Business Economics Qasim Masood SAP ID 21362
Business Economics Qasim Masood SAP ID 21362
Business Economics Qasim Masood SAP ID 21362
Qasim Masood
SAP ID 21362
Q1. Explain the Macro and Micro effects of Inflation. Give example in each
case.
3. Rising prices also encourage speculation and hoarding, which detract from
productive activity.
4. Fully anticipated inflation reduces the anxieties and real losses associated
with rising prices. However, few people can foresee actual price patterns or make
all the necessary adjustments in their market activity.
2- Inflation benefits only rich. Evaluate the statement
1. Some people are unaffected by inflation and others are actually helped by it.
For the second group, inflation redistributes real income toward them and away
from others.
2. People who have flexible incomes may escape inflation’s harm or even
benefit from it. Some union workers in the West also get automatic cost-of-living
adjustments (COLAs) in their pay when the CPI rises, although such increases
rarely equal the full percentage rise in inflation. Some flexible-income receivers
and all borrowers are helped by unanticipated inflation. The strong product
demand and labor shortages implied by rapid demand-pull inflation may cause
some nominal incomes to spurt ahead of the price level, thereby enhancing real
incomes. For some, the 3 percent increase in nominal income that occurs when
inflation is 2 percent may become a 7 percent increase when inflation is 5 percent.
As an example, property owners faced with an inflation- induced real estate boom
may be able to boost flexible rents more rapidly than the rate of inflation. Also,
some business owners may benefit from inflation. If product prices rise faster than
resource prices, business revenues will increase more rapidly than costs. In those
cases, the growth rate of profit incomes will outpace the rate of inflation.
3. Unanticipated inflation benefits debtors (borrowers). Thus, inflation
reduces the real burden of the public debt to the Federal government.
4. Anticipated Inflation. The redistribution effects of inflation are less
severe or are eliminated altogether if people anticipate inflation and can adjust
their nominal incomes to reflect the expected price-level rises. The prolonged
inflation that began in the late 1960s prompted many labor unions in the 1970s to
insist on labor contracts with cost-of-living adjustment clauses. Similarly, if
inflation is anticipated, the redistribution of income from lender to borrower may
be altered. Suppose a lender (perhaps a commercial bank or a savings and loan
institution) and a borrower (a household) both agree that 5 percent is a fair rate of
interest on a 1-year loan provided the price level is stable. But assume that inflation
has been occurring and is expected to be 6 percent over the next year. If the bank
lends the household Rs100 at 5 percent interest, the bank will be paid back Rs105
at the end of the year. But if 6 percent inflation does occur during that year, the
purchasing power of the Rs105 will have been reduced to about Rs99. The lender
will, in effect, have paid the borrower Rs1 for the use of the lender’s money for a
year. The lender can avoid this subsidy by charging an inflation premium—that is,
by raising the interest rate by 6 percent, the amount of the anticipated inflation. By
charging 11 percent, the lender will receive back Rs111 at the end of the year.
Adjusted for the 6 percent inflation, that amount will have the purchasing power of
today’s Rs105. The result then will be a mutually agreeable transfer of purchasing
power from borrower to lender of Rs5, or 5 percent, for the use of Rs100 for 1
year.