Saep 303

Engineering Procedure
SAEP-303 31 July, 2002

Engineering Reviews of Project
Proposal and Detail Design Documentation
Document Responsibility: Consulting Services Dept.
Saudi Aramco DeskTop Standards

Table of Contents
1 Scope............................................................. 2
2 Definitions...................................................... 2
3 Instructions..................................................... 4
4 Responsibilities.............................................. 7
Attachment 1 – Guidelines for Detailed

Design Reviews............................................. 9
Attachment 2 – Summary of Review
Applications.................................................. 14
Attachment 3 – e-Review Guidelines................. 15
Previous Issue: 31 December, 1996 Next Planned Update: 1 August, 2007

Revised paragraphs are indicated in the right margin Page 1 of 59
Primary contact: Coordinator, ESD on phone 874-6156
Document Responsibility: Consulting Services Dept. SAEP-303
Issue Date: 31 July, 2002 Engineering Reviews of Project
Next Planned Update: 1 August, 2007 Proposal and Detail Design Documentation
1 Scope
1.1 This Saudi Aramco Engineering Procedure (SAEP) establishes the guidelines
used by Engineering Services (ES) when conducting electronic and hard copy
formal engineering reviews of Project Proposals and Detailed Design packages
relating to capital and non-capital projects. Requests for these reviews are
initiated by Saudi Aramco Project Management (SAPMT). This SAEP does not
apply to Design Basis Scoping Papers, Project Construction Method documents,
or routine consultation.
1.2 The primary intent of a formal engineering review of Project Proposal and
Detailed Design documents is to identify noncompliance with the Standards,
Specifications, mandatory Standard Drawings, Codes and other mandatory
engineering documents applicable to the project.
Depending on the type of review (see Para. 2.3), the engineering review may
also provide a check on the engineering soundness, concepts, and calculations
used in the design. In addition, it can provide an opportunity to offer alternative
design suggestions to bring uniformity and cost effectiveness to Saudi Aramco
facilities, recognizing that the later in the project these suggestions are offered,
the more difficult it is to incorporate them.
1.3 In addition to this SAEP, other Saudi Aramco Engineering Procedures may
apply to engineering reviews of Project Proposals and Detail Design documents
(e.g., SAEP-13, "Project Environmental Assessments", SAEP-16, "Process
Computer Execution Guide", SAEP-21, "Royalty/Custody Metering Facilities
Execution Guides", etc.).
1.4 Reviews (hard copy or electronic) conducted by Engineering Services do not

relieve Saudi Aramco Project Management Team of their responsibility to
produce a design that is sound and meets all relevant Saudi Aramco, Industry,
International and National Codes and Standards.
2 Definitions
2.1 Organizations and Reviewing Entities
Engineering Departments, Engineering Services - These terms refer to all

departments reporting to the Vice President, Engineering Services.
Saudi Aramco Project Management Team (SAPMT) - The SAPMT is the Saudi
Aramco organization responsible for overall project activities. The SAPMT has
full responsibility for project design, procurement and construction.
Page 2 of 59
2.2 Review Documentation
Project Proposal - A document which establishes the detailed design scope, cost
estimate basis, and schedule for a proposed facility from the conceptual
requirements included in the Design Basis Scoping Paper. This includes the
proposed facility size and general layout and the appropriate functional and
performance specifications. Project Proposals should be of sufficient detail to
prepare a ± 10% accuracy ER estimate, provide sufficient technical information
for proponent review and (where applicable) provide sufficient information to
obtain LSTK contract bids. (Reference: SAEP-14, "Project Proposal")
Detailed Design - A set of documents used for project construction and material
procurement. Detailed Design of a facility is normally carried out after the
Project Proposal Meeting and Expenditure Request Approval (ERA).
2.3 Review Types
Conceptual Review - A general review including a random, spot check of the

engineering soundness, concepts and calculation methods used in the design.
Areas identified as being deficient will be pointed out.
Standards Compliance Review - Compliance with applicable Saudi Aramco,

Industry, International and National Codes and Standards will be examined.
Any detected deviations will be referenced by the specific standard and
paragraph number, if feasible.
Comprehensive Review - A combination of a Conceptual Review and a

Standards Compliance Review.
Special Review - All applicable calculations, drawings and specifications will be

subjected to a thorough review. If requested by the SAPMT, Engineering
Services will provide assistance to rectify specific known or suspected design
deficiencies.
Technical Review Team (TRT) Review - A review carried out by a TRT.

Usually the TRT is a multi-disciplinary team that will go to the design
contractors' offices to review and discuss the design with SAPMT and the design
contractor. A TRT review is usually a Comprehensive Review.
2.4 Review Methods
Engineering reviews are generally organized based on one of the two following
methods:
Across-the-Board Review (ABR) - This is a review simultaneously carried out

by all involved engineering disciplines.
Page 3 of 59
Discipline Specific Review (DSR) - This is a review carried out by a specific

engineering discipline. Attachment 1 provides general guidelines and other
details for this review method.
These methods may be accomplished by routing hardcopy documents or by

utilizing an electronic review process whereby engineering review agent (s)
conduct a review at their PC desktops. Refer to Attachment 3 "e-Review
Guidelines" for information and resources when conducting an electronic
engineering review.
3 Instructions
3.1 Number, Type, and Method of Reviews (See Attachment No. 2)
3.1.1 The SAPMT is responsible for establishing the number, type, and
method of engineering reviews required for each project.
a) Project Proposals generally require a Comprehensive Review.
b) Detailed Design Reviews for Lump Sum (LS) and Lump Sum
Procure-Build (LSPB) contracts generally require a Comprehensive
Review.
c) Detailed Design Reviews for Lump Sum Turnkey (LSTK)

contracts generally require a Standards' Compliance Review.
3.1.2 Unless agreed otherwise, the Project Proposal Review shall be performed
on the completed project proposal document developed as a basis for the
Technical Review Meeting.
3.1.3 SAPMT shall include in the Project Proposal the proposed number,
method, and type of the engineering reviews for the Detailed Design
phase of the project. Agreement on the anticipated number, method,
type and general time frame of reviews for Detailed Design shall be
recorded in the Project Proposal Meeting minutes.
3.1.3.1 DSRs shall be carried out at the percent completion stage

agreed to by SAPMT and ES during the Project Proposal
meeting. Suggested percent completions are given for each
discipline in Attachment 1.
3.1.3.2 ABRs shall be carried out at the overall project percent

completion stage agreed to by SAPMT and ES during the
Project Proposal meeting.
Page 4 of 59
3.1.4 For most projects, the following number of formal reviews should be
sufficient:
- one (1) Project Proposal Review, and
- one (1) Detailed Design Review
3.1.5 Some projects may not require a Detailed Design Review due to their
simplicity or repetitiveness. Others, due to their complexity, may require
an additional Detailed Design Review.
3.1.6 Depending on size and technical complexity, some projects may require
supplementary (Special and/or TRT) review(s) during the Project
Proposal or Detailed Design phase by a TRT. The need for these
review(s) shall be determined by SAPMT.
3.2 Forecasting and Requesting Engineering Reviews
3.2.1 SAPMT is responsible for achieving agreement with the appropriate

Engineering Departments on a schedule for the Project Proposal
Technical Review and for the Detailed Design Review. Generally, the
schedules should be agreed to at least 60 days prior to the anticipated
review date. When conducting an electronic review refer to the
attachment 3 "e-Review Guideline", paragraph 11 "Responsibilities" for
information regarding preparation and scheduling events.
To request engineering reviews either in the Project Proposal or the

Detailed Design phase, the SAPMT should address a letter to the
Manager(s) of the appropriate Engineering Department(s) requesting that
the review be performed. The letter should state the type of review to be
performed, the review format to be used (hard coy or electronic),
expected completion date, and the name of the SAPMT representative
responsible for coordinating the review.
When an electronic review process is to be conducted the SAPMT shall

advise the reviewing departments (agents) in advance to allow sufficient
time for the necessary equipment upgrades and training to take place
when required.
3.3 Review Schedule
3.3.1 In general, engineering reviews of Project Proposals and Detailed Design

packages require a minimum of 10 work days and 15 work days,
respectively.
Page 5 of 59
If a shorter review duration is desired, SAPMT shall arrange a mutually

agreeable review period with the appropriate Engineering Department
Manager(s).
If the time required for a review will exceed the agreed upon review
period, then the concerned Engineering Department(s) shall agree with
the SAPMT on how much additional time will be necessary to perform
the review.
3.3.2 The review period to perform a Special Review of a specific portion of a

design shall be established in advance between the SAPMT and the
appropriate Engineering Department(s).
3.4 Review Documentation
3.4.1 The following sets of documents shall be submitted to Engineering

Services. Documentation should be hard copy unless agreed otherwise.
(see Para. 3.4.4)
a) Project Proposal Review
One copy of all documents per reviewing Division.
b) Detailed Design Review
One complete design package per reviewing Division (for ABRs)

or one complete design package per reviewing discipline (for
DSRs).
3.4.2 If required, Engineering Services may request additional copies from the
SAPMT.
3.4.3 Attachment No. 1 contains guidelines regarding the documentation that

should be made available for Detailed Design Review. The first column
gives the documentation requested for both ABRs and DSRs. The
second column gives the typical percent completion for each discipline
recommended for DSRs.
3.4.4 All documents provided to Engineering Services for review should

normally be hard copy unless the review is to be conducted as an
electronic review. Text shall be on 8-½ x 11 inch sheets and drawings
can be D sized (11 x 17 inch). Larger sized drawings shall be provided
only if legibility is a problem. However, when agreed in advance
between SAPMT and Engineering Services reviewing department(s),
SAPMT may provide all typed documents in the electronic format
currently in general use by the Company. If drawings are agreed to be
Page 6 of 59
provided in electronic format they shall be in accordance with Saudi

Aramco Drafting Manual. In no case will both hard copy and electronic
copy be required.
Exception:
Hard copy documents (e.g., drawings, scope of work) may not be

required when utilizing desk top technologies (e-Review) to conduct
project reviews.
4 Responsibilities
4.1 Saudi Aramco Project Management Team (SAPMT)
The SAPMT is responsible for:
1. Obtaining agreement with Engineering Services for:

a) the timing of the Project Proposal Review
b) the number, method(s), type, timing, and required documentation for
Detailed Design Review(s).
2. Forecasting engineering reviews in advance, and notifying appropriate

Engineering Department(s) of anticipated reviews.
3. Conducting in-house preliminary reviews prior to requesting an

engineering review be performed. Ensuring the functional requirements of
the Design Basis Scoping Paper and/or Project Proposal are met. Ensuring
that the review documents have been properly checked considering the
project completion stage and do not contain errors, such as referring to
superseded or canceled Company or Industry Standards.
4. Coordinating all Engineering Services Reviews.
5. Assembling and transmitting review documents to the relevant

Engineering Department Manager(s) or their single point contact(s).
6. Providing adequate time for Engineering Services to perform the requested

review.
7. Providing any additional documents needed to assist in the review effort

(e.g., draft purchase requisitions for items of critical equipment that may
need to be issued prior to the scheduled Detailed Design Review).
8. Providing Engineering Services with a mutually acceptable electronic log

format for the presentation of their review comments.
Page 7 of 59
9. Resolving Engineering Services review comments and making available to

Engineering Services upon request the electronic log showing resolution of
comments.
10. Administer the electronic reviews so that the review process appears
seamless to the review agents.
4.2 Engineering Services
Engineering Services is responsible for:
1. Reviewing design documents within the agreed time frame.
2. Notifying the SAPMT if the review can not be completed within the period
specified by the SAPMT.
3. Providing comments and suggested alternatives where appropriate to

correct engineering deficiencies and noncompliances.
4. Recommending further reviews depending on the technical complexity of

the project and initial review findings.
5. Establishing a single point contact for the project in each Engineering

Department.
6. Providing review comments to SAPMT in the mutually acceptable

electronic format.
7. Obtain the necessary skill sets through the Information Technology (IT)
training center to conduct the e-Review.
Revision Summary
31 July, 2002 Revised the "Next Planned Update". Reaffirmed the contents of the document, and reissued
with minor/editorial changes.
Page 8 of 59
Attachment 1 – Guidelines for Detailed Design Reviews
In these tables, the first column gives the documentation requested for both ABRs and
DSRs. The second column gives details of the requested documentation as well as the
typical percent completion for each discipline recommended for DSRs.
Document Comments
Cathodic Protection Typical % completion for DSRs = 60%
1 Plot Plans Show existing and new structures

2 Design Calculations Include resistivity data
3 Details of Buried Structures Type, size, material, location
4 Vessels and Tanks Details Size, contents, foundations, grading
5 Existing C.P. Systems Details
Civil (Roads, Grading, etc.) Typical % completion for DSRs = 60%
1 Plot Plans
2 Calculations - Roads, Grading (Water run off) 100% completion
3 Foundation Location Plans
4 Site Grading Plans, Layouts, Sections, Details
5 Foundation Drawings, including details
Communications Typical % completion for DSRs = 90%.
1 Scope of Work
2 Drawings
3 Project Plan
4 Material List
Control Systems Typical % completion for DSRs = 80%.
1 P&IDs
2 DCS Block Diagrams
3 Logic Diagrams
4 Cause and Effect Diagrams If there is ESD
5 Control Rooms and PIB Rooms
6 Hardware Material List (Preliminary list)
7 DCS Schematics (Preliminary List)
8 Instrument Loop Diagrams
9 Estimated I/O Summary Tables
10 Structured Wiring Design
11 Architecture Design
12 Man-Machine Interface Design
13 Reporting Design
14 Advanced Control Design
15 Sequence Control Design (e.g.: OMSB)
Page 9 of 59
Attachment 1 (Cont'd)
Document Comments
Electrical Typical % completion for DSRs = 30%.
1 Electrical Area Classification Drawings Showing plan and section views

2 Material Specifications for major electrical equipment Transformers, motors, switchgear, motor
control centers, UPS, medium voltage
(i.e., >1000 V) switches
3 One Line Diagrams (Overall) Showing all equipment ratings
4 One Line Diagrams (Substation) Showing all major equipment ratings
(continuous KVA/HP/current, short circuit,
interrupting, transformer impedance),basic
protective relaying, circuit breaker and/or
normal switching positions
5 Substation Drawings Plan views showing equipment layout inside
and outside the building, external elevations
of building
6 System studies which form the basis of the equipment Should include:
ratings shown on the one line diagrams - load flow
- short circuit
- motor starting
Environmental Engineering Typical % completion for DSRs = 60%.
1 Scope of Work
2 Plot Plans
3 PFDs
4 P&IDs
5 Calculations For any equipment with an environmental
emission
6 Environmental Impact Assessment All Reviews
7 Corrosion Control Plan
Geotechnical Typical % completion for DSRs = 30%.
1 Scope of Geotechnical Investigation

2 Geotechnical Report
3 Foundation Types and Load Indications
4 Earth Work Plans and Specifications
5 Construction Procedures for Special Projects i.e.: evaporation ponds and quay walls
Page 10 of 59
Document Comments
HVAC Typical % completion for DSRs = 60%.
1 P&IDs
2 Specifications
3 Calculations
4 System Diagrams
Instrumentation Typical % completion for DSRs = 30%.
1 PFDs Samples (for DSR only)

2 P&IDs Samples
3 Instrument Installation Schedules Samples
4 Instrument Specification Sheets One sample for each different instrument
5 Console/Panel/Rack Drawings (C/P/R) Only General Layouts
6 Instrument Interconnection Wiring Diagrams Samples for JBs, Marshaling cabinets, C/P/R
drawings
7 Layouts Instrument Points and Lines Samples
8 ESD System Drawings Samples of Cause and Effect, Basic Logic
Diagram and ESD Logic Narrative
9 Equipment Protection System Drawings Samples of Basic Logic Diagram, and Logic
Narrative
10 Instrument Loop Diagrams Sample for each different Loop Template
11 System Block Diagram Full set, should be completed at the start of a
project
12 Logic Diagrams and Logic Narrative for Batch or Samples
Sequential contro
Materials & Corrosion Control Typical % completion for DSRs = 30%.
1 Scope of Work Submit for background information

2 Process Flow Diagrams Submit for background information
3 P&IDs Submit before POs are issued
4 Material Specifications Submit before POs are issued
5 Equipment Data Sheets Submit before POs are issued
6 Corrosion Control Plan
Page 11 of 59
Document Comments
Paints & Coatings Typical % completion for DSRs = 50%
1 PFDs Specify temperature, pressure and fluid

composition for internal coatings. Specify
temperature for external coatings. Specify
insulation, if any.
2 Material Specifications and Equipment Data Sheets Identify which metallurgies are specified
3 Coating "Map" Identify which coatings are specified for which
services.
Piping Typical % completion for DSRs = 70%.
1 P&IDs
2 Scope of Work
3 Piping Material Specifications
4 Plot Plans
5 Piping Plans, Layouts, Sections, Details
6 Isometrics
7 Piping Support Details
8 Calculations
9 Safety Instruction Sheets At least 90% complete.
10 Hydrostatic Test Diagrams
Plant Management Systems Typical % completion for DSRs =60%
1 Installation & Commissioning Plan

2 Architecture Design
3 Application Design
4 Human Interface Design
5 Integration Design
6 Computer Room(s) Design
7 Structured Wiring Design
8 Development Plan
9 Boundary Specification
Plumbing & Utilities Typical % completion for DSRs = 60%.
1 P&IDs
2 Material Specs
3 Plot Plans
4 Hazardous Area Classifications
5 Calculations
6 Layout Drawings, Sections, and Details
Page 12 of 59
Document Comments
Process Typical % completion for DSRs = 30%.
1 Scope of Work
2 Project Description (including Utility, Catalyst and
Chemical Treatment)
3 Plot Plans
4 PFDs
5 P&IDs
6 Equipment Data Sheets
7 Cause & Effect Diagrams
Rotating Equipment Typical % completion for DSRs = 90%.
1 PFDs
2 P&IDs
4 Purchase Specifications If available or applicable
5 Design Criteria Process Description
Structural Typical % completion for DSRs = 90%.
1 Scope of Work 100% completion

2 Plot Plans 100% completion
3 Calculations, including concrete foundations 100% completion
4 Foundation Location Plans 100% completion
5 General Structural Drawings 90% completion
6 Detailed Structural Drawings, including connections
and foundations 90% completion
Note: The review of structural steel shop drawings or matrial take-off's is not considered part of the normal
structural design package review.
Valves Typical % completion for DSRs = 80%.
1 P&IDs
2 Material Specs
3 Piping Layout Or location of vertical valves
Vessels, Heat Exchangers & Boilers Typical % completion for DSRs = 20% .
1 P&IDs
Welding Typical % completion for DSRs = 90%.
1 Material specs and equipment data sheets Include thicknesses and materials
2 Welding Specs
Page 13 of 59
Attachment 2 – Summary of Review Applications
Detailed Design
Project Proposal LSTK LSPB LS
Number of reviews (typical) 1 1 1 1
Review Type
Conceptual (Note 1)
Std. Compliance X
Comprehensive Review X (Note 1) X (Note 1) X (Note 1)
Special (Note 2) (Note 2) (Note 2) (Note 2)
Technical Review Team (Note 2) (Note 2) (Note 2) (Note 2)
Review Method
Across-the-Board X X X X
or
Discipline Specific X X X
Recommended percent completion Final draft used at (Note 3)
at the of review TR meeting
Note 1 A Comprehensive Review is a combination of Conceptual Review and Standards Compliance Review.
Note 2 See Para. 2.3 for definition.
Note 3 If an Across-the-Board review method is used, the overall design percent completion will be as agreed between SAPMT
and Engineering Services. If a Discipline Specific Review method is used, see Attachment No. 1 for discipline typical
progress completion guidelines.
Page 14 of 59
Attachment 3 – e-Review Guidelines
Table of Contents
Page
1. Scope 16
2. Applicable Documents 16
3. Terms and Definitions 16
4. Hardware/Software Requirements 17
5. Drawing Preparation 18
6. Document Preparation 18
7. QA/QC For e-Review Submittals 18
8. e-Review Roles and Workflow 19
9. Drawing/Document Disciplines 22
10. Review Notifications 22
11. Responsibilities 22
12. Operational Hours 30
13. Resources 30
14. Revision Summary 30
15. Attachments 30
Page 15 of 59
1. Scope
1.1 Saudi Aramco Electronic Engineering Review (e-Review) Process

Guidelines are to assist the user groups (SAPMT and review agents) in
conducting a quality design drawing/document review.
The purpose of this guideline is to create a resource into which useful

and necessary information can be compiled and put into a logical order
for easy access when using e-Review.
1.2 This Guideline includes but is not limited to the following material:
• Drawing Preparation/Submittal
• Document Preparation/Submittal
• Definitions
• Guideline Information
• Operational Hours
• QA/QC Check Lists
• e-Review User's Manual
• e-Review Roles and Workflow
• Minimum Hardware Requirements
2. Applicable Documents
SAEP 303 Engineering Reviews Of Project Proposal And
Detailed Design Documentation
Saudi Aramco Drafting Manual
Specification for E-review Process - Preparation of Electronic Drawings,

Documents & Transmittal Forms
3. Terms and Definitions
Documents: For the purpose of e-Review, "documents" are defined as any

electronic document files in Microsoft Office (Word, Excel or PowerPoint), or
Adobe Acrobat (.PDF) format.
Drawings: For the purpose of e-Review, "drawings" are defined as electronic

CADD drawings in Microstation file format.
Page 16 of 59
Electronic Review: A design review of electronic drawings or documents that

is conducted electronically using the e-Review system.
e-Review: The term "e-Review" encompasses all of Saudi Aramco's system for
electronic review of design drawings and documents.
e-Review Process: The process that encompasses all of the steps involved in
preparing for and conducting all of the electronic reviews for a project using the
e-Review system. These steps include submission of reviewers, software
installation, training, preparation of design packages, and actual electronic
reviews.
e-Review Roles: The roles assigned by each review agency or PMT to their
personnel who participate in e-Review. These roles, along with the e-Review
workflow system, control who may place comments, approve them, and release
them when the review is complete.
P&ID: Piping & Instrumentation Diagram
PFD: Process Flow Diagram
PICU: The Project Information Center Unit within the Project Support &
Controls Dept./Project Controls Division. PICU administers the e-Review
system.
PMT: Project Management Team, synonymous with SAPMT
ProjectWise: Bentley Systems, Inc. ProjectWise software is a document

management system used by Saudi Aramco to manage electronic drawing
reviews.
QA/QC: Quality Assurance/Quality Control.
SAPMT: Saudi Aramco Project Management Team.
Workflow: A system for electronically routing drawings for review to the

reviewers, supervisors, coordinators, and system administrators sequentially so
that each participant has the permissions necessary to do his job at the
appropriate time.
Workflow State: A step or stage in the workflow. When a drawing is in the

Reviewing state, it is available for reviewers to make comments.
4. Hardware/Software Requirements
Page 17 of 59
4.1 Minimum hardware requirements for computers used for electronic

drawing/document review:
• 200 MHz Pentium processor
• 64Mb RAM
• 30Mb free disk space on C: or D: partition
• Windows NT or Windows 2000 Professional operating system
4.2 Recommended hardware configuration for computers used for electronic

drawing/document review:
• 500 MHz processor
• 128 Mb RAM
• 30 Mb free disk space on C: or D: partition
• Dual-monitor graphics card
• 2 monitors, at least one of which should be a 21" high-resolution
monitor.
• Windows NT or Windows 2000 Professional operating system
4.3 Minimum software requirements:

• Office 2000
• Internet Explorer 5.0
5. Drawing Preparation
5.1 See the definition of "drawings" in Section 3 – Terms and Definitions.

All electronic drawings that are to be submitted for electronic review
through the e-Review system shall conform to the drafting standards set
out in the Saudi Aramco Drafting Manual. In addition, these drawings
shall conform to the standards for e-Review drawings as shown in
Section 8.1 of the Specification For e-Review Process - Preparation of
Electronic Drawings, Documents & Transmittal Forms, included in this
guideline as Attachment "A".
5.2 Each drawing review package submittal shall include a completed

electronic transmittal form prepared according to the specifications set
out in Section 8.1 of Attachment "A".
6. Document Preparation
Page 18 of 59
6.1 See the definition of "documents" in Section 3 – Terms and Definitions.

Documents shall conform to the standards for e-Review documents as
shown in Section 8.2 of the Specification For e-Review Process -
Preparation of Electronic Drawings, Documents & Transmittal Forms,
included in this guideline as Attachment "A".
6.2 Each document review package submittal shall include a document index
in Microsoft Excel format prepared according to the specifications set
out in Section 8.2 of Attachment "A".
7. QA/QC For e-Review Submittals
7.1 The PMT shall conduct a QA/QC exercise prior to forwarding an e-

Review package to PICU to ensure that drawings and documents
submitted for electronic review comply with the e-Review Specifications
included as Attachment "A" to this guideline as well as other applicable
standards such as the Saudi Aramco Drafting Manual. As an aid in this
QA/QC process, the following resources are provided:
7.2 e-Review QA/QC Checklist for Drawings: A concise step-by-step

checklist that summarizes each requirement set out in the e-Review
Specification included as Attachment "A" to this guideline along with
certain specifications from the Saudi Aramco Drafting Manual and
requirements for the Electronic Drawing Transmittal. This checklist is
included in these guidelines as Attachment "B".
7.3 e-Review QA/QC Checklist for Documents: A concise step-by-step

checklist that summarizes each requirement set out in the e-Review
Specification included as Attachment "A" to this guideline that pertains
to documents, including requirements for preparation of the document
index that shall accompany each document review submittal. This
checklist is included in these guidelines as Attachment "C".
Note: Contact the Supervisor of the PS&CD/Project Information

Center (874-7199) regarding questions related to e-Review.
8. e-Review Roles and Workflow
8.1 Drawing Review System
The e-Review Drawing Review System, which is managed using

Projectwise software, employs a workflow structure to enable access to
the drawings for users based on their roles in the electronic review.
PICU creates these roles for each participant in the system according to
the participant organizations' assignments. These assignments must be
Page 19 of 59
submitted electronically prior to any electronic reviews for a project

using the "e-Review User Nomination Form" available from PICU.
Participant organizations include both PMT and reviewing agencies.
8.1.1 Roles
8.1.1.1 In e-Review, users are always able to view drawings

(read access), but their ability to add, approve or
release comments on drawings (write access) is
determined by their role and the permissions
assigned to that role at different states in the
workflow. There are four roles in the e-Review
system. A user must be assigned to one of these
roles and may be assigned to more than one at a
time. These roles are:
• Reviewer
• Supervisor
• Coordinator
• Administrator
8.1.1.2 Role Assignments
It is the responsibility of each organization

participating in e-Review, including PMT's and
reviewing agencies, to designate the role or roles
that they wish to assign to their personnel prior to
the start of any of their electronic reviews. In
making these assignments, the organization shall
observe the following criteria:
Reviewers: Any personnel that will review

drawings and make comments on them should be
assigned a Reviewer role. A review agency can
have as many Reviewers assigned as required, and
reviewers may be members of more than one group.
Supervisors: In general there should be no more

than one active Supervisor assigned for a single unit
or group organized by discipline. Usually the
Supervisor role will be assigned to a Unit
Supervisor, Division Head or his designee.
Coordinators: The Coordinator role should be

assigned to the person that has been designated by
Page 20 of 59
his department as the single point of contact for

particular project's reviews and may be the
Coordinator for more than one project. There
should be only one active Coordinator per
department for any single project.
Administrators: The Administrator role is reserved

to e-Review System Administrators in PIC.
8.1.2 Workflow Structure
8.1.2.1 Workflow States
The workflow structure determines the permissions

that the roles have at different states in the drawing
review process. In e-Review, workflows are
comprised of four states that are executed
sequentially. These states are:
Reviewing - drawings under review, comments

added.
Approval - Supervisor checks/approves his unit's

comments
Release - Department Coordinator officially releases

comments
Archive - Administrator passes comments to PMT.
8.1.2.2 Permissions
Permissions for user roles may be different for each

state in the workflow structure. The permissions
that each role has during each of the workflow states
are as follows:
State Role Permissions

Reviewing Reviewer CAN add comments to drawings
CAN NOT revise others' comments
CAN advance drawings to next state in workflow
Supervisor CAN add comments to drawings
CAN revise others' comments
Coordinator View Only
Administrator ALL
Approval Reviewer View Only
Page 21 of 59
Supervisor CAN add comments to drawings

CAN revise others' comments
OR send drawings back to Reviewing state
Administrator ALL
Release Reviewer View Only
Supervisor View Only
Coordinator CAN add comments to drawings
CAN NOT revise others' comments
OR send drawings back to Approval state
Administrator ALL
Archive Reviewer View Only
Supervisor View Only
Administrator ALL
8.2 Document Review System
The e-Review Document Review system is a web-based system that does

not employ either roles or workflow at present. However, it is
recommended that document comments be approved by the same
Supervisors/Coordinators as the drawing comments prior to their release.
9. Drawing/Document Disciplines
Drawings and documents are classified by discipline according to the Saudi

Aramco drawing index system as defined in the Saudi Aramco Drafting Manual.
In the e-Review workflow structure, drawings are routed to the reviewing
agencies based on the drawing indexes that each agency elects to review. Each
review agency shall list the drawing indexes that it will review using the
electronic form "e-Review User Nominations" available from PIC.
• Attachment "D" – Saudi Aramco Drawing Indexes, contains a list of these

indexes and their definitions.
• Attachment "E" – Drawing Types and Indexes, contains a list of the standard
drawing types and their abbreviations used in Saudi Aramco, along with
their indexes.
10. Review Notifications
Notifications of a review will only be sent to the Coordinators and Supervisors

of reviewing agencies when a review package has been received that contains
drawings or documents with indexes that the agency has specified that it wants
to review.
Page 22 of 59
Commentary Note:
If a specific review only contains Index "T" communications drawings, then only
the reviewing agencies that have indicated that they wish to review Index "T"
drawings will be notified of the review.
11. Responsibilities
11.1 Saudi Aramco Project Management Team (SAPMT)
11.1.1 The following is a list of responsibilities that the SAPMT(s)

must adhere to in order to successfully conduct an electronic
review:
11.1.1.1 Design Packages
Design packages shall:
• Comply with SAEP-303
• Include a cover sheet as specified in SAEP-303

with detailed information regarding the review
package, including a list of the percentages of
completion for each discipline.
Commentary Note:
Review packages, i.e., electrical, civil, are to

be completed to the percentages specified for
review of that discipline prior to submittal.
• Have a title for each review package, i.e.,

"HDGP Process 1 @ 30%".
• Have all of the necessary design drawings and/or

documents that have an association between
them in order to conduct a review for a specific
engineering discipline. For example, Cause-
and-Effect instrumentation drawings rely
heavily on references to P&ID drawings, Basic
Logic Diagrams and Narratives (written
explanation of the logic steps) and any review of
such instrumentation drawings must include all
of the references as well.
• Shall not send packages that convey a piecemeal

approach to the review content.
Page 23 of 59
Commentary Notes:
Example of a complete design package of a

building:
• Scope of Review
• Drawing indexes R, Q, M
• Structural calculations for all of the
structural elements: load derivations,
structural modeling & analysis, and design
of each structural element such as beams,
columns, footings, etc.
Example of a piecemeal approach for the

same building:
• Drawing index R by itself.
• Later, drawing indexes R & Q and/or M for
the building frames with complete
structural calculations for the frames.
• Then, drawing indexes R & Q for the
foundations with complete calculations for
the foundations.
• Shall not send packages that are duplications of

other design drawings (e.g., a facility may have
two substations that are identical with the only
difference being their locations.
Drawings and Documents
The terms "Drawings" and "Documents" are defined

with respect to e-Review in Sections 3 of this
document.
In general, "Drawings" consist of engineering

design drawings, while "Documents" may include
Scopes of Work, Material Take-Offs, Specifications,
Calculations, Equipment Data Sheets, etc.
Drawings and Documents submitted for e-Review

shall meet certain criteria regarding file format and
transmittal information. The attached e-Review
Technical Specification sets out these requirements
and shall be included in any contract for design
services where e-Review is to be used to conduct an
electronic review.
Page 24 of 59
11.1.1.2 Point of Contact
There must be a representative from each SAPMT

who is designated as a single point of contact and
who will serve as the Coordinator for all e-Review
activities between the SAPMT and the Project
Information Center e-Review System
Administrators. The Coordinator shall resolve /
coordinate issues that review agents may have
concerning project submittals (drawings /
documents).
11.1.1.3 QA/QC Plan/Procedure
The SAPMT representative (e.g., Coordinator) shall

see that all e-Review submittals have been reviewed
to ensure that they:
• Have been reviewed and comply with the

preparation specifications.
• Comply with the preparation procedures and that

the design contractor has followed the QA/QC
steps detailed in the checklists (Attachments "B"
and "C");
• Are complete with all supporting documentation

(e.g., design calculations, associated drawings);
• Comply with the percentage of completion

specifications as required by SAEP-303;
• Comply with the Saudi Aramco Drafting

Manual.
11.1.1.4 e-Review Schedule
11.1.1.4.1 The SAPMT shall provide a schedule

to the PICU and the review agencies
that accurately reflects the following:
• SAPMT is responsible for

achieving agreement with the
appropriate reviewing agencies on
a schedule for the Project Proposal
Page 25 of 59
Technical Review and for the

Detailed Design Review. The
schedules shall be agreed to at least
60 days prior to the anticipated
review date per SAEP-303.
• The date that a design package will

be forwarded to the PICU (for the
creation of the electronic review).
• The date that the electronic review

is to begin and close for the Review
Agents.
Commentary Note:
These dates shall comply with

the dates that have been agreed
to by the review agencies and/or
SAEP-303, unless otherwise
notified in writing.
• An estimate of the number and type

of electronic drawings and
documents that will be transmitted
for each single package to be
reviewed.
11.1.1.4.2 Schedule confirmation and changes
• The SAPMT must negotiate

agreement for any deviation from
the ten (10) and fifteen (15) day
(excluding weekends and holidays)
review cycle mandated by SAEP-
303 with the reviewing agents and
notify PICU of this agreement.
Otherwise, PICU will notify the
reviewers that the review will close
at the close of business on the tenth
(10th) working day for project
proposal packages and the fifteenth
(15th) working day for detailed
design packages following the date
the review is initiated, as per
SAEP-303.
Page 26 of 59
• SAPMT shall confirm the date for

delivery of a review package with
PICU at least two (2) weeks (10
working days) prior to initiating an
electronic review. If confirmation
of the delivery date is not received
within this time frame, PICU will
assume confirmation of the
delivery date and schedule its
resources accordingly. Failure to
meet this date may result in a delay
to the electronic review.
• Adequate notice (a minimum of

three (3) weeks) of schedule
changes shall be provided to PICU
and review agents.
• An extended review period will be

provided for in the event of an e-
Review system outage where
access to the documentation has
been denied to the reviewers. This
extended time should be equal the
amount of time that the review
documents were not available to
reviewers.
11.1.1.5 Comments Resolution
The e-Review system does not include a process to

resolve comment issues between the review agent
and PMT(s). Therefore, the normal methods /
processes of resolving comments between the
PMT(s) and the review agents has not changed and
should be handled in the normal fashion. Refer to
SAEP-303 for information regarding the resolution
of comments between PMT(s) and review agents.
11.1.2 Contractor Design agency
11.1.2.1 The following is a list of items that must be

accomplished by the design contractor in order to
prepare for an electronic review:
Page 27 of 59
• Strictly adhere to the Drawing Preparation

Procedures;
• Conduct QA/QC reviews in accordance with the

QA/QC Checklists (Attachments "B" and "C" to
this document) prior to submitting the design
package for review;
• Complete the Electronic Drawing Transmittal

Form" (refer to the e-Review Specification,
Paragraph 8.1.7), using the blank Access
database provided by PIC;
• Provide an electronic watermark (stamp) on

each drawing that indicates the percentage of
completion for the design package at the time of
review;
• Comply with the Saudi Aramco Drafting

Manual.
11.2 Review Agencies
The following responsibilities are required of the review agency (e.g.,

department, division, unit, group an or individual) once a commitment
has been made to conduct an electronic review.
• Identify review agents and schedule the Saudi Aramco training

course (601497) "ProjectWise User Level 1" for each reviewer, as
required, 60 days in advance of an electronic review.
• Each user is responsible for coordination with their LAN

Administration, computer Help Desk or the PICU e-Review System
Administrator to have the e-Review software (ProjectWise) installed
on his computer. This should be done no later than 30 days prior to
the beginning of an electronic review.
• The e-Review agencies/users (to include the PMT members) shall

provide PICU with the following information electronically using the
"e-Review User Nomination Form" available from PICU at least 30
days prior to a review in order to enable the creation of an account
for each of their users in the e-Review system:
- The title of the project or Job Order number that the reviewer will
participate in.
Page 28 of 59
- Complete organizational data, including Department, Division,

Unit, and Group as applicable.
- Drawing indexes that the review agency will review.
- Full user name, badge number, network login ID, office location,
contact telephone number and e-mail address.
- The user's role within his organization, i.e., Reviewer,

Supervisor, Coordinator, or a combination of these roles.
• Review agencies shall have back-up review agents, supervisors and

coordinators in the event that one of these key persons is away from
his duty assignment during a project review stage.
• Supervisors and Coordinators shall ensure that their e-mail client has
an out-of-office message configured with an alternate contact for
times when they will be unavailable so that review notifications can
be received and addressed in a timely manner.
• e-Review system problems shall be reported to the e-Review System

Administrator in the PIC.
11.3 Project Information Center
11.3.1 The Project Information Center will publish the following

information regarding each Electronic Review:
• Design package review type as per SAEP-303, paragraph
2.3;
• Complete schedule for each project's reviews;
• The schedule for each individual review;
• A description of each review;
• Support documentation for conducting an electronic
review;
• Contact information for PICU and the SAPMT(s);
• Electronic review schedule changes;
• e-Review Guideline with attachments.
11.3.2 PICU shall notify (forward SAPMT review notification) to the

review agencies two (2) weeks (10 working days) prior to the
start of an electronic review.
Page 29 of 59
11.3.3 PICU will monitor system performance and take appropriate

action to optimize it.
11.3.4 PICU will provide e-Review Administration System Support

from Saturday through Wednesday during the hours from 7:00
AM to 4:00 PM (+3 hours Greenwich Mean Time). After-
hours and holidays e-Review Administration System Support
will be provided on a call-out basis thereby providing 24/7 (24
hours per day/7 days per week) coverage.
11.3.5 PICU will notify users of any system outages due to hardware,
software, or network problems.
12. Operational Hours
12.1 Work Week
Saudi Arabia
The work week schedule for Saudi Aramco offices in Saudi Arabia is
Saturday through Wednesday during the hours from 7:00 AM to 4:00
PM (+3 hours Greenwich Mean Time), excluding company holidays as
shown on the official Saudi Aramco calendar.
12.2 Support Coverage
PICU will provide e-Review Administration System Support as detailed

in paragraph 11.3.4 above.
Information Technology will provide hardware system support 24/7. In

the event that there is a server outage due to hardware, software or
network problems during a review, additional time will be provided for
the review agencies to complete the review.
Note: Any review package delivery dates that do not fall on an in-
kingdom working day will be arbitrarily moved to the next
working day by PICU unless a prior agreement is made between
the SAPMT and PICU to begin processing that review package
on the date the SAPMT has requested.
13. Resources
ProjectWise User Training Manual: http://pic-oracle01.dha.aramco.com.sa/e-

review/EERP_Training_Manual[1].doc
14. Revision Summary
Page 30 of 59
15. Attachments
Attachment A - Specification for e-Review Process – Preparation of

Electronic Drawings, Documents, and Transmittal Forms
Attachment B - e-Review QA/QC Checklist for Drawings
Attachment C - e-Review QA/QC Checklist for Documents
Attachment D - Saudi Aramco Drawing Indexes
Attachment E - Drawing Types and Indexes
Attachment F - e-Review User Nomination Form (Sample)
Page 31 of 59
Attachment A – Specification for e-Review Process – Preparation

of Electronic Drawings, Documents and Transmittal Forms
SPECIFICATION
FOR
e-REVIEW PROCESS
PREPARATION OF ELECTRONIC
DRAWINGS, DOCUMENTS & TRANSMITTAL FORMS
Page 32 of 59
Table of Contents
Page
1. Introduction 34
2. Scope 34
3. Definitions and Acronyms 34

3.1 Defihnitions 35
3.2 Acronyms 35
3.3 Terms 35
4. Applicable Documents 35
5. Conflicts and Deviations 35
6. Responsibility 35
7. General Requirements 36
7.1 General CADD Standards 36
7.2 General CADD Procedures 36
8. Specific Requirements 36
8.1 Specific Requirements for Drawings 36
8.2 Specific Requirements for Documents 39
9. Quality Assurance 39
10. Documentation 39
Appendix A – Acrynyms and Definitions 41
Appendix B – Applicable Documents 42
Page 33 of 59
1. Introduction
1.1 The purpose of this specification is to describe the specific requirements

for transmittal of electronic drawings and documents to conform to Saudi
Aramco requirements for electronic review.
1.2 This specification and associated Saudi Aramco documents define the
minimum functional specifications and requirements for preparation of
drawings, documents and electronic transmittal forms.
1.3 DESIGN CONTRACTOR shall regard this document together with the
Saudi Aramco Drafting Manual as the basis for preparation of electronic
drawings. However, DESIGN CONTRACTOR shall have the
responsibility to bring to the attention of the COMPANY in writing any
comments, conflicts, or alterations to systems prior to implementation.
2. Scope
2.1 This section covers the requirements for preparing and transmitting
electronic drawings in accordance with the Saudi Aramco Drafting
Manual and Saudi Aramco's standards for electronic drawing review, and
preparation of electronic documents in accordance with Saudi Aramco
engineering standards and standards for electronic document review.
Saudi Aramco will use Bentley Systems ProjectWise software to
electronically review drawings prepared by DESIGN CONTRACTOR.
Saudi Aramco will use Microsoft Office 2000 Server Extensions to
enable review of electronic documents. The term "e-Review" as used in
this document will be interpreted as referring to electronic review of
drawings and documents using the Bentley Systems ProjectWise
software and Microsoft Office 2000.
2.2 DESIGN CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the quality control of

the electronic drawings necessary to ensure that these standards and
drawing preparation requirements are met.
2.3 DESIGN CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the quality control of

documents necessary to ensure that these standards and document
preparation requirements are met.
2.4 DESIGN CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the preparation of the

electronic transmittal form for each set of drawings and documents
submitted for E-Review.
3. Definitions and Acronyms
Page 34 of 59
3.1 Definitions
3.1.1 'Shall' and 'must' are used in the imperative sense.
3.1.2 'Will' is used in the imperative sense.
3.1.3 'May' is used in a permissive sense to state authority or

permission to do the act prescribed or prove the function being
defined in the prescribed manner, and the words 'no person
may…' or 'a person may not…' mean that no person is
required, authorised, or permitted to do the act prescribed, and
the words 'a …may not…' mean that the item being described
is not required, authorised, or permitted in the prescribed
manner.
3.1.4 'Includes' means 'includes but not limited to'.
3.2 Acronyms
See Appendix A for acronyms used in this document.
3.3 Terms
See Appendix A for terms used in this document.
4. Applicable Documents
See Appendix B for list of applicable documents.
5. Conflicts and Deviations
If any inconsistency or conflict exists between this specification and other

COMPANY documents, industry standards or drawings, it shall be the
responsibility of DESIGN CONTRACTOR to bring the inconsistency to the
attention of COMPANY in writing. COMPANY shall resolve the
inconsistency/conflict and shall notify DESIGN CONTRACTOR also in
writing. Conflicts with the standards listed in section 4 shall not be permitted
unless accompanied by a COMPANY pre-agreed waiver per SAEP-302.
6. Responsibility
6.1 All software and hardware items not specifically mentioned in this
specification, but necessary and required, shall be identified and
provided by DESIGN CONTRACTOR as part of this package.
Page 35 of 59
6.2 Any errors or omissions in this specification shall not absolve DESIGN
CONTRACTOR from the responsibility of providing fully functional e-
Review drawings and documents as described in this specification.
7. General Requirements
7.1 General Drawing Requirements
7.1.1 The following e-Review specifications are above and in

addition to the requirements in the Saudi Aramco Drafting
Manual and are intended to enable the use of the e-Review
software with Microstation drawings that are made in
accordance with the Saudi Aramco Drafting Manual.
Drawings that are made for e-Review will have additional
features that enable hyperlinking, geographical matching of
adjacent drawings, and will contain all drawing elements
except for the referenced border in a single design file.
7.1.2 An Electronic Drawing Transmittal Form must accompany

each batch of drawings submitted for e-Review. This form
captures all of the information required for the Saudi Aramco
form 8135 drawing transmittal form along with additional data
required for e-Review.
7.2 General Document Requirements
7.2.1 Documents for e-Review must be in either Microsoft Office

format (Word, Excel, or PowerPoint) or Adobe Acrobat (.PDF)
format.
7.2.2 Documents submitted for e-Review must be accompanied by

tables of contents as required to communicate the document
titles, book titles, section numbers, etc., as appropriate to show
the organization of the documents and their disciplines.
8. Specific Requirements
8.1 Specific Requirements for Drawings
8.1.1 DESIGN CONTRACTOR shall prepare drawings in

accordance with the Saudi Aramco Drafting Manual and as
described in this section (Specific Requirements 8.1).
8.1.2 Drawing File Name-The computer drawing file name shall use
the convention:
Page 36 of 59
AB123456.001 for drawing number AB-123456, Sheet 1

8.1.3 Where AB123456 is an eight-character name based on the

drawing number, with the first and second characters being
letters, and the next six characters being numbers.
8.1.4 Hyperlinks: Wherever a drawing makes reference to another

drawing, except in the drawing title box, the other drawing
must be referenced by the computer drawing file name using
the following convention:
The hyperlink text shall be a separate text string comprised

solely of the referenced drawing file name, i.e., it must not be
part of a larger text string even if it is physically in a line of
text in a note. For example, the note "Refer to drawing
DB123456.009 for details", must have the string
"DB123456.009" as a separate text string in the line of text.
8.1.5 The exact name used for all references to a drawing shall be
used when storing the drawing to disk.
8.1.6 This specification applies to all locations on the drawing where

a reference to another drawing is placed except in the drawing
title box. This includes, but is not limited to:
Match lines and sheet continuations
Drawing Legends
Notes and comments
Tables
8.1.7 Match Lines-When drawing have match lines, the relevant

drawings shall align when viewed together, so that the
continuation of the drawing information is aligned. This
matching shall be to scale and specific to the geographical
location of the information that is continued.
8.1.8 Reference Files-The drawings submitted for E-Review shall

have no reference files attached, except for the Saudi Aramco
border files which must be attached in accordance with the
Saudi Aramco Standards. The DESIGN CONTRACTOR shall
ensure that the reference files that may be attached to a
Page 37 of 59
particular drawing at working stages are merged with the

drawing.
8.1.9 2D-DESIGN CONTRACTOR shall ensure that the drawings

submitted for E-Review are all in 2D (two dimensional) format
as required by the Saudi Aramco Drafting Manual.
8.1.10 Level Settings- DESIGN CONTRACTOR shall ensure that the

Microstation windows attributes and level settings are
consistent for all windows (1 through 8) of the design file.
8.1.11 Electronic Drawing Transmittal Form - Saudi Aramco will

provide DESIGN CONTRACTOR with an electronic version
of the SA 8135 form for drawing transmittal in the form of a
Microsoft Access 2000 Database. DESIGN CONTRACTOR
shall submit a correctly completed Electronic Drawing
Transmittal Form with each batch of drawings submitted for E-
Review. Certain fields in the database are required while
others are optional. Two fields, the Drawing Type and the
Building Number, are not applicable for every drawing, but are
required for those drawings to which they apply. For example,
Index "A" drawings must always have a drawing type. Any
drawing that pertains to a particular building must have the
building number field filled in. The following table lists the
fields in the Electronic Drawing Transmittal Form with the
required fields specified.
1st Column 1st character of the drawing's file name: Required

2nd Column 2nd Character of the drawing's file name: Required
3rd Column The six (6) digits of the drawing's file name: Required
4th Column The sheet number (e.g., 001,002), etc. Required
5th Column Revision number Optional
6th Column Drawing index1 (e.g., AB123456) Required
7th Column Drawing Index2 (e.g., AB123456) Optional
8th Column Drawing Index3 (e.g., AB123456) Optional
9th Column Drawing Type Required If Applicable
10th Column Building Number Required If Applicable
9th Column Drawing title Required
10th Column Job order Optional
11th Column Plant No.1 Optional
12 Column Plant No.2 Optional
13 Column Plant No.3 Optional
14th Column Drawing File Name Required
The Database Structure shall not be modified.
Page 38 of 59
8.1.12 DESIGN CONTRACTOR shall produce an appropriate project

procedure, approved by Saudi Aramco, covering preparation of
drawings for e-Review, QA/QC, preparation of the Electronic
Drawing Transmittal Form, electronic transfer method, and
transmittal to Saudi Aramco.
8.2 Specific Requirements for Documents
8.2.1 Documents for e-Review must be in either Microsoft Office

format (Word, Excel, or PowerPoint) or Adobe Acrobat (.PDF)
format.
8.2.2 Where documents submitted for e-Review comprise a series of

books, the documents files must be divided into groups
according to the book structure, i.e., Process, Control &
Instrumentation, Utilities & Offsites, etc., must be grouped into
separate folders identified by the book title. Each group must
be accompanied by a table of contents in Excel format, and
there must also be a list of the books by title in Excel format.
8.2.3 Where documents submitted for e-Review are not organized

into books, a single table of contents in Excel format must
accompany the submittal.
8.2.4 Tables of contents must contain, as a minimum, the title of

each document and its electronic file name.
8.2.5 Tables of contents should contain additional data where

available for each document, such as section/document
number, drawing type if applicable, and drawing index if
applicable.
8.2.6 The electronic file name, including extension, for each

document submitted must be included in the table of contents,
i.e., a document in MS Word format that is named BE123456
would have a file name BE123456.DOC.
9. Quality Assurance
9.1 Quality Assurance shall be implemented and checklist signed off by the
QA inspector to ensure that the delivered product meets the requirements
of applicable specifications and standards.
9.2 Saudi Aramco may, at its discretion, provide software to automate

certain parts of the QA/QC process. In this event, DESIGN
CONTRACTOR will incorporate this software into its QA/QC process.
Page 39 of 59
10. Documentation
DESIGN CONTRACTOR shall submit drawings and documents for e-Review

together with the associated ELECTRONIC DRAWING TRANSMITTAL
FORM electronically or on electronic media as agreed with Saudi Aramco. If
electronic media such as a CD is used, it shall be labelled to indicate its
contents. A paper transmittal document shall accompany the electronic media,
containing additional information as follows:
DESIGN CONTRACTOR's originating engineer responsible for the drawing

submittal.
Saudi Aramco response co-ordinator
Drawing types
Reason for e-Review issue
Page 40 of 59
Appendix A - Acronyms and Definitions
Acronyms
ANSI American National Standards Institute
API American Petroleum Institute
BI Budget Item
CADD Computer aided Design and Drafting
CSA Canadian Standards Association
CENELEC European Committee for Normalization
Hz Hertz
IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
LSTK Lump Sum Turn Key
NEMA National Electrical Manufacturers Association
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
NMR Non-Material Requirements
OCC Operations Control Center in Dhahran
OCR Optical Character Recognition
PC Personal Computer
QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control
RFI Radio Frequency Interference
RP Recommended Practice
SACS Saudi Aramco CADD Standards
SADM Saudi Aramco Drafting Manual
SAES Saudi Aramco Engineering Standards
SAMA Scientific Apparatus Makers Association
SAMSS Saudi Aramco Materials System Specification
UL Underwriters Laboratory
Definitions
COMPANY Saudi Aramco
LSTK CONTRACTOR The Lump Sum Turn Key CONTRACTOR
Saudi Aramco Refers to any of the following Saudi Arabian organizations:

Aramco Services Company, Aramco Overseas Company,
Saudi Aramco
Page 41 of 59
Appendix B - Applicable Documents
The described herein shall comply with the latest edition of the references listed below
which are considered part of this specification.
Saudi Aramco
SAEP-128
SACS
SADM
Page 42 of 59
Attachment B - e-Review QA/QC Checklist for Drawings
e-Review Drawing QA/QC Checklist
Item Description Yes No

1 Drawing file name is in the format specified by Saudi Aramco Drafting
Standards, i.e.,"PP123456.001". (See e-Review Spec. 8.1.1)
2 All references to other drawings EXCEPT in the drawing title box are by
drawing file name, not drawing number. (Hyperlinks, see e-Review Spec.
8.1.2)
3 All hyperlinks to other drawings are a single text string and do not contain
any other text than the file name of the drawing that is referenced. (See e-
Review Spec. 8.1.2)
4 The filename contained in the drawing transmittal form EXACTLY matches
the actual filename under which the drawing is stored. (See e-Review
Spec. 8.1.2.2)
5 Match lines between adjacent drawings match geographically so that
drawings line up when viewed together. (See e-Review Spec. 8.1.3)
6 All reference files EXCEPT the border file have been merged into the main
drawing. (See e-Review Spec. 8.1.4)
7 All drawings are 2D drawings. (See e-Review Spec. 8.1.5)

8 All level settings and window attributes are the same for all windows of the
design files. (See e-Review Spec. 8.1.6)
9 All REQUIRED or REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE fields of the electronic
drawing transmittal form are filled in. (See e-Review Spec. 8.1.7)
Page 43 of 59
Attachment C – e-Review QA/QC Checklist for Documents
e-Review Document QA/QC Checklist
Item Description Yes No

1 Documents are all in MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint or Adobe PDF format.
(See e-Review Spec. 8.2.1)
2 If documents comprise a set of books, a table is provided in Excel 2000
format listing the book names. (See e-Review Spec. 8.2.2)
3 If documents comprise a set of books, the document files are divided into
separate folders according to the book structure and folders are named with
the book names. (See e-Review Spec. 8.2.2)
4 If documents comprise a set of books, each book has its own table of
contents in Excel format containing as a minimum the document titles and
their EXACT filenames. (See e-Review Spec. 8.2.2 and 8.2.4)
5 If documents are all part of one book, there is a single table of contents in
Excel format containing as a minimum the document titles and their EXACT
filenames. (See e-Review Spec. 8.2.3 and 8.2.4)
6 If additional data such as drawing indexes or section numbers is required
for clarity, these are contained in the table of contents. (See e-Review
Spec. 8.2.5)
7 The electronic file name of each document submitted is contained in the
table of contents and corresponds EXACTLY to the actual filename under
which the document is stored, INCLUDING EXTENSION. (See e-Review
Spec. 8.2.6)
Page 44 of 59
Attachment D – Saudi Aramco Drawing Indexes
Saudi Aramco Drawing Indexes

Index Description
A General
B Loss Prevention
C Columns
D Vessels
E Heat Exchangers
F Furnaces
G Liquid Handling Equipment
H Paints/Coatings
J Instrumentation
K Gas Handling/HVAC Equipment
L Piping
M Steel/Steel Structures
N Insulation
P Electrical Power Systems
Q Concrete
R Building Architecture
S Utility Services/Civil Works
T Communications
U Special Equipment
V Railroad and Marine
W Welding
X Cathodic Protection
Y Royalty and Custody Measurement
Z Process Computers
Page 45 of 59
Attachment E – Drawing Types and Indexes
TYPE DWG TITLE ABBR. TITLE INDEX DISCIPLINE

ABB ABBREVIATION ABBREVIATION A GENERAL
HVA A/C AUTOMATIC CONTR. SYSTEM A/C AUTO CONTR J MECHANICAL
HVA A/C PIPING DETAIL A/C PIPING DET S MECHANICAL
HVA AC DUCT FABRICATION AC DUCT FAB K MECHANICAL
HVA AC DUCT LAYOUT AND DETAIL AC DUCT DET K MECHANICAL
EWD ANALOG WIRING ANALOG WIRING J INSTRUMENT
SCH ANCHOR BOLT SCHEDULE ANCH BOLT SCH M CIVIL
PNL ANNUNCIATOR BOARD ANNUN. BOARD J INSTRUMENT
HAZ AREA CLASSIFICATION AREA CLASSIF A GENERAL
HAZ AREA CLASSIFICATION AREA CLASS B MECHANICAL
FPP AREA MAPS AREA MAP A CIVIL
SDT ASSEMBLY AND DETAIL ASSY & DET M CIVIL
FPS AUTO SPRINKLER - FIRE PROTECTION AUTO SPRINKLER S MECHANICAL
ARC BEAM SECTION BEAM SECT. Q ARCHITECTURE
MTL BILL OF MATERIAL BILL OF MTL A GENERAL
SCM BLOCK DIAGRAM BLOCK DIAG J INSTRUMENT
ARC CABINETS AND CARRIERS CAB/ CARRIERS R ARCHITECTURE
CBL CABLE AND CONDUIT LAYOUT CA & CND L/O P ELECTRICAL
CCS CABLE AND CONDUIT SCHEDULE CABLE/CND SCH P ELECTRICAL
CBL CABLE DETAIL CABLE DETAIL P ELECTRICAL
CBL CABLE LAYOUT CABLE LAYOUT P ELECTRICAL
FDN CABLE MANHOLE DETAIL CA MANHOLE DET Q CIVIL
CBL CABLE ROUTING CABLE ROUTING P ELECTRICAL
SCH CABLE RUNNING LIST CABLE LIST P ELECTRICAL
CBL CABLE TRAY DETAILS CA TRAY DET P ELECTRICAL
CBL CABLE TRAY LAYOUT CA TRAY LAYOUT P ELECTRICAL
SCH CABLE TRAY LOADING SCHEDULE CA TRAY SCH P ELECTRICAL
SDT CABLE TRAY SUPPORT DETAIL CA TRAY SUPT M CIVIL
EPD CABLE TRENCH AND DUCT BANK CA TRENCH/DUCT P ELECTRICAL
LAYOUT
CBL CABLE VAULT CABLE VAULT P ELECTRICAL
DOC CALCULATION SHEET CALC. SHEET A GENERAL
GEN CANCEL CANCELLED A GENERAL
FDN CATCH BASIN DETAIL C/BASIN DET Q CIVIL
Page 46 of 59
Attachment E – Drawing Types and Indexes (Cont'd)

CAT CATHODIC PROTECTION CATH. PROTECT X ELECTRICAL
SDT CHORD BRACING CHORD BRACING M CIVIL
EWD CIRCUIT DIAGRAM CIRCUIT DIAG P ELECTRICAL
SDT CLAMP DETAIL CLAMP DETAIL M CIVIL
COM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM LAYOUT COMM SYS L/O T INSTRUMENT
ARC CONCRETE AND WOODEN FRAME CONC/WOOD BLDG R ARCHITECTURE
BUILDINGS
FDN CONCRETE DIKE CONCRETE DIKE Q CIVIL
FDN CONCRETE RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL Q CIVIL
FDN CONCRETE SLEEPER CONC. SLEEPER Q CIVIL
CBL CONDUIT & JUNCTION BOX CND/JB ARRG'T P ELECTRICAL
ARRANGEMENT
CBL CONDUIT INSTALLATION DETAIL CND INSTL DET P ELECTRICAL
CBL CONDUIT INSTALLATION PLAN CND INSTL PLN P ELECTRICAL
ECD CONNECTION DIAGRAM CONN. DIAG P ELECTRICAL
SCH CONNECTION SCHEDULE CONN SCHEDULE P GENERAL
EQA CONSOLE ARRANGEMENT CONSOLE ARRG'T P ELECTRICAL
ANT CONSTRUCTION & PLACEMENT COMM. COMM TWR CONST M CIVIL
TOWE
ANT CONSTRUCTION AND PLACEMENT ANTENNA CONSTR M CIVIL
ANTENNA
DOC CONSTRUCTION BAR CHART CONSTR BAR SCH A GENERAL
ARC CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CONST DET Q CIVIL
KEY CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN AREA LAYDOWN AREA A CIVIL
DOC CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE CONSTR SCH A GENERAL
DOC CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE PLANNING CONST SEQ PLAN A GENERAL
FSH COVER SHEET COVER SHEET A GENERAL
DOC CRITICAL PATH METHOD DIAGRAM CRIT PATH DIAG A GENERAL
SCH CROSS CONNECT WIRE SCHEDULE CONN WIRE SCH P ELECTRICAL
SSD CROSSING BERMS AND ROADS SSD RD X-ING FENCE M CIVIL
FENCE
SSD CULVERT SECURITY SHIELD CULVERT SHIELD M CIVIL
DTA DATA COMMUNICATIONS DATA COMM. T INSTRUMENT
DAT DATA SHEET DATA SHEET A GENERAL
SDT DETAIL DRAWING DETAIL DWG M CIVIL
EWD DIGITAL SIGNAL WIRING DIGITAL W/DIAG J INSTRUMENT
ARC DOOR AND WINDOW ARRANGEMENT DOOR/W ARR'GT R ARCHITECTURE
Page 47 of 59

SCH DOORS AND WINDOWS SCHEDULE DOOR/W SCH R ARCHITECTURE
PLB DRAIN/WASTE AND VENT PIPING DRAIN/VENT PLB S MECHANICAL
DSC DRAWING CONTROL SHEET DWG CONTR. SHT A GENERAL
ABB DRAWING LEGEND DWG LEGEND A GENERAL
ABB DRAWING LEGEND AND NOTES LEGEND/NOTES A GENERAL
DSC DRAWING STATUS CONTROL DWG STATUS A GENERAL
SDT DUCT SUPPORT DUCT SUPPORT M CIVIL
DUP DUPLICATE DUPLICATE A GENERAL
GAP EARTH WORK EARTH WORK S CIVIL
HAZ ELECTRICAL AREA CLASSIFICATION ELEC A/CLASSIF P ELECTRICAL
EDT ELECTRICAL ASSEMBLY ELEC. ASSY P ELECTRICAL
EDT ELECTRICAL DETAIL ELEC. DET P ELECTRICAL
EDT ELECTRICAL LAYOUT ELEC. LAYOUT P ELECTRICAL
E1L ELECTRICAL ONE LINE DIAGRAM ONE LINE DIAG P ELECTRICAL
EDT ELECTRICAL PLAN ELEC. PLAN P ELECTRICAL
ELM ELEMENTARY DIAGRAM ELEM. DIAG P ELECTRICAL
ARC ELEVATION ELEVATION R ARCHITECTURE
ARC ELEVATION, SECTIONS AND DETAILS ELEV/SECT/DET R ARCHITECTURAL
ARC ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS EL & SECT R ARCHITECTURE
LTG EMERGENCY LIGHTING SYSTEM EMER LTG SYS P ELECTRICAL
PLB EQUIP.AND SANITARY FIXTURE LIST FIXTURE LIST S MECHANICAL
SDT EQUIPMENT ANCHORAGE DETAIL EQUIP ANCHOR M CIVIL
EQA EQUIPMENT ARRANGEMENT EQUIP ARRG'T A MECHANICAL
EQD EQUIPMENT ASSEMBLY EQUIP ASSY A MECHANICAL
EQD EQUIPMENT ASSEMBLY AND DETAILS EQUIP ASSY DET C MECHANICAL
EQD EQUIPMENT ASSEMBLY AND DETAILS EQUIP ASSY DET D MECHANICAL
EQD EQUIPMENT ELEVATION AND DETAILS EQUIP ELEV DET A MECHANICAL
EQD EQUIPMENT ELEVATION AND SECTION EQUIP EL/SECT A MECHANICAL
FDN EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION DETAIL EQUIP INSTALL Q MECHANICAL
EQA EQUIPMENT LAYOUT EQUIP LAYOUT A MECHANICAL
EQA EQUIPMENT LEGEND EQUIP LEGEND A MECHANICAL
DOC EQUIPMENT LIST EQUIPMENT LIST A GENERAL
EQA EQUIPMENT LOCATION PLAN EQUIP LOC PLAN A MECHANICAL
Page 48 of 59

ISS EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATION EQUIP SPEC A GENERAL
SDT EXPANSION JOINTS DETAIL EXPAN JOINT Q CIVIL
ARC EXTERIOR FINISH DETAIL EXT.FINISH DET R ARCHITECTURE
SDT FABRICATION DETAIL FAB DETAIL A MECHANICAL
SDT FABRICATION DETAIL FAB DETAIL M CIVIL
FSH FACE SHEET FACE SHEET A GENERAL
KEY FACILITY INDEX MAP FAC INDEX MAP A CIVIL
FPP FACILITY PLOT PLAN FAC PLOT PLAN A MECHANICAL
SDT FENCE AND GATE DETAIL FENCE/GATE DET M CIVIL
SDT FENCE DETAIL FENCE DETAIL M CIVIL
IPD FIELD MOUNTING DETAIL FIELD MTG DET J INSTRUMENT
ARC FINISH SCHEDULE FINISH SCH. R ARCHITECTURE
FPS FIRE BREAKS AND FIRE WALLS FIRE WALLS B MECHANICAL
HAZ FIRE HAZARDOUS AREA FIRE HAZ AREA B MECHANICAL
FPS FIRE PROOFING FIRE PROOFING B MECHANICAL
FPS FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM FIRE PROT SYS S MECHANICAL
ARC FLOOR FINISHES DETAILS FL FIN. DETAIL R ARCHITECTURAL
SDT FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN M CIVIL
ARC FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN R ARCHITECTURE
FLN FLOWLINES AND TRUNKLINES F/L & T/LINES L MECHANICAL
FDN FORMWORKS FORMWORKS Q CIVIL
FDN FORMWORKS AND REINFORCEMENT FORMS & REINF Q CIVIL
DETAILS
FDN FOUNDATION DETAIL FDN DETAIL Q CIVIL
FDN FOUNDATION LAYOUT FDN LAYOUT Q CIVIL
FDN FOUNDATION LOCATION KEY PLAN FDN KEY PLAN Q CIVIL
FDN FOUNDATION PLAN FDN PLAN Q CIVIL
FDN FOUNDATION SECTION FDN SECTION Q CIVIL
SDT FRAMING DETAIL FRAMING DET M CIVIL
SDT FRAMING DETAIL FRAMING DET M CIVIL
SDT FRAMING ELEVATION FRAMING ELEV M CIVIL
SDT FRAMING ELEVATION FRAMING ELEV M CIVIL
SDT FRAMING PLAN FRAMING PLAN M CIVIL
SDT FRAMING PLAN FRAMING PLAN M CIVIL
Page 49 of 59

SDT FRAMING PLAN AND ELEVATION FRAM'G PLN/ELE M CIVIL
SDT FRAMING SECTION FRAMING SECT M CIVIL
SDT FRAMING SECTION FRAMING SECT M CIVIL
LOG FUNCTIONAL DIAGRAM FUNCT DIAG A GENERAL
ARC FURNISHING FURNISHING R ARCHITECTURE
SDT GATE PLOT PLAN AND DETAIL GATE/PLOT PLAN M CIVIL
KEY GENERAL LAYOUT PLAN LAYOUT PLAN A CIVIL
DOC GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES A GENERAL
GAP GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION GEOGRAPHIC LOC S CIVIL
GAP GEOLOGICAL SECTION GEOLOGICAL SEC S CIVIL
GAP GRADING AND PAVING GRADE&PAVING S CIVIL
PNL GRAPHIC PANEL GRAPHIC PANEL J INSTRUMENT
DOC GRAPHS AND CHARTS GRAPHS/CHARTS A GENERAL
CBL GROUNDING DETAIL GROUNDING DET P ELECTRICAL
CBL GROUNDING LAYOUT GROUNDING L/O P ELECTRICAL
CBL GROUNDING PLAN GROUNDING PLAN P ELECTRICAL
FPS HALON FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM HALON PROT SYS B MECHANICAL
EDT HANDHOLE DETAIL HANDHOLE DET P ELECTRICAL
SDT HANDRAIL DETAIL HANDRAIL DETAIL M CIVIL
HAZ HAZARDOUS AREA CLASSIFICATION HAZ AREA CLASS B MECHANICAL
PFD HEADER DIAGRAM HEADER DIAG A MECHANICAL
SCM HEAT BALANCE DIAGRAM HEAT BAL DIAG A MECHANICAL
HVA HEAT/VENTILATING & AIR HVAC K MECHANICAL
CONDITIONING
ISS HOT TAP SPECIFICATION HOT TAP SPEC A MECHANICAL
HVA HVAC CHILLED WATER AND REFR. CHILLED W & REF K MECHANICAL
PIPING
HVA HVAC CHILLED WATER PIPING HVAC WTR PIP'G K MECHANICAL
HVA HVAC DETAIL HVAC DETAIL K MECHANICAL
HVA HVAC DIAGRAM HVAC DIAGRAM K MECHANICAL
HVA HVAC DUCT SECTIONS AND DETAILS AC DUCT SECTION K MECHANICAL
HVA HVAC EQUIPMENT HVAC EQUIPMENT K MECHANICAL
HVA HVAC FLOOR PLAN HVAC FLOOR PLN K MECHANICAL
HVA HVAC LAYOUT HVAC LAYOUT K MECHANICAL
Page 50 of 59

HVA HVAC LEGEND HVAC LEGEND K MECHANICAL
HVA HVAC MATERIAL HVAC MATERIAL K MECHANICAL
HVA HVAC PLAN HVAC PLAN K MECHANICAL
HVA HVAC PLAN,SECTIONS AND DETAILS HVAC PLAN & DET K MECHANICAL
HVA HVAC SECTION HVAC SECT K MECHANICAL
HVA HVAC SYMBOLS AND LEGEND HVAC SYM & LEGD K MECHANICAL
HGR HYDROGRAPHIC MAP HYDROG MAP A CIVIL
HYD HYDROSTATIC TEST DIAGRAM HYDROST DIAG A MECHANICAL
FSH INDEX SHEET INDEX SHT J INSTRUMENT
DOC INSPECTION RECORD INSP RECORD A GENERAL
ILD INST LOOP DIAG ILD J INSTRUMENT
IPD INSTRUMENT ASSEMBLY INST ASSY J INSTRUMENT
IPL INSTRUMENT CONDUIT ROUTING PLAN INST CND ROUTG J INSTRUMENT
EQD INSTRUMENT CONNECTION DETAILS INST CONN. DET J INSTRUMENT
SCH INSTRUMENT CONNECTION SCHEDULE INST CONN SCH J INSTRUMENT
IDT INSTRUMENT DETAIL INST DETAIL J INSTRUMENT
DOC INSTRUMENT INSPECTION SCHEDULE INSTR INSP SCH A INSTRUMENT
IPD INSTRUMENT INSTALLATION DETAIL INST INSTL DET J INSTRUMENT
IIS INSTRUMENT INSTALLATION SCHEDULE INST INSTL SCH J INSTRUMENT
IDT INSTRUMENT LAYOUT INST LAYOUT J INSTRUMENT
IPD INSTRUMENT LAYOUT INST LAYOUT J INSTRUMENT
IPL INSTRUMENT LOCATION AND CONDUIT INST LOC & CND J INSTRUMENT
IPD INSTRUMENT LOCATION PIPING INST LOC PIP'G J INSTRUMENT
IPL INSTRUMENT LOCATION PLAN INST LOC PLAN J INSTRUMENT
FDN INSTRUMENT MANHOLE DETAIL INST. M/H DET Q CIVIL
IPD INSTRUMENT MOUNTING DETAIL INST MTG DET J INSTRUMENT
PNL INSTRUMENT PANEL INST PANEL J INSTRUMENT
IPD INSTRUMENT PIPING DETAIL INST PIP'G DET J INSTRUMENT
ISO INSTRUMENT PIPING ISOMETRIC VIEW ISO INST PIP'G L MECHANICAL
IPD INSTRUMENT PLAN INST PLAN J INSTRUMENT
IPL INSTRUMENT POINTS AND LINES INST P/T LINES J INSTRUMENT
IPD INSTRUMENT SAMPLE PIPING INST SAM PIP'G J INSTRUMENT
IDT INSTRUMENT SECTION INST SECTION J INSTRUMENT
Page 51 of 59

IPD INSTRUMENT SECTION INST SEC J INSTRUMENT
ISS INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATION SHEET INST SPEC SHT J INSTRUMENT
INS INSULATION DETAIL INSULAT'N DET N GENERAL
FDN INTERCEPTOR PIT DETAIL INTER. PIT DET Q CIVIL
ECD INTERCONNECTION DIAGRAM INTERCONN DIAG P ELECTRICAL
ARC INTERIOR FINISH DETAIL INT.FINISH DET R ARCHITECTURE
PLB ISOMETRIC DIAGRAM ISO DIAG S MECHANICAL
E1L ISOMETRIC PIPING DETAIL ISO PIP'G DET P MECHANICAL
KEY KEY PLAN KEY PLAN A CIVIL
SDT LADDER ASSEMBLY LADDER ASSY M CIVIL
SDT LADDER DETAILS LADDER DET M CIVIL
GAP LANDSCAPING LANDSCAP'G S ARCHITECTURE
GAP LANDSCAPING AND PATIO DETAIL LANDSCAP'G DET S ARCHITECTURE
APP LAYOUT OF APPURTENANCES L/O APPURTEN'S A MECHANICAL
GAP LAYOUT OF PARKING LOT L/O PARK'G LOT S CIVIL
PLB LIFT-UP PUMP LIFT-UP PUMP G MECHANICAL
LTG LIGHTING AND GROUNDING LAYOUT LTG & GRND L/O P ELECTRICAL
LTG LIGHTING DETAIL LIGHTING DET P ELECTRICAL
LTG LIGHTING FIXTURE ARRANGEMENT LTG FIX ARRG'T P ELECTRICAL
LTG LIGHTING INSTALLATION DETAIL LTG INSTAL DET P ELECTRICAL
LTG LIGHTING LAYOUT LIGHTING L/O P ELECTRICAL
SCH LIGHTING PANEL SCHEDULE LTG PANEL SCH P ELECTRICAL
LTG LIGHTING PLAN LIGHTING PLN P ELECTRICAL
LDT LINE DESIGNATION TABLE LINE DES TABLE A MECHANICAL
MTL LIST OF MATERIAL MATERIAL LIST A GENERAL
SDT LIST OF PIPE SUPPORTS PIPE SUPT LIST M CIVIL
SCH LIST OF TIE-INS LIST TIE-INS A MECHANICAL
PNL LOCAL CONTROL PANEL LOC CONTR PNL J INSTRUMENT
KEY LOCATION PLAN LOC PLAN A CIVIL
LOG LOGIC DIAGRAM LOGIC DIAG J INSTRUMENT
DOC LUBRICATION CHARTS LUB. CHARTS A MECHANICAL
MDF MAIN DISTRIBUTION FRAME DISTR FRAME A ELECTRICAL
FDN MANHOLE DETAILS MANHOLE DET Q CIVIL
Page 52 of 59

FPP MASTER PLOT PLAN MAS PLOT PLAN A ARCHITECTURE
SDT MEMBER SCHEDULE MEMBER SCH. M CIVIL
GEN MERGED MERGED A GENERAL
DOC METER READING TABLE METER TABLE A GENERAL
DOC METERING FACTORS METER FACTORS A GENERAL
ARC MISC. DETAILS MISC. DETAILS R CIVIL
MDT MISCELLANEOUS MECHANICAL MECH DET A MECHANICAL
DETAILS
GAP MONUMENT REFERENCE MONUMENT REF. S CIVIL
MCC MOTOR CONTROL CENTER MTR CONTR CTR P ELECTRICAL
SCH NAMEPLATE DETAIL NAMEPLATE DET A GENERAL
SCH NAMEPLATE SCHEDULE NAMEPLATE SCH A GENERAL
SCM NET WORK CONFIGURATION NET WRK CONFIG A GENERAL
GEN NO OLD TITLE NO OLD TITLE A GENERAL
GEN NOT CLEAR NOT CLEAR A GENERAL
SDT OFFSHORE PLATFORMS P/F OFFSHORE M CIVIL
DOC OIL/GAS DISPATCH SYSTEM OIL/G DISPATCH A MECHANICAL
FDN OIL-WATER SEPARATOR PLAN OIL-W SEP PLAN Q CIVIL
SCM OPERATING DIAGRAM OPERAT'G DIAG A GENERAL
DOC OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS OPR INSTRUCT'N A GENERAL
SDT OPERATING STAGE OPER'G STAGE M CIVIL
ISS ORIFICE METER DATA SHEET ORIFICE DATA J INSTRUMENT
ISS ORIFICE PLATE DETAIL ORIFICE DET J INSTRUMENT
KEY OVERALL PLAN OVERALL PLAN A CIVIL
DOC PAINTING SPECIFICATION PAINTING SPEC H GENERAL
PNL PANEL ARRANGEMENT SECTION PNL ARRG'T SEC J INSTRUMENT
PNL PANEL DETAIL PANEL DETAIL J INSTRUMENT
PNL PANEL DIAGRAM PANEL DIAG P ELECTRICAL
SCH PANEL INTERCONNECTION SCHEDULE PANEL CONN SCH P ELECTRICAL
PNL PANEL LAYOUT PANEL LAYOUT J INSTRUMENT
SCH PANEL SCHEDULE PANEL SCH P ELECTRICAL
FDN PAVEMENT AND SEWER DETAIL PAV'MT/SEW DET S CIVIL
PRS PERSPECTIVE VIEW PERSPECT VIEW A GENERAL
SDT PIPE RACK DETAIL PIPE RACK DET M CIVIL
Page 53 of 59

FDN PIPE SLEEPER PLAN P/SLEEPER PLAN Q CIVIL
SDT PIPE SUPPORT DETAIL PIPE SUPPT DET M CIVIL
PRF PIPELINE ALIGNMENT P/L ALIGNMENT L MECHANICAL
PPL PIPELINE ROUTING P/L ROUTING L MECHANICAL
UTI PIPELINE ROUTING PLAN P/L ROUTE PLAN S MECHANICAL
FLN PIPELINES ROUTING P/LINE ROUTING L MECHANICAL
PID PIPING AND INSTRUMENT DIAGRAM P & I DIAG A MECHANICAL
PPL PIPING ARRANGEMENT PIPING ARRG'T L MECHANICAL
PPL PIPING ARRANGEMENT, TERMINAL PIPING TERM PT L MECHANICAL
POINTS
PDT PIPING DETAIL PIPING DET L MECHANICAL
PPL PIPING INDEX PIPING INDEX L MECHANICAL
PDT PIPING LAYOUT PIPING LAYOUT L MECHANICAL
PPL PIPING PLAN PIPING PLAN L MECHANICAL
PDT PIPING SECTION AND ELEVATION PIP'G SEC/ELEV L MECHANICAL
ARC PLAN AND DETAIL PLAN & DET R ARCHITECTURE
EQD PLAN AND DETAILS PLAN & DETAILS A MECHANICAL
ARC PLAN AND ELEVATION PLAN & EL R ARCHITECTURAL
PRF PLAN AND PROFILE PLAN & PROFILE A MECHANICAL
ARC PLAN AND SECTIONS PLAN & SECT R ARCHITECTURAL
ARC PLAN LAYOUT PLAN LAYOUT R CIVIL
KEY PLAN OF TELEPHONE MANHOLES TELE M/H PLAN T INSTRUMENT
SDT PLAN, ELEVATION AND DETAIL PLAN/ELEV/DET M CIVIL
ARC PLAN, ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS PLAN/ELEV/DET R ARCHITECTURAL
FDN PLAN, SECTION AND DETAILS PLAN/SEC & DET Q CIVIL
ARC PLAN, SECTION AND DETAILS PLAN/SEC & DET R ARCHITECTURAL
FDN PLAN/ELEVATION/SECTION PLAN/ELEV/SECT Q CIVIL
ARC PLAN/ELEVATION/SECTION PLAN/ELEV/SECT R ARCHITECTURE
SDT PLAN/SECTION/DETAIL PLAN/SECT/DET M CIVIL
ARC PLAN/SECTION/ELEVATION AND PLN/SEC/ELE/DET R ARCHITECTURE
DETAILS
SDT PLATES AND ATTACHMENT DETAIL PLATES DET M CIVIL
SDT PLATFORM ASSEMBLY P/FORM ASSY M CIVIL
SDT PLATFORM DETAILS P/FORM DET M CIVIL
SSD PLOT PLAN SSD FENCE PLOT PLN FENCE M CIVIL
Page 54 of 59

PLB PLUMBING DETAIL PLUMBING DET S MECHANICAL
PLB PLUMBING FLOOR PLAN PLMB FLR PLAN S MECHANICAL
PLB PLUMBING LAYOUT PLMB LAYOUT S MECHANICAL
PLB PLUMBING PLAN PLMB PLAN S MECHANICAL
PLB PLUMBING PLAN, SECTIONS AND PLB, SECT & DET S MECHANICAL
DETAILS
PLB PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM PLMB RISE DIAG S MECHANICAL
UTI POND DETAIL POND DETAIL S GENERAL
FPS PORTABLE SAFETY EQUIPMENT PORT SAF EQUIP B MECHANICAL
CBL POWER AND CONTROL CABLE PWR/CONT CABLE P ELECTRICAL
EPD POWER AND GROUNDING LAYOUT PWR & GNDG L/O P ELECTRICAL
EPD POWER DISTRIBUTION DIAGRAM PWR DISTR DIAG P ELECTRICAL
EPD POWER LAYOUT POWER L/O P ELECTRICAL
LTG POWER LIGHTING PWR LIGHTING P ELECTRICAL
SCM PRINCIPAL DIAGRAM PRINCPAL DIAG A GENERAL
PFD PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM P. FLOW DIAG A GENERAL
SCH PROCESS INTERFACE SCHEDULE INTERFACH SCH A GENERAL
CBL RACEWAY PLAN RACEWAY PLAN P ELECTRICAL
RAK RACK LAYOUT RACK LAYOUT M CIVIL
SDT RADIATION FENCE RADIAT'N FENCE M CIVIL
RPF RADIATION PROFILE RAD PROFILE T INSTRUMENT
RPF RADIO PATH PROFILE RADIO PATH T INSTRUMENT
STL REBAR SCHEDULE REBAR SCH Q CIVIL
ARC REFLECTED CEILING PLAN REFL CEILING PL R ARCHITECTURE
STL REINFORCEMENT DETAILS REINF DETAIL Q CIVIL
STL REINFORCING BAR SCHEDULE REINF BAR SCH Q CIVIL
SCH RELAY SETTING SCHEDULE RELAY SET SCH P ELECTRICAL
SCM RISER DIAGRAMS RISER DIAG A GENERAL
GAP ROADS AND PAVING ROADS & PAVING S CIVIL
ARC ROOF DETAILS ROOF DETAIL R ARCHITECTURAL
SDT ROOF FRAMING ROOF FRAMING M CIVIL
ARC ROOF FRAMING ELEVATION RF FRAM'G ELEV Q ARCHITECTURE
ARC ROOF FRAMING PLAN RF FRAM'G PLAN Q ARCHITECTURE
ARC ROOF PLAN ROOF PLAN R ARCHITECTURE
Page 55 of 59

EPD ROUTING OF DUCT BANK CONDUIT ROUT'G DUCT P ELECTRICAL
EWD RTD SIGNAL WIRING RTD SIG WIRING J INSTRUMENT
SSD SAFETY & SECURITY FENCE SSD FENCE M CIVIL
DIRECTIVES
SIS SAFETY INSTRUCTION SHEET S. I. SHEET A INSTRUMENT
SCH SCHEDULE SCHEDULE S GENERAL
SCH SCHEDULE OF FINISHES SCH OF FINISH R ARCHITECTURE
SCM SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM SCHEM DIAG A GENERAL
DOC SCOPE OF WORK SCOPE OF WORK A GENERAL
ARC SECTION SECTION R ARCHITECTURE
PLB SECTIONAL ELEVATION SECT. ELEV. S MECHANICAL
ARC SECTIONS AND DETAILS SECT & DET R ARCHITECTURAL
ARC SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS SECT & EL R ARCHITECTURAL
SDT SETTING OUT PLAN SETT'G OUT PLN M CIVIL
SCH SETTLEMENT CHART SETTLE CHART A CIVIL
FDN SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL SEWER M/H DET Q CIVIL
FDN SEWER MANHOLE PLAN SEWER M/H PLAN Q CIVIL
FDN SEWER MANHOLE SECTION SEWER M/H SEC Q CIVIL
ABB SIGNS SIGNS A GENERAL
GAP SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE DEV PLAN S CIVIL
GAP SITE FURNISHING SITE FURNISH'G S ARCHITECTURE
KEY SITE PLAN SITE PLAN A GENERAL
ARC SLAB SECTION AND DETAIL SLAB SEC/DET Q CIVIL
GAP SOIL INVESTIGATION SOIL INVESTIG'N S CIVIL
EQS SPECIAL EQUIPMENT SPECIAL EQUIPME U MECHANICAL
UTI SPRINKLER LAYOUT L/O SPRINKLER S MECHANICAL
SSD SSD COMPUTER GATE COMPUTER GATE M CIVIL
SSD SSD DETAIL SSD DETAIL M CIVIL
SSD SSD FENCE ELEVATION SSD FENCE ELEV M CIVIL
SSD SSD FENCE PLAN SSD FENCE PLAN M ARCHITECTURE
ARC STAIR SECTIONS STAIR SECTION R ARCHITECTURE
SDT STAIRWAY AND DETAIL STAIRWAY DET M ARCHITECTURE
SDT STAIRWAY AND DETAIL STAIRWAY DET M CIVIL
STL STEEL BENDING DETAIL STL BEND'G DET Q CIVIL
Page 56 of 59

FDN STORM WATER DISCHARGE PIT STORM DISC PIT Q CIVIL
LTG STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM STREET LTG SYS P ELECTRICAL
SDT STRUCTURAL DETAIL STRUCTURE DET M CIVIL
ARC STRUCTURE AND REINFORCEMENT STRUCT./REINF Q CIVIL
DETAILS
FLN SUBMARINE PIPELINE LAYOUT SUBMARINE P/L L MECHANICAL
CBL SUBSTRUCTURES SUBSTRUCTURES P ELECTRICAL
FSH SUMMARY SHEET SUMMARY SHEET A GENERAL
DOC SUMMARY SHEETS SUMMARY SHEETS A GENERAL
FDN SUMP PIT DETAIL SUMP PIT DET. Q CIVIL
SWG SWITCHGEAR SPEC. AND SWGR ARRG'T P ELECTRICAL
ARRANGEMENT
EWD T/C SIGNAL WIRING T/C SIG WIRING J INSTRUMENT
TAB TABULATION ELECTRICAL LOAD ELEC LOAD TAB P ELECTRICAL
CBL TELEPHONE CABLES TELE CABLES T INSTRUMENT
CBL TELEPHONE FACILITY TELEPHONE FAC. T INSTRUMENT
KEY TELEPHONE FACILITY INDEX TELE INDEX FAC T INSTRUMENT
CBL TELEPHONE LAYOUT TELEPHONE L/O T INSTRUMENT
TRM TERMINAL LAYOUT TERM LAYOUT P ELECTRICAL
ISS THICKNESS GAUGE POINTS GAUGE PT DET J INSTRUMENT
E1L THREE-LINE DIAGRAM 3-LINE DIAG P ELECTRICAL
SCH TIE-IN INDEX TIE-IN INDEX A MECHANICAL
SCH TIE-IN SCHEDULE TIE-IN SCH A MECHANICAL
FSH TITLE SHEET TITLE SHEET A GENERAL
TOP TOPOGRAPHIC AND CONTOUR MAP CONTOUR MAP A CIVIL
GAP TRAFFIC ISLAND TRAFFIC ISLAND S CIVIL
ANT TRANSMISSION LINE LAYOUT L/O TRANS LINE P ELECTRICAL
FDN TRENCH LAYOUT AND DETAIL TRENCH LAYOUT Q CIVIL
SDT TRUSS DETAIL TRUSS DET M CIVIL
FPS TYP. INSTALLATION FIRE FIGHTING SYS TYP INSTL F/F B MECHANICAL
DOC UOP STANDARD SPECIFICATION UOP STD SPEC A GENERAL
UTI UTILITY DETAIL UTILITY DETAIL S MECHANICAL
PFD UTILITY FLOW DIAGRAM UTIL FLOW DIAG A MECHANICAL
UTI UTILITY LAYOUT UTILITY LAYOUT S MECHANICAL
VOD VALVE OPERATING DIAGRAM V.O. DIAG A MECHANICAL
Page 57 of 59

SCH VALVE PACKING SCHEDULE VALVE PACK SCH A MECHANICAL
FDN VALVE PIT DETAIL VALVE PIT DET Q CIVIL
VEN VENDOR VENDOR A GENERAL
KEY VICINITY MAP VICINITY MAP A GENERAL
SDT WALKWAYS WALKWAYS M CIVIL
ARC WALL AND CEILING OPENING WALL/CLG OPEN Q ARCHITECTURE
ARC WALL DETAIL WALL DET. R ARCHITECTURE
ARC WALL SECTIONS WALL SECTION R ARCHITECTURE
ARC WINDOW AND DOOR DETAILS W/DOOR DET R ARCHITECTURE
EWD WIRING DIAGRAM WIRING DIAG P ELECTRICAL
SCH WIRING LIST WIRING LIST P ELECTRICAL
SCH WIRING SCHEDULE WIRING SCH P ELECTRICAL
IPL YARD PIPING YARD PIPING J INSTRUMENT
PPL YARD PIPING YARD PIPING L MECHANICAL
Page 58 of 59
Attachment F – e-Review User Nomination Form (Sample)
Page 59 of 59

Saep 303

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Saep 303

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Saep 303

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Engineering Procedure

SAEP-303 31 July, 2002

Saudi Aramco DeskTop Standards

Attachment 1 – Guidelines for Detailed

Previous Issue: 31 December, 1996 Next Planned Update: 1 August, 2007

1.4 Reviews (hard copy or electronic) conducted by Engineering Services do not

2.1 Organizations and Reviewing Entities

Engineering Departments, Engineering Services - These terms refer to all

2.2 Review Documentation

2.3 Review Types

Conceptual Review - A general review including a random, spot check of the

Standards Compliance Review - Compliance with applicable Saudi Aramco,

Comprehensive Review - A combination of a Conceptual Review and a

Special Review - All applicable calculations, drawings and specifications will be

Technical Review Team (TRT) Review - A review carried out by a TRT.

2.4 Review Methods

Across-the-Board Review (ABR) - This is a review simultaneously carried out

Discipline Specific Review (DSR) - This is a review carried out by a specific

These methods may be accomplished by routing hardcopy documents or by

3.1 Number, Type, and Method of Reviews (See Attachment No. 2)

a) Project Proposals generally require a Comprehensive Review.

c) Detailed Design Reviews for Lump Sum Turnkey (LSTK)

3.1.3.1 DSRs shall be carried out at the percent completion stage

3.1.3.2 ABRs shall be carried out at the overall project percent

3.2 Forecasting and Requesting Engineering Reviews

3.2.1 SAPMT is responsible for achieving agreement with the appropriate

To request engineering reviews either in the Project Proposal or the

When an electronic review process is to be conducted the SAPMT shall

3.3 Review Schedule

3.3.1 In general, engineering reviews of Project Proposals and Detailed Design

If a shorter review duration is desired, SAPMT shall arrange a mutually

3.3.2 The review period to perform a Special Review of a specific portion of a

3.4 Review Documentation

3.4.1 The following sets of documents shall be submitted to Engineering

a) Project Proposal Review

One copy of all documents per reviewing Division.

b) Detailed Design Review

One complete design package per reviewing Division (for ABRs)

3.4.3 Attachment No. 1 contains guidelines regarding the documentation that

3.4.4 All documents provided to Engineering Services for review should

provided in electronic format they shall be in accordance with Saudi

Hard copy documents (e.g., drawings, scope of work) may not be

4.1 Saudi Aramco Project Management Team (SAPMT)

The SAPMT is responsible for:

1. Obtaining agreement with Engineering Services for:

2. Forecasting engineering reviews in advance, and notifying appropriate

3. Conducting in-house preliminary reviews prior to requesting an

4. Coordinating all Engineering Services Reviews.

5. Assembling and transmitting review documents to the relevant

6. Providing adequate time for Engineering Services to perform the requested

7. Providing any additional documents needed to assist in the review effort

8. Providing Engineering Services with a mutually acceptable electronic log

9. Resolving Engineering Services review comments and making available to

4.2 Engineering Services

Engineering Services is responsible for:

1. Reviewing design documents within the agreed time frame.

3. Providing comments and suggested alternatives where appropriate to

4. Recommending further reviews depending on the technical complexity of

5. Establishing a single point contact for the project in each Engineering