Sample Rubrics
Sample Rubrics
Sample Rubrics
Rogers, G. (Oct. 2006). Rubrics: What are they good for? Part II. ABET’s CommunityMatters. Retrieved from
http://sites.psu.edu/objectives/wpcontent/uploads/sites/26668/2015/04/Holistic-Rubric-Example.pdf
2|Sample Rubrics
1 2 3 4
Abstract/Summary Several major aspects of the Abstract misses one or more major Abstract references most of the major Abstract contains reference to
experiment are missing, student aspects of carrying out the aspects of the experiment, some minor all major aspects of carrying
displays a lack of understanding experiment or the results details are missing out the experiment and the
about how to write an abstract results, well-written
Introduction Very little background Some introductory information, but Introduction is nearly complete, missing Introduction complete and
information provided or still missing some major points some minor points well-written; provides all
information is incorrect necessary background
principles for the experiment
Experimental Missing several important Written in paragraph format, still Written in paragraph format, important Well-written in paragraph
procedure experimental details or not missing some important experimental details are covered, some format, all experimental
written in paragraph format experimental details minor details missing details are covered
Results: Figures, graphs, tables contain Most figures, graphs, tables OK, All figures, graphs, tables are correctly All figures, graphs, tables are
errors or are poorly constructed, some still missing some important drawn, but some have minor problems or correctly drawn, are numbered
data, figures, graphs, have missing titles, captions or or required features could still be improved and contain titles/captions.
tables, etc. numbers, units missing or
incorrect, etc.
Discussion Very incomplete or incorrect Some of the results have been Almost all of the results have been All important trends and data
interpretation of trends and correctly interpreted and discussed; correctly interpreted and discussed, only comparisons have been
comparison of data indicating a partial but incomplete minor improvements are needed interpreted correctly and
lack of understanding of results understanding of results is still discussed, good understanding
evident of results is conveyed
Conclusions Conclusions missing or missing Conclusions regarding major points All important conclusions have been All important conclusions have
the important points are drawn, but many are misstated, drawn, could be better stated been clearly made, student
indicating a lack of understanding shows good understanding
Appearance and Sections out of order, too much Sections in order, contains the All sections in order, formatting generally All sections in order, well-
formatting handwritten copy, sloppy minimum allowable amount of good but could still be improved formatted, very readable
formatting handwritten copy, formatting is
rough but readable
Adapted from Winona State University. Rubric for assessing lab reports. Retrieved from https://course1.winona.edu/shatfield/air/No%20Carolina%20assess_lab_rubric.doc
4|Sample Rubrics
Rubric to Assess Presentational Writing Task: “Visiting Monuments in Paris” in a French Language and Culture Course
Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition at the University of Minnesota. Task-specific rubric for a presentational writing task: “Visiting monuments in Paris” –
intermediate level. Retrieved from http://carla.umn.edu/assessment/vac/improvement/p_5.html
5|Sample Rubrics
Generates Learning Within the Posts do not attempt to elicit Posts attempt to elicit responses and Posts elicit responses and reflections
Community responses and reflections from other reflections from other learners. from other learners and responses
(30%) learners and/or responses do not Responses are build upon the ideas build upon and integrate multiple
build upon the ideas of other learners of other learners to take the views from other learners to take the
to take the discussion deeper. conversation deeper. discussion deeper.
Green cells indicate where minor modifications can be made to adapt the rubric to individual discussion board post assignments. Other performance criteria and
descriptions would remain the same.
Adapted from Norther Arizona University. Sample discussion rubrics. Retrieved from http://www.uwgb.edu/catl/files/workshops/business/samplerubrics.pdf
6|Sample Rubrics
Section of the PA Department of Education Certified School Nurse Rubric Proficiency-Based Rubric: used to evaluate and communicate
student progress towards achieving a proficiency or competency
(typically defined by a professional body or specialized accreditor)
*Note: This rubric lists “failing” as a level of performance. I would recommend using non-judgmental language whenever possible.
From Pennsylvania Department of Education. Rubric assessment: Certified school nurse. Retrieved from
http://www.education.pa.gov/Documents/TeachersAdministrators/Educator%20Effectiveness/Nonteaching%20Professionals/Certified%20School%20Nurse%20Rubric.
pdf