Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation
Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation
Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation
Meat and poultry are perishable food- tion is responsible for reduced contami-
stuffs, and red meat has a relatively unstable nation and increased product stability.
color. Poor sanitary practices increase micro- There are many obvious reasons for main-
bial damage resulting in reduced color, fla- taining high standards of cleanliness in meat
vor, and product safety. Effective sanitation and poultry facilities. The following are a few
is essential to reduce discoloration, spoilage, that are important:
and pathogen growth with a resultant
● These products are vulnerable to attack
increase in shelf life product safety.
by microorganisms present under unsan-
Sanitation in the meat and poultry indus-
itary conditions.
try requires good housekeeping, beginning
● Microorganisms cause product discol-
with the live animal or bird and continuing
oration and flavor degradation.
through serving the prepared product. The
● Self-service merchandising of aerobi-
sanitation program should be thoroughly
cally packaged fresh meat and poultry
planned, actively enforced, and effectively
places a premium on intensive sanita-
supervised. The most successful program
tion to increase shelf life.
involves inspection by trained personnel who
● Improved sanitary conditions reduce
are directly responsible for the sanitary con-
waste because less discolored and
dition of the plant and equipment.
spoiled product has to be discarded.
● Immaculate sanitary conditions can
improve the image of a firm, whose rep-
ROLE OF SANITATION utation depends on product condition.
A sanitary product is more wholesome
Meat and poultry nourish microorganisms and superior in appearance to tainted
that cause discoloration, spoilage, and food- merchandise.
borne illness. Methods of processing and ● Increased emphasis on food nutrition
distribution are responsible for the increased and sanitation by regulatory agencies
exposure of these products to microbial con- and consumers suggests a need for an
tamination. For example, many of today's effective sanitation program.
merchandising techniques depend on appe- ● Employees deserve clean, safe working
arance to sell the product. Improved sanita- conditions. Sanitary and uncluttered
298
Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation 299
Reduced myoglobin
100
Oxymyoglobin
Total Pigment (%)
Metmyoglobin
Partial pressure of O2
of one atmosphere
in air at a pressure
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Oxygen Partial Pressure
(Millimeters of Mercury)
of the surface tissue. With high respira- tion source, the risk of this condition occur-
tion rates, reduction to myoglobin ring rises each time these products are
occurs, correlating with similar changes handled.
under controlled oxygen atmospheres. When alive, a healthy animal possesses
3. Pigment oxidation and reduction are defense mechanisms that counteract the
controlled by adjustment of oxygen entrance and growth of bacteria in the mus-
level in the storage atmosphere with a cle tissue. After slaughter, the natural
light load of microorganisms. defenses break down, and there is a race
4. Agents inhibiting high oxygen uptake between humans and microbes to determine
rates in exposed tissues preserve color the ultimate consumer. If the handling is
under atmospheric conditions but are careless and ineffective, the microbes win.
ineffective under low oxygen pressures. Those involved with sanitation must create a
less favorable environment for the microor-
These observations result in the conclu-
ganisms. (Chapter 5 discusses contamination
sion that the reduction of oxygen in muscle
sources during slaughter and processing.)
tissue by microbial growth or by physical
Approximately 1 billion microorganisms
effects can produce an increase in reduced
are contained in a gram of soil attached to
myoglobin through oxidation by metabolic
the hide of a live animal. A gram of manure
hydrogen peroxide produced by muscle tis-
contains approximately 220 million micro-
sue or by bacteria. With oxygen tension
bes. Sticking knives contaminated with bac-
reduced to a low enough level, hydrogen per-
teria introduce contamination through the
oxide formation is nil, and no oxidation will
wound. An animal's heart may beat for 2 to
occur. This condition indicates that the dis-
9 minutes after sticking, thereby permitting
sociation of the oxy compound increases as
thorough distribution of microbes. Unwas-
oxygen tension decreases. Fresh meat pig-
hed animals have approximately 155 million
ments are more vulnerable to discoloration
microorganisms/cm2 of skin where the jugu-
at oxygen tensions below that of air at
lar vein is cut.
atmospheric pressure.
Although the temperature of a scalding
Clearly, the growth of bacteria from poor
vat is approximately 60ºC, the microbial load
sanitation contributes to muscle color degra-
is approximately 1 million bacteria per liter
dation through reduced oxygen concentra-
of water. The dehairing operation for hogs is
tion and ultimate discoloration. Various
responsible for microorganisms being beaten
genera and species of microorganisms differ
into the surface skin.
in their effect on pigment alteration; how-
Contamination during evisceration of ani-
ever, improved cleanliness can delay the
mals is increased because the stomach and
development of high numbers of microbes.
intestinal contents are loaded with microor-
Those who handle meat should strive to min-
ganisms. A major contamination source for
imize the initial microbial load.
meats in the slaughterhouse is rumen fluid,
which averages 1.3 billion microorganisms
Meat and Poultry Contamination
per milliliter.
During the slaughter, processing, distribu- Carcass surface counts of microorgan-
tion, and foodservice cycle, food items are isms average 300 to 3,000/cm2. Beef and
handled frequently-often as many as 18 to 20 pork trimmings contain 10,000 to 500,000
times. Because almost anything contracting bacteria per gram, depending on contami-
meat and poultry can serve as a contamina- nation and sanitation practices, cutting
Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation 301
packaging. A significant portion of fresh control the growth of this pathogen through
meats used as raw materials for processed refrigeration at 4 to 5ºC (a common storage
products can be contaminated with this psy- temperature) because this microbe can survive
chrotrophic pathogen and point to the at a 0ºC storage environment. Doyle (1987)
importance of preventing postprocessing has suggested that the use of antimicrobial
recontamination of ready-to-eat products. agents, reduced temperature (<2ºC) storage,
Table 17–1 illustrates the incidence of reformulation of products (reduced minimum
L. monocytogenes in post-heat processing water activity [Aw], pH, etc.), or post-process-
environments in 41 meat plants. Other viable ing pasteurization of products may need to be
product contamination areas include slicers, incorporated for the control of such psy-
dicers, saws, lugs, tubs and other containers, chrotrophic pathogens in foods.
hand tools, gloves, aprons, packaging mate- Frank et al. (2003) evaluated the effective-
rials, packaging equipment, tables, shelves, ness of cleaning and sanitizing chemicals in
racks, and cleaning equipment. Other areas the removal of L. monocytogenes biofilms
where this pathogen may be hidden include coated with soil of poultry origin and applied
recesses, hollow rollers, motor housings, under static conditions without heat applica-
switch boxes, rusted materials, cracked or tion. Alkaline and neutral cleaning com-
pitted hoses and door seals, walls that are pounds were evaluated as well as sodium
cracked or pitted or covered with inade- hypochlorite, acidified sodium chlorite, per-
quately sealed surface panels, vacuum/air oxyacetic acid, peroxyacidic acid/octanoic
pressure pumps lines or hoses, air filters, acid mixture, and quaternary ammonium
open bearings, and ice makers. compound sanitizing agents. The alkaline
L. monocytogenes is often found around wet cleaning compound removed 99% of fat and
areas and cleaning aids, such as floors, drains, 93% of protein within 30 minutes. The neutral
wash areas, ceiling condensate, mops and cleaning compound was equally effective at
sponges, brine chillers, and at peeler stations. removing fat, but eliminated only 77% of pro-
Biofilm formation is exacerbated through tein. The alkali cleaning compound also effec-
older and unclean equipment with exposed tively removed L. monocytogenes biofilm
bolts and threads, and unsealed rivets. Thus, coated with protein. Biofilm removal is more
control of Listeria organisms in processing successful if cleanup is initiated as soon as
plants is essential to reduce the potential of possible after the production shift ceases.
post-processing contamination. One cannot More prompt cleaning after production
Table 17–1 Incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in Meat Plant Post-heat Processing Environments
Floors 39
Drains 39
Cleaning aids 34
Wash areas 24
Casing peelers 22
Food contact surfaces 20
Condensate 7
Walls and ceilings 5
Compressed air 4
Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation 303
reduces time for additional microbial growth raw and finished products should be sani-
and facilitates cleaning because of reduced tized each time they are used. Frequent
drying of soil deposits. Acidified sodium cleaning with floor scrubbers is essential. If
chlorite and peracetic acid/octanoic acid mix- ceiling condensate is present, removal should
ture were the most effective sanitizers for the involve a vacuum unit or a sanitized sponge
destruction of L. monocytogenes biofilm mop. Cleaned floors that do not dry before
coated with fat and protein. Figure 17–2 illus- production startup should be vacuumed or
trates how sanitizers such as those mentioned squeegeed.
can be applied to reduce contamination from Although growth niches may be present
employees and entering processing areas. in a plant, more positive sites found during
Pathogens such as L. monocytogenes can environmental monitoring are not growth
be better controlled through the reduction of niches. They are transfer points (i.e., product
cross-contamination. Employees who work handlers and equipment). Since the microor-
in the raw and finished product areas, such ganism is present in this location before the
as smokehouses and water and steam cook- product comes to the line, transfer points are
ing areas, should change outer clothing and not growth niches, because the organism is
sanitize their hands or change gloves when eliminated during the cleaning and sanitizing
moving from a raw to finished product area. process. Thus, most pathogen monitoring and
Utensils and thermometers that are used for control sampling occur at transfer points, not
Figure 17–2 Door foaming unit incorporated to reduce contamination from employees and equipment. Cour-
tesy of JohnsonDiversey Inc, Detroit, Michigan.
304 PRINCIPLES OF FOOD SANITATION
the true harborage places are growth niches 4. Floors should be surfaced with materi-
(Butts, 2003). als that are easily cleaned and will not
Growth niches should be designed out of encourage water accumulation.
the process, but if this is not accomplished 5. Prevent proliferation in growth niches
they must be managed by minimizing their or other sites that lead to ready-to-eat
contamination potential with process con- product contamination.
trol techniques. The manufacturer should
consider the degree to which equipment Process Control
needs to be disassembled for effective clean- 1. If the process does not contain a
ing and sanitizing. The chemical sanitizer L. monocytogenes kill step, the opera-
treatment being practiced, including consid- tion should be designed to reduce con-
eration of flood sanitizing coverage and the tamination.
requirements for treatment time is another 2. The kill step (if applicable) should be a
factor that will have an impact on the suc- critical control point in the Hazard
cessful control of pathogenic growth niches. Analysis Critical Control Points
Butts (2003) suggested that the flood-sanitiz- (HACCP) program.
ing step must be implemented to further 3. Implement an appropriate sampling
assure that growth niches are managed. plan to determine if the process is
The Following guidelines should be con- under control.
sidered when planning for the control of 4. Establish appropriate corrective action.
L. monocytogenes in meat, poultry, and other 5. Verify that the corrective action was
food plants. effective.
6. Review and analyze data to ensure that
Layout and Plant Design the control program is effective.
Although most modern plants are much
more hygienically designed than during the Operation Practices
past, these principles to complement those 1. Employees should be educated about
mentioned in Chapter 14, should be consid- good manufacturing practices (GMPs),
ered. HACCP, and the responsibilities of
1. Plant layout should prevent pests and each.
vermin and should control the move- 2. Equipment should be provided to
ment of L. monocytogenes between raw maintain sanitary conditions such as
and cooked product areas. Examples (a) foot baths, (b) hand dips, (c) hair
are employee traffic patterns, support nets, and (d) gloves.
and supervisory staff movement, and 3. Contamination sources, especially in
food-handling activities. ready-to-eat areas, should be elimi-
2. Air and refrigeration movement equip- nated.
ment should be designed for easy clean- 4. Management should be educated to
ing and sanitizing. Ready-to-eat areas support GMPs and HACCP.
should have a positive air pressure
Sanitation Practices
design.
3. All equipment and other surfaces 1. An adequate number of employees,
should be easily cleaned and sanitized time, and supervision should be pro-
with smooth, nonporous surfaces. vided for cleaning and sanitizing.
Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation 305
2. Written cleaning and sanitizing proce- 7. Change outer clothing and sanitize
dures should be developed and posted hands or gloves when moving from a
for each area in the plant. “raw” to a finished product area.
3. Environmental sampling programs to 8. Change into clean work clothes daily.
verify the effectiveness of cleaning and Provide some pattern of color-coding
sanitizing should be established. to designate various plant areas.
9. Minimize the number of visitors and
Verification of L. monocytogenes Control
require them to change into clean
1. A microbial assay of weekly samples clothes provided at the plant.
from plant areas, equipment, and the 10. Provide a plant environmental moni-
air supply should be conducted. It is toring program to measure effective-
especially important to sample points ness of the Listeria control procedures.
between the kill step and packaging. 11. Enclose processing and packaging
2. Samples can be composited to reduce rooms so that filtered air comes in and
the analysis cost. If a composite sample ensure that these areas are under pos-
is positive, a follow-up analysis of indi- itive pressure.
vidual samples is necessary to determine 12. Clean and sanitize all equipment and
which equipment is the contamination containers before their entry into pro-
source. cessing and packaging areas.
The following important suggestions for Three alternative levels (Lazar, 2004) of
Listeria control in meat plants should be Listeria control in a plant are:
considered: Alternative Level 3—basic control level
addressed through effective sanitation
1. Mechanically or manually scrub floors
Alternative Level 2—effective sanitation is
and drains daily. Drains should contain
combined with post-lethality treatments such
a “quat plug” or be rinsed with disin-
as heat, antimicrobial agents, or freezing
fectants daily.
Alternative Level 1—effective sanitation,
2. Clean the exterior of all equipment,
antimicrobial treatment, and a post-lethality
light fixtures, sills and ledges, piping,
treatment combining all three strategies
vents, and other areas in the processing
It has been suggested (Russell, 2003) that
and packaging areas that are not in the
28% of cattle designated for harvesting are
daily cleaning program.
infected with Escherichia coli O157:H7 and
3. Clean cooling and heating units and
that an average of 43% of beef carcasses
ducts weekly.
contain this pathogen at various stages of
4. Caulk all cracks in walls, ceilings, and
production.
window sills.
In September 2002, the U.S. Department
5. Keep hallways and passageways that
of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection
are common to raw and finished prod-
Service (USDA, FSIS) announced its plan to
uct clean and dry.
institute a series of additional measures to
6. Minimize traffic in and out of pro-
complement previous policies aimed at the
cessing and packaging areas and
prevention and control of E. coli in ground
establish plant traffic patterns to
beef. These included:
reduce cross-contamination from feet,
containers, pallet jacks, pallets, and 1. All beef harvesting and grinding plants
fork trucks. are required to acknowledge that E. coli
306 PRINCIPLES OF FOOD SANITATION
is a hazard likely to occur in their oper- bacteria are less active, and some death can
ations unless proven otherwise. occur through stress.
2. All establishments producing raw beef Processing and storage at a colder tempera-
products must reassess their mandatory ture will reduce spoilage and microbial growth
Hazard Analysis & Critical Control on equipment, supplies, or other areas. Under
Points plans and investigate the ade- unsanitary conditions with improper tempera-
quacy of existing pathogen/interven- ture control, certain species of Pseudomonas
tion controls. If controls are not in can double in number every 20 minutes. Meat
place or are determined to be inade- and poultry are generally expected to avoid
quate, a pathogen reduction step to spoilage twice as long at 0ºC than at 10ºC.
reduce the risk of E. coli O157:H7 in Air curtains should be installed, especially
the product must be incorporated into when truck doors must be left open, to pre-
the production process. vent refrigeration loss where the plant is
3. FSIS inspectors will conduct random under positive pressure. Entry of insects and
microbial verification testing of all beef dust is reduced with the use of air curtains.
grinding operations. The air velocity should be a least 488
4. FSIS will increase inspections of m/minute, measured at a distance of 910 mm
pathogen reduction and intervention above the floor. For personnel entrances, the
steps to verify that they are effective in air stream should be continuous across the
reducing the incidence of E. coli entire width of the opening, with a thickness
O157:H7 under actual plant condi- of at least 254 mm and a minimum velocity
tions. of 503 m/minute, measured 910 mm above
the floor (Shapton and Shapton, 1991).
Temperature Control
Meat and poultry spoil when held at a
high temperature. Temperature affects the SANITATION PRINCIPLES
rate of chemical and biochemical reactions,
and, especially, the lag phase of the growth An efficient cleaning arrangement can
pattern of microorganisms. The rates for reduce labor costs up to 50%. Construction
both microbial and non-microbial spoilage and equipment selection are critical for the
increase to approximately 45ºC. Microbial most effective cleaning operation. It is
spoilage usually does not occur above 60ºC. important that the floors, walls, and ceilings
(Microbial growth kinetics is discussed in be constructed of impervious material that
Chapter 3). Microorganisms grow most rap- can be easily cleaned. Floors should be
idly between 2 and 60ºC. This range is con- sloped with a minimum of 10.5 mm/m.
sidered the critical zone, or the danger zone.
Hot Water Wash
Meat and poultry must be stored out of this
temperature zone and should be taken Hot water washing of meat and poultry soil
through this range as quickly as possible is not effective. Hot water can loosen and melt
when a temperature change is necessary (as fat deposits but tends to polymerize fats, dena-
when cooking and chilling). Storage temper- ture proteins, and complicate removal of pro-
ature below the critical zone does not effec- tein deposits by binding them more tightly to
tively destroy bacteria but does reduce the the surface to be cleaned. The main advantage
rate of growth and multiplication of of a hot-water wash system is minimal invest-
microorganisms. Below the critical zone, ment of cleaning equipment. Limitations of
Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation 307
Figure 17–5 Shackle washer for cleaning shackles, The active ingredients of these cleaners
rollers, and the chain in poultry processing plants. may be sodium metasilicate, sodium hexa-
Courtesy of Ecolab Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota. metaphosphate, sodium pyrophosphate, and
Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation 309
trisodium phosphate. The addition of sul- most frequently used in sanitizing meat and
fites tends to reduce the corrosion attack on poultry operations are the following:
tin and tinned metals. These cleaners are fre-
quently used with CIP, high-pressure, and ● Sodium and calcium hypochlorite: These
other mechanized systems found in meat and are more costly than elemental chlorine,
poultry plants. but are more easily applied. Hypochlor-
ous acid is an active germicidal agent,
Mild Alkaline Cleaners
and the activity of hypochlorites is pH
Mild cleaners are frequently in solution to dependent. Alkalinity decreases as the
use for hand cleaning lightly soiled areas in germicidal activity increases.
meat and poultry plants. ● Liquid chlorine: This sanitizer is used in
processing and cooling water chlorina-
Neutral Cleaners
tion to prevent bacterial slimes.
Information about these and other clean- ● Chlorine dioxide: This is an effective
ing compounds is discussed in Chapter 9. bactericide in the presence of organic
matter because it does not react with
nitrogenous compounds. The residual
SANITIZERS FOR MEAT AND effect is also more persistent than that of
POULTRY PLANTS chlorine. However, this sanitizer needs
to be generated on-site.
To obtain maximum benefits from use of a ● Active iodine solutions, like active chlo-
sanitizer, it must be applied to surfaces that rine solutions, can be sanitizers. Iodo-
are free of visible soil. Soils of special con- phors are very stable products with
cern are fats, meat juices, blood, grease, oil, much longer shelf lives than hypochlo-
and mineral buildup. These deposits provide rites and are active at a low concentra-
areas for microbial growth, both below and tion. These sanitizing compounds are
within the soil, and can hold food and water easily measured and dispensed, and they
necessary for microbial proliferation. Chem- penetrate effectively. Their acid nature
ical sanitizers cannot successfully penetrate prevents film formation and spotting
soil deposits to destroy microorganisms. on equipment. Solution temperature
should be below 48ºC because free
Steam
iodine will dissipate.
Steam is an effective sanitizer for most ● The quaternary ammonium compounds
applications. Many operators mistake water are widely used on floors, walls, equip-
vapor for steam and fail to provide adequate ment, and furnishings of meat and poul-
exposure to create a sanitizing effect. Steam try plants. The “quats” are effective on
should not be used in refrigerated areas porous surfaces because of their penetra-
because of condensation and energy waste, tion ability. A bacteriostatic film that
and it is unsatisfactory for continuous sani- inhibits bacterial growth is formed when
tizing of conveyors. quats are applied to surfaces. Those sani-
tizers and compounds containing both an
Chemical Sanitizers
acid and a quat sanitizer are most effec-
Chlorine is one of the halogens used for tive in controlling L. monocytogenes and
disinfecting, sterilizing, and sanitizing equip- mold growth. Quats may be temporarily
ment, utensils, and water. The sanitizers used when a mold buildup is detected.
310 PRINCIPLES OF FOOD SANITATION
● Acid sanitizers combine the rinsing and tamination. Several cattle hide interventions
sanitizing steps. Acid neutralizes the are effective in a controlled laboratory set-
excess alkalinity from the cleaning ting, but may not be feasible for use on live
residues, prevents formation of alka- animals (Allen, 2004).
line deposits, and sanitizes. Acid An application for disinfectants involves a
sanitizers effectively kill both gram- reduction of bacteria on carcasses. Applica-
positive and gram-negative bacteria. tions have focused on acidified sodium chlo-
Other information about sanitizers rite (ASC), hydrogen peroxide, trisodium
may be found in Chapter 10. Sodium phosphate, cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC),
chlorite and citric acid are in use in and the application of an electrochemically
meat and poultry plants as an antimi- activated solution (ECA). ECA is a mixture
crobial (Stahl, 2004). of sodium hypochlorite and peroxides to
● Ozone is incorporated to control micro- provide an electrical process that enables it
bial contamination in water, spray to destroy a wide range of microorganisms.
directly onto meat and other foods to CPC has been successfully incorporated with
reduce microbial contamination, and lactic acid and sodium tripolyphosphate to
the application onto clean food contact destroy salmonella.
sources as a non-rinse sanitizer. It is an ASC has been approved for use on meat
excellent biocide for chill water in products as well as fruits, vegetables, and
slaughter plants and cooling tower seafood products. A commercial application
operations (Stier, 2002) because it of ASC involves 1,000 ppm after pre-chilled
breaks down to harmless compounds carcasses are water-rinsed for 10 seconds.
and will not concentrate in the system. Sodium chlorite acidifies in the presence of
Moisture must be present (80 to 90%) citric acid and destroys bacteria, viruses, fungi,
for ozone to be able to attack microor- yeast, and some protozoa by disrupting pro-
ganisms. Although ozone can reduce teins in the microbial cell. It is effective in the
pathogenic microorganisms on beef car- destruction of pathogenic bacteria. This com-
casses, Castillo et al. (2003) discovered pound can be applied at room temperature
that an aqueous ozone treatment pro- through immersion or spray techniques with-
vided no improvement over a hot water out jeopardizing product quality. It is environ-
wash. Too much ozone application on mentally friendly and can be discharged into
the meat surface will cause a pale color municipal and private sewage systems without
(Clark, 2004). additional treatment (Velazco, 2003). ASC
may be applied post-chill to reduce Campy-
lobacter spp. and E. coli in commercial broiler
Carcass and Product Decontamination
carcasses. Post-chill systems may eventually be
Cleansing of cattle prior to harvesting can used in different applications, such as mist,
reduce contamination during hide pulling. spray, or bath, which could be applied closer
Antimicrobial rinses and treatments are to the final stages in processing (Oyarzabal
common in meat and poultry plants (Anon., et al., 2004).
2004). Of the various decontamination treat- Dipping solutions of sodium diacetate,
ments reported by Allen (2004), spray wash sodium benzoate, sodium propionate, and
treatments with ethanol and 4 to 6% potassium sorbate have been incorporated to
concentrations of lactic acid was the most inhibit the growth of L. monocytogenes in
effective in the reduction of microbial con- turkey frankfurters. Gombas (2003) con-
Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation 311
cluded that 1.8% sodium lactate combined ozone, can lack effectiveness and threaten
with 0.25% sodium acetate, sodium diacetate, worker safety if not properly handled. Since
or glucono delta-lactone in frankfurters ozone gas is a toxic respiratory irritant with
inhibits the growth of this pathogen and that limited effectiveness, it has not been further
combinations of lactate with diacetate were developed (Russell, 2003). Antimicrobial
the most effective since this combination pro- resistance is another potential limitation.
vided a synergistic inhibitory effect. E. coli O157:H7 and other pathogens may be
The combination of acetic acid and hydro- capable of acid adaptation in processing
gen peroxide is effective in the destruction of plants.
listeria. Antimicrobial washes with hydrogen Carcass washes lose their efficacy if
peroxide and organic acid reduce microorgan- microbes evolve and become resistant. To
isms on carcass surfaces more effectively than reduce this threat and increase the effective-
a plain water wash because of the synergistic ness of these washes, a multi-hurdle
effect between organic acids and hydrogen approach may be incorporated through the
peroxide. Carcasses should be washed with use of more than one rinse or other preven-
hydrogen peroxide as soon as possible after tive measures. Some larger meat plants may
hide removal for maximum effectiveness and have as many as five or six hurdles including
residues should not be left on the carcasses activated lactoferrin, a non-ionic surfactant,
after treatment. Sodium citrate or sodium lac- and electrolyzed oxidizing water (EO) (which
tate at a concentration of 2% (wt/wt) or has been effective against pathogens
higher is known to inhibit Clostridium per- attached to cutting boards and as a poultry
fringens growth over and 18 hour cooling spray/dip combination).
period (Sabah et al., 2003) and citric acid with Another carcass decontamination concept
irradiation can inhibit growth of L. monocy- involves a wash cabinet with a water and
togenes (Sommers et al., 2003a). sodium hydroxide mixture, which releases
An acidified calcium sulfate solution, soils and contaminants from the hide. Then,
when applied to the surface of frankfurters, the carcass is conveyed to a second cabinet,
reduces the growth of L. monocytogenes. where it is rinsed with high-pressure water
Also, it prevents the re-growth of this before being steam vacuumed with a lactic
pathogen. acid application (Yovich, 2003). Stopforth
During the past, treatment of frankfurters et al. (2003) indicated that peroxyacetic acid
with lactic acid initially reduced the number is more effective than alkaline (quaternary
of microorganisms, but failed to kill all of ammonium) sanitizers as a decontaminant
them and prevent additional growth. Lactate and increased destruction effectiveness is
and diacetate additives and CPC are effective attained with the application of hot water
pathogen inhibitors (Petrak, 2003; Sommers and an acid wash as compared to washing
and Fan, 2003; Sommers et al., 2003b), only with water. Use of carcass washers has
although CPC has not been FDA approved increased in an effort to reduce fecal con-
for use in food manufacturing at the time of tamination (Bashor et al., 2004).
this writing. Post-packaging pasteurization Activated lactoferrin is a natural non-toxic
technology, especially through heat applica- protein that is consumer label-friendly with
tion, has provided a means to reduce no in-plant disposal challenges. It is FDA
pathogen growth. approved and a generally recognized as safe
Compounds incorporated in carcass (GRAS). This naturally occurring protein is
washes, such as acidified sodium chlorite and derived from whey and skim milk. It is the
312 PRINCIPLES OF FOOD SANITATION
Salmonella and other detrimental microor- hygienically designed and sanitized before use.
ganisms. New procedures and equipment Safe and wholesome adjuncts should be used.
modification are necessary to reduce con-
Packaging
tamination. A machine-vision system that
instantly detects trace levels of organic con- The appropriate packaging material will
tamination, including ingesta and fecal protect the product from contamination.
material which harbors pathogens, is avail- Proper storage temperatures must be main-
able and can be used in processing, distribu- tained.
tion, and retailing environments to help
Distribution
workers detect organic contamination,
ensuring a safer and more wholesome prod- The method of distribution must be rapid
uct. However, at the time of this writing a and clean. An effective temperature and san-
“track record” for this equipment was not itary environment must be maintained. The
established. transportation environment should be moni-
tored for sanitation and temperature control.
Evisceration
Intestinal spillage and viscera rupture can
occur. In poultry slaughtering, a series of SANITATION PROCEDURES
water or sanitizer sprays can be applied to
reduce contamination. Red meat carcasses Detailed cleaning operations should be
can also be decontaminated. The efficacy of written and posted in the plant. Documenta-
spraying has not been totally resolved tion of procedures is beneficial when super-
because this operation does not completely vision changes are made and for training of
remove microorganisms and can spread con- new employees. As mechanization increases,
tamination over the carcass. cleaning methods become correspondingly
more detailed and complicated. Prior to
Inspection
adopting a cleaning procedure, it is essential
A meat inspector should use a sanitizer for to become familiar with the operation of all
the hands and knife because they can con- production and cleaning equipment. In addi-
taminate dressed carcasses. tion to providing the necessary information,
this can lead to improvements in methods
Chilling
that are used or should be incorporated.
Control of chilling parameters (air tem- The following are examples of cleaning
perature, air movement, relative humidity, procedures that could be used for distinct
and filtering air) can reduce microbial operations and areas in a plant. These exam-
growth. Drying of the carcass surface is ples are only guidelines. Every cleaning
important in the suppression of microorgan- application should be adapted to the prevail-
isms (e.g., Campylobacter species). Trimming ing conditions. Although this step will not be
of the neck flap area of poultry carcasses mentioned, hoses and other equipment
after chilling will reduce contamination. should be returned to their proper locations
after cleanup.
Further Processing
Livestock and Poultry Trucks
Chilled carcasses and cuts should not be
exposed to an unchilled environment. The FREQUENCY After each load has been
equipment used in this operation should be hauled.
Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation 315
bottom and side-to-side, with extrane- 2. Cover all electrical connections with
ous matter worked to the floor. This plastic.
prerinse is designed to remove heavy 3. Prerinse all soiled surfaces with 55ºC
soil deposits and to wet the surfaces. water. Start at the bone conveyor top
3. Apply an acid cleaning detergent and work all extraneous matter down
through a slurry or foam gun. Recom- to the floor. Avoid hosing motors, out-
mended spray temperature is 55ºC or lets, and electrical cables.
lower. High-pressure output (for these 4. Following wash-down and subsequent
cleaning operations) is 25 to 70 kg/cm2 heavy soil removal, apply an alkaline
and 7.5 to 12 L/min at the wand. cleaner through a centralized or
4. Within 20 minutes of the cleaning com- portable high-pressure, low-volume sys-
pound application, apply a high-pres- tem, using 50 to 55ºC water. The system
sure rinse with 50 to 55ºC water. should be effectively used to reach all
5. Remove, clean, and replace drain cov- framework, table undersides, and other
ers in the proper position after rinse- difficult-to-reach areas. Allow 5 to 20
down. minutes of soak time prior to rinse-
down. Alternative equipment for clean-
Processed Products, Offal,
ing compound application is a foam
and Storage Cooler
unit. This unit rapidly applies the
FREQUENCY Weekly. Processed meats, cleaner but does not penetrate as well as
offal, and hanging meat should be rotated so does high-pressure, low-volume equip-
that half of a section at a time can be cleaned ment and may be less effective in the
each week. removal of L. monocytogenes.
PROCEDURE 5. Rinse all equipment within 20 minutes
after cleaning compound application.
1. Clean each section, when empty, with a
Using the same pattern as with pre-
reliable floor cleaner. Apply slurry or
rinse and cleaning compound applica-
foam via high pressure.
tion, spray 50 to 55ºC water on one
2. Rinse thoroughly with 55ºC or lower
side of equipment at a time.
temperature water at high pressure
6. Thoroughly inspect all equipment sur-
within 20 minutes of detergent applica-
faces and conduct any necessary
tion. Do not splash water on hanging
touch-up.
meat in the section not being cleaned.
7. Apply an organic sanitizer to all clean
Work all debris to the floor from over-
equipment with a centralized or
head fixtures and walls.
portable sanitizing unit.
3. Squeegee the floor where water has
8. Remove, clean, and replace all drain
accumulated to prevent it from freezing.
covers.
4. Remove, clean, and replace drain covers.
9. Apply white edible oil to surfaces sub-
Fabricating or Further Processing ject to rust or corrosion.
10. Avoid contamination during mainte-
FREQUENCY Daily.
nance, as described previously.
PROCEDURE
1. Pick up all large pieces of lean, fat, If a bone shelter or hopper exists, it
bones, and other extraneous matter, should also be cleaned, as outlined in the
and deposit them in a receptacle. preceding steps. This operation should be
318 PRINCIPLES OF FOOD SANITATION
performed twice a week during winter 9. Remove, clean, and replace drain
months and daily during the summer. covers.
10. Apply white edible oil only to surfaces
Processed Products Area
subject to rust or corrosion.
FREQUENCY Daily. 11. Avoid contamination during mainte-
PROCEDURE nance as described previously.
Fresh Product Processing Areas
1. Dismantle all equipment and place the
parts on a table or rack. Disconnect FREQUENCY Daily.
all stuffing pipes. PROCEDURE
2. Pick up all large pieces of meat and
other extraneous matter and deposit 1. Dismantle all equipment, and place
in a receptacle. the parts on a table or rack. Discon-
3. Cover all electrical connections with nect all stuffing pipes.
plastic. 2. Remove large debris from equipment
4. Prerinse all soiled surfaces with 55ºC and floor and deposit it in a receptacle.
water. Start at the top of all processing 3. Cover mixer and packaging equip-
equipment, and direct all extraneous ment with plastic.
matter down to the floor. Avoid direct 4. Briefly prerinse all soiled surfaces with
hosing of motors, outlets, and electri- 50 to 55ºC water to remove heavy
cal cables. debris and to soak exposed surfaces.
5. Following wash-down and subsequent Guide hoses to force all debris toward
heavy soil removal, apply an alkaline the closest floor drain.
cleaner through a centralized or 5. Apply an alkaline cleaner through
portable high-pressure, low-volume sys- centralized or portable high-pressure,
tem, using 50 to 55ºC water. The system low-volume cleaning equipment,
should effectively reach all framework, using 50 to 55ºC water. Foam, gel, or
tables, other equipment undersides, and slurry may be incorporated to intro-
other difficult-to-reach areas. Soak time duce the cleaning compound. Clean-
prior to rinse-down should be 5 to 20 ing compound application must cover
minutes. Although foam is less effective the entire area equipment, floors,
in penetration, it is a viable cleaning walls, and doors.
medium and is easily applied. 6. Rinse the area and equipment within
6. Rinse all equipment within 20 to 25 20 to 25 minutes after cleaning com-
minutes after cleaning compound pound application.
application. Using the same prerinse 7. Inspect the area and all equipment.
pattern as with the prerinse and deter- Touch up as needed.
gent application, spray 50 to 55ºC 8. Remove, clean, and replace drain covers.
water on one side of each piece of pro- 9. Sanitize all clean equipment with an
cessing equipment at a time. organic sanitizer using a centralized or
7. Thoroughly inspect all equipment portable sanitizing unit.
surfaces and touch up as necessary. 10. Apply white edible oil only to surfaces
8. Apply an organic sanitizer to all clean subject to rust or corrosion.
equipment with a centralized or 11. Avoid contamination during mainte-
portable sanitizing unit. nance as described previously.
Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation 319
5. Sanitize cleaned areas according to 3. Stop the blower and flush again with
manufacturer requirements with a qua- water. Repeat the operation until the
ternary ammonium compound for its equipment is clean.
residual effect.
Housing
6. Spray aging rooms once every 3 months
with a synergized pyrethrin. Follow the 1. Soak the inside of the plenum well, and
directions on the label. Sulfuryl fluoride, wash the blower evolute wall with the
an alternative to methyl bromide that is alkaline cleaning solution.
being phased out, is a non-flammable, 2. Flush the housing with steam, then
odorless, colorless and noncorrosive, that with water. Repeat until the housing is
can leave a residue in the area treated and clean.
the products being stored. 3. Replace drain plugs and access panel.
Smokehouses Smokehouse Steam Coils
FREQUENCY After the end of each FREQUENCY Depends on amount of use.
smoke period. PROCEDURE
PROCEDURE Coils
1. Pick up large debris and place in a 1. Open the coil chamber access door and
receptacle. soak with an alkaline cleaning solution,
2. Apply an alkaline cleaning compound brushing vigorously.
recommended for cleaning smokehouses 2. Flush the coils with steam, then with
through a centralized or portable foam water. Repeat until the metal is shining.
system. Figure 17–4 illustrates a unit
Chamber around Coils
used for cleaning smokehouses.
3. Rinse the area within 20 to 30 minutes 1. Brush the cleaning solution on the
after cleaning compound application. inside of the chamber walls.
Start at the ceiling and walls, and work 2. Use 55ºC water to flush the chamber
all extraneous matter down to the floor wall clean.
drain. 3. Close the coil chamber access door.
4. Inspect all areas, and touch up where
needed. Smokehouse Ducts and Nozzles
5. Apply a quaternary ammonium sani-
FREQUENCY Depends on amount of use.
tizer with a sanitizing unit at the entry
PROCEDURE
area to reduce air contamination.
Outside Ducts
Smokehouse Blower
1. Remove the ductwork at the back of
FREQUENCY After each use cycle. the house and remove carbon deposits.
PROCEDURE Disassembly is not necessary if the
Blades ducts have access panels.
2. Spray the inside surface with an alka-
1. Remove the blower housing access line cleaning solution.
panel and drain plugs; soak with an 3. Flush the outside ducts clean with 90ºC
alkaline solution. water or steam, followed by hot water
2. Start the blower and flush with steam. until the metal is exposed.
Meat and Poultry Plant Sanitation 321
pensive, this system can be effectively 7. Place the clean trolleys in an oil bath
utilized in this cleaning application, while another rack is being cleaned.
due to the potential savings of labor. 8. Place the oiled trolleys over a drip pan
9. Circulate the cleaning solution for at or allow sufficient drip time while sus-
least 30 minutes. pended over the oil tank.
10. Drain the system and flush with 55 to
Offices, Locker Rooms, and Rest Rooms
60ºC water until the effluent is free of
scraps. FREQUENCY Offices, daily; locker rooms
11. Transfer all scraps flushed out of the and rest rooms, at least every other day.
equipment to the inedible department. PROCEDURE
Wire Pallets and Metal Containers 1. Cover electrical connections with plas-
tic sheeting.
FREQUENCY Prior to use.
2. Clean areas with a foam or high-pres-
PROCEDURE
sure unit (or scrub brush and/or mop).
1. Use high-pressure water at 55ºC or 3. Within 20 minutes after cleaning com-
lower as a prerinse. pound application, rinse with 55ºC water.
2. Preferably, apply an alkaline cleaner with 4. If the cleanser and rinse do not clean
a foam unit. If foam is unavailable, use a dirty areas or if drains are not present,
high-pressure, low-volume unit. Never hand scrub with scouring pads.
spray more containers than can be rinsed
Garments
before the cleaning compound dries.
3. Use a high-pressure spray of 55ºC FREQUENCY Daily.
water as a rinse. PROCEDURE
4. Inspect all rinsed containers and re-
1. Place dirty garments into the washer-
clean as needed.
extractor. Do not load the washer
Trolley Wash beyond its rated capacity.
2. Place the programmer dial at the start of
FREQUENCY Depends on the physical
the cycle and push the “On” and “Run”
appearance.
buttons. The drum programmer will
PROCEDURE
automatically select the wash time and
1. Skim off excess waste material form the water temperature. An example would be
cleaning solution. a mixture of 1 kg of a laundry com-
2. Check the cleaning solution strength pound and 0.25 kg of chlorine bleach
with a test kit. If it registers under the should not be used when washing gloves.
recommended strength, add the appro- 3. After the wash-extract cycle, remove the
priate compound and retest. garments and place them in the dryer.
3. Open the main steam valve. Maintain Set aside garments not thoroughly
a solution temperature of 82 to 88ºC. cleaned for re-washing. Do not load the
4. Lower the trolleys into the tank. dryer beyond its rated capacity.
5. After the trolleys have soaked for 25 to 4. Set the temperature at 121ºC for 30
30 minutes, remove them, and rinse minutes. Dry gloves for only 20 minutes.
thoroughly. 5. Place dried garments in a clean wire
6. Inspect the clean trolleys. Place the unsat- crib or equivalent container. They need
isfactory ones on a rack of recleaning. not be folded.
324 PRINCIPLES OF FOOD SANITATION
of sanitizer solution as part of the sanitation areas that are difficult to reach and pene-
final inspection process. trate. However, foam, slurry, and gel clean-
ing have become more prominent because
● Training the sanitors to, inspect their
cleaning is quicker and cleaners are easier to
area as they flood, sanitize will result in
apply using these media. Because of high
a more thorough application of sani-
equipment costs and cleaning limitation,
tizer at a disinfecting rate. Walls, equip-
CIP systems are typically limited primarily
ment, framework, and floors should all
to applications that involve large storage
be flood sanitized.
containers.
Second Step: In meat and poultry plants, acid cleaning
This step should be after pre-op and area compounds are used most frequently to
set-up, but immediately before production remove mineral deposits. Organic soils are
actually starts. Flood all product contact more effectively removed through the use of
surfaces with sanitizer solution at the allow- alkaline cleaning compounds. Chlorine com-
able no-rinse limit. pounds provide the most effective and least
expensive sanitizer for destruction of resid-
● This sanitizing step will remove any soils
ual microorganisms. However, iodine com-
deposited on product contact surfaces
pounds give less corrosion and irritation,
during the set-up phase and bring these
and quaternary ammonium sanitizers have
surfaces into no-rinse compliance to
more of a residual effect. Appropriate clean-
avoid any contamination issues. Leaving
ing procedures depend on the area, equip-
the walls, framework, and floors with
ment, and type of soil.
the higher sanitizer concentrations will
provide additional bacteria control as
the day progresses.
STUDY QUESTIONS
The benefits of two-stage flood sanitiz-
ing become readily apparent as pre-op 1. How do microorganisms affect meat
inspections find less visible soils and bacte- color?
ria growth are reduced throughout produc- 2. What is the function of air curtains?
tion areas. In effect, two-step sanitizing 3. What are limited uses of CIP equip-
adds additional antimicrobial controlling ment in a meat or poultry plant?
rinses without increasing overall sanitation 4. Why is chlorine dioxide an effective
time. sanitizer in meat and poultry plants?
5. Why does the meat and poultry sanitar-
ian need to know something about
SUMMARY HACCP?
6. How can the discoloration of darkened
An efficient cleaning system can reduce concrete floors be removed?
labor costs in meat and poultry plants by up 7. What causes a white film buildup on
to 50%. The optimal cleaning system equipment in a meat and poultry plant?
depends on the type of soil and type of 8. What causes a yellow protein buildup
equipment present. High-pressure, low-vol- on equipment in a meat and poultry
ume cleaning equipment is normally the plant?
most effective for removing heavy organic 9. Where is foam cleaning in a meat or
soil, especially when deposits are located in poultry plant especially beneficial?
326 PRINCIPLES OF FOOD SANITATION
10. How much reduction in labor costs Escherichia coli on commercial broiler carcasses. J. Food
Prot 67:2288.
may be obtained through an efficient Petrak, L. 2003. Ingredients for success. Natl Provisioner 217,
cleaning system for meat and poultry no. 9: 88.
plants? Russell, J. 2003. Swiping pathogens. The Natl Provisioner 217,
no. 4: 63.
11. What is the significance of activated Russell, S.M. 2003. Advances in automated rapid methods for
lactoferrin to the meat processor? enumerating E. coli. Food Saf 9, no. 1: 16.
Sabah, J.R., H. Thippareddi, J.L. Marsden, and D.Y.C. Fung.
12. What are the three alternative levels of
2003. Use of organic acids for the control of Clostridium
listeria control in a meat or poultry perfringens in cooked vacuum-packaged restructured
plant? roast beef during an alternative cooling procedure. J Food
Prot 66: 1408.
Sebranek, J. 2003. Managing listeria. Meat Process 42, no. 5:
66.
REFERENCES Shapton, D.A., and N.F. Shapton, eds. 1991. Buildings. In
Principles and practices for the safe processing of foods, 37.
Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Allen, D. 2004. It's a wash. Meat Market Technol November: Sommers, C., and X. Fan.2003. Gamma irradiation of fine-
62. emulsion sausage containing sodium diacetate. J. Food
Anon. 2004. First processing practices include rinses, brushing. Prot 66: 819.
Watt Poultry USA. 5, no. 8: 28. Sommers, C., X. Fan., A.P. Handle, and K.B. Sokorai. 2003a.
Barboza, Y., D. Martinez, K. Ferrer, and E.M. Salas. 2002. Effect of citric acid on the radiation resistance of Listeria
Combined effects of lactic acid and nisin solution in monocytogenes and frankfurter quality factors. Meat Sci.
reducing levels of microbiological contamination in red 63: 407.
meat carcasses. J Food Prot 65: 1780. Sommers, C., X. Fan, , B.A. Niemira, and K. Sokorai. 2003b.
Bashor, M.P., P.A. Curtis, K.M. Keener, B.W. Sheldon, Radiation (gamma) resistance and post irradiation growth
S. Kathariou, and J.A. Osborne.2004. Effects of carcass of Listeria monocytogenes suspended in beef bologna con-
washers on campylobacter contamination in large broiler taining sodium diacetate and potassium lactate. J. Food
processing plants. Poul Sci 83: 1232. Prot 66: 2051.
Butts, J. 2003. Seek and destroy: Identifying and controlling Lis- Stier, R. 2002. The story of O3. Meat Poultry September: 36.
teria monocytogenes growth niches. Food Saf 9, no. 2: 24. Stahl, N.Z. 2004. 99.99 percent sure. Meat Proc 43, no. 7: 36.
Carling-Kelly, T. 2003. Personal communication. Elmhurst, Stopforth, J.D., J. Samelis, J.N. Sofos, P.A. Kendall, and
IL, Saratoga Specialties. G.C. Smith. 2003. Influence of extended acid stressing in
Castillo, A., K.S. McKenzie, L.M. Lucia, and G.R. Acuff. fresh beef decontamination runoff fluids on sanitizer
2003. Ozone treatment for reduction of Escherichia coli resistance of acid-adapted Escherichia coli O157:H7 in
O157:H7 and salmonella serotype typhimurium on beef biofilms. J. Food Prot 66: 2258.
carcass surfaces. J Food Prot 66: 775. Sunen, E., C. Aristimuno, and B. Fernandes-Galian. 2003.
Clark, J.P. 2004. Ozone-cure for some sanitation problems. Activity of smoke wood condensates against Aeromonas
Food Technol 58, no. 4: 75. hydrophila and Listeria monocytogenes in vacuum-pack-
Doyle, M. P. 1987. Low-temperature bacterial pathogens. Proc aged, cold-smoked rainbow trout stored at 4ºC. Food Res
Meat Ind Res Conf, 51. Washington, DC: American Meat Intl 36, no. 2: 111.
Institute. Velazco, J. 2003. Searching for solutions. Meat Market Technol
Frank, J.F., J. Ehlers, and L. Wicker. 2003. Removal of Liste- September: 121.
ria monocytogenes and poultry soil-containing biofilms Yovich, D.J. 2003. Cargill sharpens its edge on E. coli
using chemical cleaning and sanitizing agents under static O157:H7. Meat Market Technol October: 119.
conditions. Food Prot Trends 23, no. 8: 654. Zhao, T., G. Ezeike, M. Doyle, Y. Hung, and R. Howell. 2003.
Gombas, D.E., Y. Chen, R.S. Clavero, and V.N. Scott. 2003. Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni on poultry by low-
Survey of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods. temperature treatment. J Food Prot 66: 652.
J Food Prot 66: 559.
Lazar, V. 2004. Reaching alternative level one. Meat Proc 43,
no. 7: 28.
McEntire, J.C., T.J. Montville, and M.L. Chikindas. 2003. Syn-
ergy between nisin and select lactates against Listeria mono- SUGGESTED READING
cytogenes is due to metal cations. J Food Prot 66: 1631.
Oyarzabal, O.A., C. Hawk, S.F. Bilgili, C. Warf, and G.K. Marriott, N.G. 1990. Meat sanitation guide II. American Asso-
Kemp. 2004. Effects of postchill application of acidified ciation of Meat Processors and Virginia Polytechnic Insti-
sodium chlorite to control Campyloibacter spp. and tute and State University, Blacksburg.