing this move-order to enter the (Or the immediate 8...e5)
Sveshnikov Black must be ready for the
theoretically important 6.¤xc6, apart from 8...d6 9.£d3!?
a few deviations like the move played in the XIIIIIIIIY
game or 6.¥e2.
9r+lwq-trk+0
6.a3!? 9zpp+-vlpzpp0
XIIIIIIIIY 9-+nzppsn-+0
9r+lwqkvl-tr0 9+-+-+-+-0
9zpp+p+pzpp0 9-+-sNP+-+0
9-+n+psn-+0 9zP-sNQvL-+-0
9+-+-+-+-0 9-zPP+LzPPzP0
9-+-sNP+-+0 9tR-+-mK-+R0
9zP-sN-+-+-0 xiiiiiiiiy
9-zPP+-zPPzP0 A curious move. The queen lends extra
support to the pawn on e4 and allows a
9tR-vLQmKL+R0 long castle.
xiiiiiiiiy
I am not sure Caruana was completely 9.f4 can be met by 9...e5; After 9.0–0 Black
caught off guard by Giri’s move-order, has several good options like 9...a6 (9...e5;
especially as Giri had played it before 9...¥d7; 9...£c7)
against Anand in 2019. In fact he chooses
the same move Anand played in that game. 9...¥d7 Black finishes development. It was
possible to play 9...a6 as well but Black
6.¤db5 d6 7.¥f4 e5 8.¥g5 is a direct always tries to choose a plan based on ...e5
transposition to the Sveshnikov.; 6.¤xc6 rather than on ...b5 because in the former
bxc6 7.e5 ¤d5 8.¤e4 is a huge theoretical case the move a3 is a pure loss of tempo,
chapter when Black can choose between while in the latter case it is a useful move
8...£c7 and 8...¥b7. stopping ...b4.
6...¥e7 7.¥e3 7.f4 is an alternative, one 10.f4 10.0–0–0 can be met by 10...¤e5
that Giri has already faced. 7...d6 Giri’s 11.£d2 ¤fg4 eliminating one of White’s
choice. (7...0–0 was Mamedyarov’s choice bishops since after White’s long castle the
against Carlsen played at the Carlsen king no longer defends the f2–square so the
Invitational. Black was fine after 8.e5 (The bishop on e3 cannot leave its spot.
move 8.¥e3 can be met by either 8...e5 or
8...d6.) 8...¤d5 9.¤xd5 exd5 10.¤xc6 bxc6 10...e5 The usual pawn break in the centre
1–0 (27) Carlsen,M (2847)-Mamedyarov,S gives Black good play.
(2770) chess24.com INT 2021). 8.¤f3
Avoiding ideas based on ...e5. (After 11.¤xc6 bxc6 12.0–0 12.0–0–0 is again met
8.¥e3 e5!? Black is fine.) 8...0–0 9.¥d3 by 12...¤g4, obtaining the pair of bishops.
After 13.¥xg4 ¥xg4 14.¦d2 £a5 play ¥h4 16.£e3 £b6: now taking the pawn
is unclear because White cannot trap the gives Black good compensation after
bishop by 15.f5? in view of 15...d5! 16.exd5 17.£xb6 axb6 18.¥xd6?! ¤xd6 19.¦xd6
¥xa3! which wins for Black.; 12.fxe5 dxe5 ¦fc8 thanks to the excellent control over
is fine for Black, whose central pawns the dark squares after ...¥f6;
control the important squares d4 and d5.
14...h5!? is the engine’s suggestion. No
12...exf4 With this exchange Black obtains sane human would think of this, but the
the e5–square for his knight. machine claims it works. The point is to
harass the queen by ...h4. 15.¢h1 (15.¦ad1
13.¥xf4 ¥e6 Natural, intending ...¤d7–e5, h4!) 15...h4 16.£e1 ¦e8 with unclear play
but allowing White some initiative. as White has no pressure on d6 any more;
14...£b6+? is bad in view of 15.¢h1 £xb2
13...¥g4!? is the engine’s suggestion, but 16.¦ab1 £xc2 (or 16...£xa3 17.¤d5 £xg3
one that is very difficult for a human to play. 18.¤xe7+ ¢h8 19.¥xg3 with a piece up.)
The reason is that in these positions Black 17.¥h6 which is winning for White.
aims to exchange the dark-squared bishops,
since his light-squared bishop is better than 15.¦ad1 15.¥xd6?! is dubious as Black
White’s, which is limited by its own pawn takes the pawn on b2 after 15...£b6+
on e4. Still, as always, the engine has a 16.¢h1 ¥xd6 17.£xd6 £xb2
concrete point. 14.¦ad1 (14.¥xg4 ¤xg4
15.¢h1 ¤e5 is comfortable for Black.; 15...¦e8 Black cannot go after the pawn
14.¢h1 ¥xe2 15.£xe2 ¦e8 16.¦ad1 on b2 because White has 15...£b6+?!
£c7 and Black has a compact position.) which is met by 16.¥e3! £xb2? 17.¤d5!
14...¥xe2 15.¤xe2 d5! liberating his play cxd5 18.¥d4, threatening mate on g7 and
and equalising. attacking the queen on b6.
undermine White’s queenside and weaken it. 22.¥xe5 dxe5 23.¥g4 was better, keeping
17.b3! was Caruana’s best chance for an the balance.
advantage. But he had to see that after
17...¤e5 White should play 18.¥h5!! 22...¤g6! Black starts to take over.
liberating the e2–square for the knight.
After 18...g6 19.¤e2! ¢h8 20.¥f3 23.¥d2?! The third passive move.
followed by ¤d4, White has harmoniously
regrouped his pieces. 23.¥g4 still kept the balance. After
23...¤xf4 24.¤xf4 ¥xg4 25.£xg4 ¦xc3
17...¤e5 18.b5 ¦c8 19.bxc6 ¦xc6 20.¤d5 26.¦b1, thanks to the strong knight on
White has achieved his aim, but Black’s d5, White will have good compensation.
position is compact and he has counterplay
along the c-file. 23...¥h4!
After such a wonderful effort it was line caught some attention after it was used
surprising to see Giri choose a toothless by Carlsen a few times.
opening against Grischuk in the next
round. It seemed to me that he wasn’t sure 8...£e7 Nepomniachtchi goes for the
what he was playing for – a win (in case endgame. The alternative is 8...¥e6.
Nepomniachtchi beat Vachier in order to
stay within half a point) or a draw (in case 9.£xe7+ ¢xe7 10.0–0 ¤c6 Black
Nepomniachtchi and Vachier drew, again to speeds up his development, though the
stay within half a point). In any case, the knight doesn’t usually stand so well on
Bogo-Indian was too stale and when he c6 in these structures because after c3 it
tried to play for more than just equality it has no prospects.
backfired badly.
11.c3!?
A disappointed Giri even lost in the last XIIIIIIIIY
round to Alekseenko, staining his fantastic
run, but it’s clear that in the year that 9r+l+-+-tr0
passed he improved a lot, both on the board 9zppzp-mkpzpp0
and psychologically, and I am sure that he
will take this result as a starting point for 9-+nvl-sn-+0
further work and improvement. 9+-+p+-+-0
Nepomniachtchi’s Win
9-+-zP-+-+0
9+-zPL+N+-0
The winner employed a controlled strategy. 9PzP-+-zPPzP0
He didn’t mind draws, but he was also very
alert to take the chances that came to him. 9tRNvL-+RmK-0
A typical illustration of this was his game xiiiiiiiiy
against Wang Hao. A rare move. Usually White gives the check
on e1 before playing c3. As we shall see,
Wang Hao - Ian Nepomniachtchi Wang Hao intends to use the position of
Black’s king on e7 by sending his knight
FIDE Candidates Tournament (12.4) to f5.
1.e4 e5 Black’s best openings when needing 11...h6 12.¤h4 This is White’s idea. The
a draw are the Petroff and the Berlin. knight cannot be tolerated on f5 so Black
will win the bishop pair.
2.¤f3 ¤f6 The Petroff is somewhat
more forced in character and it also has 12...¦e8 13.¤f5+ ¥xf5 14.¥xf5 ¢f8
the added benefit of avoiding the Italian. 15.g3 The endgame is equal, but White has
In spite of his preference for sharper the better long-term prospects in view of
play Nepomniachtchi showed that he the pair of bishops. Wang Hao’s strategy
can be flexible and play according to the for this game is now clear: he wanted
requirements of the situation. to give Black "near equality" where he
hoped he would relax and commit small
3.¤xe5 d6 4.¤f3 ¤xe4 5.d3 A curious inaccuracies which would put him under
choice by Wang Hao. He transposes to a pressure both psychologically and over the
line of the Exchange French where White board. Nepomniachtchi deserves full credit
has some initiative. for not falling into this trap.
5...¤f6 6.d4 d5 7.¥d3 ¥d6 8.£e2+ The 15...¤e7 16.¥h3 ¤c8 The knight has not
only move to cause Black any trouble. This reached its final destination yet. From c8 it
Having won the strongest Swiss tournament ever played - the Isle of Man Grand Swiss,
in 2019 - Wang Hao seemed like a rising far−eastern wind, gaining force on his way to
conquer the Norwegian chess king. But, the promise of a storm ended in a calm.
After the final round of the Candidates in Yekaterinburg, Wang Hao - who finished last
- said he is retiring from professional chess because ‘of some health issues’, adding: ‘I
just don’t think I can continue in this profession. I’ll do coaching… but I don’t think I
can do anything which brings too much stress’.
When asked directly does that mean he’s retiring from chess, Wang Hao responded:
‘Yes, exactly’. He added he doesn’t mind doing ‘a friendly match’ or ‘some shows’,
but he can’t continue professionally, citing health issues which have been with him for
years, noting that things started to get worse since 2019.
With an ELO of 2744, Wang Hao leaves professional chess as the 17th strongest player
in the world and the second strongest Chinese (behind Ding Liren). In 2019 he won
the Asian Championship which gave him a card for the Isle of Man Grand Swiss from
where he qualified for the 2020 Candidates.
Among Wang Hao’s many success, one stands out in particular: in 2005 he won
the Dubai Open as an untitled player, finishing ahead of 53 Grandmasters and 30
International Masters. He became GM in 2005 and entered the world’s top 100 in 2007.
During his professional career Wang Hao played 12 times against Magnus Carlsen,
with two victories, six draws and four losses.
57.¢g1 ¦xf3 58.¤e4 ¦e3 59.¤g3 ¦a3 Grischuk’s chances were immediately
XIIIIIIIIY squashed as he lost the first game in round
eight to Alekseenko, somebody he was
9-+-tR-+-+0 desperately trying to beat. But Grischuk
9+-+-+pmk-0 was crucial in Nepomniachtchi’s win as
he dispatched of both followers - he beat
9-+-+-+p+0 Vachier in round 11 and Giri in round 13.
9+-+-+-+-0 Curiously enough, this is the first time that
9-+-+-+P+0 Grischuk ended a Candidates tournament
on 50% − in all the previous ones where he
9tr-+-+-sNp0 played he had a negative score.
9-sn-+-+-zP0
Alekseenko was the most unstable
9+-+-+-mK-0 player of the tournament. He had good
xiiiiiiiiy games and beat Grischuk and Giri, but
And here Wang Hao resigned. While the he also had awful ones, especially in
position is objectively lost, White can still the openings: he was lost in his games
fight. This was surprising, but Wang Hao gave with Vachier and Nepomniachtchi
his reasons after the end of the tournament. after some 10 moves! He also missed
a golden chance to beat Ding Liren
0–1 after the latter incorrectly sacrificed a
piece − instead of winning Alekseenko
blundered and lost instead. Nobody
Nepomniachtchi’s win showed that he had was expecting much from him and as is
matured from the unstable talent who could usual in such cases people tend to say
beat anyone and who could lose to anyone. that this will be great experience for the
Under the extreme stress of the Candidates young player.
he managed to control his nerves and
perform under pressure, something that Wang Hao finished last after losing
all the other participants failed to do. This his final three games. Even last year
was the key to his success. His newly found he was the most vocal player, stating
balance of his aggressive and dynamic his dissatisfaction with the whole
approach with the pragmatic need to play tournament being played under the
safely gave an extra dimension to his play. circumstances. This year it was obvious
This was in stark contrast to Vachier, who that again he wasn’t very happy. When
remained the same as a player and with the the tournament finished he announced
same approach. his retirement from professional chess.
As the main reason he stated health
The winner of the second problems that have been plaguing him
leg of the tournament – since 2019 and which became worse
Ding Liren after his game with Grischuk in round
10 − after that game he even thought
The winner of the second half of the of quitting the tournament. Eventually
Candidates was Ding Liren, with 4.5/7, he didn’t, but resigning prematurely
who won his last three games beating the (as in the games with Nepomniachtchi
Russian players. Eventually he ended on and Caruana) was a clear indication
50% and can take positives from how he that Wang Hao couldn’t take the stress
ended the event, even though he must be any longer. Professional chess is a very
disappointed not to have been in contention. stressful job, so hopefully now Wang
But the damage was done last year, so there Hao will be able to find the peace he
was nothing more he could do this time. seems to be needing.
Carlsen’s message to Nepo following the news of him becoming the Candidate
HOW THE
CHIEF ARBITER,
NEBOJSA BARALIC,
SAW THE
HISTORIC
CANDIDATES
TOURNAMENT IN
YEKATERINBURG
preparing for the Candidates - by watching steps are taken before the event, via email,
videos and materials from previous and then in person - starting from the
similar events, checking and confirming technical meeting, where the key rules and
the regulations. For the players, the most conditions are discussed and any concerns
important thing is their play and they are are raised and analysed. That meeting is a
devoted to preparations and the analysis of foundation for the whole tournament. For
the opponents. For me as an arbiter, my key an experienced arbiter, even by looking at
responsibility was to make sure that they the gestures and the posture of the players
have the best possible playing conditions. he/she can tell what will happen or what
In purely technical terms, that includes the questions they might ask and you already
comfort of the playing venue, the chairs, start thinking about what needs to be done.
the pieces, adequate lighting and room
temperature, private and secure access to When it comes to Yekaterinburg, the play of
the toilets and so on. Overall, the goal is to all rounds lasted 75 hours and 14 minutes.
make sure that the players feel comfortable In every minute of that time, everything
in the playing hall and confident in the had to be at the highest level and all of us
organisers and arbiters. involved from the organisational side had
to be at our very best.
As BCM readers will remember, the
tournament started in the middle of March One of the most common questions to a
2020, when everything in the world was chess arbiter is - what are we doing and
stopping or closing due to, at the time, an what are we thinking about while the
unknown and mysterious virus. As we were games are going on? Games can sometimes
playing the rounds in the first part of the last up to seven hours and as much as
tournament, distressing news kept coming it’s important to the players, it’s equally
every hour - about the numbers of infected, important to the arbiter to stay focused and
the spread and the origin of the virus, cries concentrated on what is happening. In the
for help by medical staff, countries closing case of the arbiter, that includes both on but
borders, people being stranded abroad. also off the board.
With this came concern and distress for
the players, staff, arbiters - everyone. I can Working closely with my colleague Andy
only imagine how difficult it was for the Howie from Scotland, who was my deputy,
players to be playing, not knowing if they we made sure we don’t lose sight of the
should even shake the opponent’s hand and players for one second. This doesn’t mean
thinking about the risk of being in a closed we act like police officers, but we just had
area, or about their loved ones. But - at such to keep an eye on the players while they
a high level - everyone has to keep their were playing, looking around or going for
cool, stay professional and decent, and we a walk or the toilet. Every half−hour we
did our best to do just that. made sure we checked that the clocks were
accurate to the second, that the score sheets
The second leg of the event went much are filled in properly, and - following the
more smoothly. Given that the world seems Fair Play rules - we were checking all the
to have come to grips with COVID - that areas which the players had access to for
much more is known now than in March electronic devices.
2020, that there are clear rules of social
distancing and that there are vaccines - the I took the view that it’s better to act
second leg of the event seemed more like a preventively than to have to solve a
proper, regular chess event. problem later. In that case, while looking
at the games and what’s happening
As an arbiter, you need to build trust with around I tried to anticipate the potential
the players and the people involved. First situations which might arouse and what
Nebojsa Baralic and Ian Nepomniatchi with the disc containing the music composed by Svetozar Gligoric
can be done to prevent them or promptly audience could not come and watch the
resolve them. Luckily, in Yekaterinburg, games in person, from the perspective
we had the world’s elite playing. They are of the arbiter team, it made things easier
all extremely versed and professional so as monitoring the spectators and what
the chances of there being any problems happens in the audience is challenging and
were minimal. distracting task.
One strange thing, however, was the The FIDE 2020/2021 Candidates
absence of the public as this was a high− tournament will be the subject of many
profile event and we were playing in Russia, analysis, articles, maybe even books.
of all places! Given the circumstances, this Hopefully, the world will never again
was understandable. Coming from Serbia have to face a global disaster like the one
(which some may remember as Yugoslavia) in 2020. It should be also seen as an event
I know very well what a big audience where chess - of all sports - stood bravely
at a chess event is like. In 1997 I was in the face of uncertainty, by players and
working as a demonstrator at the famous organisers acting responsibly, keeping calm
“Investbanka” GM tournament, where the and carrying on doing what they do best -
world’s elite at the time played in front of play chess. Hopefully, the event will also be
at least 2000 people. There we often had remembered by having good arbiters.
to calm the audience and warn them not to
clap too loudly after a game had finished. As a thank you to the players and the
The players who were playing at these organisers for being professional and
Investbanka tournaments said they never respectful to Andy Howie and myself,
experienced anything similar anywhere following the closing ceremony I gave
in the world. You don’t see that any more each of them a disc published in 2011,
at events, but I was expecting something containing the music composed by none
close in Yekaterinburg. However, the other than the great Svetozar Gligoric.
circumstances did not allow for that. And, Hopefully, they will enjoy it and it will
although I was very sad that the Russian help them relax.
Participants at the Moscow 1935 tournament. Krylenko is sitting in the middle at the front next to Lasker.
Bogatyrchuk and Romanovsky occupy the corners of the front row.
THE RUSSIAN
(CHESS) REVOLUTION
By early 1917 Russia had entered a period
of massive upheavals which, in a way, it
stayed in for the next several decades. The
years of the Civil War meant great hardship
in Petrograd, as St Petersburg was now
renamed. Romanovsky himself noted times
when he was trying to play chess, then was
called out to dig trenches in parts of the city. A. Alekhine (left) and P. Romanovsky,
Many chess players died, some fled, the All- the All-Russian Amateur Tournament
Russsian Chess Union collapsed. (Chigorin Memorial, 1909)
to demonstrate that a completely fresh view the orbit of this whirlwind of energy. The
of chess and life was there to be exhibited. frenetic schedule was one that he somehow
That self - imposed mission, however, would maintained for the rest of his life (he died in
have to be followed in the midst of his heavy 1964). Clearly he could not expect to obtain
responsibilities with one of the State Banks optimal tournament results while living this
where he eventually became an authoritative way. His professional responsibilities were
voice on financial matters. Monetary reform, of ever increasing too – and he had married in
a highly complex kind, was a core component 1912 and a young family (three daughters)
of the changes now being very swiftly was starting to grow.
introduced. From that financial perspective,
the introduction of the New Economic Policy THE ’NEW WAVE’
(in March 1921 – 100 years later, it seems as
if the whole world is in need of one!)) was In this seminal decade of the 1920s, chess
important. It signalled that the soon-to-be outside the Soviet Union had entered into
Soviet Union (the country was established feverish developments, characterised by the
in 1922) would be creating new directions in hypermodern movement. Romanovsky did
every dimension of life. From the perspective not miss this. Several of the concepts of the
of Peter Arsenyevich, nothing could have ‘new wave’ were on show in the great New
been better! His vision and that of the country York tournament of 1924. Thus he duly
could coincide – everything could change. produced an annotated edition of the games of
that event. And also proceeded to try out some
A NEW HOPE of those concepts in games of his own, above
all in the Moscow International Tournament
From the start, the Petrograd (subsequently of 1925, to which the leading foreign players
Leningrad) group of chess players, of which were invited. He stated clearly that he was not
Romanovsky was a crucial member, saw their particularly prepared before these games (an
task as that of popularising the game with the affirmation he made regularly, asserting that
ordinary people. The 64 squares would now too much preparation might stifle creativity
symbolise the artistic achievements of the – what would he have made of our reliance
new régime. Romanovsky thus took on the on computer analysis, data bases and all the
triple challenge of diffusing didactic material, rest?), yet certainly regarded it as his duty to
via the publication he more or less edited, and disseminate information and experiment with
ran “Shakmatny Listok” (thereby recreating innovative approaches. The Romanovsky
for the new generation what Tchigorin’s doctrine was to keep improving best practice,
columns in “Neve Vremy” had been for the long before any business school had thought
young Romanovsky); conducting lectures, of the term - and actually long before any
giving simultaneous displays and developing business school existed.
training material for courses given primarily
within the Trade Union bodies and, later, some Meanwhile, the centralised institutional
universities; and playing in every tournament structure of the Soviet Union had been taking
he could. In effect, through these titanic shape, and chess did not escape the architecture.
efforts, he was building the foundations of Nikolai Krylenko, who was a Deputy People’s
the Soviet School of chess. As Yuri Averbakh, Commissar of Justice, had in 1924 been
the only living survivor of this epoch and unanimously elected as the leader of Soviet
himself deeply influenced by Romanovsky’s chess (a post he retained until his execution
teachings (although his personal style of play in 1939). Personality clashes with someone as
was quite different), remarks in an afterword volatile and passionate as Romanovsky were
to the book, there was virtually no player inevitable. Disputes ranged from the content of
growing up in these years who was outside articles published in Shakmatny Listok, on to
what was contained in some of the many chess in Open Access and innovation, it was Peter
manuals he was producing, through public Arsenyevich. What he was so forcefully
disagreements over the costs of participation advocating nearly a century ago could
in tournaments, and very delicate matters scarcely be more topical.
relating to top Russian players who moved
abroad (who of course had to be metaphorically DEATH AND LIFE – WW2
‘disappeared’ from tournament records,
airbrushed from photographs and otherwise By the time the war with Germany started,
rendered invisible). In retrospect it seems Romanovsky had four daughters and was a
astonishing that Romanovsky survived all these widower. His wife had died during the birth
relatively unscathed. But he did and managed to of the youngest daughter, Anya. He was still
pursue his endeavours right through the 1930s. in Leningrad (St Petersburg) when the siege
began. As conditions rapidly worsened, and
One of these battles with authority deserves his own heart condition was by now serious,
mention for the light it shines on Romanovsky’s calamity of the most awful kind struck. All
concepts of achievement. The dispute four children died of starvation in the space
concerned qualifications for receiving titles in of 20 days during the month of January 1942
chess (the equivalent, if you will, of university (most reliable estimates conclude that more
and professional diplomas). In the June 1928 than 600,000 people died of starvation in the
issue of Shakmatny Listok (the official siege). In that terrible winter, their bodies were
publication of the Chess Executive Bureau), frozen into the ice outside the Romanovsky
an article appeared on this subject. Certainly apartment. Tkachenko relates how, for some
Kryalenko would have had to approve the time, Romanovsky was surviving inside
article, since it was in effect proposing a decree while still able to see the corpses of his loved
on the subject. Romanovsky denounced the ones more or less next to him. Later in 1942,
content as dry bureaucracy, inimical to the Romanovsky was taken to Ivanovo for
creative endeavour. He offered the highly medical treatment. Even there, he managed to
original suggestion that titles (categories as continue organising chess events, give lectures
they were called) should be awarded not only and continue writing. The games collection
on tournament results (exam scores), but also includes one win of his at the sanatorium.
taking into account the creative content of a
person’s play and their commitment to public By now, it is no surprise to learn that, once the
service in chess (in other words, diffusing war was finished, Romanovsky continued at
their knowledge to others). If anyone believed the same incredible pace as ever. He remarried
and had two more children. It is in fact through
his son Victor, born in 1945, that Tkatchenko
has been able to obtain much of the splendid
material in the biography. Later, again a
widower, he married a third time. His strength
as a player was still very considerable – even
as he was being overtaken by several of his
numerous disciples (the ultimate accolade for
any great teacher). Immediately after the war,
the radio match (10 boards, double round)
between USSR and the Rest of the World had
At the 1945 USSR vs USA radio match, produced that tremendous victory of 15,5 –
Soviet team headquarters. Romanovsky is to the 4,5 for the USSR. For Romanovsky, who had
left. In the middle is N. Feldman, head of the taken part in the pilot trial to see if everything
technical service.
was working smoothly at the technical level
GROUP A
rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 rd6 rd7 P W D L MP GP
1 Guildford Young Guns gyg ssi 3 sch 4 brok 2½ blk 3½ daf1 1½ wesa 2½ hw1 4 7 6 0 1 12 21
2 Downend 1 daf1 hw1 2 ssi 1½ sch 3½ brok 1½ gyg 2½ blk 2½ wesa 3½ 7 4 1 2 9 17
3 Sussex Social Isolators ssi gyg 1 daf1 2½ wesa 3 hw1 4 blk 2½ sch 1½ brok 2 7 4 1 2 9 16½
4 Broadland Kestrels brok sch 4 blk 2 gyg 1½ daf1 2½ wesa 1½ hw1 3 ssi 2 7 3 2 2 8 16½
5 Wessex Some Stars A wesa blk 1½ hw1 2½ ssi 1 sch 3½ brok 2½ gyg 1½ daf1 ½ 7 3 0 4 6 13
6 Blackthorne Russia blk wesa 1½ brok 2 hw1 1½ gyg ½ ssi 1½ daf1 1½ sch 3½ 7 2 1 4 5 13
7 Harrow 1 hw1 daf1 2 wesa1½ blk 2½ ssi 0 sch 2½ brok 1 gyg 0 7 2 1 4 5 9½
8 Schach Attack sch brok 0 gyg 0 daf1 ½ wesa ½ hw1 1½ ssi 2½ blk ½ 7 1 0 6 2 5½
GROUP B
rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 rd6 rd7 P W D L MP GP
1 Chessable White Rose 1 wro1 mus 1 3½ sst 4 soaa 3 csc1 3 wun 3 ang1 3½ wat1 3 7 7 0 0 14 23
2 Mushrooms 1 mus1 wro1 ½ wat1 2½ ang1 3 sst 4 soaa 2½ csc1 1½ wun 3 7 5 0 2 10 17
3 CSC 1 csc1 soaa 2½ ang1 1½ wun 3½ wro1 1 wat1 1½ mus1 2½ sst 3½ 7 4 0 3 8 16
4 Watford 1 wat1 ang1 2½ mus1 1½ sst 3 soaa 1½ csc1 2½ wun 2 wro1 1 7 3 1 3 7 14
5 Anglia Avengers 1 ang1 wat1 1½ csc1 2½ mus1 1 wun 3 sst 2½ wro1 ½ soaa 2 7 3 1 3 7 13
6 Spirit of Atticus A soaa csc1 1½ wun 1½ wro1 1 wat1 2½ mus1 1½ sst 3 ang1 2 7 2 1 4 5 13
7 Warwick University wun sst 2½ soaa 2½ csc1 ½ ang1 1 wro1 1 wat1 2 mus1 1 7 2 1 4 5 10½
8 Sussex Starlings sst wun 1½ wro1 0 wat1 1 mus1 ½ ang1 1½ soaa 1 csc1 ½ 7 0 0 7 0 5
GROUP B
rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 rd6 rd7 P W D L MP GP
1 Chessable White Rose 2 wro2 brea 2 oxf1 3 atta 3½ cat1 2½ aba1 3 bar 2½ shr1 3½ 7 6 1 0 13 20
2 Barbican bar oxf1 2½ atta 2½ cat1 3½ aba1 2½ shr1 3½ wro2 1 brea 2 7 5 1 1 11 17½
3 Brentwood A brea wro2 2 shr1 4 oxf1 1½ atta 3½ cat1 2½ aba1 3 bar 2 7 4 2 1 10 18½
4 Oxford 1 oxf1 bar 1½ wro2 1 brea 2½ shr1 4 atta 2½ cat1 2½ aba1 3 7 5 0 2 10 17
5 Alba Bon Accord 1 aba1 atta 2½ cat1 2½ shr1 3½ bar 1½ wro2 1 brea 1 oxf1 1 7 3 0 4 6 13
6 Catford Cosmonauts 1 cat1 shr1 3 aba1 1½ bar ½ wro2 1½ brea 1½ oxf1 1½ atta 3 7 2 0 5 4 12½
7 Atticus A atta aba1 1½ bar 1½ wro2 ½ brea ½ oxf1 1½ shr1 3½ cat1 1 7 1 0 6 2 10
8 Shropshire 1 shr1 cat1 1 brea 0 aba1 ½ oxf1 0 bar ½ atta ½ wro2 ½ 7 0 0 7 0 3
GROUP D
rd1 rd2 rd3 rd4 rd5 rd6 rd7 P W D L MP GP
1 Celtic Tigers & Sharks cel1 tfp 4 stba 3½ duna 4 exe 3½ kesa 2½ alb 2 psp 2½ 7 6 1 0 13 22
2 Alba alb duna 3½ kesa 2½ psp 3 stba 1 exe 3 cel1 2 tfp 3½ 7 5 1 1 11 18½
3 St Benildus A stba psp 1½ cel1 ½ exe 3 alb 3 tfp 2½ duna 2½ kesa 2½ 7 5 0 2 10 15½
4 Kent KJCA Kestrels A kesa exe 2½ alb 1½ tfp 3 duna 3 cel1 1½ psp 2½ stba 1½ 7 4 1 3 8 15½
5 Dundee City A duna alb ½ tfp 2½ cel1 0 kesa 1 psp 2½ stba 1½ exe 2 7 2 0 4 5 10
6 Poisoned Pawns psp stba 2½ exe 3 alb 1 tfp 1½ duna 1½ kesa 1½ cel1 1½ 7 2 0 5 4 12½
7 Exeter Honey Badgers exe kesa 1½ psp 1 stba 1 cel1 ½ alb 1 tfp 3 duna 2 7 1 1 5 3 10
8 The Full Ponty tfp cel1 0 duna 1½ kesa 1 psp 2½ stba 1½ exe 1 alb ½ 7 1 0 6 2 8
XIIIIIIIIY
Here are some of the games, starting 9r+lwqk+-tr0
with a sharp win from Gawain Jones
the top board of Chessable White Rose 9zppzpp+pzpp0
first team 9-+-+-+-+0
9+Lvl-sn-+-0
Gawain Jones – Matthew Piper
9-+-zPn+-+0
4NCL Online S3 Div1 2020 lichess.org INT (4.61)
9+-+-+-+-0
1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥b5 ¤f6 4.0–0 ¥c5 9PzPP+QzPPzP0
XIIIIIIIIY 9tRNvL-+RmK-0
9r+lwqk+-tr0 xiiiiiiiiy
White will regain the piece and Black must
9zppzpp+pzpp0 decide how to get castled.
9-+n+-sn-+0 7...¥e7 7...£e7 8.dxc5 ¤xc5 9.¦e1
9+Lvl-zp-+-0 ¤g6 10.¤c3 c6 is playable though not
9-+-+P+-+0 easy for Black.
9+-+-+N+-0 8.dxe5 White has the advantage because of
9PzPPzP-zPPzP0 the cramping effect of the pawn on e5.
9tRNvLQ+RmK-0 8...¤c5 9.¦d1 0–0 10.¤c3
xiiiiiiiiy XIIIIIIIIY
The Berlin Classical: an active 9r+lwq-trk+0
choice for Black aiming for quick 9zppzppvlpzpp0
piece development.
9-+-+-+-+0
5.¤xe5 The sharpest move, aiming to take 9+Lsn-zP-+-0
advantage of the bishop on c5. 9-+-+-+-+0
5...¤xe4 5...¤xe5 6.d4 a6 is worth 9+-sN-+-+-0
consideration, favoured by Spassky. 9PzPP+QzPPzP0
6.£e2 ¤xe5 7.d4 9tR-vLR+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy
BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE | 293
05/141
10...¦e8 An inaccuracy; 10...c6 looks best 8.¤h3 ¤g4 9.¥d4 ¥xd4 10.£xd4 0–0
after 11.¥c4 b5, with counterplay on the 11.¤d5 11.¤f4 is good, driving the black
queenside for Black. queen away from h5.
11.£f3 Strong; White aims at f7, removing 11...¤c6 12.£e4 d6 13.0–0 13.¤xe7+
the queen from the e-file and also ¤xe7 14.£xe7 £a5+ 15.¢f1 ¥f5 gives
preventing the black queen’s bishop from Black counterplay.
emerging with b6.
13...¥f5 14.¤xe7+ ¤xe7 15.£xe7 ¦ae8
11...f6 11...¤e6 12.¤e4 is not pleasant for 16.£xd6 ¦xe2
Black but was essential. XIIIIIIIIY
12.¥c4+ ¢h8 13.b4 Winning a piece by 9-+-+-trk+0
trapping the knight. 9zpp+-+p+p0
13...fxe5 If 13...¤a6 14.¥xa6 or 13...¤e6 9-+-wQ-+p+0
14.¥xe6 ¥xb4 15.¥b3. 9+-+-+l+q0
14.bxc5 ¥xc5 15.¤e4 ¥e7 16.£h5 d6
9-+P+-+n+0
17.¥f7 With the double threat of ¥xe8 and 9+-+-+-zPN0
¥g6, so Black resigned. 9PzP-+rzPLzP0
1–0 9tR-+-+RmK-0
xiiiiiiiiy
17.¦fe1 ¦xb2 18.£d4 ¦c2 19.¦e7 ¥e6
Mark Hebden, played top board 20.¦e1 ¦xc4 21.£b2 £c5 Black switches
for Guildford Young Guns and won the queen with good effect.
as follows
22.¦xb7 ¦c2 23.£b4 £xb4 24.¦xb4 h5
Richard Bates - Mark Hebden 25.a4 ¦a2
4NCL Online S3 Div1 2020 lichess.org INT (4.11) XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-trk+0
1.d4 g6 2.c4 ¥g7 3.¤c3 ¤f6 4.g3 c5 9zp-+-+p+-0
5.dxc5 £a5 6.¥g2 £xc5
9-+-+l+p+0
XIIIIIIIIY 9+-+-+-+p0
9rsnl+k+-tr0 9PtR-+-+n+0
9zpp+pzppvlp0 9+-+-+-zPN0
9-+-+-snp+0 9r+-+-zPLzP0
9+-wq-+-+-0 9+-+-tR-mK-0
9-+P+-+-+0 xiiiiiiiiy
9+-sN-+-zP-0 Black has the advantage, with his active
9PzP-+PzPLzP0 rook on the seventh (second) row.
9tR-vLQmK-sNR0 26.¤f4 ¥f5 27.¥d5 ¦d2 28.f3 ¤f6
xiiiiiiiiy 29.¥b3 ¥c2 30.¦e2 ¦xe2 31.¤xe2
7.¥e3 £h5 A provocative move. ¦c8 Black keeps up the pressure so
White decides to give up a pawn but
4...¤c6 5.¤c3 d6 6.0–0 ¥g7 7.h3 Guarding 17.¥xg7 ¢xg7 18.¥xd5 exd5 19.£g5
g4 makes the game easier for White.
The xiiiiiiiiy
white queen leaps in: Black has few Viktor Stoyanov – Robert Eames
defenders on the kingside.
4NCL Online S3 Div1 2020 lichess.org INT (4.14)
19...f5 If 19...f6 20.¤h5+ ¢h8 21.¤xf6
£g7 22.¤g4 £xb2 23.£xd5 with an 1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5
advantage for White. XIIIIIIIIY
9rsnlwqkvl-tr0
20.¤h5+ ¢h8 21.¤f4
XIIIIIIIIY 9zp-+pzppzpp0
9r+-+-tr-mk0 9-+-+-sn-+0
9+lwq-+-+p0 9+pzpP+-+-0
9p+n+-+p+0 9-+P+-+-+0
9+-+p+pwQ-0 9+-+-+-+-0
9-zp-+-sN-+0 9PzP-+PzPPzP0
9+-+P+N+P0 9tRNvLQmKLsNR0
9-zPP+-zPP+0 xiiiiiiiiy
4.cxb5 a6 5.e3 Restrained but good,
9tR-+-+RmK-0 allowing the white king’s bishop to capture
xiiiiiiiiy on b5.
Now Black is weak on the kingside and the
white knights have good squares. 5...¥b7 6.¤c3 £a5 7.¥d2 axb5 8.¥xb5
XIIIIIIIIY
21...£f7 22.£h6 ¦ae8 23.¤g5 £g8 9rsn-+kvl-tr0
24.¦ae1 ¤d8
XIIIIIIIIY 9+l+pzppzpp0
9-+-snrtrqmk0 9-+-+-sn-+0
9+l+-+-+p0 9wqLzpP+-+-0
9p+-+-+pwQ0 9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+p+psN-0 9+-sN-zP-+-0
9-zp-+-sN-+0 9PzP-vL-zPPzP0
9+-+P+-+P0 9tR-+QmK-sNR0
9-zPP+-zPP+0 xiiiiiiiiy
8...£b6 9.¤f3 ¤xd5 10.a4 £g6 10...¤f6
9+-+-tRRmK-0 appears best, trying to stop White’s play.
xiiiiiiiiy
296 | BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE
May 2021
11.0–0 White has a big advantage in 22.£b6 is very strong here attacking
development. the queen’s bishop.
11...e6 12.a5 White advances his passed 22...¢h8 23.¥e2 £h6 24.¤e5 £f6
pawn, making life difficult for Black. 25.¦ad1 ¤c5 26.¤c4 ¤xe4 27.¤xe4
12...¤b4 13.e4 ¥xe4 28.¤d6 ¥d5 29.¤xc8 ¦xc8
XIIIIIIIIY 30.¦d2 ¦a8 31.£d6 Black can play...£g5
but then White has ¦xd5, simplifying to a
9rsn-+kvl-tr0 won ending.
9+l+p+pzpp0
1–0
9-+-+p+q+0
9zPLzp-+-+-0
9-sn-+P+-+0 Now a game from Round five featuring a
traditional kingside pawn storm in a Pirc.
9+-sN-+N+-0
9-zP-vL-zPPzP0 Arjun Pyda – Christof Sielecki
9tR-+Q+RmK-0 4NCL Online S3 Div1 2021 lichess.org INT (5.83)
xiiiiiiiiy
Blocking the long diagonal and impeding 1.e4 d6 2.d4 ¤f6 3.¤c3 g6 4.¤f3 ¥g7
Black’s development. 5.¥e2 0–0 6.0–0 a6
Openings
for Amateurs By Pete Tamburro; ptamburro@aol.com
The CARO-KANN
with 1.e4 and 2.c4, Part III
Grigory Levenfish – Simon Alapin [B10] coordinate well together. The queen’s knight
can also decide to go to b6 for the eventual
All Russian Ch Budapest, 1912 recapture of the d5 pawn.
We are now going to look at the more 6.¤c3 a6 7.¥e2!
popular ¤f6 lines in response to 4.cxd5. I XIIIIIIIIY
picked a great teaching game, which is the
seminal game with this opening. The main 9r+lwqkvl-tr0
point of the game for me was Levenfish’s 9+p+nzppzpp0
approach. It’s especially valuable for
amateurs because White has an attitude 9p+-+-sn-+0
reflected in his moves that students of the 9+-+P+-+-0
game should think more about. 9-+-+-+-+0
1.c4 Yes, you can get to the Caro-Kann 9+-sN-+-+-0
through the English! 9PzP-zPLzPPzP0
1...c6 2.e4 d5 3.exd5 One small note. You 9tR-vLQmK-sNR0
don’t take with the c-pawn, because after xiiiiiiiiy
3.cxd5 cxd5 you can’t play the Panov- 7.£a4 is also played, as is the bishop
Botvinnik Attack with c4. exchange on d7. However, Levenfish’s move
fascinates me because I believe he’s telling us
3...cxd5 4.cxd5 ¤f6 Clearly better than something: the position is intrinsically good,
taking with the queen. Minor pieces should so you don’t have to do anything sharp. As
be initiating the struggle in the centre, you see him develop, you see his contentment
unless, of course, there is some immediate to get active play for all his pieces. You don’t
tactical reason to make an exception. have to go crazy to attack right away just
because your opponent is somewhat cramped.
5.¥b5+ The other main alternative is
5.£a4+. 7...¤b6 It’s hard for Black to avoid the
urge to get that annoying pawn back.
5...¤bd7 By a majority of about two to White doesn’t care. He just goes about his
one, the move of choice in this position over business as mentioned above.
5...¥d7. It makes sense. Black would like
to have White exchange the bishop for the Wild is 7...b5 8.¤f3 b4 9.¤a4 ¥b7 10.d4
knight, or, if not, chase it with a6 and b6 and ¤xd5 11.¤c5 ¤xc5 12.dxc5 £a5 13.¤e5
put the B on b7. Also, since fianchettoing ¦d8 (13...£xc5) 14.¥h5 g6 15.£f3 b3+
often appears as a black strategy, the knights 16.¥d2 £xd2+ 17.¢xd2 ¤f4+ 18.¢c1
18.¤xe6!! While focusing on defending f7, 25.¤xa7 ¦ad8 The knight isn’t going
Black forgot the other common threat of anywhere, and you can’t take it anyhow
IQP positions--the sac on e6. It’s still not because of £e5.
simple, though. Levenfish could not make
this sacrifice unless he saw it right to the 26.¥b3 ¥g6 27.£f3 ¥b6 28.£xb7 ¦8d7
decisive moment. Can you? Don’t peek! 29.£b8+ ¦d8 30.¤c8 ¥a5 31.£a7 ¦8d7
32.£c5 ¥xe1 33.¤xd6
18...fxe6 19.£xe6+ ¢f8 Now, why did I XIIIIIIIIY
give a thematic sacrifice two exclamation
marks’. Well, for one, it was 1912! Also, 9-+-+-mk-+0
and key, is that he had to have seen his 24th 9+-+r+-zpp0
move and all its consequences.
9p+-sN-snl+0
20.¦c7 No brainer. 9+-wQ-+-+-0
20...¤d5 21.¥c4 It’s best to optimise all
9-+-zP-+-+0
your pieces to make your attack work. The 9+L+-+-+-0
indirect mating attack on g8 is real. 9PzP-+-zPPzP0
21...¦d6 22.£f5+ ¤f6 23.¦e1 ¥d8 9+-+-vl-mK-0
XIIIIIIIIY xiiiiiiiiy
Alapin has finally had enough.
9r+-vllmk-+0
9wqptR-+-zpp0 1–0
9p+-tr-sn-+0
9+-+-sNQ+-0 This was an auspicious beginning for this
9-+LzP-+-+0 line, but nobody rushed to pick it up. Why?
9+-+-+-+-0 People are so busy trying to find some
9PzP-+-zPPzP0 analytical edge, they are forgetting what
Levenfish had decided to value: an equal,
9+-+-tR-mK-0 freer position - the intrinsic character of
xiiiiiiiiy the battlefield that tested Black’s ability
It’s at this point I like to stop and point to find a whole series of best moves
out to a student to look closely at this coming out of a slightly cramped position.
position. All White’s pieces are in their Levenfish understood the demands of the
optimal positions. It’s either now or never position better than his opponent even
to find the closing combination. If you though the position was approximately
hesitate or pick a wrong, not precisely equal, and he won because of it. As you
calculated, concrete series of moves, you may have discovered from the previous
will lose. Levenfish figured it out back two articles, knowing potential attacking
on move 18. positions is very handy!
Problem
World
by Christopher Jones
cjajones1@yahoo.co.uk
Grandmaster of Chess Composition
Solutions are given on page 318
1
XIIIIIIIIY
9k+-+-sn-+0
9+-wQ-+-+-0
9rvL-+P+-+0
9zp-+K+-vl-0
9-+-zpL+-+0
9+n+-+-+-0
9-+-+l+-wq0
2 XIIIIIIIIY
9L+-+-wq-+0
9+-+-+-sN-0
9-+-+-+-+0
9+pzP-mkpzP-0
9-vL-+-+-+0
9+-+-+-+p0
9-sNR+nwQ-mK0
9+-+-+-+-0 9+nvlrtrl+-0
xiiiiiiiiy xiiiiiiiiy
Kabe Moen (USA) Barry Barnes (Rochester)
3 4
Mate in 2 Mate in 2
Original ORIGINAL
XIIIIIIIIY XIIIIIIIIY
9-vL-+-mKQ+0 9-+-+-+-vl0
9+-+-+-+-0 9+-+p+-+-0
9-+p+-tRP+0 9-zp-zP-+-+0
9+-+NzPpzp-0 9+-+ktr-+-0
9-+r+k+r+0 9p+-+N+ptr0
9+-zp-+Rzp-0 9+-+l+PzP-0
9-+PvlN+Psn0 9-+-zP-+L+0
9+-+L+-+-0 9mK-+-+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy xiiiiiiiiy
Abdelaziz Onkoud (France) Christopher Jones (Bristol)
Mate in 3 Helpmate in 3 - 2 solutions
Original Original
Chess enthusiasts love statistics. This month I have taken my research even further, to
ascertain who was the most effective World Champion, by collecting all the results of
games between the sixteen World Champions and working out the percentages between
them. In other words, a league table of the best against the best.
Below is the chronological Chart of World Champions’ results (in classical time limit
games only) against other World Champions whom they have played.
The game I have chosen this month is a masterpiece by the sixth World Champion, while
the puzzle shows a rare slip-up by Lasker.
Mikhail Botvinnik - Paul Keres [A29] mighty centre with d4. An alternative is the
gambit 7.d4 ¤xc4 8.e4, gaining time and
URS-chT Moscow URS (5), 28.09.1966 space at the cost of a pawn.
1.c4 ¤f6 2.¤c3 e5 3.¤f3 Avoiding 7...c5 A further plus to Keres’ choice is the
Keres’ favourite 3.g3 c6! − an example of mechanical clamping of the centre which
Botvinnik’s ad hominem preparation. minimises the scope of White’s bishops.
3...¤c6 4.g3 ¥c5 4...¥b4 is generally 8.d3 d6 9.h3 h5!?
considered more reliable.
XIIIIIIIIY
5.¤xe5 Taking a leaf from the great chess 9r+lwqk+-tr0
strategist Nimzowitsch , who liked 4.e4!? 9zpp+-+pzp-0
(the Dresden Variation) 4...¥c5; 5.¤xe5
¤xe5; 6.d4. 9-+-zp-sn-+0
9+-zp-sn-+p0
5...¥xf2+ Displacing White’s king at the
cost of the bishop pair.
9-+P+P+-+0
9+-sNP+-zPP0
6.¢xf2 ¤xe5 7.e4 9PzP-+-mK-+0
XIIIIIIIIY 9tR-vLQ+L+R0
9r+lwqk+-tr0 xiiiiiiiiy
9zppzpp+pzpp0 A seemingly logical thrust to negotiate outposts
9-+-+-sn-+0 on the kingside dark squares for Black’s
cavalry. It takes play of genius on Botvinnik’s
9+-+-sn-+-0 part to refute this plausible concept.
9-+P+P+-+0
10.¥e2 Botvinnik elects to fianchetto his
9+-sN-+-zP-0 king rather than the bishop, which had
9PzP-zP-mK-zP0 been seemingly destined for g2 ever since
9tR-vLQ+L+R0 White’s fourth move.
xiiiiiiiiy 10...¤h7 11.¢g2 h4 12.g4 ¤g5 13.¥e3
As Botvinnik notes, this Nimzowitschian ¥d7 14.£d2 Later Botvinnik was to prefer
move is designed to circumvent ...d5. Keres 14.£g1 and £f2, but to me it would appear
now hastens to stop White constructing a to make little difference.
The Charts of World Champions’ results in classical time limit games only against other
World Champions they have played. The scores are 1 point for a win; ½ a point for a draw;
0 points for a loss.
To achieve any score over 50% against a field entirely consisting of World Champions is
highly praiseworthy!
In chronological order:
1) WILHELM STEINITZ
STEINITZ’S OPPONENTS WON DRAWN LOST
Lasker 8 12 26
Anderssen 12 0 11
Zukertort 19 12 9
Total 39 24 46
This yields a total score of 51 out of a possible total of 109 games. This amounts to a points
percentage of 46.79%.
2) EMANUEL LASKER
LASKER’S OPPONENTS WON DRAWN LOST
Steinitz 26 12 8
Capablanca 2 16 6
Alekhine 3 4 1
Euwe 3 0 0
Botvinnik 0 3 1
Total 34 35 16
This yields a total score of 51.5 out of a possible total of 85 games. This amounts to a
point’s percentage of 60.59%.
3) JOSE CAPABLANCA
CAPABLANCA’S OPPONENTS WON DRAWN LOST
Lasker 6 16 2
Alekhine 9 33 7
Euwe 4 13 1
Botvinnik 1 5 1
Total 20 67 11
This yields a total score of 53.5 out of a possible total of 98 games. This amounts to a
point’s percentage of 54.59%.
4) ALEXANDER ALEKHINE
ALEKHINE’S OPPONENTS WON DRAWN LOST
Lasker 1 4 3
Capablanca 7 33 9
Euwe 26 34 18
Botvinnik 0 2 1
Total 34 73 31
This yields a total score of 70.5 out of a possible total of 138 games. This amounts to a
point’s percentage of 51.09%.
5) MAX EUWE
EUWE’S OPPONENTS WON DRAWN LOST
Lasker 0 0 3
Capablanca 1 13 4
Alekhine 18 34 26
Botvinnik 2 8 2
Smyslov 1 0 7
Tal 0 1 0
Petrosian 0 1 1
Fischer 1 1 1
Total 23 58 44
This yields a total score of 52 out of a possible total of 125 games. This amounts to a points
percentage of 41.60%.
6) MICHAEL BOTVINNIK
BOTVINNIK’S OPPONENTS WON DRAWN LOST
Lasker 1 3 0
Capablanca 1 5 1
Alekhine 1 2 0
Euwe 2 8 2
Smyslov 29 52 24
Tal 12 20 12
Petrosian 4 20 7
Spassky 1 7 0
Fischer 0 1 0
Total 51 118 46
This yields a total score of 110 out of a possible total of 215 games. This amounts to a
points percentage of 51.16%.
7) VASILY SMYSLOV
SMYSLOV’S OPPONENTS WON DRAWN LOST
Botvinnik 24 52 29
Tal 4 21 3
Petrosian 6 25 3
Spassky 3 19 5
Fischer 1 5 3
Karpov 1 10 3
Kasparov 1 11 6
Anand 0 1 0
Total 40 144 52
This yields a total score of 112 out of a possible total of 236 games. This amounts to a
point’s percentage of 47.46%.
8) MIKHAIL TAL
TAL’S OPPONENTS WON DRAWN LOST
Botvinnik 12 20 12
Smyslov 3 21 4
Petrosian 4 35 5
Spassky 6 27 9
Fischer 4 5 2
Karpov 0 19 1
Kasparov 0 9 2
Anand 0 1 0
Total 29 137 35
This yields a total score of 97.5 out of a possible total of 201 games. This amounts to a
points percentage of 48.51%.
9) TIGRAN PETROSIAN
PETROSIAN’S OPPONENTS WON DRAWN LOST
Euwe 1 1 0
Botvinnik 7 20 4
Smyslov 3 25 6
Tal 5 35 4
Spassky 10 54 11
Fischer 4 15 8
Karpov 1 12 1
Kasparov 2 1 2
Total 33 163 36
This yields a total score of 114.5 out of a possible total of 232 games. This amounts to a
point’s percentage of 49.35%.
This yields a total score of 158 out of a possible total of 313 games. This amounts to a
points percentage of 50.48%.
This yields a total score of 187 out of a possible total of 348 games. This amounts to a
points percentage of 53.74%.
This yields a total score of 91.5 out of a possible total of 183 games. This amounts to a
points percentage of 50.00%.
19.e4 h6 19...¤xe4 20.¥xe4 dxe4 21.£xe4 The next game shows Pratten mixing it with
f6 22.d5 is not clear, but it is probably a an Olympiad player in a theoretical duel.
better try than the game.
6.¥e2 ¥g7 7.0-0 0-0 8.¤b3 ¤c6 9.¥e3 8...¤h5 8...¦e8 is better.
9.¥g5 is the Alekhine Attack.
9.b4 a5 This is suspect: 9...f5 was the
9...a5 9...¥e6 10.f4 ¦c8 is the modern approach. logical continuation.
10.a4 ¥e6 11.¤d4 d5 12.¤xc6 12.exd5 10.b5 exd4 11.¤xd4 Played to stop ...c6.
had led to a short draw in the game
Spielmann – Alekhine Margate 1938. The 11...¤c5 12.¥b2 ¥d7 13.¦b1 ¦e8
text is a novelty. 14.¤b3 Exchanging off a key defender.
12...bxc6 13.e5 ¤d7 14.f4 f6 15.¥g4 14...¤xb3 15.£xb3 ¦b8 16.¦fd1 ¥f5
¥xg4 16.£xg4 fxe5 17.£e6+ ¢h8 17.¦bc1 £g5 Trying to divert attention
18.fxe5 ¤xe5 18...¥xe5 19.¦xf8+ costs from his defensive problems.
Black a piece.
18.¦d2 ¤f6 19.b6 c6 20.¦xd6 ¦xe3
19.¦xf8+ £xf8 20.¦f1 ¥f6? 20...£c8 21.¦xf6! This handy zwischenzug decides
is more combative, but by no means risk- the issue, 21.fxe3 £xe3+ 22.¢h1 ¤g4
free 21.£xe7 ¤c4 22.¥c5 and now Black gives Black counterchances.
must take care to avoid 22...¤xb2? 23.¦f7!
£g8 because of 24.¤e2! when the threat of 21...¥xf6 22.fxe3 £xe3+ 23.¢h1 ¦d8 24.¤d5
25.¦xg7 is decisive.
1-0
Black should steer for the endgame with
22...£e8! instead. Pratten did not have the chess career he
deserved, few did in the Depression, but he
21.¥d4 £c8? 21...£g8 is not as bad as, did defeat other fine players including Dr
after 22.¦xf6 exf6 23.£xf6+, Black has Aitken, Paul List, Vera Menchik, Mieses,
23...£g7 and the subsequent endgame Milner Barry, Podhorzer and Philip Wallis
24.£xe5 £xe5 25.¥xe5+ is not hopeless as well as the young Mike Basman.
for him.
The games on Britbase were initially collected
22.¦xf6 22...exf6 23.£xf6+ ¢g8 24.¥xe5 by Roger Paige and they formed the basis of
Black is quite lost. his book Wilfred Henry Pratten: − Doyen of
Hampshire chess, which was published in 2004.
1-0
Here are three more Pratten games from the
above-mentioned website for you to check out:
The next game Pratten met one of the rising - Game 77 A Rice Gambit, complete with
stars of the era. Norman Littlewood was an unsound novelty
second in the British Championship in 1963 - Game 175 A famous briiliancy
and tied second the following year. - Game 191 A Bishop’s Gambit
Endgame Studies
by Ian Watson
ian@irwatson.uk
1 XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-mK-+-+0
9+-+-+-vL-0
9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+-+-+-0
9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+-+P+-0
2
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+-sN0
9sN-+-+-+-0
9-+-+-+-zP0
9+-+-sn-+-0
9-+p+-mk-zP0
9+-+-+-+-0
9k+P+Ptr-+0 9-+-+-+-mK0
9+-+-+-+-0 9+-+-+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy xiiiiiiiiy
O. Pervakov O. Pervakov & K. Sumbatyan
Victory−75 AT 2020 Slumstrup Nielsen−45 JT 2020
3 4
win win
XIIIIIIIIY XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+-+0 9-+ksN-+-+0
9+-+pzpp+p0 9+p+q+-+-0
9-+-+-+-mk0 9-+-+-+-+0
9zP-+-+-+P0 9vLp+-+-+P0
9-zp-+-+-mK0 9-zP-+-+P+0
9+P+-+-+N0 9+-+-zP-+-0
9-+-+-+-+0 9Q+-+-tR-+0
9+l+-+-+-0 9+K+-vl-+r0
xiiiiiiiiy xiiiiiiiiy
O. Pervakov A. Stavrietsky & O. Pervakov
11th UAPA Ty 2020 11th UAPA Ty 2020
win wIN
I’ve shown some of his masterpieces in previous BCM columns, but he keeps producing
more. Here are four of his recent works, each of them a prizewinner in the tourney it was
in. They are all from 2020; he has continued composing since then, but most of his studies
take part in composing tournaments, and those often run for two years. Composing takes
lots of time, and then the tournament judge has to go very carefully through each of the
many entries, assessing their merits and drawbacks, but also analysing every alternative to
see if the study is unsound or has dual solutions. After the provisional judgement is made,
there are periods of time in which the competitors can look at their opponents’ entries and
try to find errors in them or show that there were earlier−published studies which were
similar (an ‘anticipation’). Not until all that is over does the judgement become final and
the prizes are then awarded. Study composers are patient people.
Let me explain what the publication details mean. Composing competitions sometimes
mark a special event, and the first study is from a tourney that commemorated the
victory in WW2, the 75 AT meaning 75th Anniversary Tourney. The second marks the
45th birthday of another leading modern composer, Steffen Slumstrup Nielsen, the JT
being Jubilee Tourney. The third and fourth are from a tourney (Ty) held by the Argentine
Chess Problemist Association, the UAPA. Many tourneys have a win−study section and a
draw−study section, with separate prizes for each; this also had a third section which was a
‘thematic’ one. The theme that was required, in the studies entered for this section, was a
win study in which a minor piece dominates another minor piece. Our third study won the
top prize in this thematic section, so you have a clue to the solution, although I think it’s
fairly obvious from the position that that must happen.
We start with a miniature (seven pieces or less). When submitting their entries to a tourney,
composers sometimes submit comments on their studies, in addition to submitting the
position and the solution and analysis; occasionally, tourney judges overlook some aspect
of the study’s theme, so this can be helpful to them. Pervakov’s on this study: “two
excelsiors (slow and fast) in two echo lines with bishop sacs in miniature form.” (An
‘excelsior’ is when a pawn advances all the way from its starting square to promotion.)
On the second study, the judge wrote: “This is an absolute masterpiece.” and “The climax
is just amazing.” It features a promotion to a knight, with the three knights outdoing
Black’s new queen. Enough hints - try number four without.
Hardinge Simpole
is delighted to announce
the publication of
Fifty Shades
of Ray
Chess in the year of the
Coronavirus Pandemic
Raymond D. Keene
With an Introduction
by CJ de Mooi
Inspired by both Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Grandmaster Ray Keene OBE has enjoyed
Plague Year (1722) and The King, an anthology of a career which spans many aspects of
the witty and provocative chess columns of the chess, including numerous victories in
Dutch Grandmaster, Jan Hein Donner, Ray Keene international competitions across five
here collects his thoughts and writings on the year continents, organisation of three world
2020 - both in chess and the wider world. His chess championships involving Garry
reflections include the impact of Covid-19 on the Kasparov, creation of the first ever world
popularity of chess, the remarkable influence of the championship in any Mind Sport between
Netflix series ‘The Queen’s Gambit’, the growing a human and a computer (Dr Marion
army of teenage Grandmasters, the online pivot Tinsley v Chinook in draughts, London
of chess competition and the emergence of chess 1992) and the world record authorship
entrepreneurs, such as World Champion Magnus of 204 books on Mind Sports, thinking
Carlsen and Grandmaster Hikaru Nakamura. and genius, with translations into sixteen
Like Donner, Ray uses chess as a metaphor for different languages.
observations on art, culture and civilisation.
Hardinge Simpole,
an imprint of Zeticula Ltd.,
304 pages Published 20 April 2021 Unit 13, 196 Rose Street,
Edinburgh, EH2 4AT,
Paperback ISBN 978-1-84382-229-5
United Kingdom
£16.95 US$25.00 €22.50 AU$35.00 www.hardingesimpole.co.uk
BvR NvB
1. e3 ¦xf3 2.¥d4 ¢a3 3.c3 ¢b3 4.e4 1.¤f2 ¥c2 2.a6 ¥xb3 3.¤g4+ ¢g7
¢c4 5.¢d7 ¦f1 6.e5 ¢d5 7.e6 ¦b1 4.¤e3 ¥a4 5.¤f5+ ¢f6 6.¤d4 b3 7.a7
8.e7 ¦b7+ 9.¢d8 ¢d6 10.¥e5+ ¢xe5 b2 8.a8£ b1£ 9.£h8 mate. The knight
11.e8£+ wins, or 2…¦f7 3.c4 ¢b3 4.c5 dominates the bishop − by moving like
¢c4 5.c6 ¢d5 6.c7 ¢d6 7.¥c5+ ¢xc5 the bishop! It goes diagonally f2−e3−d4,
8.c8£+ wins. Two splendidly−echoed lines. while the bishop goes c2−b3−a4.
1.c4? ¦xe2 2.c5 ¦c2 3.¥f8 ¦f2 4.c6 ¦xf3 This is a clear−cut study, the only sideline
draws. (After 1.e3) 1…¦xc2 2.f4 ¢b3 3.f5 being 7…¥c6 8.¤xc6 b2 9.a8£ b1£
¦f2 4.f6 ¦f3 5.e4 ¢c4 6.e5 ¢d5 7.¢e7 10.£h8+ ¢e6 11.£e5 mate.
¦a3 8.f7 ¦a7+ 9.¢f6. In the first main
line there are: 5.e5? ¢d5 6.¢d7 ¦f7+;
5…¦f7+ 6.¢d6 ¦h7 7.e5; 6.¢d6? ¦a1 Stavrietsky & Pervakov
7.e5 ¦a6+ 8.¢d7 ¢d5; and 9…¦b8+
10.¢c7 ¦a8 11.¢d7. In the second main 1.¦c2+ ¥c3+ 2.¦c1 £h7+ 3.e4 £xe4+
line: 6…¦f8+ 7.¢e7 ¦g8 8.¢d7. 4.£c2 ¦h2 5.¤xb7 £h7 6.¤d6+ ¢b8
7.¥c7+ ¢a8 8.£e4+ £xe4+ 9.¤xe4
¦b2+ 10.¢a1 ¦c2+ 11.¤xc3 wins. Part
Pervakov & Sumbatyan of the point of this study is a thematic try
in the main line: 5.¤f7? £h7 6.¤d6+
1.h7 c3 2.¤c6 ¤f3+ 3.¢h3 ¤g5+ 4.hxg5 ¢b8 7.¥c7+ ¢a8 8.£xh7 ¦b2+ 9.¢a1
c2 5.¤d4 c1£ 6.¤e2+ ¢xg5 7.¤f7+ ¦c2+ 10.¢b1 ¦b2+ draws.
¢g6 8.h8¤+ ¢h5 9.¤g3 mate.
The hardest move to find is 3.e4, which
To properly appreciate this, you need to is played to induce the black queen to
see that there are two significant tries (a the e4 square where it can eventually
‘try’ is a move that almost works, failing be forked. 3.£c2? ¦h2 4.£f5+ £xf5+
to only one black reply). There’s the subtle 5.gxf5 ¦b2+ 6.¢a1 ¦c2+ 7.¢b1
try 1.¢h3? c3 2.¤b5 c2 3.¤d4 c1¤ 4.¤c6 ¦b2+ draws.
¤cd3 5.h7 ¢f5 6.¤g6 ¤f7 draws. There is
also a thematic try in the main line 5.¤b4?
c1£ 6.¤d3+ ¢xg5 7.¤f7+ ¢g6 8.h8¤+
¢h5 9.¤xc1 stalemate.
Solutions to Problems
This month’s originals
The diagrams for our three direct−mate problems this month are quite densely packed
but if you are trying to solve them I think that you will find (as with most chess
problems) that the process of finding ways in which White can threaten mate and then
ways in which Black can try to defend will begin to impose order upon the profusion
of pieces. Our last problem is a helpmate: you should look for two collaborative
BWBWBW sequences of moves which end up with Black mated. As usual, if you
don’t want to cudgel your brain trying to solve do feel free just to read on and enjoy
(hopefully!) the solutions…
A voyage of discovery
In Kabe’s 2−mover, the bishop at e4 must and 2.£e3) White must intervene on
surely be a significant player in the solution. d2, and the question, therefore, arises as
At the moment, there are no squares to to whether he should do so with the b4
which the white king can move to discover bishop or the c2 rook. Further interest
checkmate (though, by way of ‘set play’, is provided by the fact that the black
we note that if Black were obligingly to queen can potentially defend both threats
play 1…£e5+, 1…£d6+ or 1…¥c4+ simultaneously by capturing at c5, thus
captures by the white king would be mate). flighting d6 (and for good measure
In order to threaten mate, we need to play guarding e3). So we start with the try:
1.¢c6! (threat 2.£b7). Now, in order 1.¥d2. Now we have 1…¦xd2 2.£e3 and
to try to avert the threatened mate Black 1…¥xd2 2.¤d3. Further, there is 2.£(x)
does try the various checks to the white f4 after moves by the e2 knight and after
king on its new square c6 (and a defensive 1…£xc5 we have 2.£xc5. However,
move by the knight to c5) that serve to mate is impossible after 1…£xa8!. So
trigger discovered checkmates: 1…£xc7+ we turn to the key move, 1.¦d2!. Again
2.¢xc7; 1…£d6+ 2.¢xd6; 1…¥b5+ captures at d2 lead to one or other of the
2.¢xb5; 1…¦xb6+ 2.¢xb6; and 1…¤c5 threatened mates. And now the defences
2.¢xc5. We also have 1…¦a7 2.£xa7 and are, very nicely, met by different mates:
1…£h7 2.£c8. after moves of the e2 knight it’s 2.£(x)d4
and after 1…£xc5 it’s 2.£xf5.
A new tune on the organ pipes
Three-mover complexities
The configuration of the two black bishops
and two black rooks (‘organ pipes’) is a In Abdelaziz’s 3−mover we need to find
familiar meme in 2−movers. Often there a way to threaten the required mate in
are tries and a key move that intervene on three. 1.¦d3! fills the bill, because now
one of the squares jointly controlled by a after 2.£e6 and 3.£xf5 the square d5 is
rook/bishop duo (in this case, d2 and e2). guarded. And after 2.£e6 Black would
In Barry’s distinctive twist on this familiar have no effective defence - 2…¦d4
play, e2 is already occupied by a black piece, would fail to 3.¦xd4 and 2…¦f4 to
but that piece can move, activating Black’s 3.¤xg3. Two of Black’s defences at
guard on d3 and e3, the squares on which move 1 rely on threatening a check,
White mates will be threatened. In order which would prolong proceedings
to activate those threatened mates (2.¤d3 beyond move 3. So try 1…¥c1 (hoping
printed magazine
save
UK Non-UK
£55 £85
12 issues per year
postage included
subscribe
Purchase or renew your subscription and have BCM delivered to your door:
On-line: visit our website www.britishchessmagazine.co.uk
Email: contact support@britishchessmagazine.co.uk, we’ll get back to you right away
By post: write to BCM at Albany House, 14 Shute End, Wokingham, Berkshire, England
RG40 1BJ with a cheque payable to British Chess Magazine Limited, your post and email
addresses (and if possible a contact phone number)
Save time, go on-line. It’s more convenient and better for the environment, why not do it
on-line. Enjoy priority support. No waiting for your turn, we are here for you 24/7. Anytime,
anywhere. If you’re on the move, read digital BCM from your handheld or other device.
Thank you for your continuing support!
BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE, the World’s Oldest Chess Journal